FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Photo Editing

Photo Editing

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Recently I've been using a few different apps for editing and making my photos more interesting. I did a few Christmassy ones and yesterday created a few that had a graffiti or aged newspaper clipping look to them. I was quite pleased with the results and posted them. They were accepted at first but suddenly today three have been rejected. This went on a number of times with the Christmassy photos too, but after half a day wasted trying to show they were original but edited photos they were accepted. If the criteria applied to these photos were applied across all my photos they should nearly all be rejected because they have been edited, adding frames, filters, vignettes, making them black & white. I find it very hard to understand. One of the few pleasures I get on this site these days is posting photos and it just doesn't seem worth the effort to do something original or a bit different

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I have never had a problem getting my pics accepted, and have used coloured filters on a number of recent pics. However, I don't ever try and mask the fact that its me in the pic as I am guessing a lot of filters do...perhaps that is the problem?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Well if it's any consolation, I like the ones I can see on there now

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I have never had a problem getting my pics accepted, and have used coloured filters on a number of recent pics. However, I don't ever try and mask the fact that its me in the pic as I am guessing a lot of filters do...perhaps that is the problem?"

I don't mask it is me. If they look at other pictures they can see the pictures with less editing that were taken at the same time.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I have never had a problem getting my pics accepted, and have used coloured filters on a number of recent pics. However, I don't ever try and mask the fact that its me in the pic as I am guessing a lot of filters do...perhaps that is the problem?

I don't mask it is me. If they look at other pictures they can see the pictures with less editing that were taken at the same time."

Oh.

Could you edit the other 3 posts too?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Well if it's any consolation, I like the ones I can see on there now "

Thank you. That's really nice to hear. I was just doing something different and a bit surprised that it keeps happening. Someone must be reporting them after they are originally accepted....once they are gabbed enough to ruffle a few feathers maybe?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I have never had a problem getting my pics accepted, and have used coloured filters on a number of recent pics. However, I don't ever try and mask the fact that its me in the pic as I am guessing a lot of filters do...perhaps that is the problem?

I don't mask it is me. If they look at other pictures they can see the pictures with less editing that were taken at the same time.

Oh.

Could you edit the other 3 posts too? "

That'll teach me to make a typo in my OP and delete it. All duplicate threads have been reported

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ce WingerMan  over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ

I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *uzy444Woman  over a year ago

in the suffolk countryside

would it help to have your user name on them?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

I did have my username on those photos

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Ill post my question in this one then as well (since there are three threads running)

Don't the admins normally give a reason when the photos are rejected?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me "

Was I on tv?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *uzy444Woman  over a year ago

in the suffolk countryside


"I did have my username on those photos "
i don't get it then..

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Ill post my question in this one then as well (since there are three threads running)

Don't the admins normally give a reason when the photos are rejected? "

I'll post my answer here too.

Yes but the reason is invalid...or if it is valid then most of my photos should also be rejected using the same criteria

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *b430Man  over a year ago

Tayside

Edited too much to look more like a drawing/ painting rather than a photo of you?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then.."

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ce WingerMan  over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?"

Yes, but only in silhouette form

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then..

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created."

Depends on what criteria they got rejected I guess. What was it 'Too arthouse for this site?'

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form "

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *uzy444Woman  over a year ago

in the suffolk countryside


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then..

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created."

maybe it went off the swoonometer scale and they couldnt allow it as health and saftey risk

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then..

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created.maybe it went off the swoonometer scale and they couldnt allow it as health and saftey risk "

Sarcasm doesn't become you Suzy

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then..

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created.

Depends on what criteria they got rejected I guess. What was it 'Too arthouse for this site?' "

That wasn't the reason but it would have made more sense if it had been the reason

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *uzy444Woman  over a year ago

in the suffolk countryside


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then..

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created.maybe it went off the swoonometer scale and they couldnt allow it as health and saftey risk

Sarcasm doesn't become you Suzy "

thats cos i wasnt being sarcastic..if i was you'd know about it..im not subtle x

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then..

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created.maybe it went off the swoonometer scale and they couldnt allow it as health and saftey risk

Sarcasm doesn't become you Suzy thats cos i wasnt being sarcastic..if i was you'd know about it..im not subtle x"

I know that's why I was laughing

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *iamondjoeMan  over a year ago

Glastonbury

It can be tricky.

Also depends on the photo mod in question and how hard they look at your pix, I suspect.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ce WingerMan  over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes "

I would put a © ® ™ on that avatar if I were you!

P.s. You need a shave

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I did have my username on those photos i don't get it then..

The latest photo was done using the same app just a different effect, but that hasn't been rejected but the other three have. It seems some of the effects are perhaps too clever. Even though it's obvious to me it may not be obvious to others, how the photo was created.maybe it went off the swoonometer scale and they couldnt allow it as health and saftey risk

Sarcasm doesn't become you Suzy thats cos i wasnt being sarcastic..if i was you'd know about it..im not subtle x

I know that's why I was laughing"

You have to remember I score 100% on self-deprecation.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 28/12/16 15:56:44]

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"It can be tricky.

Also depends on the photo mod in question and how hard they look at your pix, I suspect."

Clearly the ones that don't like my pics were asleep when I posted them

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *iamondjoeMan  over a year ago

Glastonbury


"It can be tricky.

Also depends on the photo mod in question and how hard they look at your pix, I suspect.

Clearly the one's that don't like my pics were asleep when I posted them "

Submitting pix in the morning is far more successful than at night, I find. Dunno why.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"It can be tricky.

Also depends on the photo mod in question and how hard they look at your pix, I suspect.

Clearly the one's that don't like my pics were asleep when I posted them

Submitting pix in the morning is far more successful than at night, I find. Dunno why."

I reposted the deleted pic this afternoon and it got rejected as did two more of my photos. Clearly they had a closer look at the other recent photos and decided they were infringing the rules too.

However I think if the photos were not of me I'd have chosen a much better subject to impersonate

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes

I would put a © ® ™ on that avatar if I were you!

P.s. You need a shave "

Which bit?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *iamondjoeMan  over a year ago

Glastonbury


"It can be tricky.

Also depends on the photo mod in question and how hard they look at your pix, I suspect.

Clearly the one's that don't like my pics were asleep when I posted them

Submitting pix in the morning is far more successful than at night, I find. Dunno why.

I reposted the deleted pic this afternoon and it got rejected as did two more of my photos. Clearly they had a closer look at the other recent photos and decided they were infringing the rules too.

However I think if the photos were not of me I'd have chosen a much better subject to impersonate "

That is weird.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ce WingerMan  over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes

I would put a © ® ™ on that avatar if I were you!

P.s. You need a shave

Which bit? "

Well yer bits obviously innit

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

I think I now know the issue. Others have used the same app with the same effect to create pictures and posted them on the web. Seems I'm not original enough

Next time I'll google reverse my photos before posting them it might save any wasted effort

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I had some of my photos rejected because someone had reported them for not being me. The someone, was a man who lives about 300 miles away from me, who had never even messaged me before, let alone chatted to or met !!

I complained to admin who apologised and reinstated my pictures.

The green eyed monster is truly a strange thing.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I had some of my photos rejected because someone had reported them for not being me. The someone, was a man who lives about 300 miles away from me, who had never even messaged me before, let alone chatted to or met !!

I complained to admin who apologised and reinstated my pictures.

The green eyed monster is truly a strange thing."

I did complain and got the standard reply to read the rules. Anyway it looks like I may know why now.

Lesson learned. Don't use fancy effects in apps that others may have used too and posted their efforts on the web already

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes

I would put a © ® ™ on that avatar if I were you!

P.s. You need a shave

Which bit?

Well yer bits obviously innit "

Cheeky fucker - have you been checking my knackers are shaved?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

I've just uploaded one of the ones that got rejected. It has been accepted for now. Let's see what happens.....

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ce WingerMan  over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes

I would put a © ® ™ on that avatar if I were you!

P.s. You need a shave

Which bit?

Well yer bits obviously innit

Cheeky fucker - have you been checking my knackers are shaved? "

Yeah, and I'm sick to the back teeth of picking yer pubes out of the razor if I'm honest!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes

I would put a © ® ™ on that avatar if I were you!

P.s. You need a shave

Which bit?

Well yer bits obviously innit

Cheeky fucker - have you been checking my knackers are shaved?

Yeah, and I'm sick to the back teeth of picking yer pubes out of the razor if I'm honest! "

Just be grateful it's not your teeth

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ce WingerMan  over a year ago

P.O. Box DE1 0NQ


"I can get where you're coming from Doc, my Xmas one (on profile) was ok, but the previous one taken literally a few minutes beforehand was rejected. Maybe the pic mods didn't like who was on the tv screen behind me

Was I on tv?

Yes, but only in silhouette form

I'm going back to my silhouette I might get accused of impersonating or posting a pic of all the other silhouettes

I would put a © ® ™ on that avatar if I were you!

P.s. You need a shave

Which bit?

Well yer bits obviously innit

Cheeky fucker - have you been checking my knackers are shaved?

Yeah, and I'm sick to the back teeth of picking yer pubes out of the razor if I'm honest!

Just be grateful it's not your teeth "

It's okay, I have spare set of dentures

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

[Dentures removed by poster at 28/12/16 16:58:14]

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

  

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

Using APPs to change photos altogether sometimes will be rejected if it is far removed from a photograph.

As always, leave the photo in your gallery and ask Admin to review for you. If you have already done that and got a mail saying check out the pic rules, it means they have looked at it and decided it can't be approved.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

0.0468

0