 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"that'll do us. Nice one lads  "
Your kidding right? That was shocking!
Why on earth they left walcott on for that amount of time is beyond me!
Walcott is a good player but he gasses out FAST.
He's not a 90 minute player.
He's the kind of player you bring on to force a match.
Imo bringing cleverly on was a ball bag naive tactic by hodders.
He wanted the win..you don't bring the likes of Tom fucking cleverly on when you need a goal.
You had Defoe sat on his todd the entire match when to be fair..if hodders had brought him on 60 minutes in..he probably would have bagged a goal and snatched a win.
Arse about face tactics to me.
  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *stmateMan
over a year ago
Notts |
I've noticed a pattern with the way England play, it seems if they don't get at least 2 goals in the first half, it's going to be one sided. Time to change tactics. Possession and chances from outside the 18 yard box. Better a draw than a loss but we want to see wins! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"that'll do us. Nice one lads
Your kidding right? That was shocking!
Why on earth they left walcott on for that amount of time is beyond me!
Walcott is a good player but he gasses out FAST.
He's not a 90 minute player.
He's the kind of player you bring on to force a match.
Imo bringing cleverly on was a ball bag naive tactic by hodders.
He wanted the win..you don't bring the likes of Tom fucking cleverly on when you need a goal.
You had Defoe sat on his todd the entire match when to be fair..if hodders had brought him on 60 minutes in..he probably would have bagged a goal and snatched a win.
Arse about face tactics to me.
"
Tonight was all about the result. We all know we're shite. Too many first choices were missing. As I said, that'll do nicely |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"that'll do us. Nice one lads
Your kidding right? That was shocking!
Why on earth they left walcott on for that amount of time is beyond me!
Walcott is a good player but he gasses out FAST.
He's not a 90 minute player.
He's the kind of player you bring on to force a match.
Imo bringing cleverly on was a ball bag naive tactic by hodders.
He wanted the win..you don't bring the likes of Tom fucking cleverly on when you need a goal.
You had Defoe sat on his todd the entire match when to be fair..if hodders had brought him on 60 minutes in..he probably would have bagged a goal and snatched a win.
Arse about face tactics to me.
Tonight was all about the result. We all know we're shite. Too many first choices were missing. As I said, that'll do nicely "
Maybe..just maybe.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Roy Keane seems to think we're a dead cert to qualify for the world cup, Poland could be a very tricky last game, i'm not sure i'd want to bet my money on it, lol. 
Its a home game for the Poles so im not so sure!  "
Too many bad memories from the 70's. I hope the Polish keeper isn't a "clown"
As for last night. Ukraine looked a very ordinary side and England got a draw. Sums it up really |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Come on boys 
with a win. 
No movement poor last ball no positioning ..... awful 
