FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Would you say you've had a bad meet?
Jump to: Newest in thread
" Hiya, I was just curious, after reading some verifications going into great detail about how wonderful their meets are, do people ever leave bad veris? I know we can't name and shame but, what would you write in a veri if you were trying to make it clear that, for instance, the guy looked more like his father?! " If you cant say something nice......... xx | |||
" Hiya, I was just curious, after reading some verifications going into great detail about how wonderful their meets are, do people ever leave bad veris? I know we can't name and shame but, what would you write in a veri if you were trying to make it clear that, for instance, the guy looked more like his father?! " i have once on a previous profile he was useless and wouldnt leave me alone after | |||
| |||
| |||
" Hiya, I was just curious, after reading some verifications going into great detail about how wonderful their meets are, do people ever leave bad veris? I know we can't name and shame but, what would you write in a veri if you were trying to make it clear that, for instance, the guy looked more like his father?! If you cant say something nice......... xx " This made me smile lots!!!.....soooo true tho! xxx | |||
" Hiya, I was just curious, after reading some verifications going into great detail about how wonderful their meets are, do people ever leave bad veris? I know we can't name and shame but, what would you write in a veri if you were trying to make it clear that, for instance, the guy looked more like his father?! " It doesn't matter what you write, they wouldn't have it on display!! Ha! I wouldn't leave a verification, and I would also point out to them why it was bad. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good deal more than is currently the case" I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? | |||
"We had one bad meet.. He promised the earth.. A very specific planned outdoor meet... He turned up.. Delivered little and very quick... That sometimes happens and that not the issue but he did a runner ... Then asked us to veri him.... Didn't as what would we say? " Yep, it's hard/difficult!!!!!! Lol isn't it? I think the best comment so far has to be, "if you've nothing good to say, say nothing!" xxx | |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good deal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? " No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. | |||
| |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good deal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites." What sort of a report though ? | |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good deal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. What sort of a report though ? " Exactly the same format as a verification is now. | |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good deal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. What sort of a report though ? Exactly the same format as a verification is now." And you had no say in whether it was displayed or not ? | |||
| |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good dezal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. What sort of a report though ? Exactly the same format as a verification is now. And you had no say in whether it was displayed or not ? " None. The meet will have taken place and in all probability a good verification would be logged, as is always the case now, but it does give the opportunity to include aspects which would lead to it not being displayed under the existing system, which it seems to me is at the heart of the OP. | |||
| |||
| |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good dezal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. What sort of a report though ? Exactly the same format as a verification is now. And you had no say in whether it was displayed or not ? None. The meet will have taken place and in all probability a good verification would be logged, as is always the case now, but it does give the opportunity to include aspects which would lead to it not being displayed under the existing system, which it seems to me is at the heart of the OP." Dreadful idea. You could basically write anything you wanted about someone and the whole site could see it. The jealous and clingy types would love it though. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Hehehe I've only had one awful meet, his pictures must have been about 10 years out of date... To the point even he apologized for it... I gave him the benefit of the doubt and tried not to be so shallow, but it was crap. Lol won't be making that mistake again! I verified something along the lines of "showed up as arranged, but you really need to update those pictures wink wink". funnily enough, he didn't display it " This sounds very familiar!! Lol xx We live and learn ....... | |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good dezal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. What sort of a report though ? Exactly the same format as a verification is now. And you had no say in whether it was displayed or not ? None. The meet will have taken place and in all probability a good verification would be logged, as is always the case now, but it does give the opportunity to include aspects which would lead to it not being displayed under the existing system, which it seems to me is at the heart of the OP. Dreadful idea. You could basically write anything you wanted about someone and the whole site could see it. The jealous and clingy types would love it though. " Well you could write anything you want that's true, but unless you'd given them real cause to despise you, why would they write anything but the truth about how they perceived the way the meet went, and if it does include negative points, then it'd be a much more honest account. As I understand it, isn't that the point of this thread? | |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good deal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites." What other sites? | |||
"Hehehe I've only had one awful meet, his pictures must have been about 10 years out of date... To the point even he apologized for it... I gave him the benefit of the doubt and tried not to be so shallow, but it was crap. Lol won't be making that mistake again! I verified something along the lines of "showed up as arranged, but you really need to update those pictures wink wink". funnily enough, he didn't display it This sounds very familiar!! Lol xx We live and learn ....... " I don't go ahead if they turn up and are below expectations... | |||
| |||
| |||
"We like a social first, ever since the "looked like been dragged through a hedge backwards" incident " Always have a social meet first. Dodged many a bullet. Still recovering from the Robert Redford lookalike in his pictures who looked like Albert Steptoe Snr in reality! | |||
"Not had very many bad meets but once a guy had walked in the pouring rain for a mile to get to us ...he was a bit smelly to say the least ...I didnt have the heart to turn him away but wish I had after as I felt sick ...not to be repeated" That's when you suggest shower sex. | |||
"Not had very many bad meets but once a guy had walked in the pouring rain for a mile to get to us ...he was a bit smelly to say the least ...I didnt have the heart to turn him away but wish I had after as I felt sick ...not to be repeated That's when you suggest shower sex. " I will next time | |||
| |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good dezal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. What sort of a report though ? Exactly the same format as a verification is now. And you had no say in whether it was displayed or not ? None. The meet will have taken place and in all probability a good verification would be logged, as is always the case now, but it does give the opportunity to include aspects which would lead to it not being displayed under the existing system, which it seems to me is at the heart of the OP. Dreadful idea. You could basically write anything you wanted about someone and the whole site could see it. The jealous and clingy types would love it though. Well you could write anything you want that's true, but unless you'd given them real cause to despise you, why would they write anything but the truth about how they perceived the way the meet went, and if it does include negative points, then it'd be a much more honest account. As I understand it, isn't that the point of this thread?" Just a little example of how this could be abused. We arrange to meet a single fella/woman. All parties turn up on time. We decide for our own reasons that we don't want to play. Then they leave this veri. "Mrs P stinks off piss and Mr P turned up naked with a Johnny already attached to his erect cock" This would be displayed to the whole site and we couldn't do anything about it. | |||
"Not had very many bad meets but once a guy had walked in the pouring rain for a mile to get to us ...he was a bit smelly to say the least ...I didnt have the heart to turn him away but wish I had after as I felt sick ...not to be repeated That's when you suggest shower sex. " Hell yeah!!! We have a big bath too ?? | |||
| |||
| |||
"We like a social first, ever since the "looked like been dragged through a hedge backwards" incident Always have a social meet first. Dodged many a bullet. Still recovering from the Robert Redford lookalike in his pictures who looked like Albert Steptoe Snr in reality! " did you say "oh you dirty old man" | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"As it stands, the system is highly unlikely to show anything but glowing verifications, but if it were differently organised with a meet-booking record made on the site, followed by a report that would appear irrespective of the recipient's approval, then a much greater variety of estimation might well result that would make the content more informative....not in every case, but in a good dezal more than is currently the case I wod hate that. How would you relax if you knew a report was being written about you. Would a fab representative turn up with s clipboard ? No rep, no clipboard. The meet arrangement would be recorded online and would be the only way of then submitting a report which would then be displayed. You'd get a much more rounded assessment, probably most of them fine, but with the opportunity to include downsides if there were any. It seems to work on other sites. What sort of a report though ? Exactly the same format as a verification is now. And you had no say in whether it was displayed or not ? None. The meet will have taken place and in all probability a good verification would be logged, as is always the case now, but it does give the opportunity to include aspects which would lead to it not being displayed under the existing system, which it seems to me is at the heart of the OP. Dreadful idea. You could basically write anything you wanted about someone and the whole site could see it. The jealous and clingy types would love it though. Well you could write anything you want that's true, but unless you'd given them real cause to despise you, why would they write anything but the truth about how they perceived the way the meet went, and if it does include negative points, then it'd be a much more honest account. As I understand it, isn't that the point of this thread? Just a little example of how this could be abused. We arrange to meet a single fella/woman. All parties turn up on time. We decide for our own reasons that we don't want to play. Then they leave this veri. "Mrs P stinks off piss and Mr P turned up naked with a Johnny already attached to his erect cock" This would be displayed to the whole site and we couldn't do anything about it. " Yes indeed that could conceivably happen, though aborted meets like that are most likely very rare, and what's more, you could post your account of the same meet on his profile. Although his account of the meet would be negative, and if written as you describe, pretty unbelievable, it would hopefully be one bad verification amongst a range of highly positive ones, and thereby stand out as all the less credible. I'm not saying abuse of the system would be impossible, but it might make the content of verifications generally a good deal more helpful than it is now, particularly by unveiling any irritating no-shows. | |||