FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Unisex names
Unisex names
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago
Bristol |
In both my fab and real life the diminutive I go by is a unisex one. In real life I like to see the look of surprise on someone's face when they see me after a work related email, realise their mental image of me was male and adjust accordingly. It amuses me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In both my fab and real life the diminutive I go by is a unisex one. In real life I like to see the look of surprise on someone's face when they see me after a work related email, realise their mental image of me was male and adjust accordingly. It amuses me."
I knew you weren't to be trusted - you have that air about you.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"In both my fab and real life the diminutive I go by is a unisex one. In real life I like to see the look of surprise on someone's face when they see me after a work related email, realise their mental image of me was male and adjust accordingly. It amuses me."
See you turn it for fun. Their fault for the confusion. So are you untrustworthy? ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions. "
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. "
That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago
Bristol |
"In both my fab and real life the diminutive I go by is a unisex one. In real life I like to see the look of surprise on someone's face when they see me after a work related email, realise their mental image of me was male and adjust accordingly. It amuses me. See you turn it for fun. Their fault for the confusion. So are you untrustworthy? ?"
I don't see how becoming a nomenclaturial catalyst for people to do some rapid internalising about gender preconceptions they may not have known they had associated with my work rôle would naturally render me untrustworthy. But you'd have to ask people who know me about that; my own viewpoint on my trustworthiness is far too subjective. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions. "
I remember the post so it cant be that much time  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"In both my fab and real life the diminutive I go by is a unisex one. In real life I like to see the look of surprise on someone's face when they see me after a work related email, realise their mental image of me was male and adjust accordingly. It amuses me. See you turn it for fun. Their fault for the confusion. So are you untrustworthy? ?
I don't see how becoming a nomenclaturial catalyst for people to do some rapid internalising about gender preconceptions they may not have known they had associated with my work rôle would naturally render me untrustworthy. But you'd have to ask people who know me about that; my own viewpoint on my trustworthiness is far too subjective."
By your own admission you revel in duping the duped for gratification I commend you on your honesty regards this. Confusion however still lurks over your own confusion I feel |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???"
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed."
Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say...."
Findings* |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say...."
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you."
Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *evaquitCouple
over a year ago
Catthorpe |
We have friends, Andi who's married to Andrew and Toni who's married to Anthony, both men wear their wives knickers, they seem very trustworthy but we're not sure at all. Care to advise us OP? Grassy ass.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"We have friends, Andi who's married to Andrew and Toni who's married to Anthony, both men wear their wives knickers, they seem very trustworthy but we're not sure at all. Care to advise us OP? Grassy ass. "
I can't speak for your friends. You know them better than I. You seem confused though if having to ask a complete stranger on a swinger site. A hand shake I Fi do can be an indicator. The wet fish handshake is used by many unisexed named people. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent. "
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over."
There's been plenty. Why so aggressive? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive? "
Why so obsessive? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *r TriomanMan
over a year ago
Chippenham Malmesbury area |
"In both my fab and real life the diminutive I go by is a unisex one. In real life I like to see the look of surprise on someone's face when they see me after a work related email, realise their mental image of me was male and adjust accordingly. It amuses me."
So you're Bob!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive?
Why so obsessive?"
Your pursuit of my findings. You say obsessive. It's a debate therfore dynamic. Hence I reply. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive?
Why so obsessive? Your pursuit of my findings. You say obsessive. It's a debate therfore dynamic. Hence I reply. "
Would it help the dynamic debate to suggest that if your name is Bob it really doesn't matter? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive?
Why so obsessive? Your pursuit of my findings. You say obsessive. It's a debate therfore dynamic. Hence I reply.
Would it help the dynamic debate to suggest that if your name is Bob it really doesn't matter?"
 No that would be untrustworthy as it isn't . You are confused |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive?
Why so obsessive? Your pursuit of my findings. You say obsessive. It's a debate therfore dynamic. Hence I reply.
Would it help the dynamic debate to suggest that if your name is Bob it really doesn't matter? No that would be untrustworthy as it isn't . You are confused "
I am absolutely not confused. You seem to have an obsession with this name thing. Does anyone else? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive?
Why so obsessive? Your pursuit of my findings. You say obsessive. It's a debate therfore dynamic. Hence I reply.
Would it help the dynamic debate to suggest that if your name is Bob it really doesn't matter? No that would be untrustworthy as it isn't . You are confused
I am absolutely not confused. You seem to have an obsession with this name thing. Does anyone else?"
Far from it and how can you or I speak for all.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago
Bristol |
Mersey Man is not wholly masculine as a name either though. The Mersey element derives from old Anglo-Saxon and means boundary river, a phrase that combines neutral and feminine words. So your user name in grammatical terms is neuter, feminine and masculine. So since you chose a unisex username for yourself are you untrustworthy OP? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eliWoman
over a year ago
. |
"Mersey Man is not wholly masculine as a name either though. The Mersey element derives from old Anglo-Saxon and means boundary river, a phrase that combines neutral and feminine words. So your user name in grammatical terms is neuter, feminine and masculine. So since you chose a unisex username for yourself are you untrustworthy OP?"
You are entirely wonderful Lig. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive?
Why so obsessive? Your pursuit of my findings. You say obsessive. It's a debate therfore dynamic. Hence I reply.
Would it help the dynamic debate to suggest that if your name is Bob it really doesn't matter? No that would be untrustworthy as it isn't . You are confused
I am absolutely not confused. You seem to have an obsession with this name thing. Does anyone else? Far from it and how can you or I speak for all.... "
Have you ever received any confirmation of your obsession on your threads here? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Mersey Man is not wholly masculine as a name either though. The Mersey element derives from old Anglo-Saxon and means boundary river, a phrase that combines neutral and feminine words. So your user name in grammatical terms is neuter, feminine and masculine. So since you chose a unisex username for yourself are you untrustworthy OP?"
Confusion reigns. Christian names.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Time has elapsed since my last post evoked some strong opinions.
Interested in any feed back. Have you like me find these unfortunate people with unisex names to be confused resulting in being untrustworthy on occasions.
Not that much time, OP.
I see that your obsession continues.
No, unsisex names do not define anyone except you. That's sweeping , surely you can't speak for all???
No, of course I can't speak for all.
From your previous threads, I didn't see anyone agreeing with your premise.
So, while I only speak for myself, I think the majority support my view.
But I know that this will not stop you persisting. You are somewhat obsessed. Your confused, certainly not obsessed I'm interested in Fi dings. A font for knowledge I'd say....
I have no confusion. Names make no difference. And yes, your posts indicate that you believe orherwise. The feedback indicates that noone else does. Keep on posting. You might eventually find someone who agrees with you. Not about agreement it's a debate. Unisex named people fall into confused brackets. And findings find tip scales towards being untrustworthy and I'm finding argumentative tends to be prevalent.
You have had many debates. Noone agrees with you. Debate over.There's been plenty. Why so aggressive?
Why so obsessive? Your pursuit of my findings. You say obsessive. It's a debate therfore dynamic. Hence I reply.
Would it help the dynamic debate to suggest that if your name is Bob it really doesn't matter? No that would be untrustworthy as it isn't . You are confused
I am absolutely not confused. You seem to have an obsession with this name thing. Does anyone else? Far from it and how can you or I speak for all....
Have you ever received any confirmation of your obsession on your threads here?"
Eh?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *evaquitCouple
over a year ago
Catthorpe |
"We have friends, Andi who's married to Andrew and Toni who's married to Anthony, both men wear their wives knickers, they seem very trustworthy but we're not sure at all. Care to advise us OP? Grassy ass. I can't speak for your friends. You know them better than I. You seem confused though if having to ask a complete stranger on a swinger site. A hand shake I Fi do can be an indicator. The wet fish handshake is used by many unisexed named people. "
Now you mention it, the wet fish thingymebob is the absolute giveaway |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago
Bristol |
"Mersey Man is not wholly masculine as a name either though. The Mersey element derives from old Anglo-Saxon and means boundary river, a phrase that combines neutral and feminine words. So your user name in grammatical terms is neuter, feminine and masculine. So since you chose a unisex username for yourself are you untrustworthy OP? Confusion reigns. Christian names. "
Again, I fail to see how a name given to you at birth and/or shortened to a unisex one by other people makes someone more untrustworthy than one who has chosen an ambiguously gendered username, even if it was chosen unwittingly. The former is accidental, the latter is deliberate choice. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Mersey Man is not wholly masculine as a name either though. The Mersey element derives from old Anglo-Saxon and means boundary river, a phrase that combines neutral and feminine words. So your user name in grammatical terms is neuter, feminine and masculine. So since you chose a unisex username for yourself are you untrustworthy OP? Confusion reigns. Christian names.
Again, I fail to see how a name given to you at birth and/or shortened to a unisex one by other people makes someone more untrustworthy than one who has chosen an ambiguously gendered username, even if it was chosen unwittingly. The former is accidental, the latter is deliberate choice."
As the thread says interested in findings. Mine sway to untrustworthy confusion . Regards Masculine n Feminine that's not an issue it's the unisex name the issue. The Mersey being extremely tenious . Go through my profile you'll find plenty of feminine n masculine words that's not the issue. Christian names I repeat.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Who was it (with a unisex name) that hurt you so badly? Its bordering on obsession, or research for an academic institution.
"The proliferation of unisex names and the untrustworthy characters they generate", Man. M, 2016; Fabswings & Tings, London
https://youtu.be/moSFlvxnbgk |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago
Bristol |
"Mersey Man is not wholly masculine as a name either though. The Mersey element derives from old Anglo-Saxon and means boundary river, a phrase that combines neutral and feminine words. So your user name in grammatical terms is neuter, feminine and masculine. So since you chose a unisex username for yourself are you untrustworthy OP? Confusion reigns. Christian names.
Again, I fail to see how a name given to you at birth and/or shortened to a unisex one by other people makes someone more untrustworthy than one who has chosen an ambiguously gendered username, even if it was chosen unwittingly. The former is accidental, the latter is deliberate choice. As the thread says interested in findings. Mine sway to untrustworthy confusion . Regards Masculine n Feminine that's not an issue it's the unisex name the issue. The Mersey being extremely tenious . Go through my profile you'll find plenty of feminine n masculine words that's not the issue. Christian names I repeat...."
My finding on those with unisex Christian names is that they don't differ to other people in the slightest due to their name, either in terms of trustworthiness, limpness of handshake or any of the other negative character traits you seem to want to imbue them with. The ongoing confusion seems to be unique to you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Mersey Man is not wholly masculine as a name either though. The Mersey element derives from old Anglo-Saxon and means boundary river, a phrase that combines neutral and feminine words. So your user name in grammatical terms is neuter, feminine and masculine. So since you chose a unisex username for yourself are you untrustworthy OP? Confusion reigns. Christian names.
Again, I fail to see how a name given to you at birth and/or shortened to a unisex one by other people makes someone more untrustworthy than one who has chosen an ambiguously gendered username, even if it was chosen unwittingly. The former is accidental, the latter is deliberate choice. As the thread says interested in findings. Mine sway to untrustworthy confusion . Regards Masculine n Feminine that's not an issue it's the unisex name the issue. The Mersey being extremely tenious . Go through my profile you'll find plenty of feminine n masculine words that's not the issue. Christian names I repeat....
My finding on those with unisex Christian names is that they don't differ to other people in the slightest due to their name, either in terms of trustworthiness, limpness of handshake or any of the other negative character traits you seem to want to imbue them with. The ongoing confusion seems to be unique to you."
I respect your findings . I urge you not to speak for every one. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Oh OP, you so and so.
I'm hoping there are more feminine names that confuse you. Nowt confusing about a feminine name....  "
Look at Shirley Crabtree, in his prime I would not have wanted to annoy him. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Still no confirmation of the OP's obsession then? Oh, well, I am sure we will get another post next month."
I feel you are not taking this thread seriously.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Still no confirmation of the OP's obsession then? Oh, well, I am sure we will get another post next month. I feel you are not taking this thread seriously. "
Indeed I am not, Sue. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
