FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Cannibalism in Wales
Cannibalism in Wales
Jump to: Newest in thread
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-29947935 | |||
| |||
 | |||
  | |||
"Why is it strange? "Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad.. | |||
| |||
"Why is it strange? "The crappy BBC news was possibly not the best link to use, they wouldn't want to offend anyone would they? http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/dead-suspected-murderer-eats-woman-s-face-Argoed/story-24329901-detail/story.html | |||
"Why is it strange?
Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad.."You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised  | |||
"Why is it strange?
The crappy BBC news was possibly not the best link to use, they wouldn't want to offend anyone would they?
http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/dead-suspected-murderer-eats-woman-s-face-Argoed/story-24329901-detail/story.html
"Fuck me, that is vile | |||
"Why is it strange?
The crappy BBC news was possibly not the best link to use, they wouldn't want to offend anyone would they?
http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/dead-suspected-murderer-eats-woman-s-face-Argoed/story-24329901-detail/story.html
Fuck me"Your place or mine?  | |||
"Why is it strange?
Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad..
You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised "In my line of work I've heard it all...I guess nothing shocks me anymore i just find it all incredibly sad for the victim. | |||
" You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised "Me too | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine? "Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish  | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish "There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour"They'd have to be speed boats. | |||
| |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour
They'd have to be speed boats. "Oi, sod off, I am flirting with me Ruggers  | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour
They'd have to be speed boats.
Oi, sod off, I am flirting with me Ruggers "Isn't there a seperate thread for that. | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour"Don't listen to him, the bay is rough this morning, there are no boats coming in...honestly the lengths some guys will go to...lol | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour
They'd have to be speed boats. "
Back to the subject at hand though - very sad for the victim, obviously. But if agree very strange - it's not something you read about regularly.
When I become a zombie (assuming the zombie apocalypse happens and my survival plan goes tits up!) I'd like to think I'd still be a breast/rump kind of zombie.
A | |||
"Why is it strange?
Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad..
You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised
In my line of work I've heard it all...I guess nothing shocks me anymore i just find it all incredibly sad for the victim. "The guy was found eating the women's face! | |||
| |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour
Don't listen to him, the bay is rough this morning, there are no boats coming in...honestly the lengths some guys will go to...lol"Damn, one of those they will say anything to get what they want moments....and heres me nearly fell for it !! | |||
"Why is it strange?
The crappy BBC news was possibly not the best link to use, they wouldn't want to offend anyone would they?
http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/dead-suspected-murderer-eats-woman-s-face-Argoed/story-24329901-detail/story.html
Fuck me, that is vile"Not as vile as some of the sights I've seen on here, if I'm perfectly frank, & not as strange as some of the requests my wife gets from "apparantly" genuine, easy going people.  | |||
"Why is it strange?
Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad..
You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised
In my line of work I've heard it all...I guess nothing shocks me anymore i just find it all incredibly sad for the victim.
The guy was found eating the women's face!"I still don't find it strange like I said I've met a lot of very nasty people nothing shocks me anymore | |||
" You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised
Me too "Me an all!! | |||
| |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour
Don't listen to him, the bay is rough this morning, there are no boats coming in...honestly the lengths some guys will go to...lol"Paignton is always rougher than Teignmouth | |||
" Fuck me, that is vile Not as vile as some of the sights I've seen on here, "Bloody hell you need to report those pics | |||
| |||
" Fuck me, that is vile Not as vile as some of the sights I've seen on here,
Bloody hell you need to report those pics "Oh ruggers you are in form today lol that was funny | |||
"Yeah this bloke had been released from prison 2 weeks previously after serving a 5 1/2 year sentence on a violent attack on his ex Mrs...they put him in the hotel he met the 22 year old victim and took her back to hotel where he killed her ate her face and eyeball " Ewwww. Eyeballs?!?! Wheres the vomiting icon? | |||
| |||
| |||
"Yeah this bloke had been released from prison 2 weeks previously after serving a 5 1/2 year sentence on a violent attack on his ex Mrs...they put him in the hotel he met the 22 year old victim and took her back to hotel where he killed her ate her face and eyeball Ewwww. Eyeballs?!?! Wheres the vomiting icon?" | |||
"I guess the austerity measures must be really biting hard in Wales." The cannibal's name was Austerity Measures... these Welsh names are weird | |||
"Read the second link Ben, it is more graphic " I wouldn't want to read that while eating my cornflakes lol | |||
"Read the second link Ben, it is more graphic " I dont need to, Cheeky is drip feeding my box with it | |||
"Read the second link Ben, it is more graphic I wouldn't want to read that while eating my cornflakes lol " I did like a lemon...the sugar puffs are now in the dog. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Someone saying "why is it strange" is strange in itself "Possibly but like I said previously I have been privy to some horrendous stuff in my time and yes maybe me not finding it strange is strange in itself but I guess I look and it differently but also have to be mindful of how others perceive it to be. | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour
They'd have to be speed boats. " | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Maybe he was making his way through the football league Liverpool Hartlepool Arsenal " Cockermouth. | |||
"Maybe he was making his way through the football league Liverpool Hartlepool Arsenal Cockermouth. " Scunthorpe | |||
"Maybe he was making his way through the football league Liverpool Hartlepool Arsenal Cockermouth. Scunthorpe "Little Hampton. | |||
| |||
"When the police raided Jeffrey Dahmer's flat all they found amongst the half eaten human remains was a bottle of Tabasco sauce. Apparently Caucasian people taste of pork. Hence our nickname in Papa New Guinea ; The Long Pigs. Although I suspect this case in Wales was some kind of perverse sexual act rather than the attacker being forced into it through starvation. " Dahmer did,nt last very long after his Crimes while he was carrying out tasks Given to him in jail On this occasion Cleaning out the toilet/washroom area Another Inmate waited his chance and Buryed a baseball bat or tryed to In Geoffrey dahmers skull the end of a killer by a killer.. | |||
| |||
"Sounds like the guy took her literally when she told him to eat her pussy" Are you trying to say the woman had a face like a fanny? | |||
"When the police raided Jeffrey Dahmer's flat all they found amongst the half eaten human remains was a bottle of Tabasco sauce. Apparently Caucasian people taste of pork. Hence our nickname in Papa New Guinea ; The Long Pigs. Although I suspect this case in Wales was some kind of perverse sexual act rather than the attacker being forced into it through starvation. " None of the above. He was just off his head on . Say no to drugs | |||
"When the police raided Jeffrey Dahmer's flat all they found amongst the half eaten human remains was a bottle of Tabasco sauce. Apparently Caucasian people taste of pork. Hence our nickname in Papa New Guinea ; The Long Pigs. Although I suspect this case in Wales was some kind of perverse sexual act rather than the attacker being forced into it through starvation. None of the above. He was just off his head on . Say no to drugs" I wonder if it was diet or full fat? | |||
| |||
"None of the above. He was just off his head on . Say no to drugs I wonder if it was diet or full fat? "Full fat coca-cola?  | |||
"None of the above. He was just off his head on . Say no to drugs I wonder if it was diet or full fat?
Full fat coca-cola? "Oh never mind the moment is lost my dear shag | |||
"I wonder what seasoning he used? " Dill probably goes nicely with eyeballs | |||
"None of the above. He was just off his head on . Say no to drugs I wonder if it was diet or full fat?
Full fat coca-cola?
Oh never mind the moment is lost my dear shag "I'm your dear shag?? Lol I didn't know you cared  | |||
| |||
 | |||
"This has the be one of the strangest news stories I have seen for a while!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-29947935"only caught a bit on the radio news shocking story................ sad sad case all round by the sound of things. | |||
| |||
"We aint all weirdo's, I am, but 'Legs' is normal plus a few others are too" Oh waw, someone thinks I'm normal. Diolch  | |||
"We aint all weirdo's, I am, but 'Legs' is normal plus a few others are too Oh waw, someone thinks I'm normal. Diolch "Yeah, but by his admission he is a weirdo | |||
"We aint all weirdo's, I am, but 'Legs' is normal plus a few others are too Oh waw, someone thinks I'm normal. Diolch
Yeah, but by his admission he is a weirdo "OI let me have my moment | |||
"We aint all weirdo's, I am, but 'Legs' is normal plus a few others are too Oh waw, someone thinks I'm normal. Diolch
Yeah, but by his admission he is a weirdo "The nicest of all weirdo's | |||
| |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. "Thats because he was the bad guy, its tragic for his and her family. | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. "He ate a poor girls face and eyes ffs and officers couldn't get him off her....what did you expect them to do tap him on the shoulder and say sir do you mind coming with us...it took 5 officers to get him off her. They assessed the situation with the second they had to react...we don't know cause of death it might of not of being tasered | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He ate a poor girls face and eyes ffs and officers couldn't get him off her....what did you expect them to do tap him on the shoulder and say sir do you mind coming with us...it took 5 officers to get him off her. They assessed the situation with the second they had to react...we don't know cause of death it might of not of being tasered "At that point they didn't know if she was alive or dead and as the victim she was their priority. So they tasered him to get control of him and get to her. If they had been able to save her would people be focusing on his death? | |||
| |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. "If you saw someone attacking a human being or even a helpless animal in this way would you honestly think "ooh please dont hurt the misunderstood person"? Whilst I do not agree with tasers, in this instance I would have condoned any means of getting him off the victim. | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. "I know, that poor poor man... I would have given him a heartburn tablet and wished him well | |||
| |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. " Sometimes words fail me!! | |||
| |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. "In the hierarchy of things that are tragic about this story, for me that's considerably lower down than the fact a 22 year old woman has been murdered in a horrific crime. | |||
"Why is it strange?
Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad..
You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised
In my line of work I've heard it all...I guess nothing shocks me anymore i just find it all incredibly sad for the victim.
The guy was found eating the women's face!
I still don't find it strange like I said I've met a lot of very nasty people nothing shocks me anymore "I have worked frontline in the public sector for many years - it is a shocking story. Whilst murder is sadly rather commonplace, cannabilism is not | |||
| |||
"Oh, i see. The dangers of giving trigger-happy pigs a taser don`t matter in this case because of the seriousness of the crime. I guess we can bury the issue until somebody gets tasered for stealing a pork pie, or a blind man gets tasered cos they thought his white cane was a machete...oh, er, wait a minute... http://www.theguardian.com/world/tasers" the first person to arrive was a Police Woman, she has more guts than me.... | |||
"Why is it strange?
Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad..
You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised
In my line of work I've heard it all...I guess nothing shocks me anymore i just find it all incredibly sad for the victim.
The guy was found eating the women's face!
I still don't find it strange like I said I've met a lot of very nasty people nothing shocks me anymore "Well it doesn't chock me either, but it's definitely coming from leftfield. I'd say it is both sad and quite strange. | |||
"Oh, i see. The dangers of giving trigger-happy pigs a taser don`t matter in this case because of the seriousness of the crime. I guess we can bury the issue until somebody gets tasered for stealing a pork pie, or a blind man gets tasered cos they thought his white cane was a machete...oh, er, wait a minute... http://www.theguardian.com/world/tasers" Your question was why is no one focusing on the taser death. If you believe there are widespread problems with taser use (which many do - but not me, I think they've generally been pretty isolated so far) then a frenzied murder isn't going to be the case that's going to spread that message. | |||
"Oh, i see. The dangers of giving trigger-happy pigs a taser don`t matter in this case because of the seriousness of the crime. I guess we can bury the issue until somebody gets tasered for stealing a pork pie, or a blind man gets tasered cos they thought his white cane was a machete...oh, er, wait a minute... http://www.theguardian.com/world/tasers" He hadn't stolen a pork pie, he had killed an innocent lady and was eating her face!!!! It's not mistaken identity is it, jeeeeez | |||
"Sounds like the guy took her literally when she told him to eat her pussy Are you trying to say the woman had a face like a fanny? " Absolutely not. Such an appalling turn of events in all seriousness, but given the nature of this site.... | |||
| |||
| |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. "He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life. | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered. "What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished? | |||
"Sounds like the guy took her literally when she told him to eat her pussy Are you trying to say the woman had a face like a fanny? Absolutely not. Such an appalling turn of events in all seriousness, but given the nature of this site.... " I was just joking sorry...bad joke | |||
" Ben's woeful attempt at flirting = hysterics at the Polks clever 'speed boat' comment " | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life."I'm not normally one for extreme violence, but in this instance I would have hoped that if he did survive his lovely inmates at her majesty's pleasure would have dealt their own form of justice, so our taxes weren't spent on paying for his jail cell. Horrific | |||
| |||
| |||
"Why is it strange?
Some woman is murdered by her partner in temporary accommodation and then there is cannablism and he is shot and taserd by police and later dies. I wouldn't call the story strange Id call it more of sad..
You dont find anything strange about that? I must have led a more sheltered life than I realised
In my line of work I've heard it all...I guess nothing shocks me anymore i just find it all incredibly sad for the victim.
The guy was found eating the women's face!
I still don't find it strange like I said I've met a lot of very nasty people nothing shocks me anymore "I have known some very violent people over the years but eating someones face beats all that I've seen...police in other countries would have just shot the guy. Talk about last supper... | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?" | |||
" Fuck me Your place or mine?
Yours has a better _iew so lets use yours....it will come in handy for something to look at over your shoulder if you are rubbish
There's no ifs about about it. I am a shit shag. I'll do you doggy style, so you can watch the boats coming in to harbour
They'd have to be speed boats. " | |||
"Sounds like the guy took her literally when she told him to eat her pussy Are you trying to say the woman had a face like a fanny? " well its been known for miss hot to call me cunt face, ,,,,,, whilst she is sitting on it of course, lol | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life."whether he deserved it or not, the police killed him, & should be held accountable, whether we agree or not there is no death penalty in the uk, he would have served life behind bars for her death, but no doubt the copper that killed him will walk away scot free, hence we have a killer on the streets, & in uniform no less, rules for one, rules for another, | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life.
whether he deserved it or not, the police killed him, & should be held accountable, whether we agree or not there is no death penalty in the uk, he would have served life behind bars for her death, but no doubt the copper that killed him will walk away scot free, hence we have a killer on the streets, & in uniform no less, rules for one, rules for another, "You're inferring the policeman intended to kill him? Thumbs up from me for using the taser. Or a brick to the back of his head. They had to get him off the victim. | |||
| |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life.
whether he deserved it or not, the police killed him, & should be held accountable, whether we agree or not there is no death penalty in the uk, he would have served life behind bars for her death, but no doubt the copper that killed him will walk away scot free, hence we have a killer on the streets, & in uniform no less, rules for one, rules for another, "Rules for everyone: don't be a murderer. The police officer that killed him is not a murderer. | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life.
whether he deserved it or not, the police killed him, & should be held accountable, whether we agree or not there is no death penalty in the uk, he would have served life behind bars for her death, but no doubt the copper that killed him will walk away scot free, hence we have a killer on the streets, & in uniform no less, rules for one, rules for another,
Rules for everyone: don't be a murderer. The police officer that killed him is not a murderer. "murder or manslaughter its still illegal, if you have a justice system it has to work for all, I`m not saying the nasty psycho that did this didn`t deserve justice, but remember he has parents, & I`m sure they are grieveing too, let alone having to suffer hate campaigns, although it wasn`t their fault he turned out that way, | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life.
whether he deserved it or not, the police killed him, & should be held accountable, whether we agree or not there is no death penalty in the uk, he would have served life behind bars for her death, but no doubt the copper that killed him will walk away scot free, hence we have a killer on the streets, & in uniform no less, rules for one, rules for another,
Rules for everyone: don't be a murderer. The police officer that killed him is not a murderer.
murder or manslaughter its still illegal, if you have a justice system it has to work for all, I`m not saying the nasty psycho that did this didn`t deserve justice, but remember he has parents, & I`m sure they are grieveing too, let alone having to suffer hate campaigns, although it wasn`t their fault he turned out that way, "I feel for his parents and family and hope they don't suffer any hate campaigns or backlash. I also feel for the police officers who had to go to that horrific scene and try to deal with the situation, and don't think being branded a "killer walking the streets" is probably going to help them either. | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished? "Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law. | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?
Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law. "They did | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?
Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law. "So if they have to protect all but one is busy eating thr face of a second who could still be alive do you let the first one carry on to protect him? Or do you attempt to protect the injured by using legal means to get the eater to let her go? Yes they have taken an oath to protect all but sometimes that involves difficult decisions. Five officers were involved in trying to get him to let her go and after physical means didn't work they used a taser. What about her right to be protected? | |||
"Oh, i see. The dangers of giving trigger-happy pigs a taser don`t matter in this case because of the seriousness of the crime. I guess we can bury the issue until somebody gets tasered for stealing a pork pie, or a blind man gets tasered cos they thought his white cane was a machete...oh, er, wait a minute... http://www.theguardian.com/world/tasers" exactly | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?
Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law.
So if they have to protect all but one is busy eating thr face of a second who could still be alive do you let the first one carry on to protect him? Or do you attempt to protect the injured by using legal means to get the eater to let her go?
Yes they have taken an oath to protect all but sometimes that involves difficult decisions. Five officers were involved in trying to get him to let her go and after physical means didn't work they used a taser.
What about her right to be protected?"What about everyone's rights? Seems it doesn't matter to anyone in power, so why the outcry on this, yes it's bad but so is terrorism, where lots of innocents including children, who didn't even know the perpetrator or agree to go home with him, but are innocently shopping or going about their business, have their lives taken... But the terrorists are kept by our tax payers and can't even be deported to face the music, then the tax payers pay hundreds of thousands for appeal after appeal so the fuckers can stay here claiming benefits to pay for their 2k a month rented accommodation, school their kids in terrorism & recruit more suicide bombers, but you all think this case is so bad, it is bad, but there is much worse going on every day right under your noses, so let's move on & thank your lucky stars you are able to log into this site, smile & enjoy the reason you joined,,,,,, swing people,,,, swing ?? | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
He got what he deserved, and if he had survived i hope he'd have been sent to prison for the rest of his life.
whether he deserved it or not, the police killed him, & should be held accountable, whether we agree or not there is no death penalty in the uk, he would have served life behind bars for her death, but no doubt the copper that killed him will walk away scot free, hence we have a killer on the streets, & in uniform no less, rules for one, rules for another,
You're inferring the policeman intended to kill him?
Thumbs up from me for using the taser. Or a brick to the back of his head. They had to get him off the victim. "Damn right. The way liberals bleat on about criminals rights make me despair. I wish some of these people had to walk into a situation like that, most likely making a split second decision to be branded a killer/murderer walking free? Bullshit. Get real | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?
Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law. "Once again I really despair. If someone was eating your face or a family members would you really want the police, in fact anyone, to hesitate taking the piece of scum out? Really ? | |||
| |||
"It just goes to show the welsh will eat owt" lol | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?
Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law.
Once again I really despair. If someone was eating your face or a family members would you really want the police, in fact anyone, to hesitate taking the piece of scum out? Really ?"The law is the law, fact! | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?
Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law.
Once again I really despair. If someone was eating your face or a family members would you really want the police, in fact anyone, to hesitate taking the piece of scum out? Really ?
The law is the law, fact! "OK no problem. That's your opinion and we can all have one. Ever heard the saying "the law is an ass" ...........  | |||
"Everybody is focusing on the cannibalism claim, but not on the fact that yet another person has died from being tasered.
What did you expect the police to do? Wait until he had finished?
Do thier job, that's what is expected of them, they take an oath, to protect "all" as public servants in common law.
Once again I really despair. If someone was eating your face or a family members would you really want the police, in fact anyone, to hesitate taking the piece of scum out? Really ?
The law is the law, fact! "And the officers involved acted lawfully. | |||
| |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous" I agree completely, to taser some old bloke over parking was wrong. Unless he was violent or armed. Then age doesn't matter. But someone eating the face off another human being, now that's damn wrong and probably deserved a taser used on him .......its not like he was innocently flower pressing or simply looking "a bit dodgy" | |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous" Exactly, well put, and to think they were considering giving the police guns, heaven help us then ?? | |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous I agree completely, to taser some old bloke over parking was wrong. Unless he was violent or armed. Then age doesn't matter. But someone eating the face off another human being, now that's damn wrong and probably deserved a taser used on him .......its not like he was innocently flower pressing or simply looking "a bit dodgy" "This is where people get confused in the law, it isn't the crime that determines when & where tasers are used, it is the guidelines of law, gone are the days of henchmen and the kkk, if punishments were left to half on here, we'd be on par with the most barbaric regions of the world, ie:- chopping fingers off for shop lifting, stoning to death for adultery, yes there's one for you,,,, adultery,,,,, be a few less members on here is my guess, Don't throw stones in glass houses, | |||
"It just goes to show the welsh will eat owt" You scare me | |||
" This is where people get confused in the law, it isn't the crime that determines when & where tasers are used, it is the guidelines of law, gone are the days of henchmen and the kkk, if punishments were left to half on here, we'd be on par with the most barbaric regions of the world, ie:- chopping fingers off for shop lifting, stoning to death for adultery, yes there's one for you,,,, adultery,,,,, be a few less members on here is my guess, Don't throw stones in glass houses, " I think you are maybe missing the point of some.....the police were in a difficult situation and had to act quickly, I wouldn't want their job and the decisions they sometimes have to make, but if Taser was the only way to get this man controlled then that's what it takes. | |||
| |||
" This is where people get confused in the law, it isn't the crime that determines when & where tasers are used, it is the guidelines of law, gone are the days of henchmen and the kkk, if punishments were left to half on here, we'd be on par with the most barbaric regions of the world, ie:- chopping fingers off for shop lifting, stoning to death for adultery, yes there's one for you,,,, adultery,,,,, be a few less members on here is my guess, Don't throw stones in glass houses, I think you are maybe missing the point of some.....the police were in a difficult situation and had to act quickly, I wouldn't want their job and the decisions they sometimes have to make, but if Taser was the only way to get this man controlled then that's what it takes." That may be so & be that as it may, but those who seem to be joyous about the fact that the police killed him & that he deserved it are clearly dillusional about the law & the powers that the police hold ?? | |||
| |||
" This is where people get confused in the law, it isn't the crime that determines when & where tasers are used, it is the guidelines of law, gone are the days of henchmen and the kkk, if punishments were left to half on here, we'd be on par with the most barbaric regions of the world, ie:- chopping fingers off for shop lifting, stoning to death for adultery, yes there's one for you,,,, adultery,,,,, be a few less members on here is my guess, Don't throw stones in glass houses, I think you are maybe missing the point of some.....the police were in a difficult situation and had to act quickly, I wouldn't want their job and the decisions they sometimes have to make, but if Taser was the only way to get this man controlled then that's what it takes. That may be so & be that as it may, but those who seem to be joyous about the fact that the police killed him & that he deserved it are clearly dillusional about the law & the powers that the police hold ??" I am no lover of the police, but they used the Tazer to disable him, they never used it to kill him. You are making it sound like an execution. It does worry me with some of the stories surrounding the police use o Tazers. That one where the guy had doused himself and they Tazered him, only for him to catch fire was ludicrous. There was a crazy story in the paper the other day about a copper who was visiting a school and took a 'dummy' pepper spray can to show the kids. Only he took a real can and pepper sprayed the class! I am glad the police are not all armed, that would really worry me. | |||
| |||
| |||
" This is where people get confused in the law, it isn't the crime that determines when & where tasers are used, it is the guidelines of law, gone are the days of henchmen and the kkk, if punishments were left to half on here, we'd be on par with the most barbaric regions of the world, ie:- chopping fingers off for shop lifting, stoning to death for adultery, yes there's one for you,,,, adultery,,,,, be a few less members on here is my guess, Don't throw stones in glass houses, I think you are maybe missing the point of some.....the police were in a difficult situation and had to act quickly, I wouldn't want their job and the decisions they sometimes have to make, but if Taser was the only way to get this man controlled then that's what it takes. That may be so & be that as it may, but those who seem to be joyous about the fact that the police killed him & that he deserved it are clearly dillusional about the law & the powers that the police hold ??" I am guessing they used it correctly, if not once the enquiry is over it will all come out. | |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous" The police did use judgement based on what they found when they entered that room and found the guy attacking the girl, they made a split second decision to use a taser to gain control over the attacker and i think the use of the taser was fully justified in this instance considering what they were confronted with. Also the police did not intend to kill the guy, it was not an execution, the taser was used to gain control of the situation and the guy died from it, when he became unresponsive the police and medics on the scene tried to revive him but it did'nt work. If the police wanted him dead then why would they try to revive him? Many criminals in todays society carry guns while the majority of our police do not (bar the armed response units). I think having a taser is the next best thing the police can carry to defend themselves or gain control of difficult situations, instead of actually being issued with guns. The police do a difficult, dangerous job and should be given the latest best protective equipment and tech weapons to enable them to do their job safely and protect law abiding citizens. This cannibal killer was not a law abiding citizen, he was a murderer who was caught in the act. | |||
"I hope he suffered before he died. One less monster in the world. My hat goes off to the police. Amazed that a few ppl on the thread are making jokes about the sad situation. "Jokes are no worse than your attitude | |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous The police did use judgement based on what they found when they entered that room and found the guy attacking the girl, they made a split second decision to use a taser to gain control over the attacker and i think the use of the taser was fully justified in this instance considering what they were confronted with. Also the police did not intend to kill the guy, it was not an execution, the taser was used to gain control of the situation and the guy died from it, when he became unresponsive the police and medics on the scene tried to revive him but it did'nt work. If the police wanted him dead then why would they try to revive him? Many criminals in todays society carry guns while the majority of our police do not (bar the armed response units). I think having a taser is the next best thing the police can carry to defend themselves or gain control of difficult situations, instead of actually being issued with guns. The police do a difficult, dangerous job and should be given the latest best protective equipment and tech weapons to enable them to do their job safely and protect law abiding citizens. This cannibal killer was not a law abiding citizen, he was a murderer who was caught in the act. " Someone else who knows nothing of a police officers oath, no mention of protecting law abiding citizens, or being a public servant to law abiding citizens, ignorance is no excuse for the law, you should read up on common law, educate your narrow minds before getting into debates you know nothing about, no matter what our _iews, the police take an oath, that is their job, not to make their own minds up as they go, | |||
| |||
"I'm guessing if the police were not armed with tasers they would have had to have used other methods to get him off the victim. Maybe smashing him over the head with a truncheon. " How primitive,,,, ?? | |||
"I'm guessing if the police were not armed with tasers they would have had to have used other methods to get him off the victim. Maybe smashing him over the head with a truncheon. How primitive,,,, ??" Why? | |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous The police did use judgement based on what they found when they entered that room and found the guy attacking the girl, they made a split second decision to use a taser to gain control over the attacker and i think the use of the taser was fully justified in this instance considering what they were confronted with. Also the police did not intend to kill the guy, it was not an execution, the taser was used to gain control of the situation and the guy died from it, when he became unresponsive the police and medics on the scene tried to revive him but it did'nt work. If the police wanted him dead then why would they try to revive him? Many criminals in todays society carry guns while the majority of our police do not (bar the armed response units). I think having a taser is the next best thing the police can carry to defend themselves or gain control of difficult situations, instead of actually being issued with guns. The police do a difficult, dangerous job and should be given the latest best protective equipment and tech weapons to enable them to do their job safely and protect law abiding citizens. This cannibal killer was not a law abiding citizen, he was a murderer who was caught in the act. Someone else who knows nothing of a police officers oath, no mention of protecting law abiding citizens, or being a public servant to law abiding citizens, ignorance is no excuse for the law, you should read up on common law, educate your narrow minds before getting into debates you know nothing about, no matter what our _iews, the police take an oath, that is their job, not to make their own minds up as they go, " I do know the police officers oath, and they were trying to save/protect the girl who was being attacked first and foremost as she was the victim of this crime.....he was the criminal in this instance. The police did have a duty of care to protect him while in their custody, i read up on the case and after he was tasered so they could control him he was arrested and became unresponsive. Upon becoming unresponsive the police and medics tried to revive him. | |||
"I'm guessing if the police were not armed with tasers they would have had to have used other methods to get him off the victim. Maybe smashing him over the head with a truncheon. How primitive,,,, ??" Yes the truncheon is primitive , maybe that's why they have moved on to the taser. But how would you suggest they got the attacker off of the victim. By asking him nicely , or writing him a note ? | |||
"I'm guessing if the police were not armed with tasers they would have had to have used other methods to get him off the victim. Maybe smashing him over the head with a truncheon. How primitive,,,, ??" What would you suggest?? Give him a cuddle? | |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous The police did use judgement based on what they found when they entered that room and found the guy attacking the girl, they made a split second decision to use a taser to gain control over the attacker and i think the use of the taser was fully justified in this instance considering what they were confronted with. Also the police did not intend to kill the guy, it was not an execution, the taser was used to gain control of the situation and the guy died from it, when he became unresponsive the police and medics on the scene tried to revive him but it did'nt work. If the police wanted him dead then why would they try to revive him? Many criminals in todays society carry guns while the majority of our police do not (bar the armed response units). I think having a taser is the next best thing the police can carry to defend themselves or gain control of difficult situations, instead of actually being issued with guns. The police do a difficult, dangerous job and should be given the latest best protective equipment and tech weapons to enable them to do their job safely and protect law abiding citizens. This cannibal killer was not a law abiding citizen, he was a murderer who was caught in the act. Someone else who knows nothing of a police officers oath, no mention of protecting law abiding citizens, or being a public servant to law abiding citizens, ignorance is no excuse for the law, you should read up on common law, educate your narrow minds before getting into debates you know nothing about, no matter what our _iews, the police take an oath, that is their job, not to make their own minds up as they go, " Have you been in trouble with the police at one time ? Would seem you have a major chip on your shoulder against them. Hence your very weird _iews about a face eating cannibal freak being a law abiding citizen. | |||
| |||
"I'm guessing if the police were not armed with tasers they would have had to have used other methods to get him off the victim. Maybe smashing him over the head with a truncheon. How primitive,,,, ?? What would you suggest?? Give him a cuddle?" Give him some cutlery, I guess, and a serviette, maybe that fits in better with some of the daft people's comments on here, | |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous The police did use judgement based on what they found when they entered that room and found the guy attacking the girl, they made a split second decision to use a taser to gain control over the attacker and i think the use of the taser was fully justified in this instance considering what they were confronted with. Also the police did not intend to kill the guy, it was not an execution, the taser was used to gain control of the situation and the guy died from it, when he became unresponsive the police and medics on the scene tried to revive him but it did'nt work. If the police wanted him dead then why would they try to revive him? Many criminals in todays society carry guns while the majority of our police do not (bar the armed response units). I think having a taser is the next best thing the police can carry to defend themselves or gain control of difficult situations, instead of actually being issued with guns. The police do a difficult, dangerous job and should be given the latest best protective equipment and tech weapons to enable them to do their job safely and protect law abiding citizens. This cannibal killer was not a law abiding citizen, he was a murderer who was caught in the act. Someone else who knows nothing of a police officers oath, no mention of protecting law abiding citizens, or being a public servant to law abiding citizens, ignorance is no excuse for the law, you should read up on common law, educate your narrow minds before getting into debates you know nothing about, no matter what our _iews, the police take an oath, that is their job, not to make their own minds up as they go, I do know the police officers oath, and they were trying to save/protect the girl who was being attacked first and foremost as she was the victim of this crime.....he was the criminal in this instance. The police did have a duty of care to protect him while in their custody, i read up on the case and after he was tasered so they could control him he was arrested and became unresponsive. Upon becoming unresponsive the police and medics tried to revive him. " As I said, a policemans oath does not mention victim or criminal, But to protect all, there were 5 officers, I believe,,,,,, 5 wannabe super heroes in "you can't touch me" uniforms couldn't manage to get one idiot under control? On a weekend in town, 5 wannabe hero coppers will take on crowds of people spending money (including taxes) which help pay their wages, pushing the half intoxicated, fun loving public around & thinking they're something special & invincible, including wpc's, but it seems the wannabe's were scared of a sober little hannibal lecter?
| |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous The police did use judgement based on what they found when they entered that room and found the guy attacking the girl, they made a split second decision to use a taser to gain control over the attacker and i think the use of the taser was fully justified in this instance considering what they were confronted with. Also the police did not intend to kill the guy, it was not an execution, the taser was used to gain control of the situation and the guy died from it, when he became unresponsive the police and medics on the scene tried to revive him but it did'nt work. If the police wanted him dead then why would they try to revive him? Many criminals in todays society carry guns while the majority of our police do not (bar the armed response units). I think having a taser is the next best thing the police can carry to defend themselves or gain control of difficult situations, instead of actually being issued with guns. The police do a difficult, dangerous job and should be given the latest best protective equipment and tech weapons to enable them to do their job safely and protect law abiding citizens. This cannibal killer was not a law abiding citizen, he was a murderer who was caught in the act. Someone else who knows nothing of a police officers oath, no mention of protecting law abiding citizens, or being a public servant to law abiding citizens, ignorance is no excuse for the law, you should read up on common law, educate your narrow minds before getting into debates you know nothing about, no matter what our _iews, the police take an oath, that is their job, not to make their own minds up as they go, Have you been in trouble with the police at one time ? Would seem you have a major chip on your shoulder against them. Hence your very weird _iews about a face eating cannibal freak being a law abiding citizen. " See the inability to read,,,,,, I didn't say he was law abiding, I said a policemans oath is to protect all public equally, they are the publics servants, as outdated as that sounds, it's a fact, I know law, I've studied law, in depth, and people who think that this guy is unacceptable & deserves what he gets, but that snorting a few grams of Charlie is ok, because you & your pissed up mates do it at the weekend, is ok, or may be to scam the benefits agency is not that bad, because after all,,,,, you have paid in for 20 years, so feel you're entitled to take a little out, are confused.com, the law is the law, you can't choose which laws are ok & which are not, it is across the board, not decided by the public, nor the police, my guess is most of you don't even know what a crime actually is or not? Apart from the plain obvious, you probably don't understand the abuse of power by the police on a daily basis, & don't know your own rights, but my main point is,,, its people like you who would contribute to innocents being condemned, if we had the death penalty & you were on the jury, because the police can't be wrong, or because you find that particular crime wrong,
| |||
| |||
"Interesting thread, this one. Firstly, what an appalling case. Truly shocking. Our thoughts go to the victim and her friends and family. Secondly, I am absolutely appalled and sickened that some have used this thread to make jokes. Thirdly, many have said the guy got what he deserved. Personally, I advocate having a death penalty for the very worst, most clear cut cases - such as this one. However, the law dictates that the state does not, no matter what the situation is or circumstances are, have the right to execute anyone. Even Ian Brady and the like, even after all the evidence has been heard and a jury has had plenty of time to weigh up someone's guilt. Even in the days of capital punishment, it was considered abhorrent to execute someone who was mad. Perhaps the perpetrator of this crime was mad? So it is surprising people are ok with a brand of justice that sees him effectively executed on the spot. For those who do, consider this: when tasers were first introduced, I remember reading with alarm of a case where a man in his 70s was tasered. What happens when someone like him dies after the use of such an awful instrument as the taser? An officer allegedly acted lawfully then, too. Oh, and his crime? A parking infringement. Not the sort of case where something like a taser should be used. Yet it was. So, whether a taser should be used becomes a matter if judgement, which, in my _iew, is very, very dangerous The police did use judgement based on what they found when they entered that room and found the guy attacking the girl, they made a split second decision to use a taser to gain control over the attacker and i think the use of the taser was fully justified in this instance considering what they were confronted with. Also the police did not intend to kill the guy, it was not an execution, the taser was used to gain control of the situation and the guy died from it, when he became unresponsive the police and medics on the scene tried to revive him but it did'nt work. If the police wanted him dead then why would they try to revive him? Many criminals in todays society carry guns while the majority of our police do not (bar the armed response units). I think having a taser is the next best thing the police can carry to defend themselves or gain control of difficult situations, instead of actually being issued with guns. The police do a difficult, dangerous job and should be given the latest best protective equipment and tech weapons to enable them to do their job safely and protect law abiding citizens. This cannibal killer was not a law abiding citizen, he was a murderer who was caught in the act. Someone else who knows nothing of a police officers oath, no mention of protecting law abiding citizens, or being a public servant to law abiding citizens, ignorance is no excuse for the law, you should read up on common law, educate your narrow minds before getting into debates you know nothing about, no matter what our _iews, the police take an oath, that is their job, not to make their own minds up as they go, Have you been in trouble with the police at one time ? Would seem you have a major chip on your shoulder against them. Hence your very weird _iews about a face eating cannibal freak being a law abiding citizen. " & for the record I don't have any chips on my shoulders, I have a head with an educated brain inside, & my _iews aren't weird, they are fact, it is you that is sharing mere _iews & opinions, I haven't been rude or abusive to anyone in this form, so I would appreciate the same courtesy in return, I am all for an educated debate, but won't have some uneducated half wit trying to tell me shit, and to be clear, how can you call him a freak? You didn't know him, because it is freaky to you, doesn't mean he's a freak, I've heard many people say,,,,, " them swinging people or wife swappers, are fucking weirdos or freaks" though I doubt you'd agree to that, but to them it is, because it's out of the norm to them, I don't condone cannibalism, nor do I find it normal, but who are you to call someone else a freak? Or judge anyone? After all we all have our crosses to bare, stones & glass houses, once again springs to mind.......... Let he without sin,,,,,,, & all that jazz,,,, | |||
| |||
"All i got to say is rest in peace to to the young innocent lady that died! She had a whole life in front of her and was cut short!! I think personally this thread should end out of respect for her and her loved ones!!" I agree, & I'm not for one moment agreeing that what he did was right or acceptable, my arguments are based purely on the law, & the law is the law I'm sad to say, but some people are so ignorant & narrow minded, they clearly don't have the mentality to see that in my posts, I'm merely trying to shed a little light on the facts, and not what we would like to see done, that is why the law is in place, without it we'd have barbaric gangs of crazy people roaming the streets looking to kill people who they thought were freaks, but an individuals personal opinion isn't allowed in law, for that very reason, the guidelines are set out very clearly, for each & every individual scenario to date, in the Archibald book of law, | |||
