FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Aparently!
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think with the public feeling the way they do about what happened protection is the only option " On a seperate matter... amazing profile x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong." Or for people to draw attention to the fact the name is there on a social site so they then may google it? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong." yes it is! after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently ) Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong. yes it is! after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently ) Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved." . I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong." And if it turns out not to be him and a mob rips him limb from limb? The guilty need to be punished but nobody is guilty till the court pass sentence. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong." You raised 5 points, alas you don't seem able to comprehend any of them. I am so sorry that all the dogs died but maybe direct your energy elsewhere, a social site isn't doing much apart form the sympathy vote for you. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong. And if it turns out not to be him and a mob rips him limb from limb? The guilty need to be punished but nobody is guilty till the court pass sentence." Exactly! Send him to Royal Marine Commando school (whatever that is) because someone has named him of Facebook unbelievable! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong. yes it is! after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently ) Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him." i didnt say you did but others have. they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening. I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong. yes it is! after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently ) Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him. i didnt say you did but others have. they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening. I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong. yes it is! after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently ) Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved." I have no idea about this but how the hell does anyone know for sure it was him? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I didnt see it on facebook! Saw it on a new site!. " so how do you know its right? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong. yes it is! after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently ) Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him. i didnt say you did but others have. they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening. I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people." i was thinking more along the lines of they would teach him, control, self discipline, respect, and the difference between right and wrong which he clearly doesnt know. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The name is out of the boy who set the dogs home on fire. The family are known to local police as was the boy. They have all been taken into 'protection'. So this is why i pay tax? To protect a boy and his family because he did somthing so very wrong. yes it is! after reading some of the horrendous posts on here about him i am not at all surprised that they need protection. People have been absolutely vile on here. i weep for society with some of the comments...wanting to set him on fire etc. Adults threatening the life of a young person (not allowed to call him a child apparently ) Yes, he did a bad thing, yes it was tragic that so many animals died because of him but he has been caught, he will be punished. No on else needs to be involved.. I dont think he should be set of fire, and never suggested or said that!. I was thinking more along the lines of Royal Marines commando school for him, at least then my tax's would be to benefit him rather than hiding him. i didnt say you did but others have. they are going to benefit....not allowing vigilanty justice from happening. I'm not sure i would wan the sot of kid that sets fire to dogs homes learning how to shoot and kill people. i was thinking more along the lines of they would teach him, control, self discipline, respect, and the difference between right and wrong which he clearly doesnt know. " from what little i know of the military training i think they look for people who already know that bit. The military is not a reformative school for little shits. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! " see..told you....vile! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I worry about the amount if vigil antis we have on here....he hasn't been found guilty and it's no different to put another high risk offenders into witness protection such as murders and rapists etc " I mean protection not just witness protection | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Fear not, I have just paid HMRC an extra penny to cover all of Fab's members (and future members for the next 10 years) contribution towards this. You're welcome." Not a regular posters, but may I pretty please beg for " TINA TITZ" insurance? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! " if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip" Yes | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! see..told you....vile!" Ur vile | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! see..told you....vile! Ur vile " witty | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! see..told you....vile! Ur vile witty " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes " this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I actually think its a shame people make assumptions and the vigilantes start to appear From all the reports I've seen the police have urged the family to move away for protection not that they are protecting them, the boy in question was recently in hospital after a serious attack from a dog which was stabbed to death by a neighbour to get it off him and the police are clear that they understand he is one of a handful of people who played a role in the fire. I always thought innocent till proven guilty was the case in this country " So he gave back what a dog done to him In that case get him burnt | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I actually think its a shame people make assumptions and the vigilantes start to appear From all the reports I've seen the police have urged the family to move away for protection not that they are protecting them, the boy in question was recently in hospital after a serious attack from a dog which was stabbed to death by a neighbour to get it off him and the police are clear that they understand he is one of a handful of people who played a role in the fire. I always thought innocent till proven guilty was the case in this country " me too but this looks like a case of act first ask questions later. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now " Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse?? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??" one is not better than the other. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse?? one is not better than the other. " So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"How many dogs died?" 60+ only coz 150 were saved so could have been them all had they not been saved | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse?? one is not better than the other. So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant?" we are either doing this on here or in PM, you have just asked me the same question there and i have replied. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"How many dogs died?" 60 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse?? one is not better than the other. So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant?" . It was 40 dogs not hundreds befor someone says you need to get your facts right. I do think you saying burn him is way too harsh though | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes " your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already.. take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"How many dogs died?" Too many. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already.. take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react.." and then have a think about the irony of it all | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already.. take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react.." So what us punishment for burning all those dogs maybe u should have a pep talk with him | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse?? one is not better than the other. So go on then what sort of punishment does the murder of hundreds of dogs warrant?. It was 40 dogs not hundreds befor someone says you need to get your facts right. I do think you saying burn him is way too harsh though " I know my facts pal! U think the fire was started thinkin oh 150 will get saved | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse??" Stop acting so vile, no real need. The bottom line is, he may not have intended to set fire to it with a _iew to killing animals, just been a bored child who for all we know may have had a terrible upbringing and society has thrown him onto the scrapheap. The evidence isn't clear, nothing is known about him - that's what a police investigation is for. Burning someone to death or kicking a child to death, if you think that is the answer then I'd love to know what you've don't to ever change the british justice system or to change the lives of those who aren't privileged. On a positive note, the dogs home has been inundated with generosity. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes this actually sickens me!! you would actually be willing to set another person on fire or are you just trying to be controversial to whip up the forums? if its not the latter i'll book the psych evaluation now Pm me for my address then Isnt setting fire to hundreds of dogs worse?? Stop acting so vile, no real need. The bottom line is, he may not have intended to set fire to it with a _iew to killing animals, just been a bored child who for all we know may have had a terrible upbringing and society has thrown him onto the scrapheap. The evidence isn't clear, nothing is known about him - that's what a police investigation is for. Burning someone to death or kicking a child to death, if you think that is the answer then I'd love to know what you've don't to ever change the british justice system or to change the lives of those who aren't privileged. On a positive note, the dogs home has been inundated with generosity. " Yes i donated!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Burn the little rat! if it were ever the case that burning someone was ever on the statute one can only assume you would carry out the act yes..? get a grip Yes your talking rubbish but then again I suspect you know that already.. take yourself down to the burns unit at your local hospital and see what the effects of being burnt actually are and then if your still minded to be the executioner pop into your local fire station and explain to them that you think burning someone alive is a justified form of punishment and see how they react.. So what us punishment for burning all those dogs maybe u should have a pep talk with him" the punishment will be if found guilty as per the law of the land.. same as or you of for I if we were to be under the system for whatever.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |