FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Junior doctor strike.
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People get ill at weekends and in the evenings lol" And they work in the evenings and weekends. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People get ill at weekends and in the evenings lol" Yes, they do. The time I was in hospital, I was sent on a Friday afternoon and was there until Monday afternoon. They still had the necessary care teams there. They had surgical staff on call too and all urgent services and surgeries still happened as they do today. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Get back to work and be grateful you have the opportunity of a career " They just want to be treated correctly.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. " If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Totally behind the doctors but not sure why they are going down this route. All they have to do is say (en masse) "we're not signing a new contract as of which ever day it starts." Over to you Mr Hunt, your problem. Game over." Because it will he enforced signed or not. This literally is their last option and it wouldn't be taken lightly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them " No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Totally behind the doctors but not sure why they are going down this route. All they have to do is say (en masse) "we're not signing a new contract as of which ever day it starts." Over to you Mr Hunt, your problem. Game over." Not really, he is imposing it unilaterally.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Because it will he enforced signed or not. This literally is their last option and it wouldn't be taken lightly" If they all in effect resign on the 1st August or whatever the start date is. What exactly is Hunt going to do? Send in the army? It will then be down to him. You can try to impose a new contract; no one has to accept it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. " Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Because it will he enforced signed or not. This literally is their last option and it wouldn't be taken lightly If they all in effect resign on the 1st August or whatever the start date is. What exactly is Hunt going to do? Send in the army? It will then be down to him. You can try to impose a new contract; no one has to accept it." He does not seem to grasp that..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. " So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hunt seems to be doing his best on inflame the situation. It's almost as if the NHS is being run down so that choice bits can be outsourced " Funny that....but of course it's the greedy doctors that are wrong! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They are going on strike over the new contract being imposed by the health secretary jeremey hunt. It starts tomorrow 8am and goes on until 5pm the same day. Then it resumes 8am on wednesday and finishes 5pm that day. What do you think of them going on strike? I think it is good cos they need a good contract, although it is not fair on the patients as they are running a limit service." Medicine is a very well paid profession with many privileges . In any career you expect to work long hours in you first few years . Why should the tax payers pay Doctors premium rates for working Saturdays . This is just arrogance and greed. It has nothing to do with Doctors being concerned about patient care . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hunt seems to be doing his best on inflame the situation. It's almost as if the NHS is being run down so that choice bits can be outsourced " Exactly, to their Tory mates of course. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands " Your support of the strike doesn't negate my sympathy for those who suffer as a result. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They are going on strike over the new contract being imposed by the health secretary jeremey hunt. It starts tomorrow 8am and goes on until 5pm the same day. Then it resumes 8am on wednesday and finishes 5pm that day. What do you think of them going on strike? I think it is good cos they need a good contract, although it is not fair on the patients as they are running a limit service. Medicine is a very well paid profession with many privileges . In any career you expect to work long hours in you first few years . Why should the tax payers pay Doctors premium rates for working Saturdays . This is just arrogance and greed. It has nothing to do with Doctors being concerned about patient care ." Privileges? ? Such as? Working 48 hour shifts. Working every Christmas and not seeing your kids? Being exhausted to the point of tears but still being in charge of someone's life.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else" Hmmm....designing cathedrals or writing violin concertos? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands Your support of the strike doesn't negate my sympathy for those who suffer as a result. " As I said above I sympathise too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They are going on strike over the new contract being imposed by the health secretary jeremey hunt. It starts tomorrow 8am and goes on until 5pm the same day. Then it resumes 8am on wednesday and finishes 5pm that day. What do you think of them going on strike? I think it is good cos they need a good contract, although it is not fair on the patients as they are running a limit service." The Government hasn't handle it well, I think (hope) they've research it well but it looks like they did their research on the back of a fag packet which smacks of shoddy standards. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands Your support of the strike doesn't negate my sympathy for those who suffer as a result. As I said above I sympathise too. " You dismissed it as "not an emergency". I wouldn't say that's sympathetic, I'd say that's supporting the strike knowing (and caring very little that) its at the cost of patients. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It has nothing to do with Doctors being concerned about patient care ." Doctors (and other medical staff) are quite simply at breaking point. Why do you think lorry drivers and airline pilots etc have legally limited hours of work and rest breaks? Do you think a starting salary of £22,500 is greed for the training, resposibility and hours? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands Your support of the strike doesn't negate my sympathy for those who suffer as a result. As I said above I sympathise too. You dismissed it as "not an emergency". I wouldn't say that's sympathetic, I'd say that's supporting the strike knowing (and caring very little that) its at the cost of patients." Not at all. I certainly didn't mean it to sound that way. It's extremely unfortunate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else" Oh yes, doing what exactly....?? We need them as doctors.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! " But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else " Ridiculous comment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it." OK, maybe we just accept that we can't afford a seven day week health service, emergencies excepted.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else" That's the problem they certainly can including working overseas or easily transferring their skills into another field with less grief, hassle and hours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it. OK, maybe we just accept that we can't afford a seven day week health service, emergencies excepted...." That's the problem though. Hunt won't. He wants a 7 day service without giving anymore resources meaning the ones already in place are stretched further. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it. OK, maybe we just accept that we can't afford a seven day week health service, emergencies excepted...." How come it costs extra to schedule a doctor to work at the weekend? It's not antisocial for retail, or businesses with clients in the UAE for example. Perhaps wasting money in areas like that should be revised. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it. OK, maybe we just accept that we can't afford a seven day week health service, emergencies excepted.... That's the problem though. Hunt won't. He wants a 7 day service without giving anymore resources meaning the ones already in place are stretched further. " We just have to accept we, as a country, just can't afford it... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it. OK, maybe we just accept that we can't afford a seven day week health service, emergencies excepted.... How come it costs extra to schedule a doctor to work at the weekend? It's not antisocial for retail, or businesses with clients in the UAE for example. Perhaps wasting money in areas like that should be revised. " Because there has always been unsocial hours pay. Bottom line is it's not the pay that's the issue. It's the conditions. Not quite sure what your chip with me is but carry on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else" If you can't see the problem with all our doctors leaving to do something else that rather nullifies anything else you say? How do you propose to run an NHS without doctors? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it. OK, maybe we just accept that we can't afford a seven day week health service, emergencies excepted.... How come it costs extra to schedule a doctor to work at the weekend? It's not antisocial for retail, or businesses with clients in the UAE for example. Perhaps wasting money in areas like that should be revised. Because there has always been unsocial hours pay. Bottom line is it's not the pay that's the issue. It's the conditions. Not quite sure what your chip with me is but carry on. " I wasn't replying to you, you're aware that you keep replying to me? Also "that's the way it's always been" isn't a good reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it." I think you've taken my comment about simply needing more doctors a bit too literally...or perhaps it was poor phrasing on my part, for which I apologise. I'm ex NHS so I know exactly what's requi_ed for 7-day working but the thread was about whether we support the 'doctors' in their strike action. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this is the only way that they can get their point across then I am behind them. I am sure this decision won't have been taken lightly. I agree that we need to bring the weekend staffing levels up to what they are during the week but this proposed contract is not the answer...we simply need more doctors! But in order to get the same service at weekends you need more nurses/nursing assistants/lab workers/radiologists/secretaries/receptionists etc. Getting doctors to work more at weekends isn't going to solve it. I think you've taken my comment about simply needing more doctors a bit too literally...or perhaps it was poor phrasing on my part, for which I apologise. I'm ex NHS so I know exactly what's requi_ed for 7-day working but the thread was about whether we support the 'doctors' in their strike action." Possibly me misreading. I may have not quoted the right thing! Sorry. But yeah there are sadly lots of people, and unfortunately people in charge that think it's simply just getting doctors to work more hours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In case anyone has failed to notice we already have a 7 day service. Anyone ever heard of someone being turned away from hospital after a car crash on a Saturday? 'Sorry mate we're closed until Monday?' Hunt is talking through his backside. Perhaps we can 7 day a week access to our politicians who we pay for? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In case anyone has failed to notice we already have a 7 day service. Anyone ever heard of someone being turned away from hospital after a car crash on a Saturday? 'Sorry mate we're closed until Monday?' Hunt is talking through his backside. Perhaps we can 7 day a week access to our politicians who we pay for? " That's 7 day emergency care, not a full 7 day NHS service. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In case anyone has failed to notice we already have a 7 day service. Anyone ever heard of someone being turned away from hospital after a car crash on a Saturday? 'Sorry mate we're closed until Monday?' Hunt is talking through his backside. Perhaps we can 7 day a week access to our politicians who we pay for? That's 7 day emergency care, not a full 7 day NHS service. " So they kick out all the recuperating knee and hip operations on a Friday evening a 5.00 p.m.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In case anyone has failed to notice we already have a 7 day service. Anyone ever heard of someone being turned away from hospital after a car crash on a Saturday? 'Sorry mate we're closed until Monday?' Hunt is talking through his backside. Perhaps we can 7 day a week access to our politicians who we pay for? That's 7 day emergency care, not a full 7 day NHS service. So they kick out all the recuperating knee and hip operations on a Friday evening a 5.00 p.m.?" When have you ever had an elective surgery scheduled for a Sunday, or seen your GP with a normal appointment on a Sunday? That would make it a 7 day NHS. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone explain to me the basics of the dispute please? I have watched it debated on Question Time and followed the news but I am still confused. Is it about 1. Pay on a Saturday 2. Being forced to work on a Saturday 3. General pay 4. Specific pay terms 5. Overall working hours 6. Some of the above 7. None of the above 8. Some of the above and other things I am confused." Awww, go on someone, please help me out on this? I really can't whinge or cheer without knowing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think with the way the government and the media are trying to turn this into a witch hunt, it would be very easy to dismiss this as greed and arrogance on the part of junior doctors. "It's normal to work overtime when you're starting out in your career." Etc. Difference is, if I work overtime and lose a bit of concentration, a line of data might get ente_ed wrong and someone gets over or underpaid. A junior doctor works overtime, loses concentration (because they're overworked, under supported, not to mention mentally and physically exhausted), and people die. The potential risk in my job is that my company might lose a bit of money. So I am remunerated accordingly. For a junior doctor, the potential risks are death, lifelong injury, or extreme trauma. So yes, they SHOULD get paid according to the potential risks of the decisions they have to make. Please do some real research on what the current plans will mean for junior doctors rotas, hours worked, etc, before dismissing it as 'greedy overpaid doctors' There are not enough junior doctors in emergency medicine as it is, (possibly illegally) imposing a contract which means unfair and unsafe working hours, with little to no consequence for the hospital trust for forcing junior doctors to work more than reasonable hours, is only going to put pressure on an already overworked staff and demoralised staff. Please also remember that the BMA and the Royal colleges, as well as a cross party group of MPs, have approached Mr Hunt with at least 2 possible solutions to the problem, and Mr Hunt has refused to return to the negotiating table. Apart from anything else, having extra doctors on wards will mean nothing if there aren't the additional auxiliary staff also present. A Junior Doctor can prescribe painkillers but, if the dispensing pharmacist isn't present, the drugs can't be dispensed. Likewise a diagnostic X-Ray can't be completed without a radiographer present. The Junior Doctor contract will not result in 'a truly 7 day NHS'...we already have a 7 day NHS. It's just that sometimes, if you're not immediately in need, you have to wait until you can be treated. The NHS provides some of the best emergency medical care IN THE WORLD. It is also the absolute best service of its kind in the world. Its staff are there when they are needed, day in and day out. All of this, and it is free at the point of service! Take a moment to think about what we have, and the consequences for us if we lose that. Throughout the contract negotiations, Jeremy Hunt has consistently been discove_ed to be manipulating the truth or, in actual fact, outright lying. Contrast that with individuals who have dedicated at least 7 years of their lives to learning how to care for people, how to fix us when we are broken. Personally, I know in whom I'd rather put my faith. " Brilliantly explained!!! Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment " Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think with the way the government and the media are trying to turn this into a witch hunt, it would be very easy to dismiss this as greed and arrogance on the part of junior doctors. "It's normal to work overtime when you're starting out in your career." Etc. Difference is, if I work overtime and lose a bit of concentration, a line of data might get ente_ed wrong and someone gets over or underpaid. A junior doctor works overtime, loses concentration (because they're overworked, under supported, not to mention mentally and physically exhausted), and people die. The potential risk in my job is that my company might lose a bit of money. So I am remunerated accordingly. For a junior doctor, the potential risks are death, lifelong injury, or extreme trauma. So yes, they SHOULD get paid according to the potential risks of the decisions they have to make. Please do some real research on what the current plans will mean for junior doctors rotas, hours worked, etc, before dismissing it as 'greedy overpaid doctors' There are not enough junior doctors in emergency medicine as it is, (possibly illegally) imposing a contract which means unfair and unsafe working hours, with little to no consequence for the hospital trust for forcing junior doctors to work more than reasonable hours, is only going to put pressure on an already overworked staff and demoralised staff. Please also remember that the BMA and the Royal colleges, as well as a cross party group of MPs, have approached Mr Hunt with at least 2 possible solutions to the problem, and Mr Hunt has refused to return to the negotiating table. Apart from anything else, having extra doctors on wards will mean nothing if there aren't the additional auxiliary staff also present. A Junior Doctor can prescribe painkillers but, if the dispensing pharmacist isn't present, the drugs can't be dispensed. Likewise a diagnostic X-Ray can't be completed without a radiographer present. The Junior Doctor contract will not result in 'a truly 7 day NHS'...we already have a 7 day NHS. It's just that sometimes, if you're not immediately in need, you have to wait until you can be treated. The NHS provides some of the best emergency medical care IN THE WORLD. It is also the absolute best service of its kind in the world. Its staff are there when they are needed, day in and day out. All of this, and it is free at the point of service! Take a moment to think about what we have, and the consequences for us if we lose that. Throughout the contract negotiations, Jeremy Hunt has consistently been discove_ed to be manipulating the truth or, in actual fact, outright lying. Contrast that with individuals who have dedicated at least 7 years of their lives to learning how to care for people, how to fix us when we are broken. Personally, I know in whom I'd rather put my faith. " Brilliantly explained!!! Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone explain to me the basics of the dispute please? I have watched it debated on Question Time and followed the news but I am still confused. Is it about 1. Pay on a Saturday 2. Being forced to work on a Saturday 3. General pay 4. Specific pay terms 5. Overall working hours 6. Some of the above 7. None of the above 8. Some of the above and other things I am confused." Short answer is No.8 There are lots of things wrong with the contract but, for the most part, the contract means that junior doctors will mainly be paid less for doing the same amount of, if not more, work. The consequences for hospital trusts (employers) are not particularly dire if they decide to force their JDs to work more than reasonable hours, meaning that there's no reason for them to not do so. It's a really big, complex issue that is being oversimplified by the media and the government to try to negate the public sympathy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone explain to me the basics of the dispute please? I have watched it debated on Question Time and followed the news but I am still confused. Is it about 1. Pay on a Saturday 2. Being forced to work on a Saturday 3. General pay 4. Specific pay terms 5. Overall working hours 6. Some of the above 7. None of the above 8. Some of the above and other things I am confused. Awww, go on someone, please help me out on this? I really can't whinge or cheer without knowing." It's all so massively inconsistent. Each person interviewed in favour of the strike has a different problem. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long." Because there's not enough doctors...part of the strike reasons... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long." so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else If you can't see the problem with all our doctors leaving to do something else that rather nullifies anything else you say? How do you propose to run an NHS without doctors?" there wont be any need to run it without them because when it comes to it they will see they do pretty well compa_ed to many others | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When have you ever had an elective surgery scheduled for a Sunday, or seen your GP with a normal appointment on a Sunday? That would make it a 7 day NHS. " The NHS operates 24 hours a day 7 days a week, if you wish to have GP appointments at 10.00 p.m. on a Sunday that's fine. But you have to resouce it not spread it thinner. In that scenario you need more doctors, receptionists, diagnostic services, nurse, caretakers etc etc. If society wishes to fund that well fine. The problem is that there are no more doctors etc. or resources to fund them One third of GPs are planning to take early retirement in the next 5 years because they have had enough. This is all about destabilising the NHS to bring about privatisation. And guess where that will lead? You want to try getting an NHS dentist round Carmarthenshire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"if u don't like your contract of employ show some balls and fuck off abroad.....there are plenty of doctors without placements, if not we will get some more from abroad who at least know what a days work is....all for 43k per year plus xtra payments ....not a bad screw" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"if u don't like your contract of employ show some balls and fuck off abroad.....there are plenty of doctors without placements, if not we will get some more from abroad who at least know what a days work is....all for 43k per year plus xtra payments ....not a bad screw" Where pray tell are all these doctors hiding? Is this why we recruit from abroad because they're all hiding away?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long." Doctors are walking out in unprecedented numbers - to Australia, Canada, the US, to private providers. As taxpayers we have all made huge contributions to their training, I'd hope that most people would prefer to keep them by paying them competitively and, more importantly, allowing the proper conditions to do the job properly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"there are plenty of doctors without placements," Really? Can we see your reference for that. Meanwhile if it's such a great job just get yourself 3 A* 'A' levels, study for 6 years and get yourself a 'cushy little number' Better still have no qualifications and become an MP for a lot more money and half the hours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest?" cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone explain to me the basics of the dispute please? I have watched it debated on Question Time and followed the news but I am still confused. Is it about 1. Pay on a Saturday 2. Being forced to work on a Saturday 3. General pay 4. Specific pay terms 5. Overall working hours 6. Some of the above 7. None of the above 8. Some of the above and other things I am confused. Short answer is No.8 There are lots of things wrong with the contract but, for the most part, the contract means that junior doctors will mainly be paid less for doing the same amount of, if not more, work. The consequences for hospital trusts (employers) are not particularly dire if they decide to force their JDs to work more than reasonable hours, meaning that there's no reason for them to not do so. It's a really big, complex issue that is being oversimplified by the media and the government to try to negate the public sympathy. " Thanks! I knew it wasn't as simple as many portray. I am still none the wiser though. (Everyone else on this post seems to have a clear opinion though, so it may just be me being stoopid). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When have you ever had an elective surgery scheduled for a Sunday, or seen your GP with a normal appointment on a Sunday? That would make it a 7 day NHS. The NHS operates 24 hours a day 7 days a week, if you wish to have GP appointments at 10.00 p.m. on a Sunday that's fine. But you have to resouce it not spread it thinner. In that scenario you need more doctors, receptionists, diagnostic services, nurse, caretakers etc etc. If society wishes to fund that well fine. The problem is that there are no more doctors etc. or resources to fund them One third of GPs are planning to take early retirement in the next 5 years because they have had enough. This is all about destabilising the NHS to bring about privatisation. And guess where that will lead? You want to try getting an NHS dentist round Carmarthenshire." But that's a 7 day NHS, it doesn't change meaning just cos you don't think it's viable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject" that doesn't answer my question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"there are plenty of doctors without placements, Really? Can we see your reference for that. Meanwhile if it's such a great job just get yourself 3 A* 'A' levels, study for 6 years and get yourself a 'cushy little number' Better still have no qualifications and become an MP for a lot more money and half the hours." See my comment earlier. Would Jeremy Hunt reconsider his stance if he needed emergency surgery and the yawning surgeon said 'which leg?' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"there are plenty of doctors without placements, Really? Can we see your reference for that. Meanwhile if it's such a great job just get yourself 3 A* 'A' levels, study for 6 years and get yourself a 'cushy little number' Better still have no qualifications and become an MP for a lot more money and half the hours. See my comment earlier. Would Jeremy Hunt reconsider his stance if he needed emergency surgery and the yawning surgeon said 'which leg?'" I want to be in theatre for this! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way" Oh you are adorable!!! If you genuinely believe that then I feel for you. Maybe mention this next time you need their help. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way" Fucking Hell !!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no thanks I go private" .....they still did the same training. It's not different training for private doctors you know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way" Or sitting at home working while your flat mates live it up. Attending lectures from 0830 to 1730, Monday to Friday, and then having to do extra work outside those hours, while paying for the privilege. Have you actually been to uni? Or do you just get your understanding of student behaviour from articles in the daily mail? It does take longer to initially qualify as a vet, you're right. Because doctors only have to learn one lot of anatomy where vets have to learn multiple anatomies. Doctors then spend the next few years of their career first identifying their specialty area, then completing (and paying for out of their own pocket) further training to qualify in their area of special expertise. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. " I agree with you. I had planned surgery recently. I had waited a long time for it. I was in huge pain and had been for many years. When i got my date my work place organised cover for me. My hubby and his work place sorted out cover for him. We organised the hire of specialised equipment and alte_ed how our house is set out to enable me to be able to get about once home. My children were prepa_ed for it. I was nervous that my surgery would be cancelled and was warned that it was a possibility but we still had to sort out everything as if it was going ahead. If it had been cancelled due to the strike i would have been devastated. Plus our work places would have been seriously out of pocket. Plus we would have been out of pocket because we would still have to pay for the hi_ed equipment. I would have to spend heaven knows how much longer in pain with limited mobility. Not to mention the emotional issues surrounding it. Then we would have to do all that preparation again for the new date !!! I am behind the junior doctors but i don't agree with strike action. They should find other ways to resolve this issue ! I used to be a nurse and there was strike action taken while i was nursing however i didn't agree with striking then either so i worked, i did the job of several other members of staff to enable the patients to be kept safe and ca_ed for. That strike didn't solve anything then either ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"if u don't like your contract of employ show some balls and fuck off abroad.....there are plenty of doctors without placements, if not we will get some more from abroad who at least know what a days work is....all for 43k per year plus xtra payments ....not a bad screw" so what your saying is its ok to have immigrant doctors coming in..? you have changed your tune, normally your calling all immigrants scroungers, a drain, leeches not those who know what a days work is.. having balls btw is not about running away (another volte-face given you have been referring to the Syrians fleeing as cowards?), having balls is not being bullied by some duplicitous Politician who is hell bent on trouble.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way" . Of course it does! It's exactly the same job but you have the added problem of working on several different species that are very different!. Vets share practically the exact same university courses for about 5 years. PS vets get paid more than doctors | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. I agree with you. I had planned surgery recently. I had waited a long time for it. I was in huge pain and had been for many years. When i got my date my work place organised cover for me. My hubby and his work place sorted out cover for him. We organised the hire of specialised equipment and alte_ed how our house is set out to enable me to be able to get about once home. My children were prepa_ed for it. I was nervous that my surgery would be cancelled and was warned that it was a possibility but we still had to sort out everything as if it was going ahead. If it had been cancelled due to the strike i would have been devastated. Plus our work places would have been seriously out of pocket. Plus we would have been out of pocket because we would still have to pay for the hi_ed equipment. I would have to spend heaven knows how much longer in pain with limited mobility. Not to mention the emotional issues surrounding it. Then we would have to do all that preparation again for the new date !!! I am behind the junior doctors but i don't agree with strike action. They should find other ways to resolve this issue ! I used to be a nurse and there was strike action taken while i was nursing however i didn't agree with striking then either so i worked, i did the job of several other members of staff to enable the patients to be kept safe and ca_ed for. That strike didn't solve anything then either !" It should be a discussion between them and management. I don't agree with people suffering just so some people can make a point. It seems the opposite of what a doctor should do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject" So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way. Of course it does! It's exactly the same job but you have the added problem of working on several different species that are very different!. Vets share practically the exact same university courses for about 5 years. PS vets get paid more than doctors" PS. Vets take a longer course than doctors. Go figure. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. " this too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way. Of course it does! It's exactly the same job but you have the added problem of working on several different species that are very different!. Vets share practically the exact same university courses for about 5 years. PS vets get paid more than doctors PS. Vets take a longer course than doctors. Go figure." . I know, it's like it comes as fucking shock to some people.. . . Where the fucks Shipman when you need him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Obviously in the short term, the junior doctors strike will affect people. If it didn't, their action would have no effect. Better to complain to Jeremy Hunt that his actions are causing pain and dismay as he has equal power to relieve them, if not the skills or experience or qualifications or knowledge. " theis.. the BMA have been asking for talks since the last strike and even today said they would call off the Industrial action if the threat of imposition was removed.. Hunts response is to ignore the call for talks to resolve the issue and to say that they the BMA are trying to bring the Government down! complete codswallop and his actions are to play roulette with patients care .. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way. Of course it does! It's exactly the same job but you have the added problem of working on several different species that are very different!. Vets share practically the exact same university courses for about 5 years. PS vets get paid more than doctors PS. Vets take a longer course than doctors. Go figure." Ah....one of the obvious reasons is that doctors deal with humans who, physiologically speaking, are all generally the same but bets hVe to deal with hamsters and elephants via birds and snakes, the insides of which tend to be in different places and also doctors don't have to put their arms up cows woo-woos but vets do especially in Yorkshire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. " Why does it discriminate against women? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No they dont average vet pay is 30,000 a year unless they do large animal practice and get more experience then it rises to about the same level as a qualified JD, and they will turn up at any time of the day or night in all winds or weather, try getting a GP to do a home call at night, many now opt out of doing out of hours calls " GPs are not junior doctors and are thus irrelevant to this strike. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. I agree with you. I had planned surgery recently. I had waited a long time for it. I was in huge pain and had been for many years. When i got my date my work place organised cover for me. My hubby and his work place sorted out cover for him. We organised the hire of specialised equipment and alte_ed how our house is set out to enable me to be able to get about once home. My children were prepa_ed for it. I was nervous that my surgery would be cancelled and was warned that it was a possibility but we still had to sort out everything as if it was going ahead. If it had been cancelled due to the strike i would have been devastated. Plus our work places would have been seriously out of pocket. Plus we would have been out of pocket because we would still have to pay for the hi_ed equipment. I would have to spend heaven knows how much longer in pain with limited mobility. Not to mention the emotional issues surrounding it. Then we would have to do all that preparation again for the new date !!! I am behind the junior doctors but i don't agree with strike action. They should find other ways to resolve this issue ! I used to be a nurse and there was strike action taken while i was nursing however i didn't agree with striking then either so i worked, i did the job of several other members of staff to enable the patients to be kept safe and ca_ed for. That strike didn't solve anything then either ! It should be a discussion between them and management. I don't agree with people suffering just so some people can make a point. It seems the opposite of what a doctor should do. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? " impacts on single parents with hours | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours" That's not discrimination | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours" majority being women apparently | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? " The government's own equality assessment for what it's worth admits that the brunt of the negative effects will be borne by women, single mothers in particular. It will widen the gender pay gap in medicine and force many women out of their jobs as they find they can no longer afford childcare or juggle family life with their work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination " Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination " tell you what.. I'll come over to where you work, rewrite your contract and try to force you to sign it. Ok? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can anyone help me find the interview with a female doctor (also a single mother) explaining that she'll only have ~£80 a day left over after all outgoings (mortgage, car, bills, childcare, living expenses)?" It's all relative. £80 to someone with very little is a lot, £80 to someone with a healthy salary is peanuts. It's not just about pay....my concern is that I don't want an over ti_ed doctor treating me as they may make a mistake. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. " How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination tell you what.. I'll come over to where you work, rewrite your contract and try to force you to sign it. Ok? " Sure. It's still not discrimination. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way. Of course it does! It's exactly the same job but you have the added problem of working on several different species that are very different!. Vets share practically the exact same university courses for about 5 years. PS vets get paid more than doctors PS. Vets take a longer course than doctors. Go figure. Ah....one of the obvious reasons is that doctors deal with humans who, physiologically speaking, are all generally the same but bets hVe to deal with hamsters and elephants via birds and snakes, the insides of which tend to be in different places and also doctors don't have to put their arms up cows woo-woos but vets do especially in Yorkshire. " True. A dentist has a longer university course than a doctor, too. I don't think they have to put their arms up a cows woo-woo. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god u so right some piss poor a levels ,years pissing it up and party time...6 yrs doctor.....takes longer to be a vet by the way. Of course it does! It's exactly the same job but you have the added problem of working on several different species that are very different!. Vets share practically the exact same university courses for about 5 years. PS vets get paid more than doctors PS. Vets take a longer course than doctors. Go figure. Ah....one of the obvious reasons is that doctors deal with humans who, physiologically speaking, are all generally the same but bets hVe to deal with hamsters and elephants via birds and snakes, the insides of which tend to be in different places and also doctors don't have to put their arms up cows woo-woos but vets do especially in Yorkshire. True. A dentist has a longer university course than a doctor, too. I don't think they have to put their arms up a cows woo-woo." Not that they'd tell you as they was doing your teef. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can anyone help me find the interview with a female doctor (also a single mother) explaining that she'll only have ~£80 a day left over after all outgoings (mortgage, car, bills, childcare, living expenses)? It's all relative. £80 to someone with very little is a lot, £80 to someone with a healthy salary is peanuts. It's not just about pay....my concern is that I don't want an over ti_ed doctor treating me as they may make a mistake. " 20k free cash isnt something to scoff at. Anyway, I don't see why an educated doctor would not realise they're unfit to treat a patient. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. I agree with you. I had planned surgery recently. I had waited a long time for it. I was in huge pain and had been for many years. When i got my date my work place organised cover for me. My hubby and his work place sorted out cover for him. We organised the hire of specialised equipment and alte_ed how our house is set out to enable me to be able to get about once home. My children were prepa_ed for it. I was nervous that my surgery would be cancelled and was warned that it was a possibility but we still had to sort out everything as if it was going ahead. If it had been cancelled due to the strike i would have been devastated. Plus our work places would have been seriously out of pocket. Plus we would have been out of pocket because we would still have to pay for the hi_ed equipment. I would have to spend heaven knows how much longer in pain with limited mobility. Not to mention the emotional issues surrounding it. Then we would have to do all that preparation again for the new date !!! I am behind the junior doctors but i don't agree with strike action. They should find other ways to resolve this issue ! I used to be a nurse and there was strike action taken while i was nursing however i didn't agree with striking then either so i worked, i did the job of several other members of staff to enable the patients to be kept safe and ca_ed for. That strike didn't solve anything then either ! It should be a discussion between them and management. I don't agree with people suffering just so some people can make a point. It seems the opposite of what a doctor should do. " What if the management have lied, misinformed, treated with contempt, consistently refused talks on any reasonable terms (including this week) and have an agenda to break up the service you work for and believe in; and finally have stuck two fingers up and said take the terms that you absolutely believe will be dangerous and provide a poorer service for all patients, or lump it. What would you do then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands Your support of the strike doesn't negate my sympathy for those who suffer as a result. As I said above I sympathise too. You dismissed it as "not an emergency". I wouldn't say that's sympathetic, I'd say that's supporting the strike knowing (and caring very little that) its at the cost of patients." But the actual point is they are striking for the benefit of their patients in the long term. All their patients. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just gonna mention again that our A&E shut down recently because there's not enough staff for it because of the way the NHS is being run... Things are being shut down as of now. There'll be no services for anyone wanting test results, or even tests, if people don't oppose this and strike.." Exactly this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity?" explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. I agree with you. I had planned surgery recently. I had waited a long time for it. I was in huge pain and had been for many years. When i got my date my work place organised cover for me. My hubby and his work place sorted out cover for him. We organised the hire of specialised equipment and alte_ed how our house is set out to enable me to be able to get about once home. My children were prepa_ed for it. I was nervous that my surgery would be cancelled and was warned that it was a possibility but we still had to sort out everything as if it was going ahead. If it had been cancelled due to the strike i would have been devastated. Plus our work places would have been seriously out of pocket. Plus we would have been out of pocket because we would still have to pay for the hi_ed equipment. I would have to spend heaven knows how much longer in pain with limited mobility. Not to mention the emotional issues surrounding it. Then we would have to do all that preparation again for the new date !!! I am behind the junior doctors but i don't agree with strike action. They should find other ways to resolve this issue ! I used to be a nurse and there was strike action taken while i was nursing however i didn't agree with striking then either so i worked, i did the job of several other members of staff to enable the patients to be kept safe and ca_ed for. That strike didn't solve anything then either ! It should be a discussion between them and management. I don't agree with people suffering just so some people can make a point. It seems the opposite of what a doctor should do. What if the management have lied, misinformed, treated with contempt, consistently refused talks on any reasonable terms (including this week) and have an agenda to break up the service you work for and believe in; and finally have stuck two fingers up and said take the terms that you absolutely believe will be dangerous and provide a poorer service for all patients, or lump it. What would you do then? " Yeh you're right, in those cases I'd go against my training and refuse to treat people in need knowing I'm one of the few legally allowed to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can anyone help me find the interview with a female doctor (also a single mother) explaining that she'll only have ~£80 a day left over after all outgoings (mortgage, car, bills, childcare, living expenses)? It's all relative. £80 to someone with very little is a lot, £80 to someone with a healthy salary is peanuts. It's not just about pay....my concern is that I don't want an over ti_ed doctor treating me as they may make a mistake. 20k free cash isnt something to scoff at. Anyway, I don't see why an educated doctor would not realise they're unfit to treat a patient. " They do! That's one of the reasons why they are striking because Hunt doesn't realise (or does but doesn't care about consequences to patients) that people don't operate (pun intended) at peak performance when they are ti_ed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands Your support of the strike doesn't negate my sympathy for those who suffer as a result. As I said above I sympathise too. You dismissed it as "not an emergency". I wouldn't say that's sympathetic, I'd say that's supporting the strike knowing (and caring very little that) its at the cost of patients. But the actual point is they are striking for the benefit of their patients in the long term. All their patients. " For the patients at the expense of the patients doesn't make sense to me. It's like an abusive partner hitting out for their own benefit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem" I do not understand your question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem" why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity?" I didn't mention maternity. It's inhibition of promotion when you can't work enough hours because they won't give you the hours you need. Constructive dismissal when you can't afford childcare to go to work so have to quit. All discrimination. Even the government have admitted it discriminates against women. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise " I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem I do not understand your question. " Hunt's version of events and his contract | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I feel sorry for the people waiting in pain who will have received calls saying their electives are cancelled tomorrow. It's a shame patients are being punished and left to suffer. If it's elective it's not going to be an emergency. Frankly if things go on like this any longer people won't be able to afford the surgery anyway. All power to then. Completely behind them No, not life and death necessarily, but it doesn't mean that people aren't in huge amounts of pain waiting for electives. It seems sadistic to me to walk away from them. Oh and I also feel sorry for those waiting for a diagnosis who have had their clinic appointments cancelled. I know the waiting for a diagnosis was worse than being diagnosed mentally for me. So done. I've been there many times. Still behind them as my point still stands Your support of the strike doesn't negate my sympathy for those who suffer as a result. As I said above I sympathise too. You dismissed it as "not an emergency". I wouldn't say that's sympathetic, I'd say that's supporting the strike knowing (and caring very little that) its at the cost of patients. But the actual point is they are striking for the benefit of their patients in the long term. All their patients. For the patients at the expense of the patients doesn't make sense to me. It's like an abusive partner hitting out for their own benefit. " The patients are not an emergency, so not going to die. They are just going to be inconvenienced. Without the strike you are going to lose services anyway, some have gone already. So it totally makes sense to plan for the future of the nhs, than to carry on doing your job and allow the government take things away from us that are worse than one days inconvenience for non-priority patients. Nobody is invalidating that being inconvenienced is not a problem, but there's bigger problems than that right now and you can't sort them out by ignoring them and carrying on like nothing is happening to our NHS. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just gonna mention again that our A&E shut down recently because there's not enough staff for it because of the way the NHS is being run... Things are being shut down as of now. There'll be no services for anyone wanting test results, or even tests, if people don't oppose this and strike.." They are killing the NHS in order to sell it off when it fails. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? I didn't mention maternity. It's inhibition of promotion when you can't work enough hours because they won't give you the hours you need. Constructive dismissal when you can't afford childcare to go to work so have to quit. All discrimination. Even the government have admitted it discriminates against women." But it's not solely against women, men can take time off too to do other things, perhaps even paternity leave. I can't think of other jobs where you get promotions/pay rises when you're absent, I don't see how it is discriminatory to require people to work to improve their careers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. " how else can they stop a crap deal being imposed. Hunt and his faulty figures are the problem, plus his attitude to negotiation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. " i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. how else can they stop a crap deal being imposed. Hunt and his faulty figures are the problem, plus his attitude to negotiation " Exert leverage by solely inconveniencing the bureaucracy instead of punishing patients. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. " No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The terms offe_ed will effect different specialties differently. Some doctors will benefit financially, although their hours and terms will increase. Others - in particular A&E and critical care, already the most difficult areas to recruit to, will see a substantial pay cut. Why did Hunt absolutely, without discussion, reject proposals by the Royal Colleges and others to trial the new contract in a few areas before imposing it nationally? It seems very sensible proposal. If the government succeeds in imposing this contract they have already indicated that other NHS professionals will be subject to similar contract "negotiations". Nurses, HCA's, AHP's, porters etc; - they're undoubtedly coming for you next." the government are also being devisive, they are too sneaky to roll out contracts in one go. Try to get groups devided and arguing and slip controversial plans through | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's clearly all about the money. ... This article is worth a read. http://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/22/nhs-doctor-surgeon-junior-contract-quit-job-stress-family-children" DWP are offering £70-90k a year to doctors to work for them doing work capability assessments. A 9-5 office based job. However hard they try they cannot fill these posts. If JDs wanted more money they'd be biting the DWPs hand off to apply for those jobs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The terms offe_ed will effect different specialties differently. Some doctors will benefit financially, although their hours and terms will increase. Others - in particular A&E and critical care, already the most difficult areas to recruit to, will see a substantial pay cut. Why did Hunt absolutely, without discussion, reject proposals by the Royal Colleges and others to trial the new contract in a few areas before imposing it nationally? It seems very sensible proposal. If the government succeeds in imposing this contract they have already indicated that other NHS professionals will be subject to similar contract "negotiations". Nurses, HCA's, AHP's, porters etc; - they're undoubtedly coming for you next. the government are also being devisive, they are too sneaky to roll out contracts in one go. Try to get groups devided and arguing and slip controversial plans through" They've already come for nurses. Many times over. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. " The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's clearly all about the money. ... This article is worth a read. http://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/22/nhs-doctor-surgeon-junior-contract-quit-job-stress-family-children DWP are offering £70-90k a year to doctors to work for them doing work capability assessments. A 9-5 office based job. However hard they try they cannot fill these posts. If JDs wanted more money they'd be biting the DWPs hand off to apply for those jobs. " They take on all kinds of health professionals. I was offe_ed an interview with an almost guaranteed job for 35k per year..I'd rather have shat in my hands and clapped than work for that bunch of scumbags. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? " Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. " You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. " Sweetheart, like I said I have been in their position several times so I am not dismissing them. Go chew on someone else's bone eh. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. Sweetheart, like I said I have been in their position several times so I am not dismissing them. Go chew on someone else's bone eh. " No you're just making bogus claims that ignore the fact that they are, in fact, left without care. And don't be silly, I'm not your sweetheart. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. " Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. " Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government." It's not punishment. What are you not grasping. They are cancelled because there is not enough staff. Nothing to do with making a point or whatever rubbish you are spouting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government. It's not punishment. What are you not grasping. They are cancelled because there is not enough staff. Nothing to do with making a point or whatever rubbish you are spouting. " How is a strike not a punishment? Its removal of service, at the expense of a patient's quality of life. The appointments and procedures tomorrow are cancelled due to the strike. This strike is about making a political point. Perhaps if you don't understand this, then you may be out of your depth. You're seemingly lacking in compassion, anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's clearly all about the money. ... This article is worth a read. http://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/22/nhs-doctor-surgeon-junior-contract-quit-job-stress-family-children DWP are offering £70-90k a year to doctors to work for them doing work capability assessments. A 9-5 office based job. However hard they try they cannot fill these posts. If JDs wanted more money they'd be biting the DWPs hand off to apply for those jobs. " I would never ever work for them dirty bastards at the dwp., being party to denying benefits to the disabled, basex on dodgy assessments. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands and thousands of people work in jobs that require a seven day service and earn nowhere near what a JD does. Cant see the problem myself, In my job I work seven days a wk for long periods, as self employed its what I do to earn a living, if they dont want to they can always get a job doing something else Ridiculous comment Why ? If you or I dont like the terms and conditions of a job then we can leave and find a better one, no one will say they dont do a very important job but so do many others including care workes who work for far less and just as long. so what exactly is your back up plan when they all walk away from this particular career as you suggest? cant see many going anywhere, their pay is well above the national average and a big % of jobs require weekend working as part of their normal hours these days, I am not saying that there isn't a need for more doctors that is a completely different subject So you don't think that pay and conditions are linked in any way to the lack of NHS doctors in many specialities? Biggest problems with this contract are that it discriminates against women (who make up 60% of the workforce), it disincentivises doctors from choosing a career in the most acute specialities such as A&E with the biggest pay cuts and it will exacerbate existing staffing shortages which is not safe for those left behind and for patients. Why does it discriminate against women? impacts on single parents with hours That's not discrimination Yes it is. Refer to the legal case of Michelle Chew vs Avon and Somerset police. How is that case (allowing flexible working) related to doctor's pay being less if they take time out for maternity? explaint to me, why you follow the government line, when they manufactu_ed this problem why do you follow a politician's line, rather than those in the profession telling you otherwise I'm not, I just think striking when you're responsible for the care of people is not on. i respect that that is your view but for too long the fact that the NHS and some other public sector workers have been viewed as too caring to take Industrial action to protect the conditions of service etc has been fully exploited .. No one is being left without care as the senior doctors are doing the work for the day as they do when the JD's start their new rotation and no one has ever noticed a difference in service. Only addition is the non urgent ops being cancelled. For too long the NHS has worked on good will. The amount of overtime doctors/nurses etc do without pay is ridiculous. If care workers worked to rule, that would bring the NHS to a grinding halt. The people who have waited weeks for procedures or consultancy appointments are being left without care. I'm not sure why non emergency means that the person ceases to matter to you? Once again that's not what I'm saying. But you twist it for your own devices. You said no one is left without care and "only" non emergencies are cancelled. Those are cancer diagnoses, pacemaker fittings, biopsies. All are extremely important to the patient who is being turned away for a political point to be made. Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government. It's not punishment. What are you not grasping. They are cancelled because there is not enough staff. Nothing to do with making a point or whatever rubbish you are spouting. How is a strike not a punishment? Its removal of service, at the expense of a patient's quality of life. The appointments and procedures tomorrow are cancelled due to the strike. This strike is about making a political point. Perhaps if you don't understand this, then you may be out of your depth. You're seemingly lacking in compassion, anyway. " I was not on about tomorrow. I was talking about the countless other days that ops get cancelled because of staffing. I shall now move on from you due to lack of compassion and bo_edom of your ridiculous argument. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's clearly all about the money. ... This article is worth a read. http://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/22/nhs-doctor-surgeon-junior-contract-quit-job-stress-family-children DWP are offering £70-90k a year to doctors to work for them doing work capability assessments. A 9-5 office based job. However hard they try they cannot fill these posts. If JDs wanted more money they'd be biting the DWPs hand off to apply for those jobs. I would never ever work for them dirty bastards at the dwp., being party to denying benefits to the disabled, basex on dodgy assessments. " Likewise, I'd rather stick wasps up my arse. But if I was in it for the money..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government." Your argument of impacting 'the bureaucracy' is in my view a milder and less effective option than the emergency care strikes we have already had. They haven't worked. There is simply no other way forward. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government. Your argument of impacting 'the bureaucracy' is in my view a milder and less effective option than the emergency care strikes we have already had. They haven't worked. There is simply no other way forward." Other industries and services can do it and have set precedence of avoiding strike action. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government. Your argument of impacting 'the bureaucracy' is in my view a milder and less effective option than the emergency care strikes we have already had. They haven't worked. There is simply no other way forward. Other industries and services can do it and have set precedence of avoiding strike action. " Huntvs negotiation skills are crap. He talks about negotiation but doesn't comprise. Do you want an untried sytem imposed on an organisation like the nhs? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Do you realise how many appointments and operations are cancelled every week due to lack of staff or underfunding? Or how many will be cancelled in the future if this government succeeds in its aims? It's considerably more than the number from each of these strikes. Every day will be like a strike day. Again, I don't see why patients in need are being punished to make a point to the government. Your argument of impacting 'the bureaucracy' is in my view a milder and less effective option than the emergency care strikes we have already had. They haven't worked. There is simply no other way forward. Other industries and services can do it and have set precedence of avoiding strike action. " When push comes to shove and people remove their labour in an industrial dispute, its not taken lightly and is usually in these time the last resort to put pressure on, 'impacting bureaucracy' is pointless and it send's out a message that the people in dispute are not serious.. bit like one boxer putting his/her tongue out as an opponent winds up an undercut.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's clearly all about the money. ... This article is worth a read. http://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/22/nhs-doctor-surgeon-junior-contract-quit-job-stress-family-children DWP are offering £70-90k a year to doctors to work for them doing work capability assessments. A 9-5 office based job. However hard they try they cannot fill these posts. If JDs wanted more money they'd be biting the DWPs hand off to apply for those jobs. I would never ever work for them dirty bastards at the dwp., being party to denying benefits to the disabled, basex on dodgy assessments. Likewise, I'd rather stick wasps up my arse. But if I was in it for the money..... " Ii'm a trained nurse. I did it to help people. I couldn't live with myself by just doing it for money. I don't expect you to unerstand that. Greed isn't a driving factor for me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It has nothing to do with Doctors being concerned about patient care . Doctors (and other medical staff) are quite simply at breaking point. Why do you think lorry drivers and airline pilots etc have legally limited hours of work and rest breaks? Do you think a starting salary of £22,500 is greed for the training, resposibility and hours?" . Unlike lorry drivers Doctors can look forward to substantial increases in their salaries over their working life | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's clearly all about the money. ... This article is worth a read. http://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/oct/22/nhs-doctor-surgeon-junior-contract-quit-job-stress-family-children DWP are offering £70-90k a year to doctors to work for them doing work capability assessments. A 9-5 office based job. However hard they try they cannot fill these posts. If JDs wanted more money they'd be biting the DWPs hand off to apply for those jobs. I would never ever work for them dirty bastards at the dwp., being party to denying benefits to the disabled, basex on dodgy assessments. Likewise, I'd rather stick wasps up my arse. But if I was in it for the money..... Ii'm a trained nurse. I did it to help people. I couldn't live with myself by just doing it for money. I don't expect you to unerstand that. Greed isn't a driving factor for me" Not quite sure what you're saying with this. Not expecting who to understand? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It has nothing to do with Doctors being concerned about patient care . Doctors (and other medical staff) are quite simply at breaking point. Why do you think lorry drivers and airline pilots etc have legally limited hours of work and rest breaks? Do you think a starting salary of £22,500 is greed for the training, resposibility and hours?. Unlike lorry drivers Doctors can look forward to substantial increases in their salaries over their working life " unlike lorry drivers who deliver 'stuff', Doctors save lives.. every day, day in and day out someone will have their life saved in this country.. thats no disrespect to lorry driver btw.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |