FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Shocked yorkie only has five chunks ?
Shocked yorkie only has five chunks ?
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Did it used to have 6?"
Yorkie was originally composed of six chunks of chocolate, weighing 2oz or 58g. More recently, in an effort to reduce costs, the number of chunks has been reduced to five. The weight of the bar has varied over the years. In 2002, Yorkie bars were 70 grams. This had been reduced to 64.5 grams by 2010, and was reduced further to 61 grams in 2011 and then 55 grams later that year. Yorkie King size bars have also reduced in size. In 2011, standard Yorkie bars became available in 3 packs and the 'Not for Girls' slogan was dropped round about then. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
From our friend WiKi
Yorkie was originally composed of six chunks of chocolate,[3] weighing 2oz or 58g.[4] More recently, in an effort to reduce costs, the number of chunks has been reduced to five. The weight of the bar has varied over the years. In 2002, Yorkie bars were 70 grams. This had been reduced to 64.5 grams by 2010, and was reduced further to 61 grams in 2011 and then 55 grams later that year. Yorkie King size bars have also reduced in size.[5] In 2011, standard Yorkie bars became available in 3 packs and the 'Not for Girls' slogan was dropped round about then.
Flavours
End of WiKi
I've never bought a Yorkie since it took up the slogan Not for Girls. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Did it used to have 6?
Yorkie was originally composed of six chunks of chocolate, weighing 2oz or 58g. More recently, in an effort to reduce costs, the number of chunks has been reduced to five. The weight of the bar has varied over the years. In 2002, Yorkie bars were 70 grams. This had been reduced to 64.5 grams by 2010, and was reduced further to 61 grams in 2011 and then 55 grams later that year. Yorkie King size bars have also reduced in size. In 2011, standard Yorkie bars became available in 3 packs and the 'Not for Girls' slogan was dropped round about then."
Stinking chocolate thieves! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate "
Your ava makes me feel sick  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
Your ava makes me feel sick "
What makes me sick is having to pay over the odds for less product because some have no control over temptation and have to be spoonfed portions by the government because they are incapable of feeding themselves a nutritious diet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
Your ava makes me feel sick "
Pmsl |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate "
I'm a fattie. Do you not fuck fat women?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
Your ava makes me feel sick "
Thanks. You made me take a closer look! Put me right off me saveloy  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
I'm a fattie. Do you not fuck fat women? "
I have on occasion but not if they have a face full of chocolate. Have to laugh at people resorting to insulting my genitals simply for pointing out the government initiative that resulted in less chocolate. I'm sure other sensible eaters also feel aggrieved at having lesser portions enforced on them simply as some are just downright greedy |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
I'm a fattie. Do you not fuck fat women?
I have on occasion but not if they have a face full of chocolate. Have to laugh at people resorting to insulting my genitals simply for pointing out the government initiative that resulted in less chocolate. I'm sure other sensible eaters also feel aggrieved at having lesser portions enforced on them simply as some are just downright greedy "
Take offence at insults to your gentials if you will, but do you not think that your original post was not insulting in itself. Do you not think that your wording could have been better and that this has drawn some negative comments from other users because you went out of your way to be derogatory yourself?
Or were you just being inflammatory for the Lulz? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
I'm a fattie. Do you not fuck fat women?
I have on occasion but not if they have a face full of chocolate. Have to laugh at people resorting to insulting my genitals simply for pointing out the government initiative that resulted in less chocolate. I'm sure other sensible eaters also feel aggrieved at having lesser portions enforced on them simply as some are just downright greedy
Take offence at insults to your gentials if you will, but do you not think that your original post was not insulting in itself. Do you not think that your wording could have been better and that this has drawn some negative comments from other users because you went out of your way to be derogatory yourself?
Or were you just being inflammatory for the Lulz? "
I stand by it. If it is not greed then what is it? There is obviously truth in my statement for the health board to implement this. ok greedy fat fucks could have been shortened to greedy fat people. Nite I say greedy fat people, not people with weight issues due to a condition. While im at it I also include binge drinkers and the subsequent minimum pricing policy. why should I be penalised financially for others greed? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
I'm a fattie. Do you not fuck fat women?
I have on occasion but not if they have a face full of chocolate. Have to laugh at people resorting to insulting my genitals simply for pointing out the government initiative that resulted in less chocolate. I'm sure other sensible eaters also feel aggrieved at having lesser portions enforced on them simply as some are just downright greedy "
You've never had a Nutella blow job???? You really don't know what you're missing mate! I'm not offended by your wording, when I put on lots of weight my ex's favourite name for me was fat donut eating c***. Just think you're missing out |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
I'm a fattie. Do you not fuck fat women?
I have on occasion but not if they have a face full of chocolate. Have to laugh at people resorting to insulting my genitals simply for pointing out the government initiative that resulted in less chocolate. I'm sure other sensible eaters also feel aggrieved at having lesser portions enforced on them simply as some are just downright greedy
You've never had a Nutella blow job???? You really don't know what you're missing mate! I'm not offended by your wording, when I put on lots of weight my ex's favourite name for me was fat donut eating c***. Just think you're missing out "
What are the mechanics of this Nutella blowjob?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Has the greedy fat fuck short chocolate bar theory reached any other products ?
Perish the thought .....
Farting Fish n Chips
Measly Marshmallows
Barely there Burgers
Tiny Tortillas
Parts of Pizzas
I don't believe they had to make them smaller....... maybe they were asked to stop selling the fuck off giant ones.....
Your genitals are okay but cos they are upside down they do look a bit like an aardvaaarrrk. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate "
Badly worded..... but true. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its shocking but they all at it now. Less product less taste greater price
Sadly cannot blame rowntree. All the manufacturers agreed with the government to reduce the sizes of chocolate bars etc in a bid to tackle health problems and obesity. It's because greedy fat fucks did not know how to stop eating this had to be put in place. Although sure the confectioners are not complaining the fatties will just buy more to compensate
I'm a fattie. Do you not fuck fat women?
I have on occasion but not if they have a face full of chocolate. Have to laugh at people resorting to insulting my genitals simply for pointing out the government initiative that resulted in less chocolate. I'm sure other sensible eaters also feel aggrieved at having lesser portions enforced on them simply as some are just downright greedy
Take offence at insults to your gentials if you will, but do you not think that your original post was not insulting in itself. Do you not think that your wording could have been better and that this has drawn some negative comments from other users because you went out of your way to be derogatory yourself?
Or were you just being inflammatory for the Lulz?
I stand by it. If it is not greed then what is it? There is obviously truth in my statement for the health board to implement this. ok greedy fat fucks could have been shortened to greedy fat people. Nite I say greedy fat people, not people with weight issues due to a condition. While im at it I also include binge drinkers and the subsequent minimum pricing policy. why should I be penalised financially for others greed? "
I'm a greedy fucker but I still agree with your post. Why penalise everyone just to nanny people that won't be responsible for themselves.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"From our friend WiKi
Yorkie was originally composed of six chunks of chocolate,[3] weighing 2oz or 58g.[4] More recently, in an effort to reduce costs, the number of chunks has been reduced to five. The weight of the bar has varied over the years. In 2002, Yorkie bars were 70 grams. This had been reduced to 64.5 grams by 2010, and was reduced further to 61 grams in 2011 and then 55 grams later that year. Yorkie King size bars have also reduced in size.[5] In 2011, standard Yorkie bars became available in 3 packs and the 'Not for Girls' slogan was dropped round about then.
Flavours
End of WiKi
I've never bought a Yorkie since it took up the slogan Not for Girls."
Well my Yorkie is definately for girls, especially this one |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
