 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Could be both of them"
True although the suggested absence of the other half was a clue I ceased upon when formulating my assumption..
What clue did you arrive at during your deductions ....
Sherlock,,,,,  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I would deduce that the female half of a couple would make herself busy and get on with stuff, whilst the male would be the more likely to have his pants round his ankles, masterbating over various internet sites. In conclusion i would say it was the male half. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"was eating lunch and yes iM THE FEMALE"
That suddenly, I guess, makes the proposition for your target market much more enticing. Good luck in the search ..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Could be both of them
True although the suggested absence of the other half was a clue I ceased upon when formulating my assumption..
What clue did you arrive at during your deductions ....
Sherlock,,,,, "
Well its like this....he parades around with womens clothes on ergo he was a she...take a walk on the wild side soxy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Could be both of them
True although the suggested absence of the other half was a clue I ceased upon when formulating my assumption..
What clue did you arrive at during your deductions ....
Sherlock,,,,,
Well its like this....he parades around with womens clothes on ergo he was a she...take a walk on the wild side soxy"
So Watson....you're not saying it was the Butler in the study with a lead pipe..
Interesting,,,,  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Could be both of them
True although the suggested absence of the other half was a clue I ceased upon when formulating my assumption..
What clue did you arrive at during your deductions ....
Sherlock,,,,,
Well its like this....he parades around with womens clothes on ergo he was a she...take a walk on the wild side soxy
So Watson....you're not saying it was the Butler in the study with a lead pipe..
Interesting,,,, "
Ooooh er matron |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
nah its all good guys hardly come on the forums so when someone says something thats banter i may take it as something else not sure if that makes sense but hey ho |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Could be both of them
True although the suggested absence of the other half was a clue I ceased upon when formulating my assumption..
What clue did you arrive at during your deductions ....
Sherlock,,,,,
Well its like this....he parades around with womens clothes on ergo he was a she...take a walk on the wild side soxy
So Watson....you're not saying it was the Butler in the study with a lead pipe..
Interesting,,,,
Ooooh er matron"
Oooo'er Hatty,,,,, seems like today you're gonna be the Matron to my Sir Lancelot Spratt......
now there's a turn around...
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
