 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
well i took our notice off. am hoping u doris's will download my pics and they will keep ya in ya place when your doing your ironing....get ya all hot and bothered |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"well i took our notice off. am hoping u doris's will download my pics and they will keep ya in ya place when your doing your ironing....get ya all hot and bothered"
I dont have a warning on mine...except about animals, but the heading works well as a warning lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's total load of cock. Entirely meaningless.
If you don't want anyone nicking your stuff, the answer is easy - don't post it on the internet ..
See FAQ's page third from the bottom
http://www.fabswingers.com/articles/FAQ
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Clerk of the Court:
Please state your name.
Defendant:
Wishy
Clerk of the Court:
Mr. Wishy, you are charged with using explicit photos of Miss Sexonlegs without her permission on a swinging website. How do you plead?
Defendant:
Prove it was me.
Clerk of the Court:
You ARE Mr. Wishy, aren't you?
Defendant:
I might be.
Clerk of the Court:
But you just confirmed it to the court!
Defendant:
It's just a word, I don't use that word at the pub nor in my tax returns.
Clerk of the Court:
So you are NOT Mr. Wishy then?
Defendant:
I don't know anymore, I have so many nicknames.
Clerk of the Court:
Do you know Miss Sexonlegs?
Defendant:
I'm not sure. I think so but she may have been using another name.
Clerk of the Court:
Can you tell us what that name is?
Defendant:
Sure. .... Brian.
Clerk of the Court:
M'lud, clearly this is a case of mistaken identity, or, more to the point, multiple identity, and the court cannot be sure who is who and who stole what.
Judge:
I know Miss Sexonlegs, I shafted her in Chams the other night. She's not the girl in these photos. Case dismissed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Clerk of the Court:
Please state your name.
Defendant:
Wishy
Clerk of the Court:
Mr. Wishy, you are charged with using explicit photos of Miss Sexonlegs without her permission on a swinging website. How do you plead?
Defendant:
Prove it was me.
Clerk of the Court:
You ARE Mr. Wishy, aren't you?
Defendant:
I might be.
Clerk of the Court:
But you just confirmed it to the court!
Defendant:
It's just a word, I don't use that word at the pub nor in my tax returns.
Clerk of the Court:
So you are NOT Mr. Wishy then?
Defendant:
I don't know anymore, I have so many nicknames.
Clerk of the Court:
Do you know Miss Sexonlegs?
Defendant:
I'm not sure. I think so but she may have been using another name.
Clerk of the Court:
Can you tell us what that name is?
Defendant:
Sure. .... Brian.
Clerk of the Court:
M'lud, clearly this is a case of mistaken identity, or, more to the point, multiple identity, and the court cannot be sure who is who and who stole what.
Judge:
I know Miss Sexonlegs, I shafted her in Chams the other night. She's not the girl in these photos. Case dismissed."
pmsl  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I have just had an issue with our pictures being used on another site by an American couple.. Mailed there admin.. showed we owned the pictures and the couple had there profile pictures removed and a notice put over there profile explaining why!!
The cheeky sods then tried to tell me they were in fact there own.. After explaining the fact it was my wife in my house with my fookin fireplace and I watermarked the images so they come back if used he shut the fluck up lol... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"...and I watermarked the images so they come back if used ..."
What do you mean by that? Did they just steal mrs notts or pics of you as well?
Does make you worry a bit. I don't really use any other sites so would have no way of knowing if someone had stolen them... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I have just had an issue with our pictures being used on another site by an American couple.. Mailed there admin.. showed we owned the pictures and the couple had there profile pictures removed and a notice put over there profile explaining why!!
The cheeky sods then tried to tell me they were in fact there own.. After explaining the fact it was my wife in my house with my fookin fireplace and I watermarked the images so they come back if used he shut the fluck up lol..."
thats because Mrs Notts is a honey, but cheeky cheeky cheeky buggers eh. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You use a watermarking and reporting system... Adobe Photoshop can add the watermark.. then you can subscribe to many tracking systems..."
So you get notification if someone uses them? sounds like a good idea.
Reason I asked if it was just mrs notts is I was wondering if I was being over paranoid in thinking someone would steal pics of a guy, lol
Did they use ones of you as well? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Anyone can do it... try digimark... I use it as part of work.. So easy lol.
Tells me who, where and when downloaded lol."
ahem...they were for research purposes...honest!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
now my tits have their very own bar code. soooo if i do what you say over the pictures and watermark and scan. Will this then show who has got them
ie a load of doris's standing in their pink fluffy slippers drooling over their ironing boards |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"now my tits have their very own bar code. soooo if i do what you say over the pictures and watermark and scan. Will this then show who has got them
ie a load of doris's standing in their pink fluffy slippers drooling over their ironing boards "
you have a warning stamped on your head but i like danger  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"now my tits have their very own bar code. soooo if i do what you say over the pictures and watermark and scan. Will this then show who has got them
ie a load of doris's standing in their pink fluffy slippers drooling over their ironing boards you have a warning stamped on your head but i like danger "
its the warning on my pussy that you have to worry about......
slippery surface
hazzard
tunnel approaching
enter at your own risk
and of course
made in japan |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *umourCouple
over a year ago
Rushden |
And I can just see someone taking out litigation!!! So much for discretion! Have to admit you had a profile on a swingers site and how many are going to do that?
Just a waste of space, time and server space! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
WARNING: Anyone reading this message and do not wish to engage in dialogue as to the suitability of us meet, will be considered a serious violation of my privacy and will be subject to legal ramifications.
You have been warned... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"WARNING: Anyone reading this message and do not wish to engage in dialogue as to the suitability of us meet, will be considered a serious violation of my privacy and will be subject to legal ramifications.
You have been warned..."
sexual ramifications....does that mean u do it hard??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
When somebody starts a new site, the first thing they have to do is populate it with new profiles - otherwise, who would join an empty site ? There is a market in profiles, you can buy and sell them. So, if anybody is concerned about their profiles being used in this way, try putting a few unique words together in the profile (if you haven't already) and then use Google to see where else they turn up. Many search engine spiders can now follow profile pages built from a database, so this is one way to find out what other sites you are on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"lmao...if anyone steals mine they are really warped.
Besides I change mine 2 or 3 times a week.
Now I know your profile is full of 'statistics'!
lmao.x
;)
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *edhot4blkCouple
over a year ago
York/London/Crantock |
Actually it does work and works well, ok we all know it goes on u having ur pics stolen and placed on other sites etc etc etc but in having the legal warning placed on ones profile means if u do catch the person who has done it and ur willing to go to court to prove it(99.9% wont for good reason)it means a third member has indeed gone against ur personal wishes as per copy right..as i did state not many would take it to cought but i can reveal smith v henderson 5yrs ago this did happen and the person who did infact remove someones pics and place them on a cam site was fined a total of $22,000 with costs of $5,000 plus compensation of $100,000... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
fook me.......ive just googled and im 9 different sites!
some of the profiles are cracking....wish id written them and at least they stole a decent picture.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
smith v henderson - can you give a source please ? Only case I can find with those names is an employment case.
As for copyright violation, courts only tend to award market value of the images - photo agencies in court get as compensation the fee they would have received had the violator purchased them properly. So is smith v henderson a copyright case, or a privacy case ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"fook me.......ive just googled and im 9 different sites!
some of the profiles are cracking....wish id written them and at least they stole a decent picture. "
Your google must be better than mine, or did you spell it different? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"smith v henderson - can you give a source please ? Only case I can find with those names is an employment case.
As for copyright violation, courts only tend to award market value of the images - photo agencies in court get as compensation the fee they would have received had the violator purchased them properly. So is smith v henderson a copyright case, or a privacy case ?"
Yes, however, you noticed it was a US thing. There must be more that just using a pic, maybe they were in a relationship and it ended and the photos were used malicously. Be nice if the actual court details were sourced. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Indeed, that's what I am saying. In the US, and here, the only thing you will get as a result of winning a copyright case is the amount you should have received had the images been properly licensed, which could be anything from 30 quid to a few hundred. These matters are best dealt with via a take-down notice to the ISP, not to the site admin. I know, I run a photo agency, I do it every day. So if there was a case where thousands of dollars were involved, I can't see how it is a copyright case, it's got to be different infringements, and the compensation amount would reflect real damage done - eg, loss of employment because the employer saw the profile, etc.
Nor can putting a legal warning on the end of a profile make a difference - you have copyright in your images and text whatever notice you put, and whether you like it or not ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
