 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
In request to AKAs thread ...
I'm currently reading Essentialism by Greg McKewon.....
The application of a more selective criteria .......essentialism versus non-essentialism.
As Fab can be presented as a smorgasbord and also a long list of what we don't eat .....
Would we benefit from reconfiguring our profiles to display a more selective criteria in order to experience a more enjoyable set of emotions - better sex.......?
Physiological response creates our arousal and then we read the profile thus pics are vital... to relay our desire
Pics - to arouse (if all profile pics are cocks/bums/boobs - the arousal is minimised)
Criteria - only list of what we love (if it's a long list of don'ts we switch off)
Thoughts?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Our nervous system is going to be initiating our arousal.
I'm all for the patchwork quilt or smorgasbord effect that collective users create, rather than something more akin to a unified system.
This way you get to perceive a good amount about others - whether to ignore or consider sending your FAF requests. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Our nervous system is going to be initiating our arousal.
I'm all for the patchwork quilt or smorgasbord effect that collective users create, rather than something more akin to a unified system.
This way you get to perceive a good amount about others - whether to ignore or consider sending your FAF requests."
AGREED  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We have a few dont's, we need to make some deal breakers clear.
But we feel we make our likes and interests clear, but people sneer at long profiles so you can't win. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
