FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Scottish independence,thoughts.
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you lot listen to Salmond and the rest of his cronies, he will have you all dressed in your skirts standing on the border throwing bricks at the English " Salmond is a first class bigot and imbecile but who is worse, the fool who leads or the fool who follows? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just hope the yes voters don't expect any of our taxes to sub them and why should they use the pound if they want out or anything else British " It makes sense to use the pound as we still have to help pay off national debt Sick of hearing this now . I think you will find Scotland wont need your taxes either , if anything we put more money in the Westminster pot than we get out. There is a no campaign running because of the money we contribute , and because we are needed for trident. If we were just a sponge to England I'm pretty sure they would have cut us off a long time ago. I find it it extremely sad that people are taking it so personally and spouting hatred towards each other. I have not once tried to bring down English people or be abusive since this all started . It's not a personal attack , it's politics . Just think about why Westminster are so keen to keep us if we are drain on the rest of the nation. That doesn't make sense .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Looking back at some of these comments ... And you wonder why we want independence??? " It's like an upcoming divorce and the kids are getting stressy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you lot listen to Salmond the rest of his cronies, he will have you all dressed in your skirts standing on the border throwing bricks at the English Salmond is a first class bigot and imbecile but who is worse, the fool who leads or the fool who follows?" The vote is for independence , not Alex salmond. If we get it we can vote in anybody we want to . Alex is only running the campaign , The Tories are using Labour MPs for the No campaign to sway Scottish labour voters in to voting No. Not seen anything from Cameron in the debates because Scotland is a mostly Labour voting country . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"First off im a yes voter. I deplore unreasonable behaviour toward another because of their views, I will however debate, simply because I enjoy it. What I cannot stand though is misinformation, this causes views to be askew and somewhat silly. So, here goes. The bank of England is a name of a financial institution that sets interest rates and prints currency based on our GDP, credit rating, deficit, assets et al (the list is long but you get what I mean) This financial institution does NOT belong to England, it belongs to the UK. Scotland owns part of it, deficit, assets and responsibility. The rest of the UK cannot take from Scotland what it part owns, this is theft. Basic law. If the real of the UK decides to do this remember the deficit too. Secondly, there seems to be a thought chain that we are voting for Alec Salmond, we are NOT. We are voting on the question "Do we want to be an independent nation" Yes or No? Thirdly, we have a devolved parliament, what this means is that we have some governing powers. It means we decide how we spend the money that comes from the treasury, that we contribute to. Fourthly, Scotland will still be attached to the UK, we will still trade etc with the rest of the UK the EU the World, there is no economic sense in taking a huff if we walk away, the scenario of huff is what the no campaign is selling. Childish and frankly laughable should we become independent. Independent Scotland would then vote in a general election next year to decide which political part governs. Most no voters (my brother included) Are terrified at the prospect of a Socialist Labour getting control, even some Labour politicians are afraid of this outcome, I've even heard it said that to go back to this is unthinkable. Now, do we risk it? I for one am convinced that long term benefits far out weigh the short term risks. Its better to be prepared for an.opportunity when one comes along than be ill prepared and it passes you by. I believe we are prepared." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"First off im a yes voter. I deplore unreasonable behaviour toward another because of their views, I will however debate, simply because I enjoy it. What I cannot stand though is misinformation, this causes views to be askew and somewhat silly. So, here goes. The bank of England is a name of a financial institution that sets interest rates and prints currency based on our GDP, credit rating, deficit, assets et al (the list is long but you get what I mean) This financial institution does NOT belong to England, it belongs to the UK. Scotland owns part of it, deficit, assets and responsibility. The rest of the UK cannot take from Scotland what it part owns, this is theft. Basic law. If the real of the UK decides to do this remember the deficit too. Secondly, there seems to be a thought chain that we are voting for Alec Salmond, we are NOT. We are voting on the question "Do we want to be an independent nation" Yes or No? Thirdly, we have a devolved parliament, what this means is that we have some governing powers. It means we decide how we spend the money that comes from the treasury, that we contribute to. Fourthly, Scotland will still be attached to the UK, we will still trade etc with the rest of the UK the EU the World, there is no economic sense in taking a huff if we walk away, the scenario of huff is what the no campaign is selling. Childish and frankly laughable should we become independent. Independent Scotland would then vote in a general election next year to decide which political part governs. Most no voters (my brother included) Are terrified at the prospect of a Socialist Labour getting control, even some Labour politicians are afraid of this outcome, I've even heard it said that to go back to this is unthinkable. Now, do we risk it? I for one am convinced that long term benefits far out weigh the short term risks. Its better to be prepared for an.opportunity when one comes along than be ill prepared and it passes you by. I believe we are prepared." What that man said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is the problem ,I keep telling you they wont go ,they don't have the Balls." It's stuff like this that makes me hate politics. Comments about not having the balls are pointless, rude and uninformed. It's not about balls. I'm sick of the whole thing. Sick of the division it's caused, sick of the nastiness, sick of people talking about it from an emotional stance, sick of the patriotic viewpoint, sick of unanswered questions and I'm utterly sick of the egos involved. It's bullshit. Half the people voting have no idea what they're talking about. I've already heard of a postal vote being spoiled by a third party and landing back on the voters doormat. Whatever happens, I'd like to stop reading the utter bilge that it seems to encourage. I'd like an end to the thoughtless comments from those who don't know very much about it. I'd like to continue to live in the country I was born in without walking down the street being bothered by yes/no posters in windows. I don't want to come home to yes/no junk mail through my door when people are having to visit foodbanks and taxpayers money is wasted on shite that goes in the bin and I'd like people to be able to vote for what they choose, as is their right without being insulted. Debate is good when it's informed and doesn't get personal. Insulting others because of their choice is rude and ignorant. I'm off to do something else cause this soapbox is old and tired. Live and let live. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm a Scot living in England. . Initally my heart was telling me YES but my head NO... However over the past couple of months ive seen such racist and anti Scottish bigotry that i find my head now saying YES... I don't abuse anyone for their nationality. . We were a proud nation once and we will continue to be...we may be small as an independent country but big in our hearts and minds knowing that we will have an elected government working for the good of Scotland. The racists and bigots can say and do what they like... we dont need them!" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm a Scot living in England. . Initally my heart was telling me YES but my head NO... However over the past couple of months ive seen such racist and anti Scottish bigotry that i find my head now saying YES... I don't abuse anyone for their nationality. . We were a proud nation once and we will continue to be...we may be small as an independent country but big in our hearts and minds knowing that we will have an elected government working for the good of Scotland. The racists and bigots can say and do what they like... we dont need them!" I've seen this racism on both sides and it makes me uncomfortable. Scottish parenting with English upbringing means I looked at the countries the same as I do our counties..Different regions of one beautiful, proud Island. I think Capitalism has a lot to answer for, and we're all being divided by corporations so they can conquer all of us | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm a Scot living in England. . Initally my heart was telling me YES but my head NO... However over the past couple of months ive seen such racist and anti Scottish bigotry that i find my head now saying YES... I don't abuse anyone for their nationality. . We were a proud nation once and we will continue to be...we may be small as an independent country but big in our hearts and minds knowing that we will have an elected government working for the good of Scotland. The racists and bigots can say and do what they like... we dont need them! I've seen this racism on both sides and it makes me uncomfortable. Scottish parenting with English upbringing means I looked at the countries the same as I do our counties..Different regions of one beautiful, proud Island. I think Capitalism has a lot to answer for, and we're all being divided by corporations so they can conquer all of us" Not sure about the capitalist thingy, think that affect the whole world and not just this vote. I too lived in England (Devon) for 7 years, I've never experienced closet racism as much in my life. Born and grew up in a very multi cultural Glasgow environment and was shocked at how people spike and acted toward me as a Scot, especially as a Glaswegian, in Devon. There were some good people whom I still call friends since moving back. What frightens me most of all about staying in the UK is one thing and one thing alone. UKiP that my friends is scarier than walking away and when faced with fear (which I naturally have) of the unknown or UKiP I choose the former. Make no mistake that lot are growing exponentially and will either govern or coalesse | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The bank of England is a name of a financial institution that sets interest rates and prints currency based on our GDP, credit rating, deficit, assets et al (the list is long but you get what I mean) This financial institution does NOT belong to England, it belongs to the UK. Scotland owns part of it, deficit, assets and responsibility. The rest of the UK cannot take from Scotland what it part owns, this is theft. Basic law. " Could be wrong but i've not heard anyone say that if the vote is yes then the B of E will 'take' what is owned etc..? Whether the threat of not being allowed to stay in what would be a foreign currency post yes will materialise is largely speculation at this point.. But if the decision is made to not allow an independent Scotland to keep the pound after a transition period to sort out the balance sheet etc then what can Scotland actually do? I see it a bit like one of ones kids leaving home and standing on their own 2 feet and we know the bank of 'mum and dad' in most cases is still available when that happens but this is a bye, don't need you type of leaving so why should one larger economy look after the other..? also if the confidence about being better off post independence is so high from the yes side why haven't they not proposed a period of transition then they will have their own currency, a Scottish currency be that the Euro or whatever..? surely that would sway the not yet decided and swing a few no voters behind the campaign.. just seems like a bit of a 'trust me' exercise from another bloody egotistical politician and we've seen plenty of those, and its not only you lot up there that hate the bloody tories.. stuck with them but that democracy.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? " That is democracy for 49% of the people voting (over simplified) if you get independence then there will be a % who didn't want it, and the first government of Scotland will have a winning party that some did not vote for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? That is democracy for 49% of the people voting (over simplified) if you get independence then there will be a % who didn't want it, and the first government of Scotland will have a winning party that some did not vote for. " Yes but we will be governed by ourselves and not by your leave Westminster, lets not hide behind diplomacy look at the anti Scottish comments on this thread alone, I've found this sentiment very common but mainly from uninformed bigots | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Currency Union simply will not happen - regardless of Alex's 'mandate' - because it takes two parties to agree. The rUK electorate will not vote in 2015 for any politician/party that will sign up to allow our pensions & savings to be used to backstop a foreign competitors monetary & economics systems. I too am fed up with it so i hope Scotland leaves. Good bye and Good Luck, sure it will work out for you and i wish you well - I'm just not having you doing it on my pension. If its right that Scotland acts in her own interests then it is right that the UK acts in our interests, that means no Currency Union. Alex Salmond - "I have a mandate from 5 million people". UK Govt "Here's one from 55 million people saying No"." Wow you speak for 55 million???? How did you get that? Clearly you have no clue about what the currency debate is about, another ill informed opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And many are upset by the Anglophobia diplayed by the SNP. This debate has really soured relations between us, which is one reason i want Scotland to leave. Also, Scotland is looking like being a bitterly divided Coyntry & I'd rather we didn't have to deal with the aftermath." Again we are NOT voting for the SNP what don't you understand? And if you think this about anti English you are sorely mistaken. England is PART of a union, 4 countries, together. Typical absolutely typical Anglo egotistical attitude | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Currency Union simply will not happen - regardless of Alex's 'mandate' - because it takes two parties to agree. The rUK electorate will not vote in 2015 for any politician/party that will sign up to allow our pensions & savings to be used to backstop a foreign competitors monetary & economics systems. I too am fed up with it so i hope Scotland leaves. Good bye and Good Luck, sure it will work out for you and i wish you well - I'm just not having you doing it on my pension. If its right that Scotland acts in her own interests then it is right that the UK acts in our interests, that means no Currency Union. Alex Salmond - "I have a mandate from 5 million people". UK Govt "Here's one from 55 million people saying No". Wow you speak for 55 million???? How did you get that? Clearly you have no clue about what the currency debate is about, another ill informed opinion." actually he has a point.... if the 5 million who get a vote actually have the power of the 55 million who don't over the currency... if any politician had balls... if the vote is yes, the next day someone should set up a referendum asking the 55 million of us if we want a currency union... it might be in scotlands interest, but as the 3 main party leaders have said... its not in rUK's interest.... and the govenor of the bank of england... and the leading ecomonic civil servant and the first minister of wales.... and the first minister of northern ireland....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Currency Union simply will not happen - regardless of Alex's 'mandate' - because it takes two parties to agree. The rUK electorate will not vote in 2015 for any politician/party that will sign up to allow our pensions & savings to be used to backstop a foreign competitors monetary & economics systems. I too am fed up with it so i hope Scotland leaves. Good bye and Good Luck, sure it will work out for you and i wish you well - I'm just not having you doing it on my pension. If its right that Scotland acts in her own interests then it is right that the UK acts in our interests, that means no Currency Union. Alex Salmond - "I have a mandate from 5 million people". UK Govt "Here's one from 55 million people saying No". Wow you speak for 55 million???? How did you get that? Clearly you have no clue about what the currency debate is about, another ill informed opinion." Bank of England, UK Govt, leaders of all main parties, opinion polls, all say NO to any proposed Currency Union. How much of a mandate do you require before you understand it is not the will of the rUK to backstop a potential competitor State? And it is supposed to be the English who are arrogant.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you lot listen to Salmond the rest of his cronies, he will have you all dressed in your skirts standing on the border throwing bricks at the English Salmond is a first class bigot and imbecile but who is worse, the fool who leads or the fool who follows? The vote is for independence , not Alex salmond. If we get it we can vote in anybody we want to . Alex is only running the campaign , The Tories are using Labour MPs for the No campaign to sway Scottish labour voters in to voting No. Not seen anything from Cameron in the debates because Scotland is a mostly Labour voting country . " The tory's have been dead in the water in Scottish politics for decades! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? " you tell me.... in scotland only 40% of people voted for the snp... and yet.... 60% are being governed by a party they didn't vote for! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just hope the yes voters don't expect any of our taxes to sub them and why should they use the pound if they want out or anything else British It makes sense to use the pound as we still have to help pay off national debt Sick of hearing this now . I think you will find Scotland wont need your taxes either , if anything we put more money in the Westminster pot than we get out. There is a no campaign running because of the money we contribute , and because we are needed for trident. If we were just a sponge to England I'm pretty sure they would have cut us off a long time ago. I find it it extremely sad that people are taking it so personally and spouting hatred towards each other. I have not once tried to bring down English people or be abusive since this all started . It's not a personal attack , it's politics . Just think about why Westminster are so keen to keep us if we are drain on the rest of the nation. That doesn't make sense ...." Countries United are clearly stronger and also, it's all we've known for 300+years. However if Scotland votes Yes, the real winners are the Conservative Party, as Scotland contributed 52 seats to the Lab/Lib parties at the last election. As for abusive English folk, I think you'll find a lot of that is down to that bigot, Salmonds, and the SNPs, anti-English rhetoric. Until I lived in Dundee for 12 years, I never realised how rascist, bigoted, with massive chips on their shoulders, a large amount of the Scottish population were. Salmond is a fool with no firm or real plans and no real idea as to where this is going. He can't get into Europe without accepting the Euro, he has no secure fiscal policy or future for a fledgling country in a hard ball world. He is screwing the Scottish tax payer and is of the same mild as Blair. But he sees himself as a modern day Robert The Bruce however he is more of a Wallace(or Wally)-great rhetoric and tug on the heart strings of the Scots but when you lift the veil of illusion, the truth is very different. As some of my pro-union/anti-SNP and Scottish friends say, " let us have Independance and then when we've pissed it up and are broke again, begging to come back in, leave us." Remember why there was an Act of Union? Because Scotland was broke. Follow Salmond on this undiscernable path, history will judge the folly or sense of a Scottish YES vote, not us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? " That comment pretty much sums up the lack of political awareness of the average yes voter. Aside from that, is there not a considerable irony in not wanting to be part of the United Kingdom because of a perceived lack of political representation and yet wanting to be part of the the EU and have even less political representation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Currency Union simply will not happen - regardless of Alex's 'mandate' - because it takes two parties to agree. The rUK electorate will not vote in 2015 for any politician/party that will sign up to allow our pensions & savings to be used to backstop a foreign competitors monetary & economics systems. I too am fed up with it so i hope Scotland leaves. Good bye and Good Luck, sure it will work out for you and i wish you well - I'm just not having you doing it on my pension. If its right that Scotland acts in her own interests then it is right that the UK acts in our interests, that means no Currency Union. Alex Salmond - "I have a mandate from 5 million people". UK Govt "Here's one from 55 million people saying No". Wow you speak for 55 million???? How did you get that? Clearly you have no clue about what the currency debate is about, another ill informed opinion. Bank of England, UK Govt, leaders of all main parties, opinion polls, all say NO to any proposed Currency Union. How much of a mandate do you require before you understand it is not the will of the rUK to backstop a potential competitor State? And it is supposed to be the English who are arrogant.." The currency question is the biggest part of this issue because Scottish residents currently have pensions and savings that are in £GBP. Whatever Salmond says, if the Scots - post referendum - vote for Independence they will be between a rock and a hard place with the currency question. If rUK stands firm then the Scots will have £GBP debt to service with either a new currency or the €Euro. Whatever happens, the world (never mind rUK) would NOT allow Scotland to walk away from its debts. rUK are quite correct not to want a currency Union with a country that is proposing a lower Corporation Tax and has a naturally more generous social welfare system. It won't happen and yes voters have to prepared mentally to have their own currency linked to either the €Euro or £GBP. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? you tell me.... in scotland only 40% of people voted for the snp... and yet.... 60% are being governed by a party they didn't vote for! " Don't be ridiculous. The majority of voters in Scotland voted SNP those who didn't vote can't complain. We use proportional representation in Scotland, so your point is moot, and ill informed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lets give them independance. Theres billions in stationary etc changes which they cant afford. It doesnt have to be long term anyway....they are due to be invaded again " lol remember how far William Wallace got into England the last time. with Alex ...it could be the other way round! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you lot listen to Salmond and the rest of his cronies, he will have you all dressed in your skirts standing on the border throwing bricks at the English " Sounds like fun to me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just wish you stopped talking about it and just did it. Just remember when the going gets tough there will be no running back. Its always easier to solve problems with friends rather than on your own. Just a shame so many scot's are so gullible to Alex Salmond's false promises, he has represented his lying profession with honor. " Alistair Darling was asked recently "If we will be better together after the vote, how come we are not better together now" He didn't have an answer | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? you tell me.... in scotland only 40% of people voted for the snp... and yet.... 60% are being governed by a party they didn't vote for! Don't be ridiculous. The majority of voters in Scotland voted SNP those who didn't vote can't complain. We use proportional representation in Scotland, so your point is moot, and ill informed." not true... want to get your figures right.. they got 44% of the popular vote... which ended up with them getting 54% of the parliamentary seats...... so... 56% of the popular vote did not vote for the snp... figures from the scotish election website.... I'll wait for my apology.... don't think I'll get one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Currency Union simply will not happen - regardless of Alex's 'mandate' - because it takes two parties to agree. The rUK electorate will not vote in 2015 for any politician/party that will sign up to allow our pensions & savings to be used to backstop a foreign competitors monetary & economics systems. I too am fed up with it so i hope Scotland leaves. Good bye and Good Luck, sure it will work out for you and i wish you well - I'm just not having you doing it on my pension. If its right that Scotland acts in her own interests then it is right that the UK acts in our interests, that means no Currency Union. Alex Salmond - "I have a mandate from 5 million people". UK Govt "Here's one from 55 million people saying No". Wow you speak for 55 million???? How did you get that? Clearly you have no clue about what the currency debate is about, another ill informed opinion. Bank of England, UK Govt, leaders of all main parties, opinion polls, all say NO to any proposed Currency Union. How much of a mandate do you require before you understand it is not the will of the rUK to backstop a potential competitor State? And it is supposed to be the English who are arrogant.. The currency question is the biggest part of this issue because Scottish residents currently have pensions and savings that are in £GBP. Whatever Salmond says, if the Scots - post referendum - vote for Independence they will be between a rock and a hard place with the currency question. If rUK stands firm then the Scots will have £GBP debt to service with either a new currency or the €Euro. Whatever happens, the world (never mind rUK) would NOT allow Scotland to walk away from its debts. rUK are quite correct not to want a currency Union with a country that is proposing a lower Corporation Tax and has a naturally more generous social welfare system. It won't happen and yes voters have to prepared mentally to have their own currency linked to either the €Euro or £GBP." Another ill informed opinion Ok, pensions are NOT in a pot unless the are private pensions, the current workforce pay for pensions. If we split private pensions are safe as that's a deal.you did with a provider not the government. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? you tell me.... in scotland only 40% of people voted for the snp... and yet.... 60% are being governed by a party they didn't vote for! Don't be ridiculous. The majority of voters in Scotland voted SNP those who didn't vote can't complain. We use proportional representation in Scotland, so your point is moot, and ill informed. not true... want to get your figures right.. they got 44% of the popular vote... which ended up with them getting 54% of the parliamentary seats...... so... 56% of the popular vote did not vote for the snp... figures from the scotish election website.... I'll wait for my apology.... don't think I'll get one" My figures are correct. The MAJORITY voted SNP. The rest either voted Labour, Lib Dem, Conservative or Green. Do you understand Roberts rules? Probably not so probably don't even understand democracy. My original point was simple. We as a nation overwhelmingly voted in favour of something different to what we got. So we are governed as part of the UK. This is what irks most of us and always has. No apology except that maybe I can cone across as something im not, I think of myself as British but Scottish too. I afford no ill will against anything or anyone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So its nearly time for us Scots to vote yes or no to independence and the polls are showing its going to be very close, whats the views on the rest of the UK,do you want us to leave,stay or not bothered." Coming from an anglo couple we could not care less,the scots have always been a country full of squabblers with as much hatred towards each other than against England. Most of the uneducated section of the Scottish population are being systematically bribed with the promise of oil money in the north sea(projected profits) No army no navy no sod all they will just look to be propped up by the neighbours once again,in 40 years time they will be crying to be back in!but only if the oil has gone and its looking a tad on the grim side financially | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Currency Union simply will not happen - regardless of Alex's 'mandate' - because it takes two parties to agree. The rUK electorate will not vote in 2015 for any politician/party that will sign up to allow our pensions & savings to be used to backstop a foreign competitors monetary & economics systems. I too am fed up with it so i hope Scotland leaves. Good bye and Good Luck, sure it will work out for you and i wish you well - I'm just not having you doing it on my pension. If its right that Scotland acts in her own interests then it is right that the UK acts in our interests, that means no Currency Union. Alex Salmond - "I have a mandate from 5 million people". UK Govt "Here's one from 55 million people saying No". Wow you speak for 55 million???? How did you get that? Clearly you have no clue about what the currency debate is about, another ill informed opinion. Bank of England, UK Govt, leaders of all main parties, opinion polls, all say NO to any proposed Currency Union. How much of a mandate do you require before you understand it is not the will of the rUK to backstop a potential competitor State? And it is supposed to be the English who are arrogant.. The currency question is the biggest part of this issue because Scottish residents currently have pensions and savings that are in £GBP. Whatever Salmond says, if the Scots - post referendum - vote for Independence they will be between a rock and a hard place with the currency question. If rUK stands firm then the Scots will have £GBP debt to service with either a new currency or the €Euro. Whatever happens, the world (never mind rUK) would NOT allow Scotland to walk away from its debts. rUK are quite correct not to want a currency Union with a country that is proposing a lower Corporation Tax and has a naturally more generous social welfare system. It won't happen and yes voters have to prepared mentally to have their own currency linked to either the €Euro or £GBP. Another ill informed opinion Ok, pensions are NOT in a pot unless the are private pensions, the current workforce pay for pensions. If we split private pensions are safe as that's a deal.you did with a provider not the government. " Selective response. Savings and pensions will be in £GBP. Why would I be talking about state pension if I am talking about savings and pensions. I fully support the Sots rights to a referendum and to independence should they choose that road. It would however be a travesty if the Scots did not take on board the global implications of not having a currency union with the rUK. It won't happen, because it can't happen. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hope sense prevails and the Scots remain as part of the UK, as we're all better off together. I also can't wait for that smug t**t Alex Salmond to fade into obscurity...there aren't many people or situations that wind me up, but every time I hear his voice or see him spouting his inane drivel, it makes me want to puke. How someone like him can have been allowed to have wasted so much of other peoples money and resources on his own personal folly is beyond me." through democracy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? you tell me.... in scotland only 40% of people voted for the snp... and yet.... 60% are being governed by a party they didn't vote for! Don't be ridiculous. The majority of voters in Scotland voted SNP those who didn't vote can't complain. We use proportional representation in Scotland, so your point is moot, and ill informed. not true... want to get your figures right.. they got 44% of the popular vote... which ended up with them getting 54% of the parliamentary seats...... so... 56% of the popular vote did not vote for the snp... figures from the scotish election website.... I'll wait for my apology.... don't think I'll get one My figures are correct. The MAJORITY voted SNP. The rest either voted Labour, Lib Dem, Conservative or Green. Do you understand Roberts rules? Probably not so probably don't even understand democracy. My original point was simple. We as a nation overwhelmingly voted in favour of something different to what we got. So we are governed as part of the UK. This is what irks most of us and always has. No apology except that maybe I can cone across as something im not, I think of myself as British but Scottish too. I afford no ill will against anything or anyone" I get sick of the "What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for?" arguement... because it is only ever used when something doesn't go your way.... never heard it being used in the 3 elections beforehand when labour won.... or is that different????? its a case of using an arguement when it suits you.... oh I'm taking my ball home with me!!!! my point is.... if you are going to use it... then it needs to be applied evenly... at the moment its not... its called selective amnesia.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"@_abio We have a wee saying in Glasgow. "Dae yi? Aye" This is not about Labour or SNP or any other political party. This is about us not you so don't take it personally" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"@_abio We have a wee saying in Glasgow. "Dae yi? Aye" This is not about Labour or SNP or any other political party. This is about us not you so don't take it personally " and that is a lot of the selfish thinking of the scottish yes voters... it is not just all about you.... I live in the north east of england... and your "all about you" vote will have huge ramifications for us..... i'll give you an example..... one of the smallprint pledges is to possibly get off the "airplane emission tax"...... if that was to take place, you immediately crush newcastle and teeside airports... because airlines would likely take advantage to move flights to edinburgh and glasgow..... so you'll have to excuse me if your "all about you" attitude pisses off the rest of us..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just wish you stopped talking about it and just did it. Just remember when the going gets tough there will be no running back. Its always easier to solve problems with friends rather than on your own. Just a shame so many scot's are so gullible to Alex Salmond's false promises, he has represented his lying profession with honor. Alistair Darling was asked recently "If we will be better together after the vote, how come we are not better together now" He didn't have an answer" That type of question is great for the yes campaign but glosses over the real point. No one will EVER be content with how society is- we as a people in any country can always do more to tackle any inequalities be it social of financial so saying 'why are we not better together now' is such a low quality argument ....great for a soundbite but helpful to no one. Darling is in an impossible position to say the UK is all rosy as plenty of people are on the bread line and below....on this issue alone it's whether we can believe in an independent Scotland the poorest will be less poor in a yes vote. A gulf between rich and poor will always exists in any society so Darling is only ever pointing out he believes Alex salmond can't promise the Eutopia in the white paper because of the massive holes in his figures. (Fyi I'm still undecided- just a guy wanting facts, not political spin!) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is the problem ,I keep telling you they wont go ,they don't have the Balls. It's stuff like this that makes me hate politics. Comments about not having the balls are pointless, rude and uninformed. It's not about balls. I'm sick of the whole thing. Sick of the division it's caused, sick of the nastiness, sick of people talking about it from an emotional stance, sick of the patriotic viewpoint, sick of unanswered questions and I'm utterly sick of the egos involved. It's bullshit. Half the people voting have no idea what they're talking about. I've already heard of a postal vote being spoiled by a third party and landing back on the voters doormat. Whatever happens, I'd like to stop reading the utter bilge that it seems to encourage. I'd like an end to the thoughtless comments from those who don't know very much about it. I'd like to continue to live in the country I was born in without walking down the street being bothered by yes/no posters in windows. I don't want to come home to yes/no junk mail through my door when people are having to visit foodbanks and taxpayers money is wasted on shite that goes in the bin and I'd like people to be able to vote for what they choose, as is their right without being insulted. Debate is good when it's informed and doesn't get personal. Insulting others because of their choice is rude and ignorant. I'm off to do something else cause this soapbox is old and tired. Live and let live." Dirty girl is a clever Yes voter trying reverse psychology....I do have balls and to prove it I'm gonna vote yes to stick it to you lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......................... Again we are NOT voting for the SNP what don't you understand? And if you think this about anti English you are sorely mistaken. England is PART of a union, 4 countries, together. Typical absolutely typical Anglo egotistical attitude" If, IF, it's not about the SNP, why is Salmond's fizzog plastered across all the Yes campaign literature, at the launch of the Shite Paper and at the two main televised debates? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". i'll give you an example..... one of the smallprint pledges is to possibly get off the "airplane emission tax"...... if that was to take place, you immediately crush newcastle and teeside airports... because airlines would likely take advantage to move flights to edinburgh and glasgow..... so you'll have to excuse me if your "all about you" attitude pisses off the rest of us..... " And, surprise surprise, the SNP have just bought themselves an airport - at Prestwick. Coincidence? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"@_abio We have a wee saying in Glasgow. "Dae yi? Aye" This is not about Labour or SNP or any other political party. This is about us not you so don't take it personally and that is a lot of the selfish thinking of the scottish yes voters... it is not just all about you.... I live in the north east of england... and your "all about you" vote will have huge ramifications for us..... i'll give you an example..... one of the smallprint pledges is to possibly get off the "airplane emission tax"...... if that was to take place, you immediately crush newcastle and teeside airports... because airlines would likely take advantage to move flights to edinburgh and glasgow..... so you'll have to excuse me if your "all about you" attitude pisses off the rest of us..... " I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"......... so you'll have to excuse me if your "all about you" attitude pisses off the rest of us..... I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge?" No reason at all 'cept that if rUK were to decide to do the same, iScotland would come of second best - by a long way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge?" if they were truely independent... cool... by at the moment it looks as if they want all of the positives... without any of the negative consequences (i.e the lack of the currency union) they think they will get everything and lose nothing..... in the real world that ain't happening | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So its nearly time for us Scots to vote yes or no to independence and the polls are showing its going to be very close, whats the views on the rest of the UK,do you want us to leave,stay or not bothered." wouldn't say not bothered as such, as i have no input into the outcome so nothing i can do either way. but however it comes out, i wish the very best of luck all round and hope it works out for both the scots and the english | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just a shame so many scot's are so gullible to Alex Salmond's false promises, he has represented his lying profession with honor. Alistair Darling was asked recently "If we will be better together after the vote, how come we are not better together now" He didn't have an answer" I saw this too and it's very insulting to all the successful businesses, universities and everything that is so good about Scotland now. Why are you not better together now? We already are! The 8th biggest economy in the world!!!! The person who posed that question obviously hasn't travelled very much! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So its nearly time for us Scots to vote yes or no to independence and the polls are showing its going to be very close, whats the views on the rest of the UK,do you want us to leave,stay or not bothered." I am board with it board with the polls and it won't be close when it comes to it as people will bottle it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So its nearly time for us Scots to vote yes or no to independence and the polls are showing its going to be very close, whats the views on the rest of the UK,do you want us to leave,stay or not bothered. I am board with it board with the polls and it won't be close when it comes to it as people will bottle it. " bored you mean | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So its nearly time for us Scots to vote yes or no to independence and the polls are showing its going to be very close, whats the views on the rest of the UK,do you want us to leave,stay or not bothered. I am board with it board with the polls and it won't be close when it comes to it as people will bottle it. bored you mean" Well I did put fucked off up to the eyeballs with it all I have lost the will to live with the endless independence threads. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Dirty girl is a clever Yes voter trying reverse psychology....I do have balls and to prove it I'm gonna vote yes to stick it to you lol" You couldn't be more wrong. Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups. I'm a no voter because I believe we will be worse off alone for a number of reasons. My objection is to the vitriol that this whole campaign has caused. The insults. The comments about having no balls or no bottle. It's not about having no balls. It's about having a grown up debate that isn't personal but answers the questions asked honestly. I too wonder why we're not better together now. I'm just sick of the whole thing. People should be allowed to vote the way they choose for what's best for them. I don't want to be insulted because of my choice. Nor should you. I have no desire to sway anyone's choice by reverse psychology and quite frankly I'm unimpressed by the assumption. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Dirty girl is a clever Yes voter trying reverse psychology....I do have balls and to prove it I'm gonna vote yes to stick it to you lol You couldn't be more wrong. Assumption is the mother of all fuck ups. I'm a no voter because I believe we will be worse off alone for a number of reasons. My objection is to the vitriol that this whole campaign has caused. The insults. The comments about having no balls or no bottle. It's not about having no balls. It's about having a grown up debate that isn't personal but answers the questions asked honestly. I too wonder why we're not better together now. I'm just sick of the whole thing. People should be allowed to vote the way they choose for what's best for them. I don't want to be insulted because of my choice. Nor should you. I have no desire to sway anyone's choice by reverse psychology and quite frankly I'm unimpressed by the assumption. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As an English person I hope the Scottish people vote for what they believe is right. It's probably a once in a lifetime chance and, personally, I wouldn't want to live in a country ruled by another one. Oh hang on....Europe controls us! Bugger" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What's democratic about a whole country being governed by a political entity we did not vote for? you tell me.... in scotland only 40% of people voted for the snp... and yet.... 60% are being governed by a party they didn't vote for! Don't be ridiculous. The majority of voters in Scotland voted SNP those who didn't vote can't complain . We use proportional representation in Scotland, so your point is moot, and ill informed." I live in Scotland and didn't vote SNP.....not even as a last choice......therefore I didn't get who I voted for | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have just bought 2 scots pies and a bottle of buckfast is it todat we vote? *i Honestly have the pies n buckfast lolol" had one sip...i dunno if I can stomach this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just a shame so many scot's are so gullible to Alex Salmond's false promises, he has represented his lying profession with honor. Alistair Darling was asked recently "If we will be better together after the vote, how come we are not better together now" He didn't have an answer I saw this too and it's very insulting to all the successful businesses, universities and everything that is so good about Scotland now. Why are you not better together now? We already are! The 8th biggest economy in the world!!!! The person who posed that question obviously hasn't travelled very much!" this is only applicable if money/economics is the benchmark for better, many studies have shown that the UK is among the nations with the highest levels of inequality. so as always statistics can be used to prove anything you want them to, all thats required is to be selective in regards the data you rely on to reach a conclusion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just a shame so many scot's are so gullible to Alex Salmond's false promises, he has represented his lying profession with honor. Alistair Darling was asked recently "If we will be better together after the vote, how come we are not better together now" He didn't have an answer I saw this too and it's very insulting to all the successful businesses, universities and everything that is so good about Scotland now. Why are you not better together now? We already are! The 8th biggest economy in the world!!!! The person who posed that question obviously hasn't travelled very much!" I lived in Devon for 7 years, London for 2-3, I have travelled to the US, all over Europe, Vietnam, India, Thailand, Middle East. What's insulting is that you espouse opinions before actually having lived in someone's shoes. Have you ever lived in a Glasgow slum? If you've been here have you seen 3 miles either side of ANY city centre bar none and seen poverty in this country? Selfish? Im anything but. I am not anti English, Irish or Welsh im pro Scottish, hopefully we will treat each other like adults after the divorce of it happens | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge? if they were truely independent... cool... by at the moment it looks as if they want all of the positives... without any of the negative consequences (i.e the lack of the currency union) they think they will get everything and lose nothing..... in the real world that ain't happening" I appreciate the point you're making but isn't it normal to want all of the positives without the negatives? France and Germany are independent countries but share a currency. The pound is British not English. The Scots have as much right to it as the English or Welsh, that's the reality. There seems to have been a lot of scaremongering with regard the currency. I was speaking with a staunch euro-sceptic yesterday who was also a very vocal supporter of the NO vote. He refused to see any contradiction. I can understand why a Scot would want their country to be independent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the staunch facts are: if we win(the yes vote) it will be a national party and holiday.. if we dont(a no vote)..there will be a drink session(involving YES voters too) could be a few fights.. " There's always fights in glasgow anyway! Won't be different from a usual weekend | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the staunch facts are: if we win(the yes vote) it will be a national party and holiday.. if we dont(a no vote)..there will be a drink session(involving YES voters too) could be a few fights.. There's always fights in glasgow anyway! Won't be different from a usual weekend " we might shout FREEEEEDOM or INFREEEEEDOM | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the staunch facts are: if we win(the yes vote) it will be a national party and holiday.. if we dont(a no vote)..there will be a drink session(involving YES voters too) could be a few fights.. There's always fights in glasgow anyway! Won't be different from a usual weekend we might shout FREEEEEDOM or INFREEEEEDOM" remember your kilt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge? if they were truely independent... cool... by at the moment it looks as if they want all of the positives... without any of the negative consequences (i.e the lack of the currency union) they think they will get everything and lose nothing..... in the real world that ain't happening I appreciate the point you're making but isn't it normal to want all of the positives without the negatives? France and Germany are independent countries but share a currency. The pound is British not English. The Scots have as much right to it as the English or Welsh, that's the reality. There seems to have been a lot of scaremongering with regard the currency. I was speaking with a staunch euro-sceptic yesterday who was also a very vocal supporter of the NO vote. He refused to see any contradiction. I can understand why a Scot would want their country to be independent. " There is no scaremongering about the currency just facts laid out by the Governer of the Bank of England and the leaders of the three main political parties. It can't happen and the reason that it can't happen is because Scotland will be an independent country with more generous social welfare benefits AND allegedly a lower taxing state than rUK. We have all seen all too recently what has happened and is continuing to happen in the Eurozone with a shared currency but independent economic policies. Britain avoided joining the Euro zone and so no one in the UK is going to expose sterling to a similar fate as the Euro. If the Scots wish to compete with RUK by offering lower Corporation Tax and abolishing APD as well as offering free higher education, free prescriptions and a more generous welfare system ... Fine. But don't expect the lower taxes and higher spending to be supported by the currency of the country that you are competing against. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Had the SNP shown us over the last few years that they were credible leaders, I may have voted differently. They have been at the helm for years and could have been giving out all the stuff they are offering now. They have the worst ever minister for health, the NHS has no confidence in him, but they defeated a vote of no confidence because they have a majority......why would you trust them with the NHS when they don't listen to the people who work in it, but keep a minister who would rather be getting his picture taken, rather than dealing with the fact that there is wide spread neglect in our NHS leading to deaths... It's not just the NHS they prefer to fund fancy pavements, but the roads have huge potholes..it goes on and on.....if you disagree with them, you are mocked and called un patriotic ..... It's as much no supporters country" Vote Labour or Tory then, look at th NHS in the rest of the UK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge? if they were truely independent... cool... by at the moment it looks as if they want all of the positives... without any of the negative consequences (i.e the lack of the currency union) they think they will get everything and lose nothing..... in the real world that ain't happening I appreciate the point you're making but isn't it normal to want all of the positives without the negatives? France and Germany are independent countries but share a currency. The pound is British not English. The Scots have as much right to it as the English or Welsh, that's the reality. There seems to have been a lot of scaremongering with regard the currency. I was speaking with a staunch euro-sceptic yesterday who was also a very vocal supporter of the NO vote. He refused to see any contradiction. I can understand why a Scot would want their country to be independent. " the difference in that example is that france and germany both Agreed to share a currency... as it is in both their interests.... the currency union is certainly in Scotlands interest.... but as the governor of the BOE says, it may not be in the rUK best interest yep the pound is shared... but you can't expect them to say "we want to walk away from you because we don't feel treated right... oh by the way I want to keep the car, the house, the pets, all the cds ect ect ect....." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So its nearly time for us Scots to vote yes or no to independence and the polls are showing its going to be very close, whats the views on the rest of the UK,do you want us to leave,stay or not bothered." Not you Scots, that can vote though, as somewhere between 7 and 10% of those eligible to vote are not Scottish, whilst twice as many as that who are Scottish, but live in England, are not allowed to vote. And English people living in Scotland are also allowed to vote! Mad, really. I hope the Yes votes win. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge? if they were truely independent... cool... by at the moment it looks as if they want all of the positives... without any of the negative consequences (i.e the lack of the currency union) they think they will get everything and lose nothing..... in the real world that ain't happening I appreciate the point you're making but isn't it normal to want all of the positives without the negatives? France and Germany are independent countries but share a currency. The pound is British not English. The Scots have as much right to it as the English or Welsh, that's the reality. There seems to have been a lot of scaremongering with regard the currency. I was speaking with a staunch euro-sceptic yesterday who was also a very vocal supporter of the NO vote. He refused to see any contradiction. I can understand why a Scot would want their country to be independent. There is no scaremongering about the currency just facts laid out by the Governer of the Bank of England and the leaders of the three main political parties. It can't happen and the reason that it can't happen is because Scotland will be an independent country with more generous social welfare benefits AND allegedly a lower taxing state than rUK. We have all seen all too recently what has happened and is continuing to happen in the Eurozone with a shared currency but independent economic policies. Britain avoided joining the Euro zone and so no one in the UK is going to expose sterling to a similar fate as the Euro. If the Scots wish to compete with RUK by offering lower Corporation Tax and abolishing APD as well as offering free higher education, free prescriptions and a more generous welfare system ... Fine. But don't expect the lower taxes and higher spending to be supported by the currency of the country that you are competing against. " i'm not getting into the merits of a currency union, quite frankly because i'm fed up hearing both sides go round and round with the same repeated rhetoric. I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge? if they were truely independent... cool... by at the moment it looks as if they want all of the positives... without any of the negative consequences (i.e the lack of the currency union) they think they will get everything and lose nothing..... in the real world that ain't happening I appreciate the point you're making but isn't it normal to want all of the positives without the negatives? France and Germany are independent countries but share a currency. The pound is British not English. The Scots have as much right to it as the English or Welsh, that's the reality. There seems to have been a lot of scaremongering with regard the currency. I was speaking with a staunch euro-sceptic yesterday who was also a very vocal supporter of the NO vote. He refused to see any contradiction. I can understand why a Scot would want their country to be independent. There is no scaremongering about the currency just facts laid out by the Governer of the Bank of England and the leaders of the three main political parties. It can't happen and the reason that it can't happen is because Scotland will be an independent country with more generous social welfare benefits AND allegedly a lower taxing state than rUK. We have all seen all too recently what has happened and is continuing to happen in the Eurozone with a shared currency but independent economic policies. Britain avoided joining the Euro zone and so no one in the UK is going to expose sterling to a similar fate as the Euro. If the Scots wish to compete with RUK by offering lower Corporation Tax and abolishing APD as well as offering free higher education, free prescriptions and a more generous welfare system ... Fine. But don't expect the lower taxes and higher spending to be supported by the currency of the country that you are competing against. i'm not getting into the merits of a currency union, quite frankly because i'm fed up hearing both sides go round and round with the same repeated rhetoric. I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject." * wee typo there, should read, opt not to become part of ERM2 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You cant expect to get divorced and still hang on to the joint credit cards and bank account. If you really want to go it alone,then good luck and I hope it works out well. Just accept that leaving everything behind is exactly that,not cherry picking the best bits and running off to a greener field. Starting off a new life is expensive and bloody hard work." As an undecided voter can i give you how this is looking from my perspective, we have heard repeatedly via the media and the white paper that the Scottish government/yes campaign are seeking to negotiate a fair split of both the assets and liabilities of the UK if there is a yes vote. on the other hand we have had repeated statements from the UK government/Westminster parties/no campaign saying they will not negotiate over the UK assets and still expect Scotland to take a share of debts in accordance with Westminsters view on how to split the debt, again not a negotiation. I know which of those positions sounds most reasonable to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm a little confused by this, why wouldn't an independent country consider it's best interests? Why wouldn't it make decisions to increase it's competitive edge? if they were truely independent... cool... by at the moment it looks as if they want all of the positives... without any of the negative consequences (i.e the lack of the currency union) they think they will get everything and lose nothing..... in the real world that ain't happening I appreciate the point you're making but isn't it normal to want all of the positives without the negatives? France and Germany are independent countries but share a currency. The pound is British not English. The Scots have as much right to it as the English or Welsh, that's the reality. There seems to have been a lot of scaremongering with regard the currency. I was speaking with a staunch euro-sceptic yesterday who was also a very vocal supporter of the NO vote. He refused to see any contradiction. I can understand why a Scot would want their country to be independent. the difference in that example is that france and germany both Agreed to share a currency... as it is in both their interests.... the currency union is certainly in Scotlands interest.... but as the governor of the BOE says, it may not be in the rUK best interest yep the pound is shared... but you can't expect them to say "we want to walk away from you because we don't feel treated right... oh by the way I want to keep the car, the house, the pets, all the cds ect ect ect....."" Fabio, that's exactly what happens when you walk away. A negotiation takes place on how the assets and liabilities will be split or shared. The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. If Scotland agreed to leave the pound as well as leaving England to pick up the debt, Scotland would come out of this with the house the car and their favorite cd's. It's not going to happen. The scaremongering will go away and a hard reasoned negotiation will take place to reach acceptable middle ground for both sides. In effect we will most likely have two independent countries who 'Agreed to share a currency', as you put it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So its nearly time for us Scots to vote yes or no to independence and the polls are showing its going to be very close, whats the views on the rest of the UK,do you want us to leave,stay or not bothered. Not you Scots, that can vote though, as somewhere between 7 and 10% of those eligible to vote are not Scottish, whilst twice as many as that who are Scottish, but live in England, are not allowed to vote. And English people living in Scotland are also allowed to vote! Mad, really. I hope the Yes votes win. " This comes up again and again, the referendum is about Scotlands future not the future of Scottish people per se. why would someone who doesnt make their home in Scotland be eligible to cast a ballot here. We are each eligible to cast a ballot in the place we choose to make our home. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" i'm not getting into the merits of a currency union, quite frankly because i'm fed up hearing both sides go round and round with the same repeated rhetoric. I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject." I think you'll find that most of the countries that have the Euro, were they to be applying to have it now, would be ineligible. The Euro was, and still is, a common currency experiment on a hugely disastrous scale. It has ruined the weaker economies of Europe, whilst it has created ill will and feelings of discontent among the people of the stronger economies. The only way out of it will be for a common economic policy amongst all of the countries sharing the Euro, and that will eventually be driven and led by Germany, which is the only reason that the Germans are, at the moment, upholding the Euro. Keep the pound, but make it a Scottish Pound, funded and backed by a Scottish Bank, and not the Bank of England. Once again, I sincerely hope you get independence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" i'm not getting into the merits of a currency union, quite frankly because i'm fed up hearing both sides go round and round with the same repeated rhetoric. I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject. I think you'll find that most of the countries that have the Euro, were they to be applying to have it now, would be ineligible. The Euro was, and still is, a common currency experiment on a hugely disastrous scale. It has ruined the weaker economies of Europe, whilst it has created ill will and feelings of discontent among the people of the stronger economies. The only way out of it will be for a common economic policy amongst all of the countries sharing the Euro, and that will eventually be driven and led by Germany, which is the only reason that the Germans are, at the moment, upholding the Euro. Keep the pound, but make it a Scottish Pound, funded and backed by a Scottish Bank, and not the Bank of England. Once again, I sincerely hope you get independence." Which Scottish bank? Royal bank of Scotland.....bailed out and owned by tax payers of Britain? Bank of Scotland? Owned by lloyds Clydesdale Bank?.....owned by Bank of Austrailia ! We have no banks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject." see... this is half right... any new country wishing to join the EU doesn't have to sign up to the euro straight away..... and doesn't have to join the euro until all the criteria are met... however... once all the criteria are met, you have an obligation to join... no ifs or buts... the ERM2 opt out only applies to those countries (namely sweden, where it is in their constitution to have a referendum before any change can be made) who had associate status at the time the original agreement was signed... so not only does salmond thing he can get his way over currency union (which he cant) he thinks he can get his own way over EU entry...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... " That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You cant expect to get divorced and still hang on to the joint credit cards and bank account. If you really want to go it alone,then good luck and I hope it works out well. Just accept that leaving everything behind is exactly that,not cherry picking the best bits and running off to a greener field. Starting off a new life is expensive and bloody hard work. As an undecided voter can i give you how this is looking from my perspective, we have heard repeatedly via the media and the white paper that the Scottish government/yes campaign are seeking to negotiate a fair split of both the assets and liabilities of the UK if there is a yes vote. on the other hand we have had repeated statements from the UK government/Westminster parties/no campaign saying they will not negotiate over the UK assets and still expect Scotland to take a share of debts in accordance with Westminsters view on how to split the debt, again not a negotiation. I know which of those positions sounds most reasonable to me." It may sound reasons to you, but the hard reality is that the rUK electorate is firmly against any financial union with iScotland. Once Scotland votes YES then the rest of us will get to vote, its not going to happen. Scots Separatists want independence because the UK apparently doesn't listen to them - do they really think we are going to put their interests above the interests of our own populace? Currency Union is a fantasy sold by the SNP, it may not be the most important item on the menu to the Separatists but its non-negotiable to the wider UK and numbers are on our side. By all means vote YES (and i hope you do) but be under no illusions that we will defend OUR rights as vociferously as possible. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject. see... this is half right... any new country wishing to join the EU doesn't have to sign up to the euro straight away..... and doesn't have to join the euro until all the criteria are met... however... once all the criteria are met, you have an obligation to join... no ifs or buts... the ERM2 opt out only applies to those countries (namely sweden, where it is in their constitution to have a referendum before any change can be made) who had associate status at the time the original agreement was signed... so not only does salmond thing he can get his way over currency union (which he cant) he thinks he can get his own way over EU entry......" And that leads us into subjective ground Fabio, my understanding is that the ECB position is one of requiring new members of the EU to join ERM2 before gaining membership. which brings us to an unanswered question (unanswered largely due to the unwillingness of the UK gov to approach the EU and ask for clarification) as to whether Scotland would be considered by the EU to be a new member or if they would view it as a continuation of membership, and as there are no existing precedents, we are left going round and round with both sides repeating the same rhetoric over and over again. Which no use to anyone, except those who wish to prey on the electorates fear of uncertainty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" i'm not getting into the merits of a currency union, quite frankly because i'm fed up hearing both sides go round and round with the same repeated rhetoric. I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject. I think you'll find that most of the countries that have the Euro, were they to be applying to have it now, would be ineligible. The Euro was, and still is, a common currency experiment on a hugely disastrous scale. It has ruined the weaker economies of Europe, whilst it has created ill will and feelings of discontent among the people of the stronger economies. The only way out of it will be for a common economic policy amongst all of the countries sharing the Euro, and that will eventually be driven and led by Germany, which is the only reason that the Germans are, at the moment, upholding the Euro. Keep the pound, but make it a Scottish Pound, funded and backed by a Scottish Bank, and not the Bank of England. Once again, I sincerely hope you get independence. Which Scottish bank? Royal bank of Scotland.....bailed out and owned by tax payers of Britain? Bank of Scotland? Owned by lloyds Clydesdale Bank?.....owned by Bank of Austrailia ! We have no banks" Back your pound with the oil money 90 per cent of the yes voters are hoping for,Really cant see yes happening as far too many scots are on British benefits and will not put their faith into something they do not know will work | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You cant expect to get divorced and still hang on to the joint credit cards and bank account. If you really want to go it alone,then good luck and I hope it works out well. Just accept that leaving everything behind is exactly that,not cherry picking the best bits and running off to a greener field. Starting off a new life is expensive and bloody hard work. As an undecided voter can i give you how this is looking from my perspective, we have heard repeatedly via the media and the white paper that the Scottish government/yes campaign are seeking to negotiate a fair split of both the assets and liabilities of the UK if there is a yes vote. on the other hand we have had repeated statements from the UK government/Westminster parties/no campaign saying they will not negotiate over the UK assets and still expect Scotland to take a share of debts in accordance with Westminsters view on how to split the debt, again not a negotiation. I know which of those positions sounds most reasonable to me. It may sound reasons to you, but the hard reality is that the rUK electorate is firmly against any financial union with iScotland. Once Scotland votes YES then the rest of us will get to vote, its not going to happen. Scots Separatists want independence because the UK apparently doesn't listen to them - do they really think we are going to put their interests above the interests of our own populace? Currency Union is a fantasy sold by the SNP, it may not be the most important item on the menu to the Separatists but its non-negotiable to the wider UK and numbers are on our side. By all means vote YES (and i hope you do) but be under no illusions that we will defend OUR rights as vociferously as possible." and therein lies a major problem, one side who are willing to bring everything to the negotiating table, while the other is unwilling to do so. To me that sounds like one side behaving more reasonably than the other. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You cant expect to get divorced and still hang on to the joint credit cards and bank account. If you really want to go it alone,then good luck and I hope it works out well. Just accept that leaving everything behind is exactly that,not cherry picking the best bits and running off to a greener field. Starting off a new life is expensive and bloody hard work. As an undecided voter can i give you how this is looking from my perspective, we have heard repeatedly via the media and the white paper that the Scottish government/yes campaign are seeking to negotiate a fair split of both the assets and liabilities of the UK if there is a yes vote. on the other hand we have had repeated statements from the UK government/Westminster parties/no campaign saying they will not negotiate over the UK assets and still expect Scotland to take a share of debts in accordance with Westminsters view on how to split the debt, again not a negotiation. I know which of those positions sounds most reasonable to me. It may sound reasons to you, but the hard reality is that the rUK electorate is firmly against any financial union with iScotland. Once Scotland votes YES then the rest of us will get to vote, its not going to happen. Scots Separatists want independence because the UK apparently doesn't listen to them - do they really think we are going to put their interests above the interests of our own populace? Currency Union is a fantasy sold by the SNP, it may not be the most important item on the menu to the Separatists but its non-negotiable to the wider UK and numbers are on our side. By all means vote YES (and i hope you do) but be under no illusions that we will defend OUR rights as vociferously as possible. and therein lies a major problem, one side who are willing to bring everything to the negotiating table, while the other is unwilling to do so. To me that sounds like one side behaving more reasonably than the other." And one side believing they can cherry pick whatever they want whilst the other side roll over. Make no mistake, we will demand our representatives get the very best deal from any negotiations - we expect no less. We are under no obligation to damage our own interests in the interest of a foreign state. The referendum may be all about you - the next stage will be all about the rest of us. Its not just Scotland that that can play hardball. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" i'm not getting into the merits of a currency union, quite frankly because i'm fed up hearing both sides go round and round with the same repeated rhetoric. I will however make comment regarding the Euro, firstly the UK media and politicians have managed to spin our non-membership, the reality is we CANNOT join the Euro because we are incapable of meeting the conditions of membership. And as far as the nonsense that is being bandied about that Scotland will need to join the Euro to gain EU membership, all any nation has to do is opt to become a part of ERM2 (a voluntary decision for each nation) and they would remain outwith the Euro. Its there in black and white, (available via the tinternet) if you choose to research the subject. I think you'll find that most of the countries that have the Euro, were they to be applying to have it now, would be ineligible. The Euro was, and still is, a common currency experiment on a hugely disastrous scale. It has ruined the weaker economies of Europe, whilst it has created ill will and feelings of discontent among the people of the stronger economies. The only way out of it will be for a common economic policy amongst all of the countries sharing the Euro, and that will eventually be driven and led by Germany, which is the only reason that the Germans are, at the moment, upholding the Euro. Keep the pound, but make it a Scottish Pound, funded and backed by a Scottish Bank, and not the Bank of England. Once again, I sincerely hope you get independence. Which Scottish bank? Royal bank of Scotland.....bailed out and owned by tax payers of Britain? Bank of Scotland? Owned by lloyds Clydesdale Bank?.....owned by Bank of Austrailia ! We have no banks" Neither did any other country that became independent. You will be independent, with your own government, so set your own bank up, with your own currency, and your own fiscal policies. Or is that beyond Scotland to do? Please, please, please, vote yes! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You cant expect to get divorced and still hang on to the joint credit cards and bank account. If you really want to go it alone,then good luck and I hope it works out well. Just accept that leaving everything behind is exactly that,not cherry picking the best bits and running off to a greener field. Starting off a new life is expensive and bloody hard work. As an undecided voter can i give you how this is looking from my perspective, we have heard repeatedly via the media and the white paper that the Scottish government/yes campaign are seeking to negotiate a fair split of both the assets and liabilities of the UK if there is a yes vote. on the other hand we have had repeated statements from the UK government/Westminster parties/no campaign saying they will not negotiate over the UK assets and still expect Scotland to take a share of debts in accordance with Westminsters view on how to split the debt, again not a negotiation. I know which of those positions sounds most reasonable to me. It may sound reasons to you, but the hard reality is that the rUK electorate is firmly against any financial union with iScotland. Once Scotland votes YES then the rest of us will get to vote, its not going to happen. Scots Separatists want independence because the UK apparently doesn't listen to them - do they really think we are going to put their interests above the interests of our own populace? Currency Union is a fantasy sold by the SNP, it may not be the most important item on the menu to the Separatists but its non-negotiable to the wider UK and numbers are on our side. By all means vote YES (and i hope you do) but be under no illusions that we will defend OUR rights as vociferously as possible. and therein lies a major problem, one side who are willing to bring everything to the negotiating table, while the other is unwilling to do so. To me that sounds like one side behaving more reasonably than the other. And one side believing they can cherry pick whatever they want whilst the other side roll over. Make no mistake, we will demand our representatives get the very best deal from any negotiations - we expect no less. We are under no obligation to damage our own interests in the interest of a foreign state. The referendum may be all about you - the next stage will be all about the rest of us. Its not just Scotland that that can play hardball." oh ffs stop buying into this nonsense about cherry picking and think the yes campaign have said they are willing to negotiate over everything, let me repeat that .....everything..... yet you still think thats cherry picking !! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE." Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Btw, even third world Cambodia uses the US dollar, alongside its own & the EU would welcome any country with wealth in resources with open arms. All this scaremongery from Westminster can only be for one reason, after all, it's not as if they've given a flying you know what about Scotland in the past, is it? They've even neglected their own people throughout their history!! Open your eyes, Scotland, whilst you still have the chance!!" James, what Cambodia chooses as the best thing for them has no bearing on what is best for Scotland, the two countries have different circumstances. making comparisons like these are invalid and simply create more fluff to confuse people and in some cases create more division. Theres been more than enough of that already, so best to stick with reasoned posts regarding Scotland/UK. only my opinion of course. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The only friends of mine banging on about it on Facebook are English living up there... I do think that the referendum should have been extended to all of the UK...After all, we were supposed to be a union and the last time I looked, union would suggest more than one entity" and would you extend that same principle regarding the in/out referendum on the EU ? after all that will affect people in Germany, France etc who are all part of that union, so surely they would get a vote in that referendum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. " Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things." That's correct and as far as I know it would be Scottish Sterling or what ever the chosen name would be and its value wouldn't be tied to UK Stirling its value would float independently against other currencies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Btw, even third world Cambodia uses the US dollar, alongside its own & the EU would welcome any country with wealth in resources with open arms. All this scaremongery from Westminster can only be for one reason, after all, it's not as if they've given a flying you know what about Scotland in the past, is it? They've even neglected their own people throughout their history!! Open your eyes, Scotland, whilst you still have the chance!! James, what Cambodia chooses as the best thing for them has no bearing on what is best for Scotland, the two countries have different circumstances. making comparisons like these are invalid and simply create more fluff to confuse people and in some cases create more division. Theres been more than enough of that already, so best to stick with reasoned posts regarding Scotland/UK. only my opinion of course." Only my opinion also, but said with a pinch of jest, I'll admit! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. That's correct and as far as I know it would be Scottish Sterling or what ever the chosen name would be and its value wouldn't be tied to UK Stirling its value would float independently against other currencies. " Who would back this Scottish Sterling? Would there be a guarantee (currently £85,000) if a 'Scottish' bank goes bust ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things." Indeed. The scary thing is that 16 year olds in Scotland are being asked to vote on this and by the fact of their birth date, they are unlikely to comprehend the difference. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. That's correct and as far as I know it would be Scottish Sterling or what ever the chosen name would be and its value wouldn't be tied to UK Stirling its value would float independently against other currencies. Who would back this Scottish Sterling? Would there be a guarantee (currently £85,000) if a 'Scottish' bank goes bust ?" That's a problem for Scotland. Should UK investors & taxpayers be responsible for refunding Scottish account holders in the event of Scottish bank going bust? I think not. Some people have a very strange idea of what independence actually entails. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. That's correct and as far as I know it would be Scottish Sterling or what ever the chosen name would be and its value wouldn't be tied to UK Stirling its value would float independently against other currencies. Who would back this Scottish Sterling? Would there be a guarantee (currently £85,000) if a 'Scottish' bank goes bust ? That's a problem for Scotland. Should UK investors & taxpayers be responsible for refunding Scottish account holders in the event of Scottish bank going bust? I think not. Some people have a very strange idea of what independence actually entails." It's also why firms like Standard Life and Scottish Widows (amongst others) have contingency plans to relocate to south of the border. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. Indeed. The scary thing is that 16 year olds in Scotland are being asked to vote on this and by the fact of their birth date, they are unlikely to comprehend the difference." perhaps you should come up and experience for yourself just how engaged and knowledgeable they are instead of making assumptions, which to be honest are pretty damn disrespectful towards the many teenagers who are more switched on than most adults are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. That's correct and as far as I know it would be Scottish Sterling or what ever the chosen name would be and its value wouldn't be tied to UK Stirling its value would float independently against other currencies. Who would back this Scottish Sterling? Would there be a guarantee (currently £85,000) if a 'Scottish' bank goes bust ? That's a problem for Scotland. Should UK investors & taxpayers be responsible for refunding Scottish account holders in the event of Scottish bank going bust? I think not. Some people have a very strange idea of what independence actually entails." An opinion i share with you Sara, an independent Scotland using sterling would need to make it's own arrangements in this regard. I believe this is what the Isle of Mann, Channel Islands and Gibraltar do at the current time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From what i understand, the youth vote is strongly towards a NO vote. Strangely enough." im not so sure, ITV news filmed at my college last week and despite recording opinions from both yes and no supporters they only broadcast the interviews with the no supporters. So between that and some other things i am aware of i am a bit sceptical about the stats in this regard. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. Indeed. The scary thing is that 16 year olds in Scotland are being asked to vote on this and by the fact of their birth date, they are unlikely to comprehend the difference. perhaps you should come up and experience for yourself just how engaged and knowledgeable they are instead of making assumptions, which to be honest are pretty damn disrespectful towards the many teenagers who are more switched on than most adults are. " A 16 year old in any country in the world has not had life experience and that is just a fact. If you are telling me that your average 16 year old in Scotland has a mature grasp of economics (which is after all only a minority A level choice, or something that you pick up through life experience and maturity) - then I think that Scotland is going to do just fine as an independent country. I actually think that you are wrong simply based on the law of averages and the motivation for Salmond reducing the voting age. It is easier to motivate the poorly educated to vote for radical change than it is to convince a more educated person to buy the same story. Hence both sides are targeting the lower end of the demographic scale. The Nationalists are suggesting that the lives of the poor and the disenfranchised will be better if they vote for independence whereas the No parties are suggesting that they will be better off staying together. Intelligent people will add up the pros and cons and make a mature judgment. The poorly educated and those lacking true awareness will vote for who makes the best sales pitch. That is just the way it is in every election. Salmond has gambled that the lack of economic maturity of the 16-18 year old would make them a good target to vote for change. Dress it up how you will but it is true because the currency question is still not yet answered - by anyone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. Indeed. The scary thing is that 16 year olds in Scotland are being asked to vote on this and by the fact of their birth date, they are unlikely to comprehend the difference." And if you think that's scary, imagine trying to convince 16 year olds to join the army & get blown up or blow someone else up by using laughable advertising campaigns? Now, what kind of arseholes could even consider treating their own people like that? Some of the NO arguments really are sounding desperate, to say the least!! ......& I think I know why. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. Indeed. The scary thing is that 16 year olds in Scotland are being asked to vote on this and by the fact of their birth date, they are unlikely to comprehend the difference. perhaps you should come up and experience for yourself just how engaged and knowledgeable they are instead of making assumptions, which to be honest are pretty damn disrespectful towards the many teenagers who are more switched on than most adults are. A 16 year old in any country in the world has not had life experience and that is just a fact. If you are telling me that your average 16 year old in Scotland has a mature grasp of economics (which is after all only a minority A level choice, or something that you pick up through life experience and maturity) - then I think that Scotland is going to do just fine as an independent country. I actually think that you are wrong simply based on the law of averages and the motivation for Salmond reducing the voting age. It is easier to motivate the poorly educated to vote for radical change than it is to convince a more educated person to buy the same story. Hence both sides are targeting the lower end of the demographic scale. The Nationalists are suggesting that the lives of the poor and the disenfranchised will be better if they vote for independence whereas the No parties are suggesting that they will be better off staying together. Intelligent people will add up the pros and cons and make a mature judgment. The poorly educated and those lacking true awareness will vote for who makes the best sales pitch. That is just the way it is in every election. Salmond has gambled that the lack of economic maturity of the 16-18 year old would make them a good target to vote for change. Dress it up how you will but it is true because the currency question is still not yet answered - by anyone." you can get married and have children at 16 in scotland, so why shouldn't a young family have the right to vote. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. Not true I'm afraid. rUK has already promised to honour the debt - which cannot be divided in any case. iScotland is indeed free to use Sterling as a currency, it just won't have the BoE backing up her fiscal and monetary policies. Should iScotland embark on a course of independence without the security of either a central bank or a lender of last resort then - as a senior eurocrat said this week - she will find entering the EU rather difficult. Using Sterling as a currency and actual Currency Union are two very different things. Indeed. The scary thing is that 16 year olds in Scotland are being asked to vote on this and by the fact of their birth date, they are unlikely to comprehend the difference. perhaps you should come up and experience for yourself just how engaged and knowledgeable they are instead of making assumptions, which to be honest are pretty damn disrespectful towards the many teenagers who are more switched on than most adults are. A 16 year old in any country in the world has not had life experience and that is just a fact. If you are telling me that your average 16 year old in Scotland has a mature grasp of economics (which is after all only a minority A level choice, or something that you pick up through life experience and maturity) - then I think that Scotland is going to do just fine as an independent country. I actually think that you are wrong simply based on the law of averages and the motivation for Salmond reducing the voting age. It is easier to motivate the poorly educated to vote for radical change than it is to convince a more educated person to buy the same story. Hence both sides are targeting the lower end of the demographic scale. The Nationalists are suggesting that the lives of the poor and the disenfranchised will be better if they vote for independence whereas the No parties are suggesting that they will be better off staying together. Intelligent people will add up the pros and cons and make a mature judgment. The poorly educated and those lacking true awareness will vote for who makes the best sales pitch. That is just the way it is in every election. Salmond has gambled that the lack of economic maturity of the 16-18 year old would make them a good target to vote for change. Dress it up how you will but it is true because the currency question is still not yet answered - by anyone." given that there are just as many uneducated, disenfranchised and poor 26, 36, 46, 56 year olds your assumption that 16 year olds would be "unlikely to comprehend" becomes moot. In addition regarding economics, the younger members of the Scottish population are more likely to have an understanding than my generation are as it is more widely taught in schools up here now than in the past. Something which has shown itself to be the case in economics classes that have been part of my studies in the last couple of years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"" very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its a one way ticket to god knows where. I,m not a gambler, I,ll stay with the UK." your gambling either way | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error " hypocritical? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error hypocritical?" common sense ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error hypocritical?common sense !" So we have a lot to offer but it makes more sense doing it as a brit instead of a scot? i also find that patronising | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error hypocritical?common sense !So we have a lot to offer but it makes more sense doing it as a brit instead of a scot? i also find that patronising " its not meant to be as an example the many cultures of America make it work you don't need to lose identity just pull together as one nation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error hypocritical?common sense !So we have a lot to offer but it makes more sense doing it as a brit instead of a scot? i also find that patronising its not meant to be as an example the many cultures of America make it work you don't need to lose identity just pull together as one nation " As a yes voter i don't want to be part of the masses. the way i see it is, my voice has more chance to be heard among 5 million Scottish people than it does 70 million British | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" ....The UK has an enormous debt, the deficit means it's still growing. England cannot afford to let Scotland walk away from the debt. ...... That's where you're wrong. 'England' (the rest of the UK) CAN afford to let Scotland walk away and has guaranteed Scotland's share should it do so. It can do this because it has a long established internationally traded currency, backed by a trusted central bank with the ability to print money via QE. Do you not understand that the pound belongs as much to Scotland as England? England cannot force Scotland to stop using the pound, Scotland cannot just walk away from the debt. The 'guarantee' you speak of is an agreement that under a successful currency resolution with the rest of the UK, an independent Scotland would take on a certain amount of the debt. England cannot afford for Scotland to walk away from the currency and therefore the debt. Don't forget, although it's called the Bank of England, it is actually the Bank of the UK. England doesn't own the UK. " And when Scotland becomes independent, then it ceases to be a part of the UK..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error hypocritical?common sense !So we have a lot to offer but it makes more sense doing it as a brit instead of a scot? i also find that patronising its not meant to be as an example the many cultures of America make it work you don't need to lose identity just pull together as one nation As a yes voter i don't want to be part of the masses. the way i see it is, my voice has more chance to be heard among 5 million Scottish people than it does 70 million British " ok you run with 50 per cent taxation and increased prescription and health charges and even that won't make you viable as a nation that's economical fact | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If I were Scottish I would be worried about how the interest on my mortgage would be calculated. If independence does come, there is an independent Scottish pound and its value drops even by say only 10% and your lender is English then you will be paying a lot more for in repayments. It will go for other imports and food stuffs. I think there hasn't been enough clarity on all these issues from the politicians and some of the misinformation is positively criminal. " Here's a thought, we owe banks money that are as you say English but not British as they are now, you reject currency sharing mind you and say "you walked away" that means no sharing of deficit cos we sure as hell ain't sharing that alone. So, how.you gonna get your money as an "English" bank has no legal jurisdictional rights in a foreign country? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Political rhetoric aside. Scotland has the capability to.stand alone as a nation, we are capable of overcoming and challenges we face, written are capable of negotiations with any future parties that will serve both well. We have a once in a lifetime opportunity. I for one have fears and uncertainty, but I also know that I have the courage to face my fears. We have a chance to say "We may not be the nation we want to be but thank God we are not the nation we used to be"very good post and we certainly would nt want to see you leave you have so much to offer but we are a little bored by some scots arrogance you are better off as part of a uk so pleases don't make a grave error hypocritical?common sense !So we have a lot to offer but it makes more sense doing it as a brit instead of a scot? i also find that patronising its not meant to be as an example the many cultures of America make it work you don't need to lose identity just pull together as one nation As a yes voter i don't want to be part of the masses. the way i see it is, my voice has more chance to be heard among 5 million Scottish people than it does 70 million British ok you run with 50 per cent taxation and increased prescription and health charges and even that won't make you viable as a nation that's economical fact " pulling figures and percentages out of thin air and putting the word fact at the end of it doesn't make it so. even wishing them as i suspect you are, still doesn't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |