 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I was hoping I might find I'd been sharing Fab with somebody famous.
How disappointing!"
I was contacted by someone in the public eye on this very site.
They were absolutely filthy as well and wanted to meet in Hyde Park and fuck... The only downside was she was adamant it was to be bareback... So that was another fantasy down the drain  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I was hoping I might find I'd been sharing Fab with somebody famous.
How disappointing!
I was contacted by someone in the public eye on this very site.
They were absolutely filthy as well and wanted to meet in Hyde Park and fuck... The only downside was she was adamant it was to be bareback... So that was another fantasy down the drain "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I was overly eager to find out who it was because I wasn't allowed to know. When I found out who was involved, I was suitably underwhelmed. "
lol me too . They are making a stand for other who find there sex life in the new.s that's what it's all about I feel.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If you want to see the overseas press relating to this non story, then download a dark web browser which by definition will not assume that you are in the UK (look up dark web browsers on google) and fill your boots......personally, I wouldn't fret about it as the story really is a load of crap. The only interesting thing is how the unenforceable law can still be applied when we have an international internet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I still dont know  "
it's there on the net for all to see so why the uk gagging order I don't know . I can only think they wish. To make a stand for themselves and others and see if they can make a point in court. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know someone on here who is regularly in the press.....on an almost weekly basis. (That's if you count the Angling Press lol!)"
Ohhhhh that man who does river monsters!?! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I wouldn't want a threesome with them! So very very not my type!
I had a one night stand with someone in a band, it was before they got signed but that still counts right? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I wouldn't want a threesome with them! So very very not my type!
I had a one night stand with someone in a band, it was before they got signed but that still counts right? "
Absolutely! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I was overly eager to find out who it was because I wasn't allowed to know. When I found out who was involved, I was suitably underwhelmed. "
The super injunction has meant far more people are interested than would have been had the story just been published.
In fairness the celeb in question is nowhere near as famous as their husband. But the husband has previously stated the relationship is open.
It really is a non story |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
THe thing is getting a gagging order made people wish to know all about this ... Why? I can only think to high light something they feel should not be in the news there private life. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
