FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Aussie hostage situation
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone listening to the news? " Just read about it....scary. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone listening to the news? " Oh fuck, wished I hadn't read this and then the news, six of my family live and work in that area. Hopefully they were at work and safe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What area is it " Martin Place, city centre, 2 minutes walk uphill of Opera House. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. " Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. " They could have bombs strapped to them were either a wire is pulled r something like a switch to set it off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? " Snipers are very well trained and would not take the shot if their was a risk of collateral damage. Having said that tho these terrorists only have one aim and that is to kill westerners, the hostages are likely to die at their hands so it's worth the risk to make an attempt to take them out. Look at the mearsk hostage situation with capt philips, 3 pirates were taken out simultaneously by 3 snipers from the back of a moving ship. It is possible. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? " So your comment to me who has six family members who live and work there is what? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? So your comment to me who has six family members who live and work there is what? " If your question is to me I was referring to the very post you're replying to................ but if it wasn't, then yes, i agree, there wasn't too much thinking involved!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? So your comment to me who has six family members who live and work there is what? If your question is to me I was referring to the very post you're replying to................ but if it wasn't, then yes, i agree, there wasn't too much thinking involved!! " Thanks, as you used the quote button using my text that's why I asked. ;-0 As I haven't had any calls from my family in Sydney I assume all is good with them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry, I tactically quoted you to enhance the point - but I obviously failed miserably! I know many people who live in & around Sydney too, - hope none of them are in the wrong place at the wrong time." That's okay,just spoke to one of my sisters, all is well with them as she said they have all spoken. Hope your people are good too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does this have anything to do with Sydney University? Grow up & piss off! That was a legitimate question. My younger sister is a student there. You are being a snide and facetious fool as you have obviously read the thread and despite people having concerns for their family threw in a Sydney University comment, which is a term of ridicule on here. Do you actually think anyone believes a word you say?...green arrow by your name will show up. I have no more to say to you as you are highly offensive despite claiming to be innocent. Blocked. " Having read his comments on other threads I've no reason not to believe him. It seems quite plausible to me. You can't bann the phrase 'Sydney University' from the forums, especially when the subject matter is actually about Sydney. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does this have anything to do with Sydney University? Grow up & piss off! That was a legitimate question. My younger sister is a student there. You are being a snide and facetious fool as you have obviously read the thread and despite people having concerns for their family threw in a Sydney University comment, which is a term of ridicule on here. Do you actually think anyone believes a word you say?...green arrow by your name will show up. I have no more to say to you as you are highly offensive despite claiming to be innocent. Blocked. Having read his comments on other threads I've no reason not to believe him. It seems quite plausible to me. You can't bann the phrase 'Sydney University' from the forums, especially when the subject matter is actually about Sydney." Thank you! Thankfully after reading the news (properly without panicking this time), and my dad making a few phone calls, relieved to hear all's fine. Nearly give me a heart attack much? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does this have anything to do with Sydney University? Grow up & piss off! That was a legitimate question. My younger sister is a student there. You are being a snide and facetious fool as you have obviously read the thread and despite people having concerns for their family threw in a Sydney University comment, which is a term of ridicule on here. Do you actually think anyone believes a word you say?...green arrow by your name will show up. I have no more to say to you as you are highly offensive despite claiming to be innocent. Blocked. Having read his comments on other threads I've no reason not to believe him. It seems quite plausible to me. You can't bann the phrase 'Sydney University' from the forums, especially when the subject matter is actually about Sydney." Has anyone actually banned or asked to ban Sydney Uni?, shame the timeline does not show in minutes ( after 1 hour) or the other persons replies would always show 4 or 5 minutes after mine. Please do read the thread about my 6 members of family in Sydney, which I beliive show about 2 hours above the other persons. Enough said! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...nobody else will have family members working, studying or living in a foreign country, right?" Please see TOC and FAQ. I openly stated I have blocked you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...nobody else will have family members working, studying or living in a foreign country, right? Please see TOC and FAQ. I openly stated I have blocked you. " And I am supposed to care about the fact you have blocked me for a nanosecond because...? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? Snipers are very well trained and would not take the shot if their was a risk of collateral damage. Having said that tho these terrorists only have one aim and that is to kill westerners, the hostages are likely to die at their hands so it's worth the risk to make an attempt to take them out. Look at the mearsk hostage situation with capt philips, 3 pirates were taken out simultaneously by 3 snipers from the back of a moving ship. It is possible. " Another reason the snipers may not have taken shots is because shooting through glass is a last resort option only. Sounds crazy but when a high velocity round strikes glass a few things take place. 1) the glass shatters causing injuries to anyone nearby. 2) the bullet "spalls" which means it changes direction and spins wildly and the chance of hitting your intended target is greatly reduced. 3) the bullet has a high chance of breaking up this also means the risk of collateral damage is increased and there's less chance of hitting your intended target. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand why with all the armed officers you can clearly see that they haven't been taken out by a sniper as yet. The footage I'm watching you can see both terrorists walking fairly close to the windows. Why are they trying to negotiate you can't with these people, get snipers in shoot them and get the innocent people out befor they get hurt or it ends badley. Counties are far too soft with people like this. Thanks for your input. What level of collateral damage would you, in England, deem the Australian government justify to their populace, or to me who may possibly have a family member held there is acceptable? Snipers are very well trained and would not take the shot if their was a risk of collateral damage. Having said that tho these terrorists only have one aim and that is to kill westerners, the hostages are likely to die at their hands so it's worth the risk to make an attempt to take them out. Look at the mearsk hostage situation with capt philips, 3 pirates were taken out simultaneously by 3 snipers from the back of a moving ship. It is possible. Another reason the snipers may not have taken shots is because shooting through glass is a last resort option only. Sounds crazy but when a high velocity round strikes glass a few things take place. 1) the glass shatters causing injuries to anyone nearby. 2) the bullet "spalls" which means it changes direction and spins wildly and the chance of hitting your intended target is greatly reduced. 3) the bullet has a high chance of breaking up this also means the risk of collateral damage is increased and there's less chance of hitting your intended target." Oh right I didn't know these facts, you learn something new everyday thank you. As for the guy being aggressive and rude it's good your family are not involved but please think about those families who are indeed involved. I asked a question as to why snipers hadn't done something. I don't think my question deserved such a vile response from you?. Terrorists of what ever form need to be stopped as another poster pointed out there aim is it get as much publicity as possible and kill westerners this is not acceptable. You might not like what I've said however having had a friend killed this year in a terrorist attack my _iews are also very strong. They need stopping with little or no harm to those innocent people that have been involved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"may they all be safe " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...nobody else will have family members working, studying or living in a foreign country, right? Please see TOC and FAQ. I openly stated I have blocked you. " I think we should clear up the blocked rule. It is a rule for people trying to contact people when they are blocked. IE why have you blocked me, unblock me,can tell me why I am blocked etc. Blocking someone doesn't mean that person cant answer peoples posts. they can join in like everyone. I can see why you were wound up, but maybe log off if people are annoying you so much, as the forum summary suggests. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Take the police out of the question. Send in the Aussie sas breach double tap and clear. Go in hard and make an example of him. " think you have seen far too many action movies !! Containment and negotiation is the way forwards, its guaranteed the big boys will be waiting around the corner just in case though. Walk softly .........but carry a big stick. ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Take the police out of the question. Send in the Aussie sas breach double tap and clear. Go in hard and make an example of him. think you have seen far too many action movies !! Containment and negotiation is the way forwards, its guaranteed the big boys will be waiting around the corner just in case though. Walk softly .........but carry a big stick. ! " It's not just about containment and be git into, there's many factors to consider. If you take a critical shot it's not guaranteed to incapacitate a subject. If that happens any coordinated intervention by assault can go horribly wrong for hostages and the intervention. As already mentioned, Spalding can kill those within when a high velocity round penetrates glass which even with modern purpose made rounds, can deflect. The hostage taker was apparently agitated when people escaped and tension will be high. Any assault no matter who it's by, is very likely to lead to the death of innocents so it's a last resort. Joe public can sit and criticise all they like, but trained experts are no doubt looking at every resolution. ..hopefully without bloodshed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"may they all be safe " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Take the police out of the question. Send in the Aussie sas breach double tap and clear. Go in hard and make an example of him. " yes..the aussie branch are trained by our lads.so there will be no fucking about.you have to fight fire with fire sometimes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"may they all be safe " Yep! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does this have anything to do with Sydney University?" They are bound to be in there somewhere nicking pictures. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Another violent sex case it seems from the peaceful nation. What is there problem. If they dont like our way of like there are pleanty of countries that will welcome them" Has there been violent sex involved? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Another violent sex case it seems from the peaceful nation. What is there problem. If they dont like our way of like there are pleanty of countries that will welcome them Has there been violent sex involved? " That one had me a little puzzled! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Another violent sex case it seems from the peaceful nation. What is there problem. If they dont like our way of like there are pleanty of countries that will welcome them Has there been violent sex involved? That one had me a little puzzled!" The whole post had me puzzled. The hostage taker is from Iran isn't he? What is who's problem? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Another violent sex case it seems from the peaceful nation. What is there problem. If they dont like our way of like there are pleanty of countries that will welcome them Has there been violent sex involved? That one had me a little puzzled! The whole post had me puzzled. The hostage taker is from Iran isn't he? What is who's problem? " It cane with Britain First style grammar and spelling, so I drew my own conclusions... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm assuming he meant violent but case but had his mind on other things..... " Or maybe even nut case....damned autocarrot! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm assuming he meant violent but case but had his mind on other things..... Or maybe even nut case....damned autocarrot!" . I see. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Every time I hear about it, I keep on thinking about the Siege of Sidney St of 1911, when a group of terrorists (anarchists in the language of the day) holed up in Sidney St and had a shoot out with the Scots Guards. I sometimes wonder about how much the world has changed in 100 years. " In terms of human behaviour? Not at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Every time I hear about it, I keep on thinking about the Siege of Sidney St of 1911, when a group of terrorists (anarchists in the language of the day) holed up in Sidney St and had a shoot out with the Scots Guards. I sometimes wonder about how much the world has changed in 100 years. In terms of human behaviour? Not at all." The only real change is the weapons | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Another violent sex case it seems from the peaceful nation. What is there problem. If they dont like our way of like there are pleanty of countries that will welcome them Has there been violent sex involved? That one had me a little puzzled! The whole post had me puzzled. The hostage taker is from Iran isn't he? What is who's problem? It cane with Britain First style grammar and spelling, so I drew my own conclusions..." Came, even! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Every time I hear about it, I keep on thinking about the Siege of Sidney St of 1911, when a group of terrorists (anarchists in the language of the day) holed up in Sidney St and had a shoot out with the Scots Guards. I sometimes wonder about how much the world has changed in 100 years. In terms of human behaviour? Not at all. The only real change is the weapons " Not really, he's armed with a shotgun, isn't he? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've just read something rather wonderful on the news related to this. I'm really glad that a number of people have been able to distinguish between the acts of a minority and the majority: Sydney cafe: Australians say to Muslims "I'll ride with you" As a gunman holds people hostage in a cafe in Sydney, thousands of messages of support have been posted online for Muslims in Australia who are afraid of an Islamophobic backlash. The spark was this post on Facebook by Rachael Jacobs, who said she'd seen a woman she presumed was Muslim silently removing her hijab while sitting next to her on the train: "I ran after her at the train station. I said 'put it back on. I'll walk with u'. She started to cry and hugged me for about a minute - then walked off alone'. " I've been reading about this on Twitter. Its restored a little of my faith | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bomb disposal robot thingy in the footage the tv at moment Saying 4 hostages seriously injured so far" Unconfirmed. Also saying those hostages needed CPR. The guy is on bail and apparently has nothing to lose as he is going to prison for a long time - why's he on bail? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Take the police out of the question. Send in the Aussie sas breach double tap and clear. Go in hard and make an example of him. yes..the aussie branch are trained by our lads.so there will be no fucking about.you have to fight fire with fire sometimes" The last thing they need is more terrorists involved! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've just read something rather wonderful on the news related to this. I'm really glad that a number of people have been able to distinguish between the acts of a minority and the majority: Sydney cafe: Australians say to Muslims "I'll ride with you" As a gunman holds people hostage in a cafe in Sydney, thousands of messages of support have been posted online for Muslims in Australia who are afraid of an Islamophobic backlash. The spark was this post on Facebook by Rachael Jacobs, who said she'd seen a woman she presumed was Muslim silently removing her hijab while sitting next to her on the train: "I ran after her at the train station. I said 'put it back on. I'll walk with u'. She started to cry and hugged me for about a minute - then walked off alone'. " Geez Titz, that was was moving! Obviously not from the ozzy equivalent of the kipper party then! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Take the police out of the question. Send in the Aussie sas breach double tap and clear. Go in hard and make an example of him. yes..the aussie branch are trained by our lads.so there will be no fucking about.you have to fight fire with fire sometimes The last thing they need is more terrorists involved! " your back not seen or heard of you for a week or so slagging the Brits off | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Take the police out of the question. Send in the Aussie sas breach double tap and clear. Go in hard and make an example of him. yes..the aussie branch are trained by our lads.so there will be no fucking about.you have to fight fire with fire sometimes The last thing they need is more terrorists involved! your back not seen or heard of you for a week or so slagging the Brits off" You (2?) must have been away for a week, - there's been loads of pommie bashing!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've just read something rather wonderful on the news related to this. I'm really glad that a number of people have been able to distinguish between the acts of a minority and the majority: Sydney cafe: Australians say to Muslims "I'll ride with you" As a gunman holds people hostage in a cafe in Sydney, thousands of messages of support have been posted online for Muslims in Australia who are afraid of an Islamophobic backlash. The spark was this post on Facebook by Rachael Jacobs, who said she'd seen a woman she presumed was Muslim silently removing her hijab while sitting next to her on the train: "I ran after her at the train station. I said 'put it back on. I'll walk with u'. She started to cry and hugged me for about a minute - then walked off alone'. " Very touching. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've just read something rather wonderful on the news related to this. I'm really glad that a number of people have been able to distinguish between the acts of a minority and the majority: Sydney cafe: Australians say to Muslims "I'll ride with you" As a gunman holds people hostage in a cafe in Sydney, thousands of messages of support have been posted online for Muslims in Australia who are afraid of an Islamophobic backlash. The spark was this post on Facebook by Rachael Jacobs, who said she'd seen a woman she presumed was Muslim silently removing her hijab while sitting next to her on the train: "I ran after her at the train station. I said 'put it back on. I'll walk with u'. She started to cry and hugged me for about a minute - then walked off alone'. Very touching." There really is empathy and sane people about in this stupid selfish world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Glad it's over and my thoughts are with those who were hurt or killed." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! " Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? " I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it." But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?" Yes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes." how? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how?" I will always _iew at an act of cowardice.....doesn't take any balls to meet your maker in such an abhorrent an vile way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how?" Because you don't have the courage to look the people you've held hostage andthe families of the people you are responsible for killing in the eye. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how?I will always _iew at an act of cowardice.....doesn't take any balls to meet your maker in such an abhorrent an vile way." Interesting ........ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"its cowardly as fcuk if you wanna make a point go shoot or blow yourself up in the name of your cause leave innocents out of it" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"its cowardly as fcuk if you wanna make a point go shoot or blow yourself up in the name of your cause leave innocents out of it" But that is neither the way the military nor terrorism works, is it! It's always eye for an eye - but the vast majority of deaths are always the innocent!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"we dont go in smoking anyone associated with these cowardly twats. we target them directly and if an innocents get caught up in it, its sad times this cnut hit a coffee shop in downtown Aus ffs. Wtf has Lindt got to do with anything" & we hit a multitude of downtown coffee shops, schools, hospitals etc in downtown Bagdad - but one was labeled terrorism & one collateral damage.............. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"we dont go in smoking anyone associated with these cowardly twats. we target them directly and if an innocents get caught up in it, its sad times this cnut hit a coffee shop in downtown Aus ffs. Wtf has Lindt got to do with anything" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"we dont go in smoking anyone associated with these cowardly twats. we target them directly and if an innocents get caught up in it, its sad times this cnut hit a coffee shop in downtown Aus ffs. Wtf has Lindt got to do with anything & we hit a multitude of downtown coffee shops, schools, hospitals etc in downtown Bagdad - but one was labeled terrorism & one collateral damage.............. " If we wish to draw comparisons and juxtapose, yes there has been collateral damage in conflicts with our country but rightly or wrongly there was some objective. What was today's coffee shop objective other than to cause terror ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? " yeah..he was a shithouse of the first degree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"we dont go in smoking anyone associated with these cowardly twats. we target them directly and if an innocents get caught up in it, its sad times this cnut hit a coffee shop in downtown Aus ffs. Wtf has Lindt got to do with anything & we hit a multitude of downtown coffee shops, schools, hospitals etc in downtown Bagdad - but one was labeled terrorism & one collateral damage.............. If we wish to draw comparisons and juxtapose, yes there has been collateral damage in conflicts with our country but rightly or wrongly there was some objective. What was today's coffee shop objective other than to cause terror ?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? yeah..he was a shithouse of the first degree" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"we dont go in smoking anyone associated with these cowardly twats. we target them directly and if an innocents get caught up in it, its sad times this cnut hit a coffee shop in downtown Aus ffs. Wtf has Lindt got to do with anything & we hit a multitude of downtown coffee shops, schools, hospitals etc in downtown Bagdad - but one was labeled terrorism & one collateral damage.............. If we wish to draw comparisons and juxtapose, yes there has been collateral damage in conflicts with our country but rightly or wrongly there was some objective. What was today's coffee shop objective other than to cause terror ?" I haven't a clue of his objectives, unlike a lot of Aussies, I've never heard of the guy before now - but I'd guess he has a radicalised Muslim issue with the west?????? By the way, was our objective in Iraq to find & destroy the wmd's that were 'evidently' there, by any chance????? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? yeah..he was a shithouse of the first degree" Agreed! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"we dont go in smoking anyone associated with these cowardly twats. we target them directly and if an innocents get caught up in it, its sad times this cnut hit a coffee shop in downtown Aus ffs. Wtf has Lindt got to do with anything & we hit a multitude of downtown coffee shops, schools, hospitals etc in downtown Bagdad - but one was labeled terrorism & one collateral damage.............. If we wish to draw comparisons and juxtapose, yes there has been collateral damage in conflicts with our country but rightly or wrongly there was some objective. What was today's coffee shop objective other than to cause terror ? I haven't a clue of his objectives, unlike a lot of Aussies, I've never heard of the guy before now - but I'd guess he has a radicalised Muslim issue with the west?????? By the way, was our objective in Iraq to find & destroy the wmd's that were 'evidently' there, by any chance?????" Probably that's the official line yes though I imagine there were far more complex and hidden reasons. But you mentioned one being called collateral and one being called terrorism and queried if they were different unless I'm mistaken? I don't think there's any comparison irrespective of the justness of any invasion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how?" Death is an inevitability for us all, it's not scary it happens. Holding innocent men and women hostage at gunpoint is the act of a coward. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how? Death is an inevitability for us all, it's not scary it happens. Holding innocent men and women hostage at gunpoint is the act of a coward. " gee, if that's cowardly when you know it will ultimately cost your own life, then how would you describe someone who pushes a button to send a missile or bomb that causes mass carnage knowing you'll be walking away free? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how? Death is an inevitability for us all, it's not scary it happens. Holding innocent men and women hostage at gunpoint is the act of a coward. gee, if that's cowardly when you know it will ultimately cost your own life, then how would you describe someone who pushes a button to send a missile or bomb that causes mass carnage knowing you'll be walking away free? " We're not talking about that though are we. As usual you're trying to steer a thread to meet your own anti-British anti-western agenda.....we all get it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how? Death is an inevitability for us all, it's not scary it happens. Holding innocent men and women hostage at gunpoint is the act of a coward. gee, if that's cowardly when you know it will ultimately cost your own life, then how would you describe someone who pushes a button to send a missile or bomb that causes mass carnage knowing you'll be walking away free? We're not talking about that though are we. As usual you're trying to steer a thread to meet your own anti-British anti-western agenda.....we all get it." But we just were talking about that very thing!! I'm not anti-western,British,Muslim or whatever, - but I am anti-hypocritical, & there seems to be a multidude of that very thing when it comes to 'terrorism' or most of the world's conflicts, political, religious or otherwise. As they say; 'one guy's terrorist is another's freedom fighter'!. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think this particular case has anything to do with religion or ethnicity or Isis, just another deranged person with a gun looking for attention. People who want to kill as many as possible on a rampage to make a point over an issue,rarely take hostages in coffee shops, these people tend more to be attention seekers which is why I think the police rightly tried talking to him first, of course you can never rely on these people being talked down because their deranged minds work differently to normal ones. " I think myou find the guy who committed this act, claimed to had been tortured | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As they say; 'one guy's terrorist is another's freedom fighter'!." But this chaps intention wasn't to fight anyone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As they say; 'one guy's terrorist is another's freedom fighter'!. But this chaps intention wasn't to fight anyone. " I believe he had a problem with being tortured - I'd guess by western forces but in truth - I don't know anything about this guy. It's always the innocent who pay the highest price, though!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If fire fighters fight fire And crime fighters fight crime... What the hell do freedom fighters fight " Oh yeah, errrrrrrrm, I'll have to think about that one......... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As they say; 'one guy's terrorist is another's freedom fighter'!. But this chaps intention wasn't to fight anyone. I believe he had a problem with being tortured - I'd guess by western forces but in truth - I don't know anything about this guy. It's always the innocent who pay the highest price, though!!" He also had a problem with women judging by his string of convictions for attacks on them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And murdering his wife..... " So just a nutter really not a freedom fighter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And murdering his wife..... So just a nutter really not a freedom fighter. " Which I said previously in the thread ..... . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As they say; 'one guy's terrorist is another's freedom fighter'!. But this chaps intention wasn't to fight anyone. I believe he had a problem with being tortured - I'd guess by western forces but in truth - I don't know anything about this guy. It's always the innocent who pay the highest price, though!!" The guy was an Iranian refugee, autralia took him in and this is how he re-payed them. He also had a long record of criminal convictions from sexual assault to being associated with his wifes murder, and he "claimed" he was tortured whilst serving time in australian prison for those crimes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As they say; 'one guy's terrorist is another's freedom fighter'!. But this chaps intention wasn't to fight anyone. I believe he had a problem with being tortured - I'd guess by western forces but in truth - I don't know anything about this guy. It's always the innocent who pay the highest price, though!! The guy was an Iranian refugee, autralia took him in and this is how he re-payed them. He also had a long record of criminal convictions from sexual assault to being associated with his wifes murder, and he "claimed" he was tortured whilst serving time in australian prison for those crimes. " He sounds like a mental case! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think this particular case has anything to do with religion or ethnicity or Isis, just another deranged person with a gun looking for attention. People who want to kill as many as possible on a rampage to make a point over an issue,rarely take hostages in coffee shops, these people tend more to be attention seekers which is why I think the police rightly tried talking to him first, of course you can never rely on these people being talked down because their deranged minds work differently to normal ones. I think myou find the guy who committed this act, claimed to had been tortured " theres is people who claim to be elvis Presley and jim Morrison but it doesn't mean its true..? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?Yes. how? Death is an inevitability for us all, it's not scary it happens. Holding innocent men and women hostage at gunpoint is the act of a coward. gee, if that's cowardly when you know it will ultimately cost your own life, then how would you describe someone who pushes a button to send a missile or bomb that causes mass carnage knowing you'll be walking away free? We're not talking about that though are we. As usual you're trying to steer a thread to meet your own anti-British anti-western agenda.....we all get it." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This man and all the rest of these mad men and women need took out by the roots they travel all across the world trying to preach hate and change laws just because it offendes them well sorry but governments need to stand up and say if you don't like it fook off out of the country and go back home, no more pussy footing around these fools they need to be put straight or more attacks will happen more and more frequently" Except this case was wholly irrelevant to your already weak case. The man was obviously mentally ill, not a radical Muslim cleric. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This man and all the rest of these mad men and women need took out by the roots they travel all across the world trying to preach hate and change laws just because it offendes them well sorry but governments need to stand up and say if you don't like it fook off out of the country and go back home, no more pussy footing around these fools they need to be put straight or more attacks will happen more and more frequently Except this case was wholly irrelevant to your already weak case. The man was obviously mentally ill, not a radical Muslim cleric." Thank you! Like I said earlier, *anyone* who kills people in the name of *anything* has a screw lose. Full stop. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You have to love forums... Makes the job of spotting the ones you need to keep an eye on so much easier... " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You have to love forums... Makes the job of spotting the ones you need to keep an eye on so much easier... " Oh, the irony... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This man and all the rest of these mad men and women need took out by the roots they travel all across the world trying to preach hate and change laws just because it offendes them well sorry but governments need to stand up and say if you don't like it fook off out of the country and go back home, no more pussy footing around these fools they need to be put straight or more attacks will happen more and more frequently" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" As they say; 'one guy's terrorist is another's freedom fighter'!. But this chaps intention wasn't to fight anyone. I believe he had a problem with being tortured - I'd guess by western forces but in truth - I don't know anything about this guy. It's always the innocent who pay the highest price, though!! The guy was an Iranian refugee, autralia took him in and this is how he re-payed them. He also had a long record of criminal convictions from sexual assault to being associated with his wifes murder, and he "claimed" he was tortured whilst serving time in australian prison for those crimes. " He claimed he was tortured, any excuse! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? " They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book." That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree." I think there are subtle differences. Some have a pathological hatred and quite viably a mental illness and act on their prejudice, whilst a terrorist by definition is striking terror amongst people to persuade the implementation of a political cause. Subtle but they are different. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree." Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon" So you think I live in the dark ages then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon" Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon So you think I live in the dark ages then?" Are you a Muslim who treats women like shit just for being women | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them." Keep blaiming the innocent people. love it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon So you think I live in the dark ages then? Are you a Muslim who treats women like shit just for being women" Are you a christian (or any other belief for that matter) who treats women like shit just for being women? What has religion got to do with that? And for the record, no. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them." Thank you! Not to mention the wars in Checneya, Eritrea, South Sudan and Uganda all involving groups of christians supposedly fighting in the name of their religion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon So you think I live in the dark ages then? Are you a Muslim who treats women like shit just for being women Are you a christian (or any other belief for that matter) who treats women like shit just for being women? What has religion got to do with that? And for the record, no." if you dont know how a lot of Muslim women are treated then , well i dont know Me i cant stand religion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them." exactly, and exactly what a radical few want. These are acts of sick, evil people of all race, faith and ideologies but all with a common theme...no moral compass. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon So you think I live in the dark ages then? Are you a Muslim who treats women like shit just for being women Are you a christian (or any other belief for that matter) who treats women like shit just for being women? What has religion got to do with that? And for the record, no. if you dont know how a lot of Muslim women are treated then , well i dont know Me i cant stand religion" There might be isolated groups of Muslim men who are abusive to women but that's true of any religious background, but I think that's more that they are from the Middle East rather than the fact they are Muslims. As regards women's stance in Islam: I'm guessing you think all Muslim women wear the burqa or some other head covering (they don't) I bet you think all Islamic law is unfair to women and they are trapped in arranged marriages (they don't, even if a marriage is arranged the woman does not have to marry a man she does not want to and shariah law allows a woman to get a divorce anytime she wants-which is something western women didn't get until the twentieth century) I bet you think all Muslims come from the Middle East (they don't-I'm not for one) And so on ad infinitum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. Keep blaiming the innocent people. love it" Blaming the innocent ...That does not even make sense. If you wish to debate, at least explain your points rather than resorting to some straw man argument. By deciding what someone is like solely through their religious (or otherwise) beliefs displays extreme ignorance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. exactly, and exactly what a radical few want. These are acts of sick, evil people of all race, faith and ideologies but all with a common theme...no moral compass." It particularly makes no sense when you have Christians and Muslims (and Jews) fighting, when they all worship the same God (the Muslim Allah is the same god as the Christian Jehovah and the Jewish Yahweh.). Ethnic and nationalist differences are often the reason for these conflicts. Religion is just used as an excuse. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. Keep blaiming the innocent people. love it" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. Keep blaiming the innocent people. love it " Excellent argument. - your use of five "thumbs up" has really persuaded me as to the strength of that post. I will now sit and reconsider my position in the light of such compelling argument | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. Keep blaiming the innocent people. love it Excellent argument. - your use of five "thumbs up" has really persuaded me as to the strength of that post. I will now sit and reconsider my position in the light of such compelling argument " Well done! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. Thank you! Not to mention the wars in Checneya, Eritrea, South Sudan and Uganda all involving groups of christians supposedly fighting in the name of their religion." George bush and tony blair called their wars on muslims countries starting from Soudan, then Afganistan then Iraq "Crusades" which killed millions and the killing is just part of the damage those wars did and still do. They needed a boogie man to invade those countries and more and they made Benladen and Saddam as an excuse at the time. Its not a secret anymore that both those men are CIA assets. Now adays the boogie is ISIS. ISIS is recruiting easily youngsters with the help of the west financial miltarily and even Their wooded moujahidin are trwated in Israelian hospitals. With the help of government puppets like Saudi Arabia ect. The western media then blame it all in Islam which brings the feelongs of hatred deeper and recruiting easier. Makes eestern muslim citizens feel dissociated from the countries they once dreamed to be part of, believing in freedom of religion and speach and equality. Values that are claimed in the west but only applied when it suits the politicians. The real cause of all this mess is western greed and endless historical violence against the worlds nations to expand the empire. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You have to love forums... Makes the job of spotting the ones you need to keep an eye on so much easier... Oh, the irony..." Oh, the double irony! The hypocrisy was hilarious!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them. Thank you! Not to mention the wars in Checneya, Eritrea, South Sudan and Uganda all involving groups of christians supposedly fighting in the name of their religion." Oh, & apart from all the above & the mass slaughter of the native north Americans, South Americans, Central Americans, Australasians, Africans & Indians, - what have the Christians ever done to anyone, eh? Tut tut!! .....more so the religion of wealth & greed though, I have to admit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it?" It is if you believe you'll be going somewhere better at the end. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A disgusting, cowardly prick actually! Disgusting radicalised prick maybe, - but cowardly???? I'd agree he was cowardly. threatening innocent men and women having a coffee before work is hardly an act of bravery is it. But knowing that you'll ultimately be killed is hardly cowardly, is it? It is if you believe you'll be going somewhere better at the end." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why is it if someone kills people today in the name of christianity, like Anders Brievik; he is a nutcase for doing so, but if someone kills people in the name of Islam, they're a terrorist? They are all terrorist nutcases in my book. That's exactly my point and I absolutely agree. Very rarely do christians kill in the name of religeon. Islam is a way of life and no other way is acceptable to most. The men live in the dark ages and are causing harm all over the world. Be afraid people this will not go away soon Guess you've never heard of the crusades ? Or the Bosnian war? Or indeed the many atrocities right here in Northern Ireland? All involved Christians murdering in the name of religion. Tarring all Muslims with the "fundamentalist" stick is a sure way of encouraging attacks on innocent people or at least tacitly condoning them." I think to bring the action of the Crusades into this, actions committed more than half a millennium ago, and claim that is an example of current Christian behaviour is really nonsensical. And if you really think the troubles in N.Ireland was a struggle between Catholics and Protestants then you've clearly not spent much time looking into it. I think your comments about Christians are about as correct and helpful as some of the more ignorant comments made further up the thread about Muslims and Islam. Which is a shame because your final point about not tarring all Muslims with the same brush is a good and correct one but unfortunately completely lost by your own hypocritical act of tarring all Christians with the same brush. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |