Im not sure. If we had grown up together closely then probably not, but if we were more distant and no children could be conceived, somehow I dont rule it fully out. Will probably get shot down for this though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In the UK, it is perfectly legal to marry your first cousin. My ex's youngest son has 2 perfectly healthy kids with his cousin.
This is not something I would remotely consider though  "
Due to the practice of many immigrant Muslim communities of going back home marrying cousins and bringing them back here we're seeing a very significant rise in sever genetic disorders because of the inbreeding.
In an isolated case it may not be an issue but as it grows there are more and more carriers and especially in closed communities they are more likely to pair up and produce children who are full sufferers |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
In April 2002, the Journal of Genetic Counseling released a report which estimated the average risk of birth defects in a child born of first cousins at 1.7–2.8% over an average base risk for non-cousin couples of 3%, or about the same as that of any woman over age 40. In terms of mortality, a 1994 study found a mean excess pre-reproductive mortality rate of 4.4%, while another study published in 2009 suggests the rate may be closer to 3.5%. Put differently, first-cousin marriage entails a similar increased risk of birth defects and mortality as a woman faces when she gives birth at age 41 rather than at 30. Critics argue that banning first-cousin marriages would make as much sense as trying to ban childbearing by older women. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *londeCazWoman
over a year ago
Arse End of the Universe, Cumbria |
Whilst I can appreciate that my first cousins are good looking lads and lasses, we were bought up very closely so no...I've a big extended family though or second cousins and cousins removed etc. and those may be possibles...
It's pretty hard not to shag someone round here who isn't related in some way  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whilst I can appreciate that my first cousins are good looking lads and lasses, we were bought up very closely so no...I've a big extended family though or second cousins and cousins removed etc. and those may be possibles...
It's pretty hard not to shag someone round here who isn't related in some way "
I can hear duel of the Banjos in the background 
Gimp |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *londeCazWoman
over a year ago
Arse End of the Universe, Cumbria |
"Whilst I can appreciate that my first cousins are good looking lads and lasses, we were bought up very closely so no...I've a big extended family though or second cousins and cousins removed etc. and those may be possibles...
It's pretty hard not to shag someone round here who isn't related in some way
I can hear duel of the Banjos in the background
Gimp"
I could probably make you squeal like a pig, Gimpy  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whilst I can appreciate that my first cousins are good looking lads and lasses, we were bought up very closely so no...I've a big extended family though or second cousins and cousins removed etc. and those may be possibles...
It's pretty hard not to shag someone round here who isn't related in some way
I can hear duel of the Banjos in the background
Gimp
I could probably make you squeal like a pig, Gimpy "
well ride me like ya stole me biaaatch
Gimp |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No I wouldn't. I'm close to my 1st cousins, not in that way though !
I've come across a 2nd cousin on a different site a couple of years ago - I told him I knew who he was , never revealed who I was. I always smile to myself when I bump him into now.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
[quote:]In April 2002, the Journal of Genetic Counseling released a report which estimated the average risk of birth defects in a child born of first cousins at 1.7–2.8% over an average base risk for non-cousin couples of 3%, or about the same as that of any woman over age 40. In terms of mortality, a 1994 study found a mean excess pre-reproductive mortality rate of 4.4%, while another study published in 2009 suggests the rate may be closer to 3.5%.
Put differently, first-cousin marriage entails a similar increased risk of birth defects and mortality as a woman faces when she gives birth at age 41 rather than at 30.
Critics argue that banning first-cousin marriages would make as much sense as trying to ban childbearing by older women.[:/quote]
I wouldn't... That made interesting reading though. Thanks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"In the UK, it is perfectly legal to marry your first cousin. My ex's youngest son has 2 perfectly healthy kids with his cousin.
This is not something I would remotely consider though
Due to the practice of many immigrant Muslim communities of going back home marrying cousins and bringing them back here we're seeing a very significant rise in sever genetic disorders because of the inbreeding.
In an isolated case it may not be an issue but as it grows there are more and more carriers and especially in closed communities they are more likely to pair up and produce children who are full sufferers"
And obviously you have evidence of this? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
So two brothers are both homosexuals .morally what is the harm if they want sex
In vanilla world the euk factor in many topics overrides rational thought. One might think that people who are not so vanilla would have a more open philosophical view ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If your looking to breed a mongrel like the Royal family then yes but i gotta say NO! It definitely wouldn't be my cuppa tea shagging a family member weather there 1st 2nd or 6th cousins its not normal behavior  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So two brothers are both homosexuals .morally what is the harm if they want sex
In vanilla world the euk factor in many topics overrides rational thought. One might think that people who are not so vanilla would have a more open philosophical view ?
"
morals are as individual it seems , as many things ... So two brothers? Mum n daughter, Dad n son? In my opinion morally it is a big fat No No! Ps... Swingers have morals too! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So two brothers are both homosexuals .morally what is the harm if they want sex
In vanilla world the euk factor in many topics overrides rational thought. One might think that people who are not so vanilla would have a more open philosophical view ?
morals are as individual it seems , as many things ... So two brothers? Mum n daughter, Dad n son? In my opinion morally it is a big fat No No! Ps... Swingers have morals too! "
Now that's a euk factor rejection. Now try to articulate a rational valid reason beyond it makes you uncomfortable ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So two brothers are both homosexuals .morally what is the harm if they want sex
In vanilla world the euk factor in many topics overrides rational thought. One might think that people who are not so vanilla would have a more open philosophical view ?
morals are as individual it seems , as many things ... So two brothers? Mum n daughter, Dad n son? In my opinion morally it is a big fat No No! Ps... Swingers have morals too!
Now that's a euk factor rejection. Now try to articulate a rational valid reason beyond it makes you uncomfortable ?
"
have said All I need to on the matter thank you! If that is not articulate or rational enough for you ... then so be it! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So two brothers are both homosexuals .morally what is the harm if they want sex
In vanilla world the euk factor in many topics overrides rational thought. One might think that people who are not so vanilla would have a more open philosophical view ?
morals are as individual it seems , as many things ... So two brothers? Mum n daughter, Dad n son? In my opinion morally it is a big fat No No! Ps... Swingers have morals too!
Now that's a euk factor rejection. Now try to articulate a rational valid reason beyond it makes you uncomfortable ?
have said All I need to on the matter thank you! If that is not articulate or rational enough for you ... then so be it! "
My tone was at fault x
I absolutely did not mean anyone should or must explain themselves on here . It was meant as an open thought experiment to illustrate that as humans we can form strong opinions yet not be able to rationalise why people do this when making race comments and gay sex comments
Some humans think putting a willy in a man's bum is euk although entitled to their opinion in a debate upon the ethics of gay sex " just does not seem right " is not very constructive to forwarding the discussion .
I genuinely did not mean explain or go away lol only to examine what is behind the opinion . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So two brothers are both homosexuals .morally what is the harm if they want sex
In vanilla world the euk factor in many topics overrides rational thought. One might think that people who are not so vanilla would have a more open philosophical view ?
morals are as individual it seems , as many things ... So two brothers? Mum n daughter, Dad n son? In my opinion morally it is a big fat No No! Ps... Swingers have morals too!
Now that's a euk factor rejection. Now try to articulate a rational valid reason beyond it makes you uncomfortable ?
have said All I need to on the matter thank you! If that is not articulate or rational enough for you ... then so be it!
My tone was at fault x
I absolutely did not mean anyone should or must explain themselves on here . It was meant as an open thought experiment to illustrate that as humans we can form strong opinions yet not be able to rationalise why people do this when making race comments and gay sex comments
Some humans think putting a willy in a man's bum is euk although entitled to their opinion in a debate upon the ethics of gay sex " just does not seem right " is not very constructive to forwarding the discussion .
I genuinely did not mean explain or go away lol only to examine what is behind the opinion ."
yeap your tone was pants! so here goes , with situations be it race, sexuality etc, peoples perception and opinions change.. For some things this has taken many years. Now on the subject of incest or family members having sex . I can only give my own opinion . That is : its morally wrong on so many levels. If we are talking off spring there are serious generic/ genetic problems and inter breeding is not obviously natural , in as much as genetically it is not compatable, and this is shown in very cruel ways .
Then one could mention the devestation to families, that are ripped apart by such relationships. You originally quoted two gay brothers having sex? There is nothing wrong with two brothers in a family being gay... Having sex with each other tho in my mind is moraly wrong ( tho no babies to consider, the emotional problems that would cause those concerned in it , plus the extended family could be awfull) in my opinion being gay is irelevant ,as any sibling sex is a no no.
In conclusion, simply there are unwritten rules that us as human beings are taught and i feel also , are intuativly within us all. It is in built from our very being. Nature itself shows that, in the children born to such relationships. Sexual relationships with family members are for me ,morally , naturally and emotionally wrong .. Sure that explains a bit more?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What If you went to a social or a gangbang. And your cousin was there ? Maybe a female cousin and she was the lady getting ganged what would you do ?? "
well I wouldn't have sex with her!  would you? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What If you went to a social or a gangbang. And your cousin was there ? Maybe a female cousin and she was the lady getting ganged what would you do ?? "
if it was a social id buy them a drink if i turned up for a gang bang and my cousin was one of the guys one of us would be leaving |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Morality is cultural one person good behavior can be someone else bad.
I can see 2 people getting together not knowing they are cousins from maybe 5th upward generation because by then you could have 50 cousins. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Morality is cultural one person good behavior can be someone else bad.
I can see 2 people getting together not knowing they are cousins from maybe 5th upward generation because by then you could have 50 cousins."
is there not a difference of that happening without knowing.. And it happening when both/all fully awear? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By * Jay69Man
over a year ago
Bridgwater - Somerset |
A few have claimed it is 'not natural'
In the animal kingdom it is very natural.
Genetically it reinforces 'good' or pro survival traits and reinforces and s out the negative traits.
Would have been quite common in small communities throughout history.
Not saying it's a good idea in modern society, but the revulsion is a recent cultural phenomenon. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A few have claimed it is 'not natural'
In the animal kingdom it is very natural.
Genetically it reinforces 'good' or pro survival traits and reinforces and s out the negative traits.
Would have been quite common in small communities throughout history.
Not saying it's a good idea in modern society, but the revulsion is a recent cultural phenomenon."
Inbreeding has a negative effect rather than positive it leads to birth defects and other issues including ones like 12 toes. But what ever floats your boat.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By * Jay69Man
over a year ago
Bridgwater - Somerset |
"A few have claimed it is 'not natural'
In the animal kingdom it is very natural.
Genetically it reinforces 'good' or pro survival traits and reinforces and s out the negative traits.
Would have been quite common in small communities throughout history.
Not saying it's a good idea in modern society, but the revulsion is a recent cultural phenomenon.
Inbreeding has a negative effect rather than positive it leads to birth defects and other issues including ones like 12 toes. But what ever floats your boat. "
Point I didn't quite make is that with natural selection / survival of the fittest, the failures are culled by a harsh natural environment - as are the failures in animal breeding programs. Breed relatives together where both have the qualities you want, kill the failures breed from the sucesses. Well known practice (not saying it's a nice or a good thing).
In the past haemophiliacs (unless pampered royalty) would generally not have survived to breed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
