FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Spider Letters

Spider Letters

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

It seems the twenty or so letters written by the Prince of Wales to government ministers (of the time) will be released today.

The Palace tried to get the publication of the letters stopped. If you or I were to write to a public official the correspondence becomes a public document under the Freedom of information Act.

Legal fees incurred by the Government in trying to stop the publication are estimated to be £300k. Is this one law for the Royals and one for the great unwashed?

Lets see whats in the letters which will be heavily redacted no doubt!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *inaTitzTV/TS  over a year ago

Titz Towers, North Notts

I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. "
Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *vgloryholebs16TV/TS  over a year ago

Bristol.

Cos he's a prince.....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Cos he's a prince....."
Ah got it now.................silly (republican) me!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

Why 'spider'?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Why 'spider'? "
His hand writing looks like a spider has crawled across the page, evidently!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

They should print all the stuff about peadophile ministers...oh yeah it disappeared. Surprised the royals haven't used the same secrecy laws as the cover-ups.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ngel n tedCouple  over a year ago

maidstone


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?"

i'm sure someone will make few bob from it somewhere, why is anything done theses days

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ngel n tedCouple  over a year ago

maidstone


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?

i'm sure someone will make few bob from it somewhere, why is anything done theses days"

these, sorry, i'm not smeagol really

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?

i'm sure someone will make few bob from it somewhere, why is anything done theses days

these, sorry, i'm not smeagol really "

wish there was more smeagols on here though, that made me laugh.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?"

They are not being treated differently , they are being published.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Why are they wanting to publish the letters anyway?"
To highlight that a non elected future head of state was trying to influence government policy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?

They are not being treated differently , they are being published. "

They are now but the government wanted to suppress information that should be made available.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I doubt they will tell us anything that we didn't already know: Prince Charles is a bit of a wally, but not a totally bad sort. Quite agree but my point is why should his correspondence be treated differently to yours on mine?

They are not being treated differently , they are being published. They are now but the government wanted to suppress information that should be made available."

But they couldn't , so no one is being treated differently.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Agreed.

The issue is I believe why the future monarch is trying to influence government policy which is out side his constitutional role?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0