FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > 24 hrs notive brfore having sex or prison ?????

24 hrs notive brfore having sex or prison ?????

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *eavenNhell OP   Couple  over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge

heard on the news today of a man in his forty's who must inform the police of his intent to start sexual activity's with a female so that they can approach her with details of his past . failure by him to comply will trigger immediate imprisonment .

the man had recently been cleared of a rape charge

thoughts

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *artytwoCouple  over a year ago

Wolverhampton

How could they find out if he did? Is he allowed a wank?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *eavenNhell OP   Couple  over a year ago

carrbrook stalybridge


"heard on the news today of a man in his forty's who must inform the police of his intent to start sexual activity's with a female so that they can approach her with details of his past . failure by him to comply will trigger immediate imprisonment .

the man had recently been cleared of a rape charge

thoughts "

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-35385227

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

heard it also it does seem a bit weird, either he was cleared of the allegation or he was guilty in which case he would be on the sex offenders register..

but does someone who is on the register also have to comply with similar rules..?

not sure about the whole thing ..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I saw this on the mail site before seems like half a story to me somethings missing if he was cleared then this is a breach of human rights

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It would certainly cut down on the guys here sending 'fancy a fuck right now' messages

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inky-MinxWoman  over a year ago

Grantham


"I saw this on the mail site before seems like half a story to me somethings missing if he was cleared then this is a breach of human rights"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Does seem weird, either he is guilty or he isn't, there is no grey area. according to the story, the cops can decide to push this onto someone if they think he might be a danger. I think this is a get out clause, the cops or prosecution screwed up the investigation somehow, he is guilty but because of some stupid technicality he got to walk. I don't think they would use this lightly though.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I saw this on the mail site before seems like half a story to me somethings missing if he was cleared then this is a breach of human rights"

this x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *enard ArgenteMan  over a year ago

London and France

Then there is another part of the story ;

Perhaps he has a number of previous convictions, and is considered a risk .....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Why would we assume they screwed up. We had a family member killed by a guy. the police knew he done it but the crime persecution service wouldn't allow the police to charge him with her death on lack of concrete evidence and the guy walked

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *icecouple561Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

He also has to provide the woman's date of birth, that might be a clue as to why this has been put in place.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Makes you think how many sex offenders are on fab and how many attend clubs

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inky-MinxWoman  over a year ago

Grantham

It's not as difficult as you think to get on the SO register.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

There is more to this than is being reported

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

this could lead to lot of police man hours being wasted

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *erbyDalesCplCouple  over a year ago

Derbyshire


"heard on the news today of a man in his forty's who must inform the police of his intent to start sexual activity's with a female so that they can approach her with details of his past . failure by him to comply will trigger immediate imprisonment .

the man had recently been cleared of a rape charge

thoughts "

I've been saving this thread since I thought it was going to be one of your jokes.

Where did it say "so they can approach her with details of his past"? Without that, and coupled with his name being withheld, makes me wonder if he isn't a vulnerable adult himself with learning difficulties, and the order isn't trying to discourage him from having sex. Definitely a pertinent detail missing from the story, meaning it will be over-hyped by all and sundry. I'll stick with 'I trust the justice system, acting on all the facts, to deal with it properly'.

(Or blame government cuts?)

Mr ddc

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The story is far too vague to form an opinion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

hmmm never heard this before - doesnt seem like the whole story has been told

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *uv a sukMan  over a year ago

yorkshire

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Why would we assume they screwed up. We had a family member killed by a guy. the police knew he done it but the crime persecution service wouldn't allow the police to charge him with her death on lack of concrete evidence and the guy walked"

Sorry that you lost a loved one, but I do not think we should start convicting people without concrete evidence.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's only for a period of 4 months! Bit of a mood killer but not that difficult really. It makes sense; if he's a serial offender (i.e hes got a mental problem) then he won't last 4 months and he'll get locked up for longer than he otherwise would have. If nothing goes wrong in 4 months then he probably doesn't have a problem.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0155

0