FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Blocking

Blocking

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *imandHerNotts OP   Couple  over a year ago

North Notts

Is blocking seen as an acceptable method of shortlisting or is it always too harsh and or rude?

Discuss

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yes and Yes

You'll never please everyone, so you might as well please yourselves

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is blocking seen as an acceptable method of shortlisting or is it always too harsh and or rude?

Discuss"

Its your button to use as you like.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If there's a number of profiles that don't tickle your fancy, currently there's no other way to prevent them appearing in the search results.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

Blocking is an accepted fab tradition, where no reasons have to be given. If not compatible, it is ok to block with or without any messages to others you've already had communication with.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ackDMissMorganCouple  over a year ago

Halifax

I think that's what it's there for tbh,save wasting anytime on both sides.

Miss

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ilary and DonaldCouple  over a year ago

chingford

Blocking isn't rude it's a timesaver.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inky-MinxWoman  over a year ago

Grantham

Discuss? Are we taking a test after?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I just like it when reading a profile that is....if you do this or don't do this = BLOCKED lol they must think they are the only ones with a block button

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eviant and BemusedCouple  over a year ago

Burton

We only block for really rude approaches. Fair enough.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I only ever block people who are verbally abusive towards me or who won't take no for an answer.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *igeiaWoman  over a year ago

Bristol

I only tend to block for annoying persistence, abuse or that kind of thing. I don't really block that frequently apart from to counter-block when I spot I have been blocked. Avoids any accidental contact later on if they remove it for some random reason.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I've just been blocked by a guy this evening, because I said there was no interest on my part.

I guess he blocks all who knocks him back.

Good for him, he won't waste his or my time by messaging again in a couple of months.

Don't think it is rude

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Discuss? Are we taking a test after? "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *imandHerNotts OP   Couple  over a year ago

North Notts


"Discuss? Are we taking a test after? "

Only you

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is blocking seen as an acceptable method of shortlisting or is it always too harsh and or rude?

Discuss"

there is nothing to discuss

different people block others for a myriad of reasons ..I don't see it as rude either, its just natural selection for swingers

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's too harsh and rude!!

I don't think anyone picked that answer yet.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0625

0