FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Conspiracy theorists
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? " Why are you trying to find out? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? Why are you trying to find out? " Oi Steve! I thought you were bowing out or was that a conspiracy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? Why are you trying to find out? Oi Steve! I thought you were bowing out or was that a conspiracy?" I'm trying to be on here less but am on a coffee break. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? " . What you mean like Hillsborough! Or like mk ultra The American government poisoning alcohol during prohibition to put the fear into folk! Operation north woods, where they planned to fly planes into buildings and blame it on Cubans! Deliberately Giving syphilus to black men for 30 years so they could see the results Trading cocaine for weapons so they could back guerrilla warfare! Oh wait you just mean the tin foil hat ones!... Like 911 and aliens | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? " Definitely..got loads of my own too!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A guy at my work place believes the earth is FLAT?? he is dead serious lol. Apparently there are loads of videos on YouTube which support his views. " Ah! YouTube! This is where many people gather their evidence and as we know the internet never lies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A guy at my work place believes the earth is FLAT?? he is dead serious lol. Apparently there are loads of videos on YouTube which support his views. Ah! YouTube! This is where many people gather their evidence and as we know the internet never lies." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A guy at my work place believes the earth is FLAT?? he is dead serious lol. Apparently there are loads of videos on YouTube which support his views. " . Does he understand the concept of why you can see further when your up a hill | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For most conspiracy theories it's the sheer number of random people who would have to be in on it and the implausible nature of the theory itself that surprises me every time. I know a hugely intelligent man who gets taken in by all sorts." Is he called Bertie? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A guy at my work place believes the earth is FLAT?? he is dead serious lol. Apparently there are loads of videos on YouTube which support his views. . Does he understand the concept of why you can see further when your up a hill " Don't know and don't care to be honest. I'm not gonna ask because he just don't shut up once he gets started lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For most conspiracy theories it's the sheer number of random people who would have to be in on it and the implausible nature of the theory itself that surprises me every time. I know a hugely intelligent man who gets taken in by all sorts. Is he called Bertie?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 was a terrorist act I really feel sorry for the families of those who died that have to listen to the tripe that people come out with..." Me too, it must rub a bit more salt in the wound every time some tool starts up about it again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 was a terrorist act I really feel sorry for the families of those who died that have to listen to the tripe that people come out with..." Luckily nobody pays them much attention. Saw someone in court for denying that Lee Rigby existed much less that he was killed in the street. Some Weebo's about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 was a terrorist act I really feel sorry for the families of those who died that have to listen to the tripe that people come out with... Luckily nobody pays them much attention. Saw someone in court for denying that Lee Rigby existed much less that he was killed in the street. Some Weebo's about. " That's just sick | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One thing getting old teachers you is.... If you'd actually wrote an article 15 years ago declaring that banks are run by megalomaniacs with a penchant for drugs and rent boys, that there actively conspiring to rig international markets, hide illegal trade with drug barons, terrorist organisations, billionaires. That there selling wholesale products that are unfit for purpose, wrapping up debt to hide its true origin and actively bribing politicans worldwide.... Well if you had you'd have been laughed out of the room, by people saying.... Oh there a little crazy But who's laughing now " My favourite conspiracy theory is that many conspiracy theories are created by major organisations / governments deliberately, some to hide other truths. e.g. the US Government created and encouraged the UFO theories in order to cover up test flights of experimental military aircraft. Others just to ensure that people view all conspiracy as a joke. Remember just because you are paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reaserch any "conspiracy" u shall seek the TRUTH example A. The twin towers.... " So what is the theory? did the twin towers not exist in the first place? was it all CGI? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 was a terrorist act I really feel sorry for the families of those who died that have to listen to the tripe that people come out with..." Then how do you explain the collapse of the third tower? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 was a terrorist act I really feel sorry for the families of those who died that have to listen to the tripe that people come out with... Then how do you explain the collapse of the third tower?" Oh behave you... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? " You are aware that we are ALL watching you, aren't you? And you really should put some clothes on, the curtains are open! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"terrorists Buish knew, he stonewalled any investigation for two years. Aug 6th memo Bin Laden to steal planes and run them into WTC, they ignored it they wanted it to happen to eradicate DEBT. Don't start on building 7 saying it's collapsed all the while it was STILL STANDING. iT FELL HALF AN HOUR LATER..... " Ok calm down. Its going to be alright. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? Why are you trying to find out? Oi Steve! I thought you were bowing out or was that a conspiracy?" Did you not know that Steve is actually not a person but an entire department of MI18 who are there to make sure we are all looking at FAB rather than investigating what department MI17 is up to | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? Why are you trying to find out? Oi Steve! I thought you were bowing out or was that a conspiracy? Did you not know that Steve is actually not a person but an entire department of MI18 who are there to make sure we are all looking at FAB rather than investigating what department MI17 is up to " Damn! Is he? I must have been sitting next to a front man at the Sussex social | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"terrorists Buish knew, he stonewalled any investigation for two years. Aug 6th memo Bin Laden to steal planes and run them into WTC, they ignored it they wanted it to happen to eradicate DEBT. Don't start on building 7 saying it's collapsed all the while it was STILL STANDING. iT FELL HALF AN HOUR LATER..... Ok calm down. Its going to be alright. " Haven't you heard? They're all out to get him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this" Please don't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? Why are you trying to find out? Oi Steve! I thought you were bowing out or was that a conspiracy? Did you not know that Steve is actually not a person but an entire department of MI18 who are there to make sure we are all looking at FAB rather than investigating what department MI17 is up to Damn! Is he? I must have been sitting next to a front man at the Sussex social " Did you not think it suspicious that only a few hours before you sat next to one of the Steve clones that Steve posted on here! how could he be in two places almost at once if he was not an entire department | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this Please don't." Can't deny the truth unfortunately | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this Please don't. Can't deny the truth unfortunately" Happy to continue to deny your version of the truth, thanks. I trust my own brain more than yours. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this Please don't. Can't deny the truth unfortunately Happy to continue to deny your version of the truth, thanks. I trust my own brain more than yours." Then I really worry for you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It seems often peace of mind is sought through the official story and a refusal to accept the counter information I respect that, but until it can be proven how a plane can crash land and leave No debris, twice! (to name one item) Then I wish the truth and the peace seeker could be viewed equally and not one belittled to aid the other" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this Please don't. Can't deny the truth unfortunately Happy to continue to deny your version of the truth, thanks. I trust my own brain more than yours. Then I really worry for you " Again...please don't. I'm a happy and contented person and no one is out to get me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reaserch any "conspiracy" u shall seek the TRUTH example A. The twin towers.... So what is the theory? did the twin towers not exist in the first place? was it all CGI? " I'll tell my cousin who was in one of the Towers at the time he's CGI. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Me i find most conspiracy theorists smoke too much " So you beleive the plane left no debris then, how? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reaserch any "conspiracy" u shall seek the TRUTH example A. The twin towers.... So what is the theory? did the twin towers not exist in the first place? was it all CGI? I'll tell my cousin who was in one of the Towers at the time he's CGI. " Your cousin never exsisted according to some | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Me i find most conspiracy theorists smoke too much So you beleive the plane left no debris then, how?" I believe they did find debis from the plane...and its on show in the 9/11 museum in New York | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know the one plane ended up in the pentagon and there is only 1/2 a second of film of the plane ??? This is one of the most heavily guarded places in the world ! So you has McDonald's got more video and camera than the pentagon. I know just the tin hat is starting to hurt now take cover-_-_-_-_ " All the CCTV was switched off at the pentagon on 911... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Me i find most conspiracy theorists smoke too much So you beleive the plane left no debris then, how? I believe they did find debis from the plane...and its on show in the 9/11 museum in New York " "You are free to do as we tell you" Bill Hicks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The truth will set you free...but first it will seriously piss you off..." Sad how true that is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You know the one plane ended up in the pentagon and there is only 1/2 a second of film of the plane ??? This is one of the most heavily guarded places in the world ! So you has McDonald's got more video and camera than the pentagon. I know just the tin hat is starting to hurt now take cover-_-_-_-_ " There's no evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon, no wreckage nothing on cctv except a small hole in one of the walls - a missile in my opinion. Makes me laugh how so many people go along with what they are told by the mainstream media but when presented by real documented factual evidence proving the official version of such events is a lie and completely wrong they deny the truth but yet cannot debunk any of the evidence presented to them. Let them carry on in their happy make believe world. No this doesn't make me a tin foil hatted crank it means I'm clever enough to look at the actual facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then " That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reaserch any "conspiracy" u shall seek the TRUTH example A. The twin towers.... So what is the theory? did the twin towers not exist in the first place? was it all CGI? I'll tell my cousin who was in one of the Towers at the time he's CGI. Your cousin never exsisted according to some " The two at ground level don't either. I appreciate people examining the facts but my reality is that people were affected and I'm more interested in helping them in the here and now than spending the same amount of time debunking theories. There are conspiracies big and small (LIBOR, covering up paedophilia, a surprise birthday party for someone's husband) and the people who want to ferret around in that have a hobby they enjoy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So if 911 is real then, aviation fuel can burn through steel girders but terrorists passports survive???" Not only that but the firefighters testimony states they heard explosions inside the WTC'S and molten metal was smouldering for weeks after the event. Aviation fuel does not cause this - that's a proven scientific fact, I'm not quite sure how people can argue against evidence like that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. " It's called compartmentalisation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reaserch any "conspiracy" u shall seek the TRUTH example A. The twin towers.... So what is the theory? did the twin towers not exist in the first place? was it all CGI? I'll tell my cousin who was in one of the Towers at the time he's CGI. Your cousin never exsisted according to some The two at ground level don't either. I appreciate people examining the facts but my reality is that people were affected and I'm more interested in helping them in the here and now than spending the same amount of time debunking theories. There are conspiracies big and small (LIBOR, covering up paedophilia, a surprise birthday party for someone's husband) and the people who want to ferret around in that have a hobby they enjoy. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So if 911 is real then, aviation fuel can burn through steel girders but terrorists passports survive??? Not only that but the firefighters testimony states they heard explosions inside the WTC'S and molten metal was smouldering for weeks after the event. Aviation fuel does not cause this - that's a proven scientific fact, I'm not quite sure how people can argue against evidence like that" So what your basically saying is aviation fuel on an airplane cant explode | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. It's called compartmentalisation " I think you spelt "bollocks" wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. It's called compartmentalisation " Must be a big compartment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. It's called compartmentalisation I think you spelt "bollocks" wrong. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. " But that doesn't disprove the physical impossibilities that occurred that day, it's an unanswered question deriving from it Agree a lot of people would have to be involved, how, why are they silent, Not something I have or any theory I'am aware off can answer But planes still leave debris, two jet engines hit a wall they tend to break a brick ot two, the towers where designed to withstand plane impact, then is loads of unanswered questions that mean We must question the official story until these are confirmed Until a theory is proven it's unproven, in both cases for and against the official story there are unanswered questions which mean it cannot he accepted until these are resolved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. " Now that I'm following this thread I will set out how I think it IS possible for hundreds of people to be involved. It's very simple, you just change the instructions for people doing their job incrementally. You make small changes that mean not a lot in themselves, maybe efficiency savings or testing a new bit of kit. Everyone does their own bit as instructed. Only a few people know the big picture and how slotting the bits into the jigsaw will make the picture. You do need a few die hard kamikaze types, hyped up on saving the world, but for everyone else they were just getting on with their day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. But that doesn't disprove the physical impossibilities that occurred that day, it's an unanswered question deriving from it Agree a lot of people would have to be involved, how, why are they silent, Not something I have or any theory I'am aware off can answer But planes still leave debris, two jet engines hit a wall they tend to break a brick ot two, the towers where designed to withstand plane impact, then is loads of unanswered questions that mean We must question the official story until these are confirmed Until a theory is proven it's unproven, in both cases for and against the official story there are unanswered questions which mean it cannot he accepted until these are resolved " 1..It also dosent prove it. 2..They have one of the planes engines in the museum in NY. 3..How did they come about the footage of the planes hiting the towers. 4..So until anything is proved its a conspiracy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reaserch any "conspiracy" u shall seek the TRUTH example A. The twin towers.... So what is the theory? did the twin towers not exist in the first place? was it all CGI? I'll tell my cousin who was in one of the Towers at the time he's CGI. Your cousin never exsisted according to some " This made me laugh, thanks for that The only mention of CGI is in a challenge to the theory mindset. "was it all CGI" But you guys have run with it anyway, good skills | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Now we are here" princess of Wales " " I don't want to think about that too hard but I wouldn't be at all surprised. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Now we are here" princess of Wales " I don't want to think about that too hard but I wouldn't be at all surprised. " Well if she was to marry that would make the future king of England mum married to a Muslim , you could see that playing out !!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. But that doesn't disprove the physical impossibilities that occurred that day, it's an unanswered question deriving from it Agree a lot of people would have to be involved, how, why are they silent, Not something I have or any theory I'am aware off can answer But planes still leave debris, two jet engines hit a wall they tend to break a brick ot two, the towers where designed to withstand plane impact, then is loads of unanswered questions that mean We must question the official story until these are confirmed Until a theory is proven it's unproven, in both cases for and against the official story there are unanswered questions which mean it cannot he accepted until these are resolved 1..It also dosent prove it. 2..They have one of the planes engines in the museum in NY. 3..How did they come about the footage of the planes hiting the towers. 4..So until anything is proved its a conspiracy. " Exactly which makes the official story a conspiracy until the unanswered questions are resolved 2, four engines in total, 3, there has been people said that the planes that hit the towers had no windows, it's hear say and not provable so discounted, the ones that crash landed and hit the pentagon are the ones in question as they cannot have impacted without leaving a debris field, Consider if you will that you accept the physical impossibility that they left no debris we have to conclude they didn't crash there, so where did they go, where are the occupants As said above the truth will hurt a lot, Appreciate if you would rather not find it, just don't feel the need to label those that do to have their judgement clouded by drugs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My personal favourites are those that are all "it defies the laws of physics". There's a lot of phenomena in physics that doesn't seem to follow what we would call common sense or logic because there's a lot of subtle influencing factors, that you would understand if you were a physicist" Appreciate the point but it doesn't lend itself to kerosene melting items that would need a much higher temperature than kerosene can produce to melt, happening 4 times in one morning, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. But that doesn't disprove the physical impossibilities that occurred that day, it's an unanswered question deriving from it Agree a lot of people would have to be involved, how, why are they silent, Not something I have or any theory I'am aware off can answer But planes still leave debris, two jet engines hit a wall they tend to break a brick ot two, the towers where designed to withstand plane impact, then is loads of unanswered questions that mean We must question the official story until these are confirmed Until a theory is proven it's unproven, in both cases for and against the official story there are unanswered questions which mean it cannot he accepted until these are resolved " For me the theory of thousands upon thousands of people being (knowingly or unknowingly) involved in the cover up of something on this scale is more difficult to swallow than the official version. I just don't start from the position that the official version of events is necessarily a big lie or cover up. That's not to say that big lies and cover ups have never happened, but not on this scale. It's a leap too far for me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But its proven that people are clouded by the drugs they take...or is that also a conspiracy " Is that a real answer, if it is I'am done, The effects of drugs are not in question, your assumption that anyone who questions the official story must be negatively effected by them is, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved. But that doesn't disprove the physical impossibilities that occurred that day, it's an unanswered question deriving from it Agree a lot of people would have to be involved, how, why are they silent, Not something I have or any theory I'am aware off can answer But planes still leave debris, two jet engines hit a wall they tend to break a brick ot two, the towers where designed to withstand plane impact, then is loads of unanswered questions that mean We must question the official story until these are confirmed Until a theory is proven it's unproven, in both cases for and against the official story there are unanswered questions which mean it cannot he accepted until these are resolved For me the theory of thousands upon thousands of people being (knowingly or unknowingly) involved in the cover up of something on this scale is more difficult to swallow than the official version. I just don't start from the position that the official version of events is necessarily a big lie or cover up. That's not to say that big lies and cover ups have never happened, but not on this scale. It's a leap too far for me." Well said Miss | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"for me the theory of thousands upon thousands of people being (knowingly or unknowingly) involved in the cover up of something on this scale is more difficult to swallow than the official version. I just don't start from the position that the official version of events is necessarily a big lie or cover up. That's not to say that big lies and cover ups have never happened, but not on this scale. It's a leap too far for me." Understood, it's enough to make me.question the official story though, Kerosene cannot melt that which it does not burn hot enough to melt, Believing it did is a leap too far for me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My personal favourites are those that are all "it defies the laws of physics". There's a lot of phenomena in physics that doesn't seem to follow what we would call common sense or logic because there's a lot of subtle influencing factors, that you would understand if you were a physicist Appreciate the point but it doesn't lend itself to kerosene melting items that would need a much higher temperature than kerosene can produce to melt, happening 4 times in one morning," I dont know the finer details to the incident given I was 10 when it happened however you're assuming that the kerosene was the sole fuel source which it wont have been on impact. Factor in turbulent airflow, additional fuel sources ie any other combustible items, confinement and aerobic resources and any subsequent chemicals produced in the reactions that can burn themselves, you can get a fire burning hotter than a simple pure kerosene burn. Even metal burns under the right conditions without melting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But its proven that people are clouded by the drugs they take...or is that also a conspiracy Is that a real answer, if it is I'am done, The effects of drugs are not in question, your assumption that anyone who questions the official story must be negatively effected by them is," In my experience they are...but no its not the real answer...but its a better answer than saying it never happened...a bit like how were all being poisoned by the contrails from aircraft | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"for me the theory of thousands upon thousands of people being (knowingly or unknowingly) involved in the cover up of something on this scale is more difficult to swallow than the official version. I just don't start from the position that the official version of events is necessarily a big lie or cover up. That's not to say that big lies and cover ups have never happened, but not on this scale. It's a leap too far for me. Understood, it's enough to make me.question the official story though, Kerosene cannot melt that which it does not burn hot enough to melt, Believing it did is a leap too far for me" Can't it? Why aren't physicists and aviation fuel experts around the world up in arms about this every day? If there was a huge news story and the entire premise of it was hinged upon something which I knew as a result of my area of expertise wasn't possible, you can bet I'd spend as long as it took gathering irrefutable evidence to expose that lie. Where are they all? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"for me the theory of thousands upon thousands of people being (knowingly or unknowingly) involved in the cover up of something on this scale is more difficult to swallow than the official version. I just don't start from the position that the official version of events is necessarily a big lie or cover up. That's not to say that big lies and cover ups have never happened, but not on this scale. It's a leap too far for me. Understood, it's enough to make me.question the official story though, Kerosene cannot melt that which it does not burn hot enough to melt, Believing it did is a leap too far for me Can't it? Why aren't physicists and aviation fuel experts around the world up in arms about this every day? If there was a huge news story and the entire premise of it was hinged upon something which I knew as a result of my area of expertise wasn't possible, you can bet I'd spend as long as it took gathering irrefutable evidence to expose that lie. Where are they all? " exactly...and of course the plane burning up on the runway and melting never happened at Manchester either | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Next we will be saying there going to build a space station on the moon" Mars actually | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even metal burns under the right conditions without melting" I am not going to get into the silly twin towers didn't happen conspiracy. But on the subject of kerosene burn temperatures have to agree with Bageria, anyone who has used acetylene welding can tell you the effects of oxygen on burn temperature. Someone mentioned Thermite above, which is in essence iron oxide and aluminium oxide mixed with a combustion agent e.g. diesel. Bet both towers had lots of rusty iron and aluminium which burns plenty hot enough to vaporise most things and therefore turn them into combustible gas, just add oxygen which is quite abundant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kerosene cannot melt that which it does not burn hot enough to melt," "Can't it?" Well no Totally agree about the where are they point though, I have read of people making statements and losing their job etc buts it's hear say so ignored, wish whole heartedly truth could prevail either way so we can see\be sure the correct people are held accountable But my point remains, there are issues with both official and conspiracy offerings, so both are tangible and not to be accepted as fact until the unanswered questions are resolved satisfactorily | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even metal burns under the right conditions without melting I am not going to get into the silly twin towers didn't happen conspiracy. But on the subject of kerosene burn temperatures have to agree with Bageria, anyone who has used acetylene welding can tell you the effects of oxygen on burn temperature. Someone mentioned Thermite above, which is in essence iron oxide and aluminium oxide mixed with a combustion agent e.g. diesel. Bet both towers had lots of rusty iron and aluminium which burns plenty hot enough to vaporise most things and therefore turn them into combustible gas, just add oxygen which is quite abundant. " Along with all the other chemicals used and stored throughout the buildings. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oops shot Kennedy even the CIA aren't that mean" Haha, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Next we will be saying there going to build a space station on the moon" We won't be building one on the moon, there's already one there, and we were told to stay away | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? . What you mean like Hillsborough! Or like mk ultra The American government poisoning alcohol during prohibition to put the fear into folk! Operation north woods, where they planned to fly planes into buildings and blame it on Cubans! Deliberately Giving syphilus to black men for 30 years so they could see the results Trading cocaine for weapons so they could back guerrilla warfare! Oh wait you just mean the tin foil hat ones!... Like 911 and aliens " Oh come on, it's not a conspiracy any longer. Everybody now knows that 4 teenage aliens stole mom and dad's flying saucer and went out parting. They had a little to much to drink and came to earth to mess with the primates. When they got here they got themselves in a storm and crashed into a weather balloon just outside of Roswell New Mexico. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even metal burns under the right conditions without melting I am not going to get into the silly twin towers didn't happen conspiracy. But on the subject of kerosene burn temperatures have to agree with Bageria, anyone who has used acetylene welding can tell you the effects of oxygen on burn temperature. Someone mentioned Thermite above, which is in essence iron oxide and aluminium oxide mixed with a combustion agent e.g. diesel. Bet both towers had lots of rusty iron and aluminium which burns plenty hot enough to vaporise most things and therefore turn them into combustible gas, just add oxygen which is quite abundant. Along with all the other chemicals used and stored throughout the buildings. " Ok so not being argumentative but curious, I'am interested how would you explain the two engines hitting the pentagon and not leaving an impact mark | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Even metal burns under the right conditions without melting I am not going to get into the silly twin towers didn't happen conspiracy. But on the subject of kerosene burn temperatures have to agree with Bageria, anyone who has used acetylene welding can tell you the effects of oxygen on burn temperature. Someone mentioned Thermite above, which is in essence iron oxide and aluminium oxide mixed with a combustion agent e.g. diesel. Bet both towers had lots of rusty iron and aluminium which burns plenty hot enough to vaporise most things and therefore turn them into combustible gas, just add oxygen which is quite abundant. Along with all the other chemicals used and stored throughout the buildings. Ok so not being argumentative but curious, I'am interested how would you explain the two engines hitting the pentagon and not leaving an impact mark " I also look forward to the answer and also the answer to how/why the third WTC tower collapsed despite not being hit by a "plane" and not in the direct vicinity of the twin towers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A guy at my work place believes the earth is FLAT?? he is dead serious lol. Apparently there are loads of videos on YouTube which support his views. . Does he understand the concept of why you can see further when your up a hill " To which I have to ask, do you really understand the concept of flat? ( think in terms of curved space) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conspiracy theorists always seem so fucking angry and miserable. I don't take everything at face value but neither do I see a conspiracy in everything or start from the presumption that big business/the government/the CIA/whoever are out to get me. It seems a crap way to live your life and indicative of feeling frustrated or hard done by with your lot in life. " I could not have put it better myself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Conspiracy theories exist, so I believe in them. Do I believe in the truth of them - of course not, as a general response. Governments create and circulate propaganda and conspiracy theories, often to misdirect others, or to discredit other conspiracy theories, which may or may not have some basis in truth. If such agencies will go to great length to discredit conspiracy theories then I feel sure that will be some truth in some of them of course. Knowing which ones contain truth and are important is another matter. As the conspiracies are populated by garbage from such agencies, then they'll not all have any value - many will have none. But we do know that governments will take actions that aren't always seemingly legal or above board. Should we trust governments and conspiracy theorists absolutely - of course not!!" Add 'we should only take as fact what can be scientifically proven' and I fully agree, well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this Please don't. Can't deny the truth unfortunately Happy to continue to deny your version of the truth, thanks. I trust my own brain more than yours. Then I really worry for you Again...please don't. I'm a happy and contented person and no one is out to get me. " I think I'd quite like to get you, but only in the nicest possible way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think I'd quite like to get you, but only in the nicest possible way." There are some heads that would benefit from a tin hat though, haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'am interested how would you explain the two engines hitting the pentagon and not leaving an impact mark I also look forward to the answer and also the answer to how/why the third WTC tower collapsed despite not being hit by a "plane" and not in the direct vicinity of the twin towers" Are you though? Really? Either of you? Because my experience of conspiracy theorists is that anyone trying to correct their fallacies is just written off as being part of the conspiracy. Mr ddc Ps But then, I would say that, wouldn't I? {taps nose....} | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kerosene cannot melt that which it does not burn hot enough to melt, Can't it? Well no Totally agree about the where are they point though, I have read of people making statements and losing their job etc buts it's hear say so ignored, wish whole heartedly truth could prevail either way so we can see\be sure the correct people are held accountable But my point remains, there are issues with both official and conspiracy offerings, so both are tangible and not to be accepted as fact until the unanswered questions are resolved satisfactorily " Which truth. Your truth or someone elses? You seem to take a dim view of anyone elses theories/facts. I am an engineer and I do know a lot about the science of making shit go bang. Aside from the fuel there were many accelerants and environmental factors in the towers tragedy. And as for your statement about being built to withstand an aircraft strike, until it happened no civilian building anywhere was designed to resist a kinetic strike if that magnitude...the largest object they would have considered would have been a light aircraft /helicopter. Open your mind is a favourite term of all conspiracy/alternative theorists...However for a lot of them their scope is narrowed, just shifted from everyone elses. 9/11 happened. We all saw it. Real people who were alive are now dead. Theories wont change it. Fucking move on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? " I don't usually believe in conspiracy theories until it's proven, but I do believe there was at least a second gunman during the Kennedy assassination | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A guy at my work place believes the earth is FLAT?? he is dead serious lol. Apparently there are loads of videos on YouTube which support his views. . Does he understand the concept of why you can see further when your up a hill To which I have to ask, do you really understand the concept of flat? ( think in terms of curved space)" . No you've lost me? If earth was flat you'd be able to see further than 3 miles, you can't because that's the horizon of the curve If your up a hill say a 100 ft you can see a little further down the road.... Like 9 miles further | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you believe in conspiracy theories ? Or is that a rhetorical question ? . What you mean like Hillsborough! Or like mk ultra The American government poisoning alcohol during prohibition to put the fear into folk! Operation north woods, where they planned to fly planes into buildings and blame it on Cubans! Deliberately Giving syphilus to black men for 30 years so they could see the results Trading cocaine for weapons so they could back guerrilla warfare! Oh wait you just mean the tin foil hat ones!... Like 911 and aliens Oh come on, it's not a conspiracy any longer. Everybody now knows that 4 teenage aliens stole mom and dad's flying saucer and went out parting. They had a little to much to drink and came to earth to mess with the primates. When they got here they got themselves in a storm and crashed into a weather balloon just outside of Roswell New Mexico. " . My point was the first six examples were considered conspiracy theory's for years until recently! Some of the most outlandish stuff is true and some of what seams obvious is completely bollocks! I personally think that alien visitation in the past has been highly likely, that doesn't mean every sighting is true just that there's a small percentage of the thousands and thousands of reports that have no other logical conclusion than extra terrestrial | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"for me the theory of thousands upon thousands of people being (knowingly or unknowingly) involved in the cover up of something on this scale is more difficult to swallow than the official version. I just don't start from the position that the official version of events is necessarily a big lie or cover up. That's not to say that big lies and cover ups have never happened, but not on this scale. It's a leap too far for me. Understood, it's enough to make me.question the official story though, Kerosene cannot melt that which it does not burn hot enough to melt, Believing it did is a leap too far for me Can't it? Why aren't physicists and aviation fuel experts around the world up in arms about this every day? If there was a huge news story and the entire premise of it was hinged upon something which I knew as a result of my area of expertise wasn't possible, you can bet I'd spend as long as it took gathering irrefutable evidence to expose that lie. Where are they all? " . I don't know about the other stuff but.... There is a website run by pilots, who think that the official account of the planes flight path that hit the pentagon is impractical and not possible even by a highly trained pilot, there's several thousand pilots who've signed it that wish to protest the official account and want it re examined! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So theres thousands of people involved in this lie then That's the point. Something as big as "faking" 9/11 could never be kept secret because of the sheer numbers of people who would have to be involved." Ok so reduce the numbers. Think... how could it have happened with less people being involved. That's how more believable conspiracy theories are mounted, not just rubbish straw man ones that everyone and their dog can laugh at. I can see a clear path in which only a handful need have known... and even they might have known different things from each other. I would suggest giving up on the idea that any one person knew the whole thing was gonna turn out the way it did. I think there was an element of accident to the thing. But to me there was only one accident... not 172 or whatever the count of fuck ups the official story needs in order to work. And the passports of the hijackers found in the debris the next day sealed it to me, right there and then, that the whole thing was being stage managed... that and the news they were "pulling" WTC 7 on live TV before it went down... hmmmm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A guy at my work place believes the earth is FLAT?? he is dead serious lol. Apparently there are loads of videos on YouTube which support his views. " Does he watch them on a flat screen TV? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this" Please don't. I worked among the debris. It was not pleasant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this Please don't. Can't deny the truth unfortunately" Can you not see the irony of your own statement? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Now it's voddy o'clock I am warming to the flat earth theory, need to wait for a proper session before I tackle what holds it up " 4 elephants on the back of a giant space turtle...everyone knows this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Now it's voddy o'clock I am warming to the flat earth theory, need to wait for a proper session before I tackle what holds it up 4 elephants on the back of a giant space turtle...everyone knows this." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh crap, "dim view", I was going for 'discussing in a forum' oh well thanks for the heads up " Apologies, I took you for a daily mail reader so I used language you were familiar with. On this topic you are seeming to overrule people with alternative points of view, and ignoring valid points... But im an engineer. ..we love a good argument..doesn't mean I wouldn't buy you a pint | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are there never conspiracy theories about good stuff?" Aliens.....and now you can't post any more on your own thread.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are there never conspiracy theories about good stuff? Aliens.....and now you can't post any more on your own thread.... " Well, that was a glitch - pressed the wrong giant red button Anyway...NOW you can't post on your own thread anymore. Hehehehe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are there never conspiracy theories about good stuff? Aliens.....and now you can't post any more on your own thread.... Well, that was a glitch - pressed the wrong giant red button Anyway...NOW you can't post on your own thread anymore. Hehehehe. " Wtf?!?! It's a conspiracy! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are there never conspiracy theories about good stuff? Aliens.....and now you can't post any more on your own thread.... Well, that was a glitch - pressed the wrong giant red button Anyway...NOW you can't post on your own thread anymore. Hehehehe. Wtf?!?! It's a conspiracy! " Gotcha! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this" In your first sentence you use the words "is, definitely and opinion" The first two are positives, it starts to unravel when you throw in "opinion" So, are you an architect, civil or structural engineer, forensic investigator, examiner or anthropologist? Have you studied the construction issue drawings and compared them to the as installeds, looked at the O and M manuals, compared the specification with the material requisitions and delivery notes? Have you interviewed the witnesses and tested their statements? Same for the families of the survivors. If the answer is no, you have no knowledge base for your belief, there's no science or physics behind it to support it. It's no more than a picture of what your fertile imagination is drawing. Is the answer is yes, you're a weird mongrel cross of da vinci, Wrenn, Brunel, Gil Grissom and Dr Sheldon Cooper. If we meet on the way to market I've got some magic beans you can have....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this In your first sentence you use the words "is, definitely and opinion" The first two are positives, it starts to unravel when you throw in "opinion" So, are you an architect, civil or structural engineer, forensic investigator, examiner or anthropologist? Have you studied the construction issue drawings and compared them to the as installeds, looked at the O and M manuals, compared the specification with the material requisitions and delivery notes? Have you interviewed the witnesses and tested their statements? Same for the families of the survivors. If the answer is no, you have no knowledge base for your belief, there's no science or physics behind it to support it. It's no more than a picture of what your fertile imagination is drawing. Is the answer is yes, you're a weird mongrel cross of da vinci, Wrenn, Brunel, Gil Grissom and Dr Sheldon Cooper. If we meet on the way to market I've got some magic beans you can have......." Well said! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this In your first sentence you use the words "is, definitely and opinion" The first two are positives, it starts to unravel when you throw in "opinion" So, are you an architect, civil or structural engineer, forensic investigator, examiner or anthropologist? Have you studied the construction issue drawings and compared them to the as installeds, looked at the O and M manuals, compared the specification with the material requisitions and delivery notes? Have you interviewed the witnesses and tested their statements? Same for the families of the survivors. If the answer is no, you have no knowledge base for your belief, there's no science or physics behind it to support it. It's no more than a picture of what your fertile imagination is drawing. Is the answer is yes, you're a weird mongrel cross of da vinci, Wrenn, Brunel, Gil Grissom and Dr Sheldon Cooper. If we meet on the way to market I've got some magic beans you can have......." So you can't debunk the facts so you resort to name calling? The sign of an intellectual right there. Ok, next.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh crap, "dim view", I was going for 'discussing in a forum' oh well thanks for the heads up Apologies, I took you for a daily mail reader so I used language you were familiar with. On this topic you are seeming to overrule people with alternative points of view, and ignoring valid points... But im an engineer. ..we love a good argument..doesn't mean I wouldn't buy you a pint " All is good mate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"lol Had one of these a couple of weeks back and I got hammered for defending the possibilities of conspiracies... nice to see a better showing of tin hat wearing loonies this time As I said then, once you realise that the world is filled with people conspiring to achieve certain ends left right and centre... and that fuck ups really aren't half as prevalent... then the possibility that a few uber-conspiracies have at least been tried here or there starts to look more plausible... even if they haven't succeeded. Some conspiracy theories are really erected on the skimpiest of rumours or a little nugget of a fact... others, like some of the more advanced 911 theories are more like occam's razor... they make much more sense of all the little details than the official story. If I told you a few years ago that all our mobile phone information, our emails, and our internet use was being watched by the NSA and MI5 you would've labelled me a fruit cake... but here we are... welcome to the real world " If you told me a few days ago I would be agreeing with your good self today.....Haha But I very much do pal, well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this In your first sentence you use the words "is, definitely and opinion" The first two are positives, it starts to unravel when you throw in "opinion" So, are you an architect, civil or structural engineer, forensic investigator, examiner or anthropologist? Have you studied the construction issue drawings and compared them to the as installeds, looked at the O and M manuals, compared the specification with the material requisitions and delivery notes? Have you interviewed the witnesses and tested their statements? Same for the families of the survivors. If the answer is no, you have no knowledge base for your belief, there's no science or physics behind it to support it. It's no more than a picture of what your fertile imagination is drawing. Is the answer is yes, you're a weird mongrel cross of da vinci, Wrenn, Brunel, Gil Grissom and Dr Sheldon Cooper. If we meet on the way to market I've got some magic beans you can have....... So you can't debunk the facts so you resort to name calling? The sign of an intellectual right there. Ok, next...." I think he's debunked the theory quite well. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this In your first sentence you use the words "is, definitely and opinion" The first two are positives, it starts to unravel when you throw in "opinion" So, are you an architect, civil or structural engineer, forensic investigator, examiner or anthropologist? Have you studied the construction issue drawings and compared them to the as installeds, looked at the O and M manuals, compared the specification with the material requisitions and delivery notes? Have you interviewed the witnesses and tested their statements? Same for the families of the survivors. If the answer is no, you have no knowledge base for your belief, there's no science or physics behind it to support it. It's no more than a picture of what your fertile imagination is drawing. Is the answer is yes, you're a weird mongrel cross of da vinci, Wrenn, Brunel, Gil Grissom and Dr Sheldon Cooper. If we meet on the way to market I've got some magic beans you can have....... So you can't debunk the facts so you resort to name calling? The sign of an intellectual right there. Ok, next.... I think he's debunked the theory quite well. " He hasn't debunked any of the facts listed. Yes they are facts, there is proven scientific and documentary evidence proving them. Where is the evidence to disprove them? There isn't any - for example the bbc news report on live TV stating the third tower had collapsed when it was still visible in the background, are you going to tell me that that isn't evidence to verify said point? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I for one will be respecting the fact that tomorrow another year has passed since so many people lost their lives. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I for one will be respecting the fact that tomorrow another year has passed since so many people lost their lives. " Tomorrow isn't it. Didn't realise that I take issue with what it appears this statement is indicating though, wanting to know exactly what happened and that the correct people are held accountable does not diminish the atrocities that happened on that day, it was a disgraceful act and people needlessly lost their lives Regardless of a person's view of how it happened we are all effected by the actual act in the same way There are a lot of unanswered questions that need more investigation that's where I have left it anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this In your first sentence you use the words "is, definitely and opinion" The first two are positives, it starts to unravel when you throw in "opinion" So, are you an architect, civil or structural engineer, forensic investigator, examiner or anthropologist? Have you studied the construction issue drawings and compared them to the as installeds, looked at the O and M manuals, compared the specification with the material requisitions and delivery notes? Have you interviewed the witnesses and tested their statements? Same for the families of the survivors. If the answer is no, you have no knowledge base for your belief, there's no science or physics behind it to support it. It's no more than a picture of what your fertile imagination is drawing. Is the answer is yes, you're a weird mongrel cross of da vinci, Wrenn, Brunel, Gil Grissom and Dr Sheldon Cooper. If we meet on the way to market I've got some magic beans you can have....... So you can't debunk the facts so you resort to name calling? The sign of an intellectual right there. Ok, next.... I think he's debunked the theory quite well. He hasn't debunked any of the facts listed. Yes they are facts, there is proven scientific and documentary evidence proving them. Where is the evidence to disprove them? There isn't any - for example the bbc news report on live TV stating the third tower had collapsed when it was still visible in the background, are you going to tell me that that isn't evidence to verify said point? " I think the human element has to be taken into account. Imagine the masses of information coming in from hundreds of sources. The panic, confusion, the noise, dust and death. Any plan is great until firet contact...then it all goes to shit. I defy anyone to be perfect under those circumstances | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9/11 is the biggest conspiracy of them all. Definately (in my opinion NOT a terrorist act) Some facts which cannot be debunked - 1) Nano thermite (used in controlled explosions/demolitions) found in the dust at Ground Zero 2) Dick Cheney, US vice president, ordered a stand down command to the US air force 3) There is no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11 in fact the CIA created, trained and funded Al Qaeda/Taliban during the Mujahideen. Obama Bin Laden worked with the CIA under the name of Tim Osman 4) The twin towers were designed and built to withstand plane strikes as per world trade centre structural engineers Leslie Robertson and frank De martini 5) BBC correspondents reported the collapse of the third tower, WTC 7 20 minutes before it occurred I can go on and on with this In your first sentence you use the words "is, definitely and opinion" The first two are positives, it starts to unravel when you throw in "opinion" So, are you an architect, civil or structural engineer, forensic investigator, examiner or anthropologist? Have you studied the construction issue drawings and compared them to the as installeds, looked at the O and M manuals, compared the specification with the material requisitions and delivery notes? Have you interviewed the witnesses and tested their statements? Same for the families of the survivors. If the answer is no, you have no knowledge base for your belief, there's no science or physics behind it to support it. It's no more than a picture of what your fertile imagination is drawing. Is the answer is yes, you're a weird mongrel cross of da vinci, Wrenn, Brunel, Gil Grissom and Dr Sheldon Cooper. If we meet on the way to market I've got some magic beans you can have....... So you can't debunk the facts so you resort to name calling? The sign of an intellectual right there. Ok, next.... I think he's debunked the theory quite well. He hasn't debunked any of the facts listed. Yes they are facts, there is proven scientific and documentary evidence proving them. Where is the evidence to disprove them? There isn't any - for example the bbc news report on live TV stating the third tower had collapsed when it was still visible in the background, are you going to tell me that that isn't evidence to verify said point? I think the human element has to be taken into account. Imagine the masses of information coming in from hundreds of sources. The panic, confusion, the noise, dust and death. Any plan is great until firet contact...then it all goes to shit. I defy anyone to be perfect under those circumstances" That's bad, that's really really bad. Everyone will agree on that. People, innocent people, being caught up in it is just horrible. Agreed. But if I were one of their relatives I'd demand to know the truth. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I for one will be respecting the fact that tomorrow another year has passed since so many people lost their lives. Tomorrow isn't it. Didn't realise that I take issue with what it appears this statement is indicating though, wanting to know exactly what happened and that the correct people are held accountable does not diminish the atrocities that happened on that day, it was a disgraceful act and people needlessly lost their lives Regardless of a person's view of how it happened we are all effected by the actual act in the same way There are a lot of unanswered questions that need more investigation that's where I have left it anyway " For me it's the pissing about with little theories in the way of a hobby, about an event in which so many people died, that feels distasteful. If you actually want to effect change, what are you doing to try to encourage more investigation of what you feel so strongly about? Petitioning the government, writing to your MP? Sending your evidence to investigative journalists? Educating yourself about the science behind what you claim to have proved to be a lie? Or are you just mumbling about it to random strangers on the Internet? Yes there have been government cover ups before. But I'm pretty sure the truth about Hillsbrough et al didn't come out as a result this kind of stuff, but as a result of a concerted campaign by those actually affected by it, the families. You don't hear so many of the 9/11 families spreading this kind of rumour. Or are they being silenced too? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I for one will be respecting the fact that tomorrow another year has passed since so many people lost their lives. Tomorrow isn't it. Didn't realise that I take issue with what it appears this statement is indicating though, " My statement is not indicating anything other than I will pay my respects tomorrow to all that lost their lives, I'm not sure what the issue is with that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I for one will be respecting the fact that tomorrow another year has passed since so many people lost their lives. Tomorrow isn't it. Didn't realise that I take issue with what it appears this statement is indicating though, wanting to know exactly what happened and that the correct people are held accountable does not diminish the atrocities that happened on that day, it was a disgraceful act and people needlessly lost their lives Regardless of a person's view of how it happened we are all effected by the actual act in the same way There are a lot of unanswered questions that need more investigation that's where I have left it anyway For me it's the pissing about with little theories in the way of a hobby, about an event in which so many people died, that feels distasteful. If you actually want to effect change, what are you doing to try to encourage more investigation of what you feel so strongly about? Petitioning the government, writing to your MP? Sending your evidence to investigative journalists? Educating yourself about the science behind what you claim to have proved to be a lie? Or are you just mumbling about it to random strangers on the Internet? Yes there have been government cover ups before. But I'm pretty sure the truth about Hillsbrough et al didn't come out as a result this kind of stuff, but as a result of a concerted campaign by those actually affected by it, the families. You don't hear so many of the 9/11 families spreading this kind of rumour. Or are they being silenced too?" I have stated already that I don't have the answer to the silence, other than the online petitions signed by pilots engineers all asking for an independent review there is a lot of people quiet, Could it be that anyone questioning the official story is slammed as a tin hat wearing druggie and not worth the agro, not my place to say or pass judgment on how people react, I have tried to take on people's views on this discussion but it is a personal thing and people do take the view that to question is to disrespect My personal activity was to educate myself make an informed decision and sign the petitions accordingly You will have to excuse me a little if I jump to the defense of those that question when they are being labelled tin hat wearing junkies Not continuing this debate though as it touching on something we all have feelings for and it's all going a bit aggressive So I'll be backing out now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I for one will be respecting the fact that tomorrow another year has passed since so many people lost their lives. Tomorrow isn't it. Didn't realise that I take issue with what it appears this statement is indicating though, My statement is not indicating anything other than I will pay my respects tomorrow to all that lost their lives, I'm not sure what the issue is with that. " Then yes I fully agree, such a sad unnecessary loss of life, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well I for one will be respecting the fact that tomorrow another year has passed since so many people lost their lives. Tomorrow isn't it. Didn't realise that I take issue with what it appears this statement is indicating though, wanting to know exactly what happened and that the correct people are held accountable does not diminish the atrocities that happened on that day, it was a disgraceful act and people needlessly lost their lives Regardless of a person's view of how it happened we are all effected by the actual act in the same way There are a lot of unanswered questions that need more investigation that's where I have left it anyway For me it's the pissing about with little theories in the way of a hobby, about an event in which so many people died, that feels distasteful. If you actually want to effect change, what are you doing to try to encourage more investigation of what you feel so strongly about? Petitioning the government, writing to your MP? Sending your evidence to investigative journalists? Educating yourself about the science behind what you claim to have proved to be a lie? Or are you just mumbling about it to random strangers on the Internet? Yes there have been government cover ups before. But I'm pretty sure the truth about Hillsbrough et al didn't come out as a result this kind of stuff, but as a result of a concerted campaign by those actually affected by it, the families. You don't hear so many of the 9/11 families spreading this kind of rumour. Or are they being silenced too? I have stated already that I don't have the answer to the silence, other than the online petitions signed by pilots engineers all asking for an independent review there is a lot of people quiet, Could it be that anyone questioning the official story is slammed as a tin hat wearing druggie and not worth the agro, not my place to say or pass judgment on how people react, I have tried to take on people's views on this discussion but it is a personal thing and people do take the view that to question is to disrespect My personal activity was to educate myself make an informed decision and sign the petitions accordingly You will have to excuse me a little if I jump to the defense of those that question when they are being labelled tin hat wearing junkies Not continuing this debate though as it touching on something we all have feelings for and it's all going a bit aggressive So I'll be backing out now" Ok however review my posts and you'll see I haven't been aggressive or labelled anyone as a tin-hat wearing junkie. Perhaps you could be as guilty of belittling and lumping together into one group all of those who think that maybe, just sometimes, the official version is pretty much right? Have a good day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was a general response about the thread not personal entirely to you, Too many unanswered questions. Good diddly day to you too. Haha ?? " Ignore the ?? Wasn't intentional, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |