FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Erase from history
Erase from history
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago
Titz Towers, North Notts |
No one - it's too early to tell what benefits a distant descendent of theirs may bring, or the same of anyone affected by their actions. Going back and hitting them with a wet fish is probably ok, though.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If you could erase someone, anyone, from ever existing, who would you choose?
ISIS !!!
ISIS isn't a person "
I think his name was Abu something, can't remember |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm not sure I would. Butterfly effect and all that. "
This. I don't see people like Hitler as unique. Just the person that happened to fill a void. If they didn't do it, someone else would have. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd eradicate Mosquitoes and Midges ..... pesky little fookers......
But what about all those people on Bank Holidays who like watching 633 Squadron?   "
Dam-Big-Busters..... you've got me....  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs."
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There are so many worthy contenders, but as Jennij said we need to consider the 'butterfly effect' - but I do like the idea of slapping them in the face with a wet, smelly fish X "
Honestly don't think if you did name someone it would happen! Not unless some genius time travel inventer is a swinger and would do them in for a meet 
P's I'd say that fish.. just in case your thinkingof whacking me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There are so many worthy contenders, but as Jennij said we need to consider the 'butterfly effect' - but I do like the idea of slapping them in the face with a wet, smelly fish X
Honestly don't think if you did name someone it would happen! Not unless some genius time travel inventer is a swinger and would do them in for a meet
P's I'd say that fish.. just in case your thinkingof whacking me "
Why on earth would I want Tobit you with a wet fish? Just checked your profile and wouldn't mind hitting you with something else lol xxx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon"
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it."
I don't contest that modern weapons are more efficient at killing. But weapons exist because humans want to kill. Killing doesn't just happen because weapons happen to exist. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it.
I don't contest that modern weapons are more efficient at killing. But weapons exist because humans want to kill. Killing doesn't just happen because weapons happen to exist. "
Reminds me of that Larson cartoon with a flying saucer sporting the bumper sticker:
Ray guns don't kill Zorbonians, Zorbonians kill Zorbonians |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it.
I don't contest that modern weapons are more efficient at killing. But weapons exist because humans want to kill. Killing doesn't just happen because weapons happen to exist. "
Correct me if I'm wrong but most of Pol Pot's victims weren't shot but had their heads caved in with lengths of rusty axle rod..when you go back to Year Zero you use primitive but effective methods.....nasty bastard |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *LCCCouple
over a year ago
Cambridge |
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs."
Because no one was ever killed before guns and bombs?
There are a few of my old bosses that I would love to erase. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it.
I don't contest that modern weapons are more efficient at killing. But weapons exist because humans want to kill. Killing doesn't just happen because weapons happen to exist. "
True, but there would less killings, possibly less terrorists as well. For a start suicide bombers wouldn't be here, nor would planes be blown up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it.
I don't contest that modern weapons are more efficient at killing. But weapons exist because humans want to kill. Killing doesn't just happen because weapons happen to exist.
True, but there would less killings, possibly less terrorists as well. For a start suicide bombers wouldn't be here, nor would planes be blown up."
Yes I suppose if we could "de-invent" gunpowder we could go back to beheadings, crucifixions and stonings.
Oops, we already have. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it.
I don't contest that modern weapons are more efficient at killing. But weapons exist because humans want to kill. Killing doesn't just happen because weapons happen to exist.
True, but there would less killings, possibly less terrorists as well. For a start suicide bombers wouldn't be here, nor would planes be blown up."
Weapons are also a deterrent so not having guns and bombs would mean the rich countries like England for example would be under a lot more threat from around the world. The world would be on more of a level playing field as weapons are expensive.
If People didn't use guns to fight they would use swords instead.
The weapons you all hate so much are what gives you the protection and freedom you have in this country.
People have been killing people since the beginning of time, guns or no guns.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The person that invented gun powder, as so many people might still be around today that have been needlessly taken due to guns and bombs.
Cavemen made spears for the same job, if they weren't killed with guns and bombs then it would have been another weapon
Spears only kill 1 at a time, plus you have to up close and personal with it.
I don't contest that modern weapons are more efficient at killing. But weapons exist because humans want to kill. Killing doesn't just happen because weapons happen to exist.
True, but there would less killings, possibly less terrorists as well. For a start suicide bombers wouldn't be here, nor would planes be blown up.
Weapons are also a deterrent so not having guns and bombs would mean the rich countries like England for example would be under a lot more threat from around the world. The world would be on more of a level playing field as weapons are expensive.
If People didn't use guns to fight they would use swords instead.
The weapons you all hate so much are what gives you the protection and freedom you have in this country.
People have been killing people since the beginning of time, guns or no guns.
"
The Nazi's found guns inefficient for murdering Jews so developed gas chambers instead. I don't think that's a good thing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
