FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Pro...or anti .........
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think there was an expectations that it would be overturned with the new brokeback coalition...i also think they're biding their time, but it will happen. i'm against anything having to die under the auspices of entertainment. no different to dog fighting or cock fights....which are both illegal and never set to return. only difference is it keeps the gentry amused" couldnt of said it better myself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually rode on a hunt once and no never again Very anti xx " fuck me cant imagine you sitting on the back of the hound soapy, long way to the ground if you fell off babe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually rode on a hunt once and no never again Very anti xx " Shetland Pony? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually rode on a hunt once and no never again Very anti xx fuck me cant imagine you sitting on the back of the hound soapy, long way to the ground if you fell off babe" xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually rode on a hunt once and no never again Very anti xx fuck me cant imagine you sitting on the back of the hound soapy, long way to the ground if you fell off babe" lmfao | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually rode on a hunt once and no never again Very anti xx fuck me cant imagine you sitting on the back of the hound soapy, long way to the ground if you fell off babe" Dont call Wendy a hound lol xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Actually rode on a hunt once and no never again Very anti xx fuck me cant imagine you sitting on the back of the hound soapy, long way to the ground if you fell off babe Dont call Wendy a hound lol xx " I'm telling her you said that!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hunting ? Just been watching steve wright and was somewhat amazed that the "big fight" was still raging. I know that there are now laws re dogs etc but didnt know to what extent the anti hunt were still fighting. Oh and im "anti hunt" by the way.. " Does "Minger Baiting" constitute as hunting? If so I`m Pro. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ok am v anti hunting wen it comes to like 20 mounted horses an a million dogs after 1 fox,or in da case of killin for skin,ivory etc but wud b pro hunting for da like of fishing an shooting game rabbit an that at least its al on a level playing field.. thoughts" level playing field? fish and game are armed too you mean? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ok am v anti hunting wen it comes to like 20 mounted horses an a million dogs after 1 fox,or in da case of killin for skin,ivory etc but wud b pro hunting for da like of fishing an shooting game rabbit an that at least its al on a level playing field.. thoughts" I dont mind people fishing etc... But they should eat what they kill. *Nearly wrote "fisting" then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pro. 1. Foxes are not cute and cuddly, they're nasty, vicious indiscriminate killers, known to attack and kill humans, livestock and domestic pets. 2. Many rural dwellers lost their livelihoods because of the ban - the kennels, the stables for the "rented" horses, local trade on hunt days etc etc. 3. Tens of thousands of animals, including foxes, are killed in the UK by cars on non-essential journeys, ie for "fun". The animal does not know the distinction between being killed by people on horseback for fun, or by people in cars for fun." so, in the same vein...we could bring back dog fighting then? amount of dogs left or abused, it doesnt matter huh? seal culling...beating them with planks of wood with nails driven through them that's ok right? there is a way to control the numbers without making it a blood sport that is what is fundamentally wrong...that it can be done for pleasure | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont know how true it is but i did read that some fellas had been caught "badger baiting" up north and ..... They were also into "dog fighting" Horrendous acts in themselves. people who are caught should be hung up by their gonads " Don't confuse these sick individuals with the pro-hunting people. Most pro-hunting people I know respect the countryside and the the need for pest control and conservation. Needless suffering, killing and sport is not part of the equation for most people. I've worked with the police to catch people doing this type of thing. And anyone who eats meat and wears leather is supporting the death of an animal - and often intensive raising/slaughter houses are infinately worse than any hunt under its current legislation. Vixen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The difference in eating meat and hunting is Most meat eaters dont do it to amuse themselves on a sunday morning and have the cow, pig , sheep torn to shreds by a pack of baying hounds " It is illegal to hunt in that way now. There has to be at least one person with a rifle close with the hounds so that if they put up quarry it can be dispatched quickly and humanely before the dogs even reach it. In my opinion anyone who does not kill quickly, humanely and for a reason other than sport is no better than the scum who shoot air rifles at cats on a housing estate, badger bait, dog fight or any of the hundreds of other urban and rural abuses of animals supposedly in our care. Vixen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The farm down the road to me has no problems with foxes....he shoots them, what he doesn't do is charge toffs to come down for the day, rent a horse and ride aroundlike something out of the nineteenth century. By shooting them he also doesn't make them endure being chased for miles before being ripped to shreds by a pack of dogs. Foxes are vermin yes....but no need to hunt them down with dogs all the time the farmer holds a shotgun license." Not all people that go fox hunting are toffs you get a wide range of people from all walks of life | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The farm down the road to me has no problems with foxes....he shoots them, what he doesn't do is charge toffs to come down for the day, rent a horse and ride aroundlike something out of the nineteenth century. By shooting them he also doesn't make them endure being chased for miles before being ripped to shreds by a pack of dogs. Foxes are vermin yes....but no need to hunt them down with dogs all the time the farmer holds a shotgun license." Not that I'm against farmers having guns (in fact I think gun laws in this country are too tight) but saying it's ok to shoot a fox just because you're against people riding around doesn't make it better. I don't see anything wrong with toffs even though I'm a million miles away from being one lol! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The farm down the road to me has no problems with foxes....he shoots them, what he doesn't do is charge toffs to come down for the day, rent a horse and ride aroundlike something out of the nineteenth century. By shooting them he also doesn't make them endure being chased for miles before being ripped to shreds by a pack of dogs. Foxes are vermin yes....but no need to hunt them down with dogs all the time the farmer holds a shotgun license." the whole point of a hunt is that with a pack of dogs only the ill and old will get caught with a gun they stand no change and often the farmers aim is off so he will end up just hurting it and then it will crawl off and die somewhere . mind it will be a slow and painful death not the fast one it wud of gotten with a dog who is trained to kill with one bite | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i am deffo 100% PRO hunting and this summer will be attending hunts dont like it thats up to you yes now we have to follow a pre laid route but its all good fun and the goverment will overturn the ban in time when the foxes become even more trouble than they are now " Do they do drag hunting in this country now the ban is in ?? I used to live in Italy and remeber seeing drag hunting there ps when i say drag hunting I dont mean men in frocks being chased around the country lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The farm down the road to me has no problems with foxes....he shoots them, what he doesn't do is charge toffs to come down for the day, rent a horse and ride aroundlike something out of the nineteenth century. By shooting them he also doesn't make them endure being chased for miles before being ripped to shreds by a pack of dogs. Foxes are vermin yes....but no need to hunt them down with dogs all the time the farmer holds a shotgun license. the whole point of a hunt is that with a pack of dogs only the ill and old will get caught with a gun they stand no change and often the farmers aim is off so he will end up just hurting it and then it will crawl off and die somewhere . mind it will be a slow and painful death not the fast one it wud of gotten with a dog who is trained to kill with one bite " Have to ask....how do they train a dog to kill with one bite? They let them loose in packs to rip foxes apart when caught....it's sport and nothing less than sport | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i am deffo 100% PRO hunting and this summer will be attending hunts dont like it thats up to you yes now we have to follow a pre laid route but its all good fun and the goverment will overturn the ban in time when the foxes become even more trouble than they are now " But they aren't any more trouble are they?....There is no glut or over population of foxes on Dartmoor....they shoot them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm sort of anti. I'd quite like to go on a hunt, just without the fox part. Does that count? " totally! and there are many scent hunts that are run that way....except some find it an anti climax unless there is actual blood at the end of it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm sort of anti. I'd quite like to go on a hunt, just without the fox part. Does that count? totally! and there are many scent hunts that are run that way....except some find it an anti climax unless there is actual blood at the end of it" Well that's a no brainer... why would you harm an animal when you can achieve the same event without? Weirdos! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pro....used to go to the Totnes boxing days hunts, never saw them bag a fox in the 7 years I went but it was a good social day. " The dogs had eaten them before they got back.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No chance of it being overturned. the coalition now is to the left of what Labour was before it. " You kiddin'? Cameron, Osborne, Gove and Co. are well to the right of Atilla the Hun. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No chance of it being overturned. the coalition now is to the left of what Labour was before it. You kiddin'? Cameron, Osborne, Gove and Co. are well to the right of Atilla the Hun." In what way are they? Just because they went to Eton doesn't make them right wing. They've kept loads of Labour policies, haven't brought Grammar schools back, aren't touching NHS spending, are committed to the EU, slashing defence spending... They have hardly any conservative (small c) policies at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Do they do drag hunting in this country now the ban is in ?? I used to live in Italy and remeber seeing drag hunting there ps when i say drag hunting I dont mean men in frocks being chased around the country lol " drag hunting - at least as far as I know - is perfectly legal in the UK. which raises the question as to why the pro-hunt lot are so up in arms. all of the main arguments they use like keeping rural jobs and traditions can be maintained perfectly adequately by a drag hunt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No chance of it being overturned. the coalition now is to the left of what Labour was before it. You kiddin'? Cameron, Osborne, Gove and Co. are well to the right of Atilla the Hun. In what way are they? Just because they went to Eton doesn't make them right wing. They've kept loads of Labour policies, haven't brought Grammar schools back, aren't touching NHS spending, are committed to the EU, slashing defence spending... They have hardly any conservative (small c) policies at all." Give them time. Once the 1922 guys get a bit more used to coalition politics we'll see what comes out of the recently dramatically increased No10 policy unit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"pro hunting as do alot of it myself " Like wise and I am definitely pro hunting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"pro hunting as do alot of it myself " I think we should make a distinction between hunting with dogs vs hunting with a gun or whatever. The latter is usually very quick, the former is what most people mean by anti hunting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"pro hunting as do alot of it myself I think we should make a distinction between hunting with dogs vs hunting with a gun or whatever. The latter is usually very quick, the former is what most people mean by anti hunting. " I have participated in both. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No chance of it being overturned. the coalition now is to the left of what Labour was before it. You kiddin'? Cameron, Osborne, Gove and Co. are well to the right of Atilla the Hun. In what way are they? Just because they went to Eton doesn't make them right wing. They've kept loads of Labour policies, haven't brought Grammar schools back, aren't touching NHS spending, are committed to the EU, slashing defence spending... They have hardly any conservative (small c) policies at all. Give them time. Once the 1922 guys get a bit more used to coalition politics we'll see what comes out of the recently dramatically increased No10 policy unit." I think you've answered your own question there. The 'increased' policy unit. Surely they'd be cutting down on the size of the state rather than adding more civil servants if they were right wing? Cameron called himself the heir to Blair and now he has the perfect cover with the Lib Dems as partners to keep the Progressive politics going. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im Anti, have been on a few hunts sabotaging (non violent) Hunting for food is acceptable (but questionable i'll agree) but hunting for fun is definately wrong in my books. They claim its pest control; i have spoken to the farmers around the fields and they say they just shoot the fox if it causes any trouble to their chickens/etc. Not humane but effective. Having legions of horses and dogs chase one fox is just bullying, pathetic and cruel. If you really need to kill a small animal to satisfy your small cock syndrome then get your fat arse off your horse and go one on one with the fox. " How can hunting for food be questionnable??? How did we survive without doing it? Not sure whether having a small cock was the reason fox hunting started as well but happy to be proven wrong lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No chance of it being overturned. the coalition now is to the left of what Labour was before it. You kiddin'? Cameron, Osborne, Gove and Co. are well to the right of Atilla the Hun. In what way are they? Just because they went to Eton doesn't make them right wing. They've kept loads of Labour policies, haven't brought Grammar schools back, aren't touching NHS spending, are committed to the EU, slashing defence spending... They have hardly any conservative (small c) policies at all. Give them time. Once the 1922 guys get a bit more used to coalition politics we'll see what comes out of the recently dramatically increased No10 policy unit. I think you've answered your own question there. The 'increased' policy unit. Surely they'd be cutting down on the size of the state rather than adding more civil servants if they were right wing? ................." That very point was put to Francis Maude at lunchtime today and he all but admitted that, whilst their instinct was small(er) government, the reality (as demonstrated by recent u-turns) is that there has been a serious lack of joined-up thinking behind the scenes in Downing Street. Hence the need for more policy wallahs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" How can hunting for food be questionnable??? How did we survive without doing it? ............" Few, if any, of use NEED to hunt for food nowadays. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im Anti, have been on a few hunts sabotaging (non violent) Hunting for food is acceptable (but questionable i'll agree) but hunting for fun is definately wrong in my books. They claim its pest control; i have spoken to the farmers around the fields and they say they just shoot the fox if it causes any trouble to their chickens/etc. Not humane but effective. Having legions of horses and dogs chase one fox is just bullying, pathetic and cruel. If you really need to kill a small animal to satisfy your small cock syndrome then get your fat arse off your horse and go one on one with the fox. " I dont think cock size has anything to do with hunting lol plus there are a lot of women who hunt what do you call them small pussy syndrome ?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" How can hunting for food be questionnable??? How did we survive without doing it? ............ Few, if any, of use NEED to hunt for food nowadays. " Isn't the end result of killing an animal the same no matter how you do it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im Anti, have been on a few hunts sabotaging (non violent) Hunting for food is acceptable (but questionable i'll agree) but hunting for fun is definately wrong in my books. They claim its pest control; i have spoken to the farmers around the fields and they say they just shoot the fox if it causes any trouble to their chickens/etc. Not humane but effective. Having legions of horses and dogs chase one fox is just bullying, pathetic and cruel. If you really need to kill a small animal to satisfy your small cock syndrome then get your fat arse off your horse and go one on one with the fox. I dont think cock size has anything to do with hunting lol plus there are a lot of women who hunt what do you call them small pussy syndrome ?? " Nope it would have to be large pussy syndrome as we would want it smaller lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No chance of it being overturned. the coalition now is to the left of what Labour was before it. You kiddin'? Cameron, Osborne, Gove and Co. are well to the right of Atilla the Hun. In what way are they? Just because they went to Eton doesn't make them right wing. They've kept loads of Labour policies, haven't brought Grammar schools back, aren't touching NHS spending, are committed to the EU, slashing defence spending... They have hardly any conservative (small c) policies at all. Give them time. Once the 1922 guys get a bit more used to coalition politics we'll see what comes out of the recently dramatically increased No10 policy unit. I think you've answered your own question there. The 'increased' policy unit. Surely they'd be cutting down on the size of the state rather than adding more civil servants if they were right wing? ................. That very point was put to Francis Maude at lunchtime today and he all but admitted that, whilst their instinct was small(er) government, the reality (as demonstrated by recent u-turns) is that there has been a serious lack of joined-up thinking behind the scenes in Downing Street. Hence the need for more policy wallahs. " Still not selling the right wing idea to me... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im Anti, have been on a few hunts sabotaging (non violent) Hunting for food is acceptable (but questionable i'll agree) but hunting for fun is definately wrong in my books. They claim its pest control; i have spoken to the farmers around the fields and they say they just shoot the fox if it causes any trouble to their chickens/etc. Not humane but effective. Having legions of horses and dogs chase one fox is just bullying, pathetic and cruel. If you really need to kill a small animal to satisfy your small cock syndrome then get your fat arse off your horse and go one on one with the fox. I dont think cock size has anything to do with hunting lol plus there are a lot of women who hunt what do you call them small pussy syndrome ?? Nope it would have to be large pussy syndrome as we would want it smaller lol " hahaha took a few mins to work that one out lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" How can hunting for food be questionnable??? How did we survive without doing it? ............ Few, if any, of use NEED to hunt for food nowadays. Isn't the end result of killing an animal the same no matter how you do it? " As i said on an earlier post having rode on a hunt in my younger years and actually seen a fox torn to shreds by dogs after they have run it to ground Then yes the result is the same (IE they die)but the way it gets to that point is far from the same Most animals are killed humanely Not tortured to death | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" How can hunting for food be questionnable??? How did we survive without doing it? ............ Few, if any, of use NEED to hunt for food nowadays. Isn't the end result of killing an animal the same no matter how you do it? As i said on an earlier post having rode on a hunt in my younger years and actually seen a fox torn to shreds by dogs after they have run it to ground Then yes the result is the same (IE they die)but the way it gets to that point is far from the same Most animals are killed humanely Not tortured to death" How can you kill something humanely? Not exactly very charitable to kill anything. I know what you're trying to say, but the political issue wasn't the fox's suffering. It was giving the fingers to the 'toffs'. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" How can hunting for food be questionnable??? How did we survive without doing it? ............ Few, if any, of use NEED to hunt for food nowadays. Isn't the end result of killing an animal the same no matter how you do it? " D'ye mean 'how' or 'why'? Ultimately the animal/ fish is still dead but I'd never countenance the killing of any animal purely for sport or by any method which causes unnecessary suffering. Genuinely killing for the pot where no alternative exists (ie no money, no shops), provided it's done as humanely as possible, is OK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i am deffo 100% PRO hunting and this summer will be attending hunts dont like it thats up to you yes now we have to follow a pre laid route but its all good fun and the goverment will overturn the ban in time when the foxes become even more trouble than they are now " Don't want to burst your bubble but.... Fox hunting with dogs isn't carried out in the summer, don't know what sort of fox hunts you have been to but the season doesn't start until November | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason" im not a toff and i dont have loads of money | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason" Dont be suchj a toffist Cornwall bet you wouyuldnt say no to a bit of fur coat n no knickers hahah | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason Dont be suchj a toffist Cornwall bet you wouyuldnt say no to a bit of fur coat n no knickers hahah " I dont know which made me laugh more, the fact I am seen as a toff!....or the fur coat and no knickers lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason im not a toff and i dont have loads of money " ok in general then. not aimed at you in particular sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason Dont be suchj a toffist Cornwall bet you wouyuldnt say no to a bit of fur coat n no knickers hahah " PS why is it everyone seems to think the only people who go hunting are posh upper class its not true you get people from all types of backgrounds who hunt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason Dont be suchj a toffist Cornwall bet you wouyuldnt say no to a bit of fur coat n no knickers hahah " lol you silly sod lol xxx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure." So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason im not a toff and i dont have loads of money ok in general then. not aimed at you in particular sorry " not a problem mate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun." you point holds no weight at all. most farmers are using machines and any with a shot gun method needs to modernise. but is the farmer doing it for fun? no. for a living. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"anti. just a bunch of arragant toffs with money killing for no reason Dont be suchj a toffist Cornwall bet you wouyuldnt say no to a bit of fur coat n no knickers hahah I dont know which made me laugh more, the fact I am seen as a toff!....or the fur coat and no knickers lol" Would rather be seen as a Toff than a Chav lol runs off to seee if I have a fur coat in my wardrobe lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun." The fox dies instantly, shot with a gun, what makes you think that is the same as being chaced for miles and hours before getting riped to bits by a pack of hounds? lets give the choice to a human, see which kind of death they would prefer? Fox hunting is barbaric not matter what way you try to justify it, as a human its not our god given right to, kill everything that was on thus planet before us , just cause we can | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun." Neither method is really acceptable but i certainly know which is generally (i say generally because of course sometimes foxes can be just wounded)quickest xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. you point holds no weight at all. most farmers are using machines and any with a shot gun method needs to modernise. but is the farmer doing it for fun? no. for a living. " Killing with a machine? Ohhh, that's ok then. A machine is very kind. I agree with the farmer killing them. I also feel sorry for all the people who lost their jobs when hunting was banned. No thought for their living either? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone tell me how they kill vermin nicely? A nice slow poison perhaps? A trap?" to prevent diesase maybe then yes. a trap is quick but poison not so good. i personally would trap and release. i dont agree with traps and poison. still dont compare or excuse killing for fun. dont matter what anyone says. hunting is wrong cos of the reason and method. everything else your comparing to has warranted reason and/or method. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. The fox dies instantly, shot with a gun, what makes you think that is the same as being chaced for miles and hours before getting riped to bits by a pack of hounds? lets give the choice to a human, see which kind of death they would prefer? Fox hunting is barbaric not matter what way you try to justify it, as a human its not our god given right to, kill everything that was on thus planet before us , just cause we can" It's a fox though, not a human. And you're still killing it with a gun. Not like you're taking it on holiday afterwards. You can't say don't kill it one way but then say it's ok to kill it another. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. you point holds no weight at all. most farmers are using machines and any with a shot gun method needs to modernise. but is the farmer doing it for fun? no. for a living. Killing with a machine? Ohhh, that's ok then. A machine is very kind. I agree with the farmer killing them. I also feel sorry for all the people who lost their jobs when hunting was banned. No thought for their living either?" And what about all those poor hounds most have to be destroyed because they cant be rehomed as domestic pets | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. you point holds no weight at all. most farmers are using machines and any with a shot gun method needs to modernise. but is the farmer doing it for fun? no. for a living. Killing with a machine? Ohhh, that's ok then. A machine is very kind. I agree with the farmer killing them. I also feel sorry for all the people who lost their jobs when hunting was banned. No thought for their living either?" yes a machine is ok to kill to feed us humans. would you prefer to be thrown to the lions and be eaten painfully torn apart while wewatch cos its fun. or have your head chopped off for food. get real. the people who lost there job cn get nother one, its a job, not thre life. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. you point holds no weight at all. most farmers are using machines and any with a shot gun method needs to modernise. but is the farmer doing it for fun? no. for a living. Killing with a machine? Ohhh, that's ok then. A machine is very kind. I agree with the farmer killing them. I also feel sorry for all the people who lost their jobs when hunting was banned. No thought for their living either? yes a machine is ok to kill to feed us humans. would you prefer to be thrown to the lions and be eaten painfully torn apart while wewatch cos its fun. or have your head chopped off for food. get real. the people who lost there job cn get nother one, its a job, not thre life." not sure how to answer that. First, a fox isn't generally eaten. Second, humans aren't generally eaten. Third, brilliant advice about the jobs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. The fox dies instantly, shot with a gun, what makes you think that is the same as being chaced for miles and hours before getting riped to bits by a pack of hounds? lets give the choice to a human, see which kind of death they would prefer? Fox hunting is barbaric not matter what way you try to justify it, as a human its not our god given right to, kill everything that was on thus planet before us , just cause we can It's a fox though, not a human. And you're still killing it with a gun. Not like you're taking it on holiday afterwards. You can't say don't kill it one way but then say it's ok to kill it another. " method of killing does matter. but still not getting a case from you why killing for fun is ok but killing for food isnt. very weak case | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A trap is not quick...have you ever found one where an animal has tried to chew its leg off to get away? foxes are vermin. You may not agree with the hunting for sport method ( although a kill is not made on every hunt), but I bet people do not give a second thought to setting up a mouse trap or rat poison to kill the vermin. Not a sport, but still causing suffering to an animal that is having an effect on thier home/business/belongings etc. Are you eating them after you have killed them? Or is it more aceptable to kill that kind of pest slowly? Maybe because they are not as cute as a fox? " thats a very good point about the trap not bing quick, i agreed. point well made. but i did say i dont like or agree wih them and would just trap and release. in like a box so nothing was hurt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you can kill something humanly by doing it quick and for food. not ripped apart for pleasure. So being blasted to pieces with a shotgun is quick and humane? I know you're not saying that, but it seems that a lot of people who don't agree with dogs hunting foxes are ok for Farmer Giles to blow seven shades out of it with a harmless shotgun. The fox dies instantly, shot with a gun, what makes you think that is the same as being chaced for miles and hours before getting riped to bits by a pack of hounds? lets give the choice to a human, see which kind of death they would prefer? Fox hunting is barbaric not matter what way you try to justify it, as a human its not our god given right to, kill everything that was on thus planet before us , just cause we can It's a fox though, not a human. And you're still killing it with a gun. Not like you're taking it on holiday afterwards. You can't say don't kill it one way but then say it's ok to kill it another. method of killing does matter. but still not getting a case from you why killing for fun is ok but killing for food isnt. very weak case" I never said killing for food isn't ok. Of course it is or how would we eat meat? The fox hunting thing and being concerned about the fox isn't the main story. If it was then all animal slaughter would be banned. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"hunting as been going on thusands of years its just done a little different these days, but no matter what way you look at it its alot better than pumping even more money into the super markets and fast food places that are taking over the world " A little fact of life for you....if it wasn't for supermarkets, and their continuing price wars in the UK, food prices would be an awful lot more than they are today.....their battle to beat each other has kept our food prices artificially low. If you want to see what it would be like if we never had four or five multiples fighting for our groceries business then look at many other countries where competition is less fierce. Australia, New Zealand, Scandinavia, Holland to name but a few where groceries are up to half as much again as ours in their shops. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A trap is not quick...have you ever found one where an animal has tried to chew its leg off to get away? foxes are vermin. You may not agree with the hunting for sport method ( although a kill is not made on every hunt), but I bet people do not give a second thought to setting up a mouse trap or rat poison to kill the vermin. Not a sport, but still causing suffering to an animal that is having an effect on thier home/business/belongings etc. Are you eating them after you have killed them? Or is it more aceptable to kill that kind of pest slowly? Maybe because they are not as cute as a fox? thats a very good point about the trap not bing quick, i agreed. point well made. but i did say i dont like or agree wih them and would just trap and release. in like a box so nothing was hurt." Yes, I noticed you mentioned that. It was more a point of people distinguishing between humane killing with regards vermin. People tend ot get emotional over a nice fluffy fox which is vermin, but would they have the same feelings to a rat if it was doing damage? You don't see people shooting them with guns! If they don't poison them themselves they call pest control to do it for them. I know the focus seems to be because hunting is a sport, the end result seems to be the suffering of the animal that causes peoples hackles to rise. Hence me trying to show the comparison between the fox suffering and the rat...neither of which are killed to be eaten....How come it is more acceptable to slowly poison a rat then kill a fox with dogs? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"put it this way. if foxes were hunted and killed quickly by whatever method, and not by another nimal or for pleasure. just to kep population down and diesease etc, then people wouldnt have a problem with it. can i just ad, what a great debate this is with you guys. big respect for your point of _iews and opinions by the way." Agreed on both points! Over and out for me until later. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you will find that at least one of the Pro Hunting members on here is posting for effect, anyone involved in fox hunting with dogs would know it doesn't take place in the summer... Season starts on or around the first Sunday in November. So a wind up..... " Always thought the riding to hunt was an autumn event. I know my outlaws used to ride to a Somerset hunt on Boxing day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A trap is not quick...have you ever found one where an animal has tried to chew its leg off to get away? foxes are vermin. You may not agree with the hunting for sport method ( although a kill is not made on every hunt), but I bet people do not give a second thought to setting up a mouse trap or rat poison to kill the vermin. Not a sport, but still causing suffering to an animal that is having an effect on thier home/business/belongings etc. Are you eating them after you have killed them? Or is it more aceptable to kill that kind of pest slowly? Maybe because they are not as cute as a fox? thats a very good point about the trap not bing quick, i agreed. point well made. but i did say i dont like or agree wih them and would just trap and release. in like a box so nothing was hurt. Yes, I noticed you mentioned that. It was more a point of people distinguishing between humane killing with regards vermin. People tend ot get emotional over a nice fluffy fox which is vermin, but would they have the same feelings to a rat if it was doing damage? You don't see people shooting them with guns! If they don't poison them themselves they call pest control to do it for them. I know the focus seems to be because hunting is a sport, the end result seems to be the suffering of the animal that causes peoples hackles to rise. Hence me trying to show the comparison between the fox suffering and the rat...neither of which are killed to be eaten....How come it is more acceptable to slowly poison a rat then kill a fox with dogs?" yes very good point again sepot. i think the two subjects are very simialar and certainly a lack of how vermine might die slowly etc. the only difference i can see is the sport side of it. but very good point well made | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"it just go's to show with the price battles were we paying to much in the first place, and why can they sell so cheap becaue it is cheap, you could keep the small family run butchers, bakers etc on the high streets if people paid a little extra for good food " All very well in wishy wishy world, but in the real world there are tens of thousands of families, maybe hundreds of thousands of families, in the UK who can't afford food prices as they are....let alone paying a 'little extra' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"put it this way. if foxes were hunted and killed quickly by whatever method, and not by another nimal or for pleasure. just to kep population down and diesease etc, then people wouldnt have a problem with it. can i just ad, what a great debate this is with you guys. big respect for your point of _iews and opinions by the way. Agreed on both points! Over and out for me until later." later danny. dont be long lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A trap is not quick...have you ever found one where an animal has tried to chew its leg off to get away? foxes are vermin. You may not agree with the hunting for sport method ( although a kill is not made on every hunt), but I bet people do not give a second thought to setting up a mouse trap or rat poison to kill the vermin. Not a sport, but still causing suffering to an animal that is having an effect on thier home/business/belongings etc. Are you eating them after you have killed them? Or is it more aceptable to kill that kind of pest slowly? Maybe because they are not as cute as a fox? thats a very good point about the trap not bing quick, i agreed. point well made. but i did say i dont like or agree wih them and would just trap and release. in like a box so nothing was hurt. Yes, I noticed you mentioned that. It was more a point of people distinguishing between humane killing with regards vermin. People tend ot get emotional over a nice fluffy fox which is vermin, but would they have the same feelings to a rat if it was doing damage? You don't see people shooting them with guns! If they don't poison them themselves they call pest control to do it for them. I know the focus seems to be because hunting is a sport, the end result seems to be the suffering of the animal that causes peoples hackles to rise. Hence me trying to show the comparison between the fox suffering and the rat...neither of which are killed to be eaten....How come it is more acceptable to slowly poison a rat then kill a fox with dogs? yes very good point again sepot. i think the two subjects are very simialar and certainly a lack of how vermine might die slowly etc. the only difference i can see is the sport side of it. but very good point well made" I participate in hunts for the sport. the good ride out with friends and if we have a kill then great, to me they are vermin and cause damage and kill livestock. I also shoot them if I find them on my land, so the ride out is not just to kill the fox! As I have said before, not every hunt results in a kill. So regardless of if it is a sport or not the end result for both comparisons I made between the rat and fox is a suffering animal....the fox dies quicker though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im Anti, have been on a few hunts sabotaging (non violent) Hunting for food is acceptable (but questionable i'll agree) but hunting for fun is definately wrong in my books. They claim its pest control; i have spoken to the farmers around the fields and they say they just shoot the fox if it causes any trouble to their chickens/etc. Not humane but effective. Having legions of horses and dogs chase one fox is just bullying, pathetic and cruel. If you really need to kill a small animal to satisfy your small cock syndrome then get your fat arse off your horse and go one on one with the fox. How can hunting for food be questionnable??? How did we survive without doing it? Not sure whether having a small cock was the reason fox hunting started as well but happy to be proven wrong lol" I mean the human race is at a point where we can farm fruit/vegetables and can survive without the need to hunt, even if it is natural for us to hunt. Its questionable now (and a major vegtarian arguement) as we have no real need to. But with all things in life; people dont like change! The small cock syndrome isnt to be taken literally... i mean it in the sense that someone who feels it necessary to act out in an attempt to gain respect and recognition from others, proving he is higher in the food chain, as i honestly cant see the desire to gang up and kill an animal just for fun | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i just cant wrap my head around using hounds to kill them and going out of your way to kill them. shooting to defend chickens or disease or your land etc fine. same reason as a rat. its a sport which kills. no sport should be for killing" At the risk of getting hate mail, if we have a kill, to me it is a bonus as it is another furry rodent gone...I cannot think of them as anything but vermin. So whether I hunt them on horseback with dogs or shoot them with a gun, the end result for me is the same...dead vermin. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i just cant wrap my head around using hounds to kill them and going out of your way to kill them. shooting to defend chickens or disease or your land etc fine. same reason as a rat. its a sport which kills. no sport should be for killing At the risk of getting hate mail, if we have a kill, to me it is a bonus as it is another furry rodent gone...I cannot think of them as anything but vermin. So whether I hunt them on horseback with dogs or shoot them with a gun, the end result for me is the same...dead vermin. " and thats why fox hunting is hated. no good reason for it with its methods and reasons. just imagine thats how people _iewed horses and did the same to them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i just cant wrap my head around using hounds to kill them and going out of your way to kill them. shooting to defend chickens or disease or your land etc fine. same reason as a rat. its a sport which kills. no sport should be for killing At the risk of getting hate mail, if we have a kill, to me it is a bonus as it is another furry rodent gone...I cannot think of them as anything but vermin. So whether I hunt them on horseback with dogs or shoot them with a gun, the end result for me is the same...dead vermin. " Well you certainly wont get any hate mail from me totaly agree with everything youve posted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i just cant wrap my head around using hounds to kill them and going out of your way to kill them. shooting to defend chickens or disease or your land etc fine. same reason as a rat. its a sport which kills. no sport should be for killing At the risk of getting hate mail, if we have a kill, to me it is a bonus as it is another furry rodent gone...I cannot think of them as anything but vermin. So whether I hunt them on horseback with dogs or shoot them with a gun, the end result for me is the same...dead vermin. and thats why fox hunting is hated. no good reason for it with its methods and reasons. just imagine thats how people _iewed horses and did the same to them" You have almost proven the point that is is because they are seen as a cute furry animal that people get emotional about it lol. For me it has reason and method. I enjoy hunting on a social level and if it results in getting rid of another fox, all the better....if there is no kill, then the ride out is always a pleasure. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"and note wyrdsis and Sexpot and Kinky you wont be geting any hate mail from me at all lol. i got nothing but respect for you guys and your open points of _iew. its good for us all to see two sides of something. your still lovely pink humans to me lol x" It is kinky here, and you are right, a good debate with both points of _iew is excellent fun. Nobody says we have to agree, it would be a boring debate if we did lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't be bothered to read 130+ posts so this might have been said somewhere else and if it has I apologise but the biggest blood sport in this country is of course fishing - but then the 'common' man is fully committed to this past time so it always falls under the radar. (puts hard hat on and goes and hides under the table)" But fish are not fluffy! Besides, some would argue that is is done for food as they eat the kill...after they have hooked its mouth and had it gasping before beating it on the head...others just make it suffer then chuck it back so it can go through it again with another fisherman lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You have almost proven the point that is is because they are seen as a cute furry animal that people get emotional about it lol. For me it has reason and method. I enjoy hunting on a social level and if it results in getting rid of another fox, all the better....if there is no kill, then the ride out is always a pleasure." if it's not about the kill...why are you all opposed to it being illegal? why not stick to scent hunts...if it is purely for the pleasure of the ride out ? why is it so important that an animal die at the end of it? i'm yet to hear this argument in this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"and note wyrdsis and Sexpot and Kinky you wont be geting any hate mail from me at all lol. i got nothing but respect for you guys and your open points of _iew. its good for us all to see two sides of something. your still lovely pink humans to me lol x It is kinky here, and you are right, a good debate with both points of _iew is excellent fun. Nobody says we have to agree, it would be a boring debate if we did lol " exactly i have really enjoyed it. but just cos we have different point of _iews dont make me judge the person. i respect people that have different opinions ands thats how it should be. to many people get shitting cos someone dont agree with them lol x i would take you all to the pub so we could get pissed over it lol x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't be bothered to read 130+ posts so this might have been said somewhere else and if it has I apologise but the biggest blood sport in this country is of course fishing - but then the 'common' man is fully committed to this past time so it always falls under the radar. (puts hard hat on and goes and hides under the table)" hey get out from under there and face this god dam music lol. sexpot put that cd back on again will ya lol x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You have almost proven the point that is is because they are seen as a cute furry animal that people get emotional about it lol. For me it has reason and method. I enjoy hunting on a social level and if it results in getting rid of another fox, all the better....if there is no kill, then the ride out is always a pleasure. if it's not about the kill...why are you all opposed to it being illegal? why not stick to scent hunts...if it is purely for the pleasure of the ride out ? why is it so important that an animal die at the end of it? i'm yet to hear this argument in this thread" The ride out and the thrill of the hunt/chase is great fun, and chasing it to its end ( the fox demise) just heightens the excitement. I love the hunt and each tine hope we find one of them. I have no love of foxes and have no qualms with killing them either with dogs or gun. So a hunt with scent is not a hunt it is a hack. It is a bonus if there is a kill on the hunt. Personally I would love it if we got one on every hunt, sadly it doesn't happen. This does not mean the hunt has not been a pleasure on the social side. Bloody vermin! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"as a little girl living in the countryside had friends who owned farms and spent most of my summer holidays with them. I understand animals die and I understand we eat them animals, but at 9 or 10 me and a friend walked down the canal bank and found a fox in a trap dying being eaten alive and there was no reason to have done it. we saw foxes often they feared humans and almost always would run away not like (so what I have heard) the foxes in london etc. there is just no need to hunt down animals to kill for what the fun of (lets say) upper class toffs who think that this game of dead or alive is right. I just can not even think about it, I have known farmers shooting foxes when there has been a large killing of hens etc which still boggles me but he is not doing it for sport he is doing it for his livelihood." Upper class toffs?!?!?. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You have almost proven the point that is is because they are seen as a cute furry animal that people get emotional about it lol. For me it has reason and method. I enjoy hunting on a social level and if it results in getting rid of another fox, all the better....if there is no kill, then the ride out is always a pleasure. if it's not about the kill...why are you all opposed to it being illegal? why not stick to scent hunts...if it is purely for the pleasure of the ride out ? why is it so important that an animal die at the end of it? i'm yet to hear this argument in this thread The ride out and the thrill of the hunt/chase is great fun, and chasing it to its end ( the fox demise) just heightens the excitement. I love the hunt and each tine hope we find one of them. I have no love of foxes and have no qualms with killing them either with dogs or gun. So a hunt with scent is not a hunt it is a hack. It is a bonus if there is a kill on the hunt. Personally I would love it if we got one on every hunt, sadly it doesn't happen. This does not mean the hunt has not been a pleasure on the social side. Bloody vermin!" which is what differentiates it between a sport and a blood sport and why it should remain unlawful. too many people have made the comment that it is to keep the numbers down...the reality is, it's the brutality that excites you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It is a bonus if there is a kill on the hunt. Personally I would love it if we got one on every hunt, sadly it doesn't happen. This does not mean the hunt has not been a pleasure on the social side. Bloody vermin!" Perhaps you should get you and your hunt down to Number 10, I hear they have a vermin problem. Hell so long as you get a few rats to kill should be a thrill! (rats are harder to catch than foxes!) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"and note wyrdsis and Sexpot and Kinky you wont be geting any hate mail from me at all lol. i got nothing but respect for you guys and your open points of _iew. its good for us all to see two sides of something. your still lovely pink humans to me lol x It is kinky here, and you are right, a good debate with both points of _iew is excellent fun. Nobody says we have to agree, it would be a boring debate if we did lol exactly i have really enjoyed it. but just cos we have different point of _iews dont make me judge the person. i respect people that have different opinions ands thats how it should be. to many people get shitting cos someone dont agree with them lol x i would take you all to the pub so we could get pissed over it lol x" Youll regret saying that lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I also feel sorry for all the people who lost their jobs when hunting was banned. No thought for their living either?" I need to ask, exactly what jobs where lost? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You have almost proven the point that is is because they are seen as a cute furry animal that people get emotional about it lol. For me it has reason and method. I enjoy hunting on a social level and if it results in getting rid of another fox, all the better....if there is no kill, then the ride out is always a pleasure. if it's not about the kill...why are you all opposed to it being illegal? why not stick to scent hunts...if it is purely for the pleasure of the ride out ? why is it so important that an animal die at the end of it? i'm yet to hear this argument in this thread The ride out and the thrill of the hunt/chase is great fun, and chasing it to its end ( the fox demise) just heightens the excitement. I love the hunt and each tine hope we find one of them. I have no love of foxes and have no qualms with killing them either with dogs or gun. So a hunt with scent is not a hunt it is a hack. It is a bonus if there is a kill on the hunt. Personally I would love it if we got one on every hunt, sadly it doesn't happen. This does not mean the hunt has not been a pleasure on the social side. Bloody vermin! which is what differentiates it between a sport and a blood sport and why it should remain unlawful. too many people have made the comment that it is to keep the numbers down...the reality is, it's the brutality that excites you" Have you read all the threads? I have and I dont believe keeping the numbers down has been an arguement through the thread, but that fact they are vermin. I enjoy it all, the social side, the ride and yes the thrill of the kill. Not ever hunt results in a kill and as I have said it is a bonus to me as it is another one gone. The brutality?....alot quicker and not as cruel as traps/poison or shooting ( for those who are not a crack shot) which is acceptable on other vermin. But then because you dont chase them and it is not classed as a sport it is ok to do that to an animal isnt it?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Have you read all the threads? I have and I dont believe keeping the numbers down has been an arguement through the thread, but that fact they are vermin. I enjoy it all, the social side, the ride and yes the thrill of the kill. Not ever hunt results in a kill and as I have said it is a bonus to me as it is another one gone. The brutality?....alot quicker and not as cruel as traps/poison or shooting ( for those who are not a crack shot) which is acceptable on other vermin. But then because you dont chase them and it is not classed as a sport it is ok to do that to an animal isnt it?!" So just to clarify, you say you do it for the social side and the thrill of the chase/hunt, but drag hunting doesn't have the same thrill? Just because it is vermin [to some] isn't really an excuse in my book, why foxes and not rabbits/hares (and other fluffy cute things) which do more commercial damage than foxes? Hell I know someone who used to hunt with hounds and now does drag hunting that has quite a few cats. Point been I also know quite a few people who call cats vermin and wouldn't mind getting a pack of dogs to chase them down and rip them to bits. I doubt that would get the same vocal backing as it is not a "social tradition", but all traditions start and end somewhere. *shrugs* Larry Niven - Bordered In Black... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"and note wyrdsis and Sexpot and Kinky you wont be geting any hate mail from me at all lol. i got nothing but respect for you guys and your open points of _iew. its good for us all to see two sides of something. your still lovely pink humans to me lol x It is kinky here, and you are right, a good debate with both points of _iew is excellent fun. Nobody says we have to agree, it would be a boring debate if we did lol exactly i have really enjoyed it. but just cos we have different point of _iews dont make me judge the person. i respect people that have different opinions ands thats how it should be. to many people get shitting cos someone dont agree with them lol x i would take you all to the pub so we could get pissed over it lol x Youll regret saying that lol " i wont i love a good piss up lol x plus i can try it on with these ladies lol x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"........... Urban foxes are so because they are unable to live in their natural habitat, because we...humans decide we want all the land the foxes lived on... So in order to live and survive...they must go hunting.. .............. " That doesn't seem to be the case in Glasgow. The foxes around here find the garbage abandoned by unthinking individuals and supermarkets an easier feed than having to chase and kill in the countryside. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Have you read all the threads? I have and I dont believe keeping the numbers down has been an arguement through the thread, but that fact they are vermin. I enjoy it all, the social side, the ride and yes the thrill of the kill. Not ever hunt results in a kill and as I have said it is a bonus to me as it is another one gone. The brutality?....alot quicker and not as cruel as traps/poison or shooting ( for those who are not a crack shot) which is acceptable on other vermin. But then because you dont chase them and it is not classed as a sport it is ok to do that to an animal isnt it?! So just to clarify, you say you do it for the social side and the thrill of the chase/hunt, but drag hunting doesn't have the same thrill? Just because it is vermin [to some] isn't really an excuse in my book, why foxes and not rabbits/hares (and other fluffy cute things) which do more commercial damage than foxes? Hell I know someone who used to hunt with hounds and now does drag hunting that has quite a few cats. Point been I also know quite a few people who call cats vermin and wouldn't mind getting a pack of dogs to chase them down and rip them to bits. I doubt that would get the same vocal backing as it is not a "social tradition", but all traditions start and end somewhere. *shrugs* Larry Niven - Bordered In Black... " And again.....Yes I do enjoy the kill and it is not a hunt if you are not chasing an animal but following a scent....it is a ride out with your dogs! Bit like the different between fucking a woman and a fleshlight.....one is infinitely more exciting than the other!...and yes I asm aware that no animals are harmed in that scenario..just a bit of humour lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"and note wyrdsis and Sexpot and Kinky you wont be geting any hate mail from me at all lol. i got nothing but respect for you guys and your open points of _iew. its good for us all to see two sides of something. your still lovely pink humans to me lol x It is kinky here, and you are right, a good debate with both points of _iew is excellent fun. Nobody says we have to agree, it would be a boring debate if we did lol exactly i have really enjoyed it. but just cos we have different point of _iews dont make me judge the person. i respect people that have different opinions ands thats how it should be. to many people get shitting cos someone dont agree with them lol x i would take you all to the pub so we could get pissed over it lol x Youll regret saying that lol i wont i love a good piss up lol x plus i can try it on with these ladies lol x" Haha and we can all debate the ethics of Fox hunting while you try n get ya end away yur all heart you hahah | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Have you read all the threads? I have and I dont believe keeping the numbers down has been an arguement through the thread, but that fact they are vermin. I enjoy it all, the social side, the ride and yes the thrill of the kill. Not ever hunt results in a kill and as I have said it is a bonus to me as it is another one gone. The brutality?....alot quicker and not as cruel as traps/poison or shooting ( for those who are not a crack shot) which is acceptable on other vermin. But then because you dont chase them and it is not classed as a sport it is ok to do that to an animal isnt it?!" which brings me back to my original question, if it is not JUST the kill that excites you, why do you have to kill? why is it a big issue for hunts to have a kill at the end of it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" And again.....Yes I do enjoy the kill and it is not a hunt if you are not chasing an animal but following a scent....it is a ride out with your dogs! Bit like the different between fucking a woman and a fleshlight.....one is infinitely more exciting than the other!...and yes I asm aware that no animals are harmed in that scenario..just a bit of humour lol" so it's the thrill of hunting *something* I guess. Hmmm well each to their own, but doesn't make me feel any more optimistic for the human species. (It's similar to why rich and powerful people fuck over over people, the power of holding someones future/live in their hands and the thrill of it. I have had this said to me first hand btw). As for fleshlight and no animals involved, this may make you laugh: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK9ydu3qUGk | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i think there was an expectations that it would be overturned with the new brokeback coalition...i also think they're biding their time, but it will happen. i'm against anything having to die under the auspices of entertainment. no different to dog fighting or cock fights....which are both illegal and never set to return. only difference is it keeps the gentry amused" anti hunting and anti comments like this "the new brokeback coalition" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nobody will shoot you down for asking a question or having an opinion...or I would hope not. I have just pasted the definition of vermin as it says it all really. Foxes are classed as vermin because they come under the definition as such lol ver·min (vûrmn) n. pl. vermin 1. Various small animals or insects, such as rats or cockroaches, that are destructive, annoying, or injurious to health. 2. Animals that prey on game, such as foxes or weasels. As a person with livestock and having preventative methods to try and deter, they are still a pest. They do not just kill one to eat but will kill a whole batch and then take one away." Well another _iew is .... I went and googled etc "vermin" and if foxes came under the heading of and no they dont. Its the _iew of the "hunting fraternity" that labled them so. Re urban foxes... We have here by me and not once has anyone complained about their habits. Im not suprised they are here. Their own habitat has been used for factories and housing. But we have no mice problems...Only cat problems with them breeding like buggery. So maybe the hunt can get rid of them. It will save me garden bieng crapped in | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ver·min (vûrmn) *Obnoxious, objectionable, or disgusting animals collectively, especially those that appear commonly and are difficult to control. *Various animals that are destructive, annoying, or injurious to health. *animals that prey upon game. " People? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ver·min (vûrmn) *Obnoxious, objectionable, or disgusting animals collectively, especially those that appear commonly and are difficult to control. *Various animals that are destructive, annoying, or injurious to health. *animals that prey upon game. People? " lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ver·min (vûrmn) *Obnoxious, objectionable, or disgusting animals collectively, especially those that appear commonly and are difficult to control. *Various animals that are destructive, annoying, or injurious to health. *animals that prey upon game. People? lol" Actually we are a virus according to Agent Smith ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Na9-jV_OJI | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nobody will shoot you down for asking a question or having an opinion...or I would hope not. I have just pasted the definition of vermin as it says it all really. Foxes are classed as vermin because they come under the definition as such lol ver·min (vûrmn) n. pl. vermin 1. Various small animals or insects, such as rats or cockroaches, that are destructive, annoying, or injurious to health. 2. Animals that prey on game, such as foxes or weasels. As a person with livestock and having preventative methods to try and deter, they are still a pest. They do not just kill one to eat but will kill a whole batch and then take one away. Well another _iew is .... I went and googled etc "vermin" and if foxes came under the heading of and no they dont. Its the _iew of the "hunting fraternity" that labled them so. Re urban foxes... We have here by me and not once has anyone complained about their habits. Im not suprised they are here. Their own habitat has been used for factories and housing. But we have no mice problems...Only cat problems with them breeding like buggery. So maybe the hunt can get rid of them. It will save me garden bieng crapped in " ummm...I think the definition did have foxes as vermin...I posted it! lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... ummm...I think the definition did have foxes as vermin...I posted it! lol" Depends on whose definition you are using. Rabbits cute and fluffy (*awww*), vermin in Australia (*stomp stomp stomp*)... etc Anyhow read Bordered in Black short story by Larry Niven (N-Space collection)... really do, it was almost a cathartic moment for me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... ummm...I think the definition did have foxes as vermin...I posted it! lol Depends on whose definition you are using. Rabbits cute and fluffy (*awww*), vermin in Australia (*stomp stomp stomp*)... etc Anyhow read Bordered in Black short story by Larry Niven (N-Space collection)... really do, it was almost a cathartic moment for me!" I shoot rabbits aswell- they're vile when wild | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... ummm...I think the definition did have foxes as vermin...I posted it! lol Depends on whose definition you are using. Rabbits cute and fluffy (*awww*), vermin in Australia (*stomp stomp stomp*)... etc Anyhow read Bordered in Black short story by Larry Niven (N-Space collection)... really do, it was almost a cathartic moment for me! I shoot rabbits aswell- they're vile when wild" Stop shooting at them.....you are making them wild! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... ummm...I think the definition did have foxes as vermin...I posted it! lol Depends on whose definition you are using. Rabbits cute and fluffy (*awww*), vermin in Australia (*stomp stomp stomp*)... etc Anyhow read Bordered in Black short story by Larry Niven (N-Space collection)... really do, it was almost a cathartic moment for me! I shoot rabbits aswell- they're vile when wild" They might have that desease... "mixeshistoesup" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... ummm...I think the definition did have foxes as vermin...I posted it! lol Depends on whose definition you are using. Rabbits cute and fluffy (*awww*), vermin in Australia (*stomp stomp stomp*)... etc Anyhow read Bordered in Black short story by Larry Niven (N-Space collection)... really do, it was almost a cathartic moment for me! I shoot rabbits aswell- they're vile when wild Stop shooting at them.....you are making them wild! " Tough monkeys! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"http://www.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/14562 Only these links allowed please x" Damn...no dictionary definitions allowed????? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nobody will shoot you down for asking a question or having an opinion...or I would hope not. I have just pasted the definition of vermin as it says it all really. Foxes are classed as vermin because they come under the definition as such lol ver·min (vûrmn) n. pl. vermin 1. Various small animals or insects, such as rats or cockroaches, that are destructive, annoying, or injurious to health. 2. Animals that prey on game, such as foxes or weasels. As a person with livestock and having preventative methods to try and deter, they are still a pest. They do not just kill one to eat but will kill a whole batch and then take one away. Well another _iew is .... I went and googled etc "vermin" and if foxes came under the heading of and no they dont. Its the _iew of the "hunting fraternity" that labled them so. Re urban foxes... We have here by me and not once has anyone complained about their habits. Im not suprised they are here. Their own habitat has been used for factories and housing. But we have no mice problems...Only cat problems with them breeding like buggery. So maybe the hunt can get rid of them. It will save me garden bieng crapped in ummm...I think the definition did have foxes as vermin...I posted it! lol" Im not saying i disbelive you.. But that the term "vermin" is simply used by the people who try and justify the fact that they kill them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That's what i love about the human race If something annoys us or damages our things or invades our space IE vermin and insects (as we fondly refer ta other life forms) We automatically think we have the right to kill And yes im putting myself in that equation too before anyone thinks differently It just saddens me that we think we are better than anything else Here's hoping that one day a far superior race from a distant galaxy doesn't _iew us with the same attitude and dislike xx " I have no qualms- am headin to hell anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pro. 1. Foxes are not cute and cuddly, they're nasty, vicious indiscriminate killers, known to attack and kill humans, livestock and domestic pets. 2. Many rural dwellers lost their livelihoods because of the ban - the kennels, the stables for the "rented" horses, local trade on hunt days etc etc. 3. Tens of thousands of animals, including foxes, are killed in the UK by cars on non-essential journeys, ie for "fun". The animal does not know the distinction between being killed by people on horseback for fun, or by people in cars for fun." Sorry am I being thick? your 1 and 2 are total contradictions? and how may humans have been killed by foxes...come on!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hunting ? Just been watching steve wright and was somewhat amazed that the "big fight" was still raging. I know that there are now laws re dogs etc but didnt know to what extent the anti hunt were still fighting. Oh and im "anti hunt" by the way.. " Do you mean fox hunting or just hunting in general as there are some people in certain parts of the world who still need to hunt their food - there's a distinct lack of supermarkets in some parts! The local hunt to us where I was brought up never managed to actually get any foxes - occasionally had a bit of a sniff but they were just too wily for them! The hunt participants weren't all toffs, they were a mix of farmers, local people who liked to have a ride then get pissed! The hunt sabatours were lunatics - rent a mob who didn't know why they were there - they just wanted a fight! So. I'm neither for or against fox hunting as it's banned anyway! Z | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know nothing about the subject so I won't comment. " I wouldn't let a small matter like that stop you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anti - but not against Hunting or Fishing for " FOOD " But - Chasing a "Hungry" small animal seems pointless !! - its only the rich with horses and fook all else to do but chase an animal until it gives up !!! smear the animals blood on their face and go home or proudly to the pub and pretend what a nice person you are.... if your going to chase a fox - Hunt it or RUN - after it you lazy fat fookers x" You cant paint everyone with the same brush, im not rich fat or lazy so pick your words more carefuly, thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pro. Ever seen a hen house after a fox has been through it. And a) its not just toffs b) even if so, why shouldnt toffs enjoy themselves too?" Oh and i aint on about you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Have you read all the threads? I have and I dont believe keeping the numbers down has been an arguement through the thread, but that fact they are vermin. I enjoy it all, the social side, the ride and yes the thrill of the kill. Not ever hunt results in a kill and as I have said it is a bonus to me as it is another one gone. The brutality?....alot quicker and not as cruel as traps/poison or shooting ( for those who are not a crack shot) which is acceptable on other vermin. But then because you dont chase them and it is not classed as a sport it is ok to do that to an animal isnt it?! which brings me back to my original question, if it is not JUST the kill that excites you, why do you have to kill? why is it a big issue for hunts to have a kill at the end of it? " the whole point is to keep the numbers down , if you look into the fox issue you can see they are getting bigger bolder and more of a danger if you look http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343464/Biggest-Ever-fox-caught-Britain-4ft-cat-killer-trapped-vet.html wud you want your child anywhere near a wild animal who has already been shown to bite humans already .. checked list of links its a main newspaper so is on the list ~:P | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd really love to know how many anti fox hunting people have actually been to one, met the people in them and know anything about it! I don't agree with cruelty in any way shape or form to either human or animal but you need to know what you're talking about before sweeping - and often incorrect - comments are made. Z" I don't think you technically need to have first hand experience of everything in order to form an opinion on it - there is plenty of information both for and against most emotive issues for people to make balanced judgements. I've never visited a country that is ruled by a ruthless dictator for example but having read and seen information I think I can safely form an opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"so who will be going hunting this summer " No one as the season doesn't start there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd really love to know how many anti fox hunting people have actually been to one, met the people in them and know anything about it! I don't agree with cruelty in any way shape or form to either human or animal but you need to know what you're talking about before sweeping - and often incorrect - comments are made. Z I don't think you technically need to have first hand experience of everything in order to form an opinion on it - there is plenty of information both for and against most emotive issues for people to make balanced judgements. I've never visited a country that is ruled by a ruthless dictator for example but having read and seen information I think I can safely form an opinion." Exactly. Never been to mt everest but know its high... Never been to death valley but know it hot ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |