FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Black guys referred to as coloured guys
Black guys referred to as coloured guys
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious...." I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. | |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious...." It is a descriptive thing. If a crime were committed and there were witnesses. Anyway I see the person first. There are lovely everybodies. | |||
" Why do black people still call themselves black or black***** in this day and age? Aren't people people? Especially when, at best, they're half white? Is that not disrespectful to the white parent, frequently the mother. And how many, many generations must pass before African/American is no longer relevant. yrs sincerely Neanderthal Joe " Because they're allowed to be proud of their heritage, as are you regardless of people saying you can be proud to be black but not white. I'm a straight, white, English man and I'm proud of it, anybody that calls me racist or sexist or homophobic because of that is wrong | |||
| |||
| |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious...." I don't think any malice can be in the term 'coloured', though I think it's more Americans that use that term than Brits. Once was watching Question Time (yes exciting times eh) with a black friend of mine and one of the audience was a black woman who chided someone for using the term 'black', she said to use 'Afro-Carribean' instead. My mate looked at me and 'what the hell is wrong with being black?' I read a Spike Milligan book recently, a part of his autobiography, and he referred to a certain racial group in India as 'wogs'. In those days these terms were not derogatory, they merely identified a particular caste or ethnic group. Spike was born in India, and loved the country and its people very much, but someone reading that book today might consider him racist, and they'd be very wrong. An older chap that used to use our local pub often used the term that begins with 'n' to describe black people (never in a nasty way), and I once saw him fighting for the honour of a black guy that used to come in our pub when some (the real type of) racists were giving him abuse. It's such a touchy subject and people over-react to it in an effort to prove that they aren't racist. It becomes so bad that people have to choose what words they say not to be labelled as racist and the REAL racism which is terrible gets devalued in many ways. | |||
" Why do black people still call themselves black or black***** in this day and age? Aren't people people? Especially when, at best, they're half white? Is that not disrespectful to the white parent, frequently the mother. And how many, many generations must pass before African/American is no longer relevant. yrs sincerely Neanderthal Joe Because they're allowed to be proud of their heritage, as are you regardless of people saying you can be proud to be black but not white. I'm a straight, white, English man and I'm proud of it, anybody that calls me racist or sexist or homophobic because of that is wrong " I think the point he's making is if they have one white parent and one black patent how can they still class themselves as black when they equally white | |||
 | |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
| |||
"My parents still used coloured and half-caste. Drives me up the bloody wall! Their excuse is they grew up in different times which is frankly, bollocks "Exactly. We can all be better - but only if we want to be. | |||
| |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious.... I don't think any malice can be in the term 'coloured', though I think it's more Americans that use that term than Brits. Once was watching Question Time (yes exciting times eh) with a black friend of mine and one of the audience was a black woman who chided someone for using the term 'black', she said to use 'Afro-Carribean' instead. My mate looked at me and 'what the hell is wrong with being black?' I read a Spike Milligan book recently, a part of his autobiography, and he referred to a certain racial group in India as 'wogs'. In those days these terms were not derogatory, they merely identified a particular caste or ethnic group. Spike was born in India, and loved the country and its people very much, but someone reading that book today might consider him racist, and they'd be very wrong. An older chap that used to use our local pub often used the term that begins with 'n' to describe black people (never in a nasty way), and I once saw him fighting for the honour of a black guy that used to come in our pub when some (the real type of) racists were giving him abuse. It's such a touchy subject and people over-react to it in an effort to prove that they aren't racist. It becomes so bad that people have to choose what words they say not to be labelled as racist and the REAL racism which is terrible gets devalued in many ways." It's not a touchy subject at all,, never be afraid to ask, I agree with you about real racism being devalued by people who believe themselves to be politically correct, like the sexual preference conversations that often happen in the forum, people get hung up on the colour which has little to do with real racism | |||
" A further example to show contrary attitudes : Tiger Woods ( half Singaporean i believe) has always been described as "the first black golfer this", the first black golfer that" etc. Yep,,, doesn't make him racist. Yet, at an awards ceremony when his recently departed caddy, somewhat pissed, on winning his award stated "i'd like to shove this up his black arse" there was outrage, offence and claims of racism. Either black is descriptive or it isn't. " | |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X"  | |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X" But saying that 'we are all the same' suggests that we all have the same life experiences and opportunities in life. The fact is that we don't, and erasing peoples experience by trying to pretend that we are all the same culturally is damaging to the less-privileged group. | |||
"My parents still used coloured and half-caste. Drives me up the bloody wall! Their excuse is they grew up in different times which is frankly, bollocks "There was a time where such terms were common: a LONG time ago. For exceptionally old people, I just cringe. Anyone else, it is a weak excuse. | |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious...." I think it's comes from fear of the 'political correctness' police. If it was simple case of black is black and white is white and noone ever took offence then the world would be a better place, I grew up in the age when mixed race was commonly called 'half cast'. Sometimes people's vocabulary doesn't move with the times, and so many racial hate crimes Leading to near riots and vigilante upheavals, sometimes we choose 'the safe option' and refer to any none Caucasian as colored, this can generically include oriental and Indian heritages . Coloured is just a 'catch all term', Halle Berry used the term 'woman of colour' and yet she was the first black woman to win an oscar. So what can we do to be politically correct? Unfortunately we can either err on the side of safety or risk a 50/50 chance of insulting the person we are trying to describe. | |||
" Why do black people still call themselves black or black***** in this day and age? Aren't people people? Especially when, at best, they're half white? Is that not disrespectful to the white parent, frequently the mother. And how many, many generations must pass before African/American is no longer relevant. yrs sincerely Neanderthal Joe Because they're allowed to be proud of their heritage, as are you regardless of people saying you can be proud to be black but not white. I'm a straight, white, English man and I'm proud of it, anybody that calls me racist or sexist or homophobic because of that is wrong I think the point he's making is if they have one white parent and one black patent how can they still class themselves as black when they equally white " The confusion comes when your talking about skin colour,, being mixed race, equates to being Black politically. Even the term mixed race gives no credence to having a white parent,,, I have a white parent but because if my skin colour I might experience less opportunities to succeed. This is why politically I'm Black,, this isn't me saying this it's what BMI means | |||
| |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X But saying that 'we are all the same' suggests that we all have the same life experiences and opportunities in life. The fact is that we don't, and erasing peoples experience by trying to pretend that we are all the same culturally is damaging to the less-privileged group." Well said and perfectly correct,, | |||
| |||
 | |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X But saying that 'we are all the same' suggests that we all have the same life experiences and opportunities in life. The fact is that we don't, and erasing peoples experience by trying to pretend that we are all the same culturally is damaging to the less-privileged group." I think they were just implying that we all have body parts in common: brain, heart and stomach for example. Everything else is the madness we created ourselves or imposed on us by society. | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black." I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). | |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable?" I think it's a generational thing. I was brought up in the generation where 'coloured' was the correct term, as opposed to various Jim Davidson-style/ Love thy Neighbour-style epithets. Then we moved on to black, but now, being more multi-cultural, the extremes of black and white themselves exclude many people, hence we seem to be moving towards the American style 'people of colour'. Some people will miss the distinction of the word 'of' (like Benedict Cumberbatch did) but still be horrified at the thought of offending anyone. Others will look beyond the words to see the message/intent beneath. Personally, I do my best, but I know with my mouth, I will inevitably put my foot in it somewhen, and when I do, I hope I will be judged on my feelings, not just on the words that I used. (If that makes sense) Even Afro-Caribbean must lose it's relevance after a number of generations? No-one calls me a Celtish-Anglo-Saxon anymore. (Though some people have been known to call me a bit of a Celt. At least I think that's what they said  )
Mr ddc | |||
| |||
"I'm Just putting it out there from MY point of view not bothered about being called black or coloured!!!! My kids are erm mixed race.... I call them half caste and that is it . People can say what they want I can't stop that and I'll say what I want !!! I have let's say an equal amount of mates of both sides of the fence so no CHIPS on my shoulders "I think if you understood the term half castes you might realise how the term devalues who your children are, the caste system no longer exists in modern society (thank heavens) but to be half of a caste is to say your worth nothing, you're a no one,, a nothing!!! Not a nice way to describe anyone | |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious.... I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black." How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. | |||
"It may just be in the movies/TV, but why do our friends over the pond use the term "African-American" ?" Because they tend to come from African descent,, some Black people in America can trace their family back to slavery, majority of slaves were African. | |||
| |||
"I'm Just putting it out there from MY point of view not bothered about being called black or coloured!!!! My kids are erm mixed race.... I call them half caste and that is it . People can say what they want I can't stop that and I'll say what I want !!! I have let's say an equal amount of mates of both sides of the fence so no CHIPS on my shoulders
I think if you understood the term half castes you might realise how the term devalues who your children are, the caste system no longer exists in modern society (thank heavens) but to be half of a caste is to say your worth nothing, you're a no one,, a nothing!!!
Not a nice way to describe anyone "To be fair a word means what the utterer means it to mean. A word is simply a disturbance in air pressure which is measured by our ear and as such confers no inherent value. If a person is happy using a word to describe them or theirs then who are you/we to tell them that it does not mean what they mean by it? The fact that others have used it to mean something else is not relevant and it is a conceit for anyone to say that they should or should not refer to themselves in a particular way. | |||
| |||
| |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X But saying that 'we are all the same' suggests that we all have the same life experiences and opportunities in life. The fact is that we don't, and erasing peoples experience by trying to pretend that we are all the same culturally is damaging to the less-privileged group." And this is the problem, I suspect in its simplest form they meant along the lines of "cut me do I not bleed" as in we are all fundamentally the same, people, one race, human. | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy)." No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian. | |||
" The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background."  classic | |||
| |||
"It may just be in the movies/TV, but why do our friends over the pond use the term "African-American" ? Because they tend to come from African descent,, some Black people in America can trace their family back to slavery, majority of slaves were African. " As I'm sure most Americans can trace their heritage back to Europe, but they aren't refered to as European-Americans. | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian." Only now that the word "orient" is not used as a geographic descriptor often anymore. Previously "orient" was as correct to describe the area people came from as Asian. Given that Asia is about 1/3rd the land mass of the planet Asian is a pretty useless descriptor. Oriental narrowed it down somewhat to a specific part of Asia. | |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background." You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. | |||
"I'm Just putting it out there from MY point of view not bothered about being called black or coloured!!!! My kids are erm mixed race.... I call them half caste and that is it . People can say what they want I can't stop that and I'll say what I want !!! I have let's say an equal amount of mates of both sides of the fence so no CHIPS on my shoulders
I think if you understood the term half castes you might realise how the term devalues who your children are, the caste system no longer exists in modern society (thank heavens) but to be half of a caste is to say your worth nothing, you're a no one,, a nothing!!!
Not a nice way to describe anyone
To be fair a word means what the utterer means it to mean.
A word is simply a disturbance in air pressure which is measured by our ear and as such confers no inherent value. If a person is happy using a word to describe them or theirs then who are you/we to tell them that it does not mean what they mean by it?
The fact that others have used it to mean something else is not relevant and it is a conceit for anyone to say that they should or should not refer to themselves in a particular way."I think it does matter, you're right one can call themselves what ever they want,,,, but their children??? | |||
| |||
| |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian. Only now that the word "orient" is not used as a geographic descriptor often anymore. Previously "orient" was as correct to describe the area people came from as Asian. Given that Asia is about 1/3rd the land mass of the planet Asian is a pretty useless descriptor. Oriental narrowed it down somewhat to a specific part of Asia. " I believe alot of the problems grew out of when Europeans culturally appropriated 'Oriental' lifestyles and then oppressed the people who they were 'admiring'. We weren't very nice to the 'Orientals' and many have wanted to distance themselves from that relationship on both sides. In fact we still aren't very nice about their culture on websites like this, with the sexualisation of 'Oriental' women as submissive, and the assumption of 'Oriental' men being shit in bed. Time to move on. | |||
| |||
"It may just be in the movies/TV, but why do our friends over the pond use the term "African-American" ? Because they tend to come from African descent,, some Black people in America can trace their family back to slavery, majority of slaves were African. " I thought it was to differentiate them from 'native-american' people like the Sioux and so forth? | |||
" Won't someone think of the poor Columbians. Many of them are very black and yet may never have been anywhere near the USA, the Caribbean or indeed Africa. ?????? Shrugging my shoulders in bemusement " | |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X But saying that 'we are all the same' suggests that we all have the same life experiences and opportunities in life. The fact is that we don't, and erasing peoples experience by trying to pretend that we are all the same culturally is damaging to the less-privileged group." That's not what I said.... Bottom line, we are all humans, we all deserve to be treated the same regardless of colour or life experience, class, wealth or any other factor. | |||
" Won't someone think of the poor Columbians. Many of them are very black and yet may never have been anywhere near the USA, the Caribbean or indeed Africa. ?????? Shrugging my shoulders in bemusement "  | |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious...." To be honest the term confuses me. You, OP, are not black, but rather a shade of brown... Black is a very old term that isn't very accurate but remains to thus day. A lot of people seem to be adopting the phrase 'person/people of colour' but even that is cap as cream/pink (and all other regional variants) are colours also. So now I am just further confused and my head hurts... | |||
" I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy)." Once upon a time race description was oriental, Asian, Mediterranean, African, continental, aboriginal, native American and Hispanic. There is so much racial diversity, then the choices aren't as simple as white, mixed race and black, but someone is always going to be offended one way or the other. | |||
"I'm Just putting it out there from MY point of view not bothered about being called black or coloured!!!! My kids are erm mixed race.... I call them half caste and that is it . People can say what they want I can't stop that and I'll say what I want !!! I have let's say an equal amount of mates of both sides of the fence so no CHIPS on my shoulders
I think if you understood the term half castes you might realise how the term devalues who your children are, the caste system no longer exists in modern society (thank heavens) but to be half of a caste is to say your worth nothing, you're a no one,, a nothing!!!
Not a nice way to describe anyone
To be fair a word means what the utterer means it to mean.
A word is simply a disturbance in air pressure which is measured by our ear and as such confers no inherent value. If a person is happy using a word to describe them or theirs then who are you/we to tell them that it does not mean what they mean by it?
The fact that others have used it to mean something else is not relevant and it is a conceit for anyone to say that they should or should not refer to themselves in a particular way.
I think it does matter, you're right one can call themselves what ever they want,,,, but their children??? "Yes. Their children. Bloody hell. The first thing you do is give your child a name. How is a phrase or word automatically offensive without even considering the context in which it is used and by whom with what intent? It is remarkably pretentious to decide, totally removed from the situation as you and I are, what phrase or descriptor a family or parent can or should use to describe their own children. | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian. Only now that the word "orient" is not used as a geographic descriptor often anymore. Previously "orient" was as correct to describe the area people came from as Asian. Given that Asia is about 1/3rd the land mass of the planet Asian is a pretty useless descriptor. Oriental narrowed it down somewhat to a specific part of Asia. " I remain completely confused. Especially because I am really quite rubbish at guessing someone's country of origin and/or ethnicity. | |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X But saying that 'we are all the same' suggests that we all have the same life experiences and opportunities in life. The fact is that we don't, and erasing peoples experience by trying to pretend that we are all the same culturally is damaging to the less-privileged group. That's not what I said.... Bottom line, we are all humans, we all deserve to be treated the same regardless of colour or life experience, class, wealth or any other factor." But the fact is that we are not all treated the same. So it is damaging to pretend that we are. | |||
" I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). Once upon a time race description was oriental, Asian, Mediterranean, African, continental, aboriginal, native American and Hispanic. There is so much racial diversity, then the choices aren't as simple as white, mixed race and black, but someone is always going to be offended one way or the other. " Oh, bollocks. Then I am never going to get it right and will just have to avoid the whole thing, which is pretty much where I had got to anyway. | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian. Only now that the word "orient" is not used as a geographic descriptor often anymore. Previously "orient" was as correct to describe the area people came from as Asian. Given that Asia is about 1/3rd the land mass of the planet Asian is a pretty useless descriptor. Oriental narrowed it down somewhat to a specific part of Asia. " The Orient is everything east of the Balkans and over to the Pacific. If you want to refer to people from there as Oriental, then you should refer to people west of the Balkans to the Atlantic as Occidental | |||
 | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian. Only now that the word "orient" is not used as a geographic descriptor often anymore. Previously "orient" was as correct to describe the area people came from as Asian. Given that Asia is about 1/3rd the land mass of the planet Asian is a pretty useless descriptor. Oriental narrowed it down somewhat to a specific part of Asia. I believe alot of the problems grew out of when Europeans culturally appropriated 'Oriental' lifestyles and then oppressed the people who they were 'admiring'. We weren't very nice to the 'Orientals' and many have wanted to distance themselves from that relationship on both sides. In fact we still aren't very nice about their culture on websites like this, with the sexualisation of 'Oriental' women as submissive, and the assumption of 'Oriental' men being shit in bed. Time to move on." By your rule only. I know a number of Chinese people who refer to themselves as oriental. Let's get to the basic premise here. A word is only damaging if you mean it to be. If you use a descriptor in good faith and you do not mean to subjugate or marginalise the person on the basis of thaT descriptor then it is not offensive per se. However if the recipient of that descriptor, through experience or otherwise has just cause to fIndia that a particular descriptor either offends them or is in another way insensitive then you should be prepared to take that on board with due redress if you have been negligent. By this point in a discussion you probably do not need to use generic descriptors as you probably know their name. If as you alluded to, you are writing in an academic or other fashion, then you should be calling a place by it'a current name unless you are speaking in a historical context. Therefore to describe a mass of people by their local geographic origin alone you should use the name for that area as it is relative to the time you are referring. | |||
| |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian. Only now that the word "orient" is not used as a geographic descriptor often anymore. Previously "orient" was as correct to describe the area people came from as Asian. Given that Asia is about 1/3rd the land mass of the planet Asian is a pretty useless descriptor. Oriental narrowed it down somewhat to a specific part of Asia. I believe alot of the problems grew out of when Europeans culturally appropriated 'Oriental' lifestyles and then oppressed the people who they were 'admiring'. We weren't very nice to the 'Orientals' and many have wanted to distance themselves from that relationship on both sides. In fact we still aren't very nice about their culture on websites like this, with the sexualisation of 'Oriental' women as submissive, and the assumption of 'Oriental' men being shit in bed. Time to move on. By your rule only. I know a number of Chinese people who refer to themselves as oriental. Let's get to the basic premise here. A word is only damaging if you mean it to be. If you use a descriptor in good faith and you do not mean to subjugate or marginalise the person on the basis of thaT descriptor then it is not offensive per se. However if the recipient of that descriptor, through experience or otherwise has just cause to fIndia that a particular descriptor either offends them or is in another way insensitive then you should be prepared to take that on board with due redress if you have been negligent. By this point in a discussion you probably do not need to use generic descriptors as you probably know their name. If as you alluded to, you are writing in an academic or other fashion, then you should be calling a place by it'a current name unless you are speaking in a historical context. Therefore to describe a mass of people by their local geographic origin alone you should use the name for that area as it is relative to the time you are referring." Apologies for the typos. I have a new phone and it has a mind of it's own regarding autocorrect. | |||
 ) | |||
| |||
" I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). Once upon a time race description was oriental, Asian, Mediterranean, African, continental, aboriginal, native American and Hispanic. There is so much racial diversity, then the choices aren't as simple as white, mixed race and black, but someone is always going to be offended one way or the other. Oh, bollocks. Then I am never going to get it right and will just have to avoid the whole thing, which is pretty much where I had got to anyway." Stop trying to be right. Concentrate on just being nice and treating people with respect. Then occasionally you may have to apologise when you say something that offends a specific person for a specific reason, but that itself can be a massive build of trust and the genesis of a good relationship if handled properly. | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black. I genuinely need a list of specific acceptable terms as I am aware that my lack of knowledge might cause offence. I have, for example, seen differing views on the use of the term "oriental." (Please, no offence intended!) On a personal note, could you include a term for a British person with native American indian blood? (Apart from sexy). No offense taken, but things are Oriental, like a rug, or a vase, People are Asian. Only now that the word "orient" is not used as a geographic descriptor often anymore. Previously "orient" was as correct to describe the area people came from as Asian. Given that Asia is about 1/3rd the land mass of the planet Asian is a pretty useless descriptor. Oriental narrowed it down somewhat to a specific part of Asia. The Orient is everything east of the Balkans and over to the Pacific. If you want to refer to people from there as Oriental, then you should refer to people west of the Balkans to the Atlantic as Occidental " o·ri·en·tal (ôr'e-en'tl) adj. 1. often Oriental Of or relating to the countries of the Orient or their peoples or cultures; eastern. 2. Oriental Biology : Of or designating the biogeographic region that includes South Asia south of the Himalaya Mountains and Southeast Asia from southern China to Borneo. Oriental n. 1. An Asian, especially a South Asian, Southeast Asian, or East Asian. FTFY | |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious.... To be honest the term confuses me. You, OP, are not black, but rather a shade of brown... Black is a very old term that isn't very accurate but remains to thus day. A lot of people seem to be adopting the phrase 'person/people of colour' but even that is cap as cream/pink (and all other regional variants) are colours also. So now I am just further confused and my head hurts..." Referring back to Halle Berry she is definitely mixed race and not black, where as Frank Bruno is considerably darker skinned where he can be termed black. Both of these these people are absolute stars in there own right it would be a shame to pigeon hole these people by color So what can we do to differentiate? It's not like we can carry around a Dulux style colour chart. We tend to be generic for fear of offending. | |||
| |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious.... To be honest the term confuses me. You, OP, are not black, but rather a shade of brown... Black is a very old term that isn't very accurate but remains to thus day. A lot of people seem to be adopting the phrase 'person/people of colour' but even that is cap as cream/pink (and all other regional variants) are colours also. So now I am just further confused and my head hurts... Referring back to Halle Berry she is definitely mixed race and not black, where as Frank Bruno is considerably darker skinned where he can be termed black. Both of these these people are absolute stars in there own right it would be a shame to pigeon hole these people by color So what can we do to differentiate? It's not like we can carry around a Dulux style colour chart. We tend to be generic for fear of offending." We are almost all mixed race even if we are in one obvious colour bracket. I (Andy) have pale white skin but have mixed race heritage. Scottish and German in the past 100 years but before that who knows what races combined to make my ancestors. Skin colour is not an indicator of race alone. It needs a huge number of other factors to understand. No one on earth is a pure bred race. That sorta shit went out with the Nazis. | |||
" Stop trying to be right. Concentrate on just being nice and treating people with respect. Then occasionally you may have to apologise when you say something that offends a specific person for a specific reason, but that itself can be a massive build of trust and the genesis of a good relationship if handled properly. " Stop trying to be right? Really? If I had no respect for people, that might be good advice but I am afraid that I have always tried to be right. I have no wish whatsoever to cause any offence. | |||
| |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious.... To be honest the term confuses me. You, OP, are not black, but rather a shade of brown... Black is a very old term that isn't very accurate but remains to thus day. A lot of people seem to be adopting the phrase 'person/people of colour' but even that is cap as cream/pink (and all other regional variants) are colours also. So now I am just further confused and my head hurts... Referring back to Halle Berry she is definitely mixed race and not black, where as Frank Bruno is considerably darker skinned where he can be termed black. Both of these these people are absolute stars in there own right it would be a shame to pigeon hole these people by color So what can we do to differentiate? It's not like we can carry around a Dulux style colour chart. We tend to be generic for fear of offending. We are almost all mixed race even if we are in one obvious colour bracket. I (Andy) have pale white skin but have mixed race heritage. Scottish and German in the past 100 years but before that who knows what races combined to make my ancestors. Skin colour is not an indicator of race alone. It needs a huge number of other factors to understand. No one on earth is a pure bred race. That sorta shit went out with the Nazis." | |||
" Stop trying to be right. Concentrate on just being nice and treating people with respect. Then occasionally you may have to apologise when you say something that offends a specific person for a specific reason, but that itself can be a massive build of trust and the genesis of a good relationship if handled properly. Stop trying to be right? Really? If I had no respect for people, that might be good advice but I am afraid that I have always tried to be right. I have no wish whatsoever to cause any offence." You totally missed the point of my post. The obsession with rules and using the correct phrase and thus "being right" in that context dooms us to failure because fashions and "acceptable" phrases change at a moment's twitter campaign. However adhering to the principle of treating people with respect and kindness means that even on the off chance you do say something to someone they dont like, if you meant it with respect and care you can have the fortitude to say so and enquire as to how to redress the situation. However to assume that all people of one skin colour want to be described in the same way is like saying all women want to be called skinny or all men want to be called muscular. It is totally short sighted and pigeon holes people in a stupid clumsy and thoughtless way. "Being right" in this context means adhering rigidly to the uttering of the most fashionable phrase at any given time and is both moronic and doomed to fail as fashion changes. We need to stick to principles and not rigid rules. If we use our own brains and do not outsource our thinking to the "Rules" then we stand a much better chance of actually treating people with kindness and respect. | |||
"Drinking in La, just because your Chinese friends say Oriental, doesn't mean that it is the correct word to use. If they are Chinese then I am assuming they are non-native speakers of English. As I am assuming a lot of the people mentioned in this thread who are struggling with the correct terms are native speakers, we should not really expect non-native speakers to use the correct words 100% of the time." Good heavens, there is no "correct " word. Is this such a hard concept to grasp. To assume that 2 billion people should all rejoice in the same description is ridiculous. And who are you to patronise someone and tell them that their English is insufficient and they are offending themselves? Also I spoke about these people in the plural. Some are 2nd and 3rd generation expats who have lived in the UK all their lives. Stop being offended on their behalf. | |||
if you are not interested in getting that personal Oi You often works too | |||
"I usually find it easiest to ask for a name, Steve is much easier to say than coloured gentleman of North West Asian origins
if you are not interested in getting that personal Oi You often works too " | |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people." it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, | |||
"Drinking in La, just because your Chinese friends say Oriental, doesn't mean that it is the correct word to use. If they are Chinese then I am assuming they are non-native speakers of English. As I am assuming a lot of the people mentioned in this thread who are struggling with the correct terms are native speakers, we should not really expect non-native speakers to use the correct words 100% of the time. Good heavens, there is no "correct " word. Is this such a hard concept to grasp. To assume that 2 billion people should all rejoice in the same description is ridiculous. And who are you to patronise someone and tell them that their English is insufficient and they are offending themselves? Also I spoke about these people in the plural. Some are 2nd and 3rd generation expats who have lived in the UK all their lives. Stop being offended on their behalf." | |||
"Drinking in La, just because your Chinese friends say Oriental, doesn't mean that it is the correct word to use. If they are Chinese then I am assuming they are non-native speakers of English. As I am assuming a lot of the people mentioned in this thread who are struggling with the correct terms are native speakers, we should not really expect non-native speakers to use the correct words 100% of the time. Good heavens, there is no "correct " word. Is this such a hard concept to grasp. To assume that 2 billion people should all rejoice in the same description is ridiculous. And who are you to patronise someone and tell them that their English is insufficient and they are offending themselves? Also I spoke about these people in the plural. Some are 2nd and 3rd generation expats who have lived in the UK all their lives. Stop being offended on their behalf." You are the one who refered to them as Chinese, I personally would refer to 2nd and 3rd generation Expats as British. I'm not offended on anyones behalf. You go ahead and call people what you want, it completely goes against the grain of the thread, but you do what you like. | |||
"Drinking in La, just because your Chinese friends say Oriental, doesn't mean that it is the correct word to use. If they are Chinese then I am assuming they are non-native speakers of English. As I am assuming a lot of the people mentioned in this thread who are struggling with the correct terms are native speakers, we should not really expect non-native speakers to use the correct words 100% of the time. Good heavens, there is no "correct " word. Is this such a hard concept to grasp. To assume that 2 billion people should all rejoice in the same description is ridiculous. And who are you to patronise someone and tell them that their English is insufficient and they are offending themselves? Also I spoke about these people in the plural. Some are 2nd and 3rd generation expats who have lived in the UK all their lives. Stop being offended on their behalf. You are the one who refered to them as Chinese, I personally would refer to 2nd and 3rd generation Expats as British. I'm not offended on anyones behalf. You go ahead and call people what you want, it completely goes against the grain of the thread, but you do what you like." They have Chinese passports and consider themselves as Chinese. That is good enough for me. However given that language is not machine code, they refer to themselves with myriad terms. Some no doubt they should be stopped as they are by the measure of some of the posts on here, they are offending themselves and they are not "correct" in how they refer to their own being. I am not even sure how that works. | |||
" Stop trying to be right. Concentrate on just being nice and treating people with respect. Then occasionally you may have to apologise when you say something that offends a specific person for a specific reason, but that itself can be a massive build of trust and the genesis of a good relationship if handled properly. Stop trying to be right? Really? If I had no respect for people, that might be good advice but I am afraid that I have always tried to be right. I have no wish whatsoever to cause any offence. You totally missed the point of my post. The obsession with rules and using the correct phrase and thus "being right" in that context dooms us to failure because fashions and "acceptable" phrases change at a moment's twitter campaign. However adhering to the principle of treating people with respect and kindness means that even on the off chance you do say something to someone they dont like, if you meant it with respect and care you can have the fortitude to say so and enquire as to how to redress the situation. However to assume that all people of one skin colour want to be described in the same way is like saying all women want to be called skinny or all men want to be called muscular. It is totally short sighted and pigeon holes people in a stupid clumsy and thoughtless way. "Being right" in this context means adhering rigidly to the uttering of the most fashionable phrase at any given time and is both moronic and doomed to fail as fashion changes. We need to stick to principles and not rigid rules. If we use our own brains and do not outsource our thinking to the "Rules" then we stand a much better chance of actually treating people with kindness and respect." I am quite able to do that and did not by any means miss the point you made. We do, however, have to negotiate a minefield of a political world. I have seen major public figures derided on social media for using "antiquated" terms. It seems my conclusion from the posts here that there is no safe way to refer to ethnicity. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. | |||
 you can choose from several emoticons.
Two of which are done in the same style and are used together.
One is a devils face whos eyes are looking to the right, the other is a black guy whos eyes are looking left.
So it looks like the black guy and the devil are looking at each other and smiling
There's no matching white guy emoticon...   | |||
" Oh, bollocks. Then I am never going to get it right and will just have to avoid the whole thing, which is pretty much where I had got to anyway. Stop trying to be right. Concentrate on just being nice and treating people with respect. Then occasionally you may have to apologise when you say something that offends a specific person for a specific reason, but that itself can be a massive build of trust and the genesis of a good relationship if handled properly. " Just to show my age a little bit more, in the 60's 70's there was only black, white and half cast. In my school days when the half cast generation started to reach sexual maturity, then started a generation of quarter cast children, one half cast and a one white parent would make what was termed at the time as a 'coffee colored kid', whereas a thee quarter cast child was still black. This generation some are trying to categorise racial diversity in degrees of 1/32 and 1/64 cast. We really shouldn't be categorising anybody by skin tone, is he a nice person or a complete arse? Skin colour makes no difference to their personality. | |||
" Stop trying to be right. Concentrate on just being nice and treating people with respect. Then occasionally you may have to apologise when you say something that offends a specific person for a specific reason, but that itself can be a massive build of trust and the genesis of a good relationship if handled properly. Stop trying to be right? Really? If I had no respect for people, that might be good advice but I am afraid that I have always tried to be right. I have no wish whatsoever to cause any offence. You totally missed the point of my post. The obsession with rules and using the correct phrase and thus "being right" in that context dooms us to failure because fashions and "acceptable" phrases change at a moment's twitter campaign. However adhering to the principle of treating people with respect and kindness means that even on the off chance you do say something to someone they dont like, if you meant it with respect and care you can have the fortitude to say so and enquire as to how to redress the situation. However to assume that all people of one skin colour want to be described in the same way is like saying all women want to be called skinny or all men want to be called muscular. It is totally short sighted and pigeon holes people in a stupid clumsy and thoughtless way. "Being right" in this context means adhering rigidly to the uttering of the most fashionable phrase at any given time and is both moronic and doomed to fail as fashion changes. We need to stick to principles and not rigid rules. If we use our own brains and do not outsource our thinking to the "Rules" then we stand a much better chance of actually treating people with kindness and respect. I am quite able to do that and did not by any means miss the point you made. We do, however, have to negotiate a minefield of a political world. I have seen major public figures derided on social media for using "antiquated" terms. It seems my conclusion from the posts here that there is no safe way to refer to ethnicity. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. " Correct so adhere to the good principles and then you are in a position to defend yourself if someone needs to take offence to validate their existence. Also the point you raise about the political landscape is a good one. The political landscape is currently a poisonous one and many people who are called out for perceived slights are usually done so not because they offended anyone who was not looking to be offended but because other people are trying to facilitate that person's downfall for their own gain. Therefore it is incumbent on us to adhere to the good principle even more as the public because to get sucked into the political correctness fashion parade of self aggrandising fuckwits who are only trying to feather their own political nest serves only to make these fuckwits more powerful and more successful. And to make the landscape harder for you and I to navigate. | |||
| |||
In fact, algorithm wasn't a bad guess, at all. | |||
| |||
| |||
" Oh, bollocks. Then I am never going to get it right and will just have to avoid the whole thing, which is pretty much where I had got to anyway. Stop trying to be right. Concentrate on just being nice and treating people with respect. Then occasionally you may have to apologise when you say something that offends a specific person for a specific reason, but that itself can be a massive build of trust and the genesis of a good relationship if handled properly. Just to show my age a little bit more, in the 60's 70's there was only black, white and half cast. In my school days when the half cast generation started to reach sexual maturity, then started a generation of quarter cast children, one half cast and a one white parent would make what was termed at the time as a 'coffee colored kid', whereas a thee quarter cast child was still black. This generation some are trying to categorise racial diversity in degrees of 1/32 and 1/64 cast. We really shouldn't be categorising anybody by skin tone, is he a nice person or a complete arse? Skin colour makes no difference to their personality." Even older, here. Same issues. The problem only occurs when trying to describe ethnicity. Skin colour of course does not define personality but there are situations where it is not possible to avoid some categorisation. | |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, " Considering that academics refer to themselves as Black, and their work as Black Theory, I'm ok taking their lead and following their examples. I look to the experts in the field when using terms that are outside of my sphere of experience and asses their contributions on their own lived experience. In the case of Black Theory I have followed the lead of some prominent Black Theorists who identify themselves as Black. I'm not saying they're right, but they lay down pretty convincing arguments. They certainly can't speak for everyone who has a non-caucasian skin colour, but it certainly helps to work out what words you want to use to refer to people (I also study feminist and queer theories) so that you can get on with the interesting parts of the debates rather than the semantics. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
  | |||
| |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, Considering that academics refer to themselves as Black, and their work as Black Theory, I'm ok taking their lead and following their examples. I look to the experts in the field when using terms that are outside of my sphere of experience and asses their contributions on their own lived experience. In the case of Black Theory I have followed the lead of some prominent Black Theorists who identify themselves as Black. I'm not saying they're right, but they lay down pretty convincing arguments. They certainly can't speak for everyone who has a non-caucasian skin colour, but it certainly helps to work out what words you want to use to refer to people (I also study feminist and queer theories) so that you can get on with the interesting parts of the debates rather than the semantics." Black feminist academics eh? Good role models eh? Like Mireille Miller Young, a professor (sic) of Feminist Studies, UoC-Santa Barbara? A POC by the way. Who thought it wonderful to attack two white women lawfully and peacefully using the University's own and specifically provided "free-speech zone" to make their point. Apparently, this "triggered" the professor (sic) and violated her "right to go to work and not be in harm". The Feminist Wire leapt to her defence. Makes a good read for anyone who wishes to : a) have a bloody good laugh, and despair a little, and b) leap on the outraged "how dare two white women cause a POC to do that" brigade. Make no wonder mental health issues are on the rise, Feminist Wire should come with a Health Warning on its cover/front page. | |||
"I was born in the 60's Life was good "better" in the 60's and there were no concerns then of how you classify someone still remember and love the 70's too and "love thy neighbour" was so funny to watch guess the people of today thinking they are all so politically correct put a stop to the good ol days" Yes it was wonderful back then. When you could be arrested for gay sex, and when black people were prevented from doing certain things. Politically Correct - a term for things you personally find ridiculous but that other people seem to agree with? | |||
"Growing up I was told saying a "black person" was offensive and to use "coloured person" instead. I had always thought that was odd as I'd never seen a person of 'colour' (green, blue etc) " Exactly the same in my younger days!,then it got changed overnight and you were in the wrong all of a sudden for saying Coloured. | |||
"I'm Just putting it out there from MY point of view not bothered about being called black or coloured!!!! My kids are erm mixed race.... I call them half caste and that is it . People can say what they want I can't stop that and I'll say what I want !!! I have let's say an equal amount of mates of both sides of the fence so no CHIPS on my shoulders
I think if you understood the term half castes you might realise how the term devalues who your children are, the caste system no longer exists in modern society (thank heavens) but to be half of a caste is to say your worth nothing, you're a no one,, a nothing!!!
Not a nice way to describe anyone "Again I'm not bothered what's right or wrong I can't control that !!! That is how it was when I young and it has stuck if you or anyone else doesn't like it ....... My children are very well rounded and whilst they don't suffer fools gladly ! I have built in to them a sticks and stones shield and I know it works because we often take the piss out of each other weekly! So again they know there worth in this world and have no chips or race cards up the sleeve to pull out ........ We just roll with the punches and make best of whatever is thrown at us . And in closing a big apology if I have upset anyone and my children were not harmed in the making of their lives lol | |||
"Growing up I was told saying a "black person" was offensive and to use "coloured person" instead. I had always thought that was odd as I'd never seen a person of 'colour' (green, blue etc) Exactly the same in my younger days!,then it got changed overnight and you were in the wrong all of a sudden for saying Coloured." But I get messages on here from 'black' men, asking 'do you meet coloured guys at all ?' People I work with, correct us if refer to them as black, they prefer to be called coloured, as they feel it reflects their white parent | |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, Considering that academics refer to themselves as Black, and their work as Black Theory, I'm ok taking their lead and following their examples. I look to the experts in the field when using terms that are outside of my sphere of experience and asses their contributions on their own lived experience. In the case of Black Theory I have followed the lead of some prominent Black Theorists who identify themselves as Black. I'm not saying they're right, but they lay down pretty convincing arguments. They certainly can't speak for everyone who has a non-caucasian skin colour, but it certainly helps to work out what words you want to use to refer to people (I also study feminist and queer theories) so that you can get on with the interesting parts of the debates rather than the semantics." could you give an example of an academic that refers to himself as black or white please, i would love to study the academic to know if he is a brainwashed soul or a person of sound mind free from the subconcious hierarchy programming. Lets assume the same academics instruct you to stick your fingers in a flame will u follow suit or challenge their motives. Its easy for society to lean towards what is perceived as the norm but what makes a sound mind unique is its ability to question and challenge every form of information its been fed and redefine life from its own perspective . The academics you refering to probably need to go spec savers as they might either be colour blind or simply have no concept of what a black or white colour really is. | |||
| |||
| |||
"That's where I start to struggle, with the concept of Black politics. The idea that a high-court barrister, a kid from a deprived neighbourhood of London, and a Somali asylum seeker are all somehow identical and share a common brotherhood. There are areas of deprivation where we need intervention to help improve the life-chances of the next generation, but it matters not whether they are from Tower Hamlets, Easington, or the Welsh valleys. My politics is not white, but a mix of blue and yellowy-orange, (which doesn't make green, since they're all reds, and worse than Gordon Brown) (hopefully Sexybum won't spot that, or he'll go purple and kick me black and blue) Apologies to any colours I missed." Of course they are not identical. Wasn't it the black opportunity-denied High Court Barrister Tory Lord who was so impoverished that he was sent to prison for stealing from the public by way of fiddled expense claims? | |||
"That's where I start to struggle, with the concept of Black politics. The idea that a high-court barrister, a kid from a deprived neighbourhood of London, and a Somali asylum seeker are all somehow identical and share a common brotherhood. There are areas of deprivation where we need intervention to help improve the life-chances of the next generation, but it matters not whether they are from Tower Hamlets, Easington, or the Welsh valleys. My politics is not white, but a mix of blue and yellowy-orange, (which doesn't make green, since they're all reds, and worse than Gordon Brown) (hopefully Sexybum won't spot that, or he'll go purple and kick me black and blue) Apologies to any colours I missed." . Ure name is going in zee book | |||
" Why do black people still call themselves black or black***** in this day and age? Aren't people people? Especially when, at best, they're half white? Is that not disrespectful to the white parent, frequently the mother. And how many, many generations must pass before African/American is no longer relevant. yrs sincerely Neanderthal Joe Because they're allowed to be proud of their heritage, as are you regardless of people saying you can be proud to be black but not white. I'm a straight, white, English man and I'm proud of it, anybody that calls me racist or sexist or homophobic because of that is wrong I think the point he's making is if they have one white parent and one black patent how can they still class themselves as black when they equally white " As the white mother, I can say categorically it is not disrespectful. I have asked my son this on more than a few occasions, if he feels more black or white? Neither quite, he says, he feels different, but when we came to England, having been in a community with very few black people, he felt so much more at home and was drawn more towards the black community. I told him he has basically grown up in a white family, run by me until I got with my OH, who is black and also has mixed race children with a white mother. There are many, many mixed raced children, indeed I would go so far as to say they are the norm in some areas, I think they can feel more 'other' and certainly need some reassurance that they belong somewhere .... something I do think about for the sake of our children. | |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, Considering that academics refer to themselves as Black, and their work as Black Theory, I'm ok taking their lead and following their examples. I look to the experts in the field when using terms that are outside of my sphere of experience and asses their contributions on their own lived experience. In the case of Black Theory I have followed the lead of some prominent Black Theorists who identify themselves as Black. I'm not saying they're right, but they lay down pretty convincing arguments. They certainly can't speak for everyone who has a non-caucasian skin colour, but it certainly helps to work out what words you want to use to refer to people (I also study feminist and queer theories) so that you can get on with the interesting parts of the debates rather than the semantics. Black feminist academics eh? Good role models eh? Like Mireille Miller Young, a professor (sic) of Feminist Studies, UoC-Santa Barbara? A POC by the way. Who thought it wonderful to attack two white women lawfully and peacefully using the University's own and specifically provided "free-speech zone" to make their point. Apparently, this "triggered" the professor (sic) and violated her "right to go to work and not be in harm". The Feminist Wire leapt to her defence. Makes a good read for anyone who wishes to : a) have a bloody good laugh, and despair a little, and b) leap on the outraged "how dare two white women cause a POC to do that" brigade. Make no wonder mental health issues are on the rise, Feminist Wire should come with a Health Warning on its cover/front page. "Further evidence if any more were needed that pricks are pricks irrespective of their ethnicity or political leaning. For too long those who are on the side of a minority or oppressed group's desire for equality are able to hide their private bigotry and agendas conceived therein behind the veneer of many a respectable cause. That is why so many women do not identify with feminism for example. It is a tarnished brand which has been ruined by extremists. Despite what many idiots in this country think, ethnic minorities can have racists in their midst. Pricks are pricks. Let's not damage good causes like universal equality and human rights because of some intolerant bigots. | |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, Considering that academics refer to themselves as Black, and their work as Black Theory, I'm ok taking their lead and following their examples. I look to the experts in the field when using terms that are outside of my sphere of experience and asses their contributions on their own lived experience. In the case of Black Theory I have followed the lead of some prominent Black Theorists who identify themselves as Black. I'm not saying they're right, but they lay down pretty convincing arguments. They certainly can't speak for everyone who has a non-caucasian skin colour, but it certainly helps to work out what words you want to use to refer to people (I also study feminist and queer theories) so that you can get on with the interesting parts of the debates rather than the semantics. Black feminist academics eh? Good role models eh? Like Mireille Miller Young, a professor (sic) of Feminist Studies, UoC-Santa Barbara? A POC by the way. Who thought it wonderful to attack two white women lawfully and peacefully using the University's own and specifically provided "free-speech zone" to make their point. Apparently, this "triggered" the professor (sic) and violated her "right to go to work and not be in harm". The Feminist Wire leapt to her defence. Makes a good read for anyone who wishes to : a) have a bloody good laugh, and despair a little, and b) leap on the outraged "how dare two white women cause a POC to do that" brigade. Make no wonder mental health issues are on the rise, Feminist Wire should come with a Health Warning on its cover/front page.
Further evidence if any more were needed that pricks are pricks irrespective of their ethnicity or political leaning.
For too long those who are on the side of a minority or oppressed group's desire for equality are able to hide their private bigotry and agendas conceived therein behind the veneer of many a respectable cause.
That is why so many women do not identify with feminism for example. It is a tarnished brand which has been ruined by extremists. Despite what many idiots in this country think, ethnic minorities can have racists in their midst.
Pricks are pricks. Let's not damage good causes like universal equality and human rights because of some intolerant bigots."Absolutely correct | |||
| |||
| |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, Considering that academics refer to themselves as Black, and their work as Black Theory, I'm ok taking their lead and following their examples. I look to the experts in the field when using terms that are outside of my sphere of experience and asses their contributions on their own lived experience. In the case of Black Theory I have followed the lead of some prominent Black Theorists who identify themselves as Black. I'm not saying they're right, but they lay down pretty convincing arguments. They certainly can't speak for everyone who has a non-caucasian skin colour, but it certainly helps to work out what words you want to use to refer to people (I also study feminist and queer theories) so that you can get on with the interesting parts of the debates rather than the semantics. Black feminist academics eh? Good role models eh? Like Mireille Miller Young, a professor (sic) of Feminist Studies, UoC-Santa Barbara? A POC by the way. Who thought it wonderful to attack two white women lawfully and peacefully using the University's own and specifically provided "free-speech zone" to make their point. Apparently, this "triggered" the professor (sic) and violated her "right to go to work and not be in harm". The Feminist Wire leapt to her defence. Makes a good read for anyone who wishes to : a) have a bloody good laugh, and despair a little, and b) leap on the outraged "how dare two white women cause a POC to do that" brigade. Make no wonder mental health issues are on the rise, Feminist Wire should come with a Health Warning on its cover/front page.
Further evidence if any more were needed that pricks are pricks irrespective of their ethnicity or political leaning.
For too long those who are on the side of a minority or oppressed group's desire for equality are able to hide their private bigotry and agendas conceived therein behind the veneer of many a respectable cause.
That is why so many women do not identify with feminism for example. It is a tarnished brand which has been ruined by extremists. Despite what many idiots in this country think, ethnic minorities can have racists in their midst.
Pricks are pricks. Let's not damage good causes like universal equality and human rights because of some intolerant bigots."Trust me, the racism, hatred and bigotry expressed (against the white women, one as young as 16 i believe) was not hidden at all, quite explicit. And did the professor lose her job? Not that i know of. | |||
| |||
"I used to work for a big American company, and they always referred to "black" people as "people of colour". Bearing in mind, this company was ultra-PC, daren't offend anyone. But it always struck me as very odd. I'm a "person of colour" - I'm pale pink, or bright red if I spend too long in the sun. Personally I don't find the term "black" in any way offensive. It's a description of their skin colour, nothing more. It's just that certain people seem to equate this with the old slavery regime. Another example : my mum is a physiotherapist, and specialises in children with physical disabilities. When she was first practising, the term "Spastic" meant "someone with cerebral palsy". But you can't say that word now. Indeed, the charity that was called "The Spastics Society" is now called "Scope". Why ? Times change, but most well-meaning people refer to "groups" of people as they were taught to refer to them, without meaning any malice." Give it a couple of years and "person of colour" will be offensive to those who love being offended, or to those who love being offended on behalf of someone else. Can somebody please let me know when the next meeting to decide on ethnic terminology is to be held? Thanks. | |||
"Trust me, the racism, hatred and bigotry expressed (against the white women, one as young as 16 i believe) was not hidden at all, quite explicit. And did the professor lose her job? Not that i know of. " Apologies for not trusting you, but am I watching the wrong video or something? I saw nothing racist, nor feminist, nor anti-feminist, nor bigoted. I saw two spoilt young women, trespassing on university property, refusing to leave, and harassing a professor (why sic? Is she not a professor?) by preventing her from leaving in a lift. Yes, one was white and the other black, but I don't see the relevance here, and surely crying racism where none exists is wrong even when white people do it? Or did I get the wrong video? | |||
"Trust me, the racism, hatred and bigotry expressed (against the white women, one as young as 16 i believe) was not hidden at all, quite explicit. And did the professor lose her job? Not that i know of. Apologies for not trusting you, but am I watching the wrong video or something? I saw nothing racist, nor feminist, nor anti-feminist, nor bigoted. I saw two spoilt young women, trespassing on university property, refusing to leave, and harassing a professor (why sic? Is she not a professor?) by preventing her from leaving in a lift. Yes, one was white and the other black, but I don't see the relevance here, and surely crying racism where none exists is wrong even when white people do it? Or did I get the wrong video? " re professor (sic), that's how the US news article described her. Quite why it didn't capitalise it (twice) i don't know as I myself assume she is a Professor given her employment. The racism, hatred and bigotry follows the event, made by her supporters in "Femine Wired" and social media posts thereafter. ps no apologies ever required but thanks. | |||
| |||
" re professor (sic), that's how the US news article described her. Quite why it didn't capitalise it (twice) i don't know as I myself assume she is a Professor given her employment. The racism, hatred and bigotry follows the event, made by her supporters in "Femine Wired" and social media posts thereafter. ps no apologies ever required but thanks. " Ahh, I think in America, the term 'professor' simply relates to any teacher in a college or university, so wouldn't necessarily be capitalised. From what I saw in the video, her 'supporters' were simply her students, so the whole thing comes across as a bit of a childish spat. I'll have a look for the articles, but it still looks like someone deliberately making a mountain out of a molehill. As always, it's interesting in any filmed altercation how the juicy bit at the start always gets edited out, leaving us to substitute our own preconceived ideas. (Which, natch, includes me) | |||
| |||
| |||
"Personal opinion only... Black, white, mixed race or any othe description the pc brigade would like to give people makes no difference. People will cause offence by using the wrong term do describe others and generally no harm is intentionally intended. If you are describing a black person and refer to him as african american he may be offended especially if he is jamaican. So to not offend you would need to find out his heritage and then say he is jamaican american... think it may be easier just to ask his name. Truth is BE offended and outraged if peopleuse terms like wog, coon and other such vile terms. Black/ coloured is not in any way deliberately offensive but as always education is key. Our children will learn their values from us and their children from them. Hopefully in another hundred years our great grandkids will be amazed that we were so racist and I don't only mean white people as there is racism from every culture in this country and that will not change if we as a country don't and sometimes people trying to be too pc only hinders the change. Treat others as you, yourself would like to be treated. " Interesting to categorise ourselves on official forms. My son is technically African American and British mixed but such a category does not exist on British forms, he is not black African and white British mixed, nor is he afro Caribbean and white British mixed, so I always end up putting other for all of us .... but as I stated on an earlier post, more and more mixed children who cannot be squeezed into square boxes | |||
" I'll have a look for the articles, " Could only find two "Why you should never engage with an abortion protester" in Salon and "Why I Am In Solidarity with Mireille Miller-Young" in The Feminist Wire. I'd still side with the professor. It seems she was even forced to plead guilty to theft in order to keep her job.(When they refused to remove their posters and leave, she removed the signs herself) Oh, and the group the 'innocent little white girls' belonged to had apparently just bombed an abortion clinic. Nice. | |||
"Politically Correct - a term for things you personally find ridiculous but that other people seem to agree with?" Apparently some people have felt the need to send me hateful and bile filled messages based on this statement. In the future, please feel free to write your comments in the forums rather than sending cowardly emails. | |||
" How can black be a colour? White is more of a colour than black if we are getting literal. I would just tend to call them by their name. Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it. Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background. You are, of course, quite right. However I'm talking about when I wrote about the subject (I'm an art history student and journalist) and sometimes you do want to group people into ethnicity groups depending on their background. Black is usually a word used to describe those of various types of african heritage and sometimes it's important to use that term. For instance I wrote an essay about the Black response to the British Museum's Africa gallery last year. It's a way of conveying to people which group I'm talking about. Saying 'African' for example wouldn't be specific enough, for you can have white African heritage which is a different group of people who have been historically more privileged. But 'Black African', for example, specifies a particular group of people. it must have been a very confusing essay you put together, first off the term black african contradicts itself as africans have a dark shade of brown skin not black skin and by saying ' black africans' specify a particular group of people, puzzles me - 85% of africans have dark skin, 15% have a much more lighter skin shade except ofcourse there are red, blue or green africans that ive never heard of. The term black / white is a logically retarded term as the human skin colour cant fully exhibit these two shades of colour due to the presence of red blood cells and melanin in our bodies. Politically speaking we are all ill-defined by a colour black / white, but logically speaking africans are not of the black colour spectrum neither are europeans of the white colour spectrum. The difference in our skin tones is determined by the presence or absence of the melanin hormone and the differences in our skin tone is the beauty of the human race and deep down inside we are all the same. I was gona ask you tho, Considering that academics refer to themselves as Black, and their work as Black Theory, I'm ok taking their lead and following their examples. I look to the experts in the field when using terms that are outside of my sphere of experience and asses their contributions on their own lived experience. In the case of Black Theory I have followed the lead of some prominent Black Theorists who identify themselves as Black. I'm not saying they're right, but they lay down pretty convincing arguments. They certainly can't speak for everyone who has a non-caucasian skin colour, but it certainly helps to work out what words you want to use to refer to people (I also study feminist and queer theories) so that you can get on with the interesting parts of the debates rather than the semantics. Black feminist academics eh? Good role models eh? Like Mireille Miller Young, a professor (sic) of Feminist Studies, UoC-Santa Barbara? A POC by the way. Who thought it wonderful to attack two white women lawfully and peacefully using the University's own and specifically provided "free-speech zone" to make their point. Apparently, this "triggered" the professor (sic) and violated her "right to go to work and not be in harm". The Feminist Wire leapt to her defence. Makes a good read for anyone who wishes to : a) have a bloody good laugh, and despair a little, and b) leap on the outraged "how dare two white women cause a POC to do that" brigade. Make no wonder mental health issues are on the rise, Feminist Wire should come with a Health Warning on its cover/front page.
Further evidence if any more were needed that pricks are pricks irrespective of their ethnicity or political leaning.
For too long those who are on the side of a minority or oppressed group's desire for equality are able to hide their private bigotry and agendas conceived therein behind the veneer of many a respectable cause.
That is why so many women do not identify with feminism for example. It is a tarnished brand which has been ruined by extremists. Despite what many idiots in this country think, ethnic minorities can have racists in their midst.
Pricks are pricks. Let's not damage good causes like universal equality and human rights because of some intolerant bigots.
I would just tend to call them by their name.
Why, unless we are describing their appearance do we describe people's skin colour at all? If you were talking about anything other than a physical description what has the colour of their skin got to do with it.
Also saying all black people share a common ethnic descent is a pretty blunt instrument. There are a vast array of ethnicities amongst people with dark skin as there is amongst people with yellow, white, blue and red skin. It is a very inaccurate descriptor borne of a lack of thought given to what actually makes a person. The frequency at which light reflects off of someone's skin is by no means the most telling measure of a person's background
Trust me, the racism, hatred and bigotry expressed (against the white women, one as young as 16 i believe) was not hidden at all, quite explicit.
And did the professor lose her job? Not that i know of. "wow; that's a big read, I just skipped through it, maybe someone could read and update me with a shorter version | |||
" I use the term Persons of Colour because it's what is used as an academic standard term (and doesn't have the same 'otherness' issues as the phrase 'non-caucasian'). If I am talking specifically about people who are of black descent, then I would use the term black." Don't all people have a colour. We find the term people of colour a crass example of political correctness and insulting to everyone. We seldom comment about the colour of a person but if we have to we prefer to use whatever term they use to describe themselves. | |||
"Politically Correct - a term for things you personally find ridiculous but that other people seem to agree with? Apparently some people have felt the need to send me hateful and bile filled messages based on this statement. In the future, please feel free to write your comments in the forums rather than sending cowardly emails." im guessing its because they got a bad inpression about you based on most of your comments about the topic. How you feeling now tho | |||
"Why do some people still refer to black people as coloured people? Where does this delusional thinking stem from that make people think this is acceptable? Equally when people use terms like whites or pale people, are we not allowed to just say white people or black people. Let me add I'm not trying to start an ethnic group war. I'm just curious...." When I was a child I think the politically correct term WAS 'coloured'! I guess the problem with 'black' and 'white' is that a lot of people aren't either black or white - we're a whole plethora of shades in between! And as each generation integrates more between races/cultures as we are doing now - then in a few generations that term also will be obsolete - and we'll have to look around for a new term that doesn't offend! By then most people will be a blend of colours and cultures I'd hope/imagine - and all this race/culture hate will hopefully be long gone!! Tbh though - the word coloured isn't offensive imho unless it's said in an offensive manner! If we look for things to offend or anger us, we will always find them! Stop looking! Xxx | |||
"I used to work for a big American company, and they always referred to "black" people as "people of colour". Bearing in mind, this company was ultra-PC, daren't offend anyone. But it always struck me as very odd. I'm a "person of colour" - I'm pale pink, or bright red if I spend too long in the sun. Personally I don't find the term "black" in any way offensive. It's a description of their skin colour, nothing more. It's just that certain people seem to equate this with the old slavery regime. Another example : my mum is a physiotherapist, and specialises in children with physical disabilities. When she was first practising, the term "Spastic" meant "someone with cerebral palsy". But you can't say that word now. Indeed, the charity that was called "The Spastics Society" is now called "Scope". Why ? Times change, but most well-meaning people refer to "groups" of people as they were taught to refer to them, without meaning any malice." Exactly. My 87 yr old mother uses the term coloured, it's just what was correct when she was young. | |||
"We are all pink in the middle That's all I have to say X But saying that 'we are all the same' suggests that we all have the same life experiences and opportunities in life. The fact is that we don't, and erasing peoples experience by trying to pretend that we are all the same culturally is damaging to the less-privileged group. That's not what I said.... Bottom line, we are all humans, we all deserve to be treated the same regardless of colour or life experience, class, wealth or any other factor. But the fact is that we are not all treated the same. So it is damaging to pretend that we are." Very true, though I hope that one day we will be. | |||
"Who gives a rat's arse ? As long as your not being derogatory or racist..calling someone black..brown.. coloured ...is absolutely 100% Fine. Some People just chat shit for the sake of it." It's called discussion. No one forcing you to participate. . . | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Seeing as I grew up in Africa, I know you'll assume the worst, but the term 'coloured' is a completely acceptable term to use in that country, and refers to the Cape Coloured community which is predominantly located in the Western Cape province (think Cape Town). The Cape Coloured community actually use the term themselves to describe their origins, before anyone used the apartheid term ! Therefore I still use the term, but then realise I have to correct myself as over in England it is deemed racist or un-pc, whereas in another country it is deemed totally acceptable. Guess that begs the question; who decides what is racist and what isn't ? Are we as a Western society to dictate to others that a term that is offensive in the UK cannot be used to describe a vast population of Another country, when that population openly use the term to describe themselves ?" Wasn't it Suarez who insisted that the word he allegedly used is a bog-standard day to day word back home? | |||
" Wasn't it Suarez who insisted that the word he allegedly used is a bog-standard day to day word back home? " Who's Suarez ? | |||
| |||
" Wasn't it Suarez who insisted that the word he allegedly used is a bog-standard day to day word back home? Who's Suarez ?" Luis Suarez, the LFC footballer involved in an altercation with Man Utd's black left back. I forget his name but he was no shrinking violet himself. | |||
" Wasn't it Suarez who insisted that the word he allegedly used is a bog-standard day to day word back home? Who's Suarez ? Luis Suarez, the LFC footballer involved in an altercation with Man Utd's black left back. I forget his name but he was no shrinking violet himself. " Oh, sorry ! I'm not a football person ! | |||
| |||
"I wish they would just pick a term and stick to it, as it seems to be black is ok one month and the next coloured is the correct terminology, it's like you can't win for losing " How about we just use people's names? | |||
"I wish they would just pick a term and stick to it, as it seems to be black is ok one month and the next coloured is the correct terminology, it's like you can't win for losing How about we just use people's names?" I generally do, you'd assume otherwise because? The OP asked a question I gave an answer that shows a possible reason as to why | |||
| |||
"I recall a few years back calling a black guy a 'coloured guy' - not because I was trying to be racist, in fact the opposite. I was trying to use the correct non-offensive terminology. It was only the barrage of abuse that I got that made me realise my own ignorance as to what was and wasn't acceptable. So I don't think necessarily there's always malice involved. I'm more concerned that it's ok if a black person uses the 'N'-word but not a white person. The usual PC bullshit is that this shows black people 'owning the word' in an 'ironic way'. Bollox! It's either racist or it isn't! A bit like saying "I can't be racist as I'm black" (as if only white people can be racist). " I have a friend who is an albino. The names he calls himself makes me cringe and it would NEVER cross my mind to use them because he does: likewise with my gay friends. I said to my friend the other day "I suppose I'd better get my fat arse to the gym". The following night he asked me if I was taking my fat arse to the gym. I pulled him up about it. What I call myself is one thing, it's not an invitation for others to. If a black person wants to call themself the n word, a word I don't use, that's their choice. If a disabled person described themselves as a spastic or a gay man a poofter would you then want to use those outdated terminology to every disabled, gay person?!! | |||
"I'm Just putting it out there from MY point of view not bothered about being called black or coloured!!!! My kids are erm mixed race.... I call them half caste and that is it . People can say what they want I can't stop that and I'll say what I want !!! I have let's say an equal amount of mates of both sides of the fence so no CHIPS on my shoulders "Poor kids. My son-in-law is white, my daughter is expecting twins. I think the term now is duel heritage, it wouldn't cross my mind to devalue them as half caste. My other half is white and accuses me of not having a sense of humour because I ripped him a new one when he asked me, when we were in the garden, "where's the black man?...Ah, here he is"...picking up the spade!
| |||
"I'm Just putting it out there from MY point of view not bothered about being called black or coloured!!!! My kids are erm mixed race.... I call them half caste and that is it . People can say what they want I can't stop that and I'll say what I want !!! I have let's say an equal amount of mates of both sides of the fence so no CHIPS on my shoulders
I think if you understood the term half castes you might realise how the term devalues who your children are, the caste system no longer exists in modern society (thank heavens) but to be half of a caste is to say your worth nothing, you're a no one,, a nothing!!!
Not a nice way to describe anyone "Exactly! | |||
| |||
"I was born in the 60's Life was good "better" in the 60's and there were no concerns then of how you classify someone still remember and love the 70's too and "love thy neighbour" was so funny to watch guess the people of today thinking they are all so politically correct put a stop to the good ol days" I was born in the 60s and recall people referring to my parents as sambos, nig nogs and the like. I asked my dad why he didn't say anything to the rude people. His response, you don't insult someone in their home. My parents were hurt and confused. They were happyin Jamaica. The Tory government went cap in hand to the colonies begging for help to rebuild the motherland after the war. They came to help and faced abuse. Aah yes, happy days the 60s. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
