 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Do you think fab should have a swipe yes/no meet section for quicker interaction? Seems to work on many other sites and you can message the ones that say yes to you, if you don't like then just pass by |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do you think fab should have a swipe yes/no meet section for quicker interaction? Seems to work on many other sites and you can message the ones that say yes to you, if you don't like then just pass by"
Not like a wink then ?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Ooh is that how Tinder works? Never been anywhere near it but that could be hugely demoralising if Fab ever brought that in with my ugly mug. No, no, no, no, no, no .. etc before I even have a chance to start.
It's a thumbs down from me!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
As it's a swinging site and not everyone likes their faces on show I think only a few people and possibly mainly single people would want to be included. As stated above,there's already those kind of apps for single people. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I don't think I like the idea. People complain a lot that their profiles aren't read, and I think this would increase that. Users would likely get an increase in inappropriate users messaging them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
People on here tend to like others making an effort for them. Never used tinder but i can see how it's handy for people who just want a hassle free meet or easy way for them to find out who is interested in them. Might work for some users yeah. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We like the idea , we use a couple of swingers apps that do this but there aren't many users yet.
And for us as it's about the fun and sex and we do make decisions based on how the person looks before reading the profile. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"We like the idea , we use a couple of swingers apps that do this but there aren't many users yet.
And for us as it's about the fun and sex and we do make decisions based on how the person looks before reading the profile. "
That's the thing, most profiles say there has to be an attraction, so this would surely dirt that out and sort! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
90% of what you'll see is dick pics or vag shots, so it'll predominantly be comparing them not the full package. I like the idea that you both have to like each other before you can message, however, my preferences in terms of what I like looking at online compared to who I like chatting to and getting it on with in person are worlds apart usually, so it's not a true representation |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Fab should keep this site but when iTunes allows it should create a tinder style swinging app to compliment it They would rake it in . As let's face it every dating app out there is sex based why not just have a sex app for all those pretending they want to date |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly "
How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don't think I like the idea. People complain a lot that their profiles aren't read, and I think this would increase that. Users would likely get an increase in inappropriate users messaging them. "
No they wouldn't - messages could only be sent if both people swipe yes so in fact there might even be less unsolicited messages |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly
How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea "
Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly
How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea
Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people"
Your point is also logical sir |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly
How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea
Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people
Your point is also logical sir"
This is why you'd have the option to use the facility |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly
How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea
Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people
Your point is also logical sir
This is why you'd have the option to use the facility "
Ah, so less like tinder, more like badoo, which is (in my opinion) the crossover app between tinder and fab (but lacking a casual option in looking for and I prefer the meet option of fab anyway) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly
How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea
Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people
Your point is also logical sir
This is why you'd have the option to use the facility
Ah, so less like tinder, more like badoo, which is (in my opinion) the crossover app between tinder and fab (but lacking a casual option in looking for and I prefer the meet option of fab anyway)"
Pretty much, badoo like many others used to be a lot better than it is now. All the clearly fake profiles are just laughable these days, I mean, I live near Leeds and I know there is no beach or palm trees!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Swiping pics is possibly the worse idea I've heard suggested for fab. You might have missed the point of fab possibly
How has he missed the point? The main point of fab is to fuck people (to put it bluntly) so swiping for yes/no is a logical idea
Logical, but flawed, because not all humans are logical and swiping like at one moment, does not necessarily mean that the person will want to fuck the brains out of the other person at the same time they swipe back. So I disagree because people may be after fb fwb or partners on here, but not everyone, and that system is more for regular meets with the same people
Your point is also logical sir
This is why you'd have the option to use the facility
Ah, so less like tinder, more like badoo, which is (in my opinion) the crossover app between tinder and fab (but lacking a casual option in looking for and I prefer the meet option of fab anyway)
Pretty much, badoo like many others used to be a lot better than it is now. All the clearly fake profiles are just laughable these days, I mean, I live near Leeds and I know there is no beach or palm trees!! "
Really? But Leeds is such a tropical city. Surely the swallows got the coconuts from there  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Could have the option to opt in it like find by phone, so only those profiles were shown "
Sounds like a good idea if you could opt in. I wouldn't personally but I think its a good idea for sites like this to remain current and attractive to a good mix of people. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
