FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Green Party Manifesto

Green Party Manifesto

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *oo hot OP   Couple  over a year ago

North West

Quite scary stuff here. Even more so when you think that 11% of the population have their support.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

For those who can't be bothered to copy and paste here are some highlights...

In the short term, a Green administration would impose a string of new taxes, ramp up public spending to unprecedented levels and decriminalise drugs, brothels and membership of terrorist groups.

In the long term, they want to fundamentally change life as we know it.

They want a zero growth economy (even Zkarl Marx accepted that growth was needed).

The flagship policy is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income of £71 a week for everyone living in Britain “as a right of citizenship”, regardless of wealth or whether they are seeking work.

Under Green plans, inheritance tax – “to prevent the accumulation of wealth and power by a privileged class” – will no longer just tax the dead.

Under radical reforms, it will cover gifts made while the giver is still alive – raising the prospect of levies on cars, jewellery or furniture given by parents to their children.

The trade and cultivation of cannabis will be decriminalised under Green policy, along with possession of Class A and B drugs for personal use. Anti-rave laws would be scrapped.

Higher taxes will be brought in on alcohol and tobacco, and a complete alcohol advertising ban imposed.

All elements of the sex industry will be decriminalised, and prostitutes could no longer be discriminated against in child custody cases.

The Greens also want to see “significantly reduced” levels of imprisonment, with jail only used when there is a “substantial risk of a further grave crime” or in cases where offences are so horrific that offenders would be at risk of vigilantes. Prisoners will be given the vote.

The Greens will aim for all energy to be supplied from renewables, with wind the main source of power by 2030.

Under a new hierarchy for transport, pedestrians and bikes come first – and aeroplanes last.

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

No more new airports or runways will be built, and existing ones nationalised. All new homes and businesses must by law provide bicycle parking. Helicopter travel would be regulated “more strictly”. The sale of alcohol on planes and airports will be tightly restricted to prevent air-rage, and the air on inbound flights tested for disease.

Advertising of holiday flights will be controlled by law to halt the “promotion of a high-carbon lifestyle”. New taxes would be imposed on carriers to reduce passenger numbers.

Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines.

“We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.” A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Quite scary stuff here. Even more so when you think that 11% of the population have their support.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

For those who can't be bothered to copy and paste here are some highlights...

In the short term, a Green administration would impose a string of new taxes, ramp up public spending to unprecedented levels and decriminalise drugs, brothels and membership of terrorist groups.

In the long term, they want to fundamentally change life as we know it.

They want a zero growth economy (even Zkarl Marx accepted that growth was needed).

The flagship policy is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income of £71 a week for everyone living in Britain “as a right of citizenship”, regardless of wealth or whether they are seeking work.

Under Green plans, inheritance tax – “to prevent the accumulation of wealth and power by a privileged class” – will no longer just tax the dead.

Under radical reforms, it will cover gifts made while the giver is still alive – raising the prospect of levies on cars, jewellery or furniture given by parents to their children.

The trade and cultivation of cannabis will be decriminalised under Green policy, along with possession of Class A and B drugs for personal use. Anti-rave laws would be scrapped.

Higher taxes will be brought in on alcohol and tobacco, and a complete alcohol advertising ban imposed.

All elements of the sex industry will be decriminalised, and prostitutes could no longer be discriminated against in child custody cases.

The Greens also want to see “significantly reduced” levels of imprisonment, with jail only used when there is a “substantial risk of a further grave crime” or in cases where offences are so horrific that offenders would be at risk of vigilantes. Prisoners will be given the vote.

The Greens will aim for all energy to be supplied from renewables, with wind the main source of power by 2030.

Under a new hierarchy for transport, pedestrians and bikes come first – and aeroplanes last.

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

No more new airports or runways will be built, and existing ones nationalised. All new homes and businesses must by law provide bicycle parking. Helicopter travel would be regulated “more strictly”. The sale of alcohol on planes and airports will be tightly restricted to prevent air-rage, and the air on inbound flights tested for disease.

Advertising of holiday flights will be controlled by law to halt the “promotion of a high-carbon lifestyle”. New taxes would be imposed on carriers to reduce passenger numbers.

Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines.

“We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.” A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.

"

.

It's only scary if your thinking is conventional.

The world's problems will be either forced on you right at the end of your denial in an anarchic final acceptance or.

You can change now while we still have services, cheap energy and law and order.

You pays your money you takes your chances

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If you hadn't mentioned that this was the Green Party's manifesto OP, I might have mistaken it for that of the Monster Raving Loony party.

On second thoughts, I don't think even the MRL Party are THAT bonkers!!!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

My personal highlights are

giving prisoners the vote

Banning alcohol advertising

REDUCING border controls

the part about the army bases and the arms industry was pretty good too

They do love their wind turbines

The future is BRIGHT the future is GREEN

I think they should adopt the catchphrase

The future is BRIGHT the future is WINDY

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

at first glance the aims for less reliance on carbon energy and the use of none carbon fuel vehicles looks a good idea though the timeline is not 'do-able'..

not sure how a no growth economy works tbh..

the defence stuff is barking given the state of play and the border controls probably reflects the reality but is a none starter..

all in all a mixed bag..

when do ukip put there's out..?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Hello Too Hot,

it's not slightly scary at all, it is total lunacy.

I don't know where they think up all these ideas, wind power is unreliable and too expensive. Economically their policies would be disastrous for our economy and the idea that we should be taxed out of flying on holiday and forced to run silly little cars is not exactly giving the population some pleasure for the dubious benefit to 'global warming'

Alec

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Some of it makes good logical sense to me. Some I'd need to understand more before taking a view. Some I simply disagree with.

It has though encouraged me to actually read their full manifesto.

It's certainly not all bonkers although I suggest much of it simply could not be achieved.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

They laughed at Einstein, Galileo, Columbus, Tesla they even poked fun at king Hubert.

They were all proven right in the end.

The lifestyle we've grown accustomed too for all its advancements is now at an end.

You can either confront it openly like adults, we don't believe in down playing the problems that face us just to get votes.

If you wish to be lied to and treated like a child over our problems then by all means vote for one of the main parties, but that won't stop the problems facing the planet coming to bite you on the arse eventually, it will just be worse then

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Quite scary stuff here. Even more so when you think that 11% of the population have their support.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

For those who can't be bothered to copy and paste here are some highlights...

In the short term, a Green administration would impose a string of new taxes, ramp up public spending to unprecedented levels and decriminalise drugs, brothels and membership of terrorist groups.

In the long term, they want to fundamentally change life as we know it."

Taxes are shit, but they'll go up whichever party is in. Can't see who this will affect more or how though.

Drugs are pretty much decriminalised anyway because we prefer to treat drug problems with rehabilitation rather than punishment because punishment doesn't work very well.

Brothels are safer than 'walking the street', not sure people like having sex or earning money by offering sexual services though so it could cause problems here.

Greenpeace is probably classed as a terrorist group tbf so they are looking after their own interests there.


"They want a zero growth economy (even Zkarl Marx accepted that growth was needed)."

Meh, marx shmarx, old news, get with the times and how the economy is messing up the planet.


"The flagship policy is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income of £71 a week for everyone living in Britain “as a right of citizenship”, regardless of wealth or whether they are seeking work."

Omfg, everyone will be entitled to money and no sanctions....fucking miracle, i am voting these people in. They know exactly how to fix an economy and keep money flowing, especially to the people needing it. I love you greens, mwah, mwah, mwah...etc.

Most of the worthy jobs pay literally nothing, this is great news! And people will never need to fear starvation again, possibly be able to put their heating on too.


"Under Green plans, inheritance tax – “to prevent the accumulation of wealth and power by a privileged class” – will no longer just tax the dead.

Under radical reforms, it will cover gifts made while the giver is still alive – raising the prospect of levies on cars, jewellery or furniture given by parents to their children. "

Yeah, yeah more taxes, that's cool. I'm actually quite spiritual and don't see the point in owning things, so this is ok to me.


"The trade and cultivation of cannabis will be decriminalised under Green policy, along with possession of Class A and B drugs for personal use. Anti-rave laws would be scrapped.

Higher taxes will be brought in on alcohol and tobacco, and a complete alcohol advertising ban imposed.

All elements of the sex industry will be decriminalised, and prostitutes could no longer be discriminated against in child custody cases.

The Greens also want to see “significantly reduced” levels of imprisonment, with jail only used when there is a “substantial risk of a further grave crime” or in cases where offences are so horrific that offenders would be at risk of vigilantes. Prisoners will be given the vote."

Progressive thinking. I do like this. Think i'm a bit old for raves but giving people autonomy is great. When you give people more freedom they make better choices, especially if you add in the rehabilitation mentioned earlier.


"The Greens will aim for all energy to be supplied from renewables, with wind the main source of power by 2030."

Not sure about this. I like how we can recycle poop waste for fuel, those windmills look nice but seem a bit flimsy.


"Under a new hierarchy for transport, pedestrians and bikes come first – and aeroplanes last."

Yeah, less pollution, fitter people, good, good. The law already says humans have priority over vehicles anyway, so next time you see an old lady waiting to cross the road let them across or you're breaking the law (probably).


"Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars."

I don't have a car so this is good.


"No more new airports or runways will be built, and existing ones nationalised."

Cool. Hope this works and brings prices down, although with my extra £71 a week i can afford the prices now.


"All new homes and businesses must by law provide bicycle parking."

Er ok. Possibly pointless.


"Helicopter travel would be regulated “more strictly”. The sale of alcohol on planes and airports will be tightly restricted to prevent air-rage, and the air on inbound flights tested for disease."

Ugh, i won't be able to pick up my kids from school in my helicopter any more?

I don't drink, but seeing as they're taxing alcohol more they might have cut their nose to spite their face here.

Disease testing, making me safer? Cool.


"Advertising of holiday flights will be controlled by law to halt the “promotion of a high-carbon lifestyle”. New taxes would be imposed on carriers to reduce passenger numbers."

Does need an overhaul (worldwide really), they haven't been profiting for ages now and been propped up by taxes for ages because of it.


"Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines."

'Merica. Kind of concerned we will become a terroirist nation and war target if this happens.


"“We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.” A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.

"

Nice one. If anyone has managed to hide in this country for 5 years and escape evasion they must be intelligent and have a good network outside of the system, well done guys, come big up our country.

Yeah, nice to hear this stuff. Would have loved more details but sounds alright tbh.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I meant escape detection for that last bit.

Well people are gonna have to start being more responsible if they get in. Don't know if our selfish and naive society can take that?

They also like meat free monday because it means more land available for crop type foods, much much more and therefore a good solution to the growing population and a possible future food crisis. And less animal cruelty of course. Surprised that didn't get a mention.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It is why Cameron wants them on the TV debates, makes his policies look positively brilliant

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Is that the actual manifesto or a journalistic interpretation of it with a smattering of spin thrown in for good measure ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *bi HaiveMan  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

I hope they're publishing the manifesto in online format only!

These things are quite hefty in terms of pages!

Think of all the poor trees!

*internet paper and ink is far greener!

A

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *yrdwomanWoman  over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

Because every party has stuck religiously to their manifesto once voted in.

And the Green Party has an strict environmentally friendly manifesto? The horror!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars."

This alone would cost them my vote.

Politicians are elected to serve the people. I won't have some politician telling me what sort of car I can or can not drive. Last time I checked we lived in a democratic free country.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

This alone would cost them my vote.

Politicians are elected to serve the people. I won't have some politician telling me what sort of car I can or can not drive. Last time I checked we lived in a democratic free country.

"

Bigger engine - more tax, it's exactly what happens already.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *thwalescplCouple  over a year ago

brecon

If you want to see the Greens in action, take a look at Brighton.... a glimpse into how bad it could be... and its going downhill fast!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is that the actual manifesto or a journalistic interpretation of it with a smattering of spin thrown in for good measure ?

"

.

There's the usual, but it ain't worth arguing with them!.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is that the actual manifesto or a journalistic interpretation of it with a smattering of spin thrown in for good measure ?

"

.

They always argue with ooooooo wind mills everywhere and ooooh I bet you drove here you hypocrite.

All you can do is keep smiling and keep telling people who want to listen the point of the policy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If you want to see the Greens in action, take a look at Brighton.... a glimpse into how bad it could be... and its going downhill fast!"

How bad is it? I can't get there atm.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UNCHBOXMan  over a year ago

folkestone


"Quite scary stuff here. Even more so when you think that 11% of the population have their support.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

For those who can't be bothered to copy and paste here are some highlights...

In the short term, a Green administration would impose a string of new taxes, ramp up public spending to unprecedented levels and decriminalise drugs, brothels and membership of terrorist groups.

In the long term, they want to fundamentally change life as we know it.

They want a zero growth economy (even Zkarl Marx accepted that growth was needed).

The flagship policy is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income of £71 a week for everyone living in Britain “as a right of citizenship”, regardless of wealth or whether they are seeking work.

Under Green plans, inheritance tax – “to prevent the accumulation of wealth and power by a privileged class” – will no longer just tax the dead.

Under radical reforms, it will cover gifts made while the giver is still alive – raising the prospect of levies on cars, jewellery or furniture given by parents to their children.

The trade and cultivation of cannabis will be decriminalised under Green policy, along with possession of Class A and B drugs for personal use. Anti-rave laws would be scrapped.

Higher taxes will be brought in on alcohol and tobacco, and a complete alcohol advertising ban imposed.

All elements of the sex industry will be decriminalised, and prostitutes could no longer be discriminated against in child custody cases.

The Greens also want to see “significantly reduced” levels of imprisonment, with jail only used when there is a “substantial risk of a further grave crime” or in cases where offences are so horrific that offenders would be at risk of vigilantes. Prisoners will be given the vote.

The Greens will aim for all energy to be supplied from renewables, with wind the main source of power by 2030.

Under a new hierarchy for transport, pedestrians and bikes come first – and aeroplanes last.

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

No more new airports or runways will be built, and existing ones nationalised. All new homes and businesses must by law provide bicycle parking. Helicopter travel would be regulated “more strictly”. The sale of alcohol on planes and airports will be tightly restricted to prevent air-rage, and the air on inbound flights tested for disease.

Advertising of holiday flights will be controlled by law to halt the “promotion of a high-carbon lifestyle”. New taxes would be imposed on carriers to reduce passenger numbers.

Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines.

“We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.” A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.

"

Makes Michael Foot's 1983 Labour manifesto look normal.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Quite scary stuff here. Even more so when you think that 11% of the population have their support.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

For those who can't be bothered to copy and paste here are some highlights...

In the short term, a Green administration would impose a string of new taxes, ramp up public spending to unprecedented levels and decriminalise drugs, brothels and membership of terrorist groups.

In the long term, they want to fundamentally change life as we know it.

They want a zero growth economy (even Zkarl Marx accepted that growth was needed).

The flagship policy is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income of £71 a week for everyone living in Britain “as a right of citizenship”, regardless of wealth or whether they are seeking work.

Under Green plans, inheritance tax – “to prevent the accumulation of wealth and power by a privileged class” – will no longer just tax the dead.

Under radical reforms, it will cover gifts made while the giver is still alive – raising the prospect of levies on cars, jewellery or furniture given by parents to their children.

The trade and cultivation of cannabis will be decriminalised under Green policy, along with possession of Class A and B drugs for personal use. Anti-rave laws would be scrapped.

Higher taxes will be brought in on alcohol and tobacco, and a complete alcohol advertising ban imposed.

All elements of the sex industry will be decriminalised, and prostitutes could no longer be discriminated against in child custody cases.

The Greens also want to see “significantly reduced” levels of imprisonment, with jail only used when there is a “substantial risk of a further grave crime” or in cases where offences are so horrific that offenders would be at risk of vigilantes. Prisoners will be given the vote.

The Greens will aim for all energy to be supplied from renewables, with wind the main source of power by 2030.

Under a new hierarchy for transport, pedestrians and bikes come first – and aeroplanes last.

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

No more new airports or runways will be built, and existing ones nationalised. All new homes and businesses must by law provide bicycle parking. Helicopter travel would be regulated “more strictly”. The sale of alcohol on planes and airports will be tightly restricted to prevent air-rage, and the air on inbound flights tested for disease.

Advertising of holiday flights will be controlled by law to halt the “promotion of a high-carbon lifestyle”. New taxes would be imposed on carriers to reduce passenger numbers.

Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines.

“We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.” A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.

Makes Michael Foot's 1983 Labour manifesto look normal. "

as normal as a man in his underpants called _unchbox with half a loaf on.... The concept of normal varies greatly amongst the population.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm thinking the Greens and a couple of commentators on here have been smoking a bit too much of the green.

While I absolutely agree the world needs wholesale change when it come to politics and politicians, and that change is coming, whether we are ready for it or not. The greens have a voice, tiny though it is, it is one of many little squeaks being heard and that's all it will ever amount to, a little squeak, barely heard above the ruckus. Clegg and his cronies are destined to join them once again. UKIP will be the kingmaker at the next election, unless the public take matters into their own hands and day by day, that looks increasingly likely. the major parties, not just in the UK, but across Europe and further afield are in for a very rude awakening this year.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm thinking the Greens and a couple of commentators on here have been smoking a bit too much of the green.

While I absolutely agree the world needs wholesale change when it come to politics and politicians, and that change is coming, whether we are ready for it or not. The greens have a voice, tiny though it is, it is one of many little squeaks being heard and that's all it will ever amount to, a little squeak, barely heard above the ruckus. Clegg and his cronies are destined to join them once again. UKIP will be the kingmaker at the next election, unless the public take matters into their own hands and day by day, that looks increasingly likely. the major parties, not just in the UK, but across Europe and further afield are in for a very rude awakening this year."

.

Squeak squeak.

Tell me which party is confronting depleted resources, climate change, energy, pollution, welfare, population growth.... No summer sea ice this year maybe! Never mind let's discuss financial rewards for fracking?.

The most acidic oceans for 15 million years! Never mind let's talk about potholes.

Worst floods for a hundred years. Let's talk about river dredging.

Volatile oil prices, banking crises, air pollution, glacier reduction..... Don't worry... Watch corrie, drink some cheap alcohol puke in the street.

While we bend you over and fuck you up the arse, while blaming all the problems on gypsies which we let in so we could blame them.

Yeah they've got all the answers

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm thinking the Greens and a couple of commentators on here have been smoking a bit too much of the green.

While I absolutely agree the world needs wholesale change when it come to politics and politicians, and that change is coming, whether we are ready for it or not. The greens have a voice, tiny though it is, it is one of many little squeaks being heard and that's all it will ever amount to, a little squeak, barely heard above the ruckus. Clegg and his cronies are destined to join them once again. UKIP will be the kingmaker at the next election, unless the public take matters into their own hands and day by day, that looks increasingly likely. the major parties, not just in the UK, but across Europe and further afield are in for a very rude awakening this year."

If that was to me? Yeah i have a sense of humour. Never felt the need to personally criticise anyone though. Attack the argument, not the poster. Otherwise you look like you have no argument.

Just about everyone in here has said nothing, just put a few random words with nothing to back them up (OP put a lot of words, with nothing to back them up). And this is why we have such a shit country, nobody really cares. Just make sweeping statements that mean nothing, just opinion. And everyone in power knows they are safe, even if they get voted out we still have to pay for them anyway.

Politics is a joke, full of jokers who get away with whatever they want. And that's ok, if you aren't interested in affecting anything just carry on voting and carry on paying taxes, they like that.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *UNCHBOXMan  over a year ago

folkestone


"Quite scary stuff here. Even more so when you think that 11% of the population have their support.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

For those who can't be bothered to copy and paste here are some highlights...

In the short term, a Green administration would impose a string of new taxes, ramp up public spending to unprecedented levels and decriminalise drugs, brothels and membership of terrorist groups.

In the long term, they want to fundamentally change life as we know it.

They want a zero growth economy (even Zkarl Marx accepted that growth was needed).

The flagship policy is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income of £71 a week for everyone living in Britain “as a right of citizenship”, regardless of wealth or whether they are seeking work.

Under Green plans, inheritance tax – “to prevent the accumulation of wealth and power by a privileged class” – will no longer just tax the dead.

Under radical reforms, it will cover gifts made while the giver is still alive – raising the prospect of levies on cars, jewellery or furniture given by parents to their children.

The trade and cultivation of cannabis will be decriminalised under Green policy, along with possession of Class A and B drugs for personal use. Anti-rave laws would be scrapped.

Higher taxes will be brought in on alcohol and tobacco, and a complete alcohol advertising ban imposed.

All elements of the sex industry will be decriminalised, and prostitutes could no longer be discriminated against in child custody cases.

The Greens also want to see “significantly reduced” levels of imprisonment, with jail only used when there is a “substantial risk of a further grave crime” or in cases where offences are so horrific that offenders would be at risk of vigilantes. Prisoners will be given the vote.

The Greens will aim for all energy to be supplied from renewables, with wind the main source of power by 2030.

Under a new hierarchy for transport, pedestrians and bikes come first – and aeroplanes last.

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

No more new airports or runways will be built, and existing ones nationalised. All new homes and businesses must by law provide bicycle parking. Helicopter travel would be regulated “more strictly”. The sale of alcohol on planes and airports will be tightly restricted to prevent air-rage, and the air on inbound flights tested for disease.

Advertising of holiday flights will be controlled by law to halt the “promotion of a high-carbon lifestyle”. New taxes would be imposed on carriers to reduce passenger numbers.

Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines.

“We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.” A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.

Makes Michael Foot's 1983 Labour manifesto look normal. as normal as a man in his underpants called _unchbox with half a loaf on.... The concept of normal varies greatly amongst the population."

Coming from someone who hasn't bothered to upload any pictures themselves, i don't know if to take that as a compliment or an insult!.

T

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's neither. It's just an observation

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *quirrelMan  over a year ago

East Manchester

The green party has some valid predictions, unfortunately their ideas are very delusional.

They think that by crippling this country they will make an impact on a global problem, they most definitely won't.

Whatever industry they regulate, no matter their intentions they will only shift the problem to another country.

The Australian gov't did a calculation on their carbon footprint and pollution of the air, sea and land, and after comparing it with other countries they predicted that if they were to halt all polluting industrial processes and went carbon neutral, market forces would mean that consumers would still be demanding the same goods and that the companies would just relocate to other less regulated countries.

Or put another way there would be a slight pause and then Australia's total pollution and carbon signature would be relocated elsewhere on the planet within months.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

If that was to me? Yeah i have a sense of humour. Never felt the need to personally criticise anyone though. Attack the argument, not the poster. Otherwise you look like you have no argument.

Just about everyone in here has said nothing, just put a few random words with nothing to back them up (OP put a lot of words, with nothing to back them up). And this is why we have such a shit country, nobody really cares. Just make sweeping statements that mean nothing, just opinion. And everyone in power knows they are safe, even if they get voted out we still have to pay for them anyway.

Politics is a joke, full of jokers who get away with whatever they want. And that's ok, if you aren't interested in affecting anything just carry on voting and carry on paying taxes, they like that."

Well said.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Well said. "

Thanks. Hope i didn't offend anyone. Just don't see the point in discussing stuff without any actual discussion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Well said.

Thanks. Hope i didn't offend anyone. Just don't see the point in discussing stuff without any actual discussion.

"

.

Most people outside of the green party are completely unaware of the ecological disaster that is only a short step around the corner.

For all the problems of jihadi John and extremism, they get an awful bigger share of news/press/general chit chat coverage, when was the last time you heard a conversation in a pub about the energy crises or the last serious documentary on the absolutely fucking pile of misery Fukushima is causing!.

First rule of politics and news is don't mention the problems you have no answers for.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Most people outside of the green party are completely unaware of the ecological disaster that is only a short step around the corner.

For all the problems of jihadi John and extremism, they get an awful bigger share of news/press/general chit chat coverage, when was the last time you heard a conversation in a pub about the energy crises or the last serious documentary on the absolutely fucking pile of misery Fukushima is causing!.

First rule of politics and news is don't mention the problems you have no answers for. "

I don't even know what jihadi john is anyway. Don't drink and haven't watched any documentaries for a while (no tv here, but could watch them on the internet i suppose). Will probably see if Noam Chomsky talks about it anywhere coz i like listening to him and understand what he says.

I'm well tired, been up since 2 am, gonna go to sleep. Would be nice if people researched more on why things are done a certain way and if other ways failed or were better, and from unbiased sources too (when possible).

I love history, neuroscience, psychology and anthropology. Got so much knowledge about it (not times or people or places so much) but how things were, how it affected us.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rnJEdDNDsI If anyone wants to be creeped out before bed watch that. Night.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

In fact you won't hear any answers on here to the problems because the answers don't suit them!.

Everybody loves foreign holidays, they love sitting in the sun and burning their arses and driving cars and central heating and washing machines and tumble dryers and spending more than they earn and endless borrowing and having loads of kids and cheap energy bills and Christmas lights and exponential growth and twinkly bits of shit and throwing stuff on tips and tossing their crap out of their cars and just generally being wasteful... Christ knows it's human nature were fighting, it's the intrinsically built in shit like believing in God and good and evil, all the stuff that doesn't even need to be taught it's just in yer, not like racism or bigotry or criminality, those man made ideologies that are taught t to you as kids, you can overcome them alot easier than sloth greed envy lust and wrath.

What you'll hear is alot of people claim that technology will find a solution or that all the scientists are wrong or that it won't make any difference because China will do it anyway or that it's years away don't worry about it.

It always makes me smile when I watch question time and a member of the audience says... I wish politicians would treat us like adults and be truthful... FFS

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

people go on and on about time wasters on here but now its official there's time wasters in politics as well.

its easy to spot them there called the monster raving loony green party

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"people go on and on about time wasters on here but now its official there's time wasters in politics as well.

its easy to spot them there called the monster raving loony green party "

and your solution to Fukushima is exactly what!.

Maybe you've got a solution for climate change,c02 amounts, acidic oceans, sea life depletion... No! The only thing your doing is adding to the methane time bomb problem oh that's a green joke you wouldn't get it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

I'm an undecided voter and don't know who will stand here. I'd have to do further research upon the Greens and others too, before deciding.

There is a lot of sense in some of their plans but the devil is in the detail. Sex industry, drugs, prisons and some of the taxation info, as well as global warming measures stack up well.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"people go on and on about time wasters on here but now its official there's time wasters in politics as well.

its easy to spot them there called the monster raving loony green party and your solution to Fukushima is exactly what!.

Maybe you've got a solution for climate change,c02 amounts, acidic oceans, sea life depletion... No! The only thing your doing is adding to the methane time bomb problem oh that's a green joke you wouldn't get it "

global warming ? bring it on have you been outside in the cold

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"people go on and on about time wasters on here but now its official there's time wasters in politics as well.

its easy to spot them there called the monster raving loony green party and your solution to Fukushima is exactly what!.

Maybe you've got a solution for climate change,c02 amounts, acidic oceans, sea life depletion... No! The only thing your doing is adding to the methane time bomb problem oh that's a green joke you wouldn't get it

global warming ? bring it on have you been outside in the cold

"

.

The term ‘global warming’ was first used in a 1975 Science article by geochemist Wallace Broecker of Columbia University. He wrote a paper called Climatic Change: Are We on the Brink of a Pronounced Global Warming(Note the use of the term climatic change).

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Typical mix of conflicting policies from the green. They want everyone to like them, so they promise something good for everyone. Even of they know they won't be able to deliver.

They have a couple socialist policies in there, but they have capitalists backers, who will not allow some of the bits that will cost them money

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You have to admire the Telegraph trying to out Daily Mail the Daily Mail with such a click bait URL

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *aughtyinguMan  over a year ago

swindon

On the growth thing, we have finite piles of resources, (some replenish) so our clamouring for growth year on year just accelorates our consumption...

And in the west most of us is consuming more than we should

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

This alone would cost them my vote.

Politicians are elected to serve the people. I won't have some politician telling me what sort of car I can or can not drive. Last time I checked we lived in a democratic free country.

"

Errrrrrrrm, when exactly was the last time you checked again???

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If it's true & that is actually the Greenies election manifesto then I have to say there are some interestingly refreshing 'policies' in there, - for once in a lifetime I'm actually quite impressed by a British political party!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ike4362ukMan  over a year ago

Cheshunt

I generally look to the Greens or independents for my local vote. I wouldn't trust the National Party to shit themselves properly.

Yes we need to be anti-coal for a slew of reasons, but there is a range of new nuclear processes that would silence many voices, and they are a lot closer than large scale fusion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm wondering how the plan to fund the £71 per person. To potential 30+ million people. That is gonna cost a minimum potential of £2,130,000,000. And that's before they included other welfare top ups to people that either can't work or can't find jobs

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I like the idea of cutting back on military expenditure though, - much cheaper & better all round to have a strong MOD than a tens of £ billions MOO that creates so many enemies!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

although I can see part of thier point about the military. We still need a standing army... Else we will be back in the position we were in before WWII. With a lack of skilled soldiers to defend us.

The only other way is a similar thing to Israel. Who has a very small standing army, but can call up a huge armed force in just days

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm wondering how the plan to fund the £71 per person. To potential 30+ million people. That is gonna cost a minimum potential of £2,130,000,000. And that's before they included other welfare top ups to people that either can't work or can't find jobs"

It costs something like 10bn more than the current welfare budget in total.

A tiny amount when you consider higher tax for the wealthy and tax-evading corporations.

Just gonna hijack this thread and say I fully support the Green Party and will continue to vote them. I don't see any other party providing us with anything different to what we have now, other than more fear and more censorship. No point being luddites and falling behind developing countries. Green Party are just what everyone else will be saying, in 20 years time, when its too late.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Google TUSC 2015 party policies. Far more sensible than the greens

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

They do look ok but until we move into a forward-thinking government, like the greens, nothing like this will have full support of the public.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston

Many of the Green policies are sound ecologically, economically and socially. Unfortunately added to them are manifestly stupid security policies that cant be ignored.

Why is it that all modern reforming politicians have to add such obviously mad policies to those clearly required and by doing so keep power in the hands of those who have a vested interest in the status quo?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Because the greens are not a social as the would have you believe. They are ideologically pashed for the supreme ecological agenda.

Which is all well and good until you start forcing it on to people, like taxing people that buy larger cars more.... What about large families that require 7 seaters... Are they going to be disproportionately taxed because they need the larger cars. I've not seen any pledge to increase the incentive to buy a hybrid or electric car.. which would be more to the point from the side of fuel efficiency and lower or no carbon emission cars.

They are socialists only skin deep. Beyond that they are just as capitalist as the other 4 main parties

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

This it from the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) 2015 policies for general election

PROTECT OUR ENVIRONMENT - STOP GLOBAL WARMING Deep cuts in greenhouse gas emissions - otherwise climate change, caused by capitalism, will destroy us. Invest in publicly-owned and controlled renewable energy. Move to sustainable, low-pollution industry and farming - stop the pollution that is destroying our environment. Produce for need, not profit, and design goods for reuse and recycling.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illwill69uMan  over a year ago

moston


" What about large families that require 7 seaters... Are they going to be disproportionately taxed because they need the larger cars. I've not seen any pledge to increase the incentive to buy a hybrid or electric car.. which would be more to the point from the side of fuel efficiency and lower or no carbon emission cars.

"

It strikes me that living on an overcrowded island that cant produce enough food to feed its population and has a serious shortage of decent housing for those here already that policies that tax excess (including producing offspring) are a good idea.

As for hybrid and electric cars, as I understand present technology, they are ecologically unsound when total carbon costs (including production) are compared to the latest generation of small low emission high efficiency petrol engines. Having said that I believe that the future lies in hydrogen fuel cells and that we should be pumping money into that technology.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Opposing id cards

Reducing corporation tax for smaller firms

Abolishing the CAP

Referendum on EU membership

Surely these and other manifesto commitments would appeal to the Telegraph readership (not sure about the tax exile proprietors).

And just on the smaller car point Mercedes Renault/Nissan and now Honda are using F1 motorsport to develop hybrid fuel efficient engines, Williams grand prix engineering have developed and marketed kinetic energy recovery systems that are fitted to Porches so the manufacturers will tell you what you'll be driving whether you like it or not.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Oh did I forget to mention breaking the link between private funding (personal as well as trade union) and political parties, why wouldn't the Telegraph bullet point that?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *otlovefun42Couple  over a year ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"Quite scary stuff here. Even more so when you think that 11% of the population have their support.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/11356354/Drugs-brothels-al-Qaeda-and-the-Beyonce-tax-the-Green-Party-plan-for-Britain.html

For those who can't be bothered to copy and paste here are some highlights...

In the short term, a Green administration would impose a string of new taxes, ramp up public spending to unprecedented levels and decriminalise drugs, brothels and membership of terrorist groups.

In the long term, they want to fundamentally change life as we know it.

They want a zero growth economy (even Zkarl Marx accepted that growth was needed).

The flagship policy is an unconditional, non-withdrawable income of £71 a week for everyone living in Britain “as a right of citizenship”, regardless of wealth or whether they are seeking work.

Under Green plans, inheritance tax – “to prevent the accumulation of wealth and power by a privileged class” – will no longer just tax the dead.

Under radical reforms, it will cover gifts made while the giver is still alive – raising the prospect of levies on cars, jewellery or furniture given by parents to their children.

The trade and cultivation of cannabis will be decriminalised under Green policy, along with possession of Class A and B drugs for personal use. Anti-rave laws would be scrapped.

Higher taxes will be brought in on alcohol and tobacco, and a complete alcohol advertising ban imposed.

All elements of the sex industry will be decriminalised, and prostitutes could no longer be discriminated against in child custody cases.

The Greens also want to see “significantly reduced” levels of imprisonment, with jail only used when there is a “substantial risk of a further grave crime” or in cases where offences are so horrific that offenders would be at risk of vigilantes. Prisoners will be given the vote.

The Greens will aim for all energy to be supplied from renewables, with wind the main source of power by 2030.

Under a new hierarchy for transport, pedestrians and bikes come first – and aeroplanes last.

Buses and trains will be electric by 2030, while taxes and regulations will be imposed to force people to buy smaller, lighter and less-powerful cars.

No more new airports or runways will be built, and existing ones nationalised. All new homes and businesses must by law provide bicycle parking. Helicopter travel would be regulated “more strictly”. The sale of alcohol on planes and airports will be tightly restricted to prevent air-rage, and the air on inbound flights tested for disease.

Advertising of holiday flights will be controlled by law to halt the “promotion of a high-carbon lifestyle”. New taxes would be imposed on carriers to reduce passenger numbers.

Britain will leave NATO, end the special relationship with the US, and unilaterally abandon nuclear weapons. A standing army, navy and airforce is “unnecessary”. Bases will be turned into nature reserves and the arms industry “converted” to producing windturbines.

“We will work to create a world of global inter-responsibility in which the concept of a 'British national' is irrelevant and outdated.” A Green Government will “progressively reduce” border controls, including an amnesty for illegal immigrants after five years.

"

At the last German election they wanted to legalise incest and lower the age of consent to 14.

A strong green party is a bloody nightmare. You buy a tin of paint here and it's like piss because they've got half of the ingredients banned. Bleach and any products containing it are banned for household use so we have to pay a fortune for crap cleaning products that don't work.

Green Party? Be very careful what you wish for.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *otlovefun42Couple  over a year ago

Costa Blanca Spain...

Thinking about it though, the Greens could be the useful idiots of the next election. Very few (if any) Tories or Ukip'ers would jump that way so they will be taking votes from Labour and the Lib Dems.

Hmmm maybe not too bad after all.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

So is there a link to the official Green party 2015 full manifesto?

I can't see anything up-to-date on their website but I'm using the mobile version so I'm not sure if I'm missing links or something.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/01/15 09:21:57]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Because the greens are not a social as the would have you believe. They are ideologically pashed for the supreme ecological agenda.

Which is all well and good until you start forcing it on to people, like taxing people that buy larger cars more.... What about large families that require 7 seaters... Are they going to be disproportionately taxed because they need the larger cars. I've not seen any pledge to increase the incentive to buy a hybrid or electric car.. which would be more to the point from the side of fuel efficiency and lower or no carbon emission cars.

They are socialists only skin deep. Beyond that they are just as capitalist as the other 4 main parties"

I think that's the point though, force people to take a look at the damage their choices are making. Anybody here doesn't agree with a party or it's policies you can contact them direct on your own or start a campaign and get back up. Ask them to consider your ideas if you think they're better. Get involved by doing more than tick a box at election time. I always consider voting a bit like a political version of a popularity contest, because not everyone who votes is going to get the party they wanted and even if you did do you really agree 100% on everything they do?

All political parties very much do have their own agendas that they try to push as law, sometimes they don't discuss things we think are in our interest, or they do so and come to a different conclusion. But without our input they won't know we care or what we want.

Yeah it's hard work, gets easier as you get to know their system and how it works.

Also, that £71 a week will be a standard payment for everyone because we do have an economic system and if you are born into it it's unlikely you'll leave it. Is it fair if anyone is forced to live in an economic society without any money? No it isn't, and it's stressful, it's cruel to even hint that your way of life will entail you have nothing.

I'm guessing, from the info given in that article, that the unemployed will get no more help than they were entitled to before they change to this. But at least cruel sanctions cannot exist. We need to accept that demoralising people is cruel, it's not fair to scare people into thinking they will end up hungry and homeless, it's not fair to actually make them hungry or homeless either. Everyone has basic needs, and if we meet those (as has been more happening over time) then society becomes less violent, the people become more content and peaceful.

_______________________________________

I've lived in poverty all my life, by chance and really by good luck i became wealthy a few years ago. Firstly, i'm not materialistic so it didn't really affect me too much, and it took me two years to leave the 'poverty' mindset because i'd never known anything but poverty, but i now have peace of mind for the first time in my life and it's an incredible feeling, especially compared to going hungry, worrying about bills and feeling stressed about things that shouldn't be stressful. I'm a lot worse off under this government by the way but still doing alright, not paying taxes in protest and they haven't got the staff to do anything about it so their cuts backfired for this government here, either that or they genuinely don't care that i pay them- either way it looks bad. This is why they want access to peoples personal information, so they can do what they want without any hassle and don anything they feel is justified, there's a law in place now where the gov. can access your bank and take out money they claim you owe (whether you owe it or not), don't think that's fair but hey we don't need privacy.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"At the last German election they wanted to legalise incest and lower the age of consent to 14.

A strong green party is a bloody nightmare. You buy a tin of paint here and it's like piss because they've got half of the ingredients banned. Bleach and any products containing it are banned for household use so we have to pay a fortune for crap cleaning products that don't work.

Green Party? Be very careful what you wish for."

Copy and pasting a previous argument into another argument is considered poor quality debating. Maybe elaborate more on what you felt a need to c&p or word it differently if you felt it was a good point but ignored unjustly.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Just had a read of their pdf manifesto

I can agree they have some good ideas but really bad ones. Their proposal to reduce motorway speed limits to 55mph is just

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *arry247Couple  over a year ago

Wakefield

Climate change is natural and mankind will not stop it.

We are at present still coming out of the last Ice Age.

In a few thousand years we will start to slip into a new Ice Age live with it that's what happens.

The effect mankind has on this change is minimal and can safely be ignored.

That is not to say that we should not control pollution for the beefit of health but don't try to scaremonger with dire warnings of rising sea levels due to man's pollution of the planet sea levels have been rising and lowering since the earth was formed.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If you hadn't mentioned that this was the Green Party's manifesto OP, I might have mistaken it for that of the Monster Raving Loony party.

On second thoughts, I don't think even the MRL Party are THAT bonkers!!!!"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

the benefit of marginal parties like the Greens and to a certain extent UKIP is that they can propose some more out there policies as they have little to lose by being mainstream.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"On the growth thing, we have finite piles of resources, (some replenish) so our clamouring for growth year on year just accelorates our consumption...

And in the west most of us is consuming more than we should"

.

Exactly people just don't get the problems with growth or the challenges faced by stopping growth.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I'm wondering how the plan to fund the £71 per person. To potential 30+ million people. That is gonna cost a minimum potential of £2,130,000,000. And that's before they included other welfare top ups to people that either can't work or can't find jobs

It costs something like 10bn more than the current welfare budget in total.

A tiny amount when you consider higher tax for the wealthy and tax-evading corporations.

Just gonna hijack this thread and say I fully support the Green Party and will continue to vote them. I don't see any other party providing us with anything different to what we have now, other than more fear and more censorship. No point being luddites and falling behind developing countries. Green Party are just what everyone else will be saying, in 20 years time, when its too late."

.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The rising sea level is definitely down to the environmental problems that we've caused over the last 50 years or so. Once all that ice melts, the temperatures of the earth will be improperly balanced. You're not looking at 'thousands of years' til the next ice age, you're looking at decades. Maybe a couple centuries. Remember the flooding and crazy storms a couple years back? That's the overflow. It's only going to get worse. While perfectly natural, we have accelerated this process massively.

That said, the hole in our ozone layer is repairing so I'd say we're on the right track. Until America follows suit though there is no hope.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Just had a read of their pdf manifesto

I can agree they have some good ideas but really bad ones. Their proposal to reduce motorway speed limits to 55mph is just "

.

It's the most fuel efficient speed and produces less congestion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Climate change is natural and mankind will not stop it.

We are at present still coming out of the last Ice Age.

In a few thousand years we will start to slip into a new Ice Age live with it that's what happens.

The effect mankind has on this change is minimal and can safely be ignored.

That is not to say that we should not control pollution for the beefit of health but don't try to scaremonger with dire warnings of rising sea levels due to man's pollution of the planet sea levels have been rising and lowering since the earth was formed."

.

No shit Sherlock.

Last time I looked 26,000 climatologist said that according to current scientific data man made carbon is altering the climate and at an alarming rate.

Not one scientist ever has said that climate change doesn't happen naturally.

The evidence is based on man made carbon.

Unless you've done your own research and had that peer reviewed by thousands of other experts, in which case let's hear it!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Climate change is natural and mankind will not stop it.

We are at present still coming out of the last Ice Age.

In a few thousand years we will start to slip into a new Ice Age live with it that's what happens.

The effect mankind has on this change is minimal and can safely be ignored.

That is not to say that we should not control pollution for the beefit of health but don't try to scaremonger with dire warnings of rising sea levels due to man's pollution of the planet sea levels have been rising and lowering since the earth was formed."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

My main question is. If they are banning alcohol advertising, scrapping the standing army, navy etc, scrapping the arms industry.

What are they going to do with all these people who will be out of work?

Both of us would probably be out of a job if the alcohol industry took a hit like that.

Would we be automatically given a job building all these wind turbines

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 21/01/15 11:15:15]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No shit Sherlock.

Last time I looked 26,000 climatologist said that according to current scientific data man made carbon is altering the climate and at an alarming rate.

Not one scientist ever has said that climate change doesn't happen naturally.

The evidence is based on man made carbon.

Unless you've done your own research and had that peer reviewed by thousands of other experts, in which case let's hear it!"

Oh god. Thank you.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

What planet are these politicians on ? Idiots

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hot OP   Couple  over a year ago

North West

In my opinion, the Green Party would be a disaster for this country because so many of their policies require international consensus and action to make them work.

I read somewhere that the annual increase of CO2 emmissions from China over each of the last ten years is more than the entire CO2 output of the UK (or something like that).actually I think it something like.. If the UK reduced all of its CO2 emmissions to zero, the Amount of CO2 saved would be the equivalent of the annual increase in emmissions from China. They are building new airports at the rate of one a month by the way!

Also, If the UK were to stop all its trade tomorrow with China in protest at its emmissions then this would theoretically equate to a 1% reduction in the overall Chinese emmissions.

I am not saying that we should not strive to be more efficient and cleaner but the UK impact on global "pollution" is microscopic.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The ipcc is international.

The Kyoto agreement is international.

The US is the biggest producer of pollution and optated out of lots of sections on agreement.

65% of China's pollution is west derived, that is the pollution is only there to make stuff for the west, it's not their own population creating it.

I made this point to Irene the other day, it's near enough impossible to give the world's current population the living standards we enjoy.

This does not mean in my mind that most of the current problems facing the world require radical solutions.

The banking crises, the debt mountain, climate change, energy policy and population control cannot and will not get fixed with our current capitalist system or politics.

Let's just think about the problems we face with the middle East!, who here doesn't think the problem could not be substantially eased by removing the absolute necessity for oil?.

Could the banking crises not be substantially eased by removing the ever present need for continuous profit gain and expansion of the money supply.

Does anyone actually think the current system will cut 60% from c02 production by 2020!!!! That's five years away before the targets we set were meant to be reached.

You either accept the inevitable doom of our species or you accept our way of life has to alter!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *otlovefun42Couple  over a year ago

Costa Blanca Spain...


"At the last German election they wanted to legalise incest and lower the age of consent to 14.

A strong green party is a bloody nightmare. You buy a tin of paint here and it's like piss because they've got half of the ingredients banned. Bleach and any products containing it are banned for household use so we have to pay a fortune for crap cleaning products that don't work.

Green Party? Be very careful what you wish for.

Copy and pasting a previous argument into another argument is considered poor quality debating. Maybe elaborate more on what you felt a need to c&p or word it differently if you felt it was a good point but ignored unjustly."

Yes to be fair I did use the same comments on another thread (re typed it rather than copy paste though)

However it was Green party policy at the last German election (and the Euro Greens do tend to stick together) so on any Green party related thread or in reply to any Green party comment I think I am fully justified in repeating it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I am not saying that we should not strive to be more efficient and cleaner but the UK impact on global "pollution" is microscopic."

It is but many of the colonies follow our example. If we show the world that things can be different and times are changing, that impact is massive. Before it's too late anyway.

Don't get hooked on the "Green" name and ethos. For me, that's the lowest priority of their regime.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hot OP   Couple  over a year ago

North West


"I am not saying that we should not strive to be more efficient and cleaner but the UK impact on global "pollution" is microscopic.

It is but many of the colonies follow our example. If we show the world that things can be different and times are changing, that impact is massive. Before it's too late anyway.

Don't get hooked on the "Green" name and ethos. For me, that's the lowest priority of their regime."

"Colonies follow our example?"

I am not sure that is correct. The problem we have is that we have a mature, complacent and civilised western world and the developing world striving to achieve the same level.

Cutting emmissions from the UK will be as effective as taking a bucket full of water out of lake windermere and execting the water level to drop.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I am not saying that we should not strive to be more efficient and cleaner but the UK impact on global "pollution" is microscopic.

It is but many of the colonies follow our example. If we show the world that things can be different and times are changing, that impact is massive. Before it's too late anyway.

Don't get hooked on the "Green" name and ethos. For me, that's the lowest priority of their regime."

An admirable approach, but until China and the US agree to things like Kyoto then the rest of the world will argue if they aren't doing it why should we, until the point at which we screw things up so badly we are doomed anyway!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ouple in LancashireCouple  over a year ago

in Lancashire

its truly a dilemma, will never vote Tory, and Labour for me are not my cup of tea at present..

live in an area where the tories could leave half their core voters at home and still get elected..

have voted green before but not sure this time..

heart and head thing..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan  over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

Which is all well and good until you start forcing it on to people, like taxing people that buy larger cars more.... What about large families that require 7 seaters... Are they going to be disproportionately taxed because they need the larger cars. I've not seen any pledge to increase the incentive to buy a hybrid or electric car.. which would be more to the point from the side of fuel efficiency and lower or no carbon emission cars.

"

Ahem... Last time I checked wasn't road tax charged on what comes out at the back... So isn't the solution to mak bigger hybrid or electrics and stick charging points in all major cities and motorway service stations

I don't mind many of their transport policies... Electric buses wouldn't be a problem.. An all electric train network would cost

Also there are the only party to support the renationalises the trains

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

http://policy.greenparty.org.uk/

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Hello Fabio,

unfortunately the people pushing electric transport and the people who have to supply the electricity don't seem to be talking, we have a serious shortfall in generating capacity which could become critical in a couple of years time. There is talk of new generating capacity being built but it takes years to build a base line power station.

More wind turbines the greens will say, but I read a report this morning, on a day of our highest demand due to the cold the wind generated contribution was one percent, despite having an installed capacity of over twenty percent of our generating capacity. It is unreliable.

Alec

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Hello Fabio,

unfortunately the people pushing electric transport and the people who have to supply the electricity don't seem to be talking, we have a serious shortfall in generating capacity which could become critical in a couple of years time. There is talk of new generating capacity being built but it takes years to build a base line power station.

More wind turbines the greens will say, but I read a report this morning, on a day of our highest demand due to the cold the wind generated contribution was one percent, despite having an installed capacity of over twenty percent of our generating capacity. It is unreliable.

Alec

"

.

No one is saying wind turbines are the solution were saying we should build more so when the conditions are right we can get 50-60% generations, with gas fired as a measure to fill in, while we look to bring on hydro, wave, solar and geo.

Nuclear as we now have is definitely a no go but we are curious to look at thorium and fusion, although these would be 20 year measures hence the need to reduce by tax and banning of some stuff for the current levels to be met.

I'll be straight, there are no easy measures to meet c02 cutbacks, no magic wands, no secretly held back technology, it's just a case of cuts were we can and should regardless of whether it's a vote winner, in fact in spite no one likes it, it's the right thing to do in the long run.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oo hot OP   Couple  over a year ago

North West

Doing the right thing in this country is unfortunately very misguided. Particularly when we British assume that everyone else will, of course play by the rules and do the right thing.

There are hundreds of developing countries looking to grab an economic advantage and so pushing the UK it an economic wilderness by punitive taxation on business and high energy tax will certainly benefit some third world countries. Unfortunately, the average Brit wont be too happy being bent over and shafted by the rest of the world in the name of the greater good of the planet.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You don't really need developing countries to sign up to anything just the "west" , there only real market is us.

Half of all their pollution would disappear if they stopped making pound shop shite.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.1093

0