FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Can we challenge the royal family?

Can we challenge the royal family?

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

I was wandering how back in the day the royal family no doubt would have claimed the throne through fighting. But now, this is quite unlikely to happen and the royal family never be challenged! Does anybody think the 'royal' spot should be offered to another family? Or be able to legally challenge the royal family for the throne?

Don't worry, I don't want to overthrow our queen, god bless her! But just thought it's wrong that we should stick with the same family

For the sake of tradition! Thoughts please.....:D

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *iamondsmiles.Woman over a year ago

little house on the praire

quite happy with the one we got

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *nnyMan over a year ago

Glasgow

You might end up with the Royle Family.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You might end up with the Royle Family."

Cant bleed us dry as much as current crew.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You might end up with the Royle Family."

LMAO

I wouldn't mind challenging our whole political system, though!!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I was wandering how back in the day the royal family no doubt would have claimed the throne through fighting. But now, this is quite unlikely to happen and the royal family never be challenged! Does anybody think the 'royal' spot should be offered to another family? Or be able to legally challenge the royal family for the throne?

Don't worry, I don't want to overthrow our queen, god bless her! But just thought it's wrong that we should stick with the same family

For the sake of tradition! Thoughts please.....:D "

I can just see Prince Mcaulay and princess Beyonce Queen Shaz and King Daz's kids. Tourism for the royals would be as appealing as going to Grimy on a wet weekend.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Do it as a form of family jury service. Every family that gets picked has to do three years. Then at the end, bung them a couple of million and they don't need to work again. And it's still cheaper than the ones we have now.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"You might end up with the Royle Family.

Cant bleed us dry as much as current crew."

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *nnyMan over a year ago

Glasgow

Remember we've only got this bunch because of the abdication.

If Wallis Simpson hadn't existed, we'd have had a Monarch who was pro-German in the 30s.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Don't worry, I don't want to overthrow our queen, god bless her! But just thought it's wrong that we should stick with the same family

For the sake of tradition! Thoughts please.....:D

I can just see Prince Mcaulay and princess Beyonce Queen Shaz and King Daz's kids. Tourism for the royals would be as appealing as going to Grimy on a wet weekend.

If people our coming to our country for the royal family, there's something very wrong with us!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Careful, that's treason.

I'm not bothered about the royals and having a new family every 3 years would just get annoying.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *nnyMan over a year ago

Glasgow

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard."

Treason went in1998.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Remember we've only got this bunch because of the abdication.

If Wallis Simpson hadn't existed, we'd have had a Monarch who was pro-German in the 30s."

I'm talking about the current family, not how they got there! I just believe I should be able to legally say to the royal family 'I challenge you for the throne!' No need for fighting, just maybe a 'thumb war' or rock, paper, scissors?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *eryBigGirlWoman over a year ago

East Yorkshire

"You might end up with the Royle Family.

Cant bleed us dry as much as current crew."

They cost you (assuming you are a tax payer) 53p last year which is a 1p rise on the year before and the royal family pretty much bring in as much tourist revenue to the country as they cost!!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"You might end up with the Royle Family.

Cant bleed us dry as much as current crew.

They cost you (assuming you are a tax payer) 53p last year which is a 1p rise on the year before and the royal family pretty much bring in as much tourist revenue to the country as they cost!!"

Just how exactly is the revenue for tourists that only came for the royal family actually calculated? Or is it presumed so we can carry on paying them for doing nothing?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard."

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung."

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 24/10/13 00:49:55]

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 24/10/13 00:53:19]

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Well...I don't think one person can RULE another without their permission..I am my own ruler, because I know what's best for me!

I'd vote for Overthrow and execute!! But them I'm a merciful wee soul!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

Come to think of it William Wallace was hung, drawn and quartered for treason wasn't he? Looking back to when the laws for treason were written it varies from documentation but i don't think they had grammar police to pull them up then.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

Yeah exactly.

My grammar isn't the best it never has been.

But this ain't the first time she has come up behind me and oddly, I don't think it's going to be the last either.

Though one can dream.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Remember we've only got this bunch because of the abdication.

If Wallis Simpson hadn't existed, we'd have had a Monarch who was pro-German in the 30s."

At least we'd have a decent transport system then.....& cheaper..........& we wouldn't be skint........&???????

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *nnyMan over a year ago

Glasgow

Might as well be hung for a sheep as a goat.

Suggests hung might have been proper usage at one time.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I think I should be the next king better than what we have I would turn buck palace into a swingers club

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

Yeah exactly.

My grammar isn't the best it never has been.

But this ain't the first time she has come up behind me and oddly, I don't think it's going to be the last either.

Though one can dream.

I don't think I've corrected you on anything before

Point out where or frankly I call bollocks.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

Yeah exactly.

My grammar isn't the best it never has been.

But this ain't the first time she has come up behind me and oddly, I don't think it's going to be the last either.

Though one can dream.

I wish some people would accept the jist and flavour of the posts that people make rather than picking holes in them

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

But since we're talking about stalking, how unusual for Monte to turn up to slate me.

I didn't realise you were part of the little gang GreedyThump but it certainly explains your strop.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

Yeah exactly.

My grammar isn't the best it never has been.

But this ain't the first time she has come up behind me and oddly, I don't think it's going to be the last either.

Though one can dream.

I wish some people would accept the jist and flavour of the posts that people make rather than picking holes in them

It was meant as information actually.

I didn't write OMG how thick are you, don't you know it's hanged? because that's not what I meant.

If I was using a word incorrectly, and it happens, I'd prefer someone told me, personally. How'd I know otherwise?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I wish some people would accept the jist and flavour of the posts that people make rather than picking holes in them

I concur!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *nnyMan over a year ago

Glasgow

I think I hear my house-girl turning down my bed.

G'night

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I don't think I've corrected you on anything before

Point out where or frankly I call bollocks."

Ooo...nicely played!

*awaits return fire with interest*

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

But since we're talking about stalking, how unusual for Monte to turn up to slate me.

I didn't realise you were part of the little gang GreedyThump but it certainly explains your strop."

Excuse me??? I know you like to gang up on people god knows you have done it often enough. The question you should answer is why you felt the need to troll back through the thread to pick someone up on supposed grammar! Is your life in such a state you get inane pleasure in trying to put someone down in such a petty puerile way?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

You do realise the family name is Sax-Coburg and are german descent from George the 1st.

They became Windsor at the outbreak of WW1

And yes Edward the 8th was a socialist sympathiser who agreed with some of the nazi ideals but fortunately the monarchy has no power to affect law in this country since Charles the 1st

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

But since we're talking about stalking, how unusual for Monte to turn up to slate me.

I didn't realise you were part of the little gang GreedyThump but it certainly explains your strop.

How can one person "gang" up on anyone? It's not me with the little mob.

As for putting anyone down, er, where exactly?

I pointed out that hanged is used when referring to capital punishment. There was no insult, no putting anyone down, just a statement of fact.

I didn't realise that your mate was another of the prissy can't be seen to be wrong types that would take that as an insult.

I love the accusation of stalking though. I'm waiting for the evidence of that. I can hardly remember a damned thing he's posted, never mind followed him round the site looking for him to make a mistake.

In fact, take a look at the recent grammar police posts. You'll find me strangely absent.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

Oh, and posting a comment 20 minutes after an earlier one is "trolling back through" the thread looking for something to criticise? Please.

I replied to the post when I saw it, as I was reading through more recent additions to the thread.

No doubt some people will like to know that hanged is the correct word. That you choose to take it as an insult is interesting though.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

I don't think I've corrected you on anything before

Point out where or frankly I call bollocks.

Ooo...nicely played!

*awaits return fire with interest*

He won't find evidence of me stalking him round the site pouncing on his ever mistake because I barely know who he is.

Some people really do over-react.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Fuck me!

My blocklist just got bigger.

Some people seem a bit er troubled.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

/I'm out.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 24/10/13 01:23:10]

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"ermmm..cough!

You can still legally be hung for "Treason" in the UK.

It's the only thing you can still get the Death Penalty for..so I heard.

Hanged. When you're talking about people, the term is hanged, not hung.

I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar.

My grammar sucks balls I know that.

Ta.

I thought it was a bit unnecessary and fail to see the reason for doing it. The action is 'hung' the point was clear and to be honest my grammar is pretty good and would have used hung myself.

But since we're talking about stalking, how unusual for Monte to turn up to slate me.

I didn't realise you were part of the little gang GreedyThump but it certainly explains your strop.

How can one person "gang" up on anyone? It's not me with the little mob.

As for putting anyone down, er, where exactly?

I pointed out that hanged is used when referring to capital punishment. There was no insult, no putting anyone down, just a statement of fact.

I didn't realise that your mate was another of the prissy can't be seen to be wrong types that would take that as an insult.

In fact, take a look at the recent grammar police posts. You'll find me strangely absent."

Christ are you really so insensitive on your actions to realise how you offended another poster? Words fail me they really do! As for what you have or haven't done and proving things from this profile or your previous Tiger Feet one well I don't have to prove to someone who tries to play the victim after being so pedantic to another use which caused people to respond. Wake up! People read threads and have a mind of their own and will comment on objectionable and petty put downs.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

I'm still waiting to see this evidence of me stalking him round the site.

Until then this is nothing more than an attempt to make a mountain out of nothing at all just to incite trouble.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

Offended?

Yeah right. Or just an excuse to make up a false claim of stalking to try to stir up trouble. It is, after all, what your mob are known for. Where are the rest of them by the way? A bit slow to answer the summons tonight.

I'm the one falsely accused here, not him. I won't be getting my panties in a bunch over it though.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

Haha, just noticed the "I don't have to prove" bit of that post.

I don't have to prove = I can't prove and I know it.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

What the fuck just happened?

(Proof read 3 times to check for mistakes)

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *orny69pussyCouple over a year ago

Tonbridge

Historically the Royals were challenged due to tyrannical actions or takeovers from foreigners. But they lost their right through government to have any real power a long time ago.

IMO its the politicians that need taking down a peg or two, not the Royal family!!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Offended?

I'm the one falsely accused here, not him. I won't be getting my panties in a bunch over it though."

You are in denial you don't want to face the fact you were being pedantic and petty and are doing everything possible to acknowledge your action wasn't really necessary. Falsely accused well I think the fact your actions offended thump to the point he posted as he did was enough.Forget the stalking and explain why you feel the need to correct the grammar as its plain thats something you are doing all you can to avoid explaining!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *orny69pussyCouple over a year ago

Tonbridge

"Remember we've only got this bunch because of the abdication.

If Wallis Simpson hadn't existed, we'd have had a Monarch who was pro-German in the 30s."

Yea but he didn't have any kids, so would still have gone to our current Monarchy.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"What the fuck just happened?

(Proof read 3 times to check for mistakes) "

I posted a fact about the English language.

GreedyThump took it as an insult and made an accusation he can't back up because it's completely untrue. Monte waded in because he never likes to miss a chance to have a go at me and paint me as some kind of satanic spawn.

As yet no proof of any of their claims has been provided.

That's about it.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"What the fuck just happened?

(Proof read 3 times to check for mistakes)

I posted a fact about the English language.

As yet no proof of any of their claims has been provided.

That's about it."

Its not about you its about your comments so get it real. You still haven't explained why you had to go all grammar police on Thumps comments you are realty trying to avoid explaining why you felt the need.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"Haha, just noticed the "I don't have to prove" bit of that post.

I don't have to prove = I can't prove and I know it.

Did you not delete your Tiger Feet profile after your ban? So those posts are out and in reality its not the issue its your grammar police action that you are clearly avoiding explaining. "

Monte, what are you on about?

What grammar police action?

GreedyThump has accused me of stalking him round to correct his grammar. I'd genuinely love to see where I've done that.

I rarely comment on people's grammar on here. Like I said, take a look at some of the threads where people were criticised, you won't find me there.

I know you have some sort of bee in your bonnet with me, and I honestly could not care less. But if you'd like to make me out to have done something wrong, at least try to make it something I have done rather than using you usual approach of throwing up a smoke-screen and then fanning it to make it look like flames.

So come on, pony up. If I am the grammar police, show me where.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Historically the Royals were challenged due to tyrannical actions or takeovers from foreigners. But they lost their right through government to have any real power a long time ago.

IMO its the politicians that need taking down a peg or two, not the Royal family!!"

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"What the fuck just happened?

(Proof read 3 times to check for mistakes)

I posted a fact about the English language.

As yet no proof of any of their claims has been provided.

That's about it.

There's nothing to avoid explaining.

I made a comment about the English language. There was nothing derogatory in that comment.

If GT took it as an insult then he needs to deal with his insecurity issues.

As usual you are trying to create something out of nothing and pick a fight.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

I'm not dragging this thread any further off topic over this nonsense.

I'm still waiting for you, Monte, and your mate GT to back up the accusations you've made. I won't hold my breath though.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 24/10/13 02:05:01]

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Haha, just noticed the "I don't have to prove" bit of that post.

I don't have to prove = I can't prove and I know it.

Did you not delete your Tiger Feet profile after your ban? So those posts are out and in reality its not the issue its your grammar police action that you are clearly avoiding explaining.

Monte, what are you on about?

What grammar police action?

GreedyThump has accused me of stalking him round to correct his grammar. I'd genuinely love to see where I've done that.

I rarely comment on people's grammar on here. Like I said, take a look at some of the threads where people were criticised, you won't find me there.

So come on, pony up. If I am the grammar police, show me where."

Your imagination knows no bounds!

Thump commented he was fucked off with you coming up behind him in threads to pull him up on his grammar. Which you did in this thread no matter how much you deny it its there in black and white when you pulled him up pointing out its the word hanged not hung going back 9 post to do so. Now firstly it wasn't needed it served no purpose apart from upsetting thump its clear by his reaction he felt put down and its pretty clear that is the most likely intention.

Facts you posted it and you concentrate on going for proof on other threads? Frankly thats avoidance along with the fact you fictitiously make up things about me which frankly is B/S but its a diversion tactic on your part.

Live and learn if you are unplesent to people people to the point they feel its personal and others see it then expect people reading to comment. Its the way forums work not some fictitious vendetta although I am beginning to think this nit picking on people is closer to home for you.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

If there's nothing nice to say don't say anything

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *orny69pussyCouple over a year ago

Tonbridge

So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

Awww and I was going to put my name forward

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

LMAO

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

GT:

"I'm getting a bit fucked off with you coming up behind me in threads to pull me up on my grammar."

"this ain't the first time she has come up behind me and oddly, I don't think it's going to be the last either."

Monte:

" I know you like to gang up on people god knows you have done it often enough. "

You two have made this about other threads with the above two untrue accusations, amongst others.

I'm well aware of your tactics Monte, you're trying to drag this off topic and stir something up into nothing. How soon before you run off to the mods/admin to complain? Or get one of the gang to do it?

I posted a fact about English. Any put down has come from the imagination of GT and he made it into something it isn't by claiming I have followed him around and done this before, which is not true. That coloured people's reactions, just as it was intended to. Always fanning the smoke, you and your mob.

I'd quite happily apologise to GT for the offence that I unintentionally caused if he hadn't made a completely untrue accusation. I doubt he's man enough to admit he's wrong though and apologise to me.

Any diversion tactics being used here are yours, as usual. Enough already.

Sorry to everybody else for dragging this off topic. I've nothing more to say on the matter. Please don't let the accusations made against me colour your judgement. Feel free to look through my posting history and see for yourselves that the claims made are simply untrue. Monte subscribes to the theory that mud sticks.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

I don't think we really have much choice anyway. Raising an army large enough to defeat HM's forces on the quiet would be, well, unlikely!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

I don't think we really have much choice anyway. Raising an army large enough to defeat HM's forces on the quiet would be, well, unlikely!

"
id be the first to enlist

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *orny69pussyCouple over a year ago

Tonbridge

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

I don't think we really have much choice anyway. Raising an army large enough to defeat HM's forces on the quiet would be, well, unlikely!

id be the first to enlist "

I'd be the first to resist! Did I spell all that proper like?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

I don't think we really have much choice anyway. Raising an army large enough to defeat HM's forces on the quiet would be, well, unlikely!

id be the first to enlist "

Ooh, ooh I'll do the medical!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

I don't think we really have much choice anyway. Raising an army large enough to defeat HM's forces on the quiet would be, well, unlikely!

id be the first to enlist

I'd be the first to resist! Did I spell all that proper like?

Sounds about right to me. Are you resisting the current royal family, a new royal family or Batonesque? Are handcuffs required? Rusty has his out on the night shift thread

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *orny69pussyCouple over a year ago

Tonbridge

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

I don't think we really have much choice anyway. Raising an army large enough to defeat HM's forces on the quiet would be, well, unlikely!

id be the first to enlist

I'd be the first to resist! Did I spell all that proper like?

Sounds about right to me. Are you resisting the current royal family, a new royal family or Batonesque? Are handcuffs required? Rusty has his out on the night shift thread

I'm resisting any resistance

Might take a cock in my mouth to shut me up

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"So if the choices of a new Royal family are on here.. can we please keep the ones we got!!!

I don't think we really have much choice anyway. Raising an army large enough to defeat HM's forces on the quiet would be, well, unlikely!

id be the first to enlist

I'd be the first to resist! Did I spell all that proper like?

Sounds about right to me. Are you resisting the current royal family, a new royal family or Batonesque? Are handcuffs required? Rusty has his out on the night shift thread

I'm resisting any resistance

Might take a cock in my mouth to shut me up

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

All hail king boris

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"All hail king boris

Oh dear deity, no!!!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"All hail king boris

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

All just got a bit war like on here!!

That's the fighting spirit! No all to London, follow me :D

Dress in what u want, and dildos at the ready, someone is gonna get a battering :D x

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Is now a good time to point out that 'hanged' and 'hung' are equally acceptable grammatically?

Unless you're talking about a cock.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ee VianteWoman over a year ago

Somewhere in North Norfolk

"Is now a good time to point out that 'hanged' and 'hung' are equally acceptable grammatically?

Unless you're talking about a cock."

Check quality British media and writers and see how many times 'hung' is used when referring to a person.

They used to be more or less interchangeable but this changed over time.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

VIVA LA RESISTANCE !!

don't mind the royals actually

queen Liz - who else can pull off that wave

prince Philip - his banter is wicked

prince William - he pulled Kate ffs

Prince harry - the guys a legend in his own right

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *bbandflowCouple over a year ago

South Devon

"VIVA LA RESISTANCE !!

don't mind the royals actually

queen Liz - who else can pull off that wave

prince Philip - his banter is wicked

prince William - he pulled Kate ffs

Prince harry - the guys a legend in his own right

He 'pulled' Kate..lol..

Royals don't pull

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *cottishsexgoddessWoman over a year ago

Glenrothes

My mum always pulled me up on the "hung" "hanged" issue. I was told paintings are hung, men are hanged! But like everything else over time, grammar and pronunciation changes.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ugby 123Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

Wow, after reading the rest of it, it just shows you what happens if people are corected over spelling or grammar.

We don't have a rule to say we all have to spell right so please don't pull people up on it whatever your reasons as it causes mayhem and will put others off from posting.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)