FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > The Child Support Agency

The Child Support Agency

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *ord and lady OP   Couple  over a year ago

around Glasgow

Why the need for the Child Support Agency when all the single guys on Fab can't accommodate you because they are looking after their children. Funny thing is, they will all abandon their children at the drop of a hat if you then invite them to come and join you for fun.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *oe_Steve_NWestCouple  over a year ago

Bolton

Sweeping generalisation? Z

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ishful.thinkingWoman  over a year ago

east london


"Why the need for the Child Support Agency when all the single guys on Fab can't accommodate you because they are looking after their children. Funny thing is, they will all abandon their children at the drop of a hat if you then invite them to come and join you for fun."

WOW - I am a single female with a kid and have been extremely lucky not to have had to go through the CSA - (mainly as I don’t need that level of agro in my life) but I truly see the need for it.

It’s like everything else in life a few rotten eggs give all a bad name.

I'll happily defend single dads, the vast majority will move heaven and earth to have and maintain contact with their children and don’t drop them at the drop of a hat.

Rather I find it works in reverse, we (I/women) are dropped at a moments notice if the opportunity arises for them to have additional time with the children and that’s as it should be.

Take my hat off to them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Well i think there a waste of time...

I split a year ago and yet to recieve 1p.

Now if i was on benefits they would be on to him but as i work it seems there not bothered!!

Makes me mad!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0