FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Look! Over there!
Look! Over there!
Jump to: Newest in thread
What suggestions do you have for distracting two teenage children when your partner suggests a good location for a fab-style photo, and going back later just isn't an option?
Mr ddc
(I'll have to check back for answers later, as waving 'bye' to free internet for a bit) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us"
I took it that the OP was somewhere and about to take some pics and the teenagers appeared and are loitering.
If, however, they took the teenagers with them I agree, it would be the blast thing on my mind too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What suggestions do you have for distracting two teenage children when your partner suggests a good location for a fab-style photo, and going back later just isn't an option?
Mr ddc
(I'll have to check back for answers later, as waving 'bye' to free internet for a bit)"
Oh no you just mentioned children and fab.
Let the knew jerk morality commence.
You will learn that there is one acceptable social media opinion regarding children and you must have no thoughts on any subject other than how "special and perfect" they are according to arbitrary social media morality.
Under no circumstances must you act like a normal human being and have a variety of thoughts about your life when there is a child nearby. It says so in the Sun newspaper. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
This!
Oooh, this is going well!
Lighten up, peeps, even the churches have pics with boobies in here!
 "
Oooh are you somewhere exotic?
Can't you just slip them a fiver and send them off to buy ice creams? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
This!
Oooh, this is going well!
Lighten up, peeps, even the churches have pics with boobies in here!
"
.
Have you tried money!
I find it nearly always works with them  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
This!
Oooh, this is going well!
Lighten up, peeps, even the churches have pics with boobies in here!
Oooh are you somewhere exotic?
Can't you just slip them a fiver and send them off to buy ice creams?"
.
I think Mr D,s kids are teenagers?
He'd be better off bribing them with WiFi |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What suggestions do you have for distracting two teenage children when your partner suggests a good location for a fab-style photo, and going back later just isn't an option?
Mr ddc
(I'll have to check back for answers later, as waving 'bye' to free internet for a bit)
Oh no you just mentioned children and fab.
Let the knew jerk morality commence.
You will learn that there is one acceptable social media opinion regarding children and you must have no thoughts on any subject other than how "special and perfect" they are according to arbitrary social media morality.
Under no circumstances must you act like a normal human being and have a variety of thoughts about your life when there is a child nearby. It says so in the Sun newspaper. "
So now wanting a fab style photo is normal behaviour? This is getting interesting - my teenagers are never around - two are working and one is on holiday, yet not posing for any photos yet .... should I be? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What suggestions do you have for distracting two teenage children when your partner suggests a good location for a fab-style photo, and going back later just isn't an option?
Mr ddc
(I'll have to check back for answers later, as waving 'bye' to free internet for a bit)
Oh no you just mentioned children and fab.
Let the knew jerk morality commence.
You will learn that there is one acceptable social media opinion regarding children and you must have no thoughts on any subject other than how "special and perfect" they are according to arbitrary social media morality.
Under no circumstances must you act like a normal human being and have a variety of thoughts about your life when there is a child nearby. It says so in the Sun newspaper.
So now wanting a fab style photo is normal behaviour? This is getting interesting - my teenagers are never around - two are working and one is on holiday, yet not posing for any photos yet .... should I be? "
No. Because you don't want to. Doesn't mean other people cannot behave differently to you.
It is almost as if different people do different things at different times. Crazy I know.
Different does not mean bad. It means different. We don't need to automatically decry anything we do not do ourselves.
Personally nothing could make me think less about sex than a teenager. They are rank little pricks. However others are perfectly entitled to think what they want when they want. That is what free society is. Doesn't make them unacceptable. Just different. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Just like the people who have their wedding photo as their face picture or avatars I feel that fab and some aspects of your life don't mix. That's just me though and as long as nobody is hurt or affected I can't see the harm in dropping the kids a twenty and telling them to come back in an hour. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us"
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post! "
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?"
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *inaTitzTV/TS
over a year ago
Titz Towers, North Notts |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post! "
I agree.
I understand shouting, 'Look over there! A three headed monkey!' is pretty effective in the short term.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you. "
@NC
An attempt to be 'funny' I assume based on other comments this morning.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you. "
It worries me that I need to point out the sarcasm.
Not that you never noticed it, that is my fault for not making it clear. But more the fact that a post as ridiculous as mine was taken seriously even slightly suggests that rhetoric of this nature is not as uncommon as one might hope. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you.
@NC
An attempt to be 'funny' I assume based on other comments this morning...."
Thanks for the quotation marks. Makes my ego glow with pride.
Less funny more ironic but yes, it was not even slightly serious.
I don't waste everyone's time trying to be funny. I am dreadful at it and Lu shouts at me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What suggestions do you have for distracting two teenage children when your partner suggests a good location for a fab-style photo, and going back later just isn't an option?
Mr ddc
(I'll have to check back for answers later, as waving 'bye' to free internet for a bit)"
I bet when you finally check back you wasn't expecting THIS hey? 
Gotta love the forums! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why does every thread except 'tits out tuesday' and 'what's for tea?', wind up as a morality punch-up?
It was an innocent enough question....."
This is a forum. We are here to be better than you.
You are wrong. I am right. Bask in my magnificent aura.
Or words to that effect.
If you want reasoned discourse and intelligent debate, try Radio 4. You are in the wrong place.
Bow down to my superior morals |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Jesus christ people, get a grip on yourselves!
You're meant to be over 18 to be on here, not acting like whiny, petulant little school kids trying to one-up each others comments with something even more pious than the last!
Tell you what, let's calm things down with the sort of question that usually gets loads of replies and everyone having fun. We've got a dog, what sort of animals do YOU like?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you.
It worries me that I need to point out the sarcasm.
Not that you never noticed it, that is my fault for not making it clear. But more the fact that a post as ridiculous as mine was taken seriously even slightly suggests that rhetoric of this nature is not as uncommon as one might hope."
Other people may be being ironic too though - my oldest told his brother, don't ask mum about sex, she knows nothing, I know more than she does .... he's 18 now, but that was a good while ago - okay, should I be worried?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why does every thread except 'tits out tuesday' and 'what's for tea?', wind up as a morality punch-up?
It was an innocent enough question.....
This is a forum. We are here to be better than you.
You are wrong. I am right. Bask in my magnificent aura.
Or words to that effect.
If you want reasoned discourse and intelligent debate, try Radio 4. You are in the wrong place.
Bow down to my superior morals"
ha ha the morality squad is on its high horse again, they can turn a simple funny debate into a serious slagging match in the blink of an eye haaaaaaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha suck my sausage!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why does every thread except 'tits out tuesday' and 'what's for tea?', wind up as a morality punch-up?
It was an innocent enough question.....
This is a forum. We are here to be better than you.
You are wrong. I am right. Bask in my magnificent aura.
Or words to that effect.
If you want reasoned discourse and intelligent debate, try Radio 4. You are in the wrong place.
Bow down to my superior morals"
There are so few of the forums that debate and banter is allowed these days ... being sold to shush up is normal here now ... that is why I am posting on my single as opposed to couple profile, fine for me to be known as a Nutter, but not fair on Mr, as he is at work and oblivious to the havoc I can bring upon certain situations, ... well, maybe not ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you.
It worries me that I need to point out the sarcasm.
Not that you never noticed it, that is my fault for not making it clear. But more the fact that a post as ridiculous as mine was taken seriously even slightly suggests that rhetoric of this nature is not as uncommon as one might hope."
I'm sorry. I thought it was out of character for you.
My only defence is that I have bereavement "stuff" going on so might not have my sarcasm and amusing head on straight. Mea culpa.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I know how you feel OP, i hardly ever get a break from my kids, and my oldest was the biggest cockblocker for me last year because he had no job. Dunno how you distract them really, luckily my kids just enjoy going off and doing their own things most of the time. I just had to give up a lot of what i wanted for them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
OP, reminds me of the time when me & my sister were little at the Zoo ~ in order to distract us from the shagging Zebras my mum shouted 'look at the rhinos" who were of course having sex with a lot more gusto & noise than the zebras were... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"OP, reminds me of the time when me & my sister were little at the Zoo ~ in order to distract us from the shagging Zebras my mum shouted 'look at the rhinos" who were of course having sex with a lot more gusto & noise than the zebras were... "
Haha classic!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you.
It worries me that I need to point out the sarcasm.
Not that you never noticed it, that is my fault for not making it clear. But more the fact that a post as ridiculous as mine was taken seriously even slightly suggests that rhetoric of this nature is not as uncommon as one might hope.
I'm sorry. I thought it was out of character for you.
My only defence is that I have bereavement "stuff" going on so might not have my sarcasm and amusing head on straight. Mea culpa. "
Don't worry that one was not your fault. Irony and sarcasm is hard to get across with text and it is incumbent on the writer to ensure it does. It was my mistake. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Fab pics would be the last thing on our minds if we had children of any age with us
To be fair to the OP they were not suggesting doing anything in front of the teenagers, in fact the opposite. In a light hearted post!
You cannot mention children and sex in the same paragraph. In fact there must be a 3 paragraph buffer between any meniton of sex and any discussion of anyone under 18. Any less and you are a paedophile.
Also, teenagers don't have any sexual knowledge or feelings. None whatsoever. And to say that anyone under 25 does is paedophilia. Are you a paedophile? Are you? Are you?
Steady on! Everyone is entitled to an opinion on here and the only person to make the connection between paedophilia and this thread is you.
It worries me that I need to point out the sarcasm.
Not that you never noticed it, that is my fault for not making it clear. But more the fact that a post as ridiculous as mine was taken seriously even slightly suggests that rhetoric of this nature is not as uncommon as one might hope.
I'm sorry. I thought it was out of character for you.
My only defence is that I have bereavement "stuff" going on so might not have my sarcasm and amusing head on straight. Mea culpa.
Don't worry that one was not your fault. Irony and sarcasm is hard to get across with text and it is incumbent on the writer to ensure it does. It was my mistake. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Mr ddc
(I'll have to check back for answers later, as waving 'bye' to free internet for a bit)
I bet when you finally check back you wasn't expecting THIS hey?
Gotta love the forums! "
Ain't that the truth, Dan
Anyhoo,
We managed to sneak a pic on the city walls of Avila, all very tasteful like, and not a hint of paedophilia, and another by some very photogenic graffiti in Cordoba which I am sure was sprayed by someone over 18.
But you'll all have to wait a couple more weeks till we're back in Blighty before you can totally exonerate us from the need to be strung up!
Mr ddc |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
