![](https://fabs-as.fabswingers.com/images/default.jpg) |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Same as socks though
Sock = one
Socks = Plural, more than one, two minimum
Pair of socks = We'll it should be four going by the above
S
"
A pair of socks is right
You have 2 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
![](https://fabs-as.fabswingers.com/images/default.jpg) |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Take the question to Brussels and be quick before article 50 is invoked, it's selling by a false description, we could all be due compensation. It would give the PPI claims people something new to do.
" Have you been sold a pair of pants in the last 10 years, were you informed it was only actually a pant, we can get your money back for you, would you like to make a claim" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
![](https://fabs-as.fabswingers.com/images/default.jpg) |
By *mmmMaybeCouple
over a year ago
West Wales |
"Same as socks though
Sock = one
Socks = Plural, more than one, two minimum
Pair of socks = We'll it should be four going by the above
S
A pair of socks is right
You have 2 "
But "socks" is already two (or more) if you shout "Get some socks out my drawer please' you will get two. Ergo a pair of socks is four
Amazing what two lone blokes in a transport office can discuss over two years
S |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
![](https://fabs-as.fabswingers.com/images/default.jpg) |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Take the question to Brussels and be quick before article 50 is invoked, it's selling by a false description, we could all be due compensation. It would give the PPI claims people something new to do.
" Have you been sold a pair of pants in the last 10 years, were you informed it was only actually a pant, we can get your money back for you, would you like to make a claim""
Could ppi be
Pants pairing incorrectness |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
![](https://fabs-as.fabswingers.com/images/default.jpg) |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Take the question to Brussels and be quick before article 50 is invoked, it's selling by a false description, we could all be due compensation. It would give the PPI claims people something new to do.
" Have you been sold a pair of pants in the last 10 years, were you informed it was only actually a pant, we can get your money back for you, would you like to make a claim"
Could ppi be
Pants pairing incorrectness "
I will ask them that next time they ring XXX |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic