FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Can you answer this question?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
"Yes. Vegan women do swallow. It's an involuntary action that is required for both breathing and digestion. You're welcome " | |||
"Yes. Vegan women do swallow. It's an involuntary action that is required for both breathing and digestion. You're welcome " | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"I had no idea vegans don't eat honey. So why are other fruits and veggies free game when some of them are the source of food animals rely on? " I won't be meeting vegans then | |||
| |||
"I had no idea vegans don't eat honey. So why are other fruits and veggies free game when some of them are the source of food animals rely on? I don't think its a hard and fast rule all Vegans stick too..... In the same way allowances are made for the small percentage of ground up animal matter in four/grains/ and pulses ......" flour* | |||
"Remembering that swallowing isn't obligatory - vegan or not - a vegan woman who wanted to do so wouldn't have an issue with it .... yes, it's an animal 'by-product' but the 'owner' of said product is able to voice his consent about her taking it!! Hell, he'd be cheering her on !! Unlike bees, who can't consent to their honey being taken which is why it's a vegan no-no even before you get on to other associated ethical issues Ms G" Ahhhh I understand now thank you for explaining x | |||
"Yes. Vegan women do swallow. It's an involuntary action that is required for both breathing and digestion. You're welcome " | |||
| |||
| |||
"Yes. Vegan women do swallow. It's an involuntary action that is required for both breathing and digestion. You're welcome " New username ... xx | |||
"I had no idea vegans don't eat honey. So why are other fruits and veggies free game when some of them are the source of food animals rely on? " Apparently eating honey is exploiting the poor bees and enslaving them. Take it to the extreme; they should not eat fruit either; since fruit has to be pollinated ( by bees and other insects) so the bees' labour is being exploited. And vegetables might have been fertilized by animal shit; so the animals shit is being exploited. You can take this nonsense as far as you wish.... Perhaps they shouldn't travel on a bus, because the bus driver might be having steak for dinner, so their bus journey, which relies on the driver, is also exploiting animals.... | |||
"I had no idea vegans don't eat honey. So why are other fruits and veggies free game when some of them are the source of food animals rely on? Apparently eating honey is exploiting the poor bees and enslaving them. Take it to the extreme; they should not eat fruit either; since fruit has to be pollinated ( by bees and other insects) so the bees' labour is being exploited. And vegetables might have been fertilized by animal shit; so the animals shit is being exploited. You can take this nonsense as far as you wish.... Perhaps they shouldn't travel on a bus, because the bus driver might be having steak for dinner, so their bus journey, which relies on the driver, is also exploiting animals.... " How about we all get on with our own life choices without rubbishing those that others have made, eh? | |||
"I had no idea vegans don't eat honey. So why are other fruits and veggies free game when some of them are the source of food animals rely on? Apparently eating honey is exploiting the poor bees and enslaving them. Take it to the extreme; they should not eat fruit either; since fruit has to be pollinated ( by bees and other insects) so the bees' labour is being exploited. And vegetables might have been fertilized by animal shit; so the animals shit is being exploited. You can take this nonsense as far as you wish.... Perhaps they shouldn't travel on a bus, because the bus driver might be having steak for dinner, so their bus journey, which relies on the driver, is also exploiting animals.... How about we all get on with our own life choices without rubbishing those that others have made, eh?" Don't get overexcited; its not rubbishing; it's a valid philosophical debate as to how far you take it, and the basic underlying principles. This was the subject of an interesting debate recently, on the " morality of food". The vegan debaters accepted the validity of the argument ; and gave a good account of at what point and why the line is drawn. ( I am talking an academic debate, not a discussion in the pub ) | |||
| |||
| |||
"vegans tend to be against animal violence, animal cruelty, or just don't like the taste of meat. " Not actually; the definition goes beyond cruelty and violence; "Veganism is a way of living which excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom, and includes a reverence for life. It applies to the practice of living on the products of the plant kingdom to the exclusion of flesh, fish, fowl, eggs, honey, animal milk and its derivatives, and encourages the use of alternatives for all commodities derived wholly or in part from animals." This definition itself has flaws; but this is why it is valid to ask how far " derived wholly or in part" goes.... Do cereals grown in a field ploughed by horses count? | |||
"Chatting away at work and the topic of vegans came up. Not your "only vegan for social media" vegans but your pure committed ones. The question that came up and I would like an answer to is:- Do vegan women swallow?" Do vegan men eat pussy ? | |||
| |||
| |||
"Chatting away at work and the topic of vegans came up. Not your "only vegan for social media" vegans but your pure committed ones. The question that came up and I would like an answer to is:- Do vegan women swallow? Do vegan men eat pussy ?" Gwanny..... such obfuscation.... | |||
"I've had the good fortune of travelling to many places around the globe where the local populations diet is limited by what is readily available..... I therefore can't subscribe to moral arguments against humans eating animal derived product. But I respect individual choice where the luxury of choice is an option..,,,, " | |||
"Chatting away at work and the topic of vegans came up. Not your "only vegan for social media" vegans but your pure committed ones. The question that came up and I would like an answer to is:- Do vegan women swallow? Do vegan men eat pussy ?" I should hope not! | |||
"Moving the discussion on....given diet can influence the flavour of a man's cum....what impact does a vegan or vegetarian diet have. And no - I don't want to taste!" Yep! Eat either lots of fruit or lots of sweets. Only time id reguarly considering swallowing...cos as a rule i dont. And i am vegan | |||
"I'm a vegetarian, not a vegan. I don't eat meat, apart from fish meat. Licking ladies, no problem, I'd have a problem if ladies cummed out meat, but I'm yet to 'meat' one. You're a pescatarian not a vegetarian. Regarding health, I'm perfectly healthy. I've been a vegetarian since I was about 16. 13 years." | |||
"I'm a vegetarian, not a vegan. I don't eat meat, apart from fish meat. Licking ladies, no problem, I'd have a problem if ladies cummed out meat, but I'm yet to 'meat' one. Regarding health, I'm perfectly healthy. I've been a vegetarian since I was about 16. 13 years." You're a pescatarian Miss T x | |||
"I'm a vegetarian, not a vegan. I don't eat meat, apart from fish meat. " So you aren't a vegetarian ..... | |||
"vegans tend to be against animal violence, animal cruelty, or just don't like the taste of meat. Not actually; the definition goes beyond cruelty and violence; "Veganism is a way of living which excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom, and includes a reverence for life. It applies to the practice of living on the products of the plant kingdom to the exclusion of flesh, fish, fowl, eggs, honey, animal milk and its derivatives, and encourages the use of alternatives for all commodities derived wholly or in part from animals." This definition itself has flaws; but this is why it is valid to ask how far " derived wholly or in part" goes.... Do cereals grown in a field ploughed by horses count? " Do vegans apply these principals to other human beings? Because i have met some less than nice vegans. | |||
"vegans tend to be against animal violence, animal cruelty, or just don't like the taste of meat. Not actually; the definition goes beyond cruelty and violence; "Veganism is a way of living which excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom, and includes a reverence for life. It applies to the practice of living on the products of the plant kingdom to the exclusion of flesh, fish, fowl, eggs, honey, animal milk and its derivatives, and encourages the use of alternatives for all commodities derived wholly or in part from animals." This definition itself has flaws; but this is why it is valid to ask how far " derived wholly or in part" goes.... Do cereals grown in a field ploughed by horses count? " probably not. working animals does not always mean cruelty, and in the western world we use more efficient machinery anyway (hence why everything in the US is full of corn starch). and that's the thing though, they aren't supporting the eating of meat or using animals to produce food via their breeding process, only the meat eaters are doing that. | |||
"vegans tend to be against animal violence, animal cruelty, or just don't like the taste of meat. Not actually; the definition goes beyond cruelty and violence; "Veganism is a way of living which excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom, and includes a reverence for life. It applies to the practice of living on the products of the plant kingdom to the exclusion of flesh, fish, fowl, eggs, honey, animal milk and its derivatives, and encourages the use of alternatives for all commodities derived wholly or in part from animals." This definition itself has flaws; but this is why it is valid to ask how far " derived wholly or in part" goes.... Do cereals grown in a field ploughed by horses count? probably not. working animals does not always mean cruelty, and in the western world we use more efficient machinery anyway (hence why everything in the US is full of corn starch). and that's the thing though, they aren't supporting the eating of meat or using animals to produce food via their breeding process, only the meat eaters are doing that." But it's not actually about eating meat; It is about a way of life that " excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom". Which is why vegans don't eat honey. And which is why use of an animal as a farm source of power, ( ploughing), in theory comes under that remit. Or any use of an animal, however many times removed from the actual food, makes that food unusable . That is why when vegans claim to be the " purists" they cannot be; because there is no way to make the separation . | |||
| |||
"vegans tend to be against animal violence, animal cruelty, or just don't like the taste of meat. Not actually; the definition goes beyond cruelty and violence; "Veganism is a way of living which excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom, and includes a reverence for life. It applies to the practice of living on the products of the plant kingdom to the exclusion of flesh, fish, fowl, eggs, honey, animal milk and its derivatives, and encourages the use of alternatives for all commodities derived wholly or in part from animals." This definition itself has flaws; but this is why it is valid to ask how far " derived wholly or in part" goes.... Do cereals grown in a field ploughed by horses count? probably not. working animals does not always mean cruelty, and in the western world we use more efficient machinery anyway (hence why everything in the US is full of corn starch). and that's the thing though, they aren't supporting the eating of meat or using animals to produce food via their breeding process, only the meat eaters are doing that. But it's not actually about eating meat; It is about a way of life that " excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom". Which is why vegans don't eat honey. And which is why use of an animal as a farm source of power, ( ploughing), in theory comes under that remit. Or any use of an animal, however many times removed from the actual food, makes that food unusable . That is why when vegans claim to be the " purists" they cannot be; because there is no way to make the separation . " you can be as ethical as possible though, and that's the goal. i've not looked into it but there will be cereals that guarantee no animal suffered to make that cereal. not sure how they collect poop but they don't force ti out the cows bum that i know of, it's just a by product of keeping cows. i'm a meat eater myself, but i don't like most meats texture so don't really eat it that much. i could probably easily go vegetarian but i have meat in my house for my kids and sometimes nibble some if it's convenient, but i can see why it's not right to really eat animals, or drink milk, or use most of the animal products available to me. even the rspca would like farms to be closed down altogether, but while there is a demand for that service they just make sure farms are run as ethically as possible instead. and that's how it will be for al people making conscious decisions to live a more harmless life, they know what's realistic and try to change what they can't deal with. | |||
"vegans tend to be against animal violence, animal cruelty, or just don't like the taste of meat. Not actually; the definition goes beyond cruelty and violence; "Veganism is a way of living which excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom, and includes a reverence for life. It applies to the practice of living on the products of the plant kingdom to the exclusion of flesh, fish, fowl, eggs, honey, animal milk and its derivatives, and encourages the use of alternatives for all commodities derived wholly or in part from animals." This definition itself has flaws; but this is why it is valid to ask how far " derived wholly or in part" goes.... Do cereals grown in a field ploughed by horses count? probably not. working animals does not always mean cruelty, and in the western world we use more efficient machinery anyway (hence why everything in the US is full of corn starch). and that's the thing though, they aren't supporting the eating of meat or using animals to produce food via their breeding process, only the meat eaters are doing that. But it's not actually about eating meat; It is about a way of life that " excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom". Which is why vegans don't eat honey. And which is why use of an animal as a farm source of power, ( ploughing), in theory comes under that remit. Or any use of an animal, however many times removed from the actual food, makes that food unusable . That is why when vegans claim to be the " purists" they cannot be; because there is no way to make the separation . you can be as ethical as possible though, and that's the goal. i've not looked into it but there will be cereals that guarantee no animal suffered to make that cereal. not sure how they collect poop but they don't force ti out the cows bum that i know of, it's just a by product of keeping cows. i'm a meat eater myself, but i don't like most meats texture so don't really eat it that much. i could probably easily go vegetarian but i have meat in my house for my kids and sometimes nibble some if it's convenient, but i can see why it's not right to really eat animals, or drink milk, or use most of the animal products available to me. even the rspca would like farms to be closed down altogether, but while there is a demand for that service they just make sure farms are run as ethically as possible instead. and that's how it will be for al people making conscious decisions to live a more harmless life, they know what's realistic and try to change what they can't deal with." Why is it "not right to eat animals?" can you explain exactly why? And since when has RSPCA asked for farms to be closed down altogether? Could you show me the link to the RSPCA policy on this? ( I know there was a move by certain activist groups to take over the RSPCA, but that was defended against, I believe.) | |||
"vegans tend to be against animal violence, animal cruelty, or just don't like the taste of meat. Not actually; the definition goes beyond cruelty and violence; "Veganism is a way of living which excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom, and includes a reverence for life. It applies to the practice of living on the products of the plant kingdom to the exclusion of flesh, fish, fowl, eggs, honey, animal milk and its derivatives, and encourages the use of alternatives for all commodities derived wholly or in part from animals." This definition itself has flaws; but this is why it is valid to ask how far " derived wholly or in part" goes.... Do cereals grown in a field ploughed by horses count? probably not. working animals does not always mean cruelty, and in the western world we use more efficient machinery anyway (hence why everything in the US is full of corn starch). and that's the thing though, they aren't supporting the eating of meat or using animals to produce food via their breeding process, only the meat eaters are doing that. But it's not actually about eating meat; It is about a way of life that " excludes all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, the animal kingdom". Which is why vegans don't eat honey. And which is why use of an animal as a farm source of power, ( ploughing), in theory comes under that remit. Or any use of an animal, however many times removed from the actual food, makes that food unusable . That is why when vegans claim to be the " purists" they cannot be; because there is no way to make the separation . you can be as ethical as possible though, and that's the goal. i've not looked into it but there will be cereals that guarantee no animal suffered to make that cereal. not sure how they collect poop but they don't force ti out the cows bum that i know of, it's just a by product of keeping cows. i'm a meat eater myself, but i don't like most meats texture so don't really eat it that much. i could probably easily go vegetarian but i have meat in my house for my kids and sometimes nibble some if it's convenient, but i can see why it's not right to really eat animals, or drink milk, or use most of the animal products available to me. even the rspca would like farms to be closed down altogether, but while there is a demand for that service they just make sure farms are run as ethically as possible instead. and that's how it will be for al people making conscious decisions to live a more harmless life, they know what's realistic and try to change what they can't deal with. Why is it "not right to eat animals?" can you explain exactly why? And since when has RSPCA asked for farms to be closed down altogether? Could you show me the link to the RSPCA policy on this? ( I know there was a move by certain activist groups to take over the RSPCA, but that was defended against, I believe.)" luckily they said it in a youtube video so i can post the link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYX0Aa21sLI animals are sentient beings, i personally don't think it's right to eat them, just like i don't actually eat humans. most people if they wouldn't eat people then they probably wouldn't eat animals either, if they hadn't been brought up to eat them. i'm struggling with not eating meat and giving up dairy but i feel that i should do that and am still trying to convince myself. | |||
| |||
| |||
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMwqlpHPBqs thought it was one of these two videos, not sure he says it, and i suppose it could have been a representatives own opinion as well." Yes; so a video about improving conditions in chicken farms; and the progress made, translates into your mind into " RSPCA policy is to close down all farms?" Wonder where you made that link. Strange how people read what's not there, into a perfectly clear and informative video. Perhaps you were confused by a separate campaign which was to shut down the rogue dog breeders (" puppy farms").( quite rightly) There is no agenda in the RSPCA TO " stop farming"...... | |||
"I shouldn't have left this going for so long (actually forgot all about it to be fair). So to clarify what I was asking: do vegans swallow cum? I didn't mean for it to get out of hand, it was just a general question " I think it evolved into an interesting thread...... Healthy thought exchange is a good thing Nothing wrong with challenging the rationality of our own thinking against the views and opinions of those who see things from a differing perspective... Good thread | |||
"I shouldn't have left this going for so long (actually forgot all about it to be fair). So to clarify what I was asking: do vegans swallow cum? I didn't mean for it to get out of hand, it was just a general question I think it evolved into an interesting thread...... Healthy thought exchange is a good thing Nothing wrong with challenging the rationality of our own thinking against the views and opinions of those who see things from a differing perspective... Good thread " Good threads have a life of their own . | |||
"I shouldn't have left this going for so long (actually forgot all about it to be fair). So to clarify what I was asking: do vegans swallow cum? I didn't mean for it to get out of hand, it was just a general question I think it evolved into an interesting thread...... Healthy thought exchange is a good thing Nothing wrong with challenging the rationality of our own thinking against the views and opinions of those who see things from a differing perspective... Good thread Good threads have a life of their own ." I agree ...... I prefer thread where people make the effort to contribute their own views and opinions rather than cut and paste plagiarised reference material or post links to articles written by others ... But apart from that, as long as Godwins Law keeps it's nose out , I like to see enthusiastic debate.... | |||
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMwqlpHPBqs thought it was one of these two videos, not sure he says it, and i suppose it could have been a representatives own opinion as well. Yes; so a video about improving conditions in chicken farms; and the progress made, translates into your mind into " RSPCA policy is to close down all farms?" Wonder where you made that link. Strange how people read what's not there, into a perfectly clear and informative video. Perhaps you were confused by a separate campaign which was to shut down the rogue dog breeders (" puppy farms").( quite rightly) There is no agenda in the RSPCA TO " stop farming"......" i actually thought the vet in those videos had said it, but even if he had it could've been his personal opinion, don't think he even said it in that video either. that video is years old, just that was the only upload i found of it on youtube, so i was remembering something from years ago. and the topic didn't get out of hand OP, people are arguing in a civil way. | |||
"I shouldn't have left this going for so long (actually forgot all about it to be fair). So to clarify what I was asking: do vegans swallow cum? I didn't mean for it to get out of hand, it was just a general question I think it evolved into an interesting thread...... Healthy thought exchange is a good thing Nothing wrong with challenging the rationality of our own thinking against the views and opinions of those who see things from a differing perspective... Good thread Good threads have a life of their own . I agree ...... I prefer thread where people make the effort to contribute their own views and opinions rather than cut and paste plagiarised reference material or post links to articles written by others ... But apart from that, as long as Godwins Law keeps it's nose out , I like to see enthusiastic debate.... " Alright Goebbels, no need for this kind of propaganda | |||
"I shouldn't have left this going for so long (actually forgot all about it to be fair). So to clarify what I was asking: do vegans swallow cum? I didn't mean for it to get out of hand, it was just a general question I think it evolved into an interesting thread...... Healthy thought exchange is a good thing Nothing wrong with challenging the rationality of our own thinking against the views and opinions of those who see things from a differing perspective... Good thread Good threads have a life of their own . I agree ...... I prefer thread where people make the effort to contribute their own views and opinions rather than cut and paste plagiarised reference material or post links to articles written by others ... But apart from that, as long as Godwins Law keeps it's nose out , I like to see enthusiastic debate.... Alright Goebbels, no need for this kind of propaganda " | |||
"Yes. Vegan women do swallow. It's an involuntary action that is required for both breathing and digestion. You're welcome " lol boom boom | |||
"Yes. Vegan women do swallow. It's an involuntary action that is required for both breathing and digestion. You're welcome " Totally stealing the joke in your status | |||
"yes they can swallow...cum is a natural product " So a vegan wouldn't consider the 40,000,000 to 1.2 billion sperm in the average ejaculate "alive" then?. | |||
"Chatting away at work and the topic of vegans came up. Not your "only vegan for social media" vegans but your pure committed ones. The question that came up and I would like an answer to is:- Do vegan women swallow?" not if it's cheesy | |||
"Yes. Vegan women do swallow. It's an involuntary action that is required for both breathing and digestion. You're welcome " | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||