 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Amazed but not suprised to read a terror suspect said to be under a tpim formerly known as control orders and under surveillance walked into mosque came out with burkha on and has vanished.
Police say he is not a direct threat yet not to approach him pardon me but he is on terrism watch list so how can he not be deemed as a threat.
In addition to basic questions as to he has vanished is fact he got a burkha from mosque yet as far as i know women are not allowed in mosques so therefore someone must have aided him.
Makes it hard for the ship em home brigade as he is uk citizen.
I do not profess to know an answer to this problem but surely something has to happen. The courts decided control orders were wrong by keeping someone indefinetly under house arrest or surveillance for years without having been charged and whilst its right onnocent till proven guilty is or should be the norm he was put under the tpim for what security forces deemed as a threat to the uk.
Before folk start blaming the european courts again we are part of it plus our own supreme court said control orders were not fit for purpose. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Amazed but not suprised to read a terror suspect said to be under a tpim formerly known as control orders and under surveillance walked into mosque came out with burkha on and has vanished.
Police say he is not a direct threat yet not to approach him pardon me but he is on terrism watch list so how can he not be deemed as a threat.
In addition to basic questions as to he has vanished is fact he got a burkha from mosque yet as far as i know women are not allowed in mosques so therefore someone must have aided him.
Makes it hard for the ship em home brigade as he is uk citizen.
I do not profess to know an answer to this problem but surely something has to happen. The courts decided control orders were wrong by keeping someone indefinetly under house arrest or surveillance for years without having been charged and whilst its right onnocent till proven guilty is or should be the norm he was put under the tpim for what security forces deemed as a threat to the uk.
Before folk start blaming the european courts again we are part of it plus our own supreme court said control orders were not fit for purpose."
Women are allowed in some mosques at certain times of the week |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Amazed but not suprised to read a terror suspect said to be under a tpim formerly known as control orders and under surveillance walked into mosque came out with burkha on and has vanished.
Police say he is not a direct threat yet not to approach him pardon me but he is on terrism watch list so how can he not be deemed as a threat.
In addition to basic questions as to he has vanished is fact he got a burkha from mosque yet as far as i know women are not allowed in mosques so therefore someone must have aided him.
Makes it hard for the ship em home brigade as he is uk citizen.
I do not profess to know an answer to this problem but surely something has to happen. The courts decided control orders were wrong by keeping someone indefinetly under house arrest or surveillance for years without having been charged and whilst its right onnocent till proven guilty is or should be the norm he was put under the tpim for what security forces deemed as a threat to the uk.
Before folk start blaming the european courts again we are part of it plus our own supreme court said control orders were not fit for purpose."
It's thought he fought on front line in Somalia
Would seems his loyalties are not to the UK
Surely to be given a British passport yet fight in your country of origin are not compatable
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Amazed but not suprised to read a terror suspect said to be under a tpim formerly known as control orders and under surveillance walked into mosque came out with burkha on and has vanished.
Police say he is not a direct threat yet not to approach him pardon me but he is on terrism watch list so how can he not be deemed as a threat.
In addition to basic questions as to he has vanished is fact he got a burkha from mosque yet as far as i know women are not allowed in mosques so therefore someone must have aided him.
Makes it hard for the ship em home brigade as he is uk citizen.
I do not profess to know an answer to this problem but surely something has to happen. The courts decided control orders were wrong by keeping someone indefinetly under house arrest or surveillance for years without having been charged and whilst its right onnocent till proven guilty is or should be the norm he was put under the tpim for what security forces deemed as a threat to the uk.
Before folk start blaming the european courts again we are part of it plus our own supreme court said control orders were not fit for purpose.
It's thought he fought on front line in Somalia
Would seems his loyalties are not to the UK
Surely to be given a British passport yet fight in your country of origin are not compatable
"
Agreed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I feel a lot safer knowing its only one !  "
There is another on the loose who escaped last year under similar circumstances and not been found yet. Also linked to latest chap as part of same jihadist group.
Theresa may should step down over this but no doubt some minnow will be sacrificed as she is touted as possible tory leader.
Hey ho i am not knocking security services as no doubt they disprupt lots of potential threats but the surveillance kevel needs revisiting. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
