If you use Google Chrome, "search google for this image" is one of the options when you click on an image.
But it's time is passing, since more people are aware of it, so use pics harvested from sites behind firewalls, such as Facebook etc. Google does not find these.
So as ^^^^ said, gut instinct and healthy scepticism are just as important.
Mr ddc
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
The problem with it is...lots of people use pics on lots of sites including amateur ones so the people may not be fakes just because you find a pic elsewhere. Sadly people automatically thing they are.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *bi HaiveMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Cheeseville, Somerset |
"The problem with it is...lots of people use pics on lots of sites including amateur ones so the people may not be fakes just because you find a pic elsewhere. Sadly people automatically thing they are.
"
It's still a useful tool. Yes - people post on amateur sites and other swinging sites - but finding several hundred hits on eastern European porn sites, with original uncropped images showing faces of people who don't match other pics in a profile, or famous porn stars, or Bollywood actors, or sportsmen, or ten year old postings on amateur sites when the profile is from an 18-21 year old.......you get my drift!
It's a useful tool - along with common sense and gut instinct.
A |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The problem with it is...lots of people use pics on lots of sites including amateur ones so the people may not be fakes just because you find a pic elsewhere. Sadly people automatically think they are.
"
True, but when they're on Russian porn sites as Katya from Kazakhstan I tend to get suspicious.
I also remember, on another site, finding a pic first uploaded elsewhere in 2005, on a profile by someone claiming to be 22!
I could say more, but last time it didn't end well
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Anyone ever considered that Google Reverse Image Search or TinEye are more succesful at gathering unlimited personal and private images than Sydney University will ever be?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The problem with it is...lots of people use pics on lots of sites including amateur ones so the people may not be fakes just because you find a pic elsewhere. Sadly people automatically thing they are.
It's still a useful tool. Yes - people post on amateur sites and other swinging sites - but finding several hundred hits on eastern European porn sites, with original uncropped images showing faces of people who don't match other pics in a profile, or famous porn stars, or Bollywood actors, or sportsmen, or ten year old postings on amateur sites when the profile is from an 18-21 year old.......you get my drift!
It's a useful tool - along with common sense and gut instinct.
A"
This found two similar today multiple porn sites heads not matching body shots. Both still on here after being reported.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Anyone ever considered that Google Reverse Image Search or TinEye are more succesful at gathering unlimited personal and private images than Sydney University will ever be?
"
Lol, an interesting point, no-one wants GCHQ reading their emails, but happy to trust Mr Google with a pic of a piece of fruit up their foof.
When it's really worrying is when the images are then sold on to advertisers. The man from DelMonte says "Cor blimey, you don't get many of them to the pound" 
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Anyone ever considered that Google Reverse Image Search or TinEye are more succesful at gathering unlimited personal and private images than Sydney University will ever be?
Lol, an interesting point, no-one wants GCHQ reading their emails, but happy to trust Mr Google with a pic of a piece of fruit up their foof.
When it's really worrying is when the images are then sold on to advertisers. The man from DelMonte says "Cor blimey, you don't get many of them to the pound"
"
Not to mention the quantity of syrup involved. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I've just Google searched my pics on here.... No results... But I suddenly then thought, shite how would I feel if it came up 'found'.... I'd probably freak out, so stopped lol.
Talk about scaring the crap out of myself!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I've just Google searched my pics on here.... No results... But I suddenly then thought, shite how would I feel if it came up 'found'.... I'd probably freak out, so stopped lol.
Talk about scaring the crap out of myself!! "
That's what started me thinking. I would regularly search for our pics, in case they'd been copied elsewhere. Then, for a period when we first joined here, and were still on the other site, I realised I should have got a hit, as some of our pics were on both sites. That's when I learned about the firewall.
So someone could nick your pics, put them on a site like this, and you'd be none the wiser. That is why we have no face pics, and no pics with backgrounds linkable directly to us.
I'd feel a lot more comfortable if, rather than sticking up for people with multiple hits, sites like this insisted on photo-verification whenever there was the slightest doubt.
This site has plenty of genuine peeps, we can safely lose the others surely?
Mr ddc
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
"The problem with it is...lots of people use pics on lots of sites including amateur ones so the people may not be fakes just because you find a pic elsewhere. Sadly people automatically thing they are.
It's still a useful tool. Yes - people post on amateur sites and other swinging sites - but finding several hundred hits on eastern European porn sites, with original uncropped images showing faces of people who don't match other pics in a profile, or famous porn stars, or Bollywood actors, or sportsmen, or ten year old postings on amateur sites when the profile is from an 18-21 year old.......you get my drift!
It's a useful tool - along with common sense and gut instinct.
A"
Of course for obvious fake pics it is a useful tool....the point is though, some people cant differentiate between the two, they just see it on a reverse image site and think yep...fake.
There are also three PV porn stars on here ( that I know of, there could be more ) and a couple of PV'd famous people with their face on show....swings and roundabouts.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The problem with it is...lots of people use pics on lots of sites including amateur ones so the people may not be fakes just because you find a pic elsewhere. Sadly people automatically thing they are.
It's still a useful tool. Yes - people post on amateur sites and other swinging sites - but finding several hundred hits on eastern European porn sites, with original uncropped images showing faces of people who don't match other pics in a profile, or famous porn stars, or Bollywood actors, or sportsmen, or ten year old postings on amateur sites when the profile is from an 18-21 year old.......you get my drift!
It's a useful tool - along with common sense and gut instinct.
A
Of course for obvious fake pics it is a useful tool....the point is though, some people cant differentiate between the two, they just see it on a reverse image site and think yep...fake.
There are also three PV porn stars on here ( that I know of, there could be more ) and a couple of PV'd famous people with their face on show....swings and roundabouts.
"
What's PV? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What's PV? "
Photo-verification.
Sometimes if there is a questionmark over a profile the users are asked to prove that they are really the same people as in the photos.
We're not really interested in meeting porn-stars, somehow I don't think I'd be up to their standards.
Gutted we may have turned down Beyonce though on the other site
Mr ddc |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
