FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > UK to recognise Palestine as a state?
UK to recognise Palestine as a state?
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this also mean that we'll no longer recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation?
but don't they only exist because a certain bunch of morons decided the Palestinians weren't allowed their own state & called it Israel instead? Now, who could have possibly had a hand in that?????   "
As much as I agree that was a long time ago and doesn't excuse terrorism. Besides, where else should they have gone? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Although parliament voted to recognise Palestine it was a private members bill so the government can ignore it.
So in effect it makes no legal difference. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Although parliament voted to recognise Palestine it was a private members bill so the government can ignore it.
So in effect it makes no legal difference. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this also mean that we'll no longer recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation?
but don't they only exist because a certain bunch of morons decided the Palestinians weren't allowed their own state & called it Israel instead? Now, who could have possibly had a hand in that?????
As much as I agree that was a long time ago and doesn't excuse terrorism. Besides, where else should they have gone?"
exactly where they are now - it didn't all have to be named Israel, eh.
The 'that was a long time ago' phrase doesn't seem to wash very well all over the globe, I'm afraid.
Better brains were badly needed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Does this also mean that we'll no longer recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation?
but don't they only exist because a certain bunch of morons decided the Palestinians weren't allowed their own state & called it Israel instead? Now, who could have possibly had a hand in that?????
As much as I agree that was a long time ago and doesn't excuse terrorism. Besides, where else should they have gone?"
The problem with labels is they change from stand point. Terrorist today, but freedom fighter yesterday. The main point to be made is that land was given that they did not own.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Could not have put it better myself 
"Does this also mean that we'll no longer recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation?
but don't they only exist because a certain bunch of morons decided the Palestinians weren't allowed their own state & called it Israel instead? Now, who could have possibly had a hand in that????? "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this also mean that we'll no longer recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation?
but don't they only exist because a certain bunch of morons decided the Palestinians weren't allowed their own state & called it Israel instead? Now, who could have possibly had a hand in that?????
As much as I agree that was a long time ago and doesn't excuse terrorism. Besides, where else should they have gone?"
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Can I also state that many of Israels leaders / political figures where actually part of what were then deemed as terrorist organisations before it was declared Israel.
Which then should make you all questions...terrorist one day, freedom fighter the next.
The funny thing is, the Palestinian people never actually said to them sorry your not welcome. These leaders of today actually orchestrated several bombings on Palestinian land and killed many people. They then decided, sorry we like it here and we will kill in order to claim it. This only happened when the then US president at the time said to the Saudis that we will not support the state of Israel (It was King Faisal at the time) we will vote for you at the U.N but they didn't...and offered it there support so it all started.
If you read history and look at the events which lead up to this, it all becomes very very clear....Oh and no I am not antisemitic but my opinion on Zionism is some what dubious when it comes to humanity.
As for the vote, it is a publicity stunt, because when the PM himself and a lot of his senior cabinet decided to abstained using the line of, it's not the right time in the peace process, that then makes me question when is the right time for peace?????
"Does this also mean that we'll no longer recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation?
but don't they only exist because a certain bunch of morons decided the Palestinians weren't allowed their own state & called it Israel instead? Now, who could have possibly had a hand in that?????
As much as I agree that was a long time ago and doesn't excuse terrorism. Besides, where else should they have gone?
The problem with labels is they change from stand point. Terrorist today, but freedom fighter yesterday. The main point to be made is that land was given that they did not own. "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"Commons backs government call by 274 votes to 12.
If we recognise Palestine as a state what happens to the relationship with Israel?"
sort of......
the original bill did state the Government should “recognise the state of Palestine"
this wasn't going to get any support and was likely to cause friction in all parties.... so there was an ammendment added by the likes of jack straw and other high profile members
the ammendment was agreed with the speaker and put on the order book to vote...... they never voted on the original
whats the members bill actually said after an ammendment was added to it was the Government to “recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel” as part of a “contribution to securing a negotiated two-state solution” |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Commons backs government call by 274 votes to 12.
If we recognise Palestine as a state what happens to the relationship with Israel?
sort of......
the original bill did state the Government should “recognise the state of Palestine"
this wasn't going to get any support and was likely to cause friction in all parties.... so there was an ammendment added by the likes of jack straw and other high profile members
the ammendment was agreed with the speaker and put on the order book to vote...... they never voted on the original
whats the members bill actually said after an ammendment was added to it was the Government to “recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel” as part of a “contribution to securing a negotiated two-state solution”"
and with that in mind who the fuck were the 12 that said no!? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Commons backs government call by 274 votes to 12.
If we recognise Palestine as a state what happens to the relationship with Israel?
sort of......
the original bill did state the Government should “recognise the state of Palestine"
this wasn't going to get any support and was likely to cause friction in all parties.... so there was an ammendment added by the likes of jack straw and other high profile members
the ammendment was agreed with the speaker and put on the order book to vote...... they never voted on the original
whats the members bill actually said after an ammendment was added to it was the Government to “recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel” as part of a “contribution to securing a negotiated two-state solution”
and with that in mind who the fuck were the 12 that said no!? "
No doubt someone will come up with the suggestion, it was UKIP members who sneaked in the back door while no one was looking  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Commons backs government call by 274 votes to 12.
If we recognise Palestine as a state what happens to the relationship with Israel?
sort of......
the original bill did state the Government should “recognise the state of Palestine"
this wasn't going to get any support and was likely to cause friction in all parties.... so there was an ammendment added by the likes of jack straw and other high profile members
the ammendment was agreed with the speaker and put on the order book to vote...... they never voted on the original
whats the members bill actually said after an ammendment was added to it was the Government to “recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel” as part of a “contribution to securing a negotiated two-state solution”
and with that in mind who the fuck were the 12 that said no!?
No doubt someone will come up with the suggestion, it was UKIP members who sneaked in the back door while no one was looking "
Damn those pesky UKIPers!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Commons backs government call by 274 votes to 12.
If we recognise Palestine as a state what happens to the relationship with Israel?
sort of......
the original bill did state the Government should “recognise the state of Palestine"
this wasn't going to get any support and was likely to cause friction in all parties.... so there was an ammendment added by the likes of jack straw and other high profile members
the ammendment was agreed with the speaker and put on the order book to vote...... they never voted on the original
whats the members bill actually said after an ammendment was added to it was the Government to “recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel” as part of a “contribution to securing a negotiated two-state solution”
and with that in mind who the fuck were the 12 that said no!?
No doubt someone will come up with the suggestion, it was UKIP members who sneaked in the back door while no one was looking
Damn those pesky UKIPers! "
What all 1 of them haha |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I guess since there was no expenses quota attached to the vote or consultation fee he is probably some what engaged elsewhere.....sometimes I do wonder why we even have him
"What does our man in the middle east Tony B Liar think.......or is he too busy squirreling away his fortune?  "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"What does our man in the middle east Tony B Liar think.......or is he too busy squirreling away his fortune? "
he is kinda busy at the moment... you know... with the trial that is starting today about the people who were plotting to kill him
the interesting part that case is some is going to be held in public...
some is going to be held with the jury and some of the press, who will not be able to report it......
and some is going to be held with just the jury only....
so a lot of the trial is never going to be made available in the public domain |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Is he still on the pay roll??? Haha come on now. Is that a question that you really need to ask.
When's the last time you heard of a politician or ex politician now in some advisory capacity doing something out of the goodness of their heart...and pocket for that matter.
"We've not heard a peep out of him about Syria or I.S. is he still on the payroll?"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What does our man in the middle east Tony B Liar think.......or is he too busy squirreling away his fortune?
he is kinda busy at the moment... you know... with the trial that is starting today about the people who were plotting to kill him
the interesting part that case is some is going to be held in public...
some is going to be held with the jury and some of the press, who will not be able to report it......
and some is going to be held with just the jury only....
so a lot of the trial is never going to be made available in the public domain"
A trial?Fancy that, a plot to kill him. He deserves justice, impeachment. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"
A trial?Fancy that, a plot to kill him. He deserves justice, impeachment. "
a plot to kill him and cherie blair as part of a wider terror plot that included something akin to a mumbai-style terror incident involving multiple people in multiple places.....
i wouldn't be that facetious if i were you.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
A trial?Fancy that, a plot to kill him. He deserves justice, impeachment.
a plot to kill him and cherie blair as part of a wider terror plot that included something akin to a mumbai-style terror incident involving multiple people in multiple places.....
i wouldn't be that facetious if i were you...."
How did we get into this position to become a target? The mischief was of his making. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"
A trial?Fancy that, a plot to kill him. He deserves justice, impeachment.
a plot to kill him and cherie blair as part of a wider terror plot that included something akin to a mumbai-style terror incident involving multiple people in multiple places.....
i wouldn't be that facetious if i were you....
How did we get into this position to become a target? The mischief was of his making."
him....
and her's.....???
and the multiple mass killing of innocent people there may of been as part of this incident......???? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
A trial?Fancy that, a plot to kill him. He deserves justice, impeachment.
a plot to kill him and cherie blair as part of a wider terror plot that included something akin to a mumbai-style terror incident involving multiple people in multiple places.....
i wouldn't be that facetious if i were you....
How did we get into this position to become a target? The mischief was of his making.
him....
and her's.....???
and the multiple mass killing of innocent people there may of been as part of this incident......????"
Fabio I was suggesting he be impeached, not murdered. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Does this also mean that we'll no longer recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation?
but don't they only exist because a certain bunch of morons decided the Palestinians weren't allowed their own state & called it Israel instead? Now, who could have possibly had a hand in that?????
As much as I agree that was a long time ago and doesn't excuse terrorism. Besides, where else should they have gone?"
Israel themselves bombed British soldiers so are not shy of terrorism themselves when need be...throw in genocide and that sums up a power hungry country who are doing no different to what the Syrian government are doing.
Palestine needs to be recognised and so does the harsh treatment to its country be Israel. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Is it me? Or are our politicians at it again and trying to score political points where we should be showing a united front?
Talk about mixed messages and short-sightedness, at present we are bombing ISIS and saying that we must remove destabilising influences from the middle east, yet with this vote we seem to be backing another such destabilising force. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Its all a nightmare, because both sides believe they have the Supernatural predestiny of the chosen ones to attain heaven at the expense of the other.
I dont understand the middle east.
We should leave both sides to work it out between them, it is not the business of The West.
Both sides do terrible things, one day they may be brothers. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
