FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > God...
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What size constitutes a "good sized" bubble butt?" I'd say for me it would be a couple of handfuls per cheek at minimum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You have manboobs " It's the angle of the photo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you can believe in a 'God' that is fine with allowing kids to have cancer then you're an idiot. " When I bring that type of thing up with them they usually come back with "We are victims of circumstance". Doesn't make sense...God can do anything...including correcting bad circumstances, but he chooses not to...but he's a God of love..If I had infinite power and was made of love and sprinkles, no-one would suffer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?" Some do some don't. Depends on the person.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ? Some do some don't. Depends on the person.." Oh. Ok then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?" Beats me to. Maybe they think that clever, logical argument will destroy faith and belief. Personally, if I wanted to destroy the power of faith and belief I would set out to prove the existence of a god, not disprove it. Hard, irrefutable proof of the existence of a god would completely destroy any faith or belief. But I guess they just won't understand that either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You have manboobs It's the angle of the photo " a training bra is needed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For some, worshipping a God or having a belief brings them comfort. That's their choice and I kind of get it. Sarah " Yes , and I get that too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have a fat arse if that is any good to you " That is perfect for me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus " Interesting and tremendous quote : ) That pretty much sums up the contradictions etc.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For some, worshipping a God or having a belief brings them comfort. That's their choice and I kind of get it. Sarah " Yes definitely, that's part of it and is understandable. I heard a theory that it's also like a way to deal with the fear of dying because it gives comfort to think that we survive our own deaths. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ? Beats me to. Maybe they think that clever, logical argument will destroy faith and belief. Personally, if I wanted to destroy the power of faith and belief I would set out to prove the existence of a god, not disprove it. Hard, irrefutable proof of the existence of a god would completely destroy any faith or belief. But I guess they just won't understand that either." I think some understand that. That's one of the premises of the scientific process. If they have a theory they then have to try to disprove it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am a non believer " what about the gods of haribo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"god/religion is like sexual orientation, some will embrace you and accept it, some will spit, want to argue with the rights and wrongs. " ive been forced into conversation with Mormons maybe the fact that they look attractive asking me to be baptised. I checked them out I have to give up sex drinking give half my wages and walking round with a white garment which is almost like a chastity belt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?" Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. " I'll be honest as attacks on religion go that's pretty feeble. And as an aethiest my hear doesn't sink when I discover someone is religious it makes no odds to me. However their are character traits that do make my heart sink snd on occasion religion seems to exacerbate those. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sabrina would like to fuck a well hung priest and we would both like to have our way with a nun . Not sure if this is that relevant to the thread but thought we'd put it out there anyway " I'd definitely take the well hung priest. Nuns? Noooo, bad memories from school days | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. I'll be honest as attacks on religion go that's pretty feeble. And as an aethiest my hear doesn't sink when I discover someone is religious it makes no odds to me. However their are character traits that do make my heart sink snd on occasion religion seems to exacerbate those." It's not really meant as an attack. Just some thoughts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion?" There are Jehovah's witnesses at my station quite often. They are the least pushy people imaginable and simply wish most people good morning. I don't agree with their beliefs but have considerable respect for their commitment to those beliefs. And I've never encountered anything other than pleasantries from religious cold callers at home. I find chuggers far more persistent and unpleasant than any religious types | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion?" There are Jehovah's witnesses at my station quite often. They are the least pushy people imaginable and simply wish most people good morning. I don't agree with their beliefs but have considerable respect for their commitment to those beliefs. And I've never encountered anything other than pleasantries from religious cold callers at home. I find chuggers far more persistent and unpleasant than any religious types | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion?" There are Jehovah's witnesses at my station quite often. They are the least pushy people imaginable and simply wish most people good morning. I don't agree with their beliefs but have considerable respect for their commitment to those beliefs. And I've never encountered anything other than pleasantries from religious cold callers at home. I find chuggers far more persistent and unpleasant than any religious types | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion?" There are Jehovah's witnesses at my station quite often. They are the least pushy people imaginable and simply wish most people good morning. I don't agree with their beliefs but have considerable respect for their commitment to those beliefs. And I've never encountered anything other than pleasantries from religious cold callers at home. I find chuggers far more persistent and unpleasant than any religious types | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion?" I don't do buses sweetie. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion? I don't do buses sweetie. " You do have a sexy butt though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. I'll be honest as attacks on religion go that's pretty feeble. And as an aethiest my hear doesn't sink when I discover someone is religious it makes no odds to me. However their are character traits that do make my heart sink snd on occasion religion seems to exacerbate those. It's not really meant as an attack. Just some thoughts" it is an attack on religion, as youve cvompared it to a mental illness, and in turn offended some not all people with health problems When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion? I don't do buses sweetie. " That's good, so more the car | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?Is that so? every so often you get them religious groups coming up to you when waiting for the bus and if you say you dont believe, they will keep going on and on, so who needs to justify its existent of religion? There are Jehovah's witnesses at my station quite often. They are the least pushy people imaginable and simply wish most people good morning. I don't agree with their beliefs but have considerable respect for their commitment to those beliefs. And I've never encountered anything other than pleasantries from religious cold callers at home. I find chuggers far more persistent and unpleasant than any religious types " That is right, some groups are less pushy than others, recon as well they are jehovahs at my stop to, sometimes you get a leaflet as well. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. I'll be honest as attacks on religion go that's pretty feeble. And as an aethiest my hear doesn't sink when I discover someone is religious it makes no odds to me. However their are character traits that do make my heart sink snd on occasion religion seems to exacerbate those. It's not really meant as an attack. Just some thoughts it is an attack on religion, as youve cvompared it to a mental illness, and in turn offended some not all people with health problems When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem." That's your interpretation not mine. Mental illness isn't an insult. Again, that was your interpretation. I was trying to word it in a way that made sense and that's what came out. Like if someone told me they had depression, my heart would sink slightly in empathy as a fellow human bean. I don't look down upon them if that's what you mean. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am a non believer what about the gods of haribo " Them are nice too and the cola bottles as well | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. I'll be honest as attacks on religion go that's pretty feeble. And as an aethiest my hear doesn't sink when I discover someone is religious it makes no odds to me. However their are character traits that do make my heart sink snd on occasion religion seems to exacerbate those. It's not really meant as an attack. Just some thoughts it is an attack on religion, as youve cvompared it to a mental illness, and in turn offended some not all people with health problems When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. That's your interpretation not mine. Mental illness isn't an insult. Again, that was your interpretation. I was trying to word it in a way that made sense and that's what came out. Like if someone told me they had depression, my heart would sink slightly in empathy as a fellow human bean. I don't look down upon them if that's what you mean. " no you actually compared a persons religious believe to a person with mental illness as in your post or why put it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day?" I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sabrina would like to fuck a well hung priest and we would both like to have our way with a nun . Not sure if this is that relevant to the thread but thought we'd put it out there anyway I'd definitely take the well hung priest. Nuns? Noooo, bad memories from school days " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sabrina would like to fuck a well hung priest and we would both like to have our way with a nun . Not sure if this is that relevant to the thread but thought we'd put it out there anyway I'd definitely take the well hung priest. Nuns? Noooo, bad memories from school days " How about you and Sabrina dressing up as nuns ? Identical outfits , with the vwe priest and play the role as sisters ? That would definately work for me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. I'll be honest as attacks on religion go that's pretty feeble. And as an aethiest my hear doesn't sink when I discover someone is religious it makes no odds to me. However their are character traits that do make my heart sink snd on occasion religion seems to exacerbate those. It's not really meant as an attack. Just some thoughts it is an attack on religion, as youve cvompared it to a mental illness, and in turn offended some not all people with health problems When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. That's your interpretation not mine. Mental illness isn't an insult. Again, that was your interpretation. I was trying to word it in a way that made sense and that's what came out. Like if someone told me they had depression, my heart would sink slightly in empathy as a fellow human bean. I don't look down upon them if that's what you mean. no you actually compared a persons religious believe to a person with mental illness as in your post or why put it " Like I just said..I put it as a way to try and make sense. Insults are taken not given. I'm not giving any. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day? I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. " Only if people insist on shoving their beliefs down the throats of others - that includes the belief that believers are nuts | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sabrina would like to fuck a well hung priest and we would both like to have our way with a nun . Not sure if this is that relevant to the thread but thought we'd put it out there anyway " Well, of course you did | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Gods plural...." They got many in india | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Gods plural....They got many in india" Exactly. Are they all wrong, I wonder? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sabrina would like to fuck a well hung priest and we would both like to have our way with a nun . Not sure if this is that relevant to the thread but thought we'd put it out there anyway Well, of course you did " Any given opportunity | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?" I'm not at all sure they do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Gods plural....They got many in india Exactly. Are they all wrong, I wonder? " I wonder the same, they might be right there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"...do you get that slight sinking feeling" Well, you're sunk with me then. Janet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it that the people who are not religious talk about God much more than those who are ?" So true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"God loves all his children including the heathens that worship a different God to him , and those that don't believe in God Nothing you can do about it . That's how it is " what about the ginger ones | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day? I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. Only if people insist on shoving their beliefs down the throats of others - that includes the belief that believers are nuts" Even for those who are genuinely kind and good people and don't shove it down others throats, it still affects others if they don't trust in the scientific process it could affect progress and affect the way people vote which affects how we all have to live. I think it would be better if people could still get that comfort and solace and kindness without the religious part. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day? I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. Only if people insist on shoving their beliefs down the throats of others - that includes the belief that believers are nuts Even for those who are genuinely kind and good people and don't shove it down others throats, it still affects others if they don't trust in the scientific process it could affect progress and affect the way people vote which affects how we all have to live. I think it would be better if people could still get that comfort and solace and kindness without the religious part. " Religious people can still believe in science and progress. It's not the 16th century any more. You sound really smug and patronising about people who choose to believe in God. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"God loves all his children including the heathens that worship a different God to him , and those that don't believe in God Nothing you can do about it . That's how it is " This is the sort of thought process I mean. I obviously don't know you personally so lets assume you are a good person. It's unhealthy to not question your own views. That's not a healthy state of mind. It shows a fear of change possibly and a distrust in the scientific process etc...and when a lot of people think that way it can hold us all back. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day? I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. Only if people insist on shoving their beliefs down the throats of others - that includes the belief that believers are nuts Even for those who are genuinely kind and good people and don't shove it down others throats, it still affects others if they don't trust in the scientific process it could affect progress and affect the way people vote which affects how we all have to live. I think it would be better if people could still get that comfort and solace and kindness without the religious part. Religious people can still believe in science and progress. It's not the 16th century any more. You sound really smug and patronising about people who choose to believe in God." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"God loves all his children including the heathens that worship a different God to him , and those that don't believe in God Nothing you can do about it . That's how it is what about the ginger ones " Yes the ginger ones and the sodomists and the trannies And anyone else that you can think off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"God loves all his children including the heathens that worship a different God to him , and those that don't believe in God Nothing you can do about it . That's how it is This is the sort of thought process I mean. I obviously don't know you personally so lets assume you are a good person. It's unhealthy to not question your own views. That's not a healthy state of mind. It shows a fear of change possibly and a distrust in the scientific process etc...and when a lot of people think that way it can hold us all back." It's a totally non judgemental statement that keeps everyone happy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day? I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. Only if people insist on shoving their beliefs down the throats of others - that includes the belief that believers are nuts Even for those who are genuinely kind and good people and don't shove it down others throats, it still affects others if they don't trust in the scientific process it could affect progress and affect the way people vote which affects how we all have to live. I think it would be better if people could still get that comfort and solace and kindness without the religious part. Religious people can still believe in science and progress. It's not the 16th century any more. You sound really smug and patronising about people who choose to believe in God." No I don't mean this in a smug or patronizing tone. That's the problem with reading words on a screen..no tone of voice/body language etc... It's perfectly fine to question things and good. I already said earlier that I don't look down upon religious people. I have some religious friends and my brother is christian. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"God loves all his children including the heathens that worship a different God to him , and those that don't believe in God Nothing you can do about it . That's how it is what about the ginger ones Yes the ginger ones and the sodomists and the trannies And anyone else that you can think off " But if they don't believe in him or worship another god then he tortures them/us for eternity.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Op you come acroos as aperson with no religious believes, maybe you do maybe you dont, i can only go by what you have posted, but you seem to want to argue this, you compared a religious believe to a mental illness, made out its backward in the non scientific side. do you not realise op that many people have different levels of believe in whatever religion they choose you should read online roman catholics and there believe in science to enhance mankind" I didn't compare belief to mental illness. I was comparing the feeling when someone says they are religious. It was the feeling not the actual belief. I haven't heard of those roman catholics wanting to use science to enhance us. That's cool | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus " For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day? I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. Only if people insist on shoving their beliefs down the throats of others - that includes the belief that believers are nuts Even for those who are genuinely kind and good people and don't shove it down others throats, it still affects others if they don't trust in the scientific process it could affect progress and affect the way people vote which affects how we all have to live. I think it would be better if people could still get that comfort and solace and kindness without the religious part. Religious people can still believe in science and progress. It's not the 16th century any more. You sound really smug and patronising about people who choose to believe in God. No I don't mean this in a smug or patronizing tone. That's the problem with reading words on a screen..no tone of voice/body language etc... It's perfectly fine to question things and good. I already said earlier that I don't look down upon religious people. I have some religious friends and my brother is christian. " You said your heart sinks like it would if they had a mental illness, that they're holding back science and progress and lots of other things. It's not tone of voice that would make that smug and patronising, it's what you're actually typing. I'm not religious but I don't automatically think all religious people don't believe in science. I think you've missed what believing in god really means as well, I don't think many Christians these days beleive in lifelong torture and damnation for people who don't believe in god. Give people a bit of credit. Not everyone who believes or thinks something different to you is an idiot. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People need to find meaning to their lives, for some religion is the route. It doesn't stand up to rational analysis, but who cares if it helps some to get through their day? I think it matters to a certain degree because our beliefs and opinions affect others too. It affect the society we all live in so it's not really a personal thing. Like bringing up kids. Like I said to someone in pm a min ago, it's less about having a right to a view and more about having a responsibility to question our views/beliefs. I think religious thought processes make it more difficult to progress socially maybe. " I think the ability to question ones own beliefs has far more to do with the innate fundamental nature of the person than what they actually belief. Confirmation bias is not the sole prerogative of believers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sabrina would like to fuck a well hung priest and we would both like to have our way with a nun . Not sure if this is that relevant to the thread but thought we'd put it out there anyway I'd definitely take the well hung priest. Nuns? Noooo, bad memories from school days How about you and Sabrina dressing up as nuns ? Identical outfits , with the vwe priest and play the role as sisters ? That would definately work for me " I'll volunteer for the vwe priest but I may need a good prosthetic to play the part totally convincingly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is it possible to be a true believer AND a swinger?" There was *one* but he went, thank God | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is it possible to be a true believer AND a swinger?" Well as Christians are meant to believe that Christ came save sinners, not the righteous, I'd say possibly yes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You said your heart sinks like it would if they had a mental illness, that they're holding back science and progress and lots of other things. It's not tone of voice that would make that smug and patronising, it's what you're actually typing. I'm not religious but I don't automatically think all religious people don't believe in science. I think you've missed what believing in god really means as well, I don't think many Christians these days beleive in lifelong torture and damnation for people who don't believe in god. Give people a bit of credit. Not everyone who believes or thinks something different to you is an idiot. " No smugness and being patronizing are things done with intent. Like the other person it's your interpretation not mine. Tone very much matters when it comes to being patronizing. It's when you look down on someone and think your better etc...I don't think I'm better and will say again, I do not look down on religious people. I don't take responsibility for your interpretation. Smugness is suggesting I somehow thing I'm better or smarter. I do not think like that. It's information and thought processes and questioning things. I have not called anyone an idiot. I don't believe in idiocy. You're putting words in my mouth and projecting your interpretation on to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It doesnt bother me one jot. Im not religious but if i know someone is i admire there commiment to their beliefs and leave it alone. What works for someone else is none of mine if it doesnt affect me. I may not believe in god but i dont think think theres anything wrong with trying to comprehend something bigger than mankind. " I think it's good to try and comprehend or think about things bigger than us. I don't think it's good though to have total commitment to a belief. I think that is due to people attaching their identity to their belief and having an emotional attachment etc...It's not healthy to not question our own beliefs. The commitment without question is due to insecurity I believe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. " That seems rational to a certain degree yes. But whatever someone believes (political or religious etc..) will seem rational to them usually. That doesn't mean it is necessarily. Everyone thinks their views are rational and make sense. I think if God is intelligent enough to create the universe and us then surely he would be intelligent enough to find a way for us to learn lessons without the suffering. I saw very recently that some researchers somewhere are very close to being able to download information and skills directly to peoples brains (like The Matrix). If we are already close to being able to learn things in such a way then surely God, who is vastly superior, would have thought up a better way to learn things than suffering. He could have just created us with those lessons already learnt. Or better still...instead of Heaven, Earth and Hell he could have just created an infinite paradise for everyone from the get go. If the point of paradise is eternal love and happiness then why not just cut to the chase and create that on it's own. I can't figure out how an vastly intelligent being of love would make learning lessons so horrible. What lesson does a young baby learn if they are abused and killed? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am a non believer " . Were all non believers, everyone on here, some don't belive in Thor, some don't belive in Bacchus, some don't belive in Krishna, some don't belive Zeus and some don't belive in superman. I often find how we came about those beliefs far more therapeutic than having the beliefs in the first place! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. " . What lesson is this God teaching to a three month old with cancer! Or a two month old born with parasites eating it's eyes, what God could dream up such torture as the bot fly or ebola!. I'm sorry id rather throw my hand in with Joseph mengeler at least his intentions are honest if not the same! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there is a god,does it only belong to our planet?Do all the other worlds in the universe that can sustain life have one?" Is that agreement or re-iteration? lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am religious, however that doesn't necessarily mean I have to believe in (a particular) God. Religion can be many things. It doesn't have to always defend itself against a scientific argument, as religion to me is more about principle, community, empathy, compassion, kindness, helping those who need it and many other things. That is what the church has taught me. I appreciate that in stark contrast to what I have said above, religion causes more than it's fair share of problems globally, and that is a much larger discussion of which I'm nowhere near smart enough to get involved in, but for my part, I enjoy being from a religious family and upbringing and I believe that most who choose to embrace religion enjoy their choice too. It doesn't bother me that people aren't religious, just as it shouldn't bother anyone that I am. " Which church taught you that ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It doesnt bother me one jot. Im not religious but if i know someone is i admire there commiment to their beliefs and leave it alone. What works for someone else is none of mine if it doesnt affect me. I may not believe in god but i dont think think theres anything wrong with trying to comprehend something bigger than mankind. I think it's good to try and comprehend or think about things bigger than us. I don't think it's good though to have total commitment to a belief. I think that is due to people attaching their identity to their belief and having an emotional attachment etc...It's not healthy to not question our own beliefs. The commitment without question is due to insecurity I believe. " Heslthy or not. Thats human nature. Experiences create beliefs, beliefs get reinforced through more experience or knowledge (right or wrong). That belief underpins or becomes to a core value of the way you believe life should be lived. I dont think its unhealthy though. I know someone close to me who was severely depressed after losing two of their close family attempted suicide a few times. They turned to spiritualism and have been doing well ever since | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im asking because those qualities you mention are displayed by atheists too. You need to admit your religion or stop saying you are religious. " It's alright Granny, people who need to express their impositions on other people are the ones without direction. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am a non believer . Were all non believers, everyone on here, some don't belive in Thor, some don't belive in Bacchus, some don't belive in Krishna, some don't belive Zeus and some don't belive in superman. I often find how we came about those beliefs far more therapeutic than having the beliefs in the first place!" That is right we are a mix of non believers, but if we don't believe, there can not be a hell either? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do love a religious debate, and i do like to reduce most of them down to population control. However, i don't see why we all get so irate about it" . It doesn't bother me that much, I just find that religion should be regulated like alcohol, only for adults and a priest that tells you when you've taken it too far! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im asking because those qualities you mention are displayed by atheists too. You need to admit your religion or stop saying you are religious. It's alright Granny, people who need to express their impositions on other people are the ones without direction." I know where I've been and I know where i'm going ..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do you say GOD created these things? There are dark forces at play." Because it's said that God created everything and is all powerful. If he created everything then he created those dark forces and if he's all powerful then he could stop those dark forces.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"God or no god there has to be balance gravity with speed, light with dark, death with life. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do you say GOD created these things? There are dark forces at play. Because it's said that God created everything and is all powerful. If he created everything then he created those dark forces and if he's all powerful then he could stop those dark forces.." I guess you need to do some research on the concept and scriptures. The whole concept is that God has given freedom of choice is my understanding. So stop blaming evil God and take responsibility for all the bad things YOU chose to do ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. That seems rational to a certain degree yes. But whatever someone believes (political or religious etc..) will seem rational to them usually. That doesn't mean it is necessarily. Everyone thinks their views are rational and make sense. I think if God is intelligent enough to create the universe and us then surely he would be intelligent enough to find a way for us to learn lessons without the suffering. I saw very recently that some researchers somewhere are very close to being able to download information and skills directly to peoples brains (like The Matrix). If we are already close to being able to learn things in such a way then surely God, who is vastly superior, would have thought up a better way to learn things than suffering. He could have just created us with those lessons already learnt. Or better still...instead of Heaven, Earth and Hell he could have just created an infinite paradise for everyone from the get go. If the point of paradise is eternal love and happiness then why not just cut to the chase and create that on it's own. I can't figure out how an vastly intelligent being of love would make learning lessons so horrible. What lesson does a young baby learn if they are abused and killed? " A person of faith could argue that he has created such a thing already in the trees and plants. These things exist in a world where everything is provided and there is no real concept of good and evil. For us however, they could argue, that, in order for free will to exist, the choice has to exist to do evil. So the child that suffers from abuse is suffering that evil because a person, using their own free will, chose to inflict that evil on them. In short, you cannot have free will if people are not free to choose to do evil. It then follows that to remove evil from the world you would have to remove free will and if you remove free will then we are no longer human. This holds true whether you believe in a god or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Religion is a crutch for the weak and has cause more pre-mature deaths than any other cause you care to mention. It's about time the world woke up, then we can hope to go forward." I agree that it has caused lots of deaths. A crutch for the weak though? It could be argued that the church gained power from taking in those who felt they had no-one else to turn to. And that's our fault as a society for often failing to be fully inclusive. Sarah | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do you say GOD created these things? There are dark forces at play. Because it's said that God created everything and is all powerful. If he created everything then he created those dark forces and if he's all powerful then he could stop those dark forces.. I guess you need to do some research on the concept and scriptures. The whole concept is that God has given freedom of choice is my understanding. So stop blaming evil God and take responsibility for all the bad things YOU chose to do ?" There's no evidence for free will. There is growing evidence that we don't have free will though. They had a BBC Horizon documentary about it a while ago and had a guy wired up to a brain scanning machine to see which parts of his brain were active when he was making a decision. He had a simple choice to make and he was to tell them as soon as he was aware what he had decided. The researcher knew what his decision was 6 seconds before he did. It's not finished though as they have to get the time to so they can predict quicker decisions but it's not looking good for free will. It's seem our choices come from complex interactions that we are mostly unaware of and cause and effect as opposed to coming from free will. Nothing happens in isolation.. I have no issue with taking responsibility but what do you mean the bad things I do? I'm not doing bad things... Also, if God created everything then he also created the decisions we make so even from a non-scientific view point there is a contradiction there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am religious, however that doesn't necessarily mean I have to believe in (a particular) God. Religion can be many things. It doesn't have to always defend itself against a scientific argument, as religion to me is more about principle, community, empathy, compassion, kindness, helping those who need it and many other things. That is what the church has taught me. I appreciate that in stark contrast to what I have said above, religion causes more than it's fair share of problems globally, and that is a much larger discussion of which I'm nowhere near smart enough to get involved in, but for my part, I enjoy being from a religious family and upbringing and I believe that most who choose to embrace religion enjoy their choice too. It doesn't bother me that people aren't religious, just as it shouldn't bother anyone that I am. Which church taught you that ?" The one I've been a member of all my life. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Same old arguments, same old protagonists, same old bullshit. We need some new bullshit. If there is sentient life elsewhere in the universe do it/they have gods?" That's an interesting question. If the sentient life you talk about is at about the same level of the average mammal then I would say probably not. If, on the other hand it's at the level of the average human then I would say more than likely yes, for two possible reasons. 1) Because, if a god does actually exist then it would seem likely to that he would reveal his existence to other intelligent beings in a similar way to what happened here. 2) If no god exists then it seems likely to me that, whatever evolutionary pressure which led to intelligence here would probably be the same anywhere life exists and, if that was so, would lead to a convergent evolutionary process and thus similar beliefs in a god concept. However I seriously doubt that intelligent life exists anywhere else and, if it does, that it would exist at the same time as us. And that belief is based on statistical possibility. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. That seems rational to a certain degree yes. But whatever someone believes (political or religious etc..) will seem rational to them usually. That doesn't mean it is necessarily. Everyone thinks their views are rational and make sense. I think if God is intelligent enough to create the universe and us then surely he would be intelligent enough to find a way for us to learn lessons without the suffering. I saw very recently that some researchers somewhere are very close to being able to download information and skills directly to peoples brains (like The Matrix). If we are already close to being able to learn things in such a way then surely God, who is vastly superior, would have thought up a better way to learn things than suffering. He could have just created us with those lessons already learnt. Or better still...instead of Heaven, Earth and Hell he could have just created an infinite paradise for everyone from the get go. If the point of paradise is eternal love and happiness then why not just cut to the chase and create that on it's own. I can't figure out how an vastly intelligent being of love would make learning lessons so horrible. What lesson does a young baby learn if they are abused and killed? A person of faith could argue that he has created such a thing already in the trees and plants. These things exist in a world where everything is provided and there is no real concept of good and evil. For us however, they could argue, that, in order for free will to exist, the choice has to exist to do evil. So the child that suffers from abuse is suffering that evil because a person, using their own free will, chose to inflict that evil on them. In short, you cannot have free will if people are not free to choose to do evil. It then follows that to remove evil from the world you would have to remove free will and if you remove free will then we are no longer human. This holds true whether you believe in a god or not." If you see my above post about free will it looks like we don't have it. But lets say that we do for the point of example, if God is all seeing and he sees someone abusing a baby, free will or not, he could stop it and doesn't. He allows child abuse. Deity or not, that's unacceptable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem." You get a sinking feeling when you find out someone has a mental health problem? Wow I'm actually speechless. I cannot think of a single thing to say that won't result in being moderated into another dimension, so I'll stick with wow. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. That seems rational to a certain degree yes. But whatever someone believes (political or religious etc..) will seem rational to them usually. That doesn't mean it is necessarily. Everyone thinks their views are rational and make sense. I think if God is intelligent enough to create the universe and us then surely he would be intelligent enough to find a way for us to learn lessons without the suffering. I saw very recently that some researchers somewhere are very close to being able to download information and skills directly to peoples brains (like The Matrix). If we are already close to being able to learn things in such a way then surely God, who is vastly superior, would have thought up a better way to learn things than suffering. He could have just created us with those lessons already learnt. Or better still...instead of Heaven, Earth and Hell he could have just created an infinite paradise for everyone from the get go. If the point of paradise is eternal love and happiness then why not just cut to the chase and create that on it's own. I can't figure out how an vastly intelligent being of love would make learning lessons so horrible. What lesson does a young baby learn if they are abused and killed? A person of faith could argue that he has created such a thing already in the trees and plants. These things exist in a world where everything is provided and there is no real concept of good and evil. For us however, they could argue, that, in order for free will to exist, the choice has to exist to do evil. So the child that suffers from abuse is suffering that evil because a person, using their own free will, chose to inflict that evil on them. In short, you cannot have free will if people are not free to choose to do evil. It then follows that to remove evil from the world you would have to remove free will and if you remove free will then we are no longer human. This holds true whether you believe in a god or not. If you see my above post about free will it looks like we don't have it. But lets say that we do for the point of example, if God is all seeing and he sees someone abusing a baby, free will or not, he could stop it and doesn't. He allows child abuse. Deity or not, that's unacceptable. " But if there is God, there is also the Devil. Plus God gave us freedom of choice, hence sinning etc. So if you truly belive all of the God stuff, you cant really make such a statement without looking at why evil happens as well as good? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. . What lesson is this God teaching to a three month old with cancer! Or a two month old born with parasites eating it's eyes, what God could dream up such torture as the bot fly or ebola!. I'm sorry id rather throw my hand in with Joseph mengeler at least his intentions are honest if not the same!" Like I've said, you have free will to decide and if you decide to throw your hand in with someone you KNOW to be evil because you cannot understand how something that does not work the way you feel it should is not evil, that is your choice. However I have already said that, to a person of faith who beliefs that there is an after life, what ever injustice or suffering any may suffer in this world would ultimately be corrected and restored in the next. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The long and shorts is that we try to understand the concept of God, based on our own intellectual restrictions. God if it/he/she exists maybe nothing like we can comprehend or imagine or begin to perceive. For those who demand proof of God's existence. ...prove gods non existence. Open minds are best,and I certainly find the anti religious brigade a rather vindictive bunch at times. Let people choose their beliefs;you don't have to go out of your way to upset people who aren't really bothering you at all. " Well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there is a god,does it only belong to our planet?Do all the other worlds in the universe that can sustain life have one? Is that agreement or re-iteration? lol" I would think that only those that sustain intelligent life would be likely to have the concept of a god because, without intelligence there is no concept, whether a god actually exists or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. You get a sinking feeling when you find out someone has a mental health problem? Wow I'm actually speechless. I cannot think of a single thing to say that won't result in being moderated into another dimension, so I'll stick with wow." You've misinterpreted it. The example that I used earlier was if I found out someone had depression then yes I'd get a sinking feeling out of empathy that another person is having problems like that. Not to compare religious belief to mental health issues but to compare the feeling. I was trying to word it in a way that made sense. Some got it some didn't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If there is a god,does it only belong to our planet?Do all the other worlds in the universe that can sustain life have one? Is that agreement or re-iteration? lol I would think that only those that sustain intelligent life would be likely to have the concept of a god because, without intelligence there is no concept, whether a god actually exists or not." Oh I don't know. I see concepts proposed by those clearly devoid of intelligence on here quite often. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. That seems rational to a certain degree yes. But whatever someone believes (political or religious etc..) will seem rational to them usually. That doesn't mean it is necessarily. Everyone thinks their views are rational and make sense. I think if God is intelligent enough to create the universe and us then surely he would be intelligent enough to find a way for us to learn lessons without the suffering. I saw very recently that some researchers somewhere are very close to being able to download information and skills directly to peoples brains (like The Matrix). If we are already close to being able to learn things in such a way then surely God, who is vastly superior, would have thought up a better way to learn things than suffering. He could have just created us with those lessons already learnt. Or better still...instead of Heaven, Earth and Hell he could have just created an infinite paradise for everyone from the get go. If the point of paradise is eternal love and happiness then why not just cut to the chase and create that on it's own. I can't figure out how an vastly intelligent being of love would make learning lessons so horrible. What lesson does a young baby learn if they are abused and killed? A person of faith could argue that he has created such a thing already in the trees and plants. These things exist in a world where everything is provided and there is no real concept of good and evil. For us however, they could argue, that, in order for free will to exist, the choice has to exist to do evil. So the child that suffers from abuse is suffering that evil because a person, using their own free will, chose to inflict that evil on them. In short, you cannot have free will if people are not free to choose to do evil. It then follows that to remove evil from the world you would have to remove free will and if you remove free will then we are no longer human. This holds true whether you believe in a god or not. If you see my above post about free will it looks like we don't have it. But lets say that we do for the point of example, if God is all seeing and he sees someone abusing a baby, free will or not, he could stop it and doesn't. He allows child abuse. Deity or not, that's unacceptable. But if there is God, there is also the Devil. Plus God gave us freedom of choice, hence sinning etc. So if you truly belive all of the God stuff, you cant really make such a statement without looking at why evil happens as well as good?" I've already explained about free will above. It doesn't look like we have it based on the evidence/research so far. If God is all powerful then he could stop the Devil. I thought he sent the Devil to Hell so don't know how he keeps escaping to do bad things. What's the point of sending him to Hell if he can still do bad things anyway..Hell needs better security guards.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The long and shorts is that we try to understand the concept of God, based on our own intellectual restrictions. God if it/he/she exists maybe nothing like we can comprehend or imagine or begin to perceive. For those who demand proof of God's existence. ...prove gods non existence. Open minds are best,and I certainly find the anti religious brigade a rather vindictive bunch at times. Let people choose their beliefs;you don't have to go out of your way to upset people who aren't really bothering you at all. " If you scroll up a bit you'll see my posts about how our beliefs do affect other people. I also haven't been vindictive. Some people are unfortunately but I haven't been like that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. . What lesson is this God teaching to a three month old with cancer! Or a two month old born with parasites eating it's eyes, what God could dream up such torture as the bot fly or ebola!. I'm sorry id rather throw my hand in with Joseph mengeler at least his intentions are honest if not the same! Like I've said, you have free will to decide and if you decide to throw your hand in with someone you KNOW to be evil because you cannot understand how something that does not work the way you feel it should is not evil, that is your choice. However I have already said that, to a person of faith who beliefs that there is an after life, what ever injustice or suffering any may suffer in this world would ultimately be corrected and restored in the next." There is no evidence for free will. The research so far suggests that we don't have it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. That seems rational to a certain degree yes. But whatever someone believes (political or religious etc..) will seem rational to them usually. That doesn't mean it is necessarily. Everyone thinks their views are rational and make sense. I think if God is intelligent enough to create the universe and us then surely he would be intelligent enough to find a way for us to learn lessons without the suffering. I saw very recently that some researchers somewhere are very close to being able to download information and skills directly to peoples brains (like The Matrix). If we are already close to being able to learn things in such a way then surely God, who is vastly superior, would have thought up a better way to learn things than suffering. He could have just created us with those lessons already learnt. Or better still...instead of Heaven, Earth and Hell he could have just created an infinite paradise for everyone from the get go. If the point of paradise is eternal love and happiness then why not just cut to the chase and create that on it's own. I can't figure out how an vastly intelligent being of love would make learning lessons so horrible. What lesson does a young baby learn if they are abused and killed? A person of faith could argue that he has created such a thing already in the trees and plants. These things exist in a world where everything is provided and there is no real concept of good and evil. For us however, they could argue, that, in order for free will to exist, the choice has to exist to do evil. So the child that suffers from abuse is suffering that evil because a person, using their own free will, chose to inflict that evil on them. In short, you cannot have free will if people are not free to choose to do evil. It then follows that to remove evil from the world you would have to remove free will and if you remove free will then we are no longer human. This holds true whether you believe in a god or not. If you see my above post about free will it looks like we don't have it. But lets say that we do for the point of example, if God is all seeing and he sees someone abusing a baby, free will or not, he could stop it and doesn't. He allows child abuse. Deity or not, that's unacceptable. But if there is God, there is also the Devil. Plus God gave us freedom of choice, hence sinning etc. So if you truly belive all of the God stuff, you cant really make such a statement without looking at why evil happens as well as good? I've already explained about free will above. It doesn't look like we have it based on the evidence/research so far. If God is all powerful then he could stop the Devil. I thought he sent the Devil to Hell so don't know how he keeps escaping to do bad things. What's the point of sending him to Hell if he can still do bad things anyway..Hell needs better security guards.." I don't mean to nit pick or anything but security guards usually keep people out. Prison staff would be more suitable..... Just saying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. You get a sinking feeling when you find out someone has a mental health problem? Wow I'm actually speechless. I cannot think of a single thing to say that won't result in being moderated into another dimension, so I'll stick with wow. You've misinterpreted it. The example that I used earlier was if I found out someone had depression then yes I'd get a sinking feeling out of empathy that another person is having problems like that. Not to compare religious belief to mental health issues but to compare the feeling. I was trying to word it in a way that made sense. Some got it some didn't. " Frankly, bollocks. If that's what you'd meant you wouldn't have specified a mental health problem because surely, as a decent human being, you'd feel empathy and sadness for all illness and suffering? You meant that you think people with mental health problems and religious people are broken, defective thinkers and are lesser humans. Some do, indeed, "get it". You clearly have an issue with religion and a fundamental lack of respect for the beliefs of others, so to say you feel the same way about people with a mental illness is showing your low regard for them too. You're not showing any empathy with people with religious beliefs, you consider something is broken in their thinking. You do know that one in four people has a mental health condition? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" But if there is God, there is also the Devil. Plus God gave us freedom of choice, hence sinning etc. So if you truly belive all of the God stuff, you cant really make such a statement without looking at why evil happens as well as good? I've already explained about free will above. It doesn't look like we have it based on the evidence/research so far. If God is all powerful then he could stop the Devil. I thought he sent the Devil to Hell so don't know how he keeps escaping to do bad things. What's the point of sending him to Hell if he can still do bad things anyway..Hell needs better security guards.. I don't mean to nit pick or anything but security guards usually keep people out. Prison staff would be more suitable..... Just saying " DOH!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do you say GOD created these things? There are dark forces at play. Because it's said that God created everything and is all powerful. If he created everything then he created those dark forces and if he's all powerful then he could stop those dark forces.. I guess you need to do some research on the concept and scriptures. The whole concept is that God has given freedom of choice is my understanding. So stop blaming evil God and take responsibility for all the bad things YOU chose to do ? There's no evidence for free will. There is growing evidence that we don't have free will though. They had a BBC Horizon documentary about it a while ago and had a guy wired up to a brain scanning machine to see which parts of his brain were active when he was making a decision. He had a simple choice to make and he was to tell them as soon as he was aware what he had decided. The researcher knew what his decision was 6 seconds before he did. It's not finished though as they have to get the time to so they can predict quicker decisions but it's not looking good for free will. It's seem our choices come from complex interactions that we are mostly unaware of and cause and effect as opposed to coming from free will. Nothing happens in isolation.. " The fact, if true, that by scanning someone's brain you can found out what they have decided before their conscious themselves of their decision does not disprove free will. " I have no issue with taking responsibility but what do you mean the bad things I do? I'm not doing bad things... " You cannot claim to take responsibility and at the same time claim no such thing as free will. Either we are free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus responsible for those decisions, or we are not free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus not responsible. It's totally illogical to argue that we have no choice but are responsible. " Also, if God created everything then he also created the decisions we make so even from a non-scientific view point there is a contradiction there. " No, that doesn't follow either. The only way a god could create all the decisions would be if that god made all the choices and if that god made all the choices then there would be no free will. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. You get a sinking feeling when you find out someone has a mental health problem? Wow I'm actually speechless. I cannot think of a single thing to say that won't result in being moderated into another dimension, so I'll stick with wow. You've misinterpreted it. The example that I used earlier was if I found out someone had depression then yes I'd get a sinking feeling out of empathy that another person is having problems like that. Not to compare religious belief to mental health issues but to compare the feeling. I was trying to word it in a way that made sense. Some got it some didn't. Frankly, bollocks. If that's what you'd meant you wouldn't have specified a mental health problem because surely, as a decent human being, you'd feel empathy and sadness for all illness and suffering? You meant that you think people with mental health problems and religious people are broken, defective thinkers and are lesser humans. Some do, indeed, "get it". You clearly have an issue with religion and a fundamental lack of respect for the beliefs of others, so to say you feel the same way about people with a mental illness is showing your low regard for them too. You're not showing any empathy with people with religious beliefs, you consider something is broken in their thinking. You do know that one in four people has a mental health condition?" I know what I meant and have explained it. Yes I'm aware mental health is relatively common. My brother has multiple conditions and I have had depression and bad anxiety also. And my other syblings..and birth mother. You have misinterpreted what I said which is understandable but your now putting words in my mouth. I know what I mean but that doesn't mean I'm always good at communicating it. I thought my OP was clear enough and it didn't cross my mind to specify a specific condition which is why I did specify one when it was brought up to try and explain my meaning better. I don't take responsibility for you interpretation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The fact, if true, that by scanning someone's brain you can found out what they have decided before their conscious themselves of their decision does not disprove free will. I have no issue with taking responsibility but what do you mean the bad things I do? I'm not doing bad things... You cannot claim to take responsibility and at the same time claim no such thing as free will. Either we are free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus responsible for those decisions, or we are not free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus not responsible. It's totally illogical to argue that we have no choice but are responsible. Also, if God created everything then he also created the decisions we make so even from a non-scientific view point there is a contradiction there. No, that doesn't follow either. The only way a god could create all the decisions would be if that god made all the choices and if that god made all the choices then there would be no free will." Yes that experiment does point to us not having free will. Free will as in making conscious decisions looks unlikely. I can still take responsibility because as I said earlier, the free will thing hasn't been proved fully yet. There is more for the researchers to do yet. It's just a probability just now. So if it turns out we do have it somehow, then I can take responsibility. Yes if God made all the choices then we would have no free will..that's what I've been saying. It doesn't look like we do based on the research so far. We live in a reality where everything is a system. Cause and effect. Inter-relating parts interacting. Nothing seems to be self activating. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. You get a sinking feeling when you find out someone has a mental health problem? Wow I'm actually speechless. I cannot think of a single thing to say that won't result in being moderated into another dimension, so I'll stick with wow. You've misinterpreted it. The example that I used earlier was if I found out someone had depression then yes I'd get a sinking feeling out of empathy that another person is having problems like that. Not to compare religious belief to mental health issues but to compare the feeling. I was trying to word it in a way that made sense. Some got it some didn't. Frankly, bollocks. If that's what you'd meant you wouldn't have specified a mental health problem because surely, as a decent human being, you'd feel empathy and sadness for all illness and suffering? You meant that you think people with mental health problems and religious people are broken, defective thinkers and are lesser humans. Some do, indeed, "get it". You clearly have an issue with religion and a fundamental lack of respect for the beliefs of others, so to say you feel the same way about people with a mental illness is showing your low regard for them too. You're not showing any empathy with people with religious beliefs, you consider something is broken in their thinking. You do know that one in four people has a mental health condition? I know what I meant and have explained it. Yes I'm aware mental health is relatively common. My brother has multiple conditions and I have had depression and bad anxiety also. And my other syblings..and birth mother. You have misinterpreted what I said which is understandable but your now putting words in my mouth. I know what I mean but that doesn't mean I'm always good at communicating it. I thought my OP was clear enough and it didn't cross my mind to specify a specific condition which is why I did specify one when it was brought up to try and explain my meaning better. I don't take responsibility for you interpretation. " More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. . What lesson is this God teaching to a three month old with cancer! Or a two month old born with parasites eating it's eyes, what God could dream up such torture as the bot fly or ebola!. I'm sorry id rather throw my hand in with Joseph mengeler at least his intentions are honest if not the same! Like I've said, you have free will to decide and if you decide to throw your hand in with someone you KNOW to be evil because you cannot understand how something that does not work the way you feel it should is not evil, that is your choice. However I have already said that, to a person of faith who beliefs that there is an after life, what ever injustice or suffering any may suffer in this world would ultimately be corrected and restored in the next. There is no evidence for free will. The research so far suggests that we don't have it. " I disagree. The evidence does not suggest that free will does not exist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" There is no evidence for free willy. The research so far suggests that we don't have it. " It gets offered frequently on here...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you can believe in a 'God' that is fine with allowing kids to have cancer then you're an idiot. " . It is difficult to see what correlation there is between God and Cancer or why someone should be described as an idiot . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. " . What would that fact that someone is religious give someone a sinking feeling . I think most religious people are more tolerant that the non religious . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think most religious people are more tolerant that the non religious ." I too have met some tolerant religious peeps, but by and large they are few and far between. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sabrina would like to fuck a well hung priest and we would both like to have our way with a nun . Not sure if this is that relevant to the thread but thought we'd put it out there anyway " Jeez you've got some bad habits! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The fact, if true, that by scanning someone's brain you can found out what they have decided before their conscious themselves of their decision does not disprove free will. I have no issue with taking responsibility but what do you mean the bad things I do? I'm not doing bad things... You cannot claim to take responsibility and at the same time claim no such thing as free will. Either we are free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus responsible for those decisions, or we are not free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus not responsible. It's totally illogical to argue that we have no choice but are responsible. Also, if God created everything then he also created the decisions we make so even from a non-scientific view point there is a contradiction there. No, that doesn't follow either. The only way a god could create all the decisions would be if that god made all the choices and if that god made all the choices then there would be no free will. Yes that experiment does point to us not having free will. Free will as in making conscious decisions looks unlikely. I can still take responsibility because as I said earlier, the free will thing hasn't been proved fully yet. There is more for the researchers to do yet. It's just a probability just now. So if it turns out we do have it somehow, then I can take responsibility. Yes if God made all the choices then we would have no free will..that's what I've been saying. It doesn't look like we do based on the research so far. " But the results of the research don't prove that and, in my opinion, don't even suggest that. However it's also irrelevant to the argument because, those that believe in a god would also mostly believe in free will and an after life. And the belief in all those things is that is required to make an internally reasonable argument as to why evil exists in this world. " We live in a reality where everything is a system. Cause and effect. Inter-relating parts interacting. Nothing seems to be self activating. " No, we live in a reality where you have the possibility and choice to make your own decision but the downside of that is that you are responsible for those decisions and you and possibly others, have to live with the results of those decisions. And that believing that does not require a belief in any god either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The fact, if true, that by scanning someone's brain you can found out what they have decided before their conscious themselves of their decision does not disprove free will. I have no issue with taking responsibility but what do you mean the bad things I do? I'm not doing bad things... You cannot claim to take responsibility and at the same time claim no such thing as free will. Either we are free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus responsible for those decisions, or we are not free to make decisions for ourselves, and thus not responsible. It's totally illogical to argue that we have no choice but are responsible. Also, if God created everything then he also created the decisions we make so even from a non-scientific view point there is a contradiction there. No, that doesn't follow either. The only way a god could create all the decisions would be if that god made all the choices and if that god made all the choices then there would be no free will. Yes that experiment does point to us not having free will. Free will as in making conscious decisions looks unlikely. I can still take responsibility because as I said earlier, the free will thing hasn't been proved fully yet. There is more for the researchers to do yet. It's just a probability just now. So if it turns out we do have it somehow, then I can take responsibility. Yes if God made all the choices then we would have no free will..that's what I've been saying. It doesn't look like we do based on the research so far. But the results of the research don't prove that and, in my opinion, don't even suggest that. However it's also irrelevant to the argument because, those that believe in a god would also mostly believe in free will and an after life. And the belief in all those things is that is required to make an internally reasonable argument as to why evil exists in this world. We live in a reality where everything is a system. Cause and effect. Inter-relating parts interacting. Nothing seems to be self activating. No, we live in a reality where you have the possibility and choice to make your own decision but the downside of that is that you are responsible for those decisions and you and possibly others, have to live with the results of those decisions. And that believing that does not require a belief in any god either." You are aware not every human born does have free will ? You are aware things happen to a human brain that means the person that is or was is not accountable for its actions . And you are aware if a god existed it took a billion billion years to design that human exactly that way xxx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him." I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. " Rubbish. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do y'all think this imaginary God guy sounds a bit evil? Basically it's "tell me I'm amazing or I'll torture you forever." Sounds like Donald Trump. I think there probably is other beings that are more intelligent or aware than us but not in the traditional "God" type of way. When you find out someone is religious, do you get that slight sinking feeling? Almost like they've just told you they have a mental problem. Really it's a thought pattern problem. Also, I like good sized bubble butts. . What would that fact that someone is religious give someone a sinking feeling . I think most religious people are more tolerant that the non religious ." I think there are tolerant and intolerant people on both sides. A sinking feeling because it's another person with a train of thought that isn't helping to progress us to something better. Religion can do good for people. I get that. But it is holding us back I feel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. " Sure sounded to me like you're looking down on those of us who believe in God. You know if multiple people independently "misunderstand" you, the problem is probably with you and the words you've used, not with them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. Rubbish." It's not rubbish. You don't know me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. Sure sounded to me like you're looking down on those of us who believe in God. You know if multiple people independently "misunderstand" you, the problem is probably with you and the words you've used, not with them." That's not true. If multiple people believe something, that doesn't make it so. People used to think that the Sun orbited the Earth. They were all wrong. It's not rare for large numbers of people to be wrong. We get things wrong all the time. If it seems to you I'm looking down on people then you are not understanding my meaning. I can try to explain, which I have, but it's out of my control and responsibility if you understand it or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then He is not omnipotent. Is He able, but not willing? Then He is malevolent. Is He both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is He neither able nor willing? Then why call Him God?" Epicurus For most people of a monotheistic faith the entire purpose of existence is for us to learn and grow. This is done only by facing opposition - which, much of the time, would be seen as evil. Their God allows evil to exist not because He is malevolent or uncaring, but because it is part of a plan. They would tend to belief in the need to be able to choose and, as long as that freedom to choose exists, people are able to choose to do evil. It's an interesting paradox that the very people who complain that religion is "controlling" by giving a simple code to live by are the very same people who think that a God should directly control everyone and everything. But those of faith would also argue that it is false to say that their God allows evil indefinitely. Their God would only allow evil to exist within a given time, but in the end, everything would be made whole and right. Those who have suffered unjustly would undergo a complete restoration and find a glory far surpassing any trials they have gone through, however heavy they may have seemed at the moment. You may not believe in this explanation, but it is internally consistent and rational, and it shows how things are not necessarily so simplistic as the question suggests. . What lesson is this God teaching to a three month old with cancer! Or a two month old born with parasites eating it's eyes, what God could dream up such torture as the bot fly or ebola!. I'm sorry id rather throw my hand in with Joseph mengeler at least his intentions are honest if not the same! Like I've said, you have free will to decide and if you decide to throw your hand in with someone you KNOW to be evil because you cannot understand how something that does not work the way you feel it should is not evil, that is your choice. However I have already said that, to a person of faith who beliefs that there is an after life, what ever injustice or suffering any may suffer in this world would ultimately be corrected and restored in the next." . . . On that principle,then with the right "belief" , humans can do anything and feel justified. The only thing I want to satisfy is MY conscience, I don't need morality lessons from a God that likes to teach 3 months old a life lesson with unbelievable cruelty, no matter how much fucking love it promises them after, what your actually describing is the relationship between a battered partner and they're abusive other half, always promising ever lasting love while dishing out lessons in retribution!. . . I'm not really particularly fussed about religious people or even religion providing they keep it to themselves and at least quit this dishonesty!. You haven't got a clue what's out there just like everybody else, all this he says this, he does good, he loves in the afterlife is at very best just guesswork by yourself, on that basis I have no objections, but to tell others this is reality, is just mass nonsense that wouldn't be allowed on any other level except religion!. So to I have no objections to people believing what ever they wish, what I object to is it being taught as if it's anything else but made up guesswork... Cigarettes come with a warning written on them, this product contains deadly carcinogens. Religion should have the same, warning everything this person tells you is just random guesswork and has no basis of reality, take every word with a pinch of salt!. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it on these forums that it's people who don't believe in God and think those that do are stupid/evil/idiots bang on about it far more than anyone who identifies as religious ever does? Some people choose to have faith. Some choose to believe in one God, many gods or no god. Some follow set religions. Get over it. " I haven't accused any religious person of being stupid/evil/idiots. I don't believe in stupidity. Some people don't want to 'get over it' because they can see a problem that is holding us back. Not so much religion itself, but the train of thought needed to believe in it without question. If someone questions their beliefs (religious or otherwise) then that is good. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. Sure sounded to me like you're looking down on those of us who believe in God. You know if multiple people independently "misunderstand" you, the problem is probably with you and the words you've used, not with them. That's not true. If multiple people believe something, that doesn't make it so. People used to think that the Sun orbited the Earth. They were all wrong. It's not rare for large numbers of people to be wrong. We get things wrong all the time. If it seems to you I'm looking down on people then you are not understanding my meaning. I can try to explain, which I have, but it's out of my control and responsibility if you understand it or not. " Oh I understand perfectly. In fact you've just chosen to insult and patronise further by suggesting your wise words are beyond the capacity of my little brain... Let me rephrase for you, because you clearly didn't understand my point: if multiple people independently fail to appreciate the "meaning" of your words, it's because you're choosing those words poorly. Because if you were expressing yourself as you claim to intend, why would anyone think you were being condescending? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it on these forums that it's people who don't believe in God and think those that do are stupid/evil/idiots bang on about it far more than anyone who identifies as religious ever does? Some people choose to have faith. Some choose to believe in one God, many gods or no god. Some follow set religions. Get over it. I haven't accused any religious person of being stupid/evil/idiots. I don't believe in stupidity. Some people don't want to 'get over it' because they can see a problem that is holding us back. Not so much religion itself, but the train of thought needed to believe in it without question. If someone questions their beliefs (religious or otherwise) then that is good. " So why do you get "that sinking feeling"? Most religious people I know challenge and question their beliefs about the world far more than those who accept unfailingly that God is bollocks. Why don't you think the religious people who give you "that sinking feeling" are capable of that? And you have heavily, heavily insinuated most of those things I've suggested in various posts on this thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. Rubbish. It's not rubbish. You don't know me. " I don't need to know you to read your words and see how you feel about religious people and those with mental health problems. If you think you don't massively disrespect both those groups of people, you are not very self aware. What you meant when you mentioned finding out someone has a mental health problem is the "sinking feeling" of realising that someone is a "nutter". And you also get that feeling when you find out someone is religious. Both groups have defective thought processes, (your claim, you actually said that). Do you think describing people as, essentially, defective is not an insult? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. Sure sounded to me like you're looking down on those of us who believe in God. You know if multiple people independently "misunderstand" you, the problem is probably with you and the words you've used, not with them. That's not true. If multiple people believe something, that doesn't make it so. People used to think that the Sun orbited the Earth. They were all wrong. It's not rare for large numbers of people to be wrong. We get things wrong all the time. If it seems to you I'm looking down on people then you are not understanding my meaning. I can try to explain, which I have, but it's out of my control and responsibility if you understand it or not. " . Your nearly write but missing a bit. Nobody thought the sun orbited the earth ... They just "believed" it through religious doctrine!. Some people thought... Err that doesn't ring true and thought about maybe reasoning why and what instead of just believing.... And the church, nailed them people up!... Blasphemer! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And you have heavily, heavily insinuated most of those things I've suggested in various posts on this thread. " Except I'd add a few more heavilies and a very or four. I think the OP believes he is being a lot more subtle than is actually the case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. Sure sounded to me like you're looking down on those of us who believe in God. You know if multiple people independently "misunderstand" you, the problem is probably with you and the words you've used, not with them. That's not true. If multiple people believe something, that doesn't make it so. People used to think that the Sun orbited the Earth. They were all wrong. It's not rare for large numbers of people to be wrong. We get things wrong all the time. If it seems to you I'm looking down on people then you are not understanding my meaning. I can try to explain, which I have, but it's out of my control and responsibility if you understand it or not. Oh I understand perfectly. In fact you've just chosen to insult and patronise further by suggesting your wise words are beyond the capacity of my little brain... Let me rephrase for you, because you clearly didn't understand my point: if multiple people independently fail to appreciate the "meaning" of your words, it's because you're choosing those words poorly. Because if you were expressing yourself as you claim to intend, why would anyone think you were being condescending? " I don't think it's good to assume you understand someone. I know what I mean. I know that you think I mean something else, because you've said so. It's nothing to do with anyones 'little brain'. I think you would be perfectly capable of understanding me if I was able to explain it better. I've explained it the best I can. I didn't claim I had expressed myself perfectly. Just that I have tried. I haven't patronized anyone. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. There are also people on the thread who have not taken my word the wrong way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've got a decent bum but I don't think it's a bubble butt btw... " Bubble butts or no bubble butts..butts are great! : D Except when their on the toilet...lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"was it John Lennon who said, 'whatever gets you through your night, is alright'..? " . Yeah he was talking about barbiturates that he was addicted to at the time though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it on these forums that it's people who don't believe in God and think those that do are stupid/evil/idiots bang on about it far more than anyone who identifies as religious ever does? Some people choose to have faith. Some choose to believe in one God, many gods or no god. Some follow set religions. Get over it. I haven't accused any religious person of being stupid/evil/idiots. I don't believe in stupidity. Some people don't want to 'get over it' because they can see a problem that is holding us back. Not so much religion itself, but the train of thought needed to believe in it without question. If someone questions their beliefs (religious or otherwise) then that is good. So why do you get "that sinking feeling"? Most religious people I know challenge and question their beliefs about the world far more than those who accept unfailingly that God is bollocks. Why don't you think the religious people who give you "that sinking feeling" are capable of that? And you have heavily, heavily insinuated most of those things I've suggested in various posts on this thread. " I've explained before why there's a sinking feeling if you scroll up It's not that I don't think people with religious belief aren't capable of questioning their beliefs, but their train of thought is less questioning. They're capable but don't. Some will but I'm speaking generally. I haven't met many religious people who question their beliefs. One or two but not many. It's true also though that not all non-religious people question their views too yes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" More like you're trying not to take responsibility for what you said and for insulting a huge proportion of the population of the Earth. Your meaning was clear. People with mental health problems and religious people are defective. You have no empathy with either. You're clearly showing how you feel about those who have religious beliefs. You compare the two, then clearly look down on the religious as having problems with their thinking, yet claim you merely feel sad for those with poor mental health? You linked the two in your post and your thoughts about one category are blindingly clear. I'm quite sure if there is a God, he has at least as many problems with you as you have with Him. I have insulted no-one. Insults are taken not given. I have given none. You don't know me personally. Saying I have no empathy for either is not true. I do think that the thought process to believe something (religious or otherwise) without question isn't good. I have said that I do not look down upon religious people (or people with mental health issues). You have misinterpreted what I said. You are putting words in my mouth. I have said I was comparing a feeling, not mental health with religious belief. I tell you what I mean not the other way round. You are telling me what you THINK I mean, not what I actually mean. I did not say I merely feel sad. I said I feel empathy. What you are saying about me is categorically not true. If you knew me personally then you would know that I have empathy for people. Some people are more in tune with others emotions and can feel them. That's empathy. I have it. My wording of my OP has been misunderstood by you and know you are accusing me of some very serious things. Again, I take no responsibility for your misunderstanding. I have tried to explain to you my meaning but you seem convinced you know me even though you have never met me. I know about mental health. I know what my views on religious belief are. My views do not include looking down on people. This isn't about being better than anyone. Rubbish. It's not rubbish. You don't know me. I don't need to know you to read your words and see how you feel about religious people and those with mental health problems. If you think you don't massively disrespect both those groups of people, you are not very self aware. What you meant when you mentioned finding out someone has a mental health problem is the "sinking feeling" of realising that someone is a "nutter". And you also get that feeling when you find out someone is religious. Both groups have defective thought processes, (your claim, you actually said that). Do you think describing people as, essentially, defective is not an insult? " Excuse me? I have NOT under any circumstances implied people with mental health issues are nutters. YOU have just said that. YOU..NOT me. You are putting words in my mouth. You are reading my words but interpreting them wrongly and now literally changing what I have said. I did not say "defective". You are misquoting me horribly. I was NOT comparing religious belief to mental health issues. I was comparing the feeling. Insults are taken not given. So no it's not an insult unless you misunderstand it and wish to take it as such. I'm not responsible for your misunderstanding. You are literally changing my words. YOU just likened people with mental health issues as nutters. YOU just did that, not me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And you have heavily, heavily insinuated most of those things I've suggested in various posts on this thread. Except I'd add a few more heavilies and a very or four. I think the OP believes he is being a lot more subtle than is actually the case." I'm not trying to be "subtle" or anything like that. I think you are projecting your your misunderstandings on to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"was it John Lennon who said, 'whatever gets you through your night, is alright'..? . Yeah he was talking about barbiturates that he was addicted to at the time though " oh you cynic.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"was it John Lennon who said, 'whatever gets you through your night, is alright'..? " . Yeah he was talking about barbiturates that he was addicted to at the time though ... Me a cynic .. Were you thinking of mind games perhaps | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |