FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > United We Stand? Independent Scotland a Good or Bad Idea 3
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is a favorite topic here, so I am doing part 3 lol ." an excellent topic and a really good, well mannered debate, dont fully understand it all but learning quickly. please keep it nice though guys as it has been so far | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is a favorite topic here, so I am doing part 3 lol . an excellent topic and a really good, well mannered debate, dont fully understand it all but learning quickly. please keep it nice though guys as it has been so far " Yes your right ther its quite fun subject as well, but fun to debate as well . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find the most amusing part of this thread regarding the EU. A certain person on previous threads (mentioning no names) seems to think that it will be no problem to re- join the EU and his/her argument is solely based on Independent Scotland. Bear in mind the UK is part of the EU and many people want out for reason of control! So my question - Why oh why would Scotland want to leave the UK only to join the EU and be partly controlled by Brussels?? Not very independent is it?? " well to quote myself from the previous threads, i feel i dont have enough knowledge on the subject to be able to make an informed comment. so for that reason, i will keep quiet(ish) and read intently both sides of the debate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find the most amusing part of this thread regarding the EU. A certain person on previous threads (mentioning no names) seems to think that it will be no problem to re- join the EU and his/her argument is solely based on Independent Scotland. Bear in mind the UK is part of the EU and many people want out for reason of control! So my question - Why oh why would Scotland want to leave the UK only to join the EU and be partly controlled by Brussels?? Not very independent is it?? " To be honest I believe that there are those north of the border who see independence as an instrument to reduce outgoings by dispensing with the need to pay for defense and border policing (passing those costs to what remains of the UK) while passing the costs of infrastructure investment to the EU (regional grants etc.). However unfortunately for them I see the international carpetbaggers (sorry merchant bankers) sharpening their sharky nashers and preparing for a feeding frenzy that the UK and EU will sit back and watch with a certain "I told you so" smugness. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find the most amusing part of this thread regarding the EU. A certain person on previous threads (mentioning no names) seems to think that it will be no problem to re- join the EU and his/her argument is solely based on Independent Scotland. Bear in mind the UK is part of the EU and many people want out for reason of control! So my question - Why oh why would Scotland want to leave the UK only to join the EU and be partly controlled by Brussels?? Not very independent is it?? " Scotland will continue within the eu. Obviously it is just my opinion but I base it on everything I know and have read and heard over the years of this debate. The idea that we could be out when all it's citizens want in is so unbelievable that....well, I can't believe it. What would the reason be for a veto? Anyway, we are already in the eu and the uk. Only one of those unions works in our favour. Germany is in the eu, no one is gonna tell me Germany isn't an independent nation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find the most amusing part of this thread regarding the EU. A certain person on previous threads (mentioning no names) seems to think that it will be no problem to re- join the EU and his/her argument is solely based on Independent Scotland. Bear in mind the UK is part of the EU and many people want out for reason of control! So my question - Why oh why would Scotland want to leave the UK only to join the EU and be partly controlled by Brussels?? Not very independent is it?? Scotland will continue within the eu. Obviously it is just my opinion but I base it on everything I know and have read and heard over the years of this debate. The idea that we could be out when all it's citizens want in is so unbelievable that....well, I can't believe it. What would the reason be for a veto? Anyway, we are already in the eu and the uk. Only one of those unions works in our favour. Germany is in the eu, no one is gonna tell me Germany isn't an independent nation. " Now you are having a laugh... How's can Scotland be compared to Germany? They were not part of a union that was a member of the EU that left the Union to become an independent country were they? Unless you're trying to compare the reunification of Germany with Scotland leaving the UK which is like comparing chalk and cheese really isn't it? It's certainly not a comparison most people would make. Scotland will have to negotiate its own terms with the EU, that doesn't happen overnight, it usually takes years. Why is Scotland different from other nations hoping to join the EU? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find the most amusing part of this thread regarding the EU. A certain person on previous threads (mentioning no names) seems to think that it will be no problem to re- join the EU and his/her argument is solely based on Independent Scotland. Bear in mind the UK is part of the EU and many people want out for reason of control! So my question - Why oh why would Scotland want to leave the UK only to join the EU and be partly controlled by Brussels?? Not very independent is it?? Scotland will continue within the eu. Obviously it is just my opinion but I base it on everything I know and have read and heard over the years of this debate. The idea that we could be out when all it's citizens want in is so unbelievable that....well, I can't believe it. What would the reason be for a veto? Anyway, we are already in the eu and the uk. Only one of those unions works in our favour. Germany is in the eu, no one is gonna tell me Germany isn't an independent nation. " You have been saying that for months. You have been telling me that I know nothing, that I have no grasp on the political realities, one of your fellow nationalists has even made veiled threats and resorted to using scottish gaelic in an attempt to silence my message. Then you told me that when the Spanish PM said what I had been saying for months, that you won't be allowed to stay in the EU, he was addressing the Catalans and Basques not the Scotts. When I asked: Do you think they will hear the message when Spain vetoes your continued membership of the EU? And forces you to re-apply and go through the full process of EU application you ignore that point. Then when the President of the Commission says your readmission will be difficult if not impossible you dismiss him as just a Portuguese politician. You similarly dismiss everything said by anyone else that does not conform with what you want to hear. At what point are you going to realise that it is you and those who give you your opinion that are wrong? And before you say that I would say that because I am in the 'No' camp, go check all my posts, you will find that I have only once said which way you should vote and that was 'Yes'. Admittedly there was a lot of sarcasm in that post, but I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you and yours are a cancerous growth that the UK needs to cut out for our benefit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Now you are having a laugh... How's can Scotland be compared to Germany? They were not part of a union that was a member of the EU that left the Union to become an independent country were they? Unless you're trying to compare the reunification of Germany with Scotland leaving the UK which is like comparing chalk and cheese really isn't it? It's certainly not a comparison most people would make. Scotland will have to negotiate its own terms with the EU, that doesn't happen overnight, it usually takes years. Why is Scotland different from other nations hoping to join the EU? " Jesus cos we are already in it!! Our citizens are eu citizens. We operate under eu law! We meet the criteria in every way and the only difference is we will be independent and richer! How does that work against us? You say it could take years. I say a year and a half. And I'm not the only one who thinks so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You have been saying that for months. You have been telling me that I know nothing, that I have no grasp on the political realities, one of your fellow nationalists has even made veiled threats and resorted to using scottish gaelic in an attempt to silence my message. Then you told me that when the Spanish PM said what I had been saying for months, that you won't be allowed to stay in the EU, he was addressing the Catalans and Basques not the Scotts. When I asked: Do you think they will hear the message when Spain vetoes your continued membership of the EU? And forces you to re-apply and go through the full process of EU application you ignore that point. Then when the President of the Commission says your readmission will be difficult if not impossible you dismiss him as just a Portuguese politician. You similarly dismiss everything said by anyone else that does not conform with what you want to hear. At what point are you going to realise that it is you and those who give you your opinion that are wrong? And before you say that I would say that because I am in the 'No' camp, go check all my posts, you will find that I have only once said which way you should vote and that was 'Yes'. Admittedly there was a lot of sarcasm in that post, but I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you and yours are a cancerous growth that the UK needs to cut out for our benefit. " And I stand by that. Both the Spanish and Portuguese politicans carry as much weight on the subject as Scottish and English ones. They are politicans and what they say and why should be scrutinised. You seem to blindly beleive them. You have previously referred to us on the yes side as bigots. Now we are cancerous. I have my own opinions of you and I won't tarnish this debate by voicing them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Now you are having a laugh... How's can Scotland be compared to Germany? They were not part of a union that was a member of the EU that left the Union to become an independent country were they? Unless you're trying to compare the reunification of Germany with Scotland leaving the UK which is like comparing chalk and cheese really isn't it? It's certainly not a comparison most people would make. Scotland will have to negotiate its own terms with the EU, that doesn't happen overnight, it usually takes years. Why is Scotland different from other nations hoping to join the EU? Jesus cos we are already in it!! Our citizens are eu citizens. We operate under eu law! We meet the criteria in every way and the only difference is we will be independent and richer! How does that work against us? You say it could take years. I say a year and a half. And I'm not the only one who thinks so. " You only have to look down the list of EU member states to spot that Scotland isn't on it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Now you are having a laugh... How's can Scotland be compared to Germany? They were not part of a union that was a member of the EU that left the Union to become an independent country were they? Unless you're trying to compare the reunification of Germany with Scotland leaving the UK which is like comparing chalk and cheese really isn't it? It's certainly not a comparison most people would make. Scotland will have to negotiate its own terms with the EU, that doesn't happen overnight, it usually takes years. Why is Scotland different from other nations hoping to join the EU? Jesus cos we are already in it!! Our citizens are eu citizens. We operate under eu law! We meet the criteria in every way and the only difference is we will be independent and richer! How does that work against us? You say it could take years. I say a year and a half. And I'm not the only one who thinks so. " The United Kingdom is in the EU Scotland isn't as a named member state. Scotland leaves United Kingdom. What comes next... Has Scotland negotiated its terms with the EU? I soppose you just want to pay 9% of what the UK pays to become an independent member state. Doesn't it work by member states voting on new entrants? Hasn't it just taken those small countries years to join? You are EU citizens by way of the UK membership, same as the rest of us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... Ask yourself why the European Union would allow Croatia, Romania and Bulgaria to join but would actively refuse to allow Scotland in for the reason that we democratically chose to leave a nation that we are bigger and richer than and who is about to hold an in/out referendum on membership themselves. ...." Ok, a theory, and just a theory mind, is that they are trying to prevent a breakup of the UK by casting doubt on readmission, because unlike other far poorer countries who have joined and want to join, scotland would be setting the dangerous precedent of being the first to actually and sucessfully secede from the EU. I have no evidence for this, but to my mind, at least it's plausible. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". The United Kingdom is in the EU Scotland isn't as a named member state. Scotland leaves United Kingdom. What comes next... Has Scotland negotiated its terms with the EU? I soppose you just want to pay 9% of what the UK pays to become an independent member state. Doesn't it work by member states voting on new entrants? Hasn't it just taken those small countries years to join? You are EU citizens by way of the UK membership, same as the rest of us. " What would the reason be for almost allowing us in within the 1.5 year timeframe. Give me some reasons that someone might veto. Bear in mind that a nation won't veto lightly, they know the implications this could have on continuing relations. So we are in now but by leaving the uk we are out on our arse because of some nation vetoing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". The United Kingdom is in the EU Scotland isn't as a named member state. Scotland leaves United Kingdom. What comes next... Has Scotland negotiated its terms with the EU? I soppose you just want to pay 9% of what the UK pays to become an independent member state. Doesn't it work by member states voting on new entrants? Hasn't it just taken those small countries years to join? You are EU citizens by way of the UK membership, same as the rest of us. What would the reason be for almost allowing us in within the 1.5 year timeframe. Give me some reasons that someone might veto. Bear in mind that a nation won't veto lightly, they know the implications this could have on continuing relations. So we are in now but by leaving the uk we are out on our arse because of some nation vetoing?" Spain seems up for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Spain seems up for it." Based on what? Rahoy? That's like basing your vote on Cameron or Salmond alone! So all the spainish fisherman in the North Sea have to go home and the Spanish economy takes the hit. International relations take a serious hit. And all for what? Why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think Spain may well force Scotland along a very long route to join the EU. This would be to show the Catalans etc. that Independence from the original country comes at a huge financial cost and leaves you vulnerable for many years. While applying for EU membership is perfectly acceptable,a fast track into it is not. " So what happens in the interim? In practical terms what happens in Scotland for that duration that we are non eu citizens in a non eu country. Think about it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think Spain may well force Scotland along a very long route to join the EU. This would be to show the Catalans etc. that Independence from the original country comes at a huge financial cost and leaves you vulnerable for many years. While applying for EU membership is perfectly acceptable,a fast track into it is not. So what happens in the interim? In practical terms what happens in Scotland for that duration that we are non eu citizens in a non eu country. Think about it. " Parritch and auld clathes? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Now you are having a laugh... How's can Scotland be compared to Germany? They were not part of a union that was a member of the EU that left the Union to become an independent country were they? Unless you're trying to compare the reunification of Germany with Scotland leaving the UK which is like comparing chalk and cheese really isn't it? It's certainly not a comparison most people would make. Scotland will have to negotiate its own terms with the EU, that doesn't happen overnight, it usually takes years. Why is Scotland different from other nations hoping to join the EU? Jesus cos we are already in it!! Our citizens are eu citizens. We operate under eu law! We meet the criteria in every way and the only difference is we will be independent and richer! How does that work against us? You say it could take years. I say a year and a half. And I'm not the only one who thinks so. " I think you are a broken record! The United Kindom is part of the EU. At present Scotland is part of the United Kingdom. Google eu member stated and you will see United Kingdom. No where will you see Scotland. Once you leave the United Kingdom you will no longer part of the United Kingdom. Therefore no longer part of EU. How difficult is this to understand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The possibility that everyone and his fishing boat will be taking your fish and your farming subsidy no longer exists. These are just a few of the problems you could have if you vote YES. They may not happen at all,but what IF must surely be considered and not just ignored with a "Why would they" response." So these are the problems if we vote yes is it? So what if we vote no. What about the possilbities of being taken out of the eu by voters in England in the other referendum? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". I think you are a broken record! The United Kindom is part of the EU. At present Scotland is part of the United Kingdom. Google eu member stated and you will see United Kingdom. No where will you see Scotland. Once you leave the United Kingdom you will no longer part of the United Kingdom. Therefore no longer part of EU. How difficult is this to understand. " I couldn't give a damn if I sound like a broken record. What you are struggling with is the possibility that those in the eu will see the logic in allowing us to continue as eu citizen for the following reasons; We are already in it. We don't want to leave it We are richer than the uk We are bigger than the UK (not that size matters but I mean, you put everything on your cv, right?) To remove us, even for a few months or years creates a mess that no one needs and that will cost many nations money. They aren't just gonna veto cos that's what it says in the book! There are negotiations and a year and a half timeframe. I might be a broken record but at least I'm in tune. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The possibility that everyone and his fishing boat will be taking your fish and your farming subsidy no longer exists. These are just a few of the problems you could have if you vote YES. They may not happen at all,but what IF must surely be considered and not just ignored with a "Why would they" response. So these are the problems if we vote yes is it? So what if we vote no. What about the possilbities of being taken out of the eu by voters in England in the other referendum?" I appreciate you find the question difficult but if the UK votes to leave the EU (I doubt there'll ever be a vote, far less a vote to leave) that'll be the democratic decision of the people - just like the Separandum. You can't object to that, can you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". I think you are a broken record! The United Kindom is part of the EU. At present Scotland is part of the United Kingdom. Google eu member stated and you will see United Kingdom. No where will you see Scotland. Once you leave the United Kingdom you will no longer part of the United Kingdom. Therefore no longer part of EU. How difficult is this to understand. I couldn't give a damn if I sound like a broken record. What you are struggling with is the possibility that those in the eu will see the logic in allowing us to continue as eu citizen for the following reasons; We are already in it. We don't want to leave it We are richer than the uk We are bigger than the UK (not that size matters but I mean, you put everything on your cv, right?) To remove us, even for a few months or years creates a mess that no one needs and that will cost many nations money. They aren't just gonna veto cos that's what it says in the book! There are negotiations and a year and a half timeframe. I might be a broken record but at least I'm in tune. " There we have it. It's in the Shite paper so it MUST be true. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". I think you are a broken record! The United Kindom is part of the EU. At present Scotland is part of the United Kingdom. Google eu member stated and you will see United Kingdom. No where will you see Scotland. Once you leave the United Kingdom you will no longer part of the United Kingdom. Therefore no longer part of EU. How difficult is this to understand. I couldn't give a damn if I sound like a broken record. What you are struggling with is the possibility that those in the eu will see the logic in allowing us to continue as eu citizen for the following reasons; We are already in it. We don't want to leave it We are richer than the uk We are bigger than the UK (not that size matters but I mean, you put everything on your cv, right?) To remove us, even for a few months or years creates a mess that no one needs and that will cost many nations money. They aren't just gonna veto cos that's what it says in the book! There are negotiations and a year and a half timeframe. I might be a broken record but at least I'm in tune. " Everyone vote YES and follow this man. Can't wait to see what is going to happen with reasoning like this. I saw an earlier post of yours stating 1 in 4 of English people are in poverty. Another 1 in 4 applies - 1 in 4 of Scots have mental health issues (That is a true fact by the way!). The other 3 must not be in the forum at the moment!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". So all the spainish fisherman in the North Sea have to go home and the Spanish economy takes the hit. International relations take a serious hit. And all for what? Why?" Just a quick question or... Why would the Spanish or any other fishermen for that leave Scottish waters? You need a navy to enforce territorial waters. And what international relations will be damaged? Seems to me that all those little men who can't gain power in legitimate political ways so ferment xenophobia in minorities with chips on their shoulders be they in Spain, France, Germany, Belgum or the Netherland and call it nationalism will have the rug pulled out from under them and will all be secretly happy to watch the Scottish economy fall apart. But hey what would I know about things like this... But getting back to the first part you will have something like 3/4 to 4/5 of the pre breakup territorial waters to police... Where are you going to get the navy and air force to police that? And how are you going to finance and man them? Seems you may be needing those defense forces after all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Being alone and having a very tiny armed forces means you will be unable to protect your fish stocks. £3 billion will not be enough to protect all of your fishing grounds,and who is going to stop Spanish and other nations trawlers from plundering every last fish. "HEY PACK IT IN YOU NAUGHTY LOT" "THOSE ARE OUR FISH" After all they will not be being caught in EU controlled waters, so quotas mean nothing,when its every man for himself. " In the increasingly unlikely event of Separation, Scotland won't have enough of a navy to protect the Govan Ferry or throw an exclusion zone around the Bass Rock. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Scotland will be an EU member state, i don't think that is in doubt. However, it certainly won't be automatic & it may not be quick. What Scots have to consider is what terms will the EU offer/demand for entry to the club? The entry requirements for new applicants are very different to those that the UK had to adhere to. Take up of the Euro, entry into the Shengen agreement for example, plus you almost certainly won't get the rebate the UK currently enjoys. You may well find that Scottish membership of the EU costs you more than at present. These points need examination, not airily dismissed by Salmond by saying it will be all right." Yeah you are right. No one has been examining this at all. It's just Salmond in his castle. Big mad ideas. Do you know this; he actually had the audacity to say the euro was impossible. Impossible says he. Okay I mean he is correct but that doesn't mean he's right! Why we are all blindly following him I'll never know. But hey ho. Let's get pished!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"According to wiki, England is 1.66 times bigger than Scotland. A report i read on the BBC stated that Scotlands economy is 1/10th that of the UK. In fact, Scotland is the 3rd most productive region of the UK. Certainly not bigger, and arguably not the richest region in the UK. " I refer to land and sea territory. And we are richer. I refer to the facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"According to wiki, England is 1.66 times bigger than Scotland. A report i read on the BBC stated that Scotlands economy is 1/10th that of the UK. In fact, Scotland is the 3rd most productive region of the UK. Certainly not bigger, and arguably not the richest region in the UK. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"According to wiki, England is 1.66 times bigger than Scotland. A report i read on the BBC stated that Scotlands economy is 1/10th that of the UK. In fact, Scotland is the 3rd most productive region of the UK. Certainly not bigger, and arguably not the richest region in the UK. " 1.66? Land mass? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". So all the spainish fisherman in the North Sea have to go home and the Spanish economy takes the hit. International relations take a serious hit. And all for what? Why? Just a quick question or... Why would the Spanish or any other fishermen for that leave Scottish waters? You need a navy to enforce territorial waters. And what international relations will be damaged? Seems to me that all those little men who can't gain power in legitimate political ways so ferment xenophobia in minorities with chips on their shoulders be they in Spain, France, Germany, Belgum or the Netherland and call it nationalism will have the rug pulled out from under them and will all be secretly happy to watch the Scottish economy fall apart. But hey what would I know about things like this... But getting back to the first part you will have something like 3/4 to 4/5 of the pre breakup territorial waters to police... Where are you going to get the navy and air force to police that? And how are you going to finance and man them? Seems you may be needing those defense forces after all " You a military man by any chance. You seem to have a thing about it. We'll spend our money on other things thanks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"According to wiki, England is 1.66 times bigger than Scotland. A report i read on the BBC stated that Scotlands economy is 1/10th that of the UK. In fact, Scotland is the 3rd most productive region of the UK. Certainly not bigger, and arguably not the richest region in the UK. I refer to land and sea territory. And we are richer. I refer to the facts. " Making stuff up and calling it facts doesn't make it so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". So all the spainish fisherman in the North Sea have to go home and the Spanish economy takes the hit. International relations take a serious hit. And all for what? Why? Just a quick question or... Why would the Spanish or any other fishermen for that leave Scottish waters? You need a navy to enforce territorial waters. And what international relations will be damaged? Seems to me that all those little men who can't gain power in legitimate political ways so ferment xenophobia in minorities with chips on their shoulders be they in Spain, France, Germany, Belgum or the Netherland and call it nationalism will have the rug pulled out from under them and will all be secretly happy to watch the Scottish economy fall apart. But hey what would I know about things like this... But getting back to the first part you will have something like 3/4 to 4/5 of the pre breakup territorial waters to police... Where are you going to get the navy and air force to police that? And how are you going to finance and man them? Seems you may be needing those defense forces after all You a military man by any chance. You seem to have a thing about it. We'll spend our money on other things thanks. " Yes I am a military man. And just for the record there's a name for countries that decide they dont need military men... Either colonies and territories of countries that do! Or ex countries! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Yes I am a military man. And just for the record there's a name for countries that decide they dont need military men... Either colonies and territories of countries that do! Or ex countries!" Thought so. You'll know this then - When was the last time either of the following countries was subject to unprovoked attack, an act of war, if you will; Ireland Sweden Norway Denmark Iceland Netherlands I pick those because of location and size of population. Thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Yes I am a military man. And just for the record there's a name for countries that decide they dont need military men... Either colonies and territories of countries that do! Or ex countries! Thought so. You'll know this then - When was the last time either of the following countries was subject to unprovoked attack, an act of war, if you will; Ireland Sweden Norway Denmark Iceland Netherlands I pick those because of location and size of population. Thanks" Some of those countries didn't fare too well during WWII. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wonder how long the "GOOD OLD USA" is going to allow an oil rich country with no armed forces to stay independent. Maybe we should ask one of the oil rich gulf states ????" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"According to wiki, England is 1.66 times bigger than Scotland. A report i read on the BBC stated that Scotlands economy is 1/10th that of the UK. In fact, Scotland is the 3rd most productive region of the UK. Certainly not bigger, and arguably not the richest region in the UK. " Couple that with the huge numbers of civil servants employed in UK departments, which will have to relocate, and you have quite a sizeable problem to solve. I have not heard any concrete answers to ANY problem yet, just rhetoric and dogma, I hope the yes campaign put some flesh on the bones soon as there seems to be little or no detail so far. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Yes I am a military man. And just for the record there's a name for countries that decide they dont need military men... Either colonies and territories of countries that do! Or ex countries! Thought so. You'll know this then - When was the last time either of the following countries was subject to unprovoked attack, an act of war, if you will; Ireland Sweden Norway Denmark Iceland Netherlands I pick those because of location and size of population. Thanks" OK Ill go through them in order... Ireland: Because of the position of Ireland we (the UK) kept the 6 counties so we would have a permanent military presence in Ireland that could move south of the border to counter any invasion. We also kept overall responsibility for the security of Irish territorial waters and 3 deep water port and the right to recruit troops in the south when we signed the Anglo Irish Treaty in 1921. Sweden: That would be the peace loving country that developed the first stealth warships and have sunk a number of USSR submarines that entered their territorial waters. Norway: One of the original members of NATO with the second best artic army in the world. Denmark: That would be the country that kicked the crap out of the USSR in The winter War so much that the russians sued for peace and after the end of WW2 guaranteed to respect Finish borders on condition that they did not join NATO. And in my opinion has the best artic army in the world. Iceland: The country that kicked our butts in the cod wars. Netherlands: Again one of the original members of NATO and thus protected. Want to try again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Now you are having a laugh... How's can Scotland be compared to Germany? They were not part of a union that was a member of the EU that left the Union to become an independent country were they? Unless you're trying to compare the reunification of Germany with Scotland leaving the UK which is like comparing chalk and cheese really isn't it? It's certainly not a comparison most people would make. Scotland will have to negotiate its own terms with the EU, that doesn't happen overnight, it usually takes years. Why is Scotland different from other nations hoping to join the EU? Jesus cos we are already in it!! Our citizens are eu citizens. We operate under eu law! We meet the criteria in every way and the only difference is we will be independent and richer! How does that work against us? You say it could take years. I say a year and a half. And I'm not the only one who thinks so. " We are EU citizens because we are part of the UNITED KINGDOM who is a member. If we choose to leave the UK and go independent then we are no longer EU citizens. That's like saying because we are British citizens now we will still be if we go independent!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Yes I am a military man. And just for the record there's a name for countries that decide they dont need military men... Either colonies and territories of countries that do! Or ex countries! Thought so. You'll know this then - When was the last time either of the following countries was subject to unprovoked attack, an act of war, if you will; Ireland Sweden Norway Denmark Iceland Netherlands I pick those because of location and size of population. Thanks OK Ill go through them in order... Ireland: Because of the position of Ireland we (the UK) kept the 6 counties so we would have a permanent military presence in Ireland that could move south of the border to counter any invasion. We also kept overall responsibility for the security of Irish territorial waters and 3 deep water port and the right to recruit troops in the south when we signed the Anglo Irish Treaty in 1921. Sweden: That would be the peace loving country that developed the first stealth warships and have sunk a number of USSR submarines that entered their territorial waters. Norway: One of the original members of NATO with the second best artic army in the world. Denmark: That would be the country that kicked the crap out of the USSR in The winter War so much that the russians sued for peace and after the end of WW2 guaranteed to respect Finish borders on condition that they did not join NATO. And in my opinion has the best artic army in the world. Iceland: The country that kicked our butts in the cod wars. Netherlands: Again one of the original members of NATO and thus protected. Want to try again? " Try again? Repeat the question or just re-word it. I'll just repeat it. When was the last time any of those countries was the victim of an unprovoked attack/act of war? If the answer is "during the war" then say so. Also, it's great that you start that by essentially saying "when we were the agressor..." Did I say you were stuck in the past before? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The point he was making, that seems to have completely missed you, was very simple. They all have very good armed forces to protect themselves. Your notion that you need bugger all means your open to having all your assets "BORROWED" How does your peace loving,non military country propose to defend your fishing waters ??? How do you propose to protect your VITAL oil installations ?? " And the point which has passed you by too is that our planned defence budget is ample to have a Scottish defence force and defend what we need to defend. Once again your assumption seems to be that if it's not from the UK, then it simply cannot be. All or nothing. You have to get your head aroun the fact that small independent countries can have small defence forces and manage just fine. Our military friend is simply caught in the old fashioned British power and clout and strength etc. days gone by. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One Type 45 destroyer £1 billion Sterling. That does not include any running cost or training of men to operate it. Your £3 billion budget would have a Navy using what kind of vessels to patrol an area bigger than Scotlands land mass. "think we going to need a bigger boat"" Okay. Think this way. It's hardly a vote loser. The 3bn budget is widely accepted as being more than enough. You are coming from the point of view of Britain. Bigger = more powerful and more clout and blah blah blah. Personally, and in the opinion of many people here, we don't need any more than that. The trick is not galavanting around the world attacking and provoking innocent people. This menatality is just another reason we not "better together". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its a decision for the Scots, I will be gutted if Scotland leaves the Union, to join another (E)Union and lose more power. I consider myself British and proud" I respect your option but nationalism shouldn't feature in the decision. Pride, flags etc is all very well and good but this is serious and the union simply doesn't work for us any longer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The EU we are already a member. Why should it be taken away . Nobody said anything when East Germany came into the EU. When the Berlin Wall came down. " its not the same as an 'independent' Scotland though, East and West Germany were still one country under different governance.. at present Scotland is part of the UK.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Duncan, in the previous thread i asked why an independent country would allow another country to set its interest rates by virtue of having the same currency..? " And? Did I not answer it? It's our currency too you know. Bank of England is ours too. You know that Bank of England is independent of government right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The EU we are already a member. Why should it be taken away . Nobody said anything when East Germany came into the EU. When the Berlin Wall came down. This like an argument About toys if you vote yes we will take them away. Vote no and you can keep them. Well the child has grown up. And wants it's own freedom and independence. We are a strong proud country. Maybe it's time to stand up and be counted. " And if you chose to go, good luck and I'm sure the rest of the UK would wish you well. What people are curious about is the detail if the yes bots wins. All I have heard is rhetoric and dogma, no meat on the bones and an insistence that whenever anyone says something that doesn't fit well with the rhetoric it is no more than bullying. I have visions of the aftermath of the Independence Party. People staggering round, still hungover, shrugging their shoulders and saying, " now what?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK Ill go through them again putting in dates and spelling out the realities for the obtuse, thats you Duncan Ireland: Because of the position of Ireland we (the UK) kept the 6 counties so we would have a permanent military presence in Ireland that could move south of the border to counter any invasion. We also kept overall responsibility for the security of Irish territorial waters and 3 deep water port and the right to recruit troops in the south when we signed the Anglo Irish Treaty in 1921. Therefore Ireland is an exception because its security is guaranteed by the UK because it is in our national interest to do so. Sweden: That would be the peace loving country that developed the first stealth warships and have sunk a number of USSR submarines that entered their territorial waters. The Swedes have never admitted to sinking foreign submarines but do acknowledge many incidents where they have dropped depth charges from ships and helicopters. Look up the incident in first 2 weeks of October 1982. Or even better try looking up the 'Soviet submarine S-363' incident. Norway: One of the original members of NATO with the second best artic army in the world. Norway is part of NATO and an attack on any member state is an attack on all. Denmark: That would be the country that kicked the crap out of the USSR in The winter War so much that the russians sued for peace and after the end of WW2 guaranteed to respect Finish borders on condition that they did not join NATO. And in my opinion has the best artic army in the world. It is quite a well known open secret in the military world that even now single Danes have a habit of going out into the wilderness with one of their fighting knives and gutting russian border guards they find on their own. The Danes are not fluffy bunnies and would make the meanest Glaswegian, hilander, para or commando look like kindergarten cubs! Iceland: The country that kicked our butts in the cod wars. 1976 Netherlands: Again one of the original members of NATO and thus protected. As I have stated above attacking any NATO country is an attack on all NATO countries. Just to be clear you will also leave NATO when you Leave the UK. Want to try again? " Ok you think we are leaving NATO too? This forum is like going back in time a year for those of us in Scotland. So tiring. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I have visions of the aftermath of the Independence Party. People staggering round, still hungover, shrugging their shoulders and saying, " now what?" " We are getting to the silly and frankly insultin stage I see. Because you are woefully uninformed, you think we are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Duncan, in the previous thread i asked why an independent country would allow another country to set its interest rates by virtue of having the same currency..? And? Did I not answer it? It's our currency too you know. Bank of England is ours too. You know that Bank of England is independent of government right?" so an 'independent' Scotland has its interest rates set by the Bank of England, If and its a big If the status quo remains.. an institution which is still under the control of whichever resident of number 11 despite the pretence.. when push comes to shove they will look after the majority.. look at Carney's statement about 7% unemployment and a rise in the BofE base rate last summer and the recent u turn when the tories clocked on that interest rises this far before the 2015 election will be disastrous for them.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Ok you think we are leaving NATO too? This forum is like going back in time a year for those of us in Scotland. So tiring. " No, I dont think, I know. I keep telling you the people who count, that is the people who run the UK, the EU, the multinational (US) businesses who have based their UK operations in Scotland are all telling you that if you divorce the UK you divorce them too. Like it or not those powerful people also control NATO so it does not take a genius to work out that you will be out of NATO too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I have visions of the aftermath of the Independence Party. People staggering round, still hungover, shrugging their shoulders and saying, " now what?" We are getting to the silly and frankly insultin stage I see. Because you are woefully uninformed, you think we are. " What was insulting about that? Are you being serious? You felt insulted? Really? Anyway, instead of deflecting and since you seem to know so much about it, could you please educate us woefully uninformed idiots? I use the word idiot as that is what some scots were calling the English on another thread, the same thread where you insulted me directly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Duncan, in the previous thread i asked why an independent country would allow another country to set its interest rates by virtue of having the same currency..? And? Did I not answer it? It's our currency too you know. Bank of England is ours too. You know that Bank of England is independent of government right?" Leave the union you lose the umbrella of the Bank of England you WILL NOT Be members of the UK Central bank ! WHY would you want to be anyway Scotland is far richer than the UK , remember ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK Ill go through them again putting in dates and spelling out the realities for the obtuse, thats you Duncan Ireland: Because of the position of Ireland we (the UK) kept the 6 counties so we would have a permanent military presence in Ireland that could move south of the border to counter any invasion. We also kept overall responsibility for the security of Irish territorial waters and 3 deep water port and the right to recruit troops in the south when we signed the Anglo Irish Treaty in 1921. Therefore Ireland is an exception because its security is guaranteed by the UK because it is in our national interest to do so. Sweden: That would be the peace loving country that developed the first stealth warships and have sunk a number of USSR submarines that entered their territorial waters. The Swedes have never admitted to sinking foreign submarines but do acknowledge many incidents where they have dropped depth charges from ships and helicopters. Look up the incident in first 2 weeks of October 1982. Or even better try looking up the 'Soviet submarine S-363' incident. Norway: One of the original members of NATO with the second best artic army in the world. Norway is part of NATO and an attack on any member state is an attack on all. Denmark: That would be the country that kicked the crap out of the USSR in The winter War so much that the russians sued for peace and after the end of WW2 guaranteed to respect Finish borders on condition that they did not join NATO. And in my opinion has the best artic army in the world. It is quite a well known open secret in the military world that even now single Danes have a habit of going out into the wilderness with one of their fighting knives and gutting russian border guards they find on their own. The Danes are not fluffy bunnies and would make the meanest Glaswegian, hilander, para or commando look like kindergarten cubs! Iceland: The country that kicked our butts in the cod wars. 1976 Netherlands: Again one of the original members of NATO and thus protected. As I have stated above attacking any NATO country is an attack on all NATO countries. Just to be clear you will also leave NATO when you Leave the UK. Want to try again? Ok you think we are leaving NATO too? This forum is like going back in time a year for those of us in Scotland. So tiring. " I think everyone is tired of hearing the same rubbish. Numerous people have given valid opinion about where Scotland will stand and if it is not to your taste you reply with random answers completely deflecting the question at hand. The reality is that no one knows exactly what will happen including you. You do not have all of the answers. You are following what closed minded people have said to you. Saying and doing are two different things and we will see exactly what will happen come September and following. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does all seem a bit idealistic; all the sugar and none of the shit. I'm a bit worried about the rammifications on the UK when Scotland do leave as we will never be able to give our banking industry the firm hand it needs with the partial loss of income from oil revenue." I read recently that the tax revenue from the oil makes up 1.5% of the total UK tax revenue, so it will be noticed but its not a deal breaker. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Duncan, in the previous thread i asked why an independent country would allow another country to set its interest rates by virtue of having the same currency..? And? Did I not answer it? It's our currency too you know. Bank of England is ours too. You know that Bank of England is independent of government right?" Put it like this, where is the oil? And it belongs to whom? Hold that thought. Now, where is the Bank of England? And it belongs to whom? Have you seen groundhog day? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What was insulting about that? Are you being serious? You felt insulted? Really? Anyway, instead of deflecting and since you seem to know so much about it, could you please educate us woefully uninformed idiots? I use the word idiot as that is what some scots were calling the English on another thread, the same thread where you insulted me directly." You implication that we are all the gonna get pished and the realise what a mistake we have made is ludicrous. We have been preparing for this for years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, I dont think, I know. I keep telling you the people who count, that is the people who run the UK, the EU, the multinational (US) businesses who have based their UK operations in Scotland are all telling you that if you divorce the UK you divorce them too. Like it or not those powerful people also control NATO so it does not take a genius to work out that you will be out of NATO too." The people who count are the uk are they? Your mentality is one of the any reasons I can't wait to live in an independent Scotland. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would anyone sign up for a mortgage or other large financial risk based on the current lack of definates / this is the rate and for how long etc actually in writing with your house on the line..? not just the guy organising the dealsaying 'it will be ok..'" There are as many definites in the union as there are in independence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Put it like this, where is the oil? And it belongs to whom? Hold that thought. Now, where is the Bank of England? And it belongs to whom? Have you seen groundhog day? " I'm not sure what wake I can do to make you see that the Bank of England is a partly owned Scottish asset. Oil not yet taken out of the ground in Scottish waters, is Scotland's post independence. These are just facts. I'm sorry if it doesn't suit your way of thinking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" There are as many definites in the union as there are in independence. " So your currency is going to definitely be ???? Your Eu membership is definitely going to be approved on what date ???? Your most important definates are not even on the "TO DO" list never mind definate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" What was insulting about that? Are you being serious? You felt insulted? Really? Anyway, instead of deflecting and since you seem to know so much about it, could you please educate us woefully uninformed idiots? I use the word idiot as that is what some scots were calling the English on another thread, the same thread where you insulted me directly. You implication that we are all the gonna get pished and the realise what a mistake we have made is ludicrous. We have been preparing for this for years. " I made no such suggestion and that really is a very poor attempt to deflect again. Very poor. Anyway, I await with interest your attempt to put some flesh on the bones rather than just more tub thumping. You said we are woefully uninformed, please, inform us of the detail. What is it that you KNOW you are voting for? Please do not think this is an English person not wanting you to separate, I need to know detail before I know if It is good or not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Put it like this, where is the oil? And it belongs to whom? Hold that thought. Now, where is the Bank of England? And it belongs to whom? Have you seen groundhog day? I'm not sure what wake I can do to make you see that the Bank of England is a partly owned Scottish asset. Oil not yet taken out of the ground in Scottish waters, is Scotland's post independence. These are just facts. I'm sorry if it doesn't suit your way of thinking. " Any oil in the ground is not Scotlands,only the potential revenue once brought ashore will be. Now if some small minded chancellor was to give huge tax breaks to move the pipe line around hundred miles south That would mean what exactly ???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Put it like this, where is the oil? And it belongs to whom? Hold that thought. Now, where is the Bank of England? And it belongs to whom? Have you seen groundhog day? I'm not sure what wake I can do to make you see that the Bank of England is a partly owned Scottish asset. Oil not yet taken out of the ground in Scottish waters, is Scotland's post independence. These are just facts. I'm sorry if it doesn't suit your way of thinking. " No, assets owned by the BoE are partly Scotland's, approx 9% of the £3Bn balance of assets & liabilities. The BoE belongs to the UK and will remain so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Put it like this, where is the oil? And it belongs to whom? Hold that thought. Now, where is the Bank of England? And it belongs to whom? Have you seen groundhog day? I'm not sure what wake I can do to make you see that the Bank of England is a partly owned Scottish asset. Oil not yet taken out of the ground in Scottish waters, is Scotland's post independence. These are just facts. I'm sorry if it doesn't suit your way of thinking. Any oil in the ground is not Scotlands,only the potential revenue once brought ashore will be. Now if some small minded chancellor was to give huge tax breaks to move the pipe line around hundred miles south That would mean what exactly ????" . .WAR ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Ok you think we are leaving NATO too? This forum is like going back in time a year for those of us in Scotland. So tiring. No, I dont think, I know. I keep telling you the people who count, that is the people who run the UK, the EU, the multinational (US) businesses who have based their UK operations in Scotland are all telling you that if you divorce the UK you divorce them too. Like it or not those powerful people also control NATO so it does not take a genius to work out that you will be out of NATO too." Only a few weeks ago not being part of NATO was official SNP policy and had been for years. The change cost them members and two MSPs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The leader of the Scottish Conservatives today said he thought Scotland retaining the pound was a sensible idea. However he also pointed out that, in the event of a yes vote the momentum swings towards the UK. His point being that whilst the UK has no voice in the referendum, an iScotland will have no voice in the UK general election - and that is where a Currency Union will be debated. Given that no main party leader is in favour, business leaders are against it, HM Treasury warns against it, the BoE says it won't work without full political union & the electorate appear to be against it, how will iScotland manage to convince an increasingly sceptical UK to sign up to a deal that puts her at such a disadvantage? The answer is you won't. You will have no influence on the decision that will majorly affect your economy & future direction." She. I know she has short hair and comfortable shoes but the leader of the Scottish conservatives is a she. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The people who count are the uk are they? Your mentality is one of the any reasons I can't wait to live in an independent Scotland. " My mentality! You are a total idiot! The simple fact is I profoundly disagree with your position. Not because there is something in it for me, the simple fact is there isn't, in fact if I were to play the bugger you jack I'm OK game I would be saying and doing everything in my power to get Scotland to vote 'Yes'. However I am sure you are making a terrible mistake and am trying desperately to point out the inconsistencies of your position. And just to make things very clear to you I would willing die to protect your freedom to make that mistake. But hey I, and no doubt all the other loyal military people like me are a really good reason to want an independent Scotland without my type. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With a £3 billion budget for all military expenses ???? Be a bit one sided dont you think ????" hand to hand combat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"did you see what we did lo wembly ha. x X X" I saw what Rangers fans did to Manchester! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I made no such suggestion and that really is a very poor attempt to deflect again. Very poor. Anyway, I await with interest your attempt to put some flesh on the bones rather than just more tub thumping. You said we are woefully uninformed, please, inform us of the detail. What is it that you KNOW you are voting for? Please do not think this is an English person not wanting you to separate, I need to know detail before I know if It is good or not." Yes you did. And I have been heavily involved in debates on here on the issues and can hardly be accused of avoiding the issues! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The leader of the Scottish Conservatives today said he thought Scotland retaining the pound was a sensible idea. However he also pointed out that, in the event of a yes vote the momentum swings towards the UK. His point being that whilst the UK has no voice in the referendum, an iScotland will have no voice in the UK general election - and that is where a Currency Union will be debated. Given that no main party leader is in favour, business leaders are against it, HM Treasury warns against it, the BoE says it won't work without full political union & the electorate appear to be against it, how will iScotland manage to convince an increasingly sceptical UK to sign up to a deal that puts her at such a disadvantage? The answer is you won't. You will have no influence on the decision that will majorly affect your economy & future direction. She. I know she has short hair and comfortable shoes but the leader of the Scottish conservatives is a she. " Is this the kind of homophobic comment which will be encouraged in any Separate Scotland? Quite disgraceful. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry, my mistake, the Deputy Leader of Scots Conservatives Mr Jackson Carlaw. " He's a failed second hand car salesman. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I made no such suggestion and that really is a very poor attempt to deflect again. Very poor. Anyway, I await with interest your attempt to put some flesh on the bones rather than just more tub thumping. You said we are woefully uninformed, please, inform us of the detail. What is it that you KNOW you are voting for? Please do not think this is an English person not wanting you to separate, I need to know detail before I know if It is good or not. Yes you did. And I have been heavily involved in debates on here on the issues and can hardly be accused of avoiding the issues!" Avoiding the awkward questions though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The leader of the Scottish Conservatives today said he thought Scotland retaining the pound was a sensible idea. However he also pointed out that, in the event of a yes vote the momentum swings towards the UK. His point being that whilst the UK has no voice in the referendum, an iScotland will have no voice in the UK general election - and that is where a Currency Union will be debated. Given that no main party leader is in favour, business leaders are against it, HM Treasury warns against it, the BoE says it won't work without full political union & the electorate appear to be against it, how will iScotland manage to convince an increasingly sceptical UK to sign up to a deal that puts her at such a disadvantage? The answer is you won't. You will have no influence on the decision that will majorly affect your economy & future direction. She. I know she has short hair and comfortable shoes but the leader of the Scottish conservatives is a she. Is this the kind of homophobic comment which will be encouraged in any Separate Scotland? Quite disgraceful." What Onny? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" My mentality! You are a total idiot! The simple fact is I profoundly disagree with your position. Not because there is something in it for me, the simple fact is there isn't, in fact if I were to play the bugger you jack I'm OK game I would be saying and doing everything in my power to get Scotland to vote 'Yes'. However I am sure you are making a terrible mistake and am trying desperately to point out the inconsistencies of your position. And just to make things very clear to you I would willing die to protect your freedom to make that mistake. But hey I, and no doubt all the other loyal military people like me are a really good reason to want an independent Scotland without my type." Yes your mentatlity. You are a dinosaur, living in the past wishing you were still and imperial power. For every scot with an inferiority complex, there is no doubt and English person with a superiority complex. We don't need the Great British empire or you or your weapons of mass destruction to protect us. Thanks for the offer to die for us but no thanks all the same. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The leader of the Scottish Conservatives today said he thought Scotland retaining the pound was a sensible idea. However he also pointed out that, in the event of a yes vote the momentum swings towards the UK. His point being that whilst the UK has no voice in the referendum, an iScotland will have no voice in the UK general election - and that is where a Currency Union will be debated. Given that no main party leader is in favour, business leaders are against it, HM Treasury warns against it, the BoE says it won't work without full political union & the electorate appear to be against it, how will iScotland manage to convince an increasingly sceptical UK to sign up to a deal that puts her at such a disadvantage? The answer is you won't. You will have no influence on the decision that will majorly affect your economy & future direction. She. I know she has short hair and comfortable shoes but the leader of the Scottish conservatives is a she. Is this the kind of homophobic comment which will be encouraged in any Separate Scotland? Quite disgraceful. What Onny? " Ruth is a lesbian . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The leader of the Scottish Conservatives today said he thought Scotland retaining the pound was a sensible idea. However he also pointed out that, in the event of a yes vote the momentum swings towards the UK. His point being that whilst the UK has no voice in the referendum, an iScotland will have no voice in the UK general election - and that is where a Currency Union will be debated. Given that no main party leader is in favour, business leaders are against it, HM Treasury warns against it, the BoE says it won't work without full political union & the electorate appear to be against it, how will iScotland manage to convince an increasingly sceptical UK to sign up to a deal that puts her at such a disadvantage? The answer is you won't. You will have no influence on the decision that will majorly affect your economy & future direction. She. I know she has short hair and comfortable shoes but the leader of the Scottish conservatives is a she. Is this the kind of homophobic comment which will be encouraged in any Separate Scotland? Quite disgraceful. What Onny? Ruth is a lesbian ." So? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The leader of the Scottish Conservatives today said he thought Scotland retaining the pound was a sensible idea. However he also pointed out that, in the event of a yes vote the momentum swings towards the UK. His point being that whilst the UK has no voice in the referendum, an iScotland will have no voice in the UK general election - and that is where a Currency Union will be debated. Given that no main party leader is in favour, business leaders are against it, HM Treasury warns against it, the BoE says it won't work without full political union & the electorate appear to be against it, how will iScotland manage to convince an increasingly sceptical UK to sign up to a deal that puts her at such a disadvantage? The answer is you won't. You will have no influence on the decision that will majorly affect your economy & future direction. She. I know she has short hair and comfortable shoes but the leader of the Scottish conservatives is a she. Is this the kind of homophobic comment which will be encouraged in any Separate Scotland? Quite disgraceful. What Onny? Ruth is a lesbian . So?" Read the whole post. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I made no such suggestion and that really is a very poor attempt to deflect again. Very poor. Anyway, I await with interest your attempt to put some flesh on the bones rather than just more tub thumping. You said we are woefully uninformed, please, inform us of the detail. What is it that you KNOW you are voting for? Please do not think this is an English person not wanting you to separate, I need to know detail before I know if It is good or not. Yes you did. And I have been heavily involved in debates on here on the issues and can hardly be accused of avoiding the issues!" No I didn't and that really is a pathetic thing to say and also totally irrelevant. I am now accusing you of avoiding the detail, I have asked you for detail twice. You have twice made an awful attempt to deflect the question. You gave said that we were woefully informed so I asked you for detail. For the THIRD time, please. Inform ups of the detail. No tub thumping, no deflecting, just detail. Please let me know the things that you KNOW you are voting for.to make it easier for you, start with currency. What is it that WILL happen on that front? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No I didn't and that really is a pathetic thing to say and also totally irrelevant. I am now accusing you of avoiding the detail, I have asked you for detail twice. You have twice made an awful attempt to deflect the question. You gave said that we were woefully informed so I asked you for detail. For the THIRD time, please. Inform ups of the detail. No tub thumping, no deflecting, just detail. Please let me know the things that you KNOW you are voting for.to make it easier for you, start with currency. What is it that WILL happen on that front?" Seriously? What? What question have you asked? What details do you need? Be specific. I'm not running through the whole white paper! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" My mentality! You are a total idiot! The simple fact is I profoundly disagree with your position. Not because there is something in it for me, the simple fact is there isn't, in fact if I were to play the bugger you jack I'm OK game I would be saying and doing everything in my power to get Scotland to vote 'Yes'. However I am sure you are making a terrible mistake and am trying desperately to point out the inconsistencies of your position. And just to make things very clear to you I would willing die to protect your freedom to make that mistake. But hey I, and no doubt all the other loyal military people like me are a really good reason to want an independent Scotland without my type. Yes your mentatlity. You are a dinosaur, living in the past wishing you were still and imperial power. For every scot with an inferiority complex, there is no doubt and English person with a superiority complex. We don't need the Great British empire or you or your weapons of mass destruction to protect us. Thanks for the offer to die for us but no thanks all the same. " Wow you really are a tit. This will definitely be worth the forum ban. I can't believe how stupid you actually are. All you talk about is how oppressed you have been all your life and that you will be so much better off without the English pulling you back. Remember that the UK is made up of more than just us English arse holes. Your kind of hatred for the English is plain for everyone to see. You don't want Independence for the right reasons. You have been brought up on this mistaken belief that anything English is shit and all we do is hold you back. You are so narrow minded it is untrue and your downfall will be this ridiculous ideology that everything will be ok once its just ''US'' . Get a grip man and stop being such an ignorant arse!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No I didn't and that really is a pathetic thing to say and also totally irrelevant. I am now accusing you of avoiding the detail, I have asked you for detail twice. You have twice made an awful attempt to deflect the question. You gave said that we were woefully informed so I asked you for detail. For the THIRD time, please. Inform ups of the detail. No tub thumping, no deflecting, just detail. Please let me know the things that you KNOW you are voting for.to make it easier for you, start with currency. What is it that WILL happen on that front? Seriously? What? What question have you asked? What details do you need? Be specific. I'm not running through the whole white paper!" The question is quite clearly there,I have just checked. I will write it out again for you. Fourth time lucky, here goes!!! Please give me the DETAILS of what you KNOW you are voting for with regard to currency. What detail is set in stone on that issue? Try to remember, definate only, no rhetoric and try really really hard not to deflect or avoid the question this time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No I didn't and that really is a pathetic thing to say and also totally irrelevant. I am now accusing you of avoiding the detail, I have asked you for detail twice. You have twice made an awful attempt to deflect the question. You gave said that we were woefully informed so I asked you for detail. For the THIRD time, please. Inform ups of the detail. No tub thumping, no deflecting, just detail. Please let me know the things that you KNOW you are voting for.to make it easier for you, start with currency. What is it that WILL happen on that front? Seriously? What? What question have you asked? What details do you need? Be specific. I'm not running through the whole white paper! The question is quite clearly there,I have just checked. I will write it out again for you. Fourth time lucky, here goes!!! Please give me the DETAILS of what you KNOW you are voting for with regard to currency. What detail is set in stone on that issue? Try to remember, definate only, no rhetoric and try really really hard not to deflect or avoid the question this time." Your wasting your time. He has no idea nor does his party!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Would anyone sign up for a mortgage or other large financial risk based on the current lack of definates / this is the rate and for how long etc actually in writing with your house on the line..? not just the guy organising the dealsaying 'it will be ok..' There are as many definites in the union as there are in independence. " take it that like myself you would'nt sign such a deal either then.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Onny, i once ran into some supporters of the SnG political party at Bannockburn.I'd never heard of them before. They openly claimed Scotland for the 'ethnically Scottish' and said gays wouldn't be welcome in (their version of) an Independent Scotland. Mind you, these were black shirt wearing clowns who delighted in burning the Union Flag on the hill at midnight." Siol nan Gaidheal make the BNP look like moderates. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes your mentatlity. You are a dinosaur, living in the past wishing you were still and imperial power. For every scot with an inferiority complex, there is no doubt and English person with a superiority complex. We don't need the Great British empire or you or your weapons of mass destruction to protect us. Thanks for the offer to die for us but no thanks all the same. " Thank you for that piece of vitriol, it was most welcome and of course totally wrong, like most of what you say. Just to put the record straight, I am not English, I am British! My mother was born on the Cork Kerry border, my father was born in Dublin and all my family bar my brothers are Irish born and bred. I even went to school in Ireland! I have a family history of fenians dating back hundreds of years, however I was born in England and bar school and work overseas have lived here all my life. I fully understand to a small minded Scott like yourself who can't see past his kilt, sporran and saltaire that everyone south of Hadrian's Wall is a sasanach but some of us are really part of something bigger call the United Kingdom of Great Britain and are British! And believe we are better together as one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Onny, i once ran into some supporters of the SnG political party at Bannockburn.I'd never heard of them before. They openly claimed Scotland for the 'ethnically Scottish' and said gays wouldn't be welcome in (their version of) an Independent Scotland. Mind you, these were black shirt wearing clowns who delighted in burning the Union Flag on the hill at midnight. Siol nan Gaidheal make the BNP look like moderates." They were certainly unpleasant, i was thankful we were all quite heavily armed (medieval kit so swords etc) to be honest. Definitely looking for a fight as they'd come into the 'English' camp and started gobbing off. Most of that camp were Scots BTW. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The question is quite clearly there,I have just checked. I will write it out again for you. Fourth time lucky, here goes!!! Please give me the DETAILS of what you KNOW you are voting for with regard to currency. What detail is set in stone on that issue? Try to remember, definate only, no rhetoric and try really really hard not to deflect or avoid the question this time." Definites on currency? Ok The pound is ours so we will use it either in or out of a currency union. Preferesbly in. We are quite a rich country so financially speaking we will be okay regardless. So hopefully enough people see this to not let uncertainty over policy affect their vote. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The question is quite clearly there,I have just checked. I will write it out again for you. Fourth time lucky, here goes!!! Please give me the DETAILS of what you KNOW you are voting for with regard to currency. What detail is set in stone on that issue? Try to remember, definate only, no rhetoric and try really really hard not to deflect or avoid the question this time. Definites on currency? Ok The pound is ours so we will use it either in or out of a currency union. Preferesbly in. We are quite a rich country so financially speaking we will be okay regardless. So hopefully enough people see this to not let uncertainty over policy affect their vote. " I asked for you to give a definite. As soon as you said "either" you said that you don't know. Is knowing the detail not important to you? If it were me, I would like to know what I'm voting for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Thank you for that piece of vitriol, it was most welcome and of course totally wrong, like most of what you say. Just to put the record straight, I am not English, I am British! My mother was born on the Cork Kerry border, my father was born in Dublin and all my family bar my brothers are Irish born and bred. I even went to school in Ireland! I have a family history of fenians dating back hundreds of years, however I was born in England and bar school and work overseas have lived here all my life. I fully understand to a small minded Scott like yourself who can't see past his kilt, sporran and saltaire that everyone south of Hadrian's Wall is a sasanach but some of us are really part of something bigger call the United Kingdom of Great Britain and are British! And believe we are better together as one. " Your previous insistence on calling yes voters "bigots" and today referring to them as "cancerous" tells me all I need to know about you and your rabid British nationalism. I know you are a minority so won't allow it to sour the debate too much. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I asked for you to give a definite. As soon as you said "either" you said that you don't know. Is knowing the detail not important to you? If it were me, I would like to know what I'm voting for." Are there definites in your politics? Will the uk be in the eu in 5 years? What will the tax rate be in 10 years? Who will be the prime minister? What will the policy be on Syria? Definites would be great but it's unrealistic. We have a plan of what we want. We have rationale for it and expert back up. We have fallback plans too. I say again, we have been preparing for this for years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" The question is quite clearly there,I have just checked. I will write it out again for you. Fourth time lucky, here goes!!! Please give me the DETAILS of what you KNOW you are voting for with regard to currency. What detail is set in stone on that issue? Try to remember, definate only, no rhetoric and try really really hard not to deflect or avoid the question this time. Definites on currency? Ok The pound is ours so we will use it either in or out of a currency union. Preferesbly in. We are quite a rich country so financially speaking we will be okay regardless. So hopefully enough people see this to not let uncertainty over policy affect their vote. I asked for you to give a definite. As soon as you said "either" you said that you don't know. Is knowing the detail not important to you? If it were me, I would like to know what I'm voting for." The Nats aren't voting FOR anything - they're voting AGAINST the UK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I asked for you to give a definite. As soon as you said "either" you said that you don't know. Is knowing the detail not important to you? If it were me, I would like to know what I'm voting for. Are there definites in your politics? Will the uk be in the eu in 5 years? What will the tax rate be in 10 years? Who will be the prime minister? What will the policy be on Syria? Definites would be great but it's unrealistic. We have a plan of what we want. We have rationale for it and expert back up. We have fallback plans too. I say again, we have been preparing for this for years. " think its safe to say that 'we' will still have the pound in 5 years, as to whom the 'we' will be thats another question.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand, if as you state you are a rich Nation why would you not set up a Central Bank & issue your own Scottish pound? Why would you be determined to hang on to a currency you do not control & will have Bank of England all over it? Surely a Bank of Scotland Central Bank & currency would be better than your entire economy hanging on a whim of a foreign Govt?" He (Duncan) actually thinks that Scotland will be able to function without a lender of last resort, or that at least is what he is implying. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand, if as you state you are a rich Nation why would you not set up a Central Bank & issue your own Scottish pound? Why would you be determined to hang on to a currency you do not control & will have Bank of England all over it? Surely a Bank of Scotland Central Bank & currency would be better than your entire economy hanging on a whim of a foreign Govt?" I know you don't understand. We are going round in circles so let's leave it there. Just know that a lot of people in Scotland are going to vote for independence and are quite comfortable with the options open to us. Whatever we choose post independence, it is going to be vastly better than crossing our fingers every four years and hoping another country doesn't vote Tory on our behalf again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I asked for you to give a definite. As soon as you said "either" you said that you don't know. Is knowing the detail not important to you? If it were me, I would like to know what I'm voting for. Are there definites in your politics? Will the uk be in the eu in 5 years? What will the tax rate be in 10 years? Who will be the prime minister? What will the policy be on Syria? Definites would be great but it's unrealistic. We have a plan of what we want. We have rationale for it and expert back up. We have fallback plans too. I say again, we have been preparing for this for years. " Preparing for years yet you can't specify anything that is in place??? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" We have a plan of what we want. We have rationale for it and expert back up. We have fallback plans too. I say again, we have been preparing for this for years. " And the rest of the UK's plan isn't going to match your plan, best get your head around the fact that you're not going to be getting it all your own way... Fall back plans, preparing for years, all starting to sound a bit Waco now… | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand, if as you state you are a rich Nation why would you not set up a Central Bank & issue your own Scottish pound? Why would you be determined to hang on to a currency you do not control & will have Bank of England all over it? Surely a Bank of Scotland Central Bank & currency would be better than your entire economy hanging on a whim of a foreign Govt? I know you don't understand. We are going round in circles so let's leave it there. Just know that a lot of people in Scotland are going to vote for independence and are quite comfortable with the options open to us. Whatever we choose post independence, it is going to be vastly better than crossing our fingers every four years and hoping another country doesn't vote Tory on our behalf again. " That's right. Give up. Re 'vote Tory'. Don't forget it was the SNP who brought Thatcher to power. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I asked for you to give a definite. As soon as you said "either" you said that you don't know. Is knowing the detail not important to you? If it were me, I would like to know what I'm voting for. Are there definites in your politics? Will the uk be in the eu in 5 years? What will the tax rate be in 10 years? Who will be the prime minister? What will the policy be on Syria? Definites would be great but it's unrealistic. We have a plan of what we want. We have rationale for it and expert back up. We have fallback plans too. I say again, we have been preparing for this for years. " When we have a vote on those things I will look at policy, detail of policy and the nuts and bolts of policy. I will vote accordingly. You seem to be voting willing to vote yes and then find out afterwards what you have voted for! That seems strange and "woefully uninformed" to me. You say you have been preparing for this for years, to me that shows a massive level of incompetence if after all these years they have still not sorted out such a basic thing! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't understand, if as you state you are a rich Nation why would you not set up a Central Bank & issue your own Scottish pound? Why would you be determined to hang on to a currency you do not control & will have Bank of England all over it? Surely a Bank of Scotland Central Bank & currency would be better than your entire economy hanging on a whim of a foreign Govt? I know you don't understand. We are going round in circles so let's leave it there. Just know that a lot of people in Scotland are going to vote for independence and are quite comfortable with the options open to us. Whatever we choose post independence, it is going to be vastly better than crossing our fingers every four years and hoping another country doesn't vote Tory on our behalf again. That's right. Give up. Re 'vote Tory'. Don't forget it was the SNP who brought Thatcher to power." And it was Scotland who gave us brown and Darling! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm glad you are happy to vote for independence without having the relevant facts to hand, i would be screaming for hard information about the direction of the economy, about EU membership,about many things the yes campaign are vague about. I do hope you manage to swing enough voters to take that step with you as i firmly believe the UK will be better of without Scotland in the long term." Completely agree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you don't understand. We are going round in circles so let's leave it there. Just know that a lot of people in Scotland are going to vote for independence and are quite comfortable with the options open to us. Whatever we choose post independence, it is going to be vastly better than crossing our fingers every four years and hoping another country doesn't vote Tory on our behalf again. " See this I totally agree with. I said before that this is a solution to a larger problem. Everything about the current system stinks and I think most Brits no matter which country we are from will agree. The parties, the voting system, the way it all works is outdated and no longer works. I can understand wanting to leave but really we should all be banding together to make the changes needed to sort things out. Maybe I'm being too idealistic now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you don't understand. We are going round in circles so let's leave it there. Just know that a lot of people in Scotland are going to vote for independence and are quite comfortable with the options open to us. Whatever we choose post independence, it is going to be vastly better than crossing our fingers every four years and hoping another country doesn't vote Tory on our behalf again. See this I totally agree with. I said before that this is a solution to a larger problem. Everything about the current system stinks and I think most Brits no matter which country we are from will agree. The parties, the voting system, the way it all works is outdated and no longer works. I can understand wanting to leave but really we should all be banding together to make the changes needed to sort things out. Maybe I'm being too idealistic now." I have to second this... It simply seems that some Scottish people would prefer to take a chance on doing things for themselves...because they're a little tired of the status quo. It seems sensible that Scotland would prefer an amicable divorce...a phasing out of political and economic institutions perhaps... Perhaps, it is those thin bits of thread holding the two countries together if Team Yes wins, that may quite possibly be the root of a reconciliation in the future, should both countries agree to end the trial separation and try again. I hope it's a risk worth taking and can understand the passions of those who wish to take it. Its not usual for folks to cast their votes based on instinct or historical allegiances...whichever way they decide... I hope wise choices are made and both the UK and Scotland prosper, no matter the outcome. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Your previous insistence on calling yes voters "bigots" and today referring to them as "cancerous" tells me all I need to know about you and your rabid British nationalism. I know you are a minority so won't allow it to sour the debate too much. " Yes I called your SNP nationalist attitude bigoted, check back through all your posts and tell me that you would not find many of them offensive and bigoted if they were directed at the Scotts and Holyrood rather than at the English and Westminster? At the same time consider the cankerous mindset you display and your previously declared position that should you fail to get a 'Yes' vote you will continue in your quest to gain independence. Then consider what that means for generations to come until you get your way. Does that sound healthy to you? Does it possibly sound like a malignant festering growth in the body politic? Do you think that maybe my description of your nationalism as a cancer that requires cutting out before it does too much damage is really quite a good analogy? Maybe the reason you keep refusing to acknowledge any of the points I and others make and keep lashing out at me in particular is because you know we are cutting a little too close to the bone for your comfort. Or have I got that wrong too? Maybe you would like to take a little time to think about what is being said here before you reply, or just maybe you should go away and do a little historical reading and find out why heralds were so highly valued in medieval times and compare your reactions here to those of the old Barons when they heard news they did not like. Dont shoot the messenger because you dont like the message! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" See this I totally agree with. I said before that this is a solution to a larger problem. Everything about the current system stinks and I think most Brits no matter which country we are from will agree. The parties, the voting system, the way it all works is outdated and no longer works. I can understand wanting to leave but really we should all be banding together to make the changes needed to sort things out. Maybe I'm being too idealistic now." I think so. It's done. Scotland is a country and we are going in a different direction. If I google Britishness I see nothing I recognise at all or have any connection to. I respect your point of view but it is I think idealistic to think that if we vote no and, perhaps vote labour and just hope it's different this time. We are voting for different things. It's over as a polictical union. I genuinely look forward to stronger social union | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I have to second this... It simply seems that some Scottish people would prefer to take a chance on doing things for themselves...because they're a little tired of the status quo. It seems sensible that Scotland would prefer an amicable divorce...a phasing out of political and economic institutions perhaps... Perhaps, it is those thin bits of thread holding the two countries together if Team Yes wins, that may quite possibly be the root of a reconciliation in the future, should both countries agree to end the trial separation and try again. I hope it's a risk worth taking and can understand the passions of those who wish to take it. Its not usual for folks to cast their votes based on instinct or historical allegiances...whichever way they decide... I hope wise choices are made and both the UK and Scotland prosper, no matter the outcome. " Thanks. Good post. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Debate here on this forum will always be stifled until you get it in your heads that england doesn't own anything. The UK does. And you can accept that it is an equal partnership and split things fairly or you can admit what we have all known which is that things are not fair and not even. It seeps through everything - "not allowed" "can't have." This is hopefully going to happen and all we want is fairness. I understand the doubt about the the currency and we will wait and see on that. A lot of knee jerk "how dare they" stuff going on but I believe this will settle over time and people realise all we wanted was to have our own parliament and taxes and spending. We are accused of wanting to keep the good and get rid of the bad. But it is said as if that is a bad thing - "how dare you want what is good and not want what is bad!" But you are forgetting we own the good. It's ours. All we want is fair share. A lot of people seem to be okay with the situation in Westminster. How subservient is this? Get up off your knees and do something about it! He is selling off your nhs to his pals and associates and all I hear is "but he says this is so, so it must be so". Who is working for who here? Democracy is for the people. We are hopefully gonna so something to make that a little more real. An as for those who wish negative on us for having the audacity to leave the mighty empire, good luck with all you shiny weapons. You are living in the past and we are hopefully gonna move on to something better. " Maybe debate is a little stifled but that us because there is nothing to debate. YOU have no idea on any detail despite preparing for years so how can it be debated. I have seen no one on here say that England owns anything, always the UK. I don't know where you are getting that notion from but I do understand that it may help your justification process. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Maybe debate is a little stifled but that us because there is nothing to debate. YOU have no idea on any detail despite preparing for years so how can it be debated. I have seen no one on here say that England owns anything, always the UK. I don't know where you are getting that notion from but I do understand that it may help your justification process. " Ok. Thanks for your input. Let's see what happens. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You need to look at the bigger picture. Don't simplify it. Ask yourself why the European Union would allow Croatia, Romania and Bulgaria to join but would actively refuse to allow Scotland in for the reason that we democratically chose to leave a nation that we are bigger and richer than and who is about to hold an in/out referendum on membership themselves. It makes no sense. To allow us to be outside the eu, even for a day, is madness. How would the even work? Picture it for god sake! We are eu citizens. We wish to remain so. We leave the eu. We have a year and a half to negotiate our continuation within it. Plenty of experts stating this seems realistic. Opinion to the contrary being dismissed left right and centre including Barosso who appears to have been courting the uk and has been roundly slammed for his comments. " That one statement that you have made is so laughable as to be deemed manic, If and when you declare yourselfs an independent Nation you no longer remain members of the european Union, Its in the European Constitution. Oh and Scotland is bigger than the rest of the UK ?, dunno what map you are looking at. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That one statement that you have made is so laughable as to be deemed manic, If and when you declare yourselfs an independent Nation you no longer remain members of the european Union, Its in the European Constitution. Oh and Scotland is bigger than the rest of the UK ?, dunno what map you are looking at. " Okay I'll let everyone know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" That one statement that you have made is so laughable as to be deemed manic, If and when you declare yourselfs an independent Nation you no longer remain members of the european Union, Its in the European Constitution. Oh and Scotland is bigger than the rest of the UK ?, dunno what map you are looking at. Okay I'll let everyone know. " They should already know, Google EU constitution and Ordnance survey maps | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can anyone explain when Scotland as an independent nation joined the EU ??? The United Kingdom is a member of this,but if Scotland decides to leave,then it becomes a "NEW" independent country. As a new independent nation it will not be a signed member of the EU so will have to apply for membership,in much the same way as all the other "NEW" independent countries have. They are not going to change the rules just to suit Scotland are they ????" I hope this has been answered.... basically an independent scotland would have to negoiate with the EU... under the "copenhagen agreement".... basically scots law would have to be convergent with EU law (which is mostly is already) this is there the likes of Turkey fall down at the moment... the 2nd part the scots (and has the yes side going "la la la not listening) don't like is the Currency stipulation .. which is when scotland reaches certain ecomonic criteria it must join the euro (the Scots seem to think they can get around this as sweden has an opt out at the time.... but that is not true of new countries) then it must be agreed by all EU countries... again greece veto turkey at the moment, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" They should already know, Google EU constitution and Ordnance survey maps" And the land and sea territory map? Chuck that out too? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Duncan, in the previous thread i asked why an independent country would allow another country to set its interest rates by virtue of having the same currency..? And? Did I not answer it? It's our currency too you know. Bank of England is ours too. You know that Bank of England is independent of government right?" Its okay... under duncan the the yes sides plan they will get one seat on the Bank of england Board..... problem is the rUK will get the other 9 seats on the board.... so why would they look out for Scotlands interests over that of rUK? and that is why people are telling you in effect you have have your CU.... but at the price of losing fiscal and macroeconomic control of your own policy...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Its okay... under duncan the the yes sides plan they will get one seat on the Bank of england Board..... problem is the rUK will get the other 9 seats on the board.... so why would they look out for Scotlands interests over that of rUK? and that is why people are telling you in effect you have have your CU.... but at the price of losing fiscal and macroeconomic control of your own policy...... " Oh no! We are gonna lose a percentage of something we have 0% off! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Oh no! We are gonna lose a percentage of something we have 0% off!" in which case why do you want a currency underwritten by something you have "0% off"? see... the problem with the white paper you laud over duncan is that it says currency union is a "temporary arrangement"..... so where does that give rUK stability? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" They should already know, Google EU constitution and Ordnance survey maps And the land and sea territory map? Chuck that out too?" Sorry but where does a sea map come into it, you said Scotland was bigger than the UK, That by default means land mass | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" They should already know, Google EU constitution and Ordnance survey maps And the land and sea territory map? Chuck that out too? Sorry but where does a sea map come into it, you said Scotland was bigger than the UK, That by default means land mass" Mr Salmond insists on including sea cos he believes he can walk on water. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" They should already know, Google EU constitution and Ordnance survey maps And the land and sea territory map? Chuck that out too? Sorry but where does a sea map come into it, you said Scotland was bigger than the UK, That by default means land mass Mr Salmond insists on including sea cos he believes he can walk on water." "Jesus" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this independence freedom thing just reminds me of what would happen if a panda was freed from its cage and allowed to fend for itself. " A fiat ? it would rust away within six months | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this independence freedom thing just reminds me of what would happen if a panda was freed from its cage and allowed to fend for itself. A fiat ? it would rust away within six months " No no no a Chinese fluffy one! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this independence freedom thing just reminds me of what would happen if a panda was freed from its cage and allowed to fend for itself. A fiat ? it would rust away within six months No no no a Chinese fluffy one! " Isn't there one up in Edinburgh zoo? Maybe they should give it its independence and see how the locals cope? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All this independence freedom thing just reminds me of what would happen if a panda was freed from its cage and allowed to fend for itself. A fiat ? it would rust away within six months No no no a Chinese fluffy one! Isn't there one up in Edinburgh zoo? Maybe they should give it its independence and see how the locals cope?" Those pandas cost £600,000 a year - roughly the same as Salmond's pie bill. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh dear! It was all so reasonable when I left the debate. I realise Duncan has been holding the yes vote end up, almost single-handedly, but it really shouldn't descend into a bash Duncan thread. Many bashing one does not make for a fair fight. He has been consistent in his responses so asking him the same questions several times are unlikely to shift his view. Asking the questions is good - we all need to think about the. I propose we start the Fab We Want Answers Campaign ( I failed to come up with something I could call WANK) and start asking them away from this forum. " Much of the critical questioning has come from people who don't have a dog in this fight. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |