FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Farage vs cameron
Farage vs cameron
Jump to: Newest in thread
Watching this now and fell like throwing the tv out the window, some really unfair comments to Farage specially about being racist to black peopleather cos he has such high views on net migration! Really? I work with with black/ Asian all sorts of regions at the hospital and they have expressed there concerns how is it racist? Confused is the word right now |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
nigel got absolutely roasted..... i think he had nick griffin flashbacks....
his answers with regards to big pharma... and the answer with regard to his cologne comments really made me wince....
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ezebelWoman
over a year ago
North of The Wall - youll need your vest |
I didnt listen to the content of his replies - the tone of his comments and the way he speaks just reminds me of some of the whinging / arrogant posts you sometimes see on here. I think he must have a profile or two. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He sure did! Was horrid to watch! His answers were all over the place but he didn't get a chance to talk either, I don't know why I watch these things haha"
Probably best not to watch these things at all xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"He sure did! Was horrid to watch! His answers were all over the place but he didn't get a chance to talk either, I don't know why I watch these things haha"
it was a car crash for the outers. no wonder they have kept him under wraps |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ezebelWoman
over a year ago
North of The Wall - youll need your vest |
"He sure did! Was horrid to watch! His answers were all over the place but he didn't get a chance to talk either, I don't know why I watch these things haha
it was a car crash for the outers. no wonder they have kept him under wraps "
I wish Id actually listened to it now  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'd argue that Farage tried to quote facts in his answers.
Cameron is just waffling and scaremongering. He should overrule any calls for another Scottish referendum
Am still undecided for the record |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
until cameron decides to a tv debate with either johnson or gove then i think he's a spineless wanker who's not worth backing...you'll not get a real prospective until the big guns from either side debate then you can get a more measured opinion of whether to stay or leave... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Nigels winning no probs
That is a fucking terrifying thought. "
Precisely why is it such a terrible thought to want to stop massive and uncontrolled immigration, have our Parliament as Sovereign and to have the Supreme Court of our land here in the UK and not in Strasbourg?
Forget the personalities and think of our future outside the political monstrosity that will soon be the United States of Europe... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"nigel got absolutely roasted..... i think he had nick griffin flashbacks....
his answers with regards to big pharma... and the answer with regard to his cologne comments really made me wince....
"
..no bias in your opinions there then ...  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
He is not an mp which is a bonus.
we would not have a vote if it where not for ukip however I would not vote for him.
for the record I'm a leave.
have worked in the EU zone its not good and we are not popular. The Eu will continue ever closer union untill we are left with a senator. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Putting the obvious biased opinions of Remainers or Brexiters aside on here, many of the post debate analysis by political commenrators on itv news at 10, sky news and BBC news put the itv Cameron/Farage debate as a score draw.
Sure Farage had some difficult moments but so did David Cameron. I would say both of them put in a mediocre performance tonight with neither coming out as the clear winner. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eccymanMan
over a year ago
Gateshead |
"Putting the obvious biased opinions of Remainers or Brexiters aside on here, many of the post debate analysis by political commenrators on itv news at 10, sky news and BBC news put the itv Cameron/Farage debate as a score draw.
Sure Farage had some difficult moments but so did David Cameron. I would say both of them put in a mediocre performance tonight with neither coming out as the clear winner. "
Hence why Corbyn has been so quiet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Farage has the problem that people listen to the media and others bod either decide all his comments are because he's a racist, rather than listen to what he actually says. One opinionated woman was essentially telling him what he ment and blindly refused to listen to or allow him to answer. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *HaRiFMan
over a year ago
Beyond the shadows. |
"Nigels winning no probs
That is a fucking terrifying thought.
Precisely why is it such a terrible thought to want to stop massive and uncontrolled immigration, have our Parliament as Sovereign and to have the Supreme Court of our land here in the UK and not in Strasbourg?
Forget the personalities and think of our future outside the political monstrosity that will soon be the United States of Europe..."
Think people are getting confused, this referendum is about staying or leaving the European political union. Not the European single market, its going to have sod all effect on controlling immigration. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I thought Corben was anti EU looking at his voting stats.
Why would he suddenly about turn ?
 "
George Galloway who literally sat next to Jeremy Corbyn on the back benches of the house of commons for many years says Corbyn looks like a hostage in this EU referendum. He is being held captive by the Labour party and being forced to mouth the words they tell him but in his heart Corbyn doesn't really believe it. Corbyn has gone out of his way to keep as low profile as possible in this EU referendum campaign. He voted to come out of what is now the EU in 1975, and stood alongside Labour figures like Tony Benn and Michael Foot who said we should leave the EU. Jeremy Corbyn has been a staunch Eurosceptic for decades right up until funnily enough he became leader of the labour party. George Galloway said Corbyn stood alongside him in the lobbies to get Britain out of the EU. Corbyn is not fooling anyone. He is only doing what he is now doing to try to gain what little support he can from the parliamentary Labour party and the Blairites who want to stay in the EU. Watch closely because before June 23rd Corbyn could still change sides again he may not think the little support from the Blairites is worth betraying his Eurosceptic principles for. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Nigels winning no probs
That is a fucking terrifying thought.
Precisely why is it such a terrible thought to want to stop massive and uncontrolled immigration, have our Parliament as Sovereign and to have the Supreme Court of our land here in the UK and not in Strasbourg?
Forget the personalities and think of our future outside the political monstrosity that will soon be the United States of Europe...
Think people are getting confused, this referendum is about staying or leaving the European political union. Not the European single market, its going to have sod all effect on controlling immigration."
David Cameron thinks this is a referendum on the single market. He seems reluctant to talk about anything else. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Unfortunately, it's quite easy to get drawn into the battle of personalities and forget what the debate is really about. I expect that many will end up voting based on who they dislike the least, as a result. It's best to avoid these debates and try to find an unbiased opinion to shed light on what is a complex situation, but one that has disgracefully been subject to scaremongering from both sides.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Nigels winning no probs
That is a fucking terrifying thought.
Precisely why is it such a terrible thought to want to stop massive and uncontrolled immigration, have our Parliament as Sovereign and to have the Supreme Court of our land here in the UK and not in Strasbourg?
Forget the personalities and think of our future outside the political monstrosity that will soon be the United States of Europe...
Think people are getting confused, this referendum is about staying or leaving the European political union. Not the European single market, its going to have sod all effect on controlling immigration.
David Cameron thinks this is a referendum on the single market. He seems reluctant to talk about anything else. "
And Nigel said he did not give a stuff about the future of 10% of the uk manufacturing base which is the pharmaceutical industry. The one industrial sector where the UK is a world beater. Absolutely bonkers  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Unfortunately, it's quite easy to get drawn into the battle of personalities and forget what the debate is really about. I expect that many will end up voting based on who they dislike the least, as a result. It's best to avoid these debates and try to find an unbiased opinion to shed light on what is a complex situation, but one that has disgracefully been subject to scaremongering from both sides. "
I agree whole-heartedly. But the whole process is a waste of time and money, imo, and distracts from serious g'ment business while this ridiculous circus goes round and round.
I'm sick of it already.
Even after we've voted and we stay in they'll still be banging on about it for fucking weeks.
Jeeezus H Christ in a chicken basket!
Shoot me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
"
which ever way it goes, the outcome will be like an Edvard Munch painting circa 1893  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
which ever way it goes, the outcome will be like an Edvard Munch painting circa 1893 "
Always look on the brightside of life  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
which ever way it goes, the outcome will be like an Edvard Munch painting circa 1893 "
The whole country's gone mad. Over an accidental election pledge that the Conservatives never expected to have to enact. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick. "
This.
I could not disagree more with the things Farage says, but however disgraceful I think he is (and, by God, I think he's diagraceful), at least he seems to believe what he's saying. Cameron is a snake oil salesman. I don't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth, even if I agree with him. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick. "
You missed the last 10 minutes then where Cameron basically said if you want to leave the EU you are a quitter, a little Englander and you don't love Britain. Judging by the polls Cameron just insulted half of the population of the country and half of his own party who want to Leave the EU. Yeah great way to win votes Dave, just insult them! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *artytwoCouple
over a year ago
Wolverhampton |
How fucking stupid is it to let un-elected foreign bureaucrats have remote control of our finances, justice, borders, employment etc etc. Forget all this ridiculous personality/sound-bite blarney, lets leave this european farce to it's eventual demise. Vote out. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick.
You missed the last 10 minutes then where Cameron basically said if you want to leave the EU you are a quitter, a little Englander and you don't love Britain. Judging by the polls Cameron just insulted half of the population of the country and half of his own party who want to Leave the EU. Yeah great way to win votes Dave, just insult them! "
Lol - as I said - I had to leave the house and go for a walk |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" Think people are getting confused, this referendum is about staying or leaving the European political union. Not the European single market, its going to have sod all effect on controlling immigration. "
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day...."
The woman in the audience tonight who you mentioned had clearly not checked her facts beforehand. It's common knowledge really that Farage wants closer ties with the commonwealth and not the EU. There are many videos on youtube dating back years where he is on record saying that. It's EU immigration policy that discriminates against anyone from outside of the EU giving unfair favour to anyone with an EU passport. An Australian points based immigration system if we left the EU would be more fair and treat all immigrants equally no matter where in the world they come from. It's also very easy to find out that Ukip have had a good number of black, mixed race and ethnic minorities candidates up for election in various elections (which the woman in the audience claimed they hadn't).
When Farage pointed out to her that many black and ethnic minority people had voted Ukip in the general election she said "what percentage of the overall 3% of the vote you got then?" Ukip actually got around 14% of the overall vote share in the general election so God knows where she got the 3% share idea from? It seems she was ill prepared or just uninformed of the facts, or just trying to make Farage look bad but people will not be fooled because most of what she said was nonsense. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oyce69Man
over a year ago
Driffield |
"Nigels winning no probs
That is a fucking terrifying thought.
Precisely why is it such a terrible thought to want to stop massive and uncontrolled immigration, have our Parliament as Sovereign and to have the Supreme Court of our land here in the UK and not in Strasbourg?
Forget the personalities and think of our future outside the political monstrosity that will soon be the United States of Europe..."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick.
This.
I could not disagree more with the things Farage says, but however disgraceful I think he is (and, by God, I think he's diagraceful), at least he seems to believe what he's saying. Cameron is a snake oil salesman. I don't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth, even if I agree with him."
This! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" Think people are getting confused, this referendum is about staying or leaving the European political union. Not the European single market, its going to have sod all effect on controlling immigration.
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here."
Nope...still not getting old, the amusement at the total lack of irony when people hold up Australia as a shining example of how to control borders. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Putting the obvious biased opinions of Remainers or Brexiters aside on here, many of the post debate analysis by political commenrators on itv news at 10, sky news and BBC news put the itv Cameron/Farage debate as a score draw.
Sure Farage had some difficult moments but so did David Cameron. I would say both of them put in a mediocre performance tonight with neither coming out as the clear winner. "
I did not watch last night then when I started to read the posts here I thought things had gone to shit (posts 2 - 10) then I realised they were biased opinions
I appreciate this opinion above which is level headed and non biased like many posts on here
good post |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" Think people are getting confused, this referendum is about staying or leaving the European political union. Not the European single market, its going to have sod all effect on controlling immigration.
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here.
Nope...still not getting old, the amusement at the total lack of irony when people hold up Australia as a shining example of how to control borders."
Then tell us how we should do it Miss Stress (control our borders) will be interested on your knowledge |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *arry247Couple
over a year ago
Wakefield |
Julie Etchingham needs to learn how to conduct a debate.
If you compare the two "debates" Nigel Farage was cut short or not allowed to answer questions posed whereas David Cameron was allowed to waffle on unimpeded.
The bias stood out a mile.
Having watched the whole sorry affair twice I have come to the opinion that inspite of this Nigel Farage scored far better in the replies he was allowed to make than David Cameron |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How fucking stupid is it to let un-elected foreign bureaucrats have remote control of our finances, justice, borders, employment etc etc. Forget all this ridiculous personality/sound-bite blarney, lets leave this european farce to it's eventual demise. Vote out."
A demise which is inching ever closer by the day. Undemocratic, corrupt, unnacountable. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How fucking stupid is it to let un-elected foreign bureaucrats have remote control of our finances, justice, borders, employment etc etc. Forget all this ridiculous personality/sound-bite blarney, lets leave this european farce to it's eventual demise. Vote out."
1. "They" are not " unelected" they are elected by the council of ministers. Bear in mind that in UK our ministers are not elected. They are appointed by the Prime Minister; and Ministers do not have to be elected MPs ; many aren't.
2.The EU does not have control of our finances: we do
3. The EU does not have control of our justice; we do
4. The EU does not have control of our borders: we do
5. The EU does not have control of our employment: we do. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's all kind of pointless as the whole thing is rigged for us to stay in anyway...I might not even bother going to that polling station!"
If you are voting leave then go to the polling station and cast your vote. Leave is in the lead in a few different polls now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Of course, what everyone has forgotten is that a Referendum has no legal status within the British Constitution;
The principle of British law making is that Parliament is sovereign; only Oarkuament can make decisions; and pass laws;
A referendum us no more than the expression of the wishes of the population.
Even if there is an " out" vote, then for the UK to leave the EU, the government must put a motion before the house, that the UK is to leave the EU; and that has to be passed by parliament .
The wishes expressed in the referendum will be taken into account.
But the UK cannot, constitutionally, leave the EU until it has been passed in parliament.
It was the same for the Scottish Referendum; if independence had won the referendum, there would have been no change until Parliament had agreed it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"nigel got absolutely roasted..... i think he had nick griffin flashbacks....
his answers with regards to big pharma... and the answer with regard to his cologne comments really made me wince....
..no bias in your opinions there then ... "
you liked his answer on his cologne comments then? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Putting the obvious biased opinions of Remainers or Brexiters aside on here, many of the post debate analysis by political commenrators on itv news at 10, sky news and BBC news put the itv Cameron/Farage debate as a score draw.
Sure Farage had some difficult moments but so did David Cameron. I would say both of them put in a mediocre performance tonight with neither coming out as the clear winner.
I did not watch last night then when I started to read the posts here I thought things had gone to shit (posts 2 - 10) then I realised they were biased opinions
I appreciate this opinion above which is level headed and non biased like many posts on here
good post"
Make you mind up. First it's score draw and then later the audience aren't fair by failing to agree with Farage. At least this time Farage didn't directly attack the audience
Both sides had hostile questions and if Nigel comes across as awkward tough luck |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Nigels winning no probs
That is a fucking terrifying thought.
Precisely why is it such a terrible thought to want to stop massive and uncontrolled immigration, have our Parliament as Sovereign and to have the Supreme Court of our land here in the UK and not in Strasbourg?
Forget the personalities and think of our future outside the political monstrosity that will soon be the United States of Europe...
Think people are getting confused, this referendum is about staying or leaving the European political union. Not the European single market, its going to have sod all effect on controlling immigration."
Indeed ...but it will have everything to do with migration if we do leave ad we can then control what Merton so blindly and stupidly did. ...that's the confusing point.
And it will have little if any effect on us and the European market. The countries telling us not to are doing so because they will have to renegotiate deals which will be less beneficial to them compared to ad they stand now. It will cost them more. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It costs them more but not us ?  "
Of course. Look what we pay into it. Nobody apart the poorest countries get more out if the pot....and I'm not just talking financially. People have forgotten to look a Switzerland and a couple others in all of this. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It costs them more but not us ?
Of course. Look what we pay into it. Nobody apart the poorest countries get more out if the pot....and I'm not just talking financially. People have forgotten to look a Switzerland and a couple others in all of this. "
This is confusing as I thought Swiss approach was off the table by the leave side. Have the leave campaign confirmed what approach they have ? It would be good to know at least a day or two before the voting day |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It costs them more but not us ?
Of course. Look what we pay into it. Nobody apart the poorest countries get more out if the pot....and I'm not just talking financially. People have forgotten to look a Switzerland and a couple others in all of this.
This is confusing as I thought Swiss approach was off the table by the leave side. Have the leave campaign confirmed what approach they have ? It would be good to know at least a day or two before the voting day "
lol... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Wasn't a great program, looking forward to watching Andrew Neill taking on George Osborne this evening.
Still undecided, I've always been rather contrary and when so many people tell me to do something I tend to do the opposite. While the benefits of free trade with the EU are obvious, I can't help feeling a vote to stay in will lead to an inexorable move to a United States of Europe. While our system isn't perfect, and far from it, at least we know who are responsible for decisions and we get our chance to fire them or back them every 5 years. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Wasn't a great program, looking forward to watching Andrew Neill taking on George Osborne this evening.
Still undecided, I've always been rather contrary and when so many people tell me to do something I tend to do the opposite. While the benefits of free trade with the EU are obvious, I can't help feeling a vote to stay in will lead to an inexorable move to a United States of Europe. While our system isn't perfect, and far from it, at least we know who are responsible for decisions and we get our chance to fire them or back them every 5 years. "
It always makes me laugh when people say we get free trade with the EU.
We don't because we pay billions every year in EU Membership fees, which is a tariff of sorts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
And final point, Cameron stated that any further transfer of power to the EU would require a referendum. Further transfers look inevitable, do any of us want more and more referenda going forward given how rubbish this one has been?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
That lady who was in the crowd I was originally talking about was just on the radio and boy did she get a thrashing from the presenter and viewers, think she should of kept her mouth shut now. Seems it has done the opposite of what they set out to do, people are going crazy about the way farage was set up with the questions but not cameron. Ooopps |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's much more deeper than a 10 minute Q&A session.
Those MPS who want to stay in are only interested in there pocket. If you where pocketing £3900 per month plus any expensive I'm sure you would want everyone to stay.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick.
You missed the last 10 minutes then where Cameron basically said if you want to leave the EU you are a quitter, a little Englander and you don't love Britain. Judging by the polls Cameron just insulted half of the population of the country and half of his own party who want to Leave the EU. Yeah great way to win votes Dave, just insult them! "
.................I helped at a dinner for old army veteran's last week..all of these old boy's who served their country are voting out....so that slimey cunt Cameron think's these heroe's don't love their country...Fuck the EU..And fuck off Cameron. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's much more deeper than a 10 minute Q&A session.
Those MPS who want to stay in are only interested in there pocket. If you where pocketing £3900 per month plus any expensive I'm sure you would want everyone to stay.
Part of the reason the whole world seems to be telling us to stay in is that they know that the UK leaving is likely to end the whole federal European project.
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's much more deeper than a 10 minute Q&A session.
Those MPS who want to stay in are only interested in there pocket. If you where pocketing £3900 per month plus any expensive I'm sure you would want everyone to stay.
That's their primary driving force. I just listened to Gov and he made alot of sense about taking back control. If we don't now it won't come up again for a very long time.
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick.
You missed the last 10 minutes then where Cameron basically said if you want to leave the EU you are a quitter, a little Englander and you don't love Britain. Judging by the polls Cameron just insulted half of the population of the country and half of his own party who want to Leave the EU. Yeah great way to win votes Dave, just insult them! .................I helped at a dinner for old army veteran's last week..all of these old boy's who served their country are voting out....so that slimey cunt Cameron think's these heroe's don't love their country...Fuck the EU..And fuck off Cameron."
Did you see the veterans for Brexit story yesterday? In a letter to The Sun newspaper 270 members of veterans for Britain, ex service personnel and those currently serving our country in the armed forces were urged to register to vote before the deadline. It is thought the armed forces vote could swing the vote one way or the other so as the deadline to register to vote has been extended until tomorrow now because of website problems on the registration website spread the word with the armed forces community and make sure they are registered to vote before tomorrow. George D Cowie, a former army sergeant said in the letter, "our forebears fought and made terrible sacrifices in 2 world wars for the freedom of their families and the sovereignty of this great country. It falls upon us once again to fight for our freedom and our sovereignty".
Fears have been raised with veterans for Brexit that many armed forces personnel are not registered so the deadline is now tomorrow make sure they register and vote. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Farage is offensive but I actually left the house after 20 mins of Cameron. I wanted to slap his sumg, stupid, fat face...
Pissing on about how the UK is better off in the EU and how committed the g'ment are and how it'll be like a Hieronymus Bosch painting if we left...
As if some other smug, fat stupid entitled cunt/man had randomly pledged to give the country a referendum in the first place.
I had to leave the house.
Go for a walk.
Prick.
You missed the last 10 minutes then where Cameron basically said if you want to leave the EU you are a quitter, a little Englander and you don't love Britain. Judging by the polls Cameron just insulted half of the population of the country and half of his own party who want to Leave the EU. Yeah great way to win votes Dave, just insult them! .................I helped at a dinner for old army veteran's last week..all of these old boy's who served their country are voting out....so that slimey cunt Cameron think's these heroe's don't love their country...Fuck the EU..And fuck off Cameron.
Did you see the veterans for Brexit story yesterday? In a letter to The Sun newspaper 270 members of veterans for Britain, ex service personnel and those currently serving our country in the armed forces were urged to register to vote before the deadline. It is thought the armed forces vote could swing the vote one way or the other so as the deadline to register to vote has been extended until tomorrow now because of website problems on the registration website spread the word with the armed forces community and make sure they are registered to vote before tomorrow. George D Cowie, a former army sergeant said in the letter, "our forebears fought and made terrible sacrifices in 2 world wars for the freedom of their families and the sovereignty of this great country. It falls upon us once again to fight for our freedom and our sovereignty".
Fears have been raised with veterans for Brexit that many armed forces personnel are not registered so the deadline is now tomorrow make sure they register and vote. "
..................................The British army are voting out and they are intending to turn their back on Cameron at every opportunity after this election. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Does anyone know if miltary voting can be analysed ? Do bases get their own voting stations. It will be fascinating to see a breakdown. Just expect Scotland compared to rest will get most attention but other breakdowns will be good to know. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *artytwoCouple
over a year ago
Wolverhampton |
"How fucking stupid is it to let un-elected foreign bureaucrats have remote control of our finances, justice, borders, employment etc etc. Forget all this ridiculous personality/sound-bite blarney, lets leave this european farce to it's eventual demise. Vote out.
1. "They" are not " unelected" they are elected by the council of ministers. Bear in mind that in UK our ministers are not elected. They are appointed by the Prime Minister; and Ministers do not have to be elected MPs ; many aren't.
2.The EU does not have control of our finances: we do
3. The EU does not have control of our justice; we do
4. The EU does not have control of our borders: we do
5. The EU does not have control of our employment: we do."
So Sorry, it must be true if you say so using bullet points. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign. "
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"How fucking stupid is it to let un-elected foreign bureaucrats have remote control of our finances, justice, borders, employment etc etc. Forget all this ridiculous personality/sound-bite blarney, lets leave this european farce to it's eventual demise. Vote out.
1. "They" are not " unelected" they are elected by the council of ministers. Bear in mind that in UK our ministers are not elected. They are appointed by the Prime Minister; and Ministers do not have to be elected MPs ; many aren't.
2.The EU does not have control of our finances: we do
3. The EU does not have control of our justice; we do
4. The EU does not have control of our borders: we do
5. The EU does not have control of our employment: we do.
So Sorry, it must be true if you say so using bullet points."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How fucking stupid is it to let un-elected foreign bureaucrats have remote control of our finances, justice, borders, employment etc etc. Forget all this ridiculous personality/sound-bite blarney, lets leave this european farce to it's eventual demise. Vote out.
1. "They" are not " unelected" they are elected by the council of ministers. Bear in mind that in UK our ministers are not elected. They are appointed by the Prime Minister; and Ministers do not have to be elected MPs ; many aren't.
2.The EU does not have control of our finances: we do
3. The EU does not have control of our justice; we do
4. The EU does not have control of our borders: we do
5. The EU does not have control of our employment: we do."
The Simpsons Stonecutters Song
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZI_aEalijE |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign.
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote "
Err, easier trade with the rest of the world |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign.
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote
Err, easier trade with the rest of the world "
So no idea really, marvellous planning |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign.
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote
Err, easier trade with the rest of the world
So no idea really, marvellous planning "
Why is that not an idea? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Watching this now and fell like throwing the tv out the window, some really unfair comments to Farage specially about being racist to black peopleather cos he has such high views on net migration! Really? I work with with black/ Asian all sorts of regions at the hospital and they have expressed there concerns how is it racist? Confused is the word right now"
Nigel is a tit.
End of story. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign.
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote
Err, easier trade with the rest of the world
So no idea really, marvellous planning
Why is that not an idea?"
An idea has details not an adjective |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign. "
not sure anyone has said we will be 'prevented' from trading if we leave, its accepted that other countries have had to negotiate trade deals with the EU and both sides accept that we will also..
what that will entail is again a matter of supposition and assumption but what it will cause is a period of uncertainty and instability whilst those negotiations are taking place and commerce does not like instability..
what we have at present may not be what we have trade deal wise and no one can say if it will be beneficial.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign.
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote
Err, easier trade with the rest of the world
So no idea really, marvellous planning
Why is that not an idea?
An idea has details not an adjective "
well what are the EU's plans to increase trade? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign.
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote
Err, easier trade with the rest of the world
So no idea really, marvellous planning
Why is that not an idea?
An idea has details not an adjective
well what are the EU's plans to increase trade?"
Nice try switching topic. We leave on 24th so now the UK needs a plan on how to deal with the EU trade and other major markets. Some details on what the best approach would be good to know. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign.
It's the terms of trade that people care about. What are the leave campaign proposing for this ? Would be good to know this side of the vote
Err, easier trade with the rest of the world
So no idea really, marvellous planning
Why is that not an idea?
An idea has details not an adjective
well what are the EU's plans to increase trade?
Nice try switching topic. We leave on 24th so now the UK needs a plan on how to deal with the EU trade and other major markets. Some details on what the best approach would be good to know."
Actually (if it's a leave vote in the Referendum, ) we don't leave on the 24th;
The government goes to Parliament for a vote on whether we leave ( the referendum has no actual power to do anything; it's simply a declaration of the people's wishes ) once Parliament has voted " yes", ( it will probably require an act to be drafted to do it ) we then apply to the EU to leave; it is a two year process . We would leave sometime in 2018. On the way to leaving, Parliament has to agree all the individual terms and conditions negotiated with the EU, the terms for stopping the conditions that are part of the EU, and any new agreements we wish to make .
We don't just " walk away". It is going to be an incredibly complex process .
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Or a rush to invest in the UK"
dream on only a fool and his money are easily parted ..no major company or country has said it will invest substantially in the UK as a result of a brexit vote ..only companies saying they may scale back operations in the UK ... If we leave the EU ..but then you already know brexit will cost jobs ..that's the price to pay for your perceived freedom ...
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day...."
just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Or a rush to invest in the UKdream on only a fool and his money are easily parted ..no major company or country has said it will invest substantially in the UK as a result of a brexit vote ..only companies saying they may scale back operations in the UK ... If we leave the EU ..but then you already know brexit will cost jobs ..that's the price to pay for your perceived freedom ..."
Only a fool and his money are easily parted.
mmmm... take it that's why you don't have a Residencia |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them "
I'm not a supporter as such but can't find any |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And If we leave why should we suddenly be prevented from trading with the rest of EU? Or anything else that they are trying to insinuate on the the current Bremain propaganda campaign. "
Correct. It won't change any of that one little bit...the main difference which people seem to put so little emphasis on is that we the people can start to take back what out politicians have been giving away for their own benefits. Unfortunately recent British tradition has been of the white woolly bleeting rather than the protection of our heritage. Dare I say it the french have more spunk that most of us now... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them
not a supporter as such but can't find any"
I'm am surprised there are well over 50 in the past two years posted by the British press ..but you have minimise fab to search for them only the the blind cant see try brail ..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them
not a supporter as such but can't find any I'm am surprised there are well over 50 in the past two years posted by the British press ..but you have minimise fab to search for them only the the blind cant see try brail ....."
Give us one quote |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them
not a supporter as such but can't find any I'm am surprised there are well over 50 in the past two years posted by the British press ..but you have minimise fab to search for them only the the blind cant see try brail .....
Give us one quote"
its already up here Nigel farage insisting Romanians are more likely to commit crime than any other immigrant..is a racist comment against the Romanians.. Sexist his comment about women in the city should earn less than men .. .. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them
not a supporter as such but can't find any I'm am surprised there are well over 50 in the past two years posted by the British press ..but you have minimise fab to search for them only the the blind cant see try brail .....
Give us one quoteits already up here Nigel farage insisting Romanians are more likely to commit crime than any other immigrant..is a racist comment against the Romanians.. Sexist his comment about women in the city should earn less than men .. .."
.
Statistically he's correct, is it morally right to point it out, maybe, maybe not |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them
not a supporter as such but can't find any I'm am surprised there are well over 50 in the past two years posted by the British press ..but you have minimise fab to search for them only the the blind cant see try brail .....
Give us one quoteits already up here Nigel farage insisting Romanians are more likely to commit crime than any other immigrant..is a racist comment against the Romanians.. Sexist his comment about women in the city should earn less than men .. ...
Statistically he's correct, is it morally right to point it out, maybe, maybe not"
about which women or the Romanians..and what statistics are you referring ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
That's all fine saying it's racist cos he pointed out Romanian men commit these sex crimes etc.. but did not one watch the German programme interview German women about the immigration a few weeks ago? The German attacks new yrs eve and one German lady was sunbathing by a pool and got followed to the changing room after being heckled by a group of Romanian men for wearing a bikini.. they then beat her for this. The German women they interviewed all said they were intimidated by them, they harass there women constantly. Is this racism or fact? What farage was saying to was that we should have better checks and controls on who comes in, not letting just anyone in etc.. I don't see this as racist or biast, I see this as realistic |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them
not a supporter as such but can't find any I'm am surprised there are well over 50 in the past two years posted by the British press ..but you have minimise fab to search for them only the the blind cant see try brail .....
Give us one quoteits already up here Nigel farage insisting Romanians are more likely to commit crime than any other immigrant..is a racist comment against the Romanians.. Sexist his comment about women in the city should earn less than men .. ...
Statistically he's correct, is it morally right to point it out, maybe, maybe not"
You beat me to it. When Farage made those comments about Romanian criminals he backed it up with official MET police crime statistics. Again like the woman in the audience on itv last night people on here making racist accusations and just looking at hysterical newspaper headlines, without looking deeper into it and what was actually said at the time. It now turns out after some investigations in the media that woman who berated Farage in the audience on itv last night is a Huffington Post blogger (not sure why anyone should be surprised by that though?). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It is quite odd how people still call Farage a 'racist'. When he was the only guy saying an open door immigration policy was stupid Labour and the Luvvies threw down the 'Racism' card at him to stop all discussion. And happily lied to us about how many would come here. They said 30,000. Farage said millions and who was right?
I defy anyone to quote ANY racist comments made by Farage during this debate or indeed at any time. To say we must protect our country is NOT racist. To say we have too many immigrants here is NOT racist. The woman who gobbed off big time about Farage pillorying black people was actually a bloody liar. Sadly no one challenged her and Farage was shut down as he tried to correct her.
And setting aside personalities lets remember it is only because of Farage and UKIP and 25 years of their campaigning that we are actually HAVING this Referendum. Well done that man I say.
Vote OUT on the 23rd and lets have our own Independence Day....just search the internet here's one ....Nigel Farage yesterday stoked the row over his ‘racist’ attack on Romanians by insisting that they were more likely to commit crime than other immigrants. He has made over fifty racist comments in the past two years are you to blind to see farage and ukip are a sexist racist homophobic party just type those words preceded by ukip and you will find all of them
not a supporter as such but can't find any I'm am surprised there are well over 50 in the past two years posted by the British press ..but you have minimise fab to search for them only the the blind cant see try brail .....
Give us one quoteits already up here Nigel farage insisting Romanians are more likely to commit crime than any other immigrant..is a racist comment against the Romanians.. Sexist his comment about women in the city should earn less than men .. ...
Statistically he's correct, is it morally right to point it out, maybe, maybe not
You beat me to it. When Farage made those comments about Romanian criminals he backed it up with official MET police crime statistics. Again like the woman in the audience on itv last night people on here making racist accusations and just looking at hysterical newspaper headlines, without looking deeper into it and what was actually said at the time. It now turns out after some investigations in the media that woman who berated Farage in the audience on itv last night is a Huffington Post blogger (not sure why anyone should be surprised by that though?). "
he made the claim in may 2014 on a live radio interview never backed it up with met statistics also said people would rather live next door Germans than Romanians listen to the interview a d stop supporting a racist sexist homophobic party leader .... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Farridge is a narrow minded bigot who's been given life because of racism and economic woes driven by the global recession.
In an otherwise calm climate he'd be seen as an egotistical prick, an opportunist, a nasty piece of work. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *HaRiFMan
over a year ago
Beyond the shadows. |
"
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here."
Well it’s only an open door policy for people already living in the EU wanting to enter the UK, due to EU rules on free movement of people; the UK must admit EU citizens and their family members. As regards most non-EU citizens, the UK still controls its borders.
As far as immigrants coming from outside the EU the UK will not gain any extra powers to control their entry compared to the powers it has already. So to re iterate for those immigrants the UK (should it choose to) can already apply the terms you’ve stated
“a) What people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms” Just like the Australians.
Now let’s go back to the EU citizens, if the UK were to leave the European political union (by the way the reason we did not voted for it was most probably we were either too young or a twinkle in our parents eyes, but the UK citizens that were around and eligible at the time did vote for) but still wanted to trade in the single market which we most likely will want to do then the UK will have to accept the EU terms and conditions set out will inevitably mean accepting the free movement of EU citizens. Just like Norway and Switzerland (the examples people like to give) are having to do.
So as you can see as far as immigration is concerned there will be no difference. So those purported millions of Turkish waiting to rush the UK soon as they join the EU (it’s looking difficult for them to join at the moment) will be coming weather we are in or out of the European political union.
The only way the UK can stop the free movement of EU citizens is to leave the European single market as well as the European Union. But why would the UK want to leave the single market, after all if you were a trader trading on eBay or amazon and prospering why would you then want to leave that to go trade on gum tree?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here.
Well it’s only an open door policy for people already living in the EU wanting to enter the UK, due to EU rules on free movement of people; the UK must admit EU citizens and their family members. As regards most non-EU citizens, the UK still controls its borders.
As far as immigrants coming from outside the EU the UK will not gain any extra powers to control their entry compared to the powers it has already. So to re iterate for those immigrants the UK (should it choose to) can already apply the terms you’ve stated
“a) What people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms” Just like the Australians.
Now let’s go back to the EU citizens, if the UK were to leave the European political union (by the way the reason we did not voted for it was most probably we were either too young or a twinkle in our parents eyes, but the UK citizens that were around and eligible at the time did vote for) but still wanted to trade in the single market which we most likely will want to do then the UK will have to accept the EU terms and conditions set out will inevitably mean accepting the free movement of EU citizens. Just like Norway and Switzerland (the examples people like to give) are having to do.
So as you can see as far as immigration is concerned there will be no difference. So those purported millions of Turkish waiting to rush the UK soon as they join the EU (it’s looking difficult for them to join at the moment) will be coming weather we are in or out of the European political union.
The only way the UK can stop the free movement of EU citizens is to leave the European single market as well as the European Union. But why would the UK want to leave the single market, after all if you were a trader trading on eBay or amazon and prospering why would you then want to leave that to go trade on gum tree?
"
Bit of a strange example to use, as you don't need to be in the single market to buy stuff from eBay or Amazon. USA are not in the EU or the single market, we don't even have any kind of trade deal with them, yet you can buy stuff from USA on ebay or Amazon, there are probably even ads on Gumtree from USA if you look hard enough. Point is the EU is outdated and past its sell by date, an analogue union in a now digital age. We live in a globalised world and people trade globally over the internet without the need for trade deals. The EU is a relic of the past.
The single market is not a magic bullet for free trade anyway, we pay billions every year in EU membership fees to access the single market so that is a tariff of sorts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here.
Well it’s only an open door policy for people already living in the EU wanting to enter the UK, due to EU rules on free movement of people; the UK must admit EU citizens and their family members. As regards most non-EU citizens, the UK still controls its borders.
As far as immigrants coming from outside the EU the UK will not gain any extra powers to control their entry compared to the powers it has already. So to re iterate for those immigrants the UK (should it choose to) can already apply the terms you’ve stated
“a) What people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms” Just like the Australians.
Now let’s go back to the EU citizens, if the UK were to leave the European political union (by the way the reason we did not voted for it was most probably we were either too young or a twinkle in our parents eyes, but the UK citizens that were around and eligible at the time did vote for) but still wanted to trade in the single market which we most likely will want to do then the UK will have to accept the EU terms and conditions set out will inevitably mean accepting the free movement of EU citizens. Just like Norway and Switzerland (the examples people like to give) are having to do.
So as you can see as far as immigration is concerned there will be no difference. So those purported millions of Turkish waiting to rush the UK soon as they join the EU (it’s looking difficult for them to join at the moment) will be coming weather we are in or out of the European political union.
The only way the UK can stop the free movement of EU citizens is to leave the European single market as well as the European Union. But why would the UK want to leave the single market, after all if you were a trader trading on eBay or amazon and prospering why would you then want to leave that to go trade on gum tree?
Bit of a strange example to use, as you don't need to be in the single market to buy stuff from eBay or Amazon. USA are not in the EU or the single market, we don't even have any kind of trade deal with them, yet you can buy stuff from USA on ebay or Amazon, there are probably even ads on Gumtree from USA if you look hard enough. Point is the EU is outdated and past its sell by date, an analogue union in a now digital age. We live in a globalised world and people trade globally over the internet without the need for trade deals. The EU is a relic of the past.
The single market is not a magic bullet for free trade anyway, we pay billions every year in EU membership fees to access the single market so that is a tariff of sorts. "
the UK signed a trade deal with china in 2014 cost the UK 29 million in aid to china and they slap up to 45% import tax on motor vehicles we send there not really free trade with any country ..because there is only free trade within the EU for EU members ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"Or a rush to invest in the UK"
i so love the nievity of that comment..... your comments always crack me up....
oh yeah.... like dan ask.... can we have detail on this please?
p.s "hope" isn't a strategy..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *HaRiFMan
over a year ago
Beyond the shadows. |
"
Bit of a strange example to use, as you don't need to be in the single market to buy stuff from eBay or Amazon. USA are not in the EU or the single market, we don't even have any kind of trade deal with them, yet you can buy stuff from USA on ebay or Amazon, there are probably even ads on Gumtree from USA if you look hard enough.
"
I was giving the example to emphasise the difference in market size. A trader trading on eBay/Amazon has access to a bigger customer base then one trading on gum tree. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Bit of a strange example to use, as you don't need to be in the single market to buy stuff from eBay or Amazon. USA are not in the EU or the single market, we don't even have any kind of trade deal with them, yet you can buy stuff from USA on ebay or Amazon, there are probably even ads on Gumtree from USA if you look hard enough.
I was giving the example to emphasise the difference in market size. A trader trading on eBay/Amazon has access to a bigger customer base then one trading on gum tree."
Does the single market really mean you can buy something on amazon or ebay . F*$k me Mastricht really was over-rated !! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here.
Well it’s only an open door policy for people already living in the EU wanting to enter the UK, due to EU rules on free movement of people; the UK must admit EU citizens and their family members. As regards most non-EU citizens, the UK still controls its borders.
As far as immigrants coming from outside the EU the UK will not gain any extra powers to control their entry compared to the powers it has already. So to re iterate for those immigrants the UK (should it choose to) can already apply the terms you’ve stated
“a) What people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms” Just like the Australians.
Now let’s go back to the EU citizens, if the UK were to leave the European political union (by the way the reason we did not voted for it was most probably we were either too young or a twinkle in our parents eyes, but the UK citizens that were around and eligible at the time did vote for) but still wanted to trade in the single market which we most likely will want to do then the UK will have to accept the EU terms and conditions set out will inevitably mean accepting the free movement of EU citizens. Just like Norway and Switzerland (the examples people like to give) are having to do.
So as you can see as far as immigration is concerned there will be no difference. So those purported millions of Turkish waiting to rush the UK soon as they join the EU (it’s looking difficult for them to join at the moment) will be coming weather we are in or out of the European political union.
The only way the UK can stop the free movement of EU citizens is to leave the European single market as well as the European Union. But why would the UK want to leave the single market, after all if you were a trader trading on eBay or amazon and prospering why would you then want to leave that to go trade on gum tree?
Bit of a strange example to use, as you don't need to be in the single market to buy stuff from eBay or Amazon. USA are not in the EU or the single market, we don't even have any kind of trade deal with them, yet you can buy stuff from USA on ebay or Amazon, there are probably even ads on Gumtree from USA if you look hard enough. Point is the EU is outdated and past its sell by date, an analogue union in a now digital age. We live in a globalised world and people trade globally over the internet without the need for trade deals. The EU is a relic of the past.
The single market is not a magic bullet for free trade anyway, we pay billions every year in EU membership fees to access the single market so that is a tariff of sorts. the UK signed a trade deal with china in 2014 cost the UK 29 million in aid to china and they slap up to 45% import tax on motor vehicles we send there not really free trade with any country ..because there is only free trade within the EU for EU members ..."
Thats false as we can't sign our own British trade deals while we are members of the EU. We only get EU trade deals negotiated by the EU as members of the EU. Its partly why EU trade deals take years and years and years to reach conclusion because you have to get agreement between 28 member countries. We could do them much quicker on a 1 to 1 country basis ouside of the EU, negotiated by British representatives instead of a faceless EU Eurocrat. Secondly despite the tariffs you say China slap on our motor cars, one of Jaguar/Land Rover biggest customers is the Chinese market, we export loads of Jaguar/Land Rover cars over there because they love our product and tariffs are no barrier to trade if someone wants a product they will pay the price for it. That is how business works between buyers and sellers. One of CAT/JCB biggest markets is also China, again they think our JCB diggers and earth movers are quality products so they pay the price including the tariff.
Lastly we are not getting free trade with EU members because we pay an EU membership fee, so we are paying for access to the single market. There is an old saying "No such thing as a free lunch in this world". |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Bit of a strange example to use, as you don't need to be in the single market to buy stuff from eBay or Amazon. USA are not in the EU or the single market, we don't even have any kind of trade deal with them, yet you can buy stuff from USA on ebay or Amazon, there are probably even ads on Gumtree from USA if you look hard enough.
I was giving the example to emphasise the difference in market size. A trader trading on eBay/Amazon has access to a bigger customer base then one trading on gum tree."
if you buy stuff on ebay theirs a custom charge on anything over £135 and uk vat added on anything over £15 because theirs no free trading between countries is that not the point of the single market withing the eu ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" Secondly despite the tariffs you say China slap on our motor cars, one of Jaguar/Land Rover biggest customers is the Chinese market, we export loads of Jaguar/Land Rover cars over there because they love our product and tariffs are no barrier to trade if someone wants a product they will pay the price for it. "
JLR Chinese sales down 10%
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/12152076/Profits-tumble-at-Jaguar-Land-Rover-despite-record-sales.html |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
No so bad for JCB though
http://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/bric-downturn-softens-jcb-sales
"While the UK construction equipment market was up 30% in 2014 and the USA was up 13%, the market in Brazil fell 17% last year, Russia by 27%, India by 15% cent and China by 17%." |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Thats false as we can't sign our own British trade deals while we are members of the EU. We only get EU trade deals negotiated by the EU as members of the EU. Its partly why EU trade deals take years and years and years to reach conclusion because you have to get agreement between 28 member countries. We could do them much quicker on a 1 to 1 country basis ouside of the EU, negotiated by British representatives instead of a faceless EU Eurocrat. "
Actually all of the above is completely untrue: UK is at liberty to conclude trade deals with anyone it pleases .sll that is required ( since we are members of the EU ) is that goods incoming are EU compliant .
As far as time is concerned; the EU is remarkably quick at concluding trade deals . That it takes ages is a complete myth, with no basis; compare deals made by and between countries such as the US, Canada, Australia, China India, and compare them with Deals made by the EU .
I mean truth, not UKIP/ BREXIT lies.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Well yes and no. It IS about leaving the European Union (which we never voted for) and we WILL have to leave Single Market. But it is most certainly about immigration as whenj we DO leave we can control a) what people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms. As has been said it works for Australia. And before we get the 'per capita' nonsense yes Australia lets in more than we do (per capita but not the same volume) but they do NOT have an open door like we do and it is a very big country unlike here.
Well it’s only an open door policy for people already living in the EU wanting to enter the UK, due to EU rules on free movement of people; the UK must admit EU citizens and their family members. As regards most non-EU citizens, the UK still controls its borders.
As far as immigrants coming from outside the EU the UK will not gain any extra powers to control their entry compared to the powers it has already. So to re iterate for those immigrants the UK (should it choose to) can already apply the terms you’ve stated
“a) What people we need for our economy, b) How many we can support in our country and c) who we let in and under what terms” Just like the Australians.
Now let’s go back to the EU citizens, if the UK were to leave the European political union (by the way the reason we did not voted for it was most probably we were either too young or a twinkle in our parents eyes, but the UK citizens that were around and eligible at the time did vote for) but still wanted to trade in the single market which we most likely will want to do then the UK will have to accept the EU terms and conditions set out will inevitably mean accepting the free movement of EU citizens. Just like Norway and Switzerland (the examples people like to give) are having to do.
So as you can see as far as immigration is concerned there will be no difference. So those purported millions of Turkish waiting to rush the UK soon as they join the EU (it’s looking difficult for them to join at the moment) will be coming weather we are in or out of the European political union.
The only way the UK can stop the free movement of EU citizens is to leave the European single market as well as the European Union. But why would the UK want to leave the single market, after all if you were a trader trading on eBay or amazon and prospering why would you then want to leave that to go trade on gum tree?
Bit of a strange example to use, as you don't need to be in the single market to buy stuff from eBay or Amazon. USA are not in the EU or the single market, we don't even have any kind of trade deal with them, yet you can buy stuff from USA on ebay or Amazon, there are probably even ads on Gumtree from USA if you look hard enough. Point is the EU is outdated and past its sell by date, an analogue union in a now digital age. We live in a globalised world and people trade globally over the internet without the need for trade deals. The EU is a relic of the past.
The single market is not a magic bullet for free trade anyway, we pay billions every year in EU membership fees to access the single market so that is a tariff of sorts. the UK signed a trade deal with china in 2014 cost the UK 29 million in aid to china and they slap up to 45% import tax on motor vehicles we send there not really free trade with any country ..because there is only free trade within the EU for EU members ...
Thats false as we can't sign our own British trade deals while we are members of the EU. We only get EU trade deals negotiated by the EU as members of the EU. Its partly why EU trade deals take years and years and years to reach conclusion because you have to get agreement between 28 member countries. We could do them much quicker on a 1 to 1 country basis ouside of the EU, negotiated by British representatives instead of a faceless EU Eurocrat. Secondly despite the tariffs you say China slap on our motor cars, one of Jaguar/Land Rover biggest customers is the Chinese market, we export loads of Jaguar/Land Rover cars over there because they love our product and tariffs are no barrier to trade if someone wants a product they will pay the price for it. That is how business works between buyers and sellers. One of CAT/JCB biggest markets is also China, again they think our JCB diggers and earth movers are quality products so they pay the price including the tariff.
Lastly we are not getting free trade with EU members because we pay an EU membership fee, so we are paying for access to the single market. There is an old saying "No such thing as a free lunch in this world". "
start reading the truth we can do deals with other countries we did do a deal with china in June of 2014 the UK signed a trade with china worth 14 billion we gave china approx 24 million in aid to get it do your research and stop promoting ukip lies the UK can do trade deals with any country it wishes to .... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Or a rush to invest in the UK
i so love the nievity of that comment..... your comments always crack me up....
oh yeah.... like dan ask.... can we have detail on this please?
p.s "hope" isn't a strategy....."
Hope? Sure.
Possibility? Sure.
For too many reasons to list here.
Tell me, why would anyone invest in a country in Europe that is out of the Eurozone? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *artytwoCouple
over a year ago
Wolverhampton |
"Farridge is a narrow minded bigot who's been given life because of racism and economic woes driven by the global recession.
In an otherwise calm climate he'd be seen as an egotistical prick, an opportunist, a nasty piece of work."
He should join Fab forums then, he'd have plenty of company |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
