FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Conspiracy theories
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes some of the 9/11 ones are crazy but there have being conspiracy theories that have actually came out too be true and government have admitted too for example im amercia where injecting African American men with syphilis! Also project mk ultra witch was ran from 1950 too 1973 witch conducted Behavioural experiments " ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the incident. I think the death of Princess Di was very suspicious..... " Very. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Common scene or not there have being ones that years down the line have proven too be true alot of the 9/11 ones are mad but some are very intresting and as a civil engineer does not seem as clear cut as was explained what happened " I've seen a lot of stuff on 9/11 and it all points to an inside job. [Doorbell] Hold on, there's someone at the door. Be right back. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's loads about 9/11 saying it was all set up right from the construction of the twin towers and lots of hints of the inpending doom in films any clocks seen in big budget films have the hands pointing at 9-11 loads about it onlind other conspiracy theories include hitler never died and the nazis cloned him and also 300 years of history were made up because a roman emperor wanted to be ruler in the year 1000ad but it was only 700ad so he had his noteries make up a load of stuff not saying i think any of it is true i wnduldn't even call them theories as the evidence to back them up is very shakey" totaly agree that some are complete waffle but there has being alot of so called what government and people in power have said are just a conspiracy amd years later have come out too be true so i do not believe alot of them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes some of the 9/11 ones are crazy but there have being conspiracy theories that have actually came out too be true and government have admitted too for example im amercia where injecting African American men with syphilis! Also project mk ultra witch was ran from 1950 too 1973 witch conducted Behavioural experiments " Both total nonsense......what proof? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Common scene or not there have being ones that years down the line have proven too be true alot of the 9/11 ones are mad but some are very intresting and as a civil engineer does not seem as clear cut as was explained what happened I've seen a lot of stuff on 9/11 and it all points to an inside job. [Doorbell] Hold on, there's someone at the door. Be right back. ![]() well would not he the first time American government has killed its own people too start a war and building 7 just falling and in a fashion of a controlled demolition all points too it is fishy as fuck | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers " I have a theory that they are all made up by a secret government agency to fool us into thinking that other government agencies are more effective than they really are. I mean, the MOD *might* be secretly testing captured alien technology, but if they can't manage to design a landrover that doesn't get blown up, an aircraft carrier that has planes or a destroyer that doesn't blow a fuse whenever you turn on the missile defence system, it doesn't inspire much confidence... ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes some of the 9/11 ones are crazy but there have being conspiracy theories that have actually came out too be true and government have admitted too for example im amercia where injecting African American men with syphilis! Also project mk ultra witch was ran from 1950 too 1973 witch conducted Behavioural experiments Both total nonsense......what proof?" go Google it they are proven and project mk ultra was admited by bill Clinton and apoliged too who ever was involved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Contrails are another one Google it" do you mean contrails as in the so called fuel that is left behind from planes?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it " well that had never being admitted by us government the two I mentioned have being admited by Presidents | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Contrails are another one Google it do you mean contrails as in the so called fuel that is left behind from planes??" yep thats an interesting one the composition of jet fuel has changed making them more visable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Contrails are another one Google it do you mean contrails as in the so called fuel that is left behind from planes??" Chemtrails? Contrails are just water vapour I think. There was a pilot who actually testified in a U.S court recently, saying that he was flying a specially designed plane that emitted chemicals. Check out the vid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Contrails are another one Google it do you mean contrails as in the so called fuel that is left behind from planes?? yep thats an interesting one the composition of jet fuel has changed making them more visable" well also something that is not admitted but is intresting there is loads out there but by far mk ultra is the most intresting in my option | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers " I believe I may be a non believer although there is no smoke without fire, what's good for the goose is good for the gander and it's a game of two halves, unbelievable Jeff. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it well that had never being admitted by us government the two I mentioned have being admited by Presidents " its never been admitted and never will be in our life timd but the shot he took has been tested from a 5 storey high scaffold with the exact same type of rifle aiming at a stationary target at the same distance they had to get 3 shots in 6 seconds not one of the pro army snipers that were invited to try succeeded | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I believe in them, hitler never died in the bunker, he escaped to brazil, it was his double who died." I dont know about that now I woukd be iffy on that iam strictly talking about ones that have being admitted too be true alot of things happen that isnt shown too the public | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it well that had never being admitted by us government the two I mentioned have being admited by Presidents its never been admitted and never will be in our life timd but the shot he took has been tested from a 5 storey high scaffold with the exact same type of rifle aiming at a stationary target at the same distance they had to get 3 shots in 6 seconds not one of the pro army snipers that were invited to try succeeded" yes I totaly agree and susposedly Oswald was a unwilling victim of project mk ultra | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers " I believe that Boris Johnson is a fiction,it is,in fact,a panda in a Boris suit! ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved." I really dont know if it's that clear cut because that is very sloppy if it was done that way I bekieve there was another shooter and Oswald was a scapegoat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. I really dont know if it's that clear cut because that is very sloppy if it was done that way I bekieve there was another shooter and Oswald was a scapegoat " Saw another video where it shows the gun in the driver's hand. Couldn't believe what I was seeing. Will see if I can find it somewhere. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved." in the days before hd made a speach saying he was going to out a secret society then bang he's dead and then lee harvey oswald gets shot dead mega fishy!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. I really dont know if it's that clear cut because that is very sloppy if it was done that way I bekieve there was another shooter and Oswald was a scapegoat Saw another video where it shows the gun in the driver's hand. Couldn't believe what I was seeing. Will see if I can find it somewhere. ![]() look up project mk ultra that will amaze you man and even videis of bill Clinton apoilagise about it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. in the days before hd made a speach saying he was going to out a secret society then bang he's dead and then lee harvey oswald gets shot dead mega fishy!!" as fishy as a day at a fish mongers lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it well that had never being admitted by us government the two I mentioned have being admited by Presidents its never been admitted and never will be in our life timd but the shot he took has been tested from a 5 storey high scaffold with the exact same type of rifle aiming at a stationary target at the same distance they had to get 3 shots in 6 seconds not one of the pro army snipers that were invited to try succeeded" Actually it has been reproduced, exactly, many times; it's a very easy shot, even given that there were some minor faults in the weapon. Bearing in mind that the head shot was, in effect a " miss" ; he would have been going for a second body shot, not a head shot; that was a "lucky accident" for him, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the incident. I think the death of Princess Di was very suspicious..... " ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the incident. I think the death of Princess Di was very suspicious..... ![]() Rubbish; just a crap driver speeding and losing control. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it " I watched a programme which pointed to an accidental misfire from a she ret service agent sitting on the back of the following convertible, hushed up to hide how inept the SS were & obviously no one would believe it wasn't an assassination.. My own one is the Philadelphia experiment. I reckon something like it probably has happened. UFO's are also hushed up not because they are aliens but because they are us from the future..IMO travelling in time will come before travelling into deep space.. S | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it well that had never being admitted by us government the two I mentioned have being admited by Presidents its never been admitted and never will be in our life timd but the shot he took has been tested from a 5 storey high scaffold with the exact same type of rifle aiming at a stationary target at the same distance they had to get 3 shots in 6 seconds not one of the pro army snipers that were invited to try succeeded Actually it has been reproduced, exactly, many times; it's a very easy shot, even given that there were some minor faults in the weapon. Bearing in mind that the head shot was, in effect a " miss" ; he would have been going for a second body shot, not a head shot; that was a "lucky accident" for him, " 3 shots in less than 6 seconds at distance on a moving target with a bolt action rifle that was old by 1960's standards is not an easy shot. Thats take aim fire deal with the recoil reload and take aim again and fire. Each shot hitting the target with less than 2 seconds inbetween if you have ever tried using a bolt action rifle and i have on a gun range you will understand how hard that is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it I watched a programme which pointed to an accidental misfire from a she ret service agent sitting on the back of the following convertible, hushed up to hide how inept the SS were & obviously no one would believe it wasn't an assassination.. My own one is the Philadelphia experiment. I reckon something like it probably has happened. UFO's are also hushed up not because they are aliens but because they are us from the future..IMO travelling in time will come before travelling into deep space.. I S" I personally think the moon landings where faked | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The 9/11 pentagon one is 100% odd to say the least, the hole from a Boeing 757 would be pretty wide, whereas pictures show it was more like a missile...." 9/11 has more proof too suggest a inside job than a terrorist attack lot of factors dont add up only one in my eyes a sceneless waste of innocent lifes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. in the days before hd made a speach saying he was going to out a secret society then bang he's dead and then lee harvey oswald gets shot dead mega fishy!!" The secret society was Rothschilds who just happen to be the most powerful people on the planet and are in control of the global banking system. Anyone who tries to get in their way ends up as a corpse, President Kennedy had the balls to stand up to them and moved to put the production of money in government control. Days later he was dead and control of the federal reserve and therefore the production of capital was back under the ownership and control of Rothschilds. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The 9/11 pentagon one is 100% odd to say the least, the hole from a Boeing 757 would be pretty wide, whereas pictures show it was more like a missile...." Having watched the events unfold live on that sad day, The fireball engulfing the building when the second plane hit was aviation fuel and not a high explosive.. Also the calls from people on other flights that day to loved ones reporting of the flight being hijacked by terrorists confirm the whole thing was in fact a sick act of terrorism. No matter how you look at it, the facts point to that.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The 9/11 pentagon one is 100% odd to say the least, the hole from a Boeing 757 would be pretty wide, whereas pictures show it was more like a missile.... 9/11 has more proof too suggest a inside job than a terrorist attack lot of factors dont add up only one in my eyes a sceneless waste of innocent lifes " i agree more than 3000 innocent people killed just to generate hatred | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The 9/11 pentagon one is 100% odd to say the least, the hole from a Boeing 757 would be pretty wide, whereas pictures show it was more like a missile.... 9/11 has more proof too suggest a inside job than a terrorist attack lot of factors dont add up only one in my eyes a sceneless waste of innocent lifes i agree more than 3000 innocent people killed just to generate hatred" ya and not there first time either Vietnam anotger example that springs too mind | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the incident. I think the death of Princess Di was very suspicious..... " Do you read The Express? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. in the days before hd made a speach saying he was going to out a secret society then bang he's dead and then lee harvey oswald gets shot dead mega fishy!! as fishy as a day at a fish mongers lol" "From the back and to the left..." ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. " The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers I believe that Boris Johnson is a fiction,it is,in fact,a panda in a Boris suit! ![]() I thought he was an alien under his disguise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I believe in them, hitler never died in the bunker, he escaped to brazil, it was his double who died." Oh LOL Everyone knows that the surviving Nazis escaped to the moon... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py_IndUbcxc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() well evidence too go both ways on the moon landing argiemebts and alot of things are hidden by government and people domt speak up due too fear just my own personal option dude | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. in the days before hd made a speach saying he was going to out a secret society then bang he's dead and then lee harvey oswald gets shot dead mega fishy!! The secret society was Rothschilds who just happen to be the most powerful people on the planet and are in control of the global banking system. Anyone who tries to get in their way ends up as a corpse, President Kennedy had the balls to stand up to them and moved to put the production of money in government control. Days later he was dead and control of the federal reserve and therefore the production of capital was back under the ownership and control of Rothschilds. " they own the central bank with their dodgy economy which is based on a massive "i owe you" they have used america and the united nations as pawns to set up shop in iraq afghanistan lybia syria and sudan the only countries without a central bank are iran cuba and north korea and they are next | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. in the days before hd made a speach saying he was going to out a secret society then bang he's dead and then lee harvey oswald gets shot dead mega fishy!! The secret society was Rothschilds who just happen to be the most powerful people on the planet and are in control of the global banking system. Anyone who tries to get in their way ends up as a corpse, President Kennedy had the balls to stand up to them and moved to put the production of money in government control. Days later he was dead and control of the federal reserve and therefore the production of capital was back under the ownership and control of Rothschilds. they own the central bank with their dodgy economy which is based on a massive "i owe you" they have used america and the united nations as pawns to set up shop in iraq afghanistan lybia syria and sudan the only countries without a central bank are iran cuba and north korea and they are next" spot in my man ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() Right... So how about the Russians or a good telescope, even if you believe that thousands of people who worked for NASA kept their gobs shut? Seriously, with a good telescope you can SEE the moon landing evidence with your own eyes. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() I dont own a telescope lol but yes you have vaild points just i find it hars too digest is all but nit a particular thing i have looked into in depth | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() Trust me, or better yet, pop round to mine and have a look through my 105mm refracting telescope. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() ![]() well I believe if I domt trust media governments random people offering me toi look at there telescope aren't too be trusted ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" pop round to mine and have a look through my 105mm refracting telescope. ![]() Don't fall for it OP. Here, fancy a sweet instead? I have some puppies you can come and see... ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I'm not the government, dude. I just have a half decent telescope and can help put this one to bed so you can go back to who killed Princess Di. Think of it as public service ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" pop round to mine and have a look through my 105mm refracting telescope. ![]() ![]() ![]() that sound a little Gary glitter ha but i do like dogs and sweets ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() well how princess did died is no concern too me ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Generally a non-believer. All major stories/events have unusual, hard to explain elements. People understandably question those, but then come up with an alternative theory that has even more holes in it. The Diana ones seem the amongst the most unlikely ones to me. That's just my opinion obviously. Would Mossad/the Palace or whoever wanted her dead seriously have chosen that method? An act as simple and commonplace as putting a seatbelt on would have caused it to fail (unless of course, the agents in the car told her not to and were on a mission involving their own self-destruction (see first paragraph))." Well put. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mr ddc that sound a little Gary glitter ha but i do like dogs and sweets ![]() I was aiming more for this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=85UlWqk-YKI ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you want to hear an outrageous conspiracy theory that millions believe in ask a Creationist. Or pick a religion. People will always twist the "facts" to suit the belief rather than the more logical opposite. Go figure...perhaps you can come up with a suitable conspiracy theory to explain why! ![]() ![]() religion is a load of bollox plain and simple you live doe and gomin tgr ground too become worm food | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mr ddc that sound a little Gary glitter ha but i do like dogs and sweets ![]() ![]() haha and i always didn't like cats perhaps I will buy one today save me geting bundled into the back of a van ?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mr ddc that sound a little Gary glitter ha but i do like dogs and sweets ![]() ![]() More like this...? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otXIaIxkWTI ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. I really dont know if it's that clear cut because that is very sloppy if it was done that way I bekieve there was another shooter and Oswald was a scapegoat " It's really not the driver. The first time I saw it, I thought it looked incredibly like that, but it's not. It's the sun shining on the top of his head. It's nonsense. Also - regarding JFK, he was definitely hit from behind for some of the shots. The trajectory leads back to the Book Depository, so someone managed to fire off successful shoots from there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mr ddc that sound a little Gary glitter ha but i do like dogs and sweets ![]() ![]() ![]() haha ffs man | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mr ddc that sound a little Gary glitter ha but i do like dogs and sweets ![]() ![]() ![]() Maybe this one? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1KvgtEnABY | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mr ddc that sound a little Gary glitter ha but i do like dogs and sweets ![]() ![]() ![]() is this abduct paddy day ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes some of the 9/11 ones are crazy but there have being conspiracy theories that have actually came out too be true and government have admitted too for example im amercia where injecting African American men with syphilis! Also project mk ultra witch was ran from 1950 too 1973 witch conducted Behavioural experiments Both total nonsense......what proof? go Google it they are proven and project mk ultra was admited by bill Clinton and apoliged too who ever was involved " Bill clinton. The guy who lied under oath? ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes some of the 9/11 ones are crazy but there have being conspiracy theories that have actually came out too be true and government have admitted too for example im amercia where injecting African American men with syphilis! Also project mk ultra witch was ran from 1950 too 1973 witch conducted Behavioural experiments Both total nonsense......what proof? go Google it they are proven and project mk ultra was admited by bill Clinton and apoliged too who ever was involved Bill clinton. The guy who lied under oath? ![]() big difference lieing about geting iff with a intern too behavioural experments on unwilling citizens but alos the cia and places where these experiments where done admitted it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... " that's excately it so with them coming out woukd put doubt in your head i personally think 9/11 will be eventually admited as a inside job | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... " I thought the Gulf of Tonkin incident actually happened, although not in the way that either side claimed? ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... that's excately it so with them coming out woukd put doubt in your head i personally think 9/11 will be eventually admited as a inside job" Why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... " One of my fave's is Hollow Earth Theory. This nonsense gained increasing traction for 200 years. Even the Nazis sent an expedition ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... that's excately it so with them coming out woukd put doubt in your head i personally think 9/11 will be eventually admited as a inside job " I disagree. .. far too many variables, now IF you were to say the Military Complex used the attack to profit then yes I'd agree with the conspiracy to profit from the results of the attack but not the attack itself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... that's excately it so with them coming out woukd put doubt in your head i personally think 9/11 will be eventually admited as a inside job Why?" will not realise paperwork a skyscraper is designed too take all aspects into account including planes jet fuel does not burn at at high enough heat too melt steel bulk of jet fuel burns on impact hints the explosion building 7 witch was untouched falling in a fashion of a controlled demolition pentagon where the hole of suspose plane attack was not large enough for the plane they said crashed into it plus no video proof relaised too prove a plane hit the building and most surveillance cameras in the pentagon as anywhere in the world fbi where at two locations within minutes too take security footage of the premises why?? I can keep going | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... that's excately it so with them coming out woukd put doubt in your head i personally think 9/11 will be eventually admited as a inside job I disagree. .. far too many variables, now IF you were to say the Military Complex used the attack to profit then yes I'd agree with the conspiracy to profit from the results of the attack but not the attack itself. " alot too gain support too attack Afghanistan too gain oil reverses money is king simple as that and human life does nkt matter when there is billions too be earned | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread kind of misses the point. You ask if we believe them or not. 1 may be true and 100 not true. For example. Guys fawkes conspired to blow up the houses of parliment. Foes that mean that because this conspiracy is accepted as fact that automatically means 9/11 was an inside job and we didnt land on the moon. No it doesnt. Every theory must be considered case by case. " I have stated one that have being proving too he true mk ultra for example amd my own personal option is that 9/11 is a inside job no concrete prove yet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread kind of misses the point. You ask if we believe them or not. 1 may be true and 100 not true. For example. Guys fawkes conspired to blow up the houses of parliment. Foes that mean that because this conspiracy is accepted as fact that automatically means 9/11 was an inside job and we didnt land on the moon. No it doesnt. Every theory must be considered case by case. " Ah! Clearly, people and governments have conspired against each other, throughout history. And skepticism lies at the very heart of science. Yet there is something fundamentally dangerous and unscientific about the nature of conspiracy theorising... 1/ It's never just about *one* conspiracy. 2/ The premise of (most) conspiracy theories is inherently unscientific It is not wrong to have a hypothesis. What is suspicious is when that hypothesis never changes. In contrast to scientific theories, conspiracy theories are also not revised in light of new evidence. If there was evidence that something happened not because of some evil plan, but rather, simply because of an accident, a conspiracy theory is still unlikely to be updated. Instead, the evidence is rejected, usually on the basis that it must be part of the conspiracy. In short, conspiracy theories have a tendency to form a closed network of false beliefs that mutually support each other. It's the psychology of disbelief, not rocket science... that shit gets you to the moon and back. ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... One of my fave's is Hollow Earth Theory. This nonsense gained increasing traction for 200 years. Even the Nazis sent an expedition ![]() Oh I've heard almost all of them mate, hollow earth, Nazis in Antarctica, Dulche alien base, rendelsham forest... underwater ufos ... nibaru, the anastasi ... I was a complete sponge for about 3 years... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread kind of misses the point. You ask if we believe them or not. 1 may be true and 100 not true. For example. Guys fawkes conspired to blow up the houses of parliment. Foes that mean that because this conspiracy is accepted as fact that automatically means 9/11 was an inside job and we didnt land on the moon. No it doesnt. Every theory must be considered case by case. Ah! Clearly, people and governments have conspired against each other, throughout history. And skepticism lies at the very heart of science. Yet there is something fundamentally dangerous and unscientific about the nature of conspiracy theorising... 1/ It's never just about *one* conspiracy. 2/ The premise of (most) conspiracy theories is inherently unscientific It is not wrong to have a hypothesis. What is suspicious is when that hypothesis never changes. In contrast to scientific theories, conspiracy theories are also not revised in light of new evidence. If there was evidence that something happened not because of some evil plan, but rather, simply because of an accident, a conspiracy theory is still unlikely to be updated. Instead, the evidence is rejected, usually on the basis that it must be part of the conspiracy. In short, conspiracy theories have a tendency to form a closed network of false beliefs that mutually support each other. It's the psychology of disbelief, not rocket science... that shit gets you to the moon and back. ![]() false belief tell that too the victems of mk ultra and the African American syphilis project amount thousands that died in Vietnam | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread kind of misses the point. You ask if we believe them or not. 1 may be true and 100 not true. For example. Guys fawkes conspired to blow up the houses of parliment. Foes that mean that because this conspiracy is accepted as fact that automatically means 9/11 was an inside job and we didnt land on the moon. No it doesnt. Every theory must be considered case by case. Ah! Clearly, people and governments have conspired against each other, throughout history. And skepticism lies at the very heart of science. Yet there is something fundamentally dangerous and unscientific about the nature of conspiracy theorising... 1/ It's never just about *one* conspiracy. 2/ The premise of (most) conspiracy theories is inherently unscientific It is not wrong to have a hypothesis. What is suspicious is when that hypothesis never changes. In contrast to scientific theories, conspiracy theories are also not revised in light of new evidence. If there was evidence that something happened not because of some evil plan, but rather, simply because of an accident, a conspiracy theory is still unlikely to be updated. Instead, the evidence is rejected, usually on the basis that it must be part of the conspiracy. In short, conspiracy theories have a tendency to form a closed network of false beliefs that mutually support each other. It's the psychology of disbelief, not rocket science... that shit gets you to the moon and back. ![]() You have, in one sentence, validated my long-winded and worthy argument. *doffs bowler* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... One of my fave's is Hollow Earth Theory. This nonsense gained increasing traction for 200 years. Even the Nazis sent an expedition ![]() I grew up in Glastonbury ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() ![]() Is this your way of luring young men into your attic?? ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread kind of misses the point. You ask if we believe them or not. 1 may be true and 100 not true. For example. Guys fawkes conspired to blow up the houses of parliment. Foes that mean that because this conspiracy is accepted as fact that automatically means 9/11 was an inside job and we didnt land on the moon. No it doesnt. Every theory must be considered case by case. Ah! Clearly, people and governments have conspired against each other, throughout history. And skepticism lies at the very heart of science. Yet there is something fundamentally dangerous and unscientific about the nature of conspiracy theorising... 1/ It's never just about *one* conspiracy. 2/ The premise of (most) conspiracy theories is inherently unscientific It is not wrong to have a hypothesis. What is suspicious is when that hypothesis never changes. In contrast to scientific theories, conspiracy theories are also not revised in light of new evidence. If there was evidence that something happened not because of some evil plan, but rather, simply because of an accident, a conspiracy theory is still unlikely to be updated. Instead, the evidence is rejected, usually on the basis that it must be part of the conspiracy. In short, conspiracy theories have a tendency to form a closed network of false beliefs that mutually support each other. It's the psychology of disbelief, not rocket science... that shit gets you to the moon and back. ![]() I think you might just have proved DJ's point...... ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... One of my fave's is Hollow Earth Theory. This nonsense gained increasing traction for 200 years. Even the Nazis sent an expedition ![]() The moon is a hologram? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3axPn65MGM | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are heaps of weird events, coincidences etc relating to 9-11. However, the conspiracy theorists then come up with a theories that contain a massive amount more weird events, coincidences, implausibilities etc. If 9-11 was an inside job, it would have required a cast of 1000s in on the secret to pull it off and a US government that was willing to make itself look incompetent and unable to defend the realm. There are way more holes in any conspiracy theory postulating the above than the "official" narrative. " did they care before when they infected African american males with syphilis??? Or during the 23 years of project mk ultra?? Or several other government cover ups! I think not I uderstand your point but they have done it before more than once so can do ot again quite easy! I understand yiur point valid points for both sides of the 9/11 arguement | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Worry about things when they happen ![]() things are happening around us unknown too public knowledge we should know | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Here's a good'un... Saddam's stargate was the real reason for the invasion of Iraq... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WultFCDYC6U" clearly they are complete waffle similar too thst Obama is bin laden with plastic surgery ha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem is once you go down the route of looking into them it can take over. The only way to fight the system effectively is to gain enough wealth and power to enact a change.. But to get wealth and power generally you have have to sacrifice your principles so by the time you get power all you care about is maintaining it. " well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I stumbled upon an odd one recently called the Mandela effect " I will take a look at that one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Here's a good'un... Saddam's stargate was the real reason for the invasion of Iraq... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WultFCDYC6U clearly they are complete waffle similar too thst Obama is bin laden with plastic surgery ha " ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Worry about things when they happen ![]() What if they're already happening and your just too apathetic to worry or you're not paying attention enough? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Worry about things when they happen ![]() excately it we are just all a bunch of puppets on a string | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Here's a good'un... Saddam's stargate was the real reason for the invasion of Iraq... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WultFCDYC6U clearly they are complete waffle similar too thst Obama is bin laden with plastic surgery ha ![]() yes that is a real thing and that Michelle Obama was born a man ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All conspiracy theories are false ...... That David Icke's the worst of the lot ..... Anyway I'm off to shapeshift into my actual lizard form, to swallow some live mice with the rest of the Royal Family" not all are false my dear man if you read threw past posts are several that have being admitted too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem is once you go down the route of looking into them it can take over. The only way to fight the system effectively is to gain enough wealth and power to enact a change.. But to get wealth and power generally you have have to sacrifice your principles so by the time you get power all you care about is maintaining it. " Exactly. Hence my first post ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem is once you go down the route of looking into them it can take over. The only way to fight the system effectively is to gain enough wealth and power to enact a change.. But to get wealth and power generally you have have to sacrifice your principles so by the time you get power all you care about is maintaining it. Exactly. Hence my first post ![]() no one is mega rich or in power with out fucking peoplee over so principles and moraks aren't a tyrait they have | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are some classics in here ... I will admit for my faults I got suckered into the whole conspiracy thing many many years ago and I SOAKED up this shit like a damp sponge.... then I began to apply logic not to motivation of people and the reasons why they carried out all the conspiracies I was falling for but to the mechanics of the actual so called events and it is surprisingly easy to pick apart almost every single one... there are exceptions such as already been mentioned, the African American syphilis experiments is one, MK Ultra is another as is the Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate was also a conspiracy which came out into the open very quickly which is unusual... One of my fave's is Hollow Earth Theory. This nonsense gained increasing traction for 200 years. Even the Nazis sent an expedition ![]() Yup heard that one too... but in your later post you mention Sodamn Insanes stargate - - that's a new one on me... ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved. I really dont know if it's that clear cut because that is very sloppy if it was done that way I bekieve there was another shooter and Oswald was a scapegoat Saw another video where it shows the gun in the driver's hand. Couldn't believe what I was seeing. Will see if I can find it somewhere. ![]() I looked at Project mK ultra in the past with all the issues around the death of Frank Olson. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face " Or Hillsborough. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh " Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades" will do thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades" But note that the scandal was a well-attested and documented cover up. It's not a conspiracy theory, it's sadly true. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it I watched a programme which pointed to an accidental misfire from a she ret service agent sitting on the back of the following convertible, hushed up to hide how inept the SS were & obviously no one would believe it wasn't an assassination.. My own one is the Philadelphia experiment. I reckon something like it probably has happened. UFO's are also hushed up not because they are aliens but because they are us from the future..IMO travelling in time will come before travelling into deep space.. S" Time travel interesting over a year ago when I was last on here there was a forum post about time travel possible or not great read and I posted my theories as to why if it was to happen we would never detect it or no about it . Wish I could remember the forums post name it was a good debate and very interesting . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades But note that the scandal was a well-attested and documented cover up. It's not a conspiracy theroys, it's sadly true." well isn't a conspiracy a cover up until proven true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades But note that the scandal was a well-attested and documented cover up. It's not a conspiracy theroys, it's sadly true. well isn't a conspiracy a cover up until proven true " Like the Profumo Affair - it's a scandal/cover up - not a conspiracy theory | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades But note that the scandal was a well-attested and documented cover up. It's not a conspiracy theroys, it's sadly true. well isn't a conspiracy a cover up until proven true Like the Profumo Affair - it's a scandal/cover up - not a conspiracy theory" Same for the Guilford four and Birmingham six. No one conspired to convict them. Poor forensics at the time and a subsequent cover up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades But note that the scandal was a well-attested and documented cover up. It's not a conspiracy theroys, it's sadly true. well isn't a conspiracy a cover up until proven true Like the Profumo Affair - it's a scandal/cover up - not a conspiracy theory Same for the Guilford four and Birmingham six. No one conspired to convict them. Poor forensics at the time and a subsequent cover up." watch paddy hills interviews torture and abuse too get a confession picked forst ieish group they seen too can a conviction so the public had someone too blame as the police could not find the real bombers and as for the Guilford four the bomber even admitted too it and was brused under the carpet perhaps not conspired too convict but zero evidence in both case just irish people hand picked too pay for a crime they did nkt do while the real idiots walked free too do more bombing etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it well that had never being admitted by us government the two I mentioned have being admited by Presidents its never been admitted and never will be in our life timd but the shot he took has been tested from a 5 storey high scaffold with the exact same type of rifle aiming at a stationary target at the same distance they had to get 3 shots in 6 seconds not one of the pro army snipers that were invited to try succeeded Actually it has been reproduced, exactly, many times; it's a very easy shot, even given that there were some minor faults in the weapon. Bearing in mind that the head shot was, in effect a " miss" ; he would have been going for a second body shot, not a head shot; that was a "lucky accident" for him, 3 shots in less than 6 seconds at distance on a moving target with a bolt action rifle that was old by 1960's standards is not an easy shot. Thats take aim fire deal with the recoil reload and take aim again and fire. Each shot hitting the target with less than 2 seconds inbetween if you have ever tried using a bolt action rifle and i have on a gun range you will understand how hard that is" I have used rifles all my life; ( I own several, modern and historic) and even with that bolt action rifle ( which is not a very slick action ) 3 shots in 6 seconds is easy . It's basically an older style Mauser action. With a modern Mauser bolt action I can easily put 3 rounds from a Mauser action rifle into a foot square in 2 seconds . With my 1901 Mauser I can do it in about 3 seconds. Someone with Oswsld's military training should be able to do it fairly easily in 6 seconds with the minimum of practice. Especially as he would have been aiming at the body, not the head. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And another example is the Guilford four and Birmingham six innocent victims sentenced too jail falsely accused of bombings for no reason or proof and British government covered it up another example of government covering up things too save face Or Hillsborough.i actually domt know alot on Hillsborough tbh Have a read of some serious journalism... https://www.theguardian.com/football/2016/apr/26/hillsborough-disaster-deadly-mistakes-and-lies-that-lasted-decades But note that the scandal was a well-attested and documented cover up. It's not a conspiracy theroys, it's sadly true. well isn't a conspiracy a cover up until proven true Like the Profumo Affair - it's a scandal/cover up - not a conspiracy theory Same for the Guilford four and Birmingham six. No one conspired to convict them. Poor forensics at the time and a subsequent cover up. watch paddy hills interviews torture and abuse too get a confession picked forst ieish group they seen too can a conviction so the public had someone too blame as the police could not find the real bombers and as for the Guilford four the bomber even admitted too it and was brused under the carpet perhaps not conspired too convict but zero evidence in both case just irish people hand picked too pay for a crime they did nkt do while the real idiots walked free too do more bombing etc " Even if that's true, in itself it's not a conspiracy. The cover up after the event maybe. As I said; "if" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. " utter crap,,the moon does,nt even exist ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. utter crap,,the moon does,nt even exist ![]() I know right, I mean who is daft enough to believe that a large lump of cheese or even dafter some say it's rock would just float about in the air like that... no turtles or elephants or anything logical holding it up... ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's the classic jfk. Back and to the left.lol the shot the lee harvey oswald apparently took has been tested by pro army snipers with the same type of rifle and none of them managed to get all the shots on target in the time he was supposed to have done it well that had never being admitted by us government the two I mentioned have being admited by Presidents " Show us where......? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. utter crap,,the moon does,nt even exist ![]() ![]() The turtle is on the other side....it is A'Tuins twin. That's why we can always only see one side of the moon. Also why if something goes upside down we say it has "turned turtle " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers I believe that Boris Johnson is a fiction,it is,in fact,a panda in a Boris suit! ![]() Nooo most definitely a panda! ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers " Men didn't land on the moon! Outrageous crap. Do these idiots not realise how technology has advanced so much, it would now be impossible to maintain the lie. The Russians would just love to expose it as a lie ! I think another of the silliest theories I have heard is that it wasn't Titanic that hit the iceberg. It was one of the sister ships. A guy has spent many years trying to prove it. One has to ask why ???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers Men didn't land on the moon! Outrageous crap. Do these idiots not realise how technology has advanced so much, it would now be impossible to maintain the lie. The Russians would just love to expose it as a lie ! I think another of the silliest theories I have heard is that it wasn't Titanic that hit the iceberg. It was one of the sister ships. A guy has spent many years trying to prove it. One has to ask why ????" the real question is not whether we went to the moon we obviously did . the real unanswered one is why did we stop going and why has no other country visited since . that's the mystery in my opinion when it comes to the moon . PS has anyone ever heard of the black knight satellite interesting theories around it. no one knows if it exists but there has been some very odd radar tracking's of what some believe to be the black knight. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"https://youtu.be/P74Q2NUBmGk The driver turns around and shoots him at 3:45. There' a slow motion at 4:30. The president gets shot from the front and his head rocks backwards. Case - solved." Go check out JFK Mandela effect that is not the case any more | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() DONT DO IT. As you put your eye to his telescope, he will assassinate you, for speaking out. He's a CIA operative !! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. The idea that the moon landing were faked is preposterous. 1/ the sheer number of people involved in NASA and *no-one* has said anything in 50 years? 2/ if the US *didn't* go to the moon the Russkies would have blown it wide open. 3/ with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing sites and the equipment left there by astronauts. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() You've rumbled him his profile will self destruct in three seconds bring the whole site down with it ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers Men didn't land on the moon! Outrageous crap. Do these idiots not realise how technology has advanced so much, it would now be impossible to maintain the lie. The Russians would just love to expose it as a lie ! I think another of the silliest theories I have heard is that it wasn't Titanic that hit the iceberg. It was one of the sister ships. A guy has spent many years trying to prove it. One has to ask why ???? the real question is not whether we went to the moon we obviously did . the real unanswered one is why did we stop going and why has no other country visited since . that's the mystery in my opinion when it comes to the moon . PS has anyone ever heard of the black knight satellite interesting theories around it. no one knows if it exists but there has been some very odd radar tracking's of what some believe to be the black knight. " Easy answer. The U.S. spent billions of dollars putting several men on the moon. It's a rock !!! There is only so much you can learn from it. Why would other nations try to do it ? What are they going to learn that hasn't been learnt already! Why haven't all nations explored the South Pole ? Same reason. No point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers Men didn't land on the moon! Outrageous crap. Do these idiots not realise how technology has advanced so much, it would now be impossible to maintain the lie. The Russians would just love to expose it as a lie ! I think another of the silliest theories I have heard is that it wasn't Titanic that hit the iceberg. It was one of the sister ships. A guy has spent many years trying to prove it. One has to ask why ???? the real question is not whether we went to the moon we obviously did . the real unanswered one is why did we stop going and why has no other country visited since . that's the mystery in my opinion when it comes to the moon . PS has anyone ever heard of the black knight satellite interesting theories around it. no one knows if it exists but there has been some very odd radar tracking's of what some believe to be the black knight. Easy answer. The U.S. spent billions of dollars putting several men on the moon. It's a rock !!! There is only so much you can learn from it. Why would other nations try to do it ? What are they going to learn that hasn't been learnt already! Why haven't all nations explored the South Pole ? Same reason. No point." good points I don't believe in conspiracy theories myself I have a open mind about such things . as for the south pole we are still exploring it we have international bases there as far as I know . so that answer to debunk a question holds no water really . and the moon is not just a rock it has frozen water mineral deposits the lot. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is peoples positions on them? Believers or non believers Men didn't land on the moon! Outrageous crap. Do these idiots not realise how technology has advanced so much, it would now be impossible to maintain the lie. The Russians would just love to expose it as a lie ! I think another of the silliest theories I have heard is that it wasn't Titanic that hit the iceberg. It was one of the sister ships. A guy has spent many years trying to prove it. One has to ask why ???? the real question is not whether we went to the moon we obviously did . the real unanswered one is why did we stop going and why has no other country visited since . that's the mystery in my opinion when it comes to the moon . PS has anyone ever heard of the black knight satellite interesting theories around it. no one knows if it exists but there has been some very odd radar tracking's of what some believe to be the black knight. Easy answer. The U.S. spent billions of dollars putting several men on the moon. It's a rock !!! There is only so much you can learn from it. Why would other nations try to do it ? What are they going to learn that hasn't been learnt already! Why haven't all nations explored the South Pole ? Same reason. No point." 1. Because money was getting tight 2. Remote control vehicles, remote sensing from satellites give us most of the data we need.its easier and more effective to send robotic devices to the moon ; sending humans means tons of life support , so wasted payload, which could be better used for scientific instruments. 3. The space station became a more scientifically useful project; 4. Deep space exploration is more useful at the moment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have people on my Facebook, conspiracy nuts who keeping posting pictures of the sky as evidence of Chemtrails. This has to be both the most annoying and ridiculous conspiracy theory going. I seriously wonder were they dropped a lot as children. " But what if the chemtrails make babies slippery, as part of the cladestine rulers of the universes plan to fill the world with conspiracy nuts ![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The moon landings. I find that fascinating. utter crap,,the moon does,nt even exist ![]() ![]() OK, you have convinced me. In that case obviously the moon landings are real, there are only really 2 choices. 1 its real, a slightly power mad president decides to spend whatever it costs to risk his peoples lives in a crazy bid to wander about a bit on the moon. 2 thousands of Americans keep a secret. option 1 is the only credible option ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have people on my Facebook, conspiracy nuts who keeping posting pictures of the sky as evidence of Chemtrails. This has to be both the most annoying and ridiculous conspiracy theory going. I seriously wonder were they dropped a lot as children. But what if the chemtrails make babies slippery, as part of the cladestine rulers of the universes plan to fill the world with conspiracy nuts ![]() ![]() You might be on to something there ![]() | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(although, admittedly, I may have slightly miss-timed this joke)... ![]() I suspect any misstiming wouldn't matter to a man with your "talents". *taps nose. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(although, admittedly, I may have slightly miss-timed this joke)... ![]() [reply removed by the smoking man from the X-Files 19:59 9/9/16] | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |