 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
It's now illegal to upload pictures of ex's as revenge or humiliation and so on. Which could result in prison This could be harder policed then when you first look at it. Think of the depth you'd have to go through to prove they didn't have consent? Think there may be a few bitter ex's ruining a few lives in the near future. Sure after close investigation it could be worked out but after however long jobs could be lost, relationships ruined. What's stopping someone uploading a photo then saying it was there ex? Or someone else. Would be interesting to know the branches that spread off this tree.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Thing is, if it's been in the public domain (I.e posted in the internet, even in a space only seen by a few) then it's difficult to prove it's originating poster.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Here's a suggestion: don't post anything up of someone else  "
That would be the best, but still doesn't do much for the fucked on the head ex gf who caught you cheating so thinks "hmmm how can I get that wanker back" so uploads pictures of herself, then rings police or whoever it is then puts the waterworks on and hey presto criminal investigation. A case of your work against there's. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nnyMan
over a year ago
Glasgow |
From the Telegraph
Naturists in Britain have written to Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary complaining that the new Revenge Porn Bill discriminates against people who practice nudism.
Last week Mr Graying announced a new criminal offence of posting so-called 'revenge pornography' on the internet, which will carry a maximum sentence of two years.
Cruel individuals who publish intimate pictures or videos to retaliate against their former partners will be targeted with the new law, which will also catch those sending explicit photographs in text messages between mobile phones.
However naturists claim that the Bill does not distinguish between pornography and nudity.
The Bill states that it will be an offence to post online, or publish in hard copy, images showing “genitals exposed”.
However, nudists claim that 'Innocent full-frontal naturist photography', showing family and friends naked on a legal nudist beach, at a sun club or in a private garden, might then be deemed, in law, as ‘pornographic’. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Here's a suggestion: don't post anything up of someone else
That would be the best, but still doesn't do much for the fucked on the head ex gf who caught you cheating so thinks "hmmm how can I get that wanker back" so uploads pictures of herself, then rings police or whoever it is then puts the waterworks on and hey presto criminal investigation. A case of your work against there's."
Seriously? 
Are you really saying that a law that primarily protects womem is a bad thing because it could be maliciously used against men? That's pretty twisted logic to be honest |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"From the Telegraph
Naturists in Britain have written to Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary complaining that the new Revenge Porn Bill discriminates against people who practice nudism.
Last week Mr Graying announced a new criminal offence of posting so-called 'revenge pornography' on the internet, which will carry a maximum sentence of two years.
Cruel individuals who publish intimate pictures or videos to retaliate against their former partners will be targeted with the new law, which will also catch those sending explicit photographs in text messages between mobile phones.
However naturists claim that the Bill does not distinguish between pornography and nudity.
The Bill states that it will be an offence to post online, or publish in hard copy, images showing “genitals exposed”.
However, nudists claim that 'Innocent full-frontal naturist photography', showing family and friends naked on a legal nudist beach, at a sun club or in a private garden, might then be deemed, in law, as ‘pornographic’."
So don't take naked pics. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Here's a suggestion: don't post anything up of someone else
That would be the best, but still doesn't do much for the fucked on the head ex gf who caught you cheating so thinks "hmmm how can I get that wanker back" so uploads pictures of herself, then rings police or whoever it is then puts the waterworks on and hey presto criminal investigation. A case of your work against there's.
Seriously?
Are you really saying that a law that primarily protects womem is a bad thing because it could be maliciously used against men? That's pretty twisted logic to be honest"
just a _iew on this, but im not saying the law would be a bad thing, anything that helps protect people is good, but actually what the person above explained will happen alot, we already have alot of similar things happening, a woman scorned and all that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Spoken like a true gentleman.
