FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Legal advice dept bayliffs advice
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"LAA advised a collection agentancy to bill me. Due to finacial onbigations i cannot pay full amount and am trying arrange a payment plan and have paid some money but tgey have dismissed my offer and im now completing means form. I was not told i would be billed but the bill is genuine seens a miss under standing on my part although was not billed for nearly 6 months. Even though im making payment and said I will pay no arguments just need time to sell car they have sent me a seven day notice threating to sieze goods. As i understand it No entry mean no sieze in house and certificate is needed. My car is parked on private land, I do not own. So they cant touch that and again a certificate is needed. As its a CCO they cannot charge me fees. I also offered them to place a charge on property for a small fee. Am i correct about certificates Am i right about no entry mo sieze Am i right about car on private land car cannot be taken. Cheers. Just need to buy some time without loosing anything Cheers" What's a CCO? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Get to the Citizens Advice, or similar, asap on Monday. " This, plus you can a lot of information from the website. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Get to the Citizens Advice, or similar, asap on Monday. This, plus you can a lot of information from the website." Download form malg1 from debt and ,mental health , See doctor, say depressed because of debts etc get him to fill in form When bailiffs turn up . Give it to them through the letter box All done no worries and referred back to the person you owe money to Bailiffs can't collect when presented with malg1 as it makes you a vulnerable adult . | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Cco county cort order " Read what I wrote and Google this exactly Bailiffs and vulnerable households | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Cco county cort order " Sure your not thinking of CCJ = county court judgement??? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, I work in a court so if you want to PM me, I'll try and help. And I have NEVER seen one of these MALG forms used ever." MALG is a group, not a form. He means a DMHEF and consent form, which just means they're affected by mental illness. I don't know why someone would claim this, OP seems to understand the debt. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"And they don't need to notify you that they taking it to high court .. .. .. they get the writ and turn up without any notification to you .. " The sheriffs are coming | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Anal pounder 2016 U clearly have no understanding of , so called , "debt". All (so called) "debts" , in the uk are fraudulent. I realise this may come as a shock , but they do not need to be repaid!!... Unless , of course , you , choose 2 CONTRACT ." You sound very knowledgeable. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"LAA advised a collection agentancy to bill me. Due to finacial onbigations i cannot pay full amount and am trying arrange a payment plan and have paid some money but tgey have dismissed my offer and im now completing means form. I was not told i would be billed but the bill is genuine seens a miss under standing on my part although was not billed for nearly 6 months. Even though im making payment and said I will pay no arguments just need time to sell car they have sent me a seven day notice threating to sieze goods. As i understand it No entry mean no sieze in house and certificate is needed. My car is parked on private land, I do not own. So they cant touch that and again a certificate is needed. As its a CCO they cannot charge me fees. I also offered them to place a charge on property for a small fee. Am i correct about certificates Am i right about no entry mo sieze Am i right about car on private land car cannot be taken. Cheers. Just need to buy some time without loosing anything Cheers" 1. Bailiffs do not have to accept the offer you make if it's seen as unreasonable 2. Bailiffs cannot force entry into your house 3. Bailiffs can only cease goods if they have been into the property previously and put a levy on goods 4. Bailiffs can remove a vehicle regardless of where it's parked 5. Bailiffs can take anything other than essential items, work tools or things belonging to others but the onus is on you to prove ownership 6. Get advice as every stage the move to increased costs massively Hope this helps from an ex bailiff!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Do not CONTRACT with them" They owe money. You're telling them to steal. Everyone should pay what they owe. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like many "sheeple" you choose to live your life with your eyes wide shut , & that is your decision! Personally I prefer my eyes wide open , that way I can see whats going on , & where I'm going! " You live with your eyes wide open... yet you're unable to see that reply quote button which would make it a lot easier to see who you're talking to... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Anal Pounder2016. All "money" is a fraud. All "debt" is a fraud. The only person you are "stealing" from is yourself! , that is , if you accept your Legal Fiction! This may come as a shock to you , but when you enter into a "credit" or "loan" arrangement your actually "borrowing" the money from yourself!!! Pesonally , I am no bodied Strawman. You only accept your Legal Fiction , if YOU choose to CONTRACT. " Straw man stuff is bollocks for irresponsible people. You buy into capitalism (you at least own a phone, you pay to attend swinging clubs, you use the Internet), you have to pay for it. Don't be a hypocrite. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An ex had debt probs, all sorted through Gregory Pennington, Google for number, small fee through the payments collected but they deal with everything and it was a lifesaver for him, worth looking up x" However there are organisations that don't charge like Step Change and they deal with all your debts not just some as I was once paying a debt company and pulled out of them | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like many "sheeple" you choose to live your life with your eyes wide shut , & that is your decision! Personally I prefer my eyes wide open , that way I can see whats going on , & where I'm going! " If you rented a property from me and caused me hardship through non payment of rent... cos let's face it that would be my bread and butter.. I'd set fire to your straw bollocks. 1. Pay people for what you take from them. 2. Go and live on an uninhabited island and fish for coconuts..... Those are your two options. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Well plenty off replies nice debate. I trying to come to an arrangment. But need a reply from the about a question i have Legal aid agency do not collect them selfs it goes straight to rosendales to recover monies. Cab website says the cannot touch car unless on public highway or my property. CCO. Capital Contribution order. Rules where breached as apparently i should have recieved a notice with 21 days to appeal the descision this did not happen.. if id had known about bill before 20th december i could have paid without batting an eyelid but i lent my brother money and bought my sister inlaw a car. Got the letter 3 days later " Just a point of interest , as I cannot work it out. How do you get a debt without knowing? It's an honest Q..... How does that happen ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Well plenty off replies nice debate. I trying to come to an arrangment. But need a reply from the about a question i have Legal aid agency do not collect them selfs it goes straight to rosendales to recover monies. Cab website says the cannot touch car unless on public highway or my property. CCO. Capital Contribution order. Rules where breached as apparently i should have recieved a notice with 21 days to appeal the descision this did not happen.. if id had known about bill before 20th december i could have paid without batting an eyelid but i lent my brother money and bought my sister inlaw a car. Got the letter 3 days later " You must be loaded. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Well plenty off replies nice debate. I trying to come to an arrangment. But need a reply from the about a question i have Legal aid agency do not collect them selfs it goes straight to rosendales to recover monies. Cab website says the cannot touch car unless on public highway or my property. CCO. Capital Contribution order. Rules where breached as apparently i should have recieved a notice with 21 days to appeal the descision this did not happen.. if id had known about bill before 20th december i could have paid without batting an eyelid but i lent my brother money and bought my sister inlaw a car. Got the letter 3 days later Just a point of interest , as I cannot work it out. How do you get a debt without knowing? It's an honest Q..... How does that happen ?" the solicitor said i qaulified for frew legal aid at crown court but not crown court. I went crown court was not asked for a penny or given any bills. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Anal pounder 2016 U clearly have no understanding of , so called , "debt". All (so called) "debts" , in the uk are fraudulent. I realise this may come as a shock , but they do not need to be repaid!!... Unless , of course , you , choose 2 CONTRACT ." Erm.... I'm a debt collector & take people to Court to obtain CCJ's for non-payment of debts whether contractual or not. There are different types of debts & different laws covering them | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddc" yep my solicitors where fing usless. I dis not recieve a CCO so had not option to appeal or to know to pay. My sister in law crashed her car and lives day to day. Car i bought saved her monthly amounts on insurance so is slowly paying me back. Bro paying me back but tgats not enough. All im asking them for is a chance to get cash together. Took them nearly 6 months to charge me. Would be nice to have a few months to pay it the bill. Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If they have a high court writ they can seize anything. So as long as it doesn't go to high court then they can't take anything off you without the correct paperwork. I would still recommend, like the previous posters, to speak to citizens advice or the likes of and get all the facts on it. " I'm sorry but this is incorrect, they cannot seize items necessary for work or items you do not own | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. " will they lend with defaults | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If the people owed take it to crown court then baliffs can effect full access order to property where ever it is ... ie car on private land etc is still up for grabs ... and can enter property to seize goods if your there on premises or not ... ... " Again wrong, Crown Court is for criminal matters. This is a civil matter. Please be more careful concerning the advice you give | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"U need 2 check - www.get out of debt free.org Remember as your "debt" has been sold on to another agency the original debt has been repaid. As such, legally your in the clear. From now on its purely "procedural". Remeber, under NO circumstances, you must not CONTRACT with debt collection agencies. HF66." Again wrong. You can assign a debt or legal action as if it was an asset and that then makes the entity buying the same legally entitled to enforce. It can be alleged to be void on the grounds of champerty but this is very draconian | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An ex had debt probs, all sorted through Gregory Pennington, Google for number, small fee through the payments collected but they deal with everything and it was a lifesaver for him, worth looking up x" didn't know they were still going....I used to work for them years ago | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddcyep my solicitors where fing usless. I dis not recieve a CCO so had not option to appeal or to know to pay. My sister in law crashed her car and lives day to day. Car i bought saved her monthly amounts on insurance so is slowly paying me back. Bro paying me back but tgats not enough. All im asking them for is a chance to get cash together. Took them nearly 6 months to charge me. Would be nice to have a few months to pay it the bill. Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. " It sounds like you just managed your money poorly. Why didn't you pay legal aid bills from the start of the case? Usually solicitors will file for support when taking you on as a client. Perhaps reach out to them for help, unless the relationship is too damaged by refusal to pay fees. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There are two sorts of debt, priority and non priority. Money owed to the state, for a mortgage, for a secured loan, are priority debts, no getting away from them short of bankruptcy. Non priority debts are in effect unenforceable, write to each lender and offer them each £1 a week, and PAY IT, never default on this payment. " Again this is incorrect. There is such a thing as secured and non secured creditors but this does not mean unsecured creditors cannot enforce | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Do not CONTRACT with them" Its not a contract | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddc" Whilst I agree the OP should seek independent advice concerning the advice received, negligent advise of the solicitor will not negate the obligation to pay. Assuming the advice was incorrect, it would lead to a professional negligence action. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"LAA advised a collection agentancy to bill me. Due to finacial onbigations i cannot pay full amount and am trying arrange a payment plan and have paid some money but tgey have dismissed my offer and im now completing means form. I was not told i would be billed but the bill is genuine seens a miss under standing on my part although was not billed for nearly 6 months. Even though im making payment and said I will pay no arguments just need time to sell car they have sent me a seven day notice threating to sieze goods. As i understand it No entry mean no sieze in house and certificate is needed. My car is parked on private land, I do not own. So they cant touch that and again a certificate is needed. As its a CCO they cannot charge me fees. I also offered them to place a charge on property for a small fee. Am i correct about certificates Am i right about no entry mo sieze Am i right about car on private land car cannot be taken. Cheers. Just need to buy some time without loosing anything Cheers" OP, If you would like some assistance, please PM and I will do what I can. I am afraid a lot of what has been written here is nonsense. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Mr ddc Whilst I agree the OP should seek independent advice concerning the advice received, negligent advise of the solicitor will not negate the obligation to pay. Assuming the advice was incorrect, it would lead to a professional negligence action. " You see, I DON'T think it is worth the OP seeking additional independent advice at yet more cost. There seems to be a misunderstanding about whether the court has followed procedures correctly, but almost certainly they have. If their solicitor gave them bad advice, there is a chance that rather than risk a claim of negligence, they may help the OP buy some time as a gesture of goodwill. More probably though they will explain the OP is best to pay the costs asap, which, imho, is what the OP needs to hear rather than pie in the sky schemes that ultimately will not work, and add to the costs they will ultimately have to pay. OP: You say you can arrange a loan, this is definitely your cheapest course of action. Clear the debt, put it behind you, and move on with your life/lives | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Mr ddc Whilst I agree the OP should seek independent advice concerning the advice received, negligent advise of the solicitor will not negate the obligation to pay. Assuming the advice was incorrect, it would lead to a professional negligence action. You see, I DON'T think it is worth the OP seeking additional independent advice at yet more cost. There seems to be a misunderstanding about whether the court has followed procedures correctly, but almost certainly they have. If their solicitor gave them bad advice, there is a chance that rather than risk a claim of negligence, they may help the OP buy some time as a gesture of goodwill. More probably though they will explain the OP is best to pay the costs asap, which, imho, is what the OP needs to hear rather than pie in the sky schemes that ultimately will not work, and add to the costs they will ultimately have to pay. OP: You say you can arrange a loan, this is definitely your cheapest course of action. Clear the debt, put it behind you, and move on with your life/lives" Whilst it is by no means certain that there has been professional negligence , if there has then it is possible the prof neg claim can be pursued on a 'no win, no fee' basis with the only cost to the OP being a percentage of the damages. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Mr ddc Whilst I agree the OP should seek independent advice concerning the advice received, negligent advise of the solicitor will not negate the obligation to pay. Assuming the advice was incorrect, it would lead to a professional negligence action. You see, I DON'T think it is worth the OP seeking additional independent advice at yet more cost. There seems to be a misunderstanding about whether the court has followed procedures correctly, but almost certainly they have. If their solicitor gave them bad advice, there is a chance that rather than risk a claim of negligence, they may help the OP buy some time as a gesture of goodwill. More probably though they will explain the OP is best to pay the costs asap, which, imho, is what the OP needs to hear rather than pie in the sky schemes that ultimately will not work, and add to the costs they will ultimately have to pay. OP: You say you can arrange a loan, this is definitely your cheapest course of action. Clear the debt, put it behind you, and move on with your life/lives" He really ought to pay what he owes. And stop buying unnecessary stuff for other people when in debt. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I haven't read the whole Thread so forgive me if I repeat what has been said. Firstly only a Court (High Court or Magistrates Court) can issue a Distress Warrant or order Bailiffs to collect any monies. There is no 'CCO' it is a County Court Judgment' and on its own does no more than damage your credit standing. (after a period of time). However once a CCJ is issued the Plaintiff can go to Court and ask for a Distress Warrant. But the OP will be notified and can attend. Basically the time to have made an offer is at the Court hearing where the CCJ was issued. The Court can agree a payment schedule for the debt but it will (normally) still issue a CCJ. That in itself does not mean any Bailiffs can be used. If the Op fails to pay as agreed by the Court the Plaintiff will go back and apply for a Distress Warrant as above. The OP should not kid himself the Bailiffs can't touch anything. They can. But only a High Court Bailiff can force entry to a property with no resorting to Police attendance. Bailiffs do however accept a payment schedule over a period of time as they prefer payment to seizure ... Hope this helps ..." A CCO is something completely different to a CCJ. It's to do with legal aid apparently. And it's called a Warrant of Control, not a distress warrant. It used to be known as a Warrant of Execution | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Mr ddc Whilst I agree the OP should seek independent advice concerning the advice received, negligent advise of the solicitor will not negate the obligation to pay. Assuming the advice was incorrect, it would lead to a professional negligence action. You see, I DON'T think it is worth the OP seeking additional independent advice at yet more cost. There seems to be a misunderstanding about whether the court has followed procedures correctly, but almost certainly they have. If their solicitor gave them bad advice, there is a chance that rather than risk a claim of negligence, they may help the OP buy some time as a gesture of goodwill. More probably though they will explain the OP is best to pay the costs asap, which, imho, is what the OP needs to hear rather than pie in the sky schemes that ultimately will not work, and add to the costs they will ultimately have to pay. OP: You say you can arrange a loan, this is definitely your cheapest course of action. Clear the debt, put it behind you, and move on with your life/lives He really ought to pay what he owes. And stop buying unnecessary stuff for other people when in debt. " i didnt have any dept at twat. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddcyep my solicitors where fing usless. I dis not recieve a CCO so had not option to appeal or to know to pay. My sister in law crashed her car and lives day to day. Car i bought saved her monthly amounts on insurance so is slowly paying me back. Bro paying me back but tgats not enough. All im asking them for is a chance to get cash together. Took them nearly 6 months to charge me. Would be nice to have a few months to pay it the bill. Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. It sounds like you just managed your money poorly. Why didn't you pay legal aid bills from the start of the case? Usually solicitors will file for support when taking you on as a client. Perhaps reach out to them for help, unless the relationship is too damaged by refusal to pay fees. " they never asked me for money nore did they ever bill me. If they had i would gave paid for a specialist solicitor and barrister. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" He really ought to pay what he owes. And stop buying unnecessary stuff for other people when in debt. i didnt have any dept at twat." What? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. will they lend with defaults" there is mo defaults. At present. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddcyep my solicitors where fing usless. I dis not recieve a CCO so had not option to appeal or to know to pay. My sister in law crashed her car and lives day to day. Car i bought saved her monthly amounts on insurance so is slowly paying me back. Bro paying me back but tgats not enough. All im asking them for is a chance to get cash together. Took them nearly 6 months to charge me. Would be nice to have a few months to pay it the bill. Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. It sounds like you just managed your money poorly. Why didn't you pay legal aid bills from the start of the case? Usually solicitors will file for support when taking you on as a client. Perhaps reach out to them for help, unless the relationship is too damaged by refusal to pay fees. they never asked me for money nore did they ever bill me. If they had i would gave paid for a specialist solicitor and barrister. " Were you given the choice of where to have your trial? Did they advise you to go to Crown Court knowing you'd plead guilty? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"LAA advised a collection agentancy to bill me. Due to finacial onbigations i cannot pay full amount and am trying arrange a payment plan and have paid some money but tgey have dismissed my offer and im now completing means form. I was not told i would be billed but the bill is genuine seens a miss under standing on my part although was not billed for nearly 6 months. Even though im making payment and said I will pay no arguments just need time to sell car they have sent me a seven day notice threating to sieze goods. As i understand it No entry mean no sieze in house and certificate is needed. My car is parked on private land, I do not own. So they cant touch that and again a certificate is needed. As its a CCO they cannot charge me fees. I also offered them to place a charge on property for a small fee. Am i correct about certificates Am i right about no entry mo sieze Am i right about car on private land car cannot be taken. Cheers. Just need to buy some time without loosing anything Cheers What's a CCO? " County Court Order | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Anal Pounder2016. All "money" is a fraud. All "debt" is a fraud. The only person you are "stealing" from is yourself! , that is , if you accept your Legal Fiction! This may come as a shock to you , but when you enter into a "credit" or "loan" arrangement your actually "borrowing" the money from yourself!!! Pesonally , I am no bodied Strawman. You only accept your Legal Fiction , if YOU choose to CONTRACT. " Could you tell us what we should do rather than just telling us that we should not CONTRACT, whatever that may mean. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish I knew all of the details for this situation. It's driving me mad wondering how it could've ended up going to a collection agency, with the OP having no knowledge whatsoever. " (Read the link I posted. That makes it pretty clear) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish I knew all of the details for this situation. It's driving me mad wondering how it could've ended up going to a collection agency, with the OP having no knowledge whatsoever. (Read the link I posted. That makes it pretty clear)" Funny timing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed" Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay " Gov one is ok | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay " That link still assumes the OP filled in forms and had knowledge of potential Legal Aid contributions. Plus I know they request payment up front and refund if found not guilty after the trial. I dunno how the OP got away with paying nothing and still being represented. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay Gov one is ok " Phew, ty (I need a 'wipes sweat from brow' emoji.) As always, my timing could not be more embarrassing | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay That link still assumes the OP filled in forms and had knowledge of potential Legal Aid contributions. Plus I know they request payment up front and refund if found not guilty after the trial. I dunno how the OP got away with paying nothing and still being represented. " solicitor said it was granted. Said if it wasnt id have to pay £900 a month. But as granted not to worry. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay That link still assumes the OP filled in forms and had knowledge of potential Legal Aid contributions. Plus I know they request payment up front and refund if found not guilty after the trial. I dunno how the OP got away with paying nothing and still being represented. solicitor said it was granted. Said if it wasnt id have to pay £900 a month. But as granted not to worry. " Legal Aid write to you as well though, and also send you contribution notices. How come you didn't receive any correspondence? If you genuinely didn't receive any letters directly from them (and you gave your correct details on the form), they may be more willing to help you. Also, £900 per contribution is about right for a crown court case. It's usually at least a few hundred each time for those who have to pay. It's means tested. If you willingly ignored requests to pay, they clearly won't be interested in helping. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay That link still assumes the OP filled in forms and had knowledge of potential Legal Aid contributions. Plus I know they request payment up front and refund if found not guilty after the trial. I dunno how the OP got away with paying nothing and still being represented. " Are you not confusing a Representation Order, or a Contribution Order with a Capital Contribution Order? Is not a CCO only made only at sentencing stage, while the other two (as you say) happen before trial? That's how I read it. Either way how we came to be here is academic tbh | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddcyep my solicitors where fing usless. I dis not recieve a CCO so had not option to appeal or to know to pay. My sister in law crashed her car and lives day to day. Car i bought saved her monthly amounts on insurance so is slowly paying me back. Bro paying me back but tgats not enough. All im asking them for is a chance to get cash together. Took them nearly 6 months to charge me. Would be nice to have a few months to pay it the bill. Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. It sounds like you just managed your money poorly. Why didn't you pay legal aid bills from the start of the case? Usually solicitors will file for support when taking you on as a client. Perhaps reach out to them for help, unless the relationship is too damaged by refusal to pay fees. they never asked me for money nore did they ever bill me. If they had i would gave paid for a specialist solicitor and barrister. Were you given the choice of where to have your trial? Did they advise you to go to Crown Court knowing you'd plead guilty?" no choice but to go crown and police gained evidence but also my defence evidence and solicitor should obtained my goods back so I Could defend. It wasnt till two week after case I found out they had no evidence for a charge bought against me. But I Did a deal to end the procedings that day to get it all over and done with. Solicitor should have got my goods back as police. See useless. I was supposed to be pleading not guilty to charges but as said did a deal to get it over and done with. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay That link still assumes the OP filled in forms and had knowledge of potential Legal Aid contributions. Plus I know they request payment up front and refund if found not guilty after the trial. I dunno how the OP got away with paying nothing and still being represented. Are you not confusing a Representation Order, or a Contribution Order with a Capital Contribution Order? Is not a CCO only made only at sentencing stage, while the other two (as you say) happen before trial? That's how I read it. Either way how we came to be here is academic tbh " Letter says Cco capitail contribution order | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"LAA advised a collection agentancy to bill me. Due to finacial onbigations i cannot pay full amount and am trying arrange a payment plan and have paid some money but tgey have dismissed my offer and im now completing means form. I was not told i would be billed but the bill is genuine seens a miss under standing on my part although was not billed for nearly 6 months. Even though im making payment and said I will pay no arguments just need time to sell car they have sent me a seven day notice threating to sieze goods. As i understand it No entry mean no sieze in house and certificate is needed. My car is parked on private land, I do not own. So they cant touch that and again a certificate is needed. As its a CCO they cannot charge me fees. I also offered them to place a charge on property for a small fee. Am i correct about certificates Am i right about no entry mo sieze Am i right about car on private land car cannot be taken. Cheers. Just need to buy some time without loosing anything Cheers What's a CCO? County Court Order" The OP has already said its a Capital Contribution Order. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay That link still assumes the OP filled in forms and had knowledge of potential Legal Aid contributions. Plus I know they request payment up front and refund if found not guilty after the trial. I dunno how the OP got away with paying nothing and still being represented. Are you not confusing a Representation Order, or a Contribution Order with a Capital Contribution Order? Is not a CCO only made only at sentencing stage, while the other two (as you say) happen before trial? That's how I read it. Either way how we came to be here is academic tbh " Wasn't talking about either of those really, more that when you instruct a lawyer and apply for legal aid, you're sent a bunch of forms that you send back to LAA. They then write to you and tell you how much you have to contribute in terms of legal aid fees. This all happens even before trials begin, you're forced to pay and then claim it back after if you've overpaid. I dunno how OP missed out on this initial step. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I know people are trying to be helpful but please stop putting links in that are not allowed Oops, sorry if that was my one, I thought a .gov one would be okay That link still assumes the OP filled in forms and had knowledge of potential Legal Aid contributions. Plus I know they request payment up front and refund if found not guilty after the trial. I dunno how the OP got away with paying nothing and still being represented. solicitor said it was granted. Said if it wasnt id have to pay £900 a month. But as granted not to worry. Legal Aid write to you as well though, and also send you contribution notices. How come you didn't receive any correspondence? If you genuinely didn't receive any letters directly from them (and you gave your correct details on the form), they may be more willing to help you. Also, £900 per contribution is about right for a crown court case. It's usually at least a few hundred each time for those who have to pay. It's means tested. If you willingly ignored requests to pay, they clearly won't be interested in helping. " first thing i recieved was 16th dec from rossendails. LAA told me they do not collect direct it goes straight to Rosendales to collect. Have that in writting from LAA after i queried. Amount why so long and why rosendails collecting | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddcyep my solicitors where fing usless. I dis not recieve a CCO so had not option to appeal or to know to pay. My sister in law crashed her car and lives day to day. Car i bought saved her monthly amounts on insurance so is slowly paying me back. Bro paying me back but tgats not enough. All im asking them for is a chance to get cash together. Took them nearly 6 months to charge me. Would be nice to have a few months to pay it the bill. Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. It sounds like you just managed your money poorly. Why didn't you pay legal aid bills from the start of the case? Usually solicitors will file for support when taking you on as a client. Perhaps reach out to them for help, unless the relationship is too damaged by refusal to pay fees. they never asked me for money nore did they ever bill me. If they had i would gave paid for a specialist solicitor and barrister. Were you given the choice of where to have your trial? Did they advise you to go to Crown Court knowing you'd plead guilty? no choice but to go crown and police gained evidence but also my defence evidence and solicitor should obtained my goods back so I Could defend. It wasnt till two week after case I found out they had no evidence for a charge bought against me. But I Did a deal to end the procedings that day to get it all over and done with. Solicitor should have got my goods back as police. See useless. I was supposed to be pleading not guilty to charges but as said did a deal to get it over and done with. " This all sounds so dodgy. You don't just "do deals". If they had no evidence, you wouldn't have been charged by the CPS. It maybe just wasn't enough to win the case. I don't know how you signed legal aid forms and they didn't get back in touch with you, like they do with everyone else that uses them. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"LAA advised a collection agentancy to bill me. Due to finacial onbigations i cannot pay full amount and am trying arrange a payment plan and have paid some money but tgey have dismissed my offer and im now completing means form. I was not told i would be billed but the bill is genuine seens a miss under standing on my part although was not billed for nearly 6 months. Even though im making payment and said I will pay no arguments just need time to sell car they have sent me a seven day notice threating to sieze goods. As i understand it No entry mean no sieze in house and certificate is needed. My car is parked on private land, I do not own. So they cant touch that and again a certificate is needed. As its a CCO they cannot charge me fees. I also offered them to place a charge on property for a small fee. Am i correct about certificates Am i right about no entry mo sieze Am i right about car on private land car cannot be taken. Cheers. Just need to buy some time without loosing anything Cheers What's a CCO? County Court Order" Looks like I got this one wrong. It's actually Capital Contribution order. These are relatively new (2009) and are delt with quite differently than most normal debts. Shrewman seems to know his stuff. I'd follow his advice if I was the OP. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"LAA advised a collection agentancy to bill me. Due to finacial onbigations i cannot pay full amount and am trying arrange a payment plan and have paid some money but tgey have dismissed my offer and im now completing means form. I was not told i would be billed but the bill is genuine seens a miss under standing on my part although was not billed for nearly 6 months. Even though im making payment and said I will pay no arguments just need time to sell car they have sent me a seven day notice threating to sieze goods. As i understand it No entry mean no sieze in house and certificate is needed. My car is parked on private land, I do not own. So they cant touch that and again a certificate is needed. As its a CCO they cannot charge me fees. I also offered them to place a charge on property for a small fee. Am i correct about certificates Am i right about no entry mo sieze Am i right about car on private land car cannot be taken. Cheers. Just need to buy some time without loosing anything Cheers What's a CCO? County Court Order The OP has already said its a Capital Contribution Order." I know but I hadn't read that far yet. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"OP, you need to try to speak to the solicitor who represented you originally. They should have made it clear the implications of you pleading 'not guilty', taking it to court and losing. The CCO surely would have been made at sentencing and your 21 days to appeal was from this date. You say you 'misunderstood' something, so it sounds like the proper procedure was followed, but you weren't aware of the implications, and didn't appeal in time. Your solicitor should have advised you about all this. Sadly I suspect that by giving a sum of money to your brother, and buying your sister-in-law a car, the court may feel that you have deliberately tried to dispose of assets and consequently show little willingness to compromise. Almost certainly your solicitor will tell you to get the money you require back from your brother and/or sister-in-law and pay the court. Mr ddcyep my solicitors where fing usless. I dis not recieve a CCO so had not option to appeal or to know to pay. My sister in law crashed her car and lives day to day. Car i bought saved her monthly amounts on insurance so is slowly paying me back. Bro paying me back but tgats not enough. All im asking them for is a chance to get cash together. Took them nearly 6 months to charge me. Would be nice to have a few months to pay it the bill. Looking like trip to bank for 7.5k loan at least get a cheap 3.6% loan. It sounds like you just managed your money poorly. Why didn't you pay legal aid bills from the start of the case? Usually solicitors will file for support when taking you on as a client. Perhaps reach out to them for help, unless the relationship is too damaged by refusal to pay fees. they never asked me for money nore did they ever bill me. If they had i would gave paid for a specialist solicitor and barrister. Were you given the choice of where to have your trial? Did they advise you to go to Crown Court knowing you'd plead guilty? no choice but to go crown and police gained evidence but also my defence evidence and solicitor should obtained my goods back so I Could defend. It wasnt till two week after case I found out they had no evidence for a charge bought against me. But I Did a deal to end the procedings that day to get it all over and done with. Solicitor should have got my goods back as police. See useless. I was supposed to be pleading not guilty to charges but as said did a deal to get it over and done with. This all sounds so dodgy. You don't just "do deals". If they had no evidence, you wouldn't have been charged by the CPS. It maybe just wasn't enough to win the case. I don't know how you signed legal aid forms and they didn't get back in touch with you, like they do with everyone else that uses them. " the evidence was a 3 second gap it cctv footage where the harddrive deletes a chapter then starts re recording. Dvr instructions state this. But i didnt know what there evidence was till i figured it out after getting dvr ect back. They had a case but I had instructions to discredit. At time off going into court i did not know what evidence was. I still dont know if that was what they wherw classing as evidence though lol. Just guessing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"My point was that if they somehow missed the initial billings, they may be more lenient with your repayments (if you can prove they had your contact details and didn't send you any info). I've explained the typical billing procedure above, if this wasn't the case with you, then you may be able to request leniency from the creditors. Also, saying "I wouldn't have pleaded guilty if I knew they didn't have proper evidence of me doing that illegal thing" isn't grounds for an appeal. It makes me think you knew they had your number, and cut your losses - but that's besides the point. " ill bring that up thanks. That i never recieved the paperwork with oportunity to appeal. Tell them i writing a complaint to the commision. Put your self in my position. I knew the charge. But did not know if I had made a mistake or not. I could not check to find out as police had siezed it. Faced with a 17 year prison sentance i agreed to plead guilty to charges of another offence and take minium sentence and cost. Hopeing it could all be put behind. I had a bloody good defence that would have basicually got me off. Statements evidence witnesses. But not knowing if made a mistake leaving evidence of offence police said i commited. Wasnt willing to chance it. I was brought down by a criminal scum bag that prevoked me and as i said to police i did not feel threatened or intimdated by this violent crimals actions, off criminal damage to vehicle i was in and threating me with baseball bat. I say violant crimal cause he has a wrap sheet as long as his arm. Police i dare say racist sgt took a special disliking to me. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"My point was that if they somehow missed the initial billings, they may be more lenient with your repayments (if you can prove they had your contact details and didn't send you any info). I've explained the typical billing procedure above, if this wasn't the case with you, then you may be able to request leniency from the creditors. Also, saying "I wouldn't have pleaded guilty if I knew they didn't have proper evidence of me doing that illegal thing" isn't grounds for an appeal. It makes me think you knew they had your number, and cut your losses - but that's besides the point. ill bring that up thanks. That i never recieved the paperwork with oportunity to appeal. Tell them i writing a complaint to the commision. Put your self in my position. I knew the charge. But did not know if I had made a mistake or not. I could not check to find out as police had siezed it. Faced with a 17 year prison sentance i agreed to plead guilty to charges of another offence and take minium sentence and cost. Hopeing it could all be put behind. I had a bloody good defence that would have basicually got me off. Statements evidence witnesses. But not knowing if made a mistake leaving evidence of offence police said i commited. Wasnt willing to chance it. I was brought down by a criminal scum bag that prevoked me and as i said to police i did not feel threatened or intimdated by this violent crimals actions, off criminal damage to vehicle i was in and threating me with baseball bat. I say violant crimal cause he has a wrap sheet as long as his arm. Police i dare say racist sgt took a special disliking to me. " The details of the case don't really matter, and you shouldn't give too much information away about yourself online. All that matters now is that you have been convicted so you therefore owe the costs. They will not be written off, unless you can prove hardship. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Police i dare say racist sgt took a special disliking to me. " ill add i was also arrested 6 months later by same sgt one more offenses. Only to be released without charge as there was no evidence and he hedged his bets by asking unrelated question about other charges. I wasnt taking his shit this time though. He already had to drop 2 charges from prior arrest both of which where not upholdable. I c a meduim a couple off months ago. He told me im a marked man and an person in a position of power has it in for me. 3 times ive been stopped by police 2 where ok. 1 was a complete arse. He was man enough to ring me after and opologise and destroy the court summons as he had made a mistake and i was not doing anything illigal i did qoute laws at time of being detained. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"My point was that if they somehow missed the initial billings, they may be more lenient with your repayments (if you can prove they had your contact details and didn't send you any info). I've explained the typical billing procedure above, if this wasn't the case with you, then you may be able to request leniency from the creditors. Also, saying "I wouldn't have pleaded guilty if I knew they didn't have proper evidence of me doing that illegal thing" isn't grounds for an appeal. It makes me think you knew they had your number, and cut your losses - but that's besides the point. ill bring that up thanks. That i never recieved the paperwork with oportunity to appeal. Tell them i writing a complaint to the commision. Put your self in my position. I knew the charge. But did not know if I had made a mistake or not. I could not check to find out as police had siezed it. Faced with a 17 year prison sentance i agreed to plead guilty to charges of another offence and take minium sentence and cost. Hopeing it could all be put behind. I had a bloody good defence that would have basicually got me off. Statements evidence witnesses. But not knowing if made a mistake leaving evidence of offence police said i commited. Wasnt willing to chance it. I was brought down by a criminal scum bag that prevoked me and as i said to police i did not feel threatened or intimdated by this violent crimals actions, off criminal damage to vehicle i was in and threating me with baseball bat. I say violant crimal cause he has a wrap sheet as long as his arm. Police i dare say racist sgt took a special disliking to me. The details of the case don't really matter, and you shouldn't give too much information away about yourself online. All that matters now is that you have been convicted so you therefore owe the costs. They will not be written off, unless you can prove hardship. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"My point was that if they somehow missed the initial billings, they may be more lenient with your repayments (if you can prove they had your contact details and didn't send you any info). I've explained the typical billing procedure above, if this wasn't the case with you, then you may be able to request leniency from the creditors. Also, saying "I wouldn't have pleaded guilty if I knew they didn't have proper evidence of me doing that illegal thing" isn't grounds for an appeal. It makes me think you knew they had your number, and cut your losses - but that's besides the point. ill bring that up thanks. That i never recieved the paperwork with oportunity to appeal. Tell them i writing a complaint to the commision. Put your self in my position. I knew the charge. But did not know if I had made a mistake or not. I could not check to find out as police had siezed it. Faced with a 17 year prison sentance i agreed to plead guilty to charges of another offence and take minium sentence and cost. Hopeing it could all be put behind. I had a bloody good defence that would have basicually got me off. Statements evidence witnesses. But not knowing if made a mistake leaving evidence of offence police said i commited. Wasnt willing to chance it. I was brought down by a criminal scum bag that prevoked me and as i said to police i did not feel threatened or intimdated by this violent crimals actions, off criminal damage to vehicle i was in and threating me with baseball bat. I say violant crimal cause he has a wrap sheet as long as his arm. Police i dare say racist sgt took a special disliking to me. The details of the case don't really matter, and you shouldn't give too much information away about yourself online. All that matters now is that you have been convicted so you therefore owe the costs. They will not be written off, unless you can prove hardship. " im happy to pay just need a few months lol even a few days due to health implications. Ive nought to hide dude. Not ashemed justice little angry at whole system. Learning so much. Never dealt with anything like this. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |