FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Sucking lady cock
Sucking lady cock
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I must admit, the thought of passionately fellating a sexy young TS (young as in - younger than me) is one of my current hottest fantasies...any ladies who fit the bill? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"'lady cock'..., I hate that term! Its a COCK FFS, doesn't matter who it is attached too....after all we call ours 'man cocks'  "
Speak for yourself. I love my boyfriend's man cock. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"'lady cock'..., I hate that term! Its a COCK FFS, doesn't matter who it is attached too....after all we call ours 'man cocks' "
Probably because women tend not to have cocks, and guys typically do, hence the addition of 'lady' to help differentiate. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Do people really refer to it as girly cock or lady penis? Genetic females don't have dicks, there's absolutely nothing girly about a penis and I take offence to it. The law in this country is phallo-centric, even in this day of age a female can not be charged with statutory rape because she has nothing to penetrate. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I must admit, the thought of passionately fellating a sexy young TS (young as in - younger than me) is one of my current hottest fantasies...any ladies who fit the bill?"
It's the bits about younger than you, TS and ladycock that cut down your options.
Seems there are 300 TV/TS that fit your age requirements within 100 miles of you. Of course, only a small percentage will be TS; say, 10% =30...then a percentage of those, say 20% are post op.
I reckon you've a choice of about 20 on Fabswingers... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Lady cock??? No such thing unless a lady had a cock surgically added. A TS/TV who was born male will never be a lady. Why are people so thick headed. Just go suck any guys dick and it will be the same for you. A man dressed up as a woman will always be a man. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hortieWoman
over a year ago
Northampton |
Your IQ in my eyes has just dropped about 80% upon reading your OP!!
Lady cock.
Really? LMAO.
But then again, thats just my opinion. If I fuck a TV/TS, I have no interest in their cock - thats a useless piece of equipment to me. I like the slutty kinky male part of the mind in female mode. That I know when they say 'fuck me hard' - I know they fucking mean it.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Lady cock??? No such thing unless a lady had a cock surgically added. A TS/TV who was born male will never be a lady. Why are people so thick headed. Just go suck any guys dick and it will be the same for you. A man dressed up as a woman will always be a man."
You're not in the UK I hope, as your comments are offensive. We also have laws against such talk.
It's my life and I may have faced different issues to you. I'll choose to not offend you and expect to be respected in return. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Lady cock??? No such thing unless a lady had a cock surgically added. A TS/TV who was born male will never be a lady. Why are people so thick headed. Just go suck any guys dick and it will be the same for you. A man dressed up as a woman will always be a man."
....what a man! I just love a real man. So many limp wristed blokes playacting as straight.
I'll make your man cock happy with my lovely pink lips and tight little ladypussy...What about it, Stud? How about mounting a lovely fragrant little philly xxx
mmm....R   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Lady cock??? No such thing unless a lady had a cock surgically added. A TS/TV who was born male will never be a lady. Why are people so thick headed. Just go suck any guys dick and it will be the same for you. A man dressed up as a woman will always be a man.
You're not in the UK I hope, as your comments are offensive. We also have laws against such talk.
It's my life and I may have faced different issues to you. I'll choose to not offend you and expect to be respected in return."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Lady cock??? No such thing unless a lady had a cock surgically added. A TS/TV who was born male will never be a lady. Why are people so thick headed. Just go suck any guys dick and it will be the same for you. A man dressed up as a woman will always be a man.....what a man! I just love a real man. So many limp wristed blokes playacting as straight.
I'll make your man cock happy with my lovely pink lips and tight little ladypussy...What about it, Stud? How about mounting a lovely fragrant little philly xxx
mmm....R "
bet your cock is talking to you now, R |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?"
DeeDee, you can have anything you want, you can say anything you want, wear anything you want and just fuck them all. Life's too short to care what people think...I have a pussy and a clit, one at the back and one at the front. Anyone who has walked through London dressed like I have doesn't give a toss. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?
DeeDee, you can have anything you want, you can say anything you want, wear anything you want and just fuck them all. Life's too short to care what people think...I have a pussy and a clit, one at the back and one at the front. Anyone who has walked through London dressed like I have doesn't give a toss."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?"
Since the OP specifically said TS, I'm not sure how you're connecting that to just dressing as the opposite sex.
I'd go away and do some research into transgender/gender dismorphia, hopefully you'll come back and realise how stupidly bigoted and ridiculous you sound. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Well that thread turned to crap. Imagine my surprise. My local friendly TS has a lovely little cock that i enjoy sucking. And she fucks my ass like a trooper while i suck her perfect boobs! Life's good. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?
Since the OP specifically said TS, I'm not sure how you're connecting that to just dressing as the opposite sex.
I'd go away and do some research into transgender/gender dismorphia, hopefully you'll come back and realise how stupidly bigoted and ridiculous you sound. "
Thankyou DPT
It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?
Since the OP specifically said TS, I'm not sure how you're connecting that to just dressing as the opposite sex.
I'd go away and do some research into transgender/gender dismorphia, hopefully you'll come back and realise how stupidly bigoted and ridiculous you sound.
Thankyou DPT
It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?"
exactly and it just shows the arrogance and ignorance of some people in there forums ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?
Since the OP specifically said TS, I'm not sure how you're connecting that to just dressing as the opposite sex.
I'd go away and do some research into transgender/gender dismorphia, hopefully you'll come back and realise how stupidly bigoted and ridiculous you sound.
Thankyou DPT
It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?"
Lol sexy.
These threads acquire a mind of their own like 'Consequences' you know, where you say something to get the ball rolling and see where it leads. Whilst it's irritating if you have something serious that's ignored it can be quite enlightening or amusing.
For the record, my first post did address the issue. Xxx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?"
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *osieWoman
over a year ago
Wembley |
"Lady cock??? No such thing unless a lady had a cock surgically added. A TS/TV who was born male will never be a lady. Why are people so thick headed. Just go suck any guys dick and it will be the same for you. A man dressed up as a woman will always be a man."
The weather must be improving as the creepy-crawlies are coming out of their caves.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective? "
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Lady cock??? No such thing unless a lady had a cock surgically added. A TS/TV who was born male will never be a lady. Why are people so thick headed. Just go suck any guys dick and it will be the same for you. A man dressed up as a woman will always be a man."
i actually agree with you to a certain extent BUT I just don't think you put it across in the right way hence the responses you have got |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Don't really care about what people are or what they do. Just thought calling a dick a girly/lady cock is stupid. "
i will call mine what the eck i like whether you think stupid or not mrs
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?"
No Sexy.
You original post was fine...except the younger than you bit...you just don't know how good I am xxx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *osieWoman
over a year ago
Wembley |
"Do people really refer to it as girly cock or lady penis? Genetic females don't have dicks, there's absolutely nothing girly about a penis and I take offence to it. The law in this country is phallo-centric, even in this day of age a female can not be charged with statutory rape because she has nothing to penetrate. "
I think the laws on rape changed sometime ago; I could be wrong but I think rape now encompass any object too, therefore a woman can be charged with rape |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?"
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?"
I wouldn't describe it as either new or modified, rather my bisexuality is my real, natural sexual persona - my supposed, but never quite right feelings of heterosexuality were in fact the artificial ones I was creating for myself.
I refer to the debate as daft, given it is ultimately pointless, has no productive conclusion either way (women can't have cocks/women can have cocks_, and ultimately doesn't have anything to do with the threads original purpose of trying to make contact with a TS who fits the bill. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Do people really refer to it as girly cock or lady penis? Genetic females don't have dicks, there's absolutely nothing girly about a penis and I take offence to it. The law in this country is phallo-centric, even in this day of age a female can not be charged with statutory rape because she has nothing to penetrate.
I think the laws on rape changed sometime ago; I could be wrong but I think rape now encompass any object too, therefore a woman can be charged with rape"
Hi Josie,
actually the law still says penetration with a penis but, I understand, a woman can be found guilty of rape if she participates in the crime, for example holds the victim down. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?"
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Damn you, XHamster - for creating these unobtainable fantasies! 
I think a lot of threads here are due to porn to be fair lol. "
Far from un obtainable in my experience... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ty31Man
over a year ago
NW London |
"Do people really refer to it as girly cock or lady penis? Genetic females don't have dicks, there's absolutely nothing girly about a penis and I take offence to it. The law in this country is phallo-centric, even in this day of age a female can not be charged with statutory rape because she has nothing to penetrate.
I think the laws on rape changed sometime ago; I could be wrong but I think rape now encompass any object too, therefore a woman can be charged with rape
Hi Josie,
actually the law still says penetration with a penis but, I understand, a woman can be found guilty of rape if she participates in the crime, for example holds the victim down."
Yes as an accessory via aiding, abetting, councilling or procuring. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
i really dont understand the thread myself cos if i wanted something so bad ide quietly go about getting it rather than placing my thoughts on here lol maybe it cud be one of those suck it and see kinda threads ??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!"
belligerent? how?
I've just asked why the OP labelled a wider range of discussion as being daft.
To which he replied that it was abusive.
And now I'm being belligerent?
I understand that you may feel defensive, but a strategy of criticism and accusation on a fairly light topic isn't going to help.
So, why is it daft to discuss the above stuff? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!"
I agree with this sentiment, think the op has been given a little unnecessary stick. Granted using the term lady cock deserved a giggle but no venom ?
I have my opinions on the term man cunt. IF there was a thread discussing how if why or should a TV use such a term then comment would be justified
If a chap just declares he wants to be balls deep in man cunt then it's his fantasy his euphemism xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!
belligerent? how?
I've just asked why the OP labelled a wider range of discussion as being daft.
To which he replied that it was abusive.
And now I'm being belligerent?
I understand that you may feel defensive, but a strategy of criticism and accusation on a fairly light topic isn't going to help.
So, why is it daft to discuss the above stuff? "
My mistake. The word introduced when I asked about "daft" was "hostile" not "abuse". |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!
I agree with this sentiment, think the op has been given a little unnecessary stick. Granted using the term lady cock deserved a giggle but no venom ?
I have my opinions on the term man cunt. IF there was a thread discussing how if why or should a TV use such a term then comment would be justified
If a chap just declares he wants to be balls deep in man cunt then it's his fantasy his euphemism xx"
i dont believe most tvs wud use the term man cunt i certainly dont and if a guy used the term to me personally i wud feel a little offended |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!
I agree with this sentiment, think the op has been given a little unnecessary stick. Granted using the term lady cock deserved a giggle but no venom ?
I have my opinions on the term man cunt. IF there was a thread discussing how if why or should a TV use such a term then comment would be justified
If a chap just declares he wants to be balls deep in man cunt then it's his fantasy his euphemism xxi dont believe most tvs wud use the term man cunt i certainly dont and if a guy used the term to me personally i wud feel a little offended "
Lots of men message me wanting me to use their man cunt
I understand their reasoning and it bothers me not
I do reply that I like cunt and not ass, and that lady cunt has certain tastes ,smells textures and attributes a man cunt does not but I seriously don't see why adults would be too concerned about someone trying to navigate their way through the minefield of preferred sexual terms that some love and some hate usually for arbitrary reasoning
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!
I agree with this sentiment, think the op has been given a little unnecessary stick. Granted using the term lady cock deserved a giggle but no venom ?
I have my opinions on the term man cunt. IF there was a thread discussing how if why or should a TV use such a term then comment would be justified
If a chap just declares he wants to be balls deep in man cunt then it's his fantasy his euphemism xxi dont believe most tvs wud use the term man cunt i certainly dont and if a guy used the term to me personally i wud feel a little offended "
I like to use it when i dress up! Mmmm slide your Dick inside my mancunt..... Delicious... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do people really refer to it as girly cock or lady penis? Genetic females don't have dicks, there's absolutely nothing girly about a penis and I take offence to it. The law in this country is phallo-centric, even in this day of age a female can not be charged with statutory rape because she has nothing to penetrate.
I think the laws on rape changed sometime ago; I could be wrong but I think rape now encompass any object too, therefore a woman can be charged with rape"
Even if a woman fucked someone with a strap on without consent it would be classed as sexual assault not rape. A woman would only be charged with rape if she aided a man with raping someone.
Anyway, girly cock. I don't like it, I'm a girl or woman, I don't like being associated with a penis. It's a cock a veiny gristle gut stick, nothing girly about it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Anyway, girly cock. I don't like it, I'm a girl or woman, I don't like being associated with a penis. It's a cock a veiny gristle gut stick, nothing girly about it. "
Or VGS as Graham Norton told me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective? "
It's beyond me how my relatively straightforward question got turned around into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a person to ask a simple question without it being labelled hostile, belligerent or ridiculous? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"what is cat like about a pussy ?? which is a widely used and seemingly accepted term is it not ?"
What are Richards like about dicks, what are trees like about wood? I'm sure if cats could talk they wouldn't like being associated with a fanny. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Okay, SB, to answer your question:
1, you asked this in the lounge.
2, not every disagreement is a personal attack.
3, expect unconventional terminology and topics to be commented upon. This is a public forum. And specifically, this is the Lounge and you know very well the people here.
4, nobody owns a thread or the direction that will take.
5. Something which isn't in agreement with you isn't automatically rendered false, unworthy of opinion or daft. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"what is cat like about a pussy ?? which is a widely used and seemingly accepted term is it not ?
What are Richards like about dicks, what are trees like about wood? I'm sure if cats could talk they wouldn't like being associated with a fanny. "
and one wonders why the name (whether a shortening of a name) fanny is no longer popular ha x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?
DeeDee, you can have anything you want, you can say anything you want, wear anything you want and just fuck them all. Life's too short to care what people think...I have a pussy and a clit, one at the back and one at the front. Anyone who has walked through London dressed like I have doesn't give a toss."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!
I agree with this sentiment, think the op has been given a little unnecessary stick. Granted using the term lady cock deserved a giggle but no venom ?
I have my opinions on the term man cunt. IF there was a thread discussing how if why or should a TV use such a term then comment would be justified
If a chap just declares he wants to be balls deep in man cunt then it's his fantasy his euphemism xxi dont believe most tvs wud use the term man cunt i certainly dont and if a guy used the term to me personally i wud feel a little offended "
lol...Leah, I think they'd be out the door. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *osieWoman
over a year ago
Wembley |
"Do people really refer to it as girly cock or lady penis? Genetic females don't have dicks, there's absolutely nothing girly about a penis and I take offence to it. The law in this country is phallo-centric, even in this day of age a female can not be charged with statutory rape because she has nothing to penetrate.
I think the laws on rape changed sometime ago; I could be wrong but I think rape now encompass any object too, therefore a woman can be charged with rape
Even if a woman fucked someone with a strap on without consent it would be classed as sexual assault not rape. A woman would only be charged with rape if she aided a man with raping someone.
Anyway, girly cock. I don't like it, I'm a girl or woman, I don't like being associated with a penis. It's a cock a veiny gristle gut stick, nothing girly about it. "
You are correct; I thought it had been changed. Silly for it not to be as it is the act itself and not what is used which causes the harm
I demand equality |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do people really refer to it as girly cock or lady penis? Genetic females don't have dicks, there's absolutely nothing girly about a penis and I take offence to it. The law in this country is phallo-centric, even in this day of age a female can not be charged with statutory rape because she has nothing to penetrate.
I think the laws on rape changed sometime ago; I could be wrong but I think rape now encompass any object too, therefore a woman can be charged with rape"
Nah its still a penis,women get "sexual assault "
But a woman did get convicted of rape bevause she lured another woman into a gang rape and held her down during the attack. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?
Is it a daft debate because it now doesn't fit with your recently modified personal perspective?
Two things:
1. I don't recall in recent memory ever showing hostility toward any TS's on here, I've mostly kept quiet in the past.
2. Recently modified, or simply revealed?
1. I referred to you calling a technical/generic/philosophical discussion "daft". I never mentioned hostility.
2. You have previously mentioned that you never knew about or wouldn't admit to yourself your gay/bi side. As such I would class your personal discovery as new/modified.
So, why is the discussion around this so "daft" when maybe you yourself a few months ago wouldn't have openly agreed with your current comments?
Why are you being so beligerant at what was a pretty harmless OP. There is no philosophical discussion to be had over Sexy's sexuality...maybe he has change maybe he hasnt maybe he hid his sexuality before, who gives a toss.
To have a debate about ladycock (lets remind ourselves that is what this is about) is ridiculous...if a woman calls her muff "pussy" or a man refers to his wife's "pussy"...is that an insult to cats...phew...mods close this thread pleeeeeze!
I agree with this sentiment, think the op has been given a little unnecessary stick. Granted using the term lady cock deserved a giggle but no venom ?
I have my opinions on the term man cunt. IF there was a thread discussing how if why or should a TV use such a term then comment would be justified
If a chap just declares he wants to be balls deep in man cunt then it's his fantasy his euphemism xxi dont believe most tvs wud use the term man cunt i certainly dont and if a guy used the term to me personally i wud feel a little offended
lol...Leah, I think they'd be out the door. "
too right rachel ! lol xxx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So if i dressed as a male have a 'male fanny'?
Since the OP specifically said TS, I'm not sure how you're connecting that to just dressing as the opposite sex.
I'd go away and do some research into transgender/gender dismorphia, hopefully you'll come back and realise how stupidly bigoted and ridiculous you sound.
Thankyou DPT
It's beyond me how my thread on a relatively straightforward sexual request got turned into another daft debate on whether or not it's technically/generically/philosophically possible for a woman to have a penis?"
Come on, it's fabland - such stuff is normal here. We're in our own time/space continuum and it buggers many things up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
