From newspaper
Judges said the man, who can only be named by the initials PJS, was entitled to secure a legal ban on a tabloid newspaper which wanted to report the “open relationship” enjoyed by him and his married partner, known as YMA. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Que?  "
Aparently they are a celebrity couple who got an injunction to prevent some they had a three some with from talking.
Whilst I'm all for private lives being private I can't help but now be curious. It's in the news today. Apparently it rely available info every where in the world except the UK. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
this fascination with celebrity sex lives...its fucking sad and pathetic...people believe this to be 'public interest' , it is not..they are just nosey gossiping twats.
OMG god threesomes!- now I wanna know for sure... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
n a text message to AB on December 15, 2011, PJS asked whether AB’s partner, known only as CD, was “up for a three-way”.
“AB said that CD was. Accordingly, the three met for a three-way sexual encounter which they duly carried out,” the ruling said.
The sexual relationship between PJS and AB ended but they remained friends.
In early January this year AB and CD approached the Sun on Sunday about their sexual encounters with PJS. The newspaper approached the entertainer for comment.
PJS sought an interim injunction, and in response the newspaper’s lawyers argued there was a public interest in publishing the material.
Lawyers for the PJS and YMA, who is also a well-known entertainer, denied the article was relevant to any public debate, said the ruling. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I do think it should be private and the ones who went to the sun (it dosn't deserve the capital letters) are a couple of money grabbing shuts. ....but since the rest of the flippin world know about it....I want to know.....and because it's about it  I hate to be left out! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I've decided they SHOULD HAVE PRIVACY. Despite me loving being a finger pointer and giggler......... it transpires that they were in a very stable family relationship where they were committed to their children but decided to take 'lovers' They were open with each other.
Knowing this makes me feel they shouldn't have their family torn apart.
Specially by 'swingers'
P.S. If anyone finds out who they are , do let me know |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If the rumours are true on Google why did they bother .their c list at best and been rumours before .or as someone put it their now being talked about due to injunction where before no one ca_ed . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I've decided they SHOULD HAVE PRIVACY. Despite me loving being a finger pointer and giggler......... it transpires that they were in a very stable family relationship where they were committed to their children but decided to take 'lovers' They were open with each other.
Knowing this makes me feel they shouldn't have their family torn apart.
Specially by 'swingers'
P.S. If anyone finds out who they are , do let me know "
to be honest, even if it wasnt an 'open' type thing, a family torn apart by infidelity doesnt need it splashed over the papers. Despite the route cause being the cheater, I'd also think we as a society should help protect children from further mental scarring...plastering infidelity etc isnt really the high ground for moral crusaders, when at best their REAL reason to print, is to generate MONEY. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If the rumours are true on Google why did they bother .their c list at best and been rumours before .or as someone put it their now being talked about due to injunction where before no one ca_ed ."
What rumours ? About who ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I've decided they SHOULD HAVE PRIVACY. Despite me loving being a finger pointer and giggler......... it transpires that they were in a very stable family relationship where they were committed to their children but decided to take 'lovers' They were open with each other.
Knowing this makes me feel they shouldn't have their family torn apart.
Specially by 'swingers'
P.S. If anyone finds out who they are , do let me know
to be honest, even if it wasnt an 'open' type thing, a family torn apart by infidelity doesnt need it splashed over the papers. Despite the route cause being the cheater, I'd also think we as a society should help protect children from further mental scarring...plastering infidelity etc isnt really the high ground for moral crusaders, when at best their REAL reason to print, is to generate MONEY."
Couple involved have chosen to live the celebrity life and I feel sorry for the kids ,but,by choosing this life they have to put up with good and bad press . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If the rumours are true on Google why did they bother .their c list at best and been rumours before .or as someone put it their now being talked about due to injunction where before no one ca_ed .
What rumours ? About who ?"
Google them ...there's some really funny guesses |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I've decided they SHOULD HAVE PRIVACY. Despite me loving being a finger pointer and giggler......... it transpires that they were in a very stable family relationship where they were committed to their children but decided to take 'lovers' They were open with each other.
Knowing this makes me feel they shouldn't have their family torn apart.
Specially by 'swingers'
P.S. If anyone finds out who they are , do let me know
to be honest, even if it wasnt an 'open' type thing, a family torn apart by infidelity doesnt need it splashed over the papers. Despite the route cause being the cheater, I'd also think we as a society should help protect children from further mental scarring...plastering infidelity etc isnt really the high ground for moral crusaders, when at best their REAL reason to print, is to generate MONEY.
Couple involved have chosen to live the celebrity life and I feel sorry for the kids ,but,by choosing this life they have to put up with good and bad press ."
disagree:-
we talk about their input to the profession, not their private sex lives.
famous or not.
I cant stand the level of interest in celebrities sex lives, if they are putting it out there(themselves to generate interest/money), of course they bring what comes in most cases. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'd happily have a threesome with Jonny Depp and Helena Bonham Carter! 
Can't say I care who it is... people should be allowed a life and those who have no life should stop buying shite newspapers and go get one.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I've decided they SHOULD HAVE PRIVACY. Despite me loving being a finger pointer and giggler......... it transpires that they were in a very stable family relationship where they were committed to their children but decided to take 'lovers' They were open with each other.
Knowing this makes me feel they shouldn't have their family torn apart.
Specially by 'swingers'
P.S. If anyone finds out who they are , do let me know
to be honest, even if it wasnt an 'open' type thing, a family torn apart by infidelity doesnt need it splashed over the papers. Despite the route cause being the cheater, I'd also think we as a society should help protect children from further mental scarring...plastering infidelity etc isnt really the high ground for moral crusaders, when at best their REAL reason to print, is to generate MONEY.
Couple involved have chosen to live the celebrity life and I feel sorry for the kids ,but,by choosing this life they have to put up with good and bad press .
disagree:-
we talk about their input to the profession, not their private sex lives.
famous or not.
I cant stand the level of interest in celebrities sex lives, if they are putting it out there(themselves to generate interest/money), of course they bring what comes in most cases."
We are talking about people that sell their stories /do family at home picture spreads/sell pictures of new baby etc.. to keep them in public eye and earn money .their happy to do that but moan when stories are sold that aren't positive.no one forced them to become celebrates.
I only read that type of mag when at dentist or Dr's and am only doing this as stuck in a hospital and killing time . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I'm beginning to understand why Sydney University might be interested in this site lol
I love the way threads can develop in forums. Although some of the things I read about the McCanns on here yesterday could have come straight from the Daily Mail....and probably did lol.
Actually I never did find out what it was that Sydney Uni were up to....can anyone enlighten me? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
The Krankies?
They were on here?
I honestly don't know...what an innocent.
What was it that Sydney Uni did that makes people put those disclaimers on their profiles |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If they hadn't bothe_ed with injunction if the story had been printed would of been a5min wonder ,now it's more of a half hour wonder .
That's the thread killed and I'm still bloody waiting to be seen at hospital |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If they hadn't bothe_ed with injunction if the story had been printed would of been a5min wonder ,now it's more of a half hour wonder .
That's the thread killed and I'm still bloody waiting to be seen at hospital "
a five minute wonder in a throwaway society yes..maybe not to their children...
hope you read something nice |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If they hadn't bothe_ed with injunction if the story had been printed would of been a5min wonder ,now it's more of a half hour wonder .
That's the thread killed and I'm still bloody waiting to be seen at hospital
a five minute wonder in a throwaway society yes..maybe not to their children...
hope you read something nice "
Toss up between caravan life and auto trader. ..losing will to live |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If they hadn't bothe_ed with injunction if the story had been printed would of been a5min wonder ,now it's more of a half hour wonder .
That's the thread killed and I'm still bloody waiting to be seen at hospital
a five minute wonder in a throwaway society yes..maybe not to their children...
hope you read something nice
Toss up between caravan life and auto trader. ..losing will to live "
might at least find a dogging story in one of them  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If they hadn't bothe_ed with injunction if the story had been printed would of been a5min wonder ,now it's more of a half hour wonder .
That's the thread killed and I'm still bloody waiting to be seen at hospital
a five minute wonder in a throwaway society yes..maybe not to their children...
hope you read something nice
Toss up between caravan life and auto trader. ..losing will to live
might at least find a dogging story in one of them "
Nope but I know now more then I'll ever need to about chemical toilets  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You can find out in about 30 seconds if you google it and avoid uk sites 
I did because I'm nosy, but I agree they probably should be entitled t their privacy. Injunctions always backfire because it makes people who didn't even care curious to know who it was. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It tickles me how discretion is supposedly so very important to many in the swinging scene but so many on here are desperate to find out the names."
You are absolute right....but more curious than desperate to know. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It seems to just make the matter worse getting these injunctions ...everyone knows who they are now ...it probably would have blew over quicker without the injunction"
It is being challenged now, on the basis that it means feck all, now that everyone knows who they are.
Super injunctions. Pah! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Of course famous folk swing, they shit out if the same hole as the rest of us so why wouldn't they?