|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
In January 2009 there were 41 posts on this forum. In January 2010 there were 1231 posts. In January 2011 there were 1349 posts. I wonder how these figures compare with the unemployment ones!! Or with a new series on telly or the drop in the birth rate...... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"There were probably more words typed in those 41 threads than all of the 1349 threads this January."
Your mission. Should you decide to accept it. Is to go and count and report back. This tape will self destruct in 5... 4 ...... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"can the OP advise what the top 5 subjects debated back in 2009 were?
.... wonders if timewasters were on the agenda back then lol"
One a the very first threads i posted on under the swingmates profile was a timewasters thread lol
Some things never change xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
"In January 2009 there were 41 posts on this forum. In January 2010 there were 1231 posts. In January 2011 there were 1349 posts. I wonder how these figures compare with the unemployment ones!! Or with a new series on telly or the drop in the birth rate...... "
It could have something to do with it coincided with the forums being opened in 2009 ( I think, but times flies so I could be wrong ) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
There was a period of time when the new owners took over the site that the forums were down for months. Perhaps that coincides with the low number of posts in Jan 2009. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic