FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Privacy and Trust
Privacy and Trust
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *idzguy OP Man
over a year ago
coventry |
Just seen a member who is a policeman has been named and shamed in the national and local press for being a member on here. Does anyone care? What I do find sad is that another member has clearly outed him for being on here as a Copper and having private pics of him in uniform. It's terrible that another member has potentially ruined his career. And members sometimes get arsey when we don't send private pics but this just magnifies why........I think the trust of this side is going downhill and whoever outed the member in question should be ashamed. It's his sex life and shouldn't be a story in the Sun |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" What I do find sad is that another member has clearly outed him for being on here as a Copper and having private pics of him in uniform. It's terrible that another member has potentially ruined his career. "
What makes you think this was a clear case of sour grapes?..
Everyone and anyone can join this site.
What?...you don't think journo's are on here?...
God knows this site has been in the press enough.
Bottom line is, don't have anything on this site you're unhappy with.
The bloke ruined his own career, he chose to join the site, if he's put identifiable pictures of himself here either public or private in the job that he has, well then he's a fucking moron and now he's lost his job.
I'm pretty private and choosy about who I interact with. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
i don't understand how, in this day and age, being on a swingers site would give anyone cause for concern. he should be able to have private pics of himself.
i do think this officer was doing sexual stuff while he was supposed to be working and that was the bad move? he only has himself to blame for that.
it wasn't very professional of him to sexualise his uniform either. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" What I do find sad is that another member has clearly outed him for being on here as a Copper and having private pics of him in uniform. It's terrible that another member has potentially ruined his career.
What makes you think this was a clear case of sour grapes?..
Everyone and anyone can join this site.
What?...you don't think journo's are on here?...
God knows this site has been in the press enough.
Bottom line is, don't have anything on this site you're unhappy with.
The bloke ruined his own career, he chose to join the site, if he's put identifiable pictures of himself here either public or private in the job that he has, well then he's a fucking moron and now he's lost his job.
I'm pretty private and choosy about who I interact with."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I've got a mixed opinion on this one. I mean there are other online sites which people clearly list themselves as being in the teaching profession which I find more offensive than a policeman on fab. I don't know the ins and outs of this guy's story but he is entitled to a private life. I suppose the point I am making is other sites insist on a profile pic etc so your face is openly out there yet this site doesn't so you can have more privacy if wanted |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just don't think a career choice should define what you are allowed to do sexually oh well "
I agree, no matter what you do for a living you're entitled to the privacy of a sex life. I think there been two recent cases which are very similar; one copper was using fab whilst on duty and even ignored police calls to engage in private acts, which is blatantly taking the piss. And another copper who was just a bit daft in uploading a pic of himself in uniform, which isn't exactly the end of the world but I can see why the force would want to take action against him to be honest as it does affect the reputation of the whole force / profession.
It's really sad though that journalists are using the site looking for juicy and sordid stories |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Why did the guy feel the need to use his uniform as part of his attraction? He would have had training and signed documents about 'not being the service into disrepute' so obviously either didn't understand or didn't care. Even so, it's a a tough outcome on him and his family. No winners from this one  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The bloke ruined his own career, he chose to join the site, if he's put identifiable pictures of himself here either public or private in the job that he has, well then he's a fucking moron and now he's lost his job."
What the man does in his private life is his business. But he chose to bring his work into it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Just don't think a career choice should define what you are allowed to do sexually oh well "
He was a silly arse. There was no need at all for him to pose in his uniform.
He obviously thought that would garner him more attention - and it did.
He deserved to be sacked for his stupidity as opposed to anything else. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It was only in the news last week about those men who were sent to prison years ago for being gay now having a pardon for their 'crimes'. I can see any difference here with a police officer been on a site like this. It's NOT illegal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *idzguy OP Man
over a year ago
coventry |
Well from looking at previous posts on this forum it's maybe a lesson to us all to be more careful? Or fab get a more detailed vetting process if journalists are looking for dirt. Maybe make it compulsory that a face pic is sent to admin as u do to get photos verified. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well from looking at previous posts on this forum it's maybe a lesson to us all to be more careful? Or fab get a more detailed vetting process if journalists are looking for dirt. Maybe make it compulsory that a face pic is sent to admin as u do to get photos verified. "
Can you tell someone is a journalist from their face pic  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I get a feeling that a lot on this site like to think they're broadminded but in reality, they want having nsa sex to be seen as being dirty and sordid to make themselves feel like they're living some sort of wild life.
It's quite sad really.
If all the guy did was have sex, then what's the big deal.
I'm pretty sure loads of police officers put their uniforms on and use their handcuffs when fucking their wives and girlfriends. What's the harm? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I get a feeling that a lot on this site like to think they're broadminded but in reality, they want having nsa sex to be seen as being dirty and sordid to make themselves feel like they're living some sort of wild life.
It's quite sad really.
If all the guy did was have sex, then what's the big deal.
I'm pretty sure loads of police officers put their uniforms on and use their handcuffs when fucking their wives and girlfriends. What's the harm?"
i had someone turn up to mine in their uniform, it was pretty hot. plus gave the neighbours something to talk about.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
There's another thread about this somewhere.
I feel for him that's he's lost his job but he shouldn't have been so blatant on his profile and his chats with people about being a policeman.
As someone said trust no one.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" What I do find sad is that another member has clearly outed him for being on here as a Copper and having private pics of him in uniform. It's terrible that another member has potentially ruined his career.
What makes you think this was a clear case of sour grapes?..
Everyone and anyone can join this site.
What?...you don't think journo's are on here?...
God knows this site has been in the press enough.
Bottom line is, don't have anything on this site you're unhappy with.
The bloke ruined his own career, he chose to join the site, if he's put identifiable pictures of himself here either public or private in the job that he has, well then he's a fucking moron and now he's lost his job.
I'm pretty private and choosy about who I interact with."
No, he didn't ruin his own career. Some other cunt did that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
i have had more than 1 policeman who has called while on duty for a 'little chat'.But as soon as they were called they left immediately. 1 always worn his uniform for six even when he was off duty, I thought it was hot |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I've got a mixed opinion on this one. I mean there are other online sites which people clearly list themselves as being in the teaching profession which I find more offensive than a policeman on fab. I don't know the ins and outs of this guy's story but he is entitled to a private life. I suppose the point I am making is other sites insist on a profile pic etc so your face is openly out there yet this site doesn't so you can have more privacy if wanted "
What's offensive about being a teacher who is also a swinger ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
When I worked in the jobcentre which is the Department for Work and Pensions we were told and warned and had refresher statements to sign every year about the electronic media policy. We wasn't allowed to say anything on Facebook or twitter or any social media whilst making ourselves known where we work, like I couldn't say something like I hate immigrants whilst having my place of work listed as DWP. Anything that brings your profession into disrepute was a stackable offence. I expect if I posed for pictures wearing the jobcentre plus lanyard and those pictures were on a sex site, I'd be sacked, think it would be the same for any job. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Obviously it is not illegal to be on here if you are a policeman . But to pose in your uniform with your number showing isn't appropriate. Policemen in uniform can't buy alcohol. Or pose on swinger's sites in their uniform. Likewise a teacher can be on here but they shouldn't pose in front of their school with its name visible. Swing but keep your work life separate
Sally |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Thanks for this thread!
I never read the papers - especially the Scum!
Feel for the poor fella, career ruined for what??
But Its made me put pics private
Cheers dude |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *illnatMan
over a year ago
wherever i need to be |
That's why I refuse to mention my job. They have the same social media and online policies. They would class me being on here as bringing them into disrepute and instant dismissal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've got a mixed opinion on this one. I mean there are other online sites which people clearly list themselves as being in the teaching profession which I find more offensive than a policeman on fab. I don't know the ins and outs of this guy's story but he is entitled to a private life. I suppose the point I am making is other sites insist on a profile pic etc so your face is openly out there yet this site doesn't so you can have more privacy if wanted
What's offensive about being a teacher who is also a swinger ?"
That's not the issue. It's about bringing ones organisation into disrepute as per the contract. There is nothing offensive about a teacher swinging - I know there are some on here - but they don't pose naked in their classroom, do they? Same as the policeman ought not to have posed in his uniform. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *idzguy OP Man
over a year ago
coventry |
Yes I know company's adopt same social media policy I.e bringing company into disrepute can be sackable but it's just s but slack that someone who's a member highlighted it or a journalist looking for a story just sad that all members don't adopt discretion. I mean I see people I know on here although they don't know that and id never tell them it's about respecting people and bring discrete. Oh well |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm not aware of the case. Whereas I believe that ones private sex life and any involvement with social media is of no business to ones employers, I also feel he was unprofessional to post uniform pictures on social media especially a sex site (if this is indeed correct). I too am in a profession that requires me to where a uniform, and we're not even allowed to post pictures of ourselves in uniform on a Facebook. And even with Facebook I would be very careful with what I say about work. So Fab would be out of the question. If work is kept separate from sex, then if found out I feel one can legitimately say 'my private life in none of your business'. But it's difficult to say that if a uniform picture is posted.
Mrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ooking for bbwsCouple
over a year ago
secret garden chilling, always something to do in the garden |
"Just seen a member who is a policeman has been named and shamed in the national and local press for being a member on here. Does anyone care? What I do find sad is that another member has clearly outed him for being on here as a Copper and having private pics of him in uniform. It's terrible that another member has potentially ruined his career. And members sometimes get arsey when we don't send private pics but this just magnifies why........I think the trust of this side is going downhill and whoever outed the member in question should be ashamed. It's his sex life and shouldn't be a story in the Sun "
when ever I get contacted by a policeman, they either chicken out after 2nd message, or disappear! I don't no y but I won't meet policemen, as I'm really not sure it's wise to, I probably av but rather they did not say there job untill we if ever meet!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Too many Chinese whispers.
He didn't have any pics in uniform or mention of his job on his profile.
The misconduct while on duty is a different case.
Police in uniform is a fairly common fantasy....I have seen requests for real policemen on my local updates recently.
It's very likely he answered such a request and was no doubt asked for proof....that would be kinda normal.
It obviously wasn't the wisest choice to send such a pic even in private but the betrayal of trust in outing him to a filthy rag whether by a journo or a disgruntled fabber is truly shocking.
For those who discretion is really important it beds some serious questions.
Face pics before a meet? Details of sexual preferences even after a meet? After all who do we verify people are what they say they are or that we won't let slip details of our lives that make us vulnerable to such attacks?
For some just writing this off as his stupidity doesn't even begin to answer important questions.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I've got a mixed opinion on this one. I mean there are other online sites which people clearly list themselves as being in the teaching profession which I find more offensive than a policeman on fab. I don't know the ins and outs of this guy's story but he is entitled to a private life. I suppose the point I am making is other sites insist on a profile pic etc so your face is openly out there yet this site doesn't so you can have more privacy if wanted
What's offensive about being a teacher who is also a swinger ?
That's not the issue. It's about bringing ones organisation into disrepute as per the contract. There is nothing offensive about a teacher swinging - I know there are some on here - but they don't pose naked in their classroom, do they? Same as the policeman ought not to have posed in his uniform. "
I agree with that but the person posted that they found it offensive hence my question. Aslong as they dont swing at work or have pics there then i dont see whats offensive about a teacher being a swinger. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm not aware of the case. Whereas I believe that ones private sex life and any involvement with social media is of no business to ones employers, I also feel he was unprofessional to post uniform pictures on social media especially a sex site (if this is indeed correct). I too am in a profession that requires me to where a uniform, and we're not even allowed to post pictures of ourselves in uniform on a Facebook. And even with Facebook I would be very careful with what I say about work. So Fab would be out of the question. If work is kept separate from sex, then if found out I feel one can legitimately say 'my private life in none of your business'. But it's difficult to say that if a uniform picture is posted.
Mrs"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"When I worked in the jobcentre which is the Department for Work and Pensions we were told and warned and had refresher statements to sign every year about the electronic media policy. We wasn't allowed to say anything on Facebook or twitter or any social media whilst making ourselves known where we work, like I couldn't say something like I hate immigrants whilst having my place of work listed as DWP. Anything that brings your profession into disrepute was a stackable offence. I expect if I posed for pictures wearing the jobcentre plus lanyard and those pictures were on a sex site, I'd be sacked, think it would be the same for any job. "
I work for a trade union in employment law. I sigh every day as members come to us facing dismissal for things they've written on social media.
We have to draw their attention to internal policies they sign of on annually, notices about computer usage policy they agree to every time they log in.
Some jobs you can't even tell anyone you're applying and they state not to mention it on social media.
People are very naive if they assume anything they do outside of work is their business. If that were the case we wouldn't need vetting agencies.
For some jobs/professions bringing your employer into disrepute is a sackable offense. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"That's why I refuse to mention my job. They have the same social media and online policies. They would class me being on here as bringing them into disrepute and instant dismissal. "
You know that and sign off on it, yet some are in denial about this. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When I worked in the jobcentre which is the Department for Work and Pensions we were told and warned and had refresher statements to sign every year about the electronic media policy. We wasn't allowed to say anything on Facebook or twitter or any social media whilst making ourselves known where we work, like I couldn't say something like I hate immigrants whilst having my place of work listed as DWP. Anything that brings your profession into disrepute was a stackable offence. I expect if I posed for pictures wearing the jobcentre plus lanyard and those pictures were on a sex site, I'd be sacked, think it would be the same for any job.
I work for a trade union in employment law. I sigh every day as members come to us facing dismissal for things they've written on social media.
We have to draw their attention to internal policies they sign of on annually, notices about computer usage policy they agree to every time they log in.
Some jobs you can't even tell anyone you're applying and they state not to mention it on social media.
People are very naive if they assume anything they do outside of work is their business. If that were the case we wouldn't need vetting agencies.
For some jobs/professions bringing your employer into disrepute is a sackable offense."
How does having sex bring anyone into disrepute? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When I worked in the jobcentre which is the Department for Work and Pensions we were told and warned and had refresher statements to sign every year about the electronic media policy. We wasn't allowed to say anything on Facebook or twitter or any social media whilst making ourselves known where we work, like I couldn't say something like I hate immigrants whilst having my place of work listed as DWP. Anything that brings your profession into disrepute was a stackable offence. I expect if I posed for pictures wearing the jobcentre plus lanyard and those pictures were on a sex site, I'd be sacked, think it would be the same for any job.
I work for a trade union in employment law. I sigh every day as members come to us facing dismissal for things they've written on social media.
We have to draw their attention to internal policies they sign of on annually, notices about computer usage policy they agree to every time they log in.
Some jobs you can't even tell anyone you're applying and they state not to mention it on social media.
People are very naive if they assume anything they do outside of work is their business. If that were the case we wouldn't need vetting agencies.
For some jobs/professions bringing your employer into disrepute is a sackable offense.
How does having sex bring anyone into disrepute?"
I suppose it's how it's portrayed and obviously blatantly advertising where you work etc. In the job that I do I am accountable to a higher governing body and have to maintain a professional image at all times!! Although I don't think that some of my pictures portray a professional image.
Mrs SnT |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've got a mixed opinion on this one. I mean there are other online sites which people clearly list themselves as being in the teaching profession which I find more offensive than a policeman on fab. I don't know the ins and outs of this guy's story but he is entitled to a private life. I suppose the point I am making is other sites insist on a profile pic etc so your face is openly out there yet this site doesn't so you can have more privacy if wanted
What's offensive about being a teacher who is also a swinger ?
That's not the issue. It's about bringing ones organisation into disrepute as per the contract. There is nothing offensive about a teacher swinging - I know there are some on here - but they don't pose naked in their classroom, do they? Same as the policeman ought not to have posed in his uniform.
I agree with that but the person posted that they found it offensive hence my question. Aslong as they dont swing at work or have pics there then i dont see whats offensive about a teacher being a swinger."
Thats not what I said at all. I wasn't talking about swinging. I was talking about teachers on other sites and compulsory photos. The reason being is so easy for teens in school to access those sites. I was making a point about privacy not who can swing and who can't. The reason I mentioned teachers was the sheer amount I have seen on said site |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When I worked in the jobcentre which is the Department for Work and Pensions we were told and warned and had refresher statements to sign every year about the electronic media policy. We wasn't allowed to say anything on Facebook or twitter or any social media whilst making ourselves known where we work, like I couldn't say something like I hate immigrants whilst having my place of work listed as DWP. Anything that brings your profession into disrepute was a stackable offence. I expect if I posed for pictures wearing the jobcentre plus lanyard and those pictures were on a sex site, I'd be sacked, think it would be the same for any job.
I work for a trade union in employment law. I sigh every day as members come to us facing dismissal for things they've written on social media.
We have to draw their attention to internal policies they sign of on annually, notices about computer usage policy they agree to every time they log in.
Some jobs you can't even tell anyone you're applying and they state not to mention it on social media.
People are very naive if they assume anything they do outside of work is their business. If that were the case we wouldn't need vetting agencies.
For some jobs/professions bringing your employer into disrepute is a sackable offense.
How does having sex bring anyone into disrepute?"
It's being publicly outed on a sex site which is the problem, can make the job untenable.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The police have a new code of ethics in place, are constantly reminded not to post anything on facebook relating to work, have been told to remove any reference from policing on LinkedIn after the heightened security risk and particularly post Lee Rugby, Nick Gragam, Chief Constable for Avon and Somerset got Hauled up for sex hassurement, there cases of professional misconduct of police misusing their position of trust to end up in intimate positions.. any thing else this guy missed,? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ikeC81Man
over a year ago
harrow |
Recently I have removed my company details from my social media accounts mainly because I don't want to be associated it.
I know my contract says I am not allowed to bring the company in to disrepute and I have to be careful as I travel with football - not good when you are seen singing songs
Luckily I have my professional social media profile, which is for my job, then bird-tweet and book of face for banter
Would be on a swingers site sackable probably - however I would say like I had previous the amount of people that used to do illegal drugs at my company was far worse  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This is precisely why I would never send face pics to anyone. I also will only meet someone with verifications I can read who has been on the site for a while. I do not have a high profile job in any way so not concerned about that. However the reason this was published is that newspapers (not my view) would feel that this story was in the public interest... All about police standards of high integrity and setting an example etc. There will be journalists on fab I suspect, looking for a juicy story - we all need to be careful is what I am saying - Remembering swingfields story! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
PS. I. Did meet a dentist a while back on here who did not wish to give verifications and I respected that. However we.met at his dental practice and enjoyed sessions with me tying him to a dentists chair and mild torture (you can imagine the rest!) - and I cautioned him about the wiadom of this. However he was a risk taker and was happy to meet this way. He is not on fab now but I suspect it was more to do with his desire to settle down with someone and have kids. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"When I worked in the jobcentre which is the Department for Work and Pensions we were told and warned and had refresher statements to sign every year about the electronic media policy. We wasn't allowed to say anything on Facebook or twitter or any social media whilst making ourselves known where we work, like I couldn't say something like I hate immigrants whilst having my place of work listed as DWP. Anything that brings your profession into disrepute was a stackable offence. I expect if I posed for pictures wearing the jobcentre plus lanyard and those pictures were on a sex site, I'd be sacked, think it would be the same for any job.
I work for a trade union in employment law. I sigh every day as members come to us facing dismissal for things they've written on social media.
We have to draw their attention to internal policies they sign of on annually, notices about computer usage policy they agree to every time they log in.
Some jobs you can't even tell anyone you're applying and they state not to mention it on social media.
People are very naive if they assume anything they do outside of work is their business. If that were the case we wouldn't need vetting agencies.
For some jobs/professions bringing your employer into disrepute is a sackable offense.
How does having sex bring anyone into disrepute?"
It depends where you work. If your a head teacher of a Catholic girls' school and you have pictures of yourself dressed in the school uniform being spit roasted...I think the school governors wouldn't be impressed! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"When I worked in the jobcentre which is the Department for Work and Pensions we were told and warned and had refresher statements to sign every year about the electronic media policy. We wasn't allowed to say anything on Facebook or twitter or any social media whilst making ourselves known where we work, like I couldn't say something like I hate immigrants whilst having my place of work listed as DWP. Anything that brings your profession into disrepute was a stackable offence. I expect if I posed for pictures wearing the jobcentre plus lanyard and those pictures were on a sex site, I'd be sacked, think it would be the same for any job.
I work for a trade union in employment law. I sigh every day as members come to us facing dismissal for things they've written on social media.
We have to draw their attention to internal policies they sign of on annually, notices about computer usage policy they agree to every time they log in.
Some jobs you can't even tell anyone you're applying and they state not to mention it on social media.
People are very naive if they assume anything they do outside of work is their business. If that were the case we wouldn't need vetting agencies.
For some jobs/professions bringing your employer into disrepute is a sackable offense.
How does having sex bring anyone into disrepute?
It depends where you work. If your a head teacher of a Catholic girls' school and you have pictures of yourself dressed in the school uniform being spit roasted...I think the school governors wouldn't be impressed! "
They'd have wanted to have been included. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think he should get in shit for it if he was just in plane clothes then he should be alwoed to do what he wants but to have a uniform on then post on here stupid stupid man |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
He's entitled to do what he wants in his spare time. But he's not entitled to wear that uniform when he does it.
Yes women have a thing for men in uniform, but its not worth putting your job at risk for.
Clear case of thinking with his dick m'lord. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've got a mixed opinion on this one. I mean there are other online sites which people clearly list themselves as being in the teaching profession which I find more offensive than a policeman on fab. I don't know the ins and outs of this guy's story but he is entitled to a private life. I suppose the point I am making is other sites insist on a profile pic etc so your face is openly out there yet this site doesn't so you can have more privacy if wanted "
why would a teacher on a sex site offend u more than a policeman.why would either offend u lol.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
A number of people have mentioned face pics here. We're quite liberal with our pictures, but we feel that the kinky ones are not obviously recognisable as us, and although we have clear face pics in our 'friends' gallery, if nobody knows who we are or where we work, then those faces are just anonymous faces that could have come from anywhere.
Mrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
