FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Rejecting photos
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Your second one I had to look closer at. Probably too much filtering" I doubt it was anything to do with the filtering. I used the minimum touch with no contrasts at all. It's just someone playing some stupid game coz the reason is the stupidest reason of all | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Chill out, its only Fab!" I'm chilled. It really looks like someone is pranking me or something. I just cant believe someone can miss a black guy with an asian lady on top of white sheets in a monochrome picture. Telling me I'm not in the picture. Specsavers anyone lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Try again, if they get rejected report the image stating why it shouldn't have been rejected. " Tried 3 times then used the email and now just contacted owners directly to explain. Thanks though | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Although OP, the few photos you have are very good although may I ask - for the last photo - do you have a removable head? " Monochrome shots are quite often very classy. Not sure I like these - too grainy/in distinct for my liking. And, yes, the lack of head (no pun intended) just looks strange. Maybe a loser crop would have been better. As for the non-approved photo(s) - were there any distinguishing marks left in the photo? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I'm glad someone is doing there it properly for a change instead of accepting silly Facebook pictures and quotes " *sigh* I might change my haribos one to my usual. Anyone agree? (Not a thread hijack - it's photo related) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Your second one I had to look closer at. Probably too much filtering I doubt it was anything to do with the filtering. I used the minimum touch with no contrasts at all. It's just someone playing some stupid game coz the reason is the stupidest reason of all" If you say so.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I'm glad someone is doing there it properly for a change instead of accepting silly Facebook pictures and quotes *sigh* I might change my haribos one to my usual. Anyone agree? (Not a thread hijack - it's photo related) " Change it to a packet of tangfastics instead | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I'm glad someone is doing there it properly for a change instead of accepting silly Facebook pictures and quotes *sigh* I might change my haribos one to my usual. Anyone agree? (Not a thread hijack - it's photo related) Change it to a packet of tangfastics instead " Pink n white marshmallows | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I'm glad someone is doing there it properly for a change instead of accepting silly Facebook pictures and quotes *sigh* I might change my haribos one to my usual. Anyone agree? (Not a thread hijack - it's photo related) " be careful, they will be coming after your haribos soon. lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I'm glad someone is doing there it properly for a change instead of accepting silly Facebook pictures and quotes " since when do facebook show naked people in the 69 position and a man eating a woman's pussy? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I'm glad someone is doing there it properly for a change instead of accepting silly Facebook pictures and quotes *sigh* I might change my haribos one to my usual. Anyone agree? (Not a thread hijack - it's photo related) Change it to a packet of tangfastics instead Pink n white marshmallows " Ooh I like that idea | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I do have some sympathy for you. I've had had some pics rejected because they showed others (allegedly). It leaves me scratching my head when pics by men showing the woman they're with get approved. And I don't mean that it shows the ladies leg - her face clearly on show (and clearly not a man!) I'm not cross about it per se - just bemused. Unless I'm missing something (perhaps they had a note from their mum ), it all seems...well, random" I think they appoint fabbers to the positions. So it could be just a fabber with some ill feelings towards me. I've made a series of complaints about it. Seems extraordinarily ridiculous. And if you become content with it, they'll just carry on. So need to resolve this one by all means | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The mods are volunteers, it's a thankless task, if you think it's been rejected unjustly report, Everyone makes mistakes. To err is human to forgive divine. " Not an error when its rejected 4 times. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The mods are volunteers, it's a thankless task, if you think it's been rejected unjustly report, Everyone makes mistakes. To err is human to forgive divine. Not an error when its rejected 4 times. " That one on show? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The mods are volunteers, it's a thankless task, if you think it's been rejected unjustly report, Everyone makes mistakes. To err is human to forgive divine. Not an error when its rejected 4 times. " Then either the same person has made the same mistake ...or...different folk are interpreting the rules in a consistent way... Might not be your interpretation but it's consistent. They're volunteers doing a thank less task. Remember Without them no pictures.... if you'd like to volunteer I'm sure the site owners will consider your application. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Mostly when people have complained their photos have been rejected they resubmit them and they get accepted. Just like yours " Finally after 4 attempts lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Mostly when people have complained their photos have been rejected they resubmit them and they get accepted. Just like yours Finally after 4 attempts lol " Whoo-hoo! And the 69 one | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Mostly when people have complained their photos have been rejected they resubmit them and they get accepted. Just like yours Finally after 4 attempts lol ..thank you mods." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The mods are volunteers " Ahhh - I didn't know that. (tbh, never even thought about it!). Then, yes, we ought to give some more leeway to them. Mind you...some days I seem to end up so much time perving the pics that I feel I'm vetting them too | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |