FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > radioactive tobacco vs organic
radioactive tobacco vs organic
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
"All plants are likely to be ingesting similar air borne gases and many plants don't have smooth leaf surfaces. So it doesn't sound like an issue limited to tobacco plants, but could affect food plants. If you have valid research materials from recognized scientific journals then I'm curious. " But it does effect all resinous plants including veg and fruit. That's why organic only 20 odd years. Most feeds they spay plants with have lead 210 and Polonium-210 but they keep this one quiet | |||
"All plants are likely to be ingesting similar air borne gases and many plants don't have smooth leaf surfaces. So it doesn't sound like an issue limited to tobacco plants, but could affect food plants. If you have valid research materials from recognized scientific journals then I'm curious. " And yes I do...but is world of secrets concerning...all about money like everything else | |||
| |||
" Isn't much of Devon radioactive? Double whammy if yer a smoker there. " Yes your right sure is..intact poor nudists get a raw deal is uranium nodes all day to over the beach. When was last there was a woman sat on one. I tried to explain she would get a radioactive pussy haha but she just looked at me like was a dafty and couninued to sit on the node. (Was joking with her about radioactive pussy...seemed funny at time...maybe too much cider  ) | |||
| |||
" Isn't much of Devon radioactive? Double whammy if yer a smoker there. Yes your right sure is..intact poor nudists get a raw deal is uranium nodes all day to over the beach. When was last there was a woman sat on one. I tried to explain she would get a radioactive pussy haha but she just looked at me like was a dafty and couninued to sit on the node. (Was joking with her about radioactive pussy...seemed funny at time...maybe too much cider )"Does a radioactive pussy become orgasmic? | |||
" Does a radioactive pussy become orgasmic? " Glow in the dark pussy
| |||
I used to use the Banana Equivalent Dose table when I was a Nuclear Safety trainer - it's a bit of fun in what's quite a dry subject
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15288975 | |||
"Every time you eat a banana you're ingesting ionising radiation...so banana scoffing smokers have no chance
I used to use the Banana Equivalent Dose table when I was a Nuclear Safety trainer - it's a bit of fun in what's quite a dry subject
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15288975"What's the equivalent dose when people insert the bananananana rather than eat it? | |||
"Every time you eat a banana you're ingesting ionising radiation...so banana scoffing smokers have no chance
I used to use the Banana Equivalent Dose table when I was a Nuclear Safety trainer - it's a bit of fun in what's quite a dry subject
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15288975
What's the equivalent dose when people insert the bananananana rather than eat it?"If I'm ever called upon to train a bunch of swingers in Nuclear Safety, that could be one of the exercises | |||
Googly Gimp | |||
"Every time you eat a banana you're ingesting ionising radiation...so banana scoffing smokers have no chance
I used to use the Banana Equivalent Dose table when I was a Nuclear Safety trainer - it's a bit of fun in what's quite a dry subject
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15288975
What's the equivalent dose when people insert the bananananana rather than eat it?
If I'm ever called upon to train a bunch of swingers in Nuclear Safety, that could be one of the exercises "Ooh you could use glow in the dark condoms as training props too | |||
| |||
"Call me Crash Test Dummy but i thought all Plants were Organic
Googly Gimp"Don't be daft. They're real, which makes them Physical. Unless they're on here and then they're virtual. Proffesional Virago | |||
A | |||
"We're all DOOOOOOOOOMED !!!
A"What with tattoos, radioactive fags and barebackers it's a wonder we're not all already dead. Maybe we are but haven't realised it yet. | |||
"We're all DOOOOOOOOOMED !!!
A
What with tattoos, radioactive fags and barebackers it's a wonder we're not all already dead.
Maybe we are but haven't realised it yet. "Like Lost?
Ooh - now there's a conspiracy theory!
A | |||
"Call me Crash Test Dummy but i thought all Plants were Organic
Googly Gimp
Don't be daft. They're real, which makes them Physical. Unless they're on here and then they're virtual.
Proffesional Virago"Thanks for clearing that up..I now need to go lie down in a dark room with my Plutonium enriched Crayon
Germicidal Gimp | |||
| |||
"A glow in the dark gimp, can see it now "Of course you can see it! It glows in the dark!! 
Duh!!!! 
A | |||
"Right all tobaccos other than organic additive free tobacco is radio active. This is fact and always has been covered up!! Tobacco plants also absorb tiny dust particles from the air that are loaded with small amounts of radioactive material, including polonium and other radioactive elements that eventually decay into it. These radioactive dust particles clump onto the sticky, hair-like projections (called trichomes) that thickly cover both sides of tobacco leaves. Cigarettes deliver dangerously concentrated doses of radioactivity directly into the lungs. When smokers inhale, the radioactive particles damage lung tissue, creating ‘hot spots’ of damage. This is my personal opinion however is backed up by many reports and studies including ones by cancer research UK and several other govs. That if you stick too only organic additive free tobacco just like the native American Indians did when they first introduced tobacco to the world...would it actually benefit your health rather than damage it. The reason people get lung cancer... Heart disease eetc is down to the tobacco being radioactive and nothing more. What's peoples thoughts?" My thoughts are: Can you cite the references for these studies you're referring to? And if tobacco "absorbs radioactive dust particles from the air" then how would growing it organically prevent that? | |||
"Right all tobaccos other than organic additive free tobacco is radio active. This is fact and always has been covered up!! Tobacco plants also absorb tiny dust particles from the air that are loaded with small amounts of radioactive material, including polonium and other radioactive elements that eventually decay into it. These radioactive dust particles clump onto the sticky, hair-like projections (called trichomes) that thickly cover both sides of tobacco leaves. Cigarettes deliver dangerously concentrated doses of radioactivity directly into the lungs. When smokers inhale, the radioactive particles damage lung tissue, creating ‘hot spots’ of damage. This is my personal opinion however is backed up by many reports and studies including ones by cancer research UK and several other govs. That if you stick too only organic additive free tobacco just like the native American Indians did when they first introduced tobacco to the world...would it actually benefit your health rather than damage it. The reason people get lung cancer... Heart disease eetc is down to the tobacco being radioactive and nothing more. What's peoples thoughts? My thoughts are: Can you cite the references for these studies you're referring to? And if tobacco "absorbs radioactive dust particles from the air" then how would growing it organically prevent that? " Take a look back at his thread about killer tattoos to see how good he is at backing up his conspiracy theories with evidence. | |||
| |||
"Right all tobaccos other than organic additive free tobacco is radio active. This is fact and always has been covered up!! Tobacco plants also absorb tiny dust particles from the air that are loaded with small amounts of radioactive material, including polonium and other radioactive elements that eventually decay into it. These radioactive dust particles clump onto the sticky, hair-like projections (called trichomes) that thickly cover both sides of tobacco leaves. Cigarettes deliver dangerously concentrated doses of radioactivity directly into the lungs. When smokers inhale, the radioactive particles damage lung tissue, creating ‘hot spots’ of damage. This is my personal opinion however is backed up by many reports and studies including ones by cancer research UK and several other govs. That if you stick too only organic additive free tobacco just like the native American Indians did when they first introduced tobacco to the world...would it actually benefit your health rather than damage it. The reason people get lung cancer... Heart disease eetc is down to the tobacco being radioactive and nothing more. What's peoples thoughts? My thoughts are: Can you cite the references for these studies you're referring to? And if tobacco "absorbs radioactive dust particles from the air" then how would growing it organically prevent that? Take a look back at his thread about killer tattoos to see how good he is at backing up his conspiracy theories with evidence. " Hahaha oh god TL:DR! I wondered if something like this was the case. I will say this. There is a fine line between eccentricity and madness! | |||
| |||
"My thoughts on this, knowing Nicotiana species (tobacco plants are in this genus) very well, are that other more widely consumed plants have some similar characteristics to tobacco plants. Take tomato plants as an example. Tomatoes,( a species of Solanum) - many of us grow them - have many fine trichomes or hairs upon their plants, in a somewhat like manner to tobacco Nicotiana. If the uptake and concentration is partly from the hairs trapping particles from the air, then it's likely that tomatoes also do this. I don't know the comparison between these two species and assume that there's been little scientific testing to compare them. All plants may potentially uptake chemicals from the soil, via the osmotic process in their roots, or if gases are released from the soil: they'd then potentially enter via the stomata, the cake holes in the leaves where gaseous exchange normally occurs. Whether tobacco plant roots uptake radioactive chemicals more readily than other plants, including tomatoes, is something that I'm not aware of. Phosphorous is an element that exists in small quantities on earth with an extra neutron and is radioactive. Its half life is just a few days, so it decays rapidly. Roots do uptake Phosphorous, and it's primarily used to stimulte further root development. But again, without evidence, there's no reason to assume that tobacco plants are any more able to uptake Phosphorous than other plant species are, such as the tomato plant. In any event, Phosphorous is an essential nutrient requirement for plants, and if the soil contains radioactive Phosphorous (even though there's a small amount of it on the planet), all plants should uptake it, where it would remain, before decaying in a month or so. Obviously there are other radioactive elements on earth, some having a more localised concentration than others. Whilst soil borne, they would likely be fairly similarly absorbed by plants with near equivalent characteristics. Again, tomatoes and tobacco have hairy stems, so we don't know their comparable uptake levels of radioactive materials. Organic growing largely relates to the use of chemical additives upon plants - it doesn't mean that growing media are devoid of radioactive chemicals. If any plant is grown in an environment that doesn't contain compounds that are radioactive and where contact with radioactive elements is prohibited, then the plants should remain similarly radioactive - or not - through their lives. If chemical fertilisers are added, these would potentially prohibit the plant from being referred to as organic. But if the radioactivity is present in the soil, or enters the plant during its growth, from the air, rain etc, then it could still be deemed as organic, but could result in a radioactive plant, whether it is tobacco or any other plant. So, the op should consider revealing more, rather than just provision of a teasing post. It's likely that any industry that's aware of potential risks would wish to keep some things secret - and we know the tobacco industry did that with cigarettes and lung cancer. Interested in what the op knows further, and the relative risks between tobacco and other plants with trichomes that the public consumes." Admit it. You're Alan Titchmarsh!
A | |||
"We're all DOOOOOOOOOMED !!!
A
What with tattoos, radioactive fags and barebackers it's a wonder we're not all already dead.
Maybe we are but haven't realised it yet.
Like Lost?
Ooh - now there's a conspiracy theory!
A"Oh no, please don't tell me you're all AI constructs and I've been talking to myself again. | |||
"A glow in the dark gimp, can see it now
Of course you can see it!
It glows in the dark!!
Duh!!!!
A"Oi you lot ive told you before the Course of Penicillin cured that little Problem
Glowin Gimp | |||
