FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Fab swingers in the Daily Star..
Fab swingers in the Daily Star..
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.
So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?"
No I wouldn't, but didn't they meet the couple?. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.
As I say, a bit shit. "
And also a reminder to watch yr back |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.
As I say, a bit shit. "
Ah yes I get it now, abit slow there, but yes its still wrong to expose them like that don't you recon?. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.
As I say, a bit shit.
And also a reminder to watch yr back"
That's right as well |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *heRainManMan
over a year ago
Warrington & Glasgow |
About the level of "journalism" that you'd expect from the tabloids!
But did anyone else find it amusing that immediately below the article there was a link to another titled "Glastonbury Surprise: Libertines rumoured to fill empty Pyramid Stage slot"? That couldn't have been entirely accidental, could it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"About the level of "journalism" that you'd expect from the tabloids!
But did anyone else find it amusing that immediately below the article there was a link to another titled "Glastonbury Surprise: Libertines rumoured to fill empty Pyramid Stage slot"? That couldn't have been entirely accidental, could it?"
So, our old friend Lib 'slotted' the heavenly pyramid at Glasto, eh?
On ye mate!!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I work with (against) journalists all day.
They are scum.
Sadface.  "
They're not all scum, just a vast majority seem to be. I'm sure there are some 95% human ones   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent? "
The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.
Be cautious. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent? "
I was wondering that, if they are on their profile as public pictures, then I would assume so as they are already out in the public domain, albeit the public domain of fab which anyone can join. If they were private pics for friends only, not sure what the stance would be  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?
I was wondering that, if they are on their profile as public pictures, then I would assume so as they are already out in the public domain, albeit the public domain of fab which anyone can join. If they were private pics for friends only, not sure what the stance would be "
The article talks of the journo being messaged pics - if these are private not public and sent by message or text could these fall under the new laws? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The article talks of the journo being messaged pics - if these are private not public and sent by message or text could these fall under the new laws? "
I very much doubt it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So, our old friend Lib 'slotted' the heavenly pyramid at Glasto, eh?
On ye mate!!
I was pretty good to if I do say so myself."
Did you sway a lantern to & fro in perfect harmony with the slotting? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Shock horror... couple use specialist members only website to arrange to do something with other members who would also like to do those things behind closed doors and away from the public eye... all without anyone knowing.
That's disgusting!!!! Those perverted exhibitionists... flashing their bits around in utter privacy like that.
What excellent journalism. Next they'll be telling me that some couples get naked when they go to bed... disgusting! absolutely disgusting  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Shock horror... couple use specialist members only website to arrange to do something with other members who would also like to do those things behind closed doors and away from the public eye... all without anyone knowing.
That's disgusting!!!! Those perverted exhibitionists... flashing their bits around in utter privacy like that.
What excellent journalism. Next they'll be telling me that some couples get naked when they go to bed... disgusting! absolutely disgusting "
Well, seeing as you put it like that.....  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"does it say what he done right to get a meet so easily "
Supposedly they had a large luxury motor home at Glastonbury with a (drum roll)........... SHOWER!!!
Just imagine all the peeps who showed up, had a shower & fucked right off!!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Anyone else seen this ?
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/450594/Glastonbury-Festival-sex-mad-swingers
"
Shows how interested folks are though. Zero FB, Twitter etc likes and no shared links.
People just don't care. It's not news anymore. Not that it ever really was.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)"
That could so easily be done, as we all know!
This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)
That could so easily be done, as we all know!
This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!! "
have you tried swatting flies with a bidet ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)
That could so easily be done, as we all know!
This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!!
have you tried swatting flies with a bidet ?"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
So is the next expose going to be a single mum on plenty of fish?
What is the legal premise for this?
They are not famous so no public interest claim.
What did they do to deserve this exposure.
Blurred pics spread nationally did they give permission for republication?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So is the next expose going to be a single mum on plenty of fish?
What is the legal premise for this?
They are not famous so no public interest claim.
What did they do to deserve this exposure.
Blurred pics spread nationally did they give permission for republication?
"
for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anyone know the couple? ie are they real or was the profile made up to then create the story? (If that makes sense)
That could so easily be done, as we all know!
This is why I would never, EVER buy a tabloid, even if I had run out of toilet paper, - I'd rather go out & buy a bidet!!
have you tried swatting flies with a bidet ?"
Shit, I didn't really think that through, did I. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?
The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.
Be cautious."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andom2chatMan
over a year ago
A Galaxy Far, Far Away & Spain |
"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.
So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?"
I'm pretty sure a married CEO of the paper having an affair with his single mum employee would get more attention from the public if I let that out into the public domain. He has much more to lose than I do if they come after me. So come on - take your best shot. What's good for the goose... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?
The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.
Be cautious."
m.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/406080
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So legally where would these people stand? Are the press allowed to publish pictures from this couple without consent?
The images are in the public domain by being on the internet as far as I know.
Be cautious.
m.fabswingers.com/forum/feedback/406080
"
Fabswingers.com site feedback forum section.
'Stolen photos policy' thread. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *arry247Couple
over a year ago
Wakefield |
"
for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone "
Fab is not in the public domain it is a private members forum.
the Star should have obtained consent to publish the pictures sent to the journalist.
The data protection act protects the pictures and the couples privacy in such cases.
There have been cases of papers losing when they have photographed people in the street entering gyms etc. as it is a breach of their rights.
If the couple are still on Fab perhaps they might comment on whether they gave consent to publish or not, I suspect they did. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone
Fab is not in the public domain it is a private members forum.
the Star should have obtained consent to publish the pictures sent to the journalist.
The data protection act protects the pictures and the couples privacy in such cases.
There have been cases of papers losing when they have photographed people in the street entering gyms etc. as it is a breach of their rights.
If the couple are still on Fab perhaps they might comment on whether they gave consent to publish or not, I suspect they did."
If the couple actually existed.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It once again proves that the titillation of the frustrated vanilla world is needed to sell scandal rags.
This journalistic slime is to provide vicarious exitement for those poor individuals who are so indoctrinated with sexually repressive thoughts that they need to read about other peoples sex lives to get a semi-hardon.
The paper needs to balance this article now with one about how a couple have not had sex for 14 years and how the wife has never experienced sexual pleasure.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
for a start, legally if you put something in the public domain it is open to fair use. The dumb ass legal warning that people copy n paste offers no protection in law. If you want to spend 10's of thousands on a legal team for a case that you cant win, go ahead. I would imagine that the journalist, ahem, created the jim jane profile themselves and used a photo from their stock.The whole article is i imagine a fiction. face pic tuesday anyone
Fab is not in the public domain it is a private members forum.
the Star should have obtained consent to publish the pictures sent to the journalist.
The data protection act protects the pictures and the couples privacy in such cases.
There have been cases of papers losing when they have photographed people in the street entering gyms etc. as it is a breach of their rights.
If the couple are still on Fab perhaps they might comment on whether they gave consent to publish or not, I suspect they did."
as far as i am aware fab is not a private members forum. Non users are able to view the site and profiles.
It is not against the law to take photographs of people in a public space.unless of course you are harrassing them or shoving a camera into their face or stopping them from going about their business. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Is it me.... Or is it a coincidence that the pictured profile was 'new'? Could the article be the actual reporter just stooping low to get into press? You may find the reporter himself is a member of fab!!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *bi HaiveMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Cheeseville, Somerset |
"Is it me.... Or is it a coincidence that the pictured profile was 'new'? Could the article be the actual reporter just stooping low to get into press? You may find the reporter himself is a member of fab!!
"
Exactly what I posted two weeks ago.
New profile.
Now gone.
Maybe some pages needed filling with more shite.
A |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
About 4 years ago a new club opened up near spaghetti junction,was on the industrial side of the road backing on to the Bham_Fazeley canal in the shadows of the M6 motorway,one evening some "Newbies" turned up and were mingling chatting to the others there and on sunday the local paper had an "Expose" of a swingers club which had not inteferred with locals living on the other side of the road at all as there was a barrier running down the centre of the road leading cars to the flyover of the M6 & spaghetti junction so no cars were annoyingly parked there but well clear,no one had known it was a swingers club in the previous 12 months it had been there!.
The club then moved to another part of town. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.
So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?"
Yeah I might get a meet.
If you're worried about being outed you probably shouldn't be on here, because if you think you're doing something wrong, then it's obvious others will too.
Plus who gives a shit if you are a swinger?
"oh but I could lose my job and reputation "
shut up (not you personally) you ain't that important. No one cares.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So basically the newspaper steals pics, they can get done for that, at least they had fun there lol.
So if they printed your antics & pics you'd be happy with that?
Yeah I might get a meet.
If you're worried about being outed you probably shouldn't be on here, because if you think you're doing something wrong, then it's obvious others will too.
Plus who gives a shit if you are a swinger?
"oh but I could lose my job and reputation "
shut up (not you personally) you ain't that important. No one cares.
"
People have been outed and have lost jobs, family and friends. If you have none of those then that's such a shame. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm suggesting for their next article they talk about the moral depravity of porn... followed by a nice gallery of porn photos just to illustrate the point.
Oooo how morally depraved... cor just look at them tits. How awful... where can I find more? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It certainly makes it clearer how the debauchery... the depravity... is the journalist's doing. And, in that sense, the terrorism being advertised by tabloids is often their doing too.
Back in the 80's the government banned the IRA from being in the news because they recognised how the media was giving them oxygen. We could do with some enlightened thinking like that again.
Terrorists just kill a few people... it's the media who terrorise entire populations  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It certainly makes it clearer how the debauchery... the depravity... is the journalist's doing. And, in that sense, the terrorism being advertised by tabloids is often their doing too.
Back in the 80's the government banned the IRA from being in the news because they recognised how the media was giving them oxygen. We could do with some enlightened thinking like that again.
Terrorists just kill a few people... it's the media who terrorise entire populations "
Agreed. 24hr news channels ramp it up too. A bit like the 7/7 coverage last week. All for memorials etc but that was relentless, non stop, as if it had just happened.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.
As I say, a bit shit. "
And yet people just love face pic Friday.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The 'article' doesn't say that, what it says is that their reporter, Jim, contacted them (so the fucker's floating round on here, or was...) then strung them along.
As I say, a bit shit.
And yet people just love face pic Friday...."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
After scrolling through their mobile website it would seem that's all the rag is trying to sell nowadays 
