 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Exercise programme:
Take one Weetabix.
Take an Aero chocolate bar.
Crumble the Aero over the Weetabix.
Voila. Aerobix."
You crack me up man! How do you come up with all this.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
Actually, I do think it is partly about being able to get the pack calorie levels to be comparable to the "healthy" snack bars. When I see a two finger KitKat is 111 calories (something like that, I can't remember the exact figure) and I see a health bar is 120 calories it makes it easier to justify the KitKat. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Actually, I do think it is partly about being able to get the pack calorie levels to be comparable to the "healthy" snack bars. When I see a two finger KitKat is 111 calories (something like that, I can't remember the exact figure) and I see a health bar is 120 calories it makes it easier to justify the KitKat."
Kitkats probably have less salt and sugar than a 'healthy' bar.
Another reason to have a kitkat..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Actually, I do think it is partly about being able to get the pack calorie levels to be comparable to the "healthy" snack bars. When I see a two finger KitKat is 111 calories (something like that, I can't remember the exact figure) and I see a health bar is 120 calories it makes it easier to justify the KitKat."
this is true |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Actually, I do think it is partly about being able to get the pack calorie levels to be comparable to the "healthy" snack bars. When I see a two finger KitKat is 111 calories (something like that, I can't remember the exact figure) and I see a health bar is 120 calories it makes it easier to justify the KitKat."
This was a trick that Walkers pulled with their lower fat crisps. They were infact exactly the same crisps as their normal packs they just put less in. Two or three grams if memory serves. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"Companies shrink the volumes of their food by so many grams to increase profits on the unsuspecting public by still charging the same amount when it used to be larger.  "
There is that too. It's a win win for them on all grounds to offer less, charge the same and get the healthier sticker on them too.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Companies shrink the volumes of their food by so many grams to increase profits on the unsuspecting public by still charging the same amount when it used to be larger.
There is that too. It's a win win for them on all grounds to offer less, charge the same and get the healthier sticker on them too.
"
bloody bastards! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
