FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Would it be controversial 2
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Because the assumption that all mums have baggy fannies is the same as the assumption all black men have big cocks. Just that - an assumption. I get that you've met mums who should've done more pelvic floor exercises, but you're tarring all mothers with the same brush. You're just as likely to find a mum tight as you are a non mum. It's all a bit daft really. Not that it matters now because you've probably been blocked by all mums on here anyway " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Because the assumption that all mums have baggy fannies is the same as the assumption all black men have big cocks. Just that - an assumption. I get that you've met mums who should've done more pelvic floor exercises, but you're tarring all mothers with the same brush. You're just as likely to find a mum tight as you are a non mum. It's all a bit daft really. Not that it matters now because you've probably been blocked by all mums on here anyway " But why is it 'tarring'? Unlike the OP, some guys may have a preference for more 'manoeuvrability'. Just sayin' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Because the assumption that all mums have baggy fannies is the same as the assumption all black men have big cocks. Just that - an assumption. I get that you've met mums who should've done more pelvic floor exercises, but you're tarring all mothers with the same brush. You're just as likely to find a mum tight as you are a non mum. It's all a bit daft really. Not that it matters now because you've probably been blocked by all mums on here anyway " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!!" Either that or he's got game! Maybe he thinks we will all see it as a challenge | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The mums you've had sex with, when you've found it difficult to climax, did you complain to them? I'm assuming not. Just kinda blows your 'I've had no complaints' theory Yes having children can no doubt affect how a woman feels, but if you have a larger than average tool I doubt you're really finding it difficult, probably more in your head. I've had kids, and have had sex with below average size guys which has been pleasurable for both parties. In short, I don't think mums quite have the bucket fannies you're making out. " Actually i have had the conversation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!!" Just to clarify, I am most definitely not a mum in any sense of the word. Don't judge me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. " Women lie as well you know | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm not 'tarring' anyone. Why do some women see it as a personal attack. It shouldn't be controversial but it is. That's what i want people to think about. It's a question of perceptions. Some make a choice to see it as an attack or tarring. Why? If a women wants a hung guy only. Men don't give to sh*ts. We don't see it as a personal attack. As for assumption. It doean't matter if it is or not. It is my experience. So factually based or not, is of no consequence. " Okay, we get it. You have a preference based on your own experiences, that may or may not be factually correct. Any chance you can accept that you're going to continue to have people disagree with you, instead of starting another thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. Women lie as well you know " I don't [ ] | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Not that it matters now because you've probably been blocked by all mums on here anyway " I was hoping at least a handful would be wanting to prove him wrong by now. You women are so fickle - why not put your money where your mouth is OP: Is it controversial? Any thread that makes it to 175 is. Why is it? Now you're asking us to understand the inner workings of a woman's mind. Surely you realise there is no logic to be found there? Just fluffy kittens (the true answer may be that society has programmed them to be more body-conscious than men) Mr ddc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Not that it matters now because you've probably been blocked by all mums on here anyway I was hoping at least a handful would be wanting to prove him wrong by now. You women are so fickle - why not put your money where your mouth is ... Mr ddc" Mr ddc; did you flunk your anatomy lessons at school? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. Women lie as well you know I don't [ ]" Nor me of course,if a guy is a shit shag I'll tell him . I'm now of to wash my mouth out this place is not good for me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. Women lie as well you know " And we can fake an orgasm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!!" As he doesn't want to meet mothers it's hardly a problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP have you asked the question to yourself that your cock is too small and they can't feel you. Stop blaming the ladies and look at yourself as this is your problem no one else's! " Yeah, OP. Show us your c**k so we can evaluate you too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not read the first thread ...but wow ...his descision has been made and so be it ... Good luck OP " I did and hoped for a second one, it was a good read. This one's gonna get better I think | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!! As he doesn't want to meet mothers it's hardly a problem " Well it is if most of the women on here are mothers,it doesn't leave him many to choose from | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Not that it matters now because you've probably been blocked by all mums on here anyway I was hoping at least a handful would be wanting to prove him wrong by now. You women are so fickle - why not put your money where your mouth is ... Mr ddc Mr ddc; did you flunk your anatomy lessons at school? " I went to a good, strict, almost Catholic, all-boys boarding school. Such things weren't taught. (I'm not sure women were even mentioned ) I learnt everything I know from American hardcore porn mags. (Mrs ddc used to kindly hold them while I worked out what went where) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm not 'tarring' anyone. Why do some women see it as a personal attack. It shouldn't be controversial but it is. That's what i want people to think about. It's a question of perceptions. Some make a choice to see it as an attack or tarring. Why? If a women wants a hung guy only. Men don't give to sh*ts. We don't see it as a personal attack. As for assumption. It doean't matter if it is or not. It is my experience. So factually based or not, is of no consequence. Okay, we get it. You have a preference based on your own experiences, that may or may not be factually correct. Any chance you can accept that you're going to continue to have people disagree with you, instead of starting another thread?" I don't give two hoots if anyone agrees with or not. That isn't the point. You seem to think that i should simply shut up and not continue a discussion. Can't think why personally. It has been the most commented on thread in the past 12hrs in the lounge. Why cut it short? If you are bored with it. I think you know, as an adult, that you neither have to read nor comment. So why do either? You tell me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand - what was the question? Or were you just announcing this? It's your dinkle - stick it where you want." Fleshlight... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There is always Anal OP lol" That's what I said in the first thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand - what was the question? Or were you just announcing this? It's your dinkle - stick it where you want." Erm, he can only 'stick it' where and if it is wanted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm not 'tarring' anyone. Why do some women see it as a personal attack. It shouldn't be controversial but it is. That's what i want people to think about. It's a question of perceptions. Some make a choice to see it as an attack or tarring. Why? If a women wants a hung guy only. Men don't give to sh*ts. We don't see it as a personal attack. As for assumption. It doean't matter if it is or not. It is my experience. So factually based or not, is of no consequence. Okay, we get it. You have a preference based on your own experiences, that may or may not be factually correct. Any chance you can accept that you're going to continue to have people disagree with you, instead of starting another thread? I don't give two hoots if anyone agrees with or not. That isn't the point. You seem to think that i should simply shut up and not continue a discussion. Can't think why personally. It has been the most commented on thread in the past 12hrs in the lounge. Why cut it short? If you are bored with it. I think you know, as an adult, that you neither have to read nor comment. So why do either? You tell me. " It's not a discussion. You're just repeating yourself. You have your _iews, which have been clearly and succinctly expressed. Others haven't agreed. Neither party has budged. Some parrots can talk, but it wouldn't amount to a conversation would it dear? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I don't give two hoots if anyone agrees with or not. " I'm not sure why you're asking for opinions on an open forum then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!! As he doesn't want to meet mothers it's hardly a problem " It is if you make it a problem. I agree though. He's alienated the people he doesn't want to meet??? Not sure how that's fab suicide? It's heavy handed filtering at best. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP have you asked the question to yourself that your cock is too small and they can't feel you. Stop blaming the ladies and look at yourself as this is your problem no one else's! " There is no blame and no accusing and to answer your question. I did ask myself the question. I also had an honest conversation with one of my ex's. We looked at the problem together. As it is important for both parties in a relationship to be fulfilled and i value honesty. No matter how hard hitting it may be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm not 'tarring' anyone. Why do some women see it as a personal attack. It shouldn't be controversial but it is. That's what i want people to think about. It's a question of perceptions. Some make a choice to see it as an attack or tarring. Why? If a women wants a hung guy only. Men don't give to sh*ts. We don't see it as a personal attack. As for assumption. It doean't matter if it is or not. It is my experience. So factually based or not, is of no consequence. Okay, we get it. You have a preference based on your own experiences, that may or may not be factually correct. Any chance you can accept that you're going to continue to have people disagree with you, instead of starting another thread? I don't give two hoots if anyone agrees with or not. That isn't the point. You seem to think that i should simply shut up and not continue a discussion. Can't think why personally. It has been the most commented on thread in the past 12hrs in the lounge. Why cut it short? If you are bored with it. I think you know, as an adult, that you neither have to read nor comment. So why do either? You tell me. It's not a discussion. You're just repeating yourself. You have your _iews, which have been clearly and succinctly expressed. Others haven't agreed. Neither party has budged. Some parrots can talk, but it wouldn't amount to a conversation would it dear? " Lol don't try and patronise me, dear. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's no issue having a preference it's just that there are other factors aside from childbirth that can cause slack muscle tone in the vaginal walls, so you may still not find what you are looking for. Age for example. Also how would some women know what they actually are, I have no idea. For example, I can feel my muscles clenching & find it a struggle to accomodate someone who is VWE. Now does that mean I'm tight or that my vagina has clamped shut at the sight of such a huge penis? " That's cock fright Roxi | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Difficulty to climax ??? Ok let's think about it this way ... a lot of that comes down to how sexually attracted you are to the person rather than how tight a pussy is of how big a cock is ... I have been with guys that even before the 'intercourse' starts and just giving head I have had to keep stopping as they might cum just the same as someone pounding away with a huge tool has done nothing for me !! Maybe if the sexual chemistry was better the 'size' would be the last thing you were thinking of " Have to agree with Scarlet, a guy ejaculates when a signal is sent from the brain down to the cock. Sensation isn't from the touch alone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Difficulty to climax ??? Ok let's think about it this way ... a lot of that comes down to how sexually attracted you are to the person rather than how tight a pussy is of how big a cock is ... I have been with guys that even before the 'intercourse' starts and just giving head I have had to keep stopping as they might cum just the same as someone pounding away with a huge tool has done nothing for me !! Maybe if the sexual chemistry was better the 'size' would be the last thing you were thinking of Have to agree with Scarlet, a guy ejaculates when a signal is sent from the brain down to the cock. Sensation isn't from the touch alone" To the c**k from where??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could be a new Channel 5 Game Show "Fuck a Fanny" then guess (or in OP's case "accurately judge") whether or not she has kids. Sally" Actually lol at that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!! As he doesn't want to meet mothers it's hardly a problem It is if you make it a problem. I agree though. He's alienated the people he doesn't want to meet??? Not sure how that's fab suicide? It's heavy handed filtering at best. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seeking the reason why the majority see it as controversial and different from other preferences. I don't see it as any different. I'm not saying it isn't controversial. I'm saying it shouldn't be. " I got that OP, but you should have titled it "Why is it controversial?" this time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well it makes a change from the incessant hordes who want to meet MILFs. " ....how about milfs who have never had kids......wait... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!! As he doesn't want to meet mothers it's hardly a problem " I beg to differ, As I don't like general sweeping negative statements about anybody I wouldn't be looking to meet the OP. Even if I was childless,single & available, with a fanny the size of a coin slot. Just my thoughts, as the OP has his. H | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can we just now waste the rest of the comments naming animals or something so that it's closed lol " I like otters. I like that they hold hands so they don't lose each other. I'd like to get one and call him Ray. Ray the otter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could be a new Channel 5 Game Show "Fuck a Fanny" then guess (or in OP's case "accurately judge") whether or not she has kids. Sally" Sounds like a plan | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can we just now waste the rest of the comments naming animals or something so that it's closed lol " Technically that isn't allowed. The OP is allowed his own discussion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I noticed the original thread just as I was dropping off last night and thought to myself that it was it was going to be popular OP - I think there might be something Freudian to this. Perhaps you should have a wonder about why you are scared of children " I have children and i love them. I am not scared of kids | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can we just now waste the rest of the comments naming animals or something so that it's closed lol Technically that isn't allowed. The OP is allowed his own discussion. " And badgering him away isn't going to help | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can we just now waste the rest of the comments naming animals or something so that it's closed lol Technically that isn't allowed. The OP is allowed his own discussion. " Also, what's the point? He could start part 3 if he wanted to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lobsters, find a soul mate and link claws for life....never cheat or swing!" But what happens when one half of the couple is cooked up and served in a posh seafood restaurant? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can we just now waste the rest of the comments naming animals or something so that it's closed lol Technically that isn't allowed. The OP is allowed his own discussion. " But there is no discussion, except for what you suggested earlier: "why is it controversial?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lobsters, find a soul mate and link claws for life....never cheat or swing! But what happens when one half of the couple is cooked up and served in a posh seafood restaurant? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Could be a new Channel 5 Game Show "Fuck a Fanny" then guess (or in OP's case "accurately judge") whether or not she has kids. Sally Sounds like a plan " Five guys with cocks from 5-9" five women from small to large "accommodation" all contestants blindfolded and then they have to dress and guess who's bits go with who. Anyone guessing all right gets to take their favorites away for a night of debauchery. Don't see why Mr average cock should have all the fun H | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lobsters, find a soul mate and link claws for life....never cheat or swing! But what happens when one half of the couple is cooked up and served in a posh seafood restaurant? " ... I just ruined it didn't I. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see some have chosen to try and ruin the thread. Not very adult of you. If you don't like the thread. Don't post. Simple. Seems that this may be your only way of resolving or concluding things. Probably why you find this controversial" Lol lighten up OP the said people that hace tried to 'ruin it' with humour have also expressed valid and inciteful opinions on this thread Just saying ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why don't you just ask for tight cunts? " He is not interested in guys | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see some have chosen to try and ruin the thread. Not very adult of you. If you don't like the thread. Don't post. Simple. Seems that this may be your only way of resolving or concluding things. Probably why you find this controversial" OP, Your "want" for a tight fanny is not controversial & neither is my dislike of large cocks. What is incorrect and possibly controversial is your assumption that if you have kids you have a big fanny. It's quite simply utter crap. H | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see some have chosen to try and ruin the thread. Not very adult of you. If you don't like the thread. Don't post. Simple. Seems that this may be your only way of resolving or concluding things. Probably why you find this controversial" I don't understand what it is you are trying to achieve? There is unlikely to be methodologically sound scientific research in this area which can prove your theory one way or another, and so therefore it is simply a matter of opinion surely? You are entitled to your own opinions, however bonkers and controversial they may be to others. The more ridiculous they are, the more controversy you'll create. But you knew all this when you started the threads | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why don't you just ask for tight cunts? He is not interested in guys " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why don't you just ask for tight cunts? He is not interested in guys " Pmsl | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see some have chosen to try and ruin the thread. Not very adult of you. If you don't like the thread. Don't post. Simple. Seems that this may be your only way of resolving or concluding things. Probably why you find this controversial" It's only controversial in your mind, do you think anyone cares who you WANT to meet? If you are of the opinion that all women who haven't had children have tighter foo-foos then knock yourself out looking for them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why don't you just ask for tight cunts? He is not interested in guys ;-)" Thanks, I've got to go change my top now, tea everywhere! H | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why don't you just ask for tight cunts? He is not interested in guys " Yeah, ha! But the point is, he's welcome to ask for a specific attribute, but to join that preference to the assumption that only childless women gave tight vaginas is asinine. Never mind deliberately shit stirring. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!!" I am a mum and wasn't offended. Not everyone springs back into shape, even with pelvic exercises, he may well have met those women and is speaking from his own experience. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am seeking the reason why the majority see it as controversial and different from other preferences. I don't see it as any different. I'm not saying it isn't controversial. I'm saying it shouldn't be. " I'll make it simple for you. No one has a problem with your preference, just the ill informed reason behind it. Example: Person A: "My preference is to not meet black/asian/inuit people." The forum: "That's fine, it's your preference" Person B: "My preference is to not meet black/asian/inuit people because of a woefully misinformed stereotype." The forum? See the previous 250 replies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. " and it's summed up nicely..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. " H | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. " I see your point but I have seen forum posts where women have mentioned a preference for big cocks and there has been some responses along the lines of only sluts like big cocks or you must have a bucket etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. I see your point but I have seen forum posts where women have mentioned a preference for big cocks and there has been some responses along the lines of only sluts like big cocks or you must have a bucket etc. " As have I, and they are usually hastily shot down in flames for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. I see your point but I have seen forum posts where women have mentioned a preference for big cocks and there has been some responses along the lines of only sluts like big cocks or you must have a bucket etc. As have I, and they are usually hastily shot down in flames for it." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. " Man says "I only like a tight fanny". I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Man says "I don't want mothers(vaginal delivery) as all those i've been with aren't tight". Forum goes crazy. Tight fanny isn't exactly the issue here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. Man says "I only like a tight fanny". I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Man says "I don't want mothers(vaginal delivery) as all those i've been with aren't tight". Forum goes crazy. Tight fanny isn't exactly the issue here." But maybe all those he's been with *weren't* tight. So he's basing his preference on personal experience. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. I see your point but I have seen forum posts where women have mentioned a preference for big cocks and there has been some responses along the lines of only sluts like big cocks or you must have a bucket etc. As have I, and they are usually hastily shot down in flames for it." There's a difference between "ooh I love a big cock/big tits/tight cunt " and "you must have this because you're this" though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. Man says "I only like a tight fanny". I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Man says "I don't want mothers(vaginal delivery) as all those i've been with aren't tight". Forum goes crazy. Tight fanny isn't exactly the issue here. But maybe all those he's been with *weren't* tight. So he's basing his preference on personal experience. " "Of the majority, not all, of women with kids that i have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure i get from intercourse is less with a woman that has had children, naturally and not c-section" Right at the top, 3rd paragraph | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. Man says "I only like a tight fanny". I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Man says "I don't want mothers(vaginal delivery) as all those i've been with aren't tight". Forum goes crazy. Tight fanny isn't exactly the issue here. But maybe all those he's been with *weren't* tight. So he's basing his preference on personal experience. "Of the majority, not all, of women with kids that i have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure i get from intercourse is less with a woman that has had children, naturally and not c-section" Right at the top, 3rd paragraph" Ok, how about this. "Of the majority, not all, of the men below 5'10" that I have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure I get from intercourse is less with a man who is smaller than me. Therefore I'm only looking to meet men who are taller than me." I might get a few "we're all the same height lying down" responses, but I doubt it would engender the same collective condemnation of me, suggestions there must be something wrong with me and declarations that I've committed forum suicide. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm not 'tarring' anyone. Why do some women see it as a personal attack. It shouldn't be controversial but it is. That's what i want people to think about. It's a question of perceptions. Some make a choice to see it as an attack or tarring. Why? If a women wants a hung guy only. Men don't give to sh*ts. We don't see it as a personal attack. As for assumption. It doean't matter if it is or not. It is my experience. So factually based or not, is of no consequence. " Your really right you can chose who play with and absolutely able to have a specific preference, as i see it a man who is well endowed the tool speaks for its self and you are able to see it etc but by choosing not to play with women who have children your eliminating (I would say a good 70% of the females on this site bases on a few poor experiences, and if you didn't share your complaint with the woman in question how are you so certain that they we happy with you performance? Lots of assumptions and id say in the end it will be your loss.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!!" Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. Man says "I only like a tight fanny". I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Man says "I don't want mothers(vaginal delivery) as all those i've been with aren't tight". Forum goes crazy. Tight fanny isn't exactly the issue here. But maybe all those he's been with *weren't* tight. So he's basing his preference on personal experience. "Of the majority, not all, of women with kids that i have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure i get from intercourse is less with a woman that has had children, naturally and not c-section" Right at the top, 3rd paragraph Ok, how about this. "Of the majority, not all, of the men below 5'10" that I have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure I get from intercourse is less with a man who is smaller than me. Therefore I'm only looking to meet men who are taller than me." I might get a few "we're all the same height lying down" responses, but I doubt it would engender the same collective condemnation of me, suggestions there must be something wrong with me and declarations that I've committed forum suicide. " Umm.. First of all, I never stated that I agreed with the forum suicide stuff as I'm not one who's ever really used the forums for anything other than events and so, generally speaking, it was never of interest to me... But today, Ii have a lot of free time... I was bored...and Found this... I read through it all... and it was an interesting read, I don't know if you've read through this thread... But if you haven't you should... And more importantly, take note of the OP's responses. My first post on this thread is just above yours I believe. I am not on a wagon of attack or defence or whatever. I respect his preference, but his reasoning behind it is phrased and defended wrongly. Sometimes we all have preferences, not always do we even have reasons for those preferences. But when you put a reason/claim to have a valid justification... Then for God's sake, make sure it's bulletproof before putting it out there... if you don't want attacks, that is. About the height preference, well I don't go with anyone between 5'10 and 6'2... Because we're not all the same height lying down and it affects the "physics of MY chemistry....and biology." So... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok. It seems that it is controversial. However, the comments saying that i am immature, childish, etc etc are pathetic. You ironically say that i am judging but it would seem that you are judging me. I am basing my preference on my own personal experiences. Is it childish or immature? No it's not. It's moronic to think it is and naive to suggest it. It's like saying swinging or bondage is outrageous. Of course they're not. There's nothing wrong with it at all. Just because a majority of people think it's outrageous doesn't mean it is. Ok, my original question should have been 'why?' I conceed that. Why in this day and age are we still making the same mistakes and judgement. We as a species profess to being intelligent, yet from looking at everything happening in the world, we are far from it. In fact we are stupid. Complete imbeciles and we do nothing about it. It's interesting the rational that people use for their actions and words. Right. I'm off to sleep. I've another nightshift later. Everyone, have a great day. " I wonder why you have to specify WHY you want to meet women without children? The ease of making arrangements to meet is a perfectly valid point, and your profile reads well, but I am afraid I would find the phrase 'tight little pussy' so condescending it would be an instant delete at that point, and it begs the question why you feel the need to make such a big deal of this in the first place?? Oh yeah, and speaking as a woman with no kids and a lifetime of horse riding I can assure you I have no axe to grind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well this thread has been enlightening for sure. some good posts by some posters like ruby woo and _iew. some awful posts like the one that wanted to fill the thread up with animal posts so it gets closed which was thankfully discouraged by one of the mods quite quickly as that was pathetic behaviour. The OP hasnt been rude to anyone and seems like an ok guy that from experience just finds that women with children have "looser" bits. sure thats not always the case but in his experience it has been and hes entitled to have that preference without being jumped all over by people who take offence for no reason. good luck OP. " Thanks dude. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. Man says "I only like a tight fanny". I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Man says "I don't want mothers(vaginal delivery) as all those i've been with aren't tight". Forum goes crazy. Tight fanny isn't exactly the issue here. But maybe all those he's been with *weren't* tight. So he's basing his preference on personal experience. "Of the majority, not all, of women with kids that i have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure i get from intercourse is less with a woman that has had children, naturally and not c-section" Right at the top, 3rd paragraph Ok, how about this. "Of the majority, not all, of the men below 5'10" that I have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure I get from intercourse is less with a man who is smaller than me. Therefore I'm only looking to meet men who are taller than me." I might get a few "we're all the same height lying down" responses, but I doubt it would engender the same collective condemnation of me, suggestions there must be something wrong with me and declarations that I've committed forum suicide. Umm.. First of all, I never stated that I agreed with the forum suicide stuff as I'm not one who's ever really used the forums for anything other than events and so, generally speaking, it was never of interest to me... But today, Ii have a lot of free time... I was bored...and Found this... I read through it all... and it was an interesting read, I don't know if you've read through this thread... But if you haven't you should... And more importantly, take note of the OP's responses. My first post on this thread is just above yours I believe. I am not on a wagon of attack or defence or whatever. I respect his preference, but his reasoning behind it is phrased and defended wrongly. Sometimes we all have preferences, not always do we even have reasons for those preferences. But when you put a reason/claim to have a valid justification... Then for God's sake, make sure it's bulletproof before putting it out there... if you don't want attacks, that is. About the height preference, well I don't go with anyone between 5'10 and 6'2... Because we're not all the same height lying down and it affects the "physics of MY chemistry....and biology." So... " I think you're missing my point. I think his preference is probably based on flawed information and is badly expressed. But I've read this and the previous thread in full and the double standards being demonstrated are blatant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most preferences will offend someone, we're all here for our own pleasure so why make allowances? Please don't take this as a attack on your manhood but I wonder if op has some penis desensitization, very common, easy to test for and would require more friction to accomplish an orgasm. " This may be something i can look into. I do wank a lot! Could this cause it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My wife has a lovely tight pussy. Lots of veris from satisfied guys too " Do they also have to complete a 10 point customer satisfaction survey questionnaire? And more to the point, do you use Excel or a hierarchical database to collate the results | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most preferences will offend someone, we're all here for our own pleasure so why make allowances? Please don't take this as a attack on your manhood but I wonder if op has some penis desensitization, very common, easy to test for and would require more friction to accomplish an orgasm. This may be something i can look into. I do wank a lot! Could this cause it? " It can indeed but there can be other factors too. Give it a Google, easy at home test and advice at how to increase sensitivity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. Man says "I only like a tight fanny". I don't think anyone would have a problem with that. Man says "I don't want mothers(vaginal delivery) as all those i've been with aren't tight". Forum goes crazy. Tight fanny isn't exactly the issue here. But maybe all those he's been with *weren't* tight. So he's basing his preference on personal experience. "Of the majority, not all, of women with kids that i have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure i get from intercourse is less with a woman that has had children, naturally and not c-section" Right at the top, 3rd paragraph Ok, how about this. "Of the majority, not all, of the men below 5'10" that I have been with. I have found that the sensation and pleasure I get from intercourse is less with a man who is smaller than me. Therefore I'm only looking to meet men who are taller than me." I might get a few "we're all the same height lying down" responses, but I doubt it would engender the same collective condemnation of me, suggestions there must be something wrong with me and declarations that I've committed forum suicide. Umm.. First of all, I never stated that I agreed with the forum suicide stuff as I'm not one who's ever really used the forums for anything other than events and so, generally speaking, it was never of interest to me... But today, Ii have a lot of free time... I was bored...and Found this... I read through it all... and it was an interesting read, I don't know if you've read through this thread... But if you haven't you should... And more importantly, take note of the OP's responses. My first post on this thread is just above yours I believe. I am not on a wagon of attack or defence or whatever. I respect his preference, but his reasoning behind it is phrased and defended wrongly. Sometimes we all have preferences, not always do we even have reasons for those preferences. But when you put a reason/claim to have a valid justification... Then for God's sake, make sure it's bulletproof before putting it out there... if you don't want attacks, that is. About the height preference, well I don't go with anyone between 5'10 and 6'2... Because we're not all the same height lying down and it affects the "physics of MY chemistry....and biology." So... I think you're missing my point. I think his preference is probably based on flawed information and is badly expressed. But I've read this and the previous thread in full and the double standards being demonstrated are blatant. " I believe I do get your point. Your original point was questioning/pondering why he, the OP ( a guy) is getting attacked for stating his preferences.. And why a lady say "... big cock ...." or you could say "...over 5'10..." and you wouldn't get total attacks and stuff... I do not agree with the double standards... But when someone states on his profile, "tight little cunts" and in the opening post, about his "measurements", etc. Then that is what brings up the debate. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think anyone would attack anyone, male or female for having preferences.... And although like I said, I don't agree with a lot of the responses, the OP's phrasing sends a lot of wrong messages....Maybe unintentionally... But the fact is they do.... And I believe that's the whole basis of the... controversy. Yes, there's an obvious double standard... But it's interpreted as a generalisation, after the fact... In a war which is irrelevant... There's an obvious double standard, there always is, it'll always be there. But you have to see the obvious fact that a lot of what was stated was wrongly phrased/redundant... Except the forum war was the actual intention. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cock pic up for anyone who wants to have a nosey. Not that it makes a difference. " You call thaaaat big??? THIS is big | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You are free to have any preferences you want. We all are However i find it hard to believe that women who have had children have a less tight foo, every women i know does pelvic exercises after having a baby and we are very elastic in that area obviously I know (from being told in the past) that im tight and i have given birth naturally twice. Maybe you were just unlucky in who you met or maybe the problem lies with you ? Good luck though as you have most likely allienated (sp?) most women on Fab now lol." "You have most likely aliented most women on fab now lol" Hardly as only a very tiny percentage of fab use the forums...id say less than 10% but thats just a guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I believe I do get your point. Your original point was questioning/pondering why he, the OP ( a guy) is getting attacked for stating his preferences.. And why a lady say "... big cock ...." or you could say "...over 5'10..." and you wouldn't get total attacks and stuff... I do not agree with the double standards... But when someone states on his profile, "tight little cunts" and in the opening post, about his "measurements", etc. Then that is what brings up the debate. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think anyone would attack anyone, male or female for having preferences.... And although like I said, I don't agree with a lot of the responses, the OP's phrasing sends a lot of wrong messages....Maybe unintentionally... But the fact is they do.... And I believe that's the whole basis of the... controversy. Yes, there's an obvious double standard... But it's interpreted as a generalisation, after the fact... In a war which is irrelevant... There's an obvious double standard, there always is, it'll always be there. But you have to see the obvious fact that a lot of what was stated was wrongly phrased/redundant... Except the forum war was the actual intention. " I don't see a "war", just a whole lotta butthurt responses to a badly worded preference. Which was probably the intention behind the thread(s). Just because a double standard is there doesn't mean you have to go along with it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""I do not agree with the double standards... But when someone states on his profile, "tight little cunts" and in the opening post, about his "measurements", etc. Then that is what brings up the debate." I do not state "tight little cunts" on my profile. If you are going to quote. Quote. As for "measurements". I briefly mentioned size due to a lot of comments suggesting it was all down to cock size. Which i don't agree with. The real reason is purely from a sensation pount of _iew. I'm not getting the sensation during sex. " You could specify that you only want "tight little cunts" you're perfectly entitled to state what your preferences are, I applaud people that have preferences, I have many. But you should just keep it at that, state you want tight fannies and then you'll get people with tight fannies, you could say don't want anybody that's had a vaginal birth and in doing so you could dismiss lots of tight fannies, you could have a woman that hasn't had a child yet still has a slack fanny. Do you see what I'm trying to explain? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""I do not agree with the double standards... But when someone states on his profile, "tight little cunts" and in the opening post, about his "measurements", etc. Then that is what brings up the debate." I do not state "tight little cunts" on my profile. If you are going to quote. Quote. As for "measurements". I briefly mentioned size due to a lot of comments suggesting it was all down to cock size. Which i don't agree with. The real reason is purely from a sensation pount of _iew. I'm not getting the sensation during sex. You could specify that you only want "tight little cunts" you're perfectly entitled to state what your preferences are, I applaud people that have preferences, I have many. But you should just keep it at that, state you want tight fannies and then you'll get people with tight fannies, you could say don't want anybody that's had a vaginal birth and in doing so you could dismiss lots of tight fannies, you could have a woman that hasn't had a child yet still has a slack fanny. Do you see what I'm trying to explain?" Yes i do and thank you. I am purely going on my experience. The thread is NOT intended to cause argument but to engage in a discussion. I thank you for the point you are making. Maybe it has been worded wrongly but it is just an honest reason. So if i just put "tight pussy" would that be less controversial? I'm not convinced but to have this discussion is to see what others think. This may be a problem i have physically with sensation. I can't say either but it is something i haven't thought about. So i thank you and others constructive comments on the thread. It is very much appreciated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""I do not agree with the double standards... But when someone states on his profile, "tight little cunts" and in the opening post, about his "measurements", etc. Then that is what brings up the debate." I do not state "tight little cunts" on my profile. If you are going to quote. Quote. As for "measurements". I briefly mentioned size due to a lot of comments suggesting it was all down to cock size. Which i don't agree with. The real reason is purely from a sensation pount of _iew. I'm not getting the sensation during sex. " My mistake, cunt, pussy, fanny... Cunt = Swear word apparently. Mea culpa on that one. Let me explain to you what I am referring to... I have read both threads... You continuously say, (so i don't get accused of misquoting again...) something along the lines of " I don't mean to be a dick....... I have come to this conclusion based on my experience." It means that yes, you did experience what you did experience... And based on your experience, with the mothers you've been with, there's been a not so tight sensation with most of them. As you said, it's a conclusion generated based on your experience. A conclusion. You don't have to (for lack of a better word) justify the size of your cock.."bigger than average" or whatever... as all you're doing is giving even more openings to... "it's the size of your cock". Big, small, average... Tight, bucket, swimming pool... It's all relative. I'm an advocate of sensation... So, yes, go for it... i personally don't think it generally speaking has much to do with childbirth...but that's my own opinion/experience. In general, like I said, your phrasing, and some responses haven't been to your advantage... that's all I'm gonna say. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I believe I do get your point. Your original point was questioning/pondering why he, the OP ( a guy) is getting attacked for stating his preferences.. And why a lady say "... big cock ...." or you could say "...over 5'10..." and you wouldn't get total attacks and stuff... I do not agree with the double standards... But when someone states on his profile, "tight little cunts" and in the opening post, about his "measurements", etc. Then that is what brings up the debate. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think anyone would attack anyone, male or female for having preferences.... And although like I said, I don't agree with a lot of the responses, the OP's phrasing sends a lot of wrong messages....Maybe unintentionally... But the fact is they do.... And I believe that's the whole basis of the... controversy. Yes, there's an obvious double standard... But it's interpreted as a generalisation, after the fact... In a war which is irrelevant... There's an obvious double standard, there always is, it'll always be there. But you have to see the obvious fact that a lot of what was stated was wrongly phrased/redundant... Except the forum war was the actual intention. I don't see a "war", just a whole lotta butthurt responses to a badly worded preference. Which was probably the intention behind the thread(s). Just because a double standard is there doesn't mean you have to go along with it. " If that was a personal statement, I have never gone along with the double standard... If that wasn't, then yes... Sure, just because it exists doesn't mean one must go along with it. The original question of this thread... was if it will be controversial, to... based on a "controversial 2nd point" It is a controversial 2nd point for obvious reasons. The preference wasn't necessarily badly worded... The (possibly redundant) justification was what was badly worded... and the reason for "a whole lotta butthurt" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand - what was the question? Or were you just announcing this? It's your dinkle - stick it where you want. Fleshlight... " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""I do not agree with the double standards... But when someone states on his profile, "tight little cunts" and in the opening post, about his "measurements", etc. Then that is what brings up the debate." I do not state "tight little cunts" on my profile. If you are going to quote. Quote. As for "measurements". I briefly mentioned size due to a lot of comments suggesting it was all down to cock size. Which i don't agree with. The real reason is purely from a sensation pount of _iew. I'm not getting the sensation during sex. You could specify that you only want "tight little cunts" you're perfectly entitled to state what your preferences are, I applaud people that have preferences, I have many. But you should just keep it at that, state you want tight fannies and then you'll get people with tight fannies, you could say don't want anybody that's had a vaginal birth and in doing so you could dismiss lots of tight fannies, you could have a woman that hasn't had a child yet still has a slack fanny. Do you see what I'm trying to explain? Yes i do and thank you. I am purely going on my experience. The thread is NOT intended to cause argument but to engage in a discussion. I thank you for the point you are making. Maybe it has been worded wrongly but it is just an honest reason. So if i just put "tight pussy" would that be less controversial? I'm not convinced but to have this discussion is to see what others think. This may be a problem i have physically with sensation. I can't say either but it is something i haven't thought about. So i thank you and others constructive comments on the thread. It is very much appreciated. " I think if you say you want "tight pussy only" that would be more accurate. You'll still put people's backs out that don't have a tight fanny, but they are people you don't want to meet anyway so it shouldn't really be a problem. I am very specific about the penis size that I like, I want minimum 7 inches in length with a circumference of at least 5.5 inches. I like to look at willys that size, they're nice to hold in your hand and whatever, I also like to feel the sharp slightly painful stretchy feeling when it first goes inside me, it's my kink, I get off on it, ow, oooh, you're hurting me, whilst the guy still continues to fuck. It's like a role play thing then, a normal or smaller sized penis would still make me cum I expect (I've never tried one) but it's just what I enjoy, it a preference. Be true to yourself and have preferences, state them in a way that doesn't upset the camp that you aren't looking for and nobody should feel put out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it's as if you have no chemistry with your meets other than anatomically ?" it's nothing to do with the mental chemistry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I don't see a "war", just a whole lotta butthurt responses to a badly worded preference. Which was probably the intention behind the thread(s). Just because a double standard is there doesn't mean you have to go along with it. " It's not a double standard though, you're comparing apples and oranges. Stating a preference for BBC is not the same as coming out with something nonsense like "I don't meet bald men as they have small willies" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I don't see a "war", just a whole lotta butthurt responses to a badly worded preference. Which was probably the intention behind the thread(s). Just because a double standard is there doesn't mean you have to go along with it. It's not a double standard though, you're comparing apples and oranges. Stating a preference for BBC is not the same as coming out with something nonsense like "I don't meet bald men as they have small willies"" Not really. Saying you only (in your own experience) get sexual pleasure from big cocks, so I only meet men with size 12 and above feet, would be a more accurate comparison. Based on a combination of personal experience and nonsense science. The double standard arises from the fact that if I stated that as my preference for those reasons, I wouldn't be met with the response he's been. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I don't see a "war", just a whole lotta butthurt responses to a badly worded preference. Which was probably the intention behind the thread(s). Just because a double standard is there doesn't mean you have to go along with it. It's not a double standard though, you're comparing apples and oranges. Stating a preference for BBC is not the same as coming out with something nonsense like "I don't meet bald men as they have small willies" Not really. Saying you only (in your own experience) get sexual pleasure from big cocks, so I only meet men with size 12 and above feet, would be a more accurate comparison. Based on a combination of personal experience and nonsense science. The double standard arises from the fact that if I stated that as my preference for those reasons, I wouldn't be met with the response he's been." Which would be fine if he stated he just wanted to meet women with tight vaginas. He didn't. He said he wouldn't meet women that have had kids because he didn't like flicking a grain of rice into space. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Which would be fine if he stated he just wanted to meet women with tight vaginas. He didn't. He said he wouldn't meet women that have had kids because he didn't like flicking a grain of rice into space." Where did he say that? Could you quote the post? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The original post that sparked all this off? I was paraphrasing but this is it "So, would it be controversial to only want to meet women without children. For two reasons. 1/ easier to arrange meets 2/ tighter pussy Discuss....."" I'm not seeing anything about grains of rice or space here. Neither are any of those statements offensive. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cock pic up for anyone who wants to have a nosey. Not that it makes a difference. " Ah. Now we see what the problem is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Neither are any of those statements offensive. " It's not offensive, just woefully misinformed and peabrained | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Neither are any of those statements offensive. It's not offensive, just woefully misinformed and peabrained " I've never disagreed with that. But offensive it is not, which is why the double standard I described is alive and kicking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" During female arousal, the muscles contract, gradually increasing until they do so maximally during orgasm. Maybe these women just weren't that turned on? " That's what I was thinking or, and apologies if this has already been mentioned, whether the OP has a small cock | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Cock pic up for anyone who wants to have a nosey. Not that it makes a difference. Ah. Now we see what the problem is " That's cruel, whereas my own comment that provoked OP's response was only meant as 'throwaway humour'. But yes, contrary to my own beliefs, it seems I am bigger than 'bigger than average'. Lol, if only.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Neither are any of those statements offensive. It's not offensive, just woefully misinformed and peabrained I've never disagreed with that. But offensive it is not, which is why the double standard I described is alive and kicking. " It's not offensive. It's just touched a nerve with some & others have jumped on the 'outrage' bandwagon. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Man says "I only like a tight fanny". Outraged forum says "you must have a small penis". Woman says "I only like a big cock". Outraged forum wouldn't dare suggest that's because she has a loose fanny. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. Women lie as well you know " whats that film with Meg Ryan again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!! Either that or he's got game! Maybe he thinks we will all see it as a challenge " Maybe he has just got the balls to say it as he actually sees it and isn't trying to do the fab thing and attempt to be all things to all men/women? Just a possibility? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!! Either that or he's got game! Maybe he thinks we will all see it as a challenge Maybe he has just got the balls to say it as he actually sees it and isn't trying to do the fab thing and attempt to be all things to all men/women? Just a possibility?" Absolutely! And good for him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. Women lie as well you know whats that film with Meg Ryan again? " When Harry met Sally ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. Women lie as well you know whats that film with Meg Ryan again? When Harry met Sally ? " Yes!! Yes, yes.....yesssss yes yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread will forever live in my memory as "The wizards spell" Where upon you do a chant, wave your stick in a big black cauldron, and people disappear. All its done is pointed out the double standards and the parallel world of FAB Fair play though OP for jumping over the parapet bollock naked into the awaiting horde. " Agree. I love it when threads like this come up as it really gets people talking about stuff that lots of people think to themselves. Personally I don't like any labels or presumptions about me and my body but I also don't project such things into others. I'd never refer to a woman as BBW or assume that a black guy is hung, but lots of people do those things yet feel offended when the same is done to them (or specifically their gentialia) so it's an interesting topic. Well done OP | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol op has just committed fabicide as a lot of us are mums!!!! Either that or he's got game! Maybe he thinks we will all see it as a challenge Maybe he has just got the balls to say it as he actually sees it and isn't trying to do the fab thing and attempt to be all things to all men/women? Just a possibility?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I would like to state, that the women i have been with have all been able to climax and have loved sex with me. They have had no compliants. Women lie as well you know whats that film with Meg Ryan again? When Harry met Sally ? Yes!! Yes, yes.....yesssss yes yes " [ heaven forbid ] | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |