FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Whats's all this about one liners?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Ok so write me a text book reply to a post which you would expect, that doesn't include material already in your profile ! Gee" You lazy git pen your own messages. Or is that the point you struggle to get past the Joey type greeting! Messages should be original and personal. You dont lick every pussy in the same way or i hope you don't and its the same with contacting people! There is no such thing as message school but maybe there should be!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Well said, I don't require "War & Peace" either but I do require more than "Hey you, fancy sucking my cock" It's just not that mentally simulating. " umm trying to make suck my cock mentally stimulating..... " while your down there can we consider what the difference between existence and essence is.? nope i agree not stimulating to the brain at all.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee" Firstly, may I say how pleased we all are (if I may be so bold as to speak for others on here) that you have felt comfortable enough to join us in this little corner of Swingerland in order to discuss what is clearly a matter of significant concern to you. The issue of message length is one that has caused confusion and consternation in almost exactly equal methods since the dawn of time itself (obviously this is itself a somewhat nebulous concept, but hopefully you will allow me this slight conceit in the interests of more fully addressing the wider issues that you have broought up), and the emergence of the internet as a primary method of communication within the homo sapien species has led to an exponential increase in the visibility of the problem, leading to much discussion among the intelligentsia. There are, it is felt, two schools of thought on the issue , as postulated in the early 1990's by the legendary internet relay chat (IRC) user "Wax_Off___(Regularly)": Always leave them wanting more. If in doubt, stick it in. To consider in the first instance the former of the two above-detailed methodologies, the positive characteristics are perceived as: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader can easily review the message in a short space of time. However, this being an imperfect world (and if you're still reading this...I'm free tonight...please pm address), there are, surprisingly to some, some negative attributes to be considered before plunging entirely down this path: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader has no material with which to make a judgement on the merits of the writer. Hang on...what was the question again? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee Firstly, may I say how pleased we all are (if I may be so bold as to speak for others on here) that you have felt comfortable enough to join us in this little corner of Swingerland in order to discuss what is clearly a matter of significant concern to you. The issue of message length is one that has caused confusion and consternation in almost exactly equal methods since the dawn of time itself (obviously this is itself a somewhat nebulous concept, but hopefully you will allow me this slight conceit in the interests of more fully addressing the wider issues that you have broought up), and the emergence of the internet as a primary method of communication within the homo sapien species has led to an exponential increase in the visibility of the problem, leading to much discussion among the intelligentsia. There are, it is felt, two schools of thought on the issue , as postulated in the early 1990's by the legendary internet relay chat (IRC) user "Wax_Off___(Regularly)": Always leave them wanting more. If in doubt, stick it in. To consider in the first instance the former of the two above-detailed methodologies, the positive characteristics are perceived as: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader can easily review the message in a short space of time. However, this being an imperfect world (and if you're still reading this...I'm free tonight...please pm address), there are, surprisingly to some, some negative attributes to be considered before plunging entirely down this path: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader has no material with which to make a judgement on the merits of the writer. Hang on...what was the question again?" me thinks you have to much time on your hands sharpy.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"My point is insults are easy you need to articulate yourself rather than posting insults." Do you actually intend to meet people on here or are you just going to moan and tantrum. Listen to what people say. Your being given some good advice. Failure to do so with give you nothing more than wankers cock from frustration and lack of meets. If your struggling to understand what people are saying ask them to simplify it! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee Firstly, may I say how pleased we all are (if I may be so bold as to speak for others on here) that you have felt comfortable enough to join us in this little corner of Swingerland in order to discuss what is clearly a matter of significant concern to you. The issue of message length is one that has caused confusion and consternation in almost exactly equal methods since the dawn of time itself (obviously this is itself a somewhat nebulous concept, but hopefully you will allow me this slight conceit in the interests of more fully addressing the wider issues that you have broought up), and the emergence of the internet as a primary method of communication within the homo sapien species has led to an exponential increase in the visibility of the problem, leading to much discussion among the intelligentsia. There are, it is felt, two schools of thought on the issue , as postulated in the early 1990's by the legendary internet relay chat (IRC) user "Wax_Off___(Regularly)": Always leave them wanting more. If in doubt, stick it in. To consider in the first instance the former of the two above-detailed methodologies, the positive characteristics are perceived as: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader can easily review the message in a short space of time. However, this being an imperfect world (and if you're still reading this...I'm free tonight...please pm address), there are, surprisingly to some, some negative attributes to be considered before plunging entirely down this path: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader has no material with which to make a judgement on the merits of the writer. Hang on...what was the question again?" Heck, haven't figured out yet what you meant in a previous thread about a woman being 'well inflated'. Am even more baffled now, lol. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Heck, haven't figured out yet what you meant in a previous thread about a woman being 'well inflated'. Am even more baffled now, lol." That one was a joke that I have sex with inflatables. This one is a joke about the OP's inability to see the middle ground between a one liner and a 10,000 word dissertation. Nice tits, btw... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee" Tried to think up something decent, but decided to go with "who the f'in hell cares if you think that" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Heck, haven't figured out yet what you meant in a previous thread about a woman being 'well inflated'. Am even more baffled now, lol. That one was a joke that I have sex with inflatables. This one is a joke about the OP's inability to see the middle ground between a one liner and a 10,000 word dissertation. Nice tits, btw..." 'Nice tits, btw'.....errrmm, that's definately a 'one liner'. Am so dissappointed, expected better from yourself, lol x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"or hi do u fancy a pint n a fuk lol" Your joking.wot that doesnt work.so thats where ive been going wrong.lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Heck, haven't figured out yet what you meant in a previous thread about a woman being 'well inflated'. Am even more baffled now, lol. That one was a joke that I have sex with inflatables. This one is a joke about the OP's inability to see the middle ground between a one liner and a 10,000 word dissertation. Nice tits, btw..." The middle ground between a dissertation and a one liner is called 'a profile', was my original point! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee Tried to think up something decent, but decided to go with "who the f'in hell cares if you think that"" dohhh! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"do you know what 'patronise' means? clearly not from your response!" You started the thread but others will reply to it in their own way, some answers you will agree with some you won't! That's life! It could be said that you, yourself, are patronising everyone who gives you an answer you don't like. But that could just be my opinion! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee Firstly, may I say how pleased we all are (if I may be so bold as to speak for others on here) that you have felt comfortable enough to join us in this little corner of Swingerland in order to discuss what is clearly a matter of significant concern to you. The issue of message length is one that has caused confusion and consternation in almost exactly equal methods since the dawn of time itself (obviously this is itself a somewhat nebulous concept, but hopefully you will allow me this slight conceit in the interests of more fully addressing the wider issues that you have broought up), and the emergence of the internet as a primary method of communication within the homo sapien species has led to an exponential increase in the visibility of the problem, leading to much discussion among the intelligentsia. There are, it is felt, two schools of thought on the issue , as postulated in the early 1990's by the legendary internet relay chat (IRC) user "Wax_Off___(Regularly)": Always leave them wanting more. If in doubt, stick it in. To consider in the first instance the former of the two above-detailed methodologies, the positive characteristics are perceived as: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader can easily review the message in a short space of time. However, this being an imperfect world (and if you're still reading this...I'm free tonight...please pm address), there are, surprisingly to some, some negative attributes to be considered before plunging entirely down this path: 1. The writer can send messages to large numbers of readers in a short space of time, and is not required to think about or consider any one individual reader in particular. 2. The writer's linguistic capabilities can be obscured to avoid being filtered out by readers who prioritise the ability to communicate coherently within their criteria. 3. The reader has no material with which to make a judgement on the merits of the writer. Hang on...what was the question again?" do you fancy a shag? lol! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Not long had a message saying "Meat" We replied "No thanks we're vegetarian" " Black carrot? lol! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee" Yeah I am a proverbial timewaster.... so I really am going you a favour when I tell you to **** ***! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"do you know what 'patronise' means? clearly not from your response! You started the thread but others will reply to it in their own way, some answers you will agree with some you won't! That's life! It could be said that you, yourself, are patronising everyone who gives you an answer you don't like. But that could just be my opinion! " I agree with you in as much as if you address the original point and add to it that is one thing! If you decide to get personal then that defeats the object! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" The middle ground between a dissertation and a one liner is called 'a profile', was my original point! " so go and look at other peoples profiles... the normal "profile" contains 2 lines and cock shot.... which seems like that is all the effort they all deem to have to make... lots of people like a few lines in an opening message something that contains a bit of personality... something that they may have taken a little time and thought over.... something that shows that people might have read the profile they are actually replying to... you get out what you put in.... if you only want to put in 1 lines effort then no one is stopping you.... however if that is all the effort you want to put in then you have no one to blame but yourself..... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"do you know what 'patronise' means? clearly not from your response! You started the thread but others will reply to it in their own way, some answers you will agree with some you won't! That's life! It could be said that you, yourself, are patronising everyone who gives you an answer you don't like. But that could just be my opinion! I agree with you in as much as if you address the original point and add to it that is one thing! If you decide to get personal then that defeats the object!" Getting personal with others is what it is all about on here isn't it? So what did everyone else have for tea tonight? Crispy chicken, chips and beans for me followed up with ice cream covered in raspberry sauce, it was great but feeling a wee bit stuffed now though! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"do you know what 'patronise' means? clearly not from your response! You started the thread but others will reply to it in their own way, some answers you will agree with some you won't! That's life! It could be said that you, yourself, are patronising everyone who gives you an answer you don't like. But that could just be my opinion! I agree with you in as much as if you address the original point and add to it that is one thing! If you decide to get personal then that defeats the object! Getting personal with others is what it is all about on here isn't it? So what did everyone else have for tea tonight? Crispy chicken, chips and beans for me followed up with ice cream covered in raspberry sauce, it was great but feeling a wee bit stuffed now though! " so where is the reference to the original post? (at the risk of being patronising lol!) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee" You make the HUGE assumption that everyone has bothered to fill in anything of any worth on their profile. NEWS FLASH.... they don't! Quite fankly I will write/request anything I damn well please if it helps me decide who is worth meeting. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"do you know what 'patronise' means? clearly not from your response! You started the thread but others will reply to it in their own way, some answers you will agree with some you won't! That's life! It could be said that you, yourself, are patronising everyone who gives you an answer you don't like. But that could just be my opinion! I agree with you in as much as if you address the original point and add to it that is one thing! If you decide to get personal then that defeats the object! Getting personal with others is what it is all about on here isn't it? So what did everyone else have for tea tonight? Crispy chicken, chips and beans for me followed up with ice cream covered in raspberry sauce, it was great but feeling a wee bit stuffed now though! so where is the reference to the original post? (at the risk of being patronising lol!)" There wasn't one, I was hijacking the thread for my own purpose to find out what others had for their tea! You will never keep a thread on track, especially when you start to patronise the people who are giving their own view to the original question! Again, that might just be my opinion. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee" Actually I agree with you. If your information is on your profile and you send a mail asking to check out your profile and if interested get back to you.....we would do just that. Why write a huge letter to get deleted by lots of people who do just that. The very first meet we ever had was with a lovely man who sent a one line message that made us laugh, we read his profile, had a chat on MSN and met for some great fun. For us it is how you word your mail not how many paragraphs there are. Not everyone wants the same things or expect the same things out of this site, so the only thing you can do is move away from the profiles you don't like the look of. Personally I think you have been treated pretty harsh on this thread for asking a question. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have now read lots of profiles which say, 'no one liners'. Is this being written by proverbial timewasters? The point is within your profile you are able to express what you're about, your age, sexuality what you like/dislike etc etc. Apparently for quite a few on here this is not enough. On top of this some people want a 10,000 word dissertation as to why you would like to meet them. Well I for one don't understand why I have to send someone an essay for them to say 'well actually you're not for us!'. I send winks and short messages to direct people to my profile. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Gee Actually I agree with you. If your information is on your profile and you send a mail asking to check out your profile and if interested get back to you.....we would do just that. Why write a huge letter to get deleted by lots of people who do just that. The very first meet we ever had was with a lovely man who sent a one line message that made us laugh, we read his profile, had a chat on MSN and met for some great fun. For us it is how you word your mail not how many paragraphs there are. Not everyone wants the same things or expect the same things out of this site, so the only thing you can do is move away from the profiles you don't like the look of. Personally I think you have been treated pretty harsh on this thread for asking a question." Thanks very much for reading the post and replying to it phew! Lots of ego maniacs on here! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"do you know what 'patronise' means? clearly not from your response! You started the thread but others will reply to it in their own way, some answers you will agree with some you won't! That's life! It could be said that you, yourself, are patronising everyone who gives you an answer you don't like. But that could just be my opinion! " I think he has been very restrained in his answers, and for the way he was spoken to by some , I am surprised he was restrained. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Thanks very much for reading the post and replying to it phew! Lots of ego maniacs on here!" that is not nice.... and i sometimes wonder why I and others have bothered if that is the way you are going to reply... so you thank the ones that agree with you.... and you decide to dismiss the one that point out something and disagreed with you..... thanks........ | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Thanks very much for reading the post and replying to it phew! Lots of ego maniacs on here! that is not nice.... and i sometimes wonder why I and others have bothered if that is the way you are going to reply... so you thank the ones that agree with you.... and you decide to dismiss the one that point out something and disagreed with you..... thanks........" After the posts I had taken off? that was tame by comparison. The man asked a question, not everyone answered politely...a couple of posts are still on if you want to check them out. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"do you know what 'patronise' means? clearly not from your response! You started the thread but others will reply to it in their own way, some answers you will agree with some you won't! That's life! It could be said that you, yourself, are patronising everyone who gives you an answer you don't like. But that could just be my opinion! I think he has been very restrained in his answers, and for the way he was spoken to by some , I am surprised he was restrained." Personally I think his opening post shows a great degree of ignorance. If you actually bother to state on your profile that you don't welcome one-liners (to save some of the one-liner writers the trouble) it is implied you are a timewaster. To be honest I'm pretty sick of folk waving the 'timewaster' finger at other people just because they don't like something on their profile and are not getting what they want. It implies everyone writes at least a half decent profile... they don't. It implies the only alternative to a one-liner is a rather long essay... which it isn't. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |