So a royal charter has been signed which heralds in constitutional regulation of the press.
But is it an attempt to reign in outrageous behaviour by the press or simply an attempt by politicians to gag the press from exposing things they would rather keep secret.
Who do you believe ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So a royal charter has been signed which heralds in constitutional regulation of the press.
But is it an attempt to reign in outrageous behaviour by the press or simply an attempt by politicians to gag the press from exposing things they would rather keep secret.
There goes freedom of speech! And if they regulate then it just leaves it open for more conspiracy theorists to harbour higher opinions on the real going ons
Who do you believe ?"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I believe myself, and don't buy or read papers or watch a television, they are means for the rich to control the poor, same as religion."
Yeah. Those tele-tubbies are mind warping bastards!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I believe myself, and don't buy or read papers or watch a television, they are means for the rich to control the poor, same as religion.
Yeah. Those tele-tubbies are mind warping bastards! "
childrens programmes are funded by big business, children are the consumers of tomorrow, so are just being groomed to want certain things, money doesn't grow on trees, without a profit motive there would be no telly tubbies. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I believe myself, and don't buy or read papers or watch a television, they are means for the rich to control the poor, same as religion.
Yeah. Those tele-tubbies are mind warping bastards!
childrens programmes are funded by big business, children are the consumers of tomorrow, so are just being groomed to want certain things, money doesn't grow on trees, without a profit motive there would be no telly tubbies."
What about the magic roundabout? Was that funded by a south american drug cartel? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"................
What about the magic roundabout? Was that funded by a south american drug cartel?
And Columbia Records."
That rabbit did always look stoned now you mention it !  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *nnyMan
over a year ago
Glasgow |
"................
What about the magic roundabout? Was that funded by a south american drug cartel?
And Columbia Records.
That rabbit did always look stoned now you mention it ! "
The Answer, as always, is Blowin' in the Wind. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Apologies OP , your thread got somewhat Hyjacked ...I no longer read newspapers or watch MsM news , ...I do feel for the real journalists who simply wish to report the truth ....we live in the days of injuction ...super injunction ..and D notice ...no wonder people are turning to alternative means to acquire the truth ...as for the charter ?...I really don't see it making an iota of difference ...sadly  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So a royal charter has been signed which heralds in constitutional regulation of the press.
But is it an attempt to reign in outrageous behaviour by the press or simply an attempt by politicians to gag the press from exposing things they would rather keep secret.
Who do you believe ?"
I dont believe any of them they are all putting on a show and not telling all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So a royal charter has been signed which heralds in constitutional regulation of the press.
But is it an attempt to reign in outrageous behaviour by the press or simply an attempt by politicians to gag the press from exposing things they would rather keep secret.
Who do you believe ?"
Its probably a bit of both they are both exaggerating things but ultimately its not right as it its now so we need change. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
