FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Rolf Harris etc
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing has been proven so far just allegations by folk coming out of the woodwork some decades ago. I have my own _iews on this but let the real jury decide the outcomes not the fab jury " Amen to that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing has been proven so far just allegations by folk coming out of the woodwork some decades ago. I have my own _iews on this but let the real jury decide the outcomes not the fab jury Amen to that. " Low Salaams to this | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing has been proven so far just allegations by folk coming out of the woodwork some decades ago. I have my own _iews on this but let the real jury decide the outcomes not the fab jury " This | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Question the authorities before they question you!!" Ken Barlow is the papers again today | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Question the authorities before they question you!! Ken Barlow is the papers again today " He is .. You look at them as old men now and wish it was sorted years ago .. well I do and know it was not easy to be open about this years ago. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing has been proven so far just allegations by folk coming out of the woodwork some decades ago. I have my own _iews on this but let the real jury decide the outcomes not the fab jury " Entirely agree that the real jury should decide.'Coming out of the woodwork' suggests you might have made your mind up! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing has been proven so far just allegations by folk coming out of the woodwork some decades ago. I have my own _iews on this but let the real jury decide the outcomes not the fab jury Entirely agree that the real jury should decide.'Coming out of the woodwork' suggests you might have made your mind up!" I have concerns that should anyone in any walk of life is accused of something decades ago if innocent how can you actually prove it. But the jurors will have access to all the evidence and make an inforned decision and that is how it has to be. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have to admit to having a lot of sympathy for all these old men. The fact is that if I was accused of anything 10 years ago never mind in the 60s or 70s my only chance of proving my innocence would be if I could prove beyond doubt that I was somewhere else and that would be down to luck. The fact that with a little research anyone could find where these celebrates were appearing makes them even more vulnerable. It must also be remembered that with the new sentencing rules there is great pressure to plead guilty if you cant prove your innocence beyond all doubt. And as far as I know its not like there are records of complaints to the police at the time that were not acted on (as with Savile). It seems to me be a given we will be seeing lots more cases like these since we have no statute of limitation on sexual crimes. " I have a lot of sympathy for these men if they are innocent | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"all i will say on the matter is that mud sticks and if theses guys are found not guilty people will still have their doubts . names should not be published for ppl to ridicule until it is proven that they are guilty" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"all i will say on the matter is that mud sticks and if theses guys are found not guilty people will still have their doubts . names should not be published for ppl to ridicule until it is proven that they are guilty" I assume you mean for all defendants, not just 'celebrities' and for all criminal charges? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i have 'sympathy' with anyone wrongly accused, would imagine it is absolutely traumatic beyond most of our understanding.. with Stuart Hall there was a bit more than just knowing where he was on x,y or z day and night.. mostly i have the greatest empathy for victims who confided in family or the 'authorities' decades ago only to have their story ignored or told 'they are just too powerfull/rich' to go up against in a Court of Law.. the levels of conviction for sexual assault should be an area of national concern, that folks choose not to come forward for a lack of faith in the system needs addressing.. " The low level of conviction is probably more to do with the difficulty in securing sufficient evidence and the longer the interval between alleged offence and complaint, the harder it gets. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is anyone else starting to wonder who HASN'T been up to no good?" Or falsely accused...... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"all i will say on the matter is that mud sticks and if theses guys are found not guilty people will still have their doubts . names should not be published for ppl to ridicule until it is proven that they are guilty" And if they are found not guilty automatically name, shame and prosecute the false accuser. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"all i will say on the matter is that mud sticks and if theses guys are found not guilty people will still have their doubts . names should not be published for ppl to ridicule until it is proven that they are guilty And if they are found not guilty automatically name, shame and prosecute the false accuser." Criminal charges are not allegations only brought by the accuser. They are charges being brought on the public's behalf by the Police and Prosecution services | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"all i will say on the matter is that mud sticks and if theses guys are found not guilty people will still have their doubts . names should not be published for ppl to ridicule until it is proven that they are guilty And if they are found not guilty automatically name, shame and prosecute the false accuser. Criminal charges are not allegations only brought by the accuser. They are charges being brought on the public's behalf by the Police and Prosecution services" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is anyone else starting to wonder who HASN'T been up to no good?" seems to have become a bit of a witch hunt:-the police dropped the ball re saville and now they seem to be trying to over compensate to make amends | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We are all innocent until proven otherwise. Along with this, it is a real shame we can't say anonymous until proven too, regardless of what it might be and fir whoever it might be. How many times have we seen a person's character destroyed, only for them to be in fact found innocent. Stopping media attention in court however would need a root and branch reform. At the moment, it's a cheap and effective way to fill column inches. Don't get me started on the media x" Look at the shit that bloke from Coronation Street went through, only to be vindicated in court. The sad thing is, I don't know his name (I think its Kevin on the show) but I know what he was accused of. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I, for one, would not like to be in the juries of these trials. " Me either... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If they're found guilty, they'll face 'jail justice'. Those guys are not find of rapists and peodophiles. I do believe there's no smoke without fire but equally there's always a media feeding frenzy that will destroy a mans whole life wether he's innocent or guilty. I'll reserve judgment until the trial but there must be something fishy going on. " Well , it takes the heat off anyone in government being in the dock......... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We are all innocent until proven otherwise. Along with this, it is a real shame we can't say anonymous until proven too, regardless of what it might be and fir whoever it might be. How many times have we seen a person's character destroyed, only for them to be in fact found innocent. Stopping media attention in court however would need a root and branch reform. At the moment, it's a cheap and effective way to fill column inches. Don't get me started on the media x Look at the shit that bloke from Coronation Street went through, only to be vindicated in court. The sad thing is, I don't know his name (I think its Kevin on the show) but I know what he was accused of." Michael Le Vell ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Amazing how people forgive and forget. How quickly did everyone forget that Michael Jackson was a paedo pervert. Child molesters I hope they all die before their time. Rant over" Was anything ever proven about M.J. ? I thought it wasn't. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is anyone else starting to wonder who HASN'T been up to no good?" people who live in a glass house shouldn't throw stones, to many swinging, cheating and adultery are wrong | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"How quickly did everyone forget that Michael Jackson was a paedo pervert. " No he wasn't. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is anyone else starting to wonder who HASN'T been up to no good? people who live in a glass house shouldn't throw stones, to many swinging, cheating and adultery are wrong" WHAT? Though in the interests of balance can i suggest adding homosexuality and crossdressing to your list. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"we dont know if any of its true or not of course, but jim davidson said if he hadnt been able to prove where he was at the time the offences were meant to have taken place all those years ago he doesnt know what would have happened. how many people can say and prove where they were on the exact date and year." This is the major problem, if you are not guilty or something specific happened, it would be very lucky to know where you were on a certain day 40 months ago let alone years. Not sure a fair trial for either side is possible after so long. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I, for one, would not like to be in the juries of these trials. " Why not? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I, for one, would not like to be in the juries of these trials. Why not?" At least if you served on the jury, you'd be able to form an opinion based on ALL the evidence led, not just what you've read/ seen in the media. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We are all innocent until proven otherwise. Along with this, it is a real shame we can't say anonymous until proven too, regardless of what it might be and fir whoever it might be. How many times have we seen a person's character destroyed, only for them to be in fact found innocent. Stopping media attention in court however would need a root and branch reform. At the moment, it's a cheap and effective way to fill column inches. Don't get me started on the media x Look at the shit that bloke from Coronation Street went through, only to be vindicated in court. The sad thing is, I don't know his name (I think its Kevin on the show) but I know what he was accused of. Michael Le Vell ?" Probably, I dunno! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"we dont know if any of its true or not of course, but jim davidson said if he hadnt been able to prove where he was at the time the offences were meant to have taken place all those years ago he doesnt know what would have happened. how many people can say and prove where they were on the exact date and year. This is the major problem, if you are not guilty or something specific happened, it would be very lucky to know where you were on a certain day 40 months ago let alone years. Not sure a fair trial for either side is possible after so long. " The reason Stuart Hall was charged was nothing to do with dates but because the accusers all documented similar patterns of behavior and clearly couldn't have known each other. I wouldn't believe a word Jim Davidson said regarding why the charges were dropped, I'm not sure that CPS even make it known to the accused as to why the charges are not taken forward. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing has been proven so far just allegations by folk coming out of the woodwork some decades ago. I have my own _iews on this but let the real jury decide the outcomes not the fab jury " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I, for one, would not like to be in the juries of these trials. Why not? At least if you served on the jury, you'd be able to form an opinion based on ALL the evidence led, not just what you've read/ seen in the media." Hear the evidence then guilty or not guilty just like any other court case. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"............ The reason Stuart Hall was charged was nothing to do with dates but because the accusers all documented similar patterns of behavior and clearly couldn't have known each other. ............" Don't many of them share the same solicitor? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is anyone else starting to wonder who HASN'T been up to no good? people who live in a glass house shouldn't throw stones, to many swinging, cheating and adultery are wrong WHAT? Though in the interests of balance can i suggest adding homosexuality and crossdressing to your list. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps " There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all" Well, if its on the David Icke forum, it must be true. Not sure about spelling of Icke. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all" I think it's easy for people to try and dismiss the people on the David Icke site as crazy conspiracy theorists, until you remember that they were spot on with Jimmy Saville | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all" the word excellent is probably not something i would associate with unfounded clap trap by someone with less credibility to most than santa.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"we dont know if any of its true or not of course, but jim davidson said if he hadnt been able to prove where he was at the time the offences were meant to have taken place all those years ago he doesnt know what would have happened. how many people can say and prove where they were on the exact date and year. This is the major problem, if you are not guilty or something specific happened, it would be very lucky to know where you were on a certain day 40 months ago let alone years. Not sure a fair trial for either side is possible after so long. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all I think it's easy for people to try and dismiss the people on the David Icke site as crazy conspiracy theorists, until you remember that they were spot on with Jimmy Saville" But lots of people were saying things about Saville over the years. It was on hundreds of sites. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all I think it's easy for people to try and dismiss the people on the David Icke site as crazy conspiracy theorists, until you remember that they were spot on with Jimmy Saville" Even a broken clock is right twice a day. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all the word excellent is probably not something i would associate with unfounded clap trap by someone with less credibility to most than santa.." Most of the research is from information out there, from photos, it's not clap trap, some threads maybe but you get claptrap threads on all sites They are piecing everything together, haven't been on that thread for ages, not nice things to read. Like this female mp who is alleged yo have abused boys who's associated with guys that did snuff movies in Holland etc and the mps who were part of the paedophile information exchange where they would meet at a guest house. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Smoke and mirrors and yes they probably have been up to no good. Can't wait for them to start rounding up the mps There is some excelent research fone on the jimmy Saville thread on the David icke forum. Some of it totally shocking, haven't been on there for a while, but there's reports of a female mp abusing children and other ex mps. It is sickening the total depravity of it all I think it's easy for people to try and dismiss the people on the David Icke site as crazy conspiracy theorists, until you remember that they were spot on with Jimmy Saville" If your using a gatling gun, sooner or later,your gonna hit something. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"just a word of warning:-be careful what you say or imply about anybody,remember the twitter fiasco re Lord McAlpine,if you post anything defamatory about anybody that is proven to be later untrue you can be held accountable in a libel suit and the lawyers now have the power to make sites reveal who you are" hasn't the law on libel been changed recently, in effect to reduce the number of cases and to stop the Uk being the libel capital of the world, to the effect that anyone pursuing libel has to show a much greater effect of the harm done? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Most of the research is from information out there, from photos, it's not clap trap, some threads maybe but you get claptrap threads on all sites They are piecing everything together, haven't been on that thread for ages, not nice things to read. Like this female mp who is alleged yo have abused boys who's associated with guys that did snuff movies in Holland etc and the mps who were part of the paedophile information exchange where they would meet at a guest house. " so its not claptrap yet some bits are..? if the info is 'out there' are we talikng about the web or tittle tattle ..? suppose chucking unfounded allegations about is fine if they're an MP as some of them fiddled their expenses..? what if it was your brother, sister, son etc.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is anyone else starting to wonder who HASN'T been up to no good?" Apparently there is an arrest warrant out for the 1970s | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Most of the research is from information out there, from photos, it's not clap trap, some threads maybe but you get claptrap threads on all sites They are piecing everything together, haven't been on that thread for ages, not nice things to read. Like this female mp who is alleged yo have abused boys who's associated with guys that did snuff movies in Holland etc and the mps who were part of the paedophile information exchange where they would meet at a guest house. so its not claptrap yet some bits are..? if the info is 'out there' are we talikng about the web or tittle tattle ..? suppose chucking unfounded allegations about is fine if they're an MP as some of them fiddled their expenses..? what if it was your brother, sister, son etc.. " The info is out there hidden in plain sight, from clippings of newspaper articles, magazines and news reports. Just like the female mp, not sure or have looked on who it is, but her acquaintances I read about last year, which was despicable things. Its a massive jigsaw and a total headfuck too. Like I said haven't been on that thread for over a year and worms are slowly coming out if the can. As to will we ever get to the bottom of it I don't really know, but that Saville was well connected. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing has been proven so far just allegations by folk coming out of the woodwork some decades ago. I have my own _iews on this but let the real jury decide the outcomes not the fab jury " hear hear | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Amazing how people forgive and forget. How quickly did everyone forget that Michael Jackson was a paedo pervert. Child molesters I hope they all die before their time. Rant over Was anything ever proven about M.J. ? I thought it wasn't." He was found not guilty on all counts. But hey, let's forget that and demonise him anyway. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Amazing how people forgive and forget. How quickly did everyone forget that Michael Jackson was a paedo pervert. Child molesters I hope they all die before their time. Rant over Was anything ever proven about M.J. ? I thought it wasn't. He was found not guilty on all counts. But hey, let's forget that and demonise him anyway. " Isn't that what they did with Savile? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |